PGDIS Position Statement on the Transfer of Mosaic Embryos 2021

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy

OBJECTIVE

Aneuploidy accounts for many pregnancy failures and congenital anomalies. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is a screening test applied to embryos created from in vitro fertilization to diminish the chance of an aneuploid conception. The rate of misdiagnosis for both false aneuploidy (false positive) and false euploidy (false negative) test results is unknown. The objective of this study was to determine the rate of misclassification of both aneuploidy and euploidy after PGT-A.

DATA SOURCES

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central, CINAHL and WHO Clinical Trials Registry from inception until April 10, 2024. The protocol was registered in International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO CRD 42020219074).

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

We included studies that conducted either a pre-clinical validation of the genetic platform for PGT-A using a cell line, studies that compared the embryo biopsy results to those from the whole dissected embryo or its inner cell mass (WE/ICM), and studies that compared the biopsy results to prenatal or postnatal genetic testing.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Two independent reviewers extracted true and false positives and negatives comparing biopsy results to the reference standard (known karyotype, WE/ICM, pregnancy outcome). For preclinical studies, the main outcome was the positive and negative predictive values. Misdiagnosis rate was the outcome for pregnancy outcome studies. The electronic search yielded 6674 citations, of which 109 were included. For WE/ICM studies (n=40), PPV was 89.2% (95% CI 83.1-94.0) and NPV was 94.2% (95% CI 91.1-96.7, I2=42%) for aneuploid and euploid embryos, respectively. The PPV for mosaic embryos of either a confirmatory mosaic or aneuploid result was 52.8% (95% CI 37.9-67.5). For pregnancy outcome studies (n=43), the misdiagnosis rate after euploid embryo transfer was 0.2% (95% CI 0.0-0.7%, I2=65%). However, the rate for mosaic transfer, with a confirmatory euploid pregnancy outcome, was 21.7% (95% CI: 9.6-36.9, I2=95%).

CONCLUSION

The accuracy of an aneuploid result from PGT-A is excellent and can be relied upon as a screening tool for embryos to avoid aneuploid pregnancies. Similarly, the misdiagnosis rate after euploid embryo transfer is less than 1%. However, there is a significant limitation in the accuracy of mosaic embryos.

Predicting frequency distributions of blastocyst biopsy genotypes by their discrete cohort size using the binomial theorem

RESEARCH QUESTION

How are blastocyst biopsy genotypes distributed as a function of cohort size, and how well does the binomial theorem predict the specific distribution of euploid genotypes across different cohort sizes?

DESIGN

This retrospective observational study included 1065 autologous blastocyst biopsies from 206 consecutive biopsy cases at a single centre. Cohorts were classified into three mutually exclusive categories: euploid+ (containing at least one euploid), euploid-mosaic/segmental+ and meiotic (containing whole chromosome errors alone), stratified by patient age (<37 years versus ≥37 years) and cohort size (10 discrete groups). 'Observed' distributions of individual euploid blastocysts/cohort were compared with binomially 'expected' distributions using the overall probability for euploidy for each age group.

RESULTS

For patients aged <37 years, cohorts were predominantly euploid+ (85.7%). The odds of being euploid increased for each 1-unit increase in cohort size. For each size group, the observed distribution of euploid blastocysts/cohort was closely concordant with distributions predicted binomially in the largest three cohort size quartiles. In contrast, cohort categories in the smallest quartile showed greater discordance. For patients aged ≥37 years, 48.5% of cohorts were euploid+ cohorts. While the odds of being euploid also increased for each 1-unit increase in cohort size, the observed peak number of euploid blastocysts/cohort was lower than predicted binomially in all size quartiles.

CONCLUSIONS

The binomial theorem can predict the probability distributions of euploid genotypes in cohort sizes exceeding four in patients aged <37 years without a biopsy. However, in smaller cohort sizes for patients aged >37 years and all cohort sizes in patients aged ≥37 years, there were fewer euploid blastocysts/cohort than predicted binomially; thus, untransferred mosaic/segmental genotypes represent a repository of pregnancy potential.

The evolution of preimplantation genetic testing: where is the limit?

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) has revolutionized reproductive medicine over the past 30 years, providing a reliable method for reducing the risk of transmitting severe inherited conditions and offering the possibility of improved IVF outcomes. Today, PGT is widely accepted and integrated into fertility care in many countries around the world. Its history, however, has not been without controversy, with debate around its application to the diagnosis of late-onset disorders, conditions with incomplete penetrance and its use for embryo selection based upon human leukocyte antigen status. Nonetheless, PGT has progressively broadened its scope, and the number of embryos undergoing genetic testing continues to grow each year. Preimplantation genetic testing is most often used for the detection of chromosomal abnormalities, assisting in the identification of embryos affected by lethal aneuploidy. This application has generated the greatest debate of all, owing, in part, to difficulties delivering effective embryo testing using earlier methods. In recent years, advances in technology and rigorous validation studies have helped to improve accuracy, although variability among methods underscores the need for greater standardization and transparency. Emerging technologies, such as whole genome sequencing (WGS) and genome editing, hold promise for further advancements but introduce complex ethical, privacy and consent challenges that demand careful consideration, public engagement and thorough clinical research before implementation. Given its current trajectory, it seems likely that the use of PGT will continue to grow, offering reduced reproductive risks and the possibility of enhanced fertility treatment outcomes for ever greater numbers of patients, ultimately becoming an accepted cornerstone of reproductive care.

Trophectoderm Biopsy: Present State of the Art

Trophectoderm (TE) biopsy is at present the most widely used procedure for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). At the blastocyst stage, more TE cells (five to seven) can be obtained for genetic analysis. While removing TE cells and not touching the inner cell mass (ICM), the procedure is less invasive. Due to a natural selection happening between day 3 and day 5, 6 or 7 of human embryo development, fewer embryos will have to be biopsied and tested. An additional benefit, especially in view of aneuploidy testing (PGT-A), is the lower level of mosaicism present at the blastocyst stage. The biopsy procedure involves two steps: laser-assisted zona pellucida (ZP) opening and the excision of five to eight TE cells from the blastocyst with or without additional laser energy. Different protocols have emerged over time with variations regarding the technique, the exact moment of ZP opening, and the method of cell removal. The 'pulling' method involves laser excision, whereas the 'flicking' method represents a mechanical approach with or without laser assistance. Embryo developmental speed reaching the full/expanded or hatching/hatched blastocyst stage dictates the timing of the procedure, mostly on day 5 post-insemination, and to a lesser extent on day 6 or even on day 7. The inclusion of lesser quality or delayed blastocysts may impact the quality of the TE sample as well as the clinical outcome. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is still the preferred method of fertilization for PGT-M (monogenic disorders) and PGT-SR (structural rearrangements). However, conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) seems feasible for PGT-A (aneuploidy testing). In the absence of a (conclusive) genetic result, the re-biopsy of cryopreserved blastocysts is possible, however, with reduced clinical outcomes. So far, neonatal outcome post-TE biopsy has so far been reassuringly documented.

Time-lapse analysis of embryos classified as euploid, mosaic, and aneuploid after embryonic trophectoderm biopsy

PURPOSE

Analyze morphokinetic, morphology, and KIDscore™Day5 in different PGT-A classes, focusing on putative mosaicism level and type.

METHODS

The single-center retrospective study analyzed 832 embryoscope-cultured blastocysts from cycles with at least one putative mosaic, conducted from 2020 to 2022. A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Putative mosaic embryos were significantly delayed compared to euploid in tPNF, t2, t4, t7, and t8 but significantly faster than aneuploid in tPNF, t2, t3, t4, t5, tSC, tM, tSB, and tB. Regarding the level, low-putative mosaic embryos (< 50%) showed significantly earlier tSC, tM, tSB, and tB compared to aneuploid, whereas high-putative mosaic embryos exhibited significantly earlier tSB and tB. Concerning the type of putative mosaicism, segmental aneuploidies reached significantly earlier t8, tM, and tB than complex aneuploidies. The study also investigated the usefulness of KIDscore™Day5 for embryo selection as an additional tool to PGT-A. A significant decrease in KIDscore™Day5 was observed from euploid to low-putative mosaic, from high-putative mosaic to aneuploid, and between segmental and complex-putative mosaic. The observed differences in KIDscore™Day5 were partially confirmed by transfer results: euploid blastocysts showed the most favorable clinical outcomes compared to low- and high-putative mosaics. Additionally, both euploid and segmental putative mosaic embryos exhibited the best clinical results compared to whole chromosome and complex putative mosaic. Moreover, within the same PGT-A class, embryos with the lowest KIDscore™Day5 values had significantly lower clinical results.

CONCLUSIONS

The data highlight that morphology, morphokinetics, and chromosome content in trophectoderm biopsy are closely related, and the KIDscore™Day5 algorithm reflects this interplay.

PGT-A: what's it for, what's wrong?

PGT-A, what's it for? Considering the increase in fetal aneuploidies with a woman's age and the high number of miscarriages associated with fetal karyotype anomalies, the concept of selecting IVF embryos based on their karyotype in order to transfer only euploid embryos and eliminate aneuploid ones was proposed. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) was then established, nearly 30 years ago, with the expectation that the transfer of euploid embryos would lead to a significant improvement in medically assisted reproduction (MAR) outcomes. PGT-A, what's wrong? Despite the practice and widespread use, PGT-A has not consistently proven its effectiveness. The clinical value of PGT-A remains controversial. The initial studies reported an increase in MAR outcomes. However, these studies used embryo transfer as the reference point. More recent studies, which use intention-to-treat as the reference point, show, at best, slight improvements and, at worst, a reduction in the considered IVF outcomes. In this article, we attempt to answer two key questions: "What is it for?" and "What's wrong with PGT-A?". We also explore some of the ethical issues raised by these conclusions. Ultimately, we suggest that PGT-A should no longer be offered to infertile couples.

Prenatal Ultrasound Findings and Chromosomal Outcomes of Pregnancies with Mosaic Embryo Transfer

BACKGROUND

To investigate prenatal ultrasound findings and the chromosomal outcomes of mosaic embryo transfer.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted on pregnant women who underwent mosaic embryo transfer following blastocyst-stage preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) at CHA Gangnam Medical Center from January 2021 to July 2024. Trophectoderm biopsy specimens were collected using standard protocols, and next-generation sequencing profiles were defined as mosaics when displaying copy number counts in the 20-80% range. The results of the PGT-A, the amniocentesis results, the findings of prenatal ultrasounds, and the pregnancy outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 88 mosaic embryos were transferred, of which 77 embryos were successfully implanted. Sixty-seven embryo-maintained pregnancies went beyond 11 weeks (87.0%), all among 58 patients with singleton pregnancies. The chaotic subtype showed the lowest ongoing pregnancy rate, and high-level mosaicism was less frequent in the ongoing group, compared to the total study group and the successful implantation group. Amniocentesis was performed on 33 mothers (56.9%), revealing two cases with abnormal findings that did not correlate with the PGT-A results. Two cases showed abnormalities in the second trimester detailed ultrasound, and both subsequently demonstrated normal findings in the third trimester and after birth. The average gestational age at birth was 38.4 weeks, and the average birth weight was 3313 g. No congenital anomalies were detected in 16 postnatal cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicated that mosaic embryos can develop into euploid healthy infants with various levels or types of mosaicism, although the postnatal follow-up data are limited. This study is invaluable for counseling clinical results after mosaic embryo transfer, reassuring that, if patients do not have euploid embryos available, mosaic embryos can also be a viable option for transfer.

Approximate Bayesian computation supports a high incidence of chromosomal mosaicism in blastocyst-stage human embryos

Chromosome mis-segregation is common in human meiosis and mitosis, and the resulting aneuploidies are the leading cause of pregnancy loss. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) seeks to prioritize chromosomally normal embryos for transfer based on genetic analysis of a biopsy of approximately five trophectoderm cells from blastocyst-stage in vitro fertilized (IVF) embryos. While modern PGT-A platforms classify these biopsies as aneuploid, euploid, or mosaic (possessing a mixture of normal and aneuploid cells), the underlying incidences of aneuploid, euploid, and mosaic embryos and the rates of meiotic and mitotic error that produced them remain largely unknown. To address this knowledge gap, we paired a recent method for embryo simulation with approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) to infer rates of meiotic and mitotic error that best explain published PGT-A data. By simulating from these posterior distributions, we also evaluated the chromosomal status of entire embryos. For a published clinical sample, we estimated a 39-43% probability of meiotic error per meiosis, as well as a 1.0-3.0% probability of mitotic error per mitosis, depending on assumptions about spatial clustering of aneuploid cells within mosaic embryos. In addition, our analyses suggest that less than 1% of blastocysts are fully euploid, and that many embryos possess low-level mosaic clones that are not captured during biopsy. These broad conclusions were relatively insensitive to potential misclassification of mosaic biopsies. Together, our work helps overcome the limitations of embryo biopsies to estimate the fundamental rates of cell division errors that are the main causes of human pregnancy loss.

Genetics in Reproductive Medicine

Thanks to advances in technology, genetic testing is now available to explore the causes of infertility and to assess the risk of a given couple passing on a genetic disorder to their offspring. This allows at-risk couples to make an informed decision when opting for assisted reproduction and allows professionals to offer pre-implantation diagnosis when appropriate. Genetic screening of an infertile couple has thus become standard practice for an appropriate diagnosis, treatment, and prognostic assessment. This review aims to highlight the conditions under which genetic screening plays a role in improving reproductive outcomes for infertile couples.

Non-invasive prediction of human embryonic ploidy using artificial intelligence: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Embryonic ploidy is critical for the success of embryo transfer. Currently, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is the gold standard for detecting ploidy abnormalities. However, PGT-A has several inherent limitations, including invasive biopsy, high economic burden, and ethical constraints. This paper provides the first comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms using embryonic images for non-invasive prediction of embryonic ploidy.

Methods

Comprehensive searches of studies that developed or utilized AI algorithms to predict embryonic ploidy from embryonic imaging, published up until August 10, 2024, across PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, IEEE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were performed. Studies with prospective or retrospective designs were included without language restrictions. The summary receiver operating characteristic curve, along with pooled sensitivity and specificity, was estimated using a bivariate random-effects model. The risk of bias and study quality were evaluated using the QUADAS-AI tool. Heterogeneity was quantified using the inconsistency index (I 2 ), derived from Cochran's Q test. Predefined subgroup analyses and bivariate meta-regression were conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024500409).

Findings

Twenty eligible studies were identified, with twelve studies included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve of AI for predicting embryonic euploidy were 0.71 (95% CI: 0.59-0.81), 0.75 (95% CI: 0.69-0.80), and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.76-0.83), respectively, based on a total of 6879 embryos (3110 euploid and 3769 aneuploid). Meta-regression and subgroup analyses identified the type of AI-driven decision support system, external validation, risk of bias, and year of publication as the primary contributors to the observed heterogeneity. There was no evidence of publication bias.

Interpretation

Our findings indicate that AI algorithms exhibit promising performance in predicting embryonic euploidy based on embryonic imaging. Although the current AI models developed cannot entirely replace invasive methods for determining embryo ploidy, AI demonstrates promise as an auxiliary decision-making tool for embryo selection, particularly for individuals who are unable to undergo PGT-A. To enhance the quality of future research, it is essential to overcome the specific challenges and limitations associated with AI studies in reproductive medicine.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2022YFC2702905), the Shengjing Freelance Researcher Plan of Shengjing Hospital and the 345 talent project of Shengjing Hospital.

Non-invasively predicting euploidy in human blastocysts via quantitative 3D morphology measurement: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Blastocyst morphology has been demonstrated to be associated with ploidy status. Existing artificial intelligence models use manual grading or 2D images as the input for euploidy prediction, which suffer from subjectivity from observers and information loss due to incomplete features from 2D images. Here we aim to predict euploidy in human blastocysts using quantitative morphological parameters obtained by 3D morphology measurement.

METHODS

Multi-view images of 226 blastocysts on Day 6 were captured by manually rotating blastocysts during the preparation stage of trophectoderm biopsy. Quantitative morphological parameters were obtained by 3D morphology measurement. Six machine learning models were trained using 3D morphological parameters as the input and PGT-A results as the ground truth outcome. Model performance, including sensitivity, specificity, precision, accuracy and AUC, was evaluated on an additional test dataset. Model interpretation was conducted on the best-performing model.

RESULTS

All the 3D morphological parameters were significantly different between euploid and non-euploid blastocysts. Multivariate analysis revealed that three of the five parameters including trophectoderm cell number, trophectoderm cell size variance and inner cell mass area maintained statistical significance (P < 0.001, aOR = 1.054, 95% CI 1.034-1.073; P = 0.003, aOR = 0.994, 95% CI 0.991-0.998; P = 0.010, aOR = 1.003, 95% CI 1.001-1.006). The accuracy of euploidy prediction by the six machine learning models ranged from 80 to 95.6%, and the AUCs ranged from 0.881 to 0.984. Particularly, the decision tree model achieved the highest accuracy of 95.6% (95% CI 84.9-99.5%) with the AUC of 0.978 (95% CI 0.882-0.999), and the extreme gradient boosting model achieved the highest AUC of 0.984 (95% CI 0.892-1.000) with the accuracy of 93.3% (95% CI 81.7-98.6%). No significant difference was found between different age groups using either decision tree or extreme gradient boosting to predict euploid blastocysts. The quantitative criteria extracted from the decision tree imply that euploid blastocysts have a higher number of trophectoderm cells, larger inner cell mass area, and smaller trophectoderm cell size variance compared to non-euploid blastocysts.

CONCLUSIONS

Using quantitative morphological parameters obtained by 3D morphology measurement, the decision tree-based machine learning model achieved an accuracy of 95.6% and AUC of 0.978 for predicting euploidy in Day 6 human blastocysts.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

N/A.

Aligning genotyping and copy number data in single trophectoderm biopsies for aneuploidy prediction: uncovering incomplete concordance

STUDY QUESTION

To what extent can genotype analysis aid in the classification of (mosaic) aneuploid embryos diagnosed through copy number analysis of a trophectoderm (TE) biopsy?

SUMMARY ANSWER

In a small portion of embryos, genotype analysis revealed signatures of meiotic or uniform aneuploidy in those diagnosed with intermediate copy number changes, and signatures of presumed mitotic or putative mosaic aneuploidy in those diagnosed with full copy number changes.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) for preimplantation genetic testing has provided valuable insights into the prevalence of (mosaic) chromosomal aneuploidy at the blastocyst stage. However, diagnosis of (mosaic) aneuploidy often relies solely on (intermediate) copy number analysis of a single TE biopsy. Integrating genotype information allows for independent assessment of the origin and degree of aneuploidy. Yet, studies aligning both datasets to predict (putative mosaic) aneuploidy in embryos remain scarce.

STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION

A single TE biopsy was collected from 1560 embryos derived from 221 couples tested for a monogenic disorder (n = 218) or microdeletion-/microduplication syndrome (n = 3). TE samples were subjected to both copy number and genotyping analysis.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS

Copy number and SNP genotyping analysis were conducted using GENType. Unbalanced chromosomal anomalies ≥10 Mb (or ≥20 Mb for copy number calls <50%) were classified by degree, based on low-range intermediate (LR, 30-50%), high-range intermediate (HR, 50-70%) or full (>70%) copy number changes. These categories were further subjected to genotyping analysis to ascertain the origin (and/or degree) of aneuploidy. For chromosomal gains, the meiotic division of origin (meiotic I/II versus non-meiotic or presumed mitotic) was established by studying the haplotypes. The level of monosomy (uniform versus putative mosaic) in the biopsy could be ascertained from the B-allele frequencies. For segmental aneuploidies, genotyping was restricted to deletions.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Of 1479 analysed embryos, 24% (n = 356) exhibited a whole-chromosome aneuploidy, with 19% (n = 280) showing full copy number changes suggestive of uniform aneuploidy. Among 258 embryos further investigated by genotyping, 95% of trisomies with full copy number changes were identified to be of meiotic origin. For monosomies, a complete loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in the biopsy was observed in 97% of cases, yielding a 96% concordance rate at the embryo level (n = 248/258). Interestingly, 4% of embryos (n = 10/258) showed SNP signatures of non-meiotic gain or putative mosaic loss instead. Meanwhile, 5% of embryos (n = 76/1479) solely displayed HR (2.5%; n = 37) or LR (2.6%; n = 39) intermediate copy number changes, with an additional 2% showing both intermediate and full copy number changes. Among embryos with HR intermediate copy number changes where genotyping was feasible (n = 25/37), 92% (n = 23/25) showed SNP signatures consistent with putative mosaic aneuploidy. However, 8% (n = 2/25) exhibited evidence of meiotic trisomy (9%) or complete LOH in the biopsy (7%). In the LR intermediate group, 1 of 33 (3%) genotyped embryos displayed complete LOH. Furthermore, segmental aneuploidy was detected in 7% of embryos (n = 108/1479) (or 9% (n = 139) with added whole-chromosome aneuploidy). These errors were often (52%) characterized by intermediate copy number values, which closely aligned with genotyping data when examined (94-100%).

LARGE SCALE DATA

N/A.

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

The findings were based on single TE biopsies and the true extent of mosaicism was not validated through embryo dissection. Moreover, evidence of absence of a meiotic origin for a trisomy should not be construed as definitive proof of a mitotic error. Additionally, a genotyping diagnosis was not always attainable due to the absence of a recombination event necessary to discern between meiotic II and non-meiotic trisomy, or the unavailability of DNA from both parents.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Interpreting (intermediate) copy number changes of a single TE biopsy alone as evidence for (mosaic) aneuploidy in the embryo remains suboptimal. Integrating genotype information alongside the copy number status could provide a more comprehensive assessment of the embryo's genetic makeup, within and beyond the single TE biopsy. By identifying meiotic aberrations, especially in presumed mosaic embryos, we underscore the potential value of genotyping analysis as a deselection tool, ultimately striving to reduce adverse clinical outcomes.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

L.D.W. was supported by the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO; 1S74621N). M.B., K.T., F.V.M., S.J., A.V.T., V.S., D.S., A.D., and S.S. are supported by Ghent University Hospital. B.M. was funded by Ghent University. The authors have no conflicts of interest.

The current clinical applications of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT): acknowledging the limitations of biology and technology

INTRODUCTION

Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) is a cutting-edge test used to detect genetic abnormalities in embryos fertilized through Medically Assisted Reproduction (MAR). PGT aims to ensure that embryos selected for transfer are free of specific genetic conditions or chromosome abnormalities, thereby reducing chances for unsuccessful MAR cycles, complicated pregnancies, and genetic diseases in future children.

AREAS COVERED

In PGT, genetics, embryology, and technology progress and evolve together. Biological and technological limitations are described and addressed to highlight complexity and knowledge constraints and draw attention to concerns regarding safety of procedures, clinical validity, and utility, extent of applications and overall ethical implications for future families and society.

EXPERT OPINION

Understanding the genetic basis of diseases along with advanced technologies applied in embryology and genetics contribute to faster, cost-effective, and more efficient PGT. Next Generation Sequencing-based techniques, enhanced by improved bioinformatics, are expected to upgrade diagnostic accuracy. Complicating findings such as mosaicism, mt-DNA variants, variants of unknown significance, or variants related to late-onset or polygenic diseases will however need further appraisal. Emphasis on monitoring such emerging data is crucial for evidence-based counseling while standardized protocols and guidelines are essential to ensure clinical value and respect of Ethical, Legal and Societal Issues.

Preimplantation genetic testing for complex chromosomal rearrangements: clinical outcomes and potential risk factors

Objective

Complex chromosome rearrangements (CCR) are rare structural abnormalities involving at least three breakpoints, categorized into three types based on their structure: type A (three-way rearrangements), type B (double two-way translocations), and type C (exceptional CCR). However, thus far, limited data exists on preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) in CCR carriers. This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes and influencing factors of PGT-SR in couples with CCR.

Methods

Fifteen couples with unique CCR recruited from 793 couples following PGT-SR between January 2017 and May 2023. In addition, a total of 54 CCR cases, 39 previously reported as well as 15 newly added, were included in the analysis of factors associate with normal/balanced embryos.

Results

A total of 100 blastocysts were biopsied and analyzed in 15 CCR couples after 17 PGT-SR cycles, with 16.0% being euploid, 78.0% aneuploid and 6.0% mosaic. 11 normal/balanced embryos and one mosaic embryo were transferred, resulting in eight live births. Furthermore, based on the combined data from 54 CCR carriers, the proportion of normal/balanced embryos was 10.8%, with a significant decrease observed among female carriers compared to male heterozygotes (6.5% vs. 15.5%, p = 0.002). Type B exhibited the lowest rate of euploid embryos at only 6.7%, followed by type A at 11.6% and type C at 14.0%, although the differences were not significant (p = 0.182). After completing the multivariate generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis, type B (p = 0.014) and female carrier (p = 0.002) were identified as independent risk factors for fewer euploid embryos.

Conclusion

The occurrence of balanced CCR in patients with reproductive abnormalities may be more frequent than we expected. Despite the proportion of normal/balanced embryos being significantly low, which can be influenced by CCR type and carrier's sex, PGT-SR may improve the reproductive outcomes among CCR cases. These findings can optimize the clinical management and genetic counseling of CCR carriers seeking assisted reproductive technology (ART).

Role of genetic analysis of products of conception and PGT in managing early pregnancy loss

This article considers the addition of comprehensive 24-chromosomal microarray (CMA) analysis of products of conception (POC) to a standard evaluation for recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) to help direct treatment towards expectant management versus IVF with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A). The review included retrospective data from 65,333 miscarriages, a prospective evaluation of 378 couples with RPL who had CMA testing of POC and the standard workup, and data from an additional 1020 couples who were evaluated for RPL but did not undergo CMA testing of POC. Aneuploidy in POC explained the pregnancy loss in 57.7% (218/378) of cases. In contrast, the full RPL evaluation recommended by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine identified a potential cause in only 42.9% (600/1398). Combining the data from the RPL evaluation and the results of genetic testing of POC provides a probable explanation for the loss in over 90% (347/378) of women. Couples with an unexplained loss after the standard evaluation with POC aneuploidy accounted for 41% of cases; PGT-A may be considered after expectant management. Conversely, PGT-A would have a limited role in those with a euploid loss and a possible explanation after the standard workup. Categorizing a pregnancy loss as an explained versus unexplained loss after the standard evaluation combined with the results of CMA testing of POC may help identify patients who would benefit from expectant management versus PGT-A.

Polygenic embryo screening: quo vadis?

Recently, the use of polygenic risk scores in embryo screening (PGT-P) has been introduced on the premise of reducing polygenic disease risk through embryo selection. However, it has been met with extensive critique: considered "technology-driven" rather than "evidence-based", concerns exist about its validity, utility, ethics, and societal effects. Its scientific foundations and criticisms thus need to be carefully considered. However, seeing as PGT-P is already offered in some settings, further questions need to be addressed, in order to give due diligence to various aspects of PGT-P. By examining the complexities of clinical introduction of PGT-P, we discuss whether PGT-P could be responsibly implemented in the first place, what elements need to be addressed if PGT-P is clinically implemented, and subsequently how counselling and decision-making of its users could be envisaged. By dissecting these elements, we provide an overview of important practical questions of PGT-P and emphasize elements of PGT-P that we think have yet to be given sufficient attention. These questions and elements are for example related to the potential target group, scope, and decision-making possibilities of PGT-P. The aspects we raise are crucial to consider by the scientific community and policy makers for the development of guidelines and/or an ethical framework for PGT-P.

Preimplantation genetic testing: A narrative review

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is a diagnostic procedure that has become a powerful complement to assisted reproduction techniques. PGT has numerous indications, and there is a wide range of techniques that can be used, each with advantages and limitations that should be considered before choosing the more adequate one. In this article, it is reviewed the indications for PGT, biopsy and diagnostic technologies, along with their evolution, while also broaching new emerging methods.

Re-Examination of PGT-A Detected Genetic Pathology in Compartments of Human Blastocysts: A Series of 23 Cases

Background: In recent years, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) has become widespread in assisted reproduction. However, contrary to expectations, PGT-A does not significantly improve the clinical outcomes of assisted reproductive technologies. One of the underlying reasons is the discordance between the PGT-A results and the true chromosomal constitution of the blastocyst. In this case series, we re-examined the PGT-A results in trophectoderm (TE) re-biopsies and in the two isolated blastocyst compartments-the TE and the inner cell mass (ICM). Methods: This study enrolled 23 human blastocysts from 17 couples who were referred for assisted reproduction. The blastocysts were unsuitable for uterine transfer due to the chromosomal imbalance revealed by PGT-A using array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) (n = 11) or next-generation sequencing (NGS) (n = 12). The re-examination of the PGT results involved two steps: (1) a TE re-biopsy with subsequent aCGH and (2) blastocyst separation into the TE and the ICM with a subsequent cell-by-cell analysis of each isolated compartment by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with the DNA probes to chromosomes 13, 16, 18, 21, and 22 as well as to the PGT-A detected imbalanced chromosomes. Results: In 8 out of 23 cases, the PGT-A results were concordant with both the re-biopsy and the isolated TE and ICM analyses. The latter included the diagnoses of full non-mosaic aneuploidies (five cases of trisomies and two cases of monosomies). In one case, the results of PGT-A, aCGH on the TE re-biopsy, and FISH on the isolated TE showed Xp tetrasomy, which contrasted with the FISH results on the isolated ICM, where this chromosomal pathology was not detected. This case was classified as a confined mosaicism. In 4 out of 23 cases, the results were partially discordant. The latter included one case of trisomy 12, which was detected as non-mosaic by PGT-A and the re-biopsy and as mosaic by FISH on the isolated TE and ICM. This case was classified as a true mosaicism with a false negative PGT-A result. In 11 out of 23 cases, the re-examination results were not concordant with the PGT-A results. In one of these discordant cases, non-mosaic tetraploidy was detected by FISH in the isolated TE and ICM, whereas the PGT-A and the TE re-biopsy failed to detect any abnormality, which advocated for their false negative result. In two cases, the re-examination did not confirm full aneuploidies. In eight cases, full or partial mosaic aneuploidies as well as chaotic mosacism were not confirmed in the isolated TE nor the isolated ICM. Thus, in 47.8% of cases, the PGT-A results did not reflect the true chromosomal constitution of a blastocyst. Conclusions: The PGT results may have different prognostic value in the characterization of the chromosomal constitution of a blastocyst. The detected non-mosaic aneuploidies have the highest prognostic value. In stark contrast, most PGT-identified mosaic aneuploidies fail to characterize the true chromosomal constitution of a blastocyst. Once detected, a differential diagnosis is needed.

Mechanism of chromosomal mosaicism in preimplantation embryos and its effect on embryo development

Aneuploidy is one of the main causes of miscarriage and in vitro fertilization failure. Mitotic abnormalities in preimplantation embryos are the main cause of mosaicism, which may be influenced by several endogenous factors such as relaxation of cell cycle control mechanisms, defects in chromosome cohesion, centrosome aberrations and abnormal spindle assembly, and DNA replication stress. In addition, incomplete trisomy rescue is a rare cause of mosaicism. However, there may be a self-correcting mechanism in mosaic embryos, which allows some mosaicisms to potentially develop into normal embryos. At present, it is difficult to accurately diagnose mosaicism using preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. Therefore, in clinical practice, embryos diagnosed as mosaic should be considered comprehensively based on the specific situation of the patient.

Trophectoderm cells of human mosaic embryos display increased apoptotic levels and impaired differentiation capacity: a molecular clue regarding their reproductive fate?

STUDY QUESTION

Are there cell lineage-related differences in the apoptotic rates and differentiation capacity of human blastocysts diagnosed as euploid, mosaic, and aneuploid after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) based on concurrent copy number and genotyping analysis?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Trophectoderm (TE) cells of mosaic and aneuploid blastocysts exhibit significantly higher levels of apoptosis and significantly reduced differentiation capacity compared to those of euploid blastocysts.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Embryos diagnosed as mosaic after PGT-A can develop into healthy infants, yet understanding the reasons behind their reproductive potential requires further research. One hypothesis suggests that mosaicism can be normalized through selective apoptosis and reduced proliferation of aneuploid cells, but direct evidence of these mechanisms in human embryos is lacking. Additionally, data interpretation from studies involving mosaic embryos has been hampered by retrospective analysis methods and the high incidence of false-positive mosaic diagnoses stemming from the use of poorly specific PGT-A platforms.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Prospective cohort study performing colocalization of cell-lineage and apoptotic markers by immunofluorescence (IF). We included a total of 64 human blastocysts donated to research on Day 5 or 6 post-fertilization (dpf) by 43 couples who underwent in vitro fertilization treatment with PGT-A at IVI-RMA Valencia between September 2019 and October 2022. A total of 27 mosaic blastocysts were analyzed.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

The study consisted of two phases: Phase I (caspase-3, n = 53 blastocysts): n = 13 euploid, n = 22 mosaic, n = 18 aneuploid. Phase II (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL), n = 11 blastocysts): n = 2 euploid, n = 5 mosaic, n = 4 aneuploid. Following donation for research, vitrified blastocysts were warmed, cultured until re-expansion, fixed, processed for IF, and imaged using confocal microscopy. For each blastocyst, the following cell counts were conducted: total cells (DAPI+), TE cells (GATA3+), inner cell mass (ICM) cells (GATA3-/NANOG+), and apoptotic cells (caspase-3+ or TUNEL+). The incidence of apoptosis was calculated for each blastocyst by dividing the number of caspase-3+ cells (Phase I) or TUNEL+ cells (Phase II) by the number of TE or ICM cells. Statistical analysis was performed according to data type and distribution (P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant).

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Phase I: Mosaic blastocysts displayed a similar number of total cells (49.6 ± 15 cells at 5 dpf; 58.8 ± 16.9 cells at 6 dpf), TE cells (38.8 ± 13.7 cells at 5 dpf; 49.2 ± 16.2 cells at 6 dpf), and ICM cells (10.9 ± 4.2 cells at 5 dpf; 9.7 ± 7.1 cells at 6 dpf) compared to euploid and aneuploid blastocysts (P > 0.05). The proportion of TE cells retaining NANOG expression increased gradually from euploid blastocysts (9.7% = 63/651 cells at 5 dpf; 0% = 0/157 cells at 6 dpf) to mosaic blastocysts (13.1% = 104/794 cells at 5 dpf; 3.4% = 12/353 cells at 6 dpf) and aneuploid blastocysts (27.9% = 149/534 cells at 5 dpf; 4.6% = 19/417 cells at 6 dpf) (P < 0.05). At the TE level, caspase-3+ cells were frequently observed (39% = 901/2310 cells). The proportion of caspase-3+ TE cells was significantly higher in mosaic blastocysts (44.1% ± 19.6 at 5 dpf; 43% ± 16.8 at 6 dpf) and aneuploid blastocysts (45.9% ± 16.1 at 5 dpf; 49% ± 15.1 at 6 dpf) compared to euploid blastocysts (26.6% ± 16.6 at 5 dpf; 17.5% ± 14.8 at 6 dpf) (P < 0.05). In contrast, at the ICM level, caspase-3+ cells were rarely observed (1.9% = 11/596 cells), and only detected in mosaic blastocysts (2.6% = 6/232 cells) and aneuploid blastocysts (2.5% = 5/197 cells) (P > 0.05). Phase II: Consistently, TUNEL+ cells were only observed in TE cells (32.4% = 124/383 cells). An increasing trend was identified toward a higher proportion of TUNEL+ cells in the TE of mosaic blastocysts (37.2% ± 21.9) and aneuploid blastocysts (39% ± 41.7), compared to euploid blastocysts (23% ± 32.5), although these differences did not reach statistical significance (P > 0.05).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The observed effects on apoptosis and differentiation may not be exclusive to aneuploid cells. Additionally, variations in aneuploidies and unexplored factors related to blastocyst development and karyotype concordance may introduce potential biases and uncertainties in the results.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Our findings demonstrate a cell lineage-specific effect of aneuploidy on the apoptotic levels and differentiation capacity of human blastocysts. This contributes to unravelling the biological characteristics of mosaic blastocysts and supports the concept of clonal depletion of aneuploid cells in explaining their reproductive potential.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This work was funded by grants from Centro para el Desarrollo Tecnológico Industrial (CDTI) (20190022) and Generalitat Valenciana (APOTIP/2019/009). None of the authors has any conflict of interest to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Mosaic embryo transfer versus additional IVF with PGT-A Cycle: a decision model comparing live birth rate and cost

PURPOSE

To evaluate the relative live birth rate and net cost difference between mosaic embryo transfer and an additional cycle of IVF with PGT-A for patients whose only remaining embryos are non-euploid.

METHODS

A decision analytic model was designed with model parameters varying based on discrete age cutoffs (<35, 35-37, 38-39, 40-42, 43-44, >44). Model inputs included probabilities of successful IVF, clinical pregnancy, and live birth as well as costs of IVF with PGT-A, embryo transfer, live birth, amniocentesis, and dilation and curettage. All costs were modeled from the healthcare system perspective and adjusted for inflation to 2023 $USD. Model outcomes were sub-stratified by degree and type of mosaicism.

RESULTS

For patients younger than 43, an additional cycle of IVF with PGT-A resulted in a higher relative live birth rate (<35, +20%; 35-37, +15%; 38-39, +17%; 40-42, +6%; average, +14.5%) compared to mosaic embryo transfer with an average additional cost of $16,633. For patients older than 42, mosaic embryo transfer resulted in a higher live birth rate (43-44, +5%; >44, +3%; average, +4%) while on average costing $9572 less than an additional cycle of IVF with PGT-A.

CONCLUSION

Mosaic embryo transfers are a superior alternative to an additional cycle of IVF with PGT-A for patients older than 42 whose only remaining embryos are non-euploid. Mosaic embryo transfers also should be considered for patients younger than 42 who are unable to pursue additional autologous IVF cycles. Counseling and care should be personalized to individual patients and embryos.

To transfer or not to transfer: the dilemma of mosaic embryos - a narrative review

A frequent finding after preimplantation genetic diagnostic testing for aneuploidies using next-generation sequencing is an embryo that is putatively mosaic. The prevalence of this outcome remains unclear and varies with technical and external factors. Mosaic embryos can be classified by the percentage of cells affected, type of chromosome involvement (whole or segmental), number of affected chromosomes or affected cell type (inner mass cell, trophectoderm or both). The origin of mosaicism seems to be intrinsic as a post-zygotic mitotic error, but some external factors can play a role. As experience has increased with the transfer of mosaic embryos, clinical practice has gradually become more flexible in recent years. Nevertheless, clinical results show lower implantation, pregnancy and clinical pregnancy rates and higher miscarriage rates with mosaic embryo transfer when compared with the transfer of euploid embryos. Prenatal diagnosis is highly recommended after the transfer of mosaic embryos. This narrative review is intended to serve as reference material for practitioners in reproductive medicine who must manage a mosaic embryo result after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies.

Birth after low-level +20 Aneuploid Mosaic Embryo Transfer: A Case Report

OBJECTIVE

Recently, it has been discussed whether or not mosaic embryo transfers should be performed since they might result in viable pregnancies, although they often end up being discarded. We report a case of successful pregnancy, after a mosaic embryo transfer from an in vitro matured egg and frozen PESA sperm.

CASE DESCRIPTION

Tests performed on a female aged 40 years and a male aged 37 years seeking fertility treatment found she had an adequate ovarian reserve and patent fallopian tubes. He had a history of cryptorchidism and inguinal hernia repair. The spermogram showed azoospermia, and testicular ultrasound showed an atrophic left testicle and a normal right testis. The vas deferens was palpated during physical examination. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection with percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA) was indicated. Two cycles of IVF after controlled ovarian stimulation with follitropin delta was performed. In the first cycle, seven mature eggs were inseminated, two fertilized normally, resulting in one blastocyst biopsied and analyzed by NGS with complex aneuploid results. In the second cycle, frozen sperm from PESA was used. Three eggs were inseminated on the day of the procedure (resulting in 2 blastocysts), and three in vitro matured eggs were inseminated after 24 hours (resulting in 1 blastocyst). NGS analysis showed two complex aneuploid embryos and one 40% low-level trisomy 20 aneuploid mosaicism (+20) for the post 24-hour embryo. A mosaic embryo transfer was performed, resulting in clinical pregnancy and birth of a healthy baby girl with a normal blood karyotype.

DISCUSSION

Mosaic embryo transfer is a topic for discussion. Certain levels of mosaicism do not seem to pose risks to the development of the fetus.

The mosaic embryo: what it means for the doctor and the patient

INTRODUCTION

Mosaic embryos are embryos that on preimplantation genetic analysis are found to be composed of euploid and aneuploid cells. Although most of these embryos do not implant when transferred into the uterus following IVF treatment, some may implant and are capable of giving rise to babies.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

There is currently an increasing number of reports of live births following the transfer of mosaic embryos. Compared to euploid, mosaic embryos have lower implantation rates and higher rates of miscarriage, and occasionally aneuploid component persists. However, their outcome is better than that obtained after the transfer of embryos consisting entirely of aneuploid cells. After implantation, the ability to develop into a full-term pregnancy is influenced by the amount and type of chromosomal mosaicism present in a mosaic embryo. Nowadays many experts in the reproductive field consider mosaic transfers as an option when no euploid embryos are available. Genetic counseling is an important part of educating patients about the likelihood of having a pregnancy with healthy baby but also on the risk that mosaicism could persist and result in liveborn with chromosomal abnormality. Each situation needs to be assessed on a case-by-case basis and counseled accordingly.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

So far, the transfers of 2155 mosaic embryos have been documented and 440 live births resulting in healthy babies have been reported. In addition, in the literature to date, there are 6 cases in which embryonic mosaicism persisted.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the available data indicate that mosaic embryos have the potential to implant and develop into healthy babies, albeit with lower success rates than euploids. Further clinical outcomes should be collected to better establish a refined ranking of embryos to transfer.

The morphokinetic signature of human blastocysts with mosaicism and the clinical outcomes following transfer of embryos with low-level mosaicism

BACKGROUND

Genetic mosaicism is commonly observed in human blastocysts. Embryos' morphokinetic feature observed from time-lapse monitoring (TLM) is helpful to predict the embryos' ploidy status in a non-invasive way. However, morphokinetic research on mosaic embryos is extremely limited. Moreover, transfer of mosaic embryos is a new attempt in reproductive medicine, while studies regarding the clinical and neonatal outcomes following transfer of embryos with different levels and types of mosaicism are needed. This study aimed to investigate the morphokinetic characteristics of mosaic blastocysts, uncover clinical outcomes of mosaic embryos, and evaluate the effect of level and type of mosaicism on transfer outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 923 blastocysts from 229 preimplantation genetic testing cycles were cultured in TLM incubators in a single fertilization center between July 2016 and July 2021. Multivariate logistic regression models showed mosaic embryos had significantly shorter time to reach morula when compared with euploid (P = 0.002), mosaic with aneuploid (P = 0.005), and aneuploid (P = 0.005) embryos after adjusting the potential confounders. KIDScore is an artificial intelligence scoring program from time lapse incubation system to predict embryo implantation potential. Mosaic with aneuploid embryos had significantly lower KIDScore than euploid (P = 6.47e-4), mosaic (P = 0.005), and aneuploid (P = 0.004) embryos after adjustment. Meanwhile, we compared the clinical outcomes following transfer of low-level (< 50%) mosaic embryos (N = 60) with euploid embryos (N = 1301) matched using propensity scoring collected from September 2020 to January 2023. Mosaic embryos had significantly lower clinical pregnancy rate (41.67% vs. 57.65%, P = 0.015) and live birth rate (38.33% vs. 51.35%, P = 0.048) than the euploid embryos. Subgroup analyses showed the whole, segmental, and complex chromosome mosaic embryos had the similar clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The shortened time to reach morula in mosaic embryos and the low KIDScore in mosaic with aneuploid embryos revealed innovative clues to embryo selection with the non-invasive TLM and provided new insights into biological mechanism of chromosomal abnormality. The analyses of overall and subgroups of mosaic embryo transfer outcomes helped to optimize embryo transfer scheme for in-vitro fertilization procedures. Multi-center prospective studies with large sample sizes are warranted to validate our results in the future.

Implicit bias in diagnosing mosaicism amongst preimplantation genetic testing providers: results from a multicenter study of 36 395 blastocysts

STUDY QUESTION

Does the diagnosis of mosaicism affect ploidy rates across different providers offering preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Our analysis of 36 395 blastocyst biopsies across eight genetic testing laboratories revealed that euploidy rates were significantly higher in providers reporting low rates of mosaicism.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Diagnoses consistent with chromosomal mosaicism have emerged as a third category of possible embryo ploidy outcomes following PGT-A. However, in the era of mosaicism, embryo selection has become increasingly complex. Biological, technical, analytical, and clinical complexities in interpreting such results have led to substantial variability in mosaicism rates across PGT-A providers and clinics. Critically, it remains unknown whether these differences impact the number of euploid embryos available for transfer. Ultimately, this may significantly affect clinical outcomes, with important implications for PGT-A patients.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

In this international, multicenter cohort study, we reviewed 36 395 consecutive PGT-A results, obtained from 10 035 patients across 11 867 treatment cycles, conducted between October 2015 and October 2021. A total of 17 IVF centers, across eight PGT-A providers, five countries and three continents participated in the study. All blastocysts were tested using trophectoderm biopsy and next-generation sequencing. Both autologous and donation cycles were assessed. Cycles using preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements were excluded from the analysis.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

The PGT-A providers were randomly categorized (A to H). Providers B, C, D, E, F, G, and H all reported mosaicism, whereas Provider A reported embryos as either euploid or aneuploid. Ploidy rates were analyzed using multilevel mixed linear regression. Analyses were adjusted for maternal age, paternal age, oocyte source, number of embryos biopsied, day of biopsy, and PGT-A provider, as appropriate. We compared associations between genetic testing providers and PGT-A outcomes, including the number of chromosomally normal (euploid) embryos determined to be suitable for transfer.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The mean maternal age (±SD) across all providers was 36.2 (±5.2). Our findings reveal a strong association between PGT-A provider and the diagnosis of euploidy and mosaicism. Amongst the seven providers that reported mosaicism, the rates varied from 3.1% to 25.0%. After adjusting for confounders, we observed a significant difference in the likelihood of diagnosing mosaicism across providers (P < 0.001), ranging from 6.5% (95% CI: 5.2-7.4%) for Provider B to 35.6% (95% CI: 32.6-38.7%) for Provider E. Notably, adjusted euploidy rates were highest for providers that reported the lowest rates of mosaicism (Provider B: euploidy, 55.7% (95% CI: 54.1-57.4%), mosaicism, 6.5% (95% CI: 5.2-7.4%); Provider H: euploidy, 44.5% (95% CI: 43.6-45.4%), mosaicism, 9.9% (95% CI: 9.2-10.6%)); and Provider D: euploidy, 43.8% (95% CI: 39.2-48.4%), mosaicism, 11.0% (95% CI: 7.5-14.5%)). Moreover, the overall chance of having at least one euploid blastocyst available for transfer was significantly higher when mosaicism was not reported, when we compared Provider A to all other providers (OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.13-1.50). Differences in diagnosing and interpreting mosaic results across PGT-A laboratories raise further concerns regarding the accuracy and relevance of mosaicism predictions. While we confirmed equivalent clinical outcomes following the transfer of mosaic and euploid blastocysts, we found that a significant proportion of mosaic embryos are not used for IVF treatment.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Due to the retrospective nature of the study, associations can be ascertained, however, causality cannot be established. Certain parameters such as blastocyst grade were not available in the dataset. Furthermore, certain platform-related and clinic-specific factors may not be readily quantifiable or explicitly captured in our dataset. As such, a full elucidation of all potential confounders accounting for variability may not be possible.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Our findings highlight the strong need for standardization and quality assurance in the industry. The decision not to transfer mosaic embryos may ultimately reduce the chance of success of a PGT-A cycle by limiting the pool of available embryos. Until we can be certain that mosaic diagnoses accurately reflect biological variability, reporting mosaicism warrants utmost caution. A prudent approach is imperative, as it may determine the difference between success or failure for some patients.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This work was supported by the Torres Quevedo Grant, awarded to M.P. (PTQ2019-010494) by the Spanish State Research Agency, Ministry of Science and Innovation, Spain. M.P., L.B., A.R.L., A.L.R.d.C.L., N.P.P., M.P., D.S., F.A., A.P., B.M., L.D., F.V.M., D.S., M.R., E.P.d.l.B., A.R., and R.V. have no competing interests to declare. B.L., R.M., and J.A.O. are full time employees of IB Biotech, the genetics company of the Instituto Bernabeu group, which performs preimplantation genetic testing. M.G. is a full time employee of Novagen, the genetics company of Cegyr, which performs preimplantation genetic testing.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Current Applications and Controversies in Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidies (PGT-A) in In Vitro Fertilization

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) has evolved over recent years, including improvements in embryo culture, biopsy, transfer, and genetic testing. The application of new comprehensive chromosome screening analysis has improved the accuracy in determining the chromosomal status of the analyzed sample, but it has brought new challenges such as the management of partial aneuploidies and mosaicisms. For the past two decades, PGT-A has been involved in a controversy regarding its efficiency in improving IVF outcomes, despite its widespread worldwide implementation. Understanding the impact of embryo aneuploidy in IVF (in vitro fertilization) should theoretically allow improving reproductive outcomes. This review of the literature aims to describe the impact of aneuploidy in human reproduction and how PGT-A was introduced to overcome this obstacle in IVF (in vitro fertilization). The article will try to analyze and summarize the evolution of the PGT-A in the recent years, and its current applications and limitations, as well as the controversy it generates. Conflicting published data could indicate the lacking value of a single biopsied sample to determine embryo chromosomal status and/or the lack of standardized methods for embryo culture and management and genetic analysis among other factors. It has to be considered that PGT-A may not be a universal test to improve the reproductive potential in IVF patients, rather each clinic should evaluate the efficacy of PGT-A in their IVF program based on their population, skills, and limitations.

PGT-A mosaicism based on NGS intermediate copy numbers: is it time to stop reporting them?

Mosaicism represents a genuine real phenomenon, but its high prevalence and undisclosed clinical significance, stress the burden on genetic counseling and the management of PGT-A results. Even though the assumption of mosaicism from NGS intermediate chromosome copy number profiles may represent a reasonable interpretation, other potential technical reasons, including amplification bias, contamination, biopsy technique, or the analysis algorithms, may constitute alternative explanations. Thresholds confining mosaicism ranges are established according to models employing mixtures of normal and abnormal cells with steady conditions of quantity and quality which are unable to reflect the full extent of variability present in a trophectoderm (TE) biopsy specimen. When the concordance of TE with the ICM is considered, mosaic TE biopsies poorly correlate with the chromosomal status of the remaining embryo, displaying mostly ICM aneuploidy in cases of TE high-range mosaics diagnosis and euploidy when mosaicism grade in TE is less than 50% (low-mid range mosaicism), which implies an evident overestimation of mosaicism results. Indeed, a binary classification of NGS profiles that excludes mosaic ranges, including only euploid and aneuploid diagnosis, provides higher specificity and accuracy in identifying abnormal embryos and discarding them. As intermediate copy number profiles do not represent strong evidence of mosaicism but only an inaccurate and misleading assumption, and considering that no increased risk has been reported in the offspring, until diagnosis specificity is improved and its clinical implications are determined, laboratories should consider limiting predictions to euploid and aneuploid and stop reporting mosaicism.

Blinded rebiopsy and analysis of noneuploid embryos with 2 distinct preimplantation genetic testing platforms for aneuploidy

OBJECTIVE

To determine how often a noneuploid result from a single trophectoderm (TE) biopsy tested with the next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is concordant with rebiopsies tested with a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array-based PGT-A platform.

DESIGN

Blinded prospective cohort study.

SETTING

University-affiliated fertility center.

PATIENT(S)

One hundred blastocysts were chosen from donated samples; on TE biopsy with NGS-based PGT-A, 40 had at least one whole chromosome full copy number aneuploidy alone, 20 had a single whole chromosome intermediate copy number ("whole chromosome mosaic"), 20 had a single full segmental aneuploidy (segA), and 20 had a single segmental intermediate copy number ("segmental mosaic").

INTERVENTIONS

Four rebiopsies were collected from each embryo: 3 TE biopsies and the remaining embryo. Each rebiopsy was randomized, blinded, and assessed with an SNP array-based PGT-A platform that combines copy number and allele ratio analyses, without mosaicism reporting.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Concordance between the NGS result and rebiopsy results and within each embryo's blinded rebiopsy results.

RESULT(S)

Next-generation sequencing-diagnosed whole chromosome aneuploidy (WCA) was reconfirmed in 95% (95% confidence interval [CI], 83%-99%) of embryos; 2 embryos with NGS-diagnosed WCA were called euploid on all conclusive rebiopsies. Among embryos with NGS-diagnosed whole chromosome mosaicism, 35% (95% CI, 15%-59%) were called euploid and 15% (95% CI, 3%-38%) were called whole chromosome aneuploid on all conclusive rebiopsies. A total of 30% (95% CI, 12%-54%) of embryos with NGS-diagnosed segA and 65% (95% CI, 41%-85%) of embryos with NGS-diagnosed segmental mosaicism were called euploid on all conclusive rebiopsies. In total, 13% (95% CI, 6%-25%) of embryos with NGS-diagnosed full copy number aneuploidy and 50% (95% CI, 34%-66%) of embryos with NGS-diagnosed mosaicism had uniformly euploid SNP results. Conversely, all embryos with at least one noneuploid SNP result (n = 72) either had SNP-diagnosed aneuploidy on another rebiopsy from the same embryo or NGS-diagnosed aneuploidy/mosaicism involving the same chromosome.

CONCLUSION(S)

Next-generation sequencing-diagnosed WCA is highly concordant with rebiopsies tested with an SNP array-based PGT-A; however, whole chromosome mosaicism, segA, and segmental mosaicism are less concordant, reinforcing that embryos with these results may have reproductive potential and be suitable for transfer.

Accuracy and depth evaluation of clinical low pass genome sequencing in the detection of mosaic aneuploidies and CNVs

BACKGROUND

Low-pass genome sequencing (LP GS) has shown distinct advantages over traditional methods for the detection of mosaicism. However, no study has systematically evaluated the accuracy of LP GS in the detection of mosaic aneuploidies and copy number variants (CNVs) in prenatal diagnosis. Moreover, the influence of sequencing depth on mosaicism detection of LP GS has not been fully evaluated.

METHODS

To evaluate the accuracy of LP GS in the detection of mosaic aneuploidies and mosaic CNVs, 27 samples with known aneuploidies and CNVs and 1 negative female sample were used to generate 6 simulated samples and 21 virtual samples, each sample contained 9 different mosaic levels. Mosaic levels were simulated by pooling reads or DNA from each positive sample and the negative sample according to a series of percentages (ranging from 3 to 40%). Then, the influence of sequencing depth on LP GS in the detection of mosaic aneuploidies and CNVs was evaluated by downsampling.

RESULTS

To evaluate the accuracy of LP GS in the detection of mosaic aneuploidies and CNVs, a comparative analysis of mosaic levels was performed using 6 simulated samples and 21 virtual samples with 35 M million (M) uniquely aligned high-quality reads (UAHRs). For mosaic levels > 30%, the average difference (detected mosaic levels vs. theoretical mosaic levels) of 6 mosaic CNVs in simulated samples was 4.0%, and the average difference (detected mosaic levels vs. mosaic levels of Y chromosome) of 6 mosaic aneuploidies and 15 mosaic CNVs in virtual samples was 2.7%. Furthermore, LP GS had a higher detection rate and accuracy for the detection of mosaic aneuploidies and CNVs of larger sizes, especially mosaic aneuploidies. For depth evaluation, the results of LP GS in downsampling samples were compared with those of LP GS using 35 M UAHRs. The detection sensitivity of LP GS for 6 mosaic aneuploidies and 15 mosaic CNVs in virtual samples increased with UAHR. For mosaic levels > 30%, the total detection sensitivity reached a plateau at 30 M UAHRs. With 30 M UAHRs, the total detection sensitivity was 99.2% for virtual samples.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated the accuracy of LP GS in mosaicism detection using simulated data and virtual samples, respectively. Thirty M UAHRs (single-end 35 bp) were optimal for LP GS in the detection of mosaic aneuploidies and most mosaic CNVs larger than 1.48 Mb (Megabases) with mosaic levels > 30%. These results could provide a reference for laboratories that perform clinical LP GS in the detection of mosaic aneuploidies and CNVs.

Single-cell multi-omics sequencing reveals chromosome copy number inconsistency between trophectoderm and inner cell mass in human reconstituted embryos after spindle transfer

STUDY QUESTION

Is the chromosome copy number of the trophectoderm (TE) of a human reconstituted embryos after spindle transfer (ST) representative of the inner cell mass (ICM)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Single-cell multi-omics sequencing revealed that ST blastocysts have a higher proportion of cell lineages exhibiting intermediate mosaicism than conventional ICSI blastocysts, and that the TE of ST blastocysts does not represent the chromosome copy number of ICM.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) assumes that TE biopsies are representative of the ICM, but the TE and ICM originate from different cell lineages, and concordance between TE and ICM is not well-studied, especially in ST embryos.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

We recruited 30 infertile women who received treatment at our clinic and obtained 45 usable blastocysts (22 from conventional ICSI and 23 reconstituted embryos after ST). We performed single-cell multi-omics sequencing on all blastocysts to predict and verify copy number variations (CNVs) in each cell. We determined the chromosome copy number of each embryo by analysing the proportion of abnormal cells in each blastocyst. We used the Bland-Altman concordance and the Kappa test to evaluate the concordance between TE and ICM in the both groups.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

The study was conducted at a public tertiary hospital in China, where all the embryo operations, including oocytes retrieval, ST, and ICSI, were performed in the embryo laboratory. We utilized single-cell multi-omics sequencing technology at the Biomedical Pioneering Innovation Center, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, to analyse the blastocysts. Transcriptome sequencing was used to predict the CNV of each cell through bioinformatics analysis, and the results were validated using the DNA methylation library of each cell to confirm chromosomal normalcy. We conducted statistical analysis and graphical plotting using R 4.2.1, SPSS 27, and GraphPad Prism 9.3.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Mean age of the volunteers, the blastocyst morphology, and the developmental ratewere similar in ST and ICSI groups. The blastocysts in the ST group had some additional chromosomal types that were prone to variations beyond those enriched in the blastocysts of the ICSI group. Finally, both Bland-Altman concordance test and kappa concordancetest showed good chromosomal concordance between TE and ICM in the ICSI blastocysts (kappa = 0.659, P < 0.05), but not in ST blastocysts (P = 1.000), suggesting that the TE in reconstituted embryos is not representative of ICM. Gene functional annotation (GO and KEGG analyses) suggests that there may be new or additional pathways for CNV generation in ST embryos compared to ICSI embryos.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

This study was mainly limited by the small sample size and the limitations of single-cell multi-omics sequencing technology. To select eligible single cells, some cells of the embryos were eliminated or not labelled, resulting in a loss of information about them. The findings of this study are innovative and exploratory. A larger sample size of human embryos (especially ST embryos) and more accurate molecular genetics techniques for detecting CNV in single cells are needed to validate our results.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Our study justifies the routine clinical use of PGT-A in ICSI blastocysts, as we found that the TE is a good substitute for ICM in predicting chromosomal abnormalities. While PGT-A is not entirely accurate, our data demonstrate good clinical feasibility. This trial was able to provide correct genetic counselling to patients regarding the reliability of PGT-A. Regarding ST blastocysts, the increased mosaicism rate and the inability of the TE to represent the chromosomal copy number of the ICM are both biological characteristics that differentiate them from ICSI blastocysts. Currently, ST is not used clinically on a large scale to produce blastocysts. However, if ST becomes more widely used in the future, our study will be the first to demonstrate that the use of PGT-A in ST blastocysts may not be as accurate as PGT-A for ICSI blastocysts.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This study was supported by grants from the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFA0107601) and the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC1003003). The authors declare no conflict of interest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Evaluation of pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy outcomes in patients without infertility undergoing in vitro fertilization compared to infertile controls

PURPOSE

To evaluate pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) outcomes in patients without infertility compared to infertile patients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients without an infertility diagnosis ("fertile" patients) who utilized PGT-A at a large university-affiliated fertility center between 2016 and 2021. Fertile patients were 1-to-3 matched to infertile controls by age and number of oocytes retrieved. The primary outcome was blastocyst aneuploidy rate. Secondary outcomes included ovarian reserve markers, laboratory outcomes, and other PGT-A outcomes [rates of euploidy, mosaicism, and potentially transferrable (euploid + mosaic) embryos].

RESULTS

283 fertile and 849 infertile patients were included. Median age, anti-Mullerian hormone, and day 2 estradiol levels were equivalent among groups; day 2 follicle-stimulating hormone levels were higher in fertile patients (6.9 vs. 6.5 IU/mL, p < 0.01). The aneuploidy rate was similar among fertile and infertile patients (33.7% vs. 31.8%, p = 0.11); the euploidy rate was higher (50.8% vs. 47.0%, p < 0.01), and the mosaicism rate was lower in fertile patients (13.3% vs. 19.2%, p < 0.01). The rate of transferrable embryos was similar among groups (64.0% vs. 66.3%, p = 0.07), as was the percentage of patients yielding ≥ 1 euploid embryo (90.1% vs. 87.3%, p = 0.25). When controlling for significant covariates, multiple linear regression showed that aneuploidy rate was equivalent in both cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Aneuploidy rate was similar in fertile and infertile patients. Fertile patients had slightly higher euploidy and lower mosaicism than infertile patients. Still, compared to fertile patients, infertile patients had equivalent rates of transferrable embryos and were just as likely to yield ≥ 1 euploid embryo.

Clinical management of mosaic results from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy of blastocysts: a committee opinion

This revised document incorporates a growing number of published studies about mosaic embryo transfer and provides current evidence-based considerations for the clinical management of embryos with mosaic results on preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. This document replaces the document titled "Clinical management of mosaic results from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) of blastocysts: a committee opinion," published in 2020 (Fertil Steril 2020;114:246-54).

Chromosomal, gestational, and neonatal outcomes of embryos classified as a mosaic by preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy

OBJECTIVE

To understand the clinical risks associated with the transfer of embryos classified as a mosaic using preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.

DESIGN

Analysis of data collected between 2017 and 2023.

SETTING

Multicenter.

PATIENTS

Patients of infertility treatment.

INTERVENTION

Comparison of pregnancies resulting from embryos classified as euploid or mosaic using the 20%-80% interval in chromosomal intermediate copy numbers to define a mosaic result.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Rates of spontaneous abortion, birth weight, length of gestation, incidence of birth defects, and chromosomal status during gestation.

RESULTS

Implanted euploid embryos had a significantly lower risk of spontaneous abortion compared with mosaic embryos (8.9% [n = 8,672; 95% confidence interval {CI95} 8.3, 9.5] vs. 22.2% [n = 914; CI95 19.6, 25.0]). Embryos with mosaicism affecting whole chromosomes (not segmental) had the highest risk of spontaneous abortion (27.6% [n = 395; CI95 23.2, 32.3]). Infants born from euploid, mosaic, and whole chromosome mosaic embryos had average birth weights and lengths of gestation that were not statistically different (3,118 g and 267 days [n = 488; CI95 3,067, 3,169, and 266, 268], 3052 g and 265 days [n = 488; CI95 2,993, 3,112, and 264,267], 3,159 g and 268 days [n = 194; CI95 3,070, 3,249, and 266,270], respectively). Out of 488 infants from mosaic embryo transfers (ETs), one had overt gross abnormalities as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Most prenatal tests performed on pregnancies from mosaic ETs had normal results, and only three pregnancies produced prenatal test results reflecting the mosaicism detected at the embryonic stage (3 out of 250, 1.2%; CI95 0.25, 3.5).

CONCLUSION

Although embryos classified as mosaic experience higher rates of miscarriage than euploid embryos (with a particularly high frequency shortly after implantation), infants born of mosaic ETs are similar to infants of euploid ETs. Prenatal testing indicates that mosaicism resolves during most pregnancies, although this process is not perfectly efficient. In a small percentage of cases, the mosaicism persists through gestation. These findings can serve as risk-benefit considerations for mosaic ETs in the fertility clinic.

Overview of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) for the Detection of Fetal Chromosome Abnormalities; Differences in Laboratory Methods and Scope of Testing

Although nearly all noninvasive prenatal testing is currently based on analyzing circulating maternal cell-free DNA, the technical methods usedvary considerably. We review the different methods. Based on validation trials and clinical experience, there are mostly relatively small differences in screening performance for trisomies 21, 18, and 13 in singleton pregnancies. Recent reports show low no-call rates for all methods, diminishing its importance when choosing a laboratory. However, method can be an important consideration for twin pregnancies, screening for sex chromosome abnormalities, microdeletion syndromes, triploidy, molar pregnancies, rare autosomal trisomies, and segmental imbalances, and detecting maternal chromosome abnormalities.

Human embryo live imaging reveals nuclear DNA shedding during blastocyst expansion and biopsy

Proper preimplantation development is essential to assemble a blastocyst capable of implantation. Live imaging has uncovered major events driving early development in mouse embryos; yet, studies in humans have been limited by restrictions on genetic manipulation and lack of imaging approaches. We have overcome this barrier by combining fluorescent dyes with live imaging to reveal the dynamics of chromosome segregation, compaction, polarization, blastocyst formation, and hatching in the human embryo. We also show that blastocyst expansion mechanically constrains trophectoderm cells, causing nuclear budding and DNA shedding into the cytoplasm. Furthermore, cells with lower perinuclear keratin levels are more prone to undergo DNA loss. Moreover, applying trophectoderm biopsy, a mechanical procedure performed clinically for genetic testing, increases DNA shedding. Thus, our work reveals distinct processes underlying human development compared with mouse and suggests that aneuploidies in human embryos may not only originate from chromosome segregation errors during mitosis but also from nuclear DNA shedding.

Chromosomal Aberrations As a Biological Phenomenon in Human Embryonic Development

Frequent chromosomal abnormalities are a distinctive feature of early embryonic development in mammals, especially humans. Aneuploidy is considered as a contributing factor to failed embryo implantation and spontaneous abortions. In the case of chromosomal mosaicism, its effect on the potency of embryos to normally develop has not been sufficiently studied. Although, a significant percentage of chromosomal defects in early human embryos are currently believed to be associated with the features of clinical and laboratory protocols, in this review, we focus on the biological mechanisms associated with chromosomal abnormalities. In particular, we address the main events in oocyte meiosis that affects not only the genetic status of an unfertilized oocyte, but also further embryo viability, and analyze the features of first cleavage divisions and the causes of frequent chromosomal errors in early embryonic development. In addition, we discuss current data on self-correction of the chromosomal status in early embryos.

A review of the 2021/2022 PGDIS Position Statement on the transfer of mosaic embryos

The practice of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in association with in vitro fertilization (IVF) since 2016 has been mostly directed by three highly controversial guidance documents issued by the Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis International Society (PGDIS). Because these documents are so influential on worldwide IVF practice, the most recent one is here the subject of a detailed review, again revealing important misrepresentations and internal contradictions. Most importantly, however, this most recent guidance document still does not prevent the non-use and/or disposal of large numbers of embryos with substantial pregnancy and live-birth potential and, therefore, continues to propagate an IVF practice harmful to many infertile women.

Does PGT-A affect cumulative live birth rate?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Preimplantation genetic testing for the purpose of aneuploidy screening (PGT-A) has increased in use over the last decade.

RECENT FINDINGS

Whether PGT-A benefits all of the patients that choose to employ it has been a concern, as recent studies have highlighted a potential decrease in cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) for younger patients undergoing embryo transfer. However, there are limitations to many of these studies and the intended benefit of PGT-A, which is to aid as a selection tool, thus increasing the live birth rate per transfer, must not be ignored.

SUMMARY

PGT-A was never intended to increase CLBR. The purpose of PGT-A is to maximize the chance at live birth per transfer while minimizing the risk of clinical miscarriage, ongoing aneuploid pregnancy and futile transfers. However, if it harms CLBR in the process that has to be taken into consideration. This review will discuss PGT-A in terms of its benefits, risks, and how it has been shown to affect the cumulative live birth rate within in-vitro fertilization cycles.

Previously reported and here added cases demonstrate euploid pregnancies followed by PGT-A as "mosaic" as well as "aneuploid" designated embryos

BACKGROUND

After the longest time opposing all transfers of embryos by preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) diagnosed as "chromosomal-abnormal," the field has over recent years slowly been moving toward selective transfers of by PGT-A as "mosaic" diagnosed embryos, but is still rejecting transfers of embryos by PGT-A defined as "aneuploid."

METHODS

Upon review of the literature, we report published cases of euploid pregnancies following transfers of PGT-A as "aneuploid" diagnosed embryos and add several additional, ongoing cases at our center.

RESULTS

Among the published cases from our center, we identified seven euploid pregnancies from "aneuploid" embryos, four of which preceded the PGT-A industry's 2016 switch from binary "euploid" - "aneuploid" reporting to "euploid," "mosaic," and "aneuploid" reporting. That those four cases post 2016 PGT-A definition involving "mosaic" embryos, therefore, cannot be ruled out. Since then, we recently established three additional ongoing pregnancies from transfers of "aneuploid" embryos which still await confirmation of euploidy after delivery. A recent fourth pregnancy from the transfer of a trisomy 9 embryo miscarried before a fetal heart. Outside our own center's experience, the literature revealed only one additional such transfer, involving PGT-A as a "chaotic-aneuploid" diagnosed embryo with six abnormalities, leading to normal euploid delivery. In reviewing the literature, we furthermore demonstrate why current PGT-A reporting that differentiates between "mosaic" and "aneuploid" embryos based on relative percentages of euploid and aneuploid DNA in a single trophectoderm biopsy of on average 5-6 cells, is biologically non-sensical.

CONCLUSION

Basic biological evidence and a clinically still very limited experience with transfers of PGT-A as "aneuploid" labeled embryos demonstrate beyond reasonable doubt that at least some "aneuploid" embryos can lead to healthy euploid births. Therefore, this observation establishes beyond reasonable doubt that the rejection of all "aneuploid" embryos from transfer reduces pregnancy and live birth chances for IVF patients. Whether (and to what possible degree) pregnancy and live birth chances differ between "mosaic" and "aneuploid" embryos, remains to be determined. The answer will likely depend on the aneuploidy(ies) of an embryo and to what degree percentages of "mosaicism" in a single, on average 5/6-cell trophectoderm biopsy can reflect the ploidy-status of a complete embryo.

Concordance of PGT for aneuploidies between blastocyst biopsies and spent blastocyst culture medium

RESEARCH QUESTION

Non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (niPGT-A) avoids the possible detrimental impact of invasive PGT-A on embryo development and clinical outcomes. Does cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from spent blastocyst culture medium (BCM) reflect embryonic chromosome status better than trophectoderm (TE) biopsy?

DESIGN

In this study, 35 donated embryos were used for research and the BCM, TE biopsy, inner cell mass (ICM) and residual blastocyst (RB) were individually picked up from these embryos. Whole genome amplification (WGA) was performed and amplified DNA was subject to next-generation sequencing. Chromosome status concordance was compared among the groups of samples.

RESULTS

The WGA success rates were 97.0% (TE biopsy), 100% (ICM), 97.0% (RB) and 88.6% (BCM). Using ICM as the gold standard, the chromosomal ploidy concordance rates for BCM, TE biopsy and RB were 58.33% (14/24), 68.75% (22/32) and 78.57% (22/28); the diagnostic concordance rates were 83.33% (20/24), 87.50% (28/32) and 92.86% (26/28); and the sex concordance rates were 92.31% (24/26), 100% (32/32) and 100% (28/28), respectively. Considering RB the gold standard, the chromosome ploidy concordance rates for BCM and TE biopsy were 61.90% (13/21) and 81.48% (22/27); the diagnostic concordance rates were 71.43% (15/21) and 88.89% (24/27); and the sex concordance rates were 91.30% (21/23) and 100% (27/27), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of niPGT-A of cfDNA of spent BCM are comparable to those of invasive PGT-A of TE biopsies. Modifications of embryo culture conditions and testing methods will help reduce maternal DNA contamination and improve the reliability of niPGT-A.

Two clinical case reports of embryonic mosaicism identified with PGT-A persisting during pregnancy as true fetal mosaicism

The health risks associated with transferring embryos classified as mosaic by preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) are currently unknown. Such embryos produce PGT-A results indicating the presence of both euploid and aneuploid cells and have historically been deselected from transfer and grouped with uniformly aneuploid embryos as 'abnormal'. In recent years, numerous groups have reported the intentional transfer of mosaic embryos in the absence of uniformly euploid embryos, largely observing births of seemingly healthy babies. However, it remains to be understood whether the embryonic mosaicism invariably becomes resolved during the ensuing pregnancy, or whether the placenta and/or fetal tissues retain aneuploid cells, and if so to what potential clinical effect. Here, we report two cases of mosaicism persisting from the embryonic stage to the established pregnancy. Case 1 involved an embryonic low-level segmental mosaic loss in Chromosome (Chr) 1, which was confirmed in amniocentesis as well as in brain tissue of the products of conception. This pregnancy was terminated due to the chromosomal pathologies associated with 1p36 deletion syndrome, such as severe intellectual disability. Case 2 involved a low-level mosaic Chr 21 trisomy, which was confirmed with chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis. The ensuing pregnancy was terminated after ultrasound identification of severe abnormalities in the placenta and fetus. Together, these two cases should be taken into account for risk-benefit assessments of prospective mosaic embryo transfers.

Mosaic results after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy may be accompanied by changes in global gene expression

Aneuploidy in preimplantation embryos is a major cause of human reproductive failure. Unlike uniformly aneuploid embryos, embryos diagnosed as diploid-aneuploid mosaics after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) can develop into healthy infants. However, the reason why these embryos achieve full reproductive competence needs further research. Current RNA sequencing techniques allow for the investigation of the human preimplantation transcriptome, providing new insights into the molecular mechanisms of embryo development. In this prospective study, using euploid embryo gene expression as a control, we compared the transcriptome profiles of inner cell mass and trophectoderm samples from blastocysts with different levels of chromosomal mosaicism. A total of 25 samples were analyzed from 14 blastocysts with previous PGT-A diagnosis, including five low-level mosaic embryos and four high-level mosaic embryos. Global gene expression profiles visualized in cluster heatmaps were correlated with the original PGT-A diagnosis. In addition, gene expression distance based on the number of differentially expressed genes increased with the mosaic level, compared to euploid controls. Pathways involving apoptosis, mitosis, protein degradation, metabolism, and mitochondrial energy production were among the most deregulated within mosaic embryos. Retrospective analysis of the duration of blastomere cell cycles in mosaic embryos revealed several mitotic delays compared to euploid controls, providing additional evidence of the mosaic status. Overall, these findings suggest that embryos with mosaic results are not simply a misdiagnosis by-product, but may also have a genuine molecular identity that is compatible with their reproductive potential.

Do reproductive history and information given through genetic counselling influence patients' decisions on mosaic embryo transfer?

OBJECTIVE

To assess patients' and embryonic characteristics that may have an influence on the decision to transfer a mosaic embryo.

METHOD

Single centre retrospective cohort study including 1247 PGT-A cycles. Demographic and clinical factors associated with a decision to transfer a mosaic embryo were studied. Female age, number of previous cycles, previous availability of euploid embryos, history of miscarriages and parity as well as percentage of mosaicism, type of anomaly and chromosome risk were studied in relation to decision-making. Outcomes after mosaic embryo transfer were assessed.

RESULTS

To date, in 7.9% of cycles (99/1247), patients have had to make a decision on the fate of their mosaic embryos. In 23.2% of cycles (23/99), patients decided to transfer. In most cases (79.8%; 79/99), patients underwent genetic counselling before the decision. None of the variables analysed were associated with the patients' decision, although parity and the high-degree mosaicism (>50%) seemed to be negatively associated with the decision to transfer (18.2% vs. 29.8%, p = 0.294; 10% vs. 32.2%, p = 0.052).

CONCLUSIONS

Neither reproductive history nor information on mosaic embryo characteristics through counselling seems to be determinative for patients when deciding to transfer a mosaic embryo. Promising and increasing data on clinical outcomes after mosaic embryo transfer will be of utmost importance to soften risk perception regarding mosaic embryos and give a better, simplified and more evidence-based counselling.

Elucidating the PGT-A paradox: marginalising the detriment relegates the benefit

The hypothetical analysis presented offers insight into the effect of maternal age and protocol on the cost-effectiveness of PGT-A to reduce the risk of clinical miscarriage without materially jeopardising the chance of a first live birth when attempting to transfer every suitable embryo one at a time. Reflecting current practices, the diagnostic accuracy of PGT-A is sensitive to the prevalence of embryos with chromosome aneuploidy which increases with advancing maternal age, and the power of the test to discern a non-viable embryo is higher for older women and sensitive to protocol. PGT-A is effective to mitigate (reduce not eliminate) the risk of clinical miscarriage; however, excluding embryos with intermediate copy number results from transfer is detrimental to accomplishing a first live birth from a full cycle. Paradoxically, the number of blastocysts needed to marginalise the detriment is achieved only for some younger women (≤ 40 years) who are less likely to benefit by avoiding pregnancy loss; this also makes PGT-A an expensive adjuvant. The paradox can be avoided by excluding from transfer only embryos with a 'uniform' aneuploid test result, which mitigates the risk of miscarriage for all women with the potential to be cost-effective for those > 40 years.

Majority of transferred mosaic embryos developed healthy live births revealed by a preclinical study using embryonic morphology assessment and noninvasive PGT-A on cell-free DNA in blastocoel fluid

PURPOSE

This preclinical study aimed to evaluate whether using transferred mosaic embryos (primarily selected by embryonic morphology assessment (EMA) and compared by the noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (niPGT-A) on cell-free DNA in blastocoel fluid (BF)) increases the rates of clinical pregnancies (CPs) and healthy live births (HLBs) and to investigate whether niPGT-A could provide valuable genetic information for the EMA-selected transferred mosaic embryos.

METHODS

This study collected 215 blastocyst culture samples and 182 BF samples. Cell-free DNA from the BF was amplified and examined by next-generation sequencing-based niPGT-A. All 182 patients underwent EMA. However, only 147 underwent in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer, and only 113 clinical outcomes were followed up. Comprehensive chromosome screening for the chorionic villus sampling of spontaneous miscarriages and noninvasive prenatal testing for ongoing pregnancies were also performed.

RESULTS

The implantation rate was 77.55% in 147 transferred high-quality embryos selected by EMA. Among 113 CPs, 16 led to spontaneous miscarriage (14.16%), and 97 resulted in HLBs (85.84%). According to the niPGT-A results for 113 patients with clinical outcomes, 80.4% had CP (euploid, 20.54%; single aneuploid, 1.79%; mosaic chromosome aneuploid and/or segmental aneuploid, 58.04%). Of all the mosaic aneuploids, 90.76% were false positive, transforming to euploid.

CONCLUSIONS

Transferred EMA-selected embryos showed higher implantation rates. The niPGT-A of BF provided valuable genetic status ("-ploid") information, which helped reduce aneuploid-induced implantation failure and miscarriage, thereby increasing the CP and HLB rates. Additionally, majority of the transferred embryos with complex/chaotic mosaic aneuploid would likely develop HLBs.

Comment on the recent PGDIS Position Statement on the Transfer of Mosaic Embryos 2021

The worldwide demand of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is still growing. However, chromosomal mosaic results greatly challenge the clinical practice. The recently published PGDIS Position Statement on the Transfer of Mosaic Embryos is the third PGDIS position statement on how to deal with embryos diagnosed as chromosomal mosaics (CM) and, one of many attempts of different societies and working groups to provide a guideline for clinicians, laboratories, clinics, and genetic counselors. But still, as in previous statements, many issues remained unresolved. Moreover, from our point of view, the question how to deal with embryos diagnosed as CM, consisting of two or more karyological cell lines cannot be separated from all the other aspects of PGT-A including its accuracy. The paucity of clearcut indications for PGT-A and evidence of benefit as well as an overall cost-benefit assessment is given below.

Do chromosomal inversion carriers really need preimplantation genetic testing?

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the rates of euploidy, aneuploidy, and mosaicism in preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) cycles from chromosomal inversion carriers. In addition, this work also focused on assessing the impact of some contributors on the incidence of parental originating aneuploidy and mosaicism.

METHODS

This retrospective review enrolled chromosomal inversion carrier couples of whom the females were under 38 years old undergoing PGT-SR at a single academic reproductive center. Subgroups were divided according to the gender of carriers, the inversion type, and the semen parameters of male carriers (male factor infertility (MF) or non-MF). Patient demographics, cycle characteristics, and PGT-SR outcomes were compared among subgroups.

RESULTS

A total of 71 PGT-SR cycles from 57 inversion carrier couples were included for analysis. Among the 283 blastocysts, 48.4% were identified as euploidy, 27.9% as aneuploidy, and the remaining 23.7% as mosaicism. Only 32.9% of aneuploid embryos and 1.5% of mosaic embryos involved the parental inversion chromosomes. Notably, the female inversion carriers seemed to produce more parental originating aneuploid embryos than male inversion carriers (45.5% vs 23.9%, p = 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

The type of inversion and sperm parameters of male chromosomal inversion carriers did not affect the ploidy status of embryos. The incidence of parental originating aneuploidy in inversion carrier couples is lower than expected. For male chromosomal inversion carriers with normal sperm condition whose female partners are under 38 years old, natural conception combined with prenatal diagnosis could be provided as an option during fertility counseling.

ESHRE Working Group on Chromosomal Mosaicism, De Rycke M, Capalbo A, Coonen E, Coticchio G, Fiorentino F, Goossens V, Mcheik S, Rubio C, Sermon K, Sfontouris I, Spits C, Vermeesch JR, Vermeulen N, Wells D, Zambelli F, Kakourou G. ESHRE survey results and good practice recommendations on managing chromosomal mosaicism

STUDY QUESTION

How should ART/preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) centres manage the detection of chromosomal mosaicism following PGT?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Thirty good practice recommendations were formulated that can be used by ART/PGT centres as a basis for their own policy with regards to the management of ‘mosaic’ embryos.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

The use of comprehensive chromosome screening technologies has provided a variety of data on the incidence of chromosomal mosaicism at the preimplantation stage of development and evidence is accumulating that clarifies the clinical outcomes after transfer of embryos with putative mosaic results, with regards to implantation, miscarriage and live birth rates, and neonatal outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This document was developed according to a predefined methodology for ESHRE good practice recommendations. Recommendations are supported by data from the literature, a large survey evaluating current practice and published guidance documents. The literature search was performed using PubMed and focused on studies published between 2010 and 2022. The survey was performed through a web-based questionnaire distributed to members of the ESHRE special interest groups (SIG) Reproductive Genetics and Embryology, and the ESHRE PGT Consortium members. It included questions on ART and PGT, reporting, embryo transfer policy and follow-up of transfers. The final dataset represents 239 centres.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

The working group (WG) included 16 members with expertise on the ART/PGT process and chromosomal mosaicism. The recommendations for clinical practice were formulated based on the expert opinion of the WG, while taking into consideration the published data and results of the survey.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Eighty percent of centres that biopsy three or more cells report mosaicism, even though only 66.9% of all centres have validated their technology and only 61.8% of these have validated specifically for the calling of chromosomal mosaicism. The criteria for designating mosaicism, reporting and transfer policies vary significantly across the centres replying to the survey. The WG formulated recommendations on how to manage the detection of chromosomal mosaicism in clinical practice, considering validation, risk assessment, designating and reporting mosaicism, embryo transfer policies, prenatal testing and follow-up. Guidance is also provided on the essential elements that should constitute the consent forms and the genetic report, and that should be covered in genetic counselling. As there are several unknowns in chromosomal mosaicism, it is recommended that PGT centres monitor emerging data on the topic and adapt or refine their policy whenever new insights are available from evidence.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Rather than providing instant standardized advice, the recommendations should help ART/PGT centres in developing their own policy towards the management of putative mosaic embryos in clinical practice.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This document will help facilitate a more knowledge-based approach for dealing with chromosomal mosaicism in different centres. In addition to recommendations for clinical practice, recommendations for future research were formulated. Following up on these will direct research towards existing research gaps with direct translation to clinical practice. Emerging data will help in improving guidance, and a more evidence-based approach of managing chromosomal mosaicism.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The WG received technical support from ESHRE. M.D.R. participated in the EQA special advisory group, outside the submitted work, and is the chair of the PGT WG of the Belgian society for human genetics. D.W. declared receiving salary from Juno Genetics, UK. A.C. is an employee of Igenomix, Italy and C.R. is an employee of Igenomix, Spain. C.S. received a research grant from FWO, Belgium, not related to the submitted work. I.S. declared being a Co-founder of IVFvision Ltd, UK. J.R.V. declared patents related to ‘Methods for haplotyping single-cells’ and ‘Haplotyping and copy number typing using polymorphic variant allelic frequencies’, and being a board member of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis International Society (PGDIS) and International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis (ISPD). K.S. reported being Chair-elect of ESHRE. The other authors had nothing to disclose.

DISCLAIMER

This Good Practice Recommendations (GPR) document represents the views of ESHRE, which are the result of consensus between the relevant ESHRE stakeholders and are based on the scientific evidence available at the time of preparation. 

ESHRE GPRs should be used for information and educational purposes. They should not be interpreted as setting a standard of care or be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care, or be exclusive of other methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. They do not replace the need for application of clinical judgement to each individual presentation, or variations based on locality and facility type. 

Furthermore, ESHRE GPRs do not constitute or imply the endorsement, or favouring, of any of the included technologies by ESHRE.