Validity of the KLIC and CRIME80 scores in predicting failure in late acute infection treated by debridement and implant retention

DAIR for periprosthetic joint infections-One week to save the joint?

BACKGROUND

Predicting the success of a Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention (DAIR) procedure for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) for hip and knee joint arthroplasty remains a challenge. A failed DAIR might adversely affect the outcome of any future revision surgery for PJI. Hence, the ability to identify and optimize factors predictive of DAIR success would help target the procedure to the appropriate patient cohort and avoid unnecessary surgery for patients where a DAIR is unlikely to eradicate infection.

METHODS

A retrospective review of our prospective Bone Infection Group database was performed to identify all patients who underwent a DAIR of their primary or revision hip or knee arthroplasty. All patients had a confirmed PJI as per MSIS 2013 criteria and an outcome according to the MSIS working group outcome-reporting tool. DAIR surgery was then grouped into groups of "successful" or "unsuccessful" outcomes.

RESULTS

Sixty-four consecutive patients with an acute PJI underwent a DAIR procedure between 2009 and 2020, with 46 procedures performed for knees and 18 for hips. Treatment was successful in 69% (37 knees and 7 hips). The chance of a successful DAIR was significantly greater if performed at or within one week of symptom onset compared to greater than one-week duration (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.11; P = 0.027; 95% CI [0.02-0.78])). For DAIR performed at or within one week of symptom onset, the success rate was 93% for knees and 80% for hips. The chance of a successful DAIR however was not influenced by whether the surgeon was an arthroplasty or non-arthroplasty surgeon (OR 0.28; P = 0.13; 95% CI [0.05-1.48])). Isolated Streptococcus infection had a success rate of 100%. Next came Coagulase-negative Staphylococci (71%) and Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus (65%). Polymicrobial infection had the worst outcome, with a success rate of 40%.

CONCLUSION

In our experience, DAIR surgery performed within one week of symptom onset significantly increased the chance of successful infection eradication. Collaborative work is required to ensure arthroplasty patients can access prompt appropriate surgical decision-making as soon as concerns arise, remove barriers to early assessment and minimise delays to surgery.

Periprosthetic joint infection in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: treatment options and outcomes. What is the current evidence in literature?

INTRODUCTION

Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) following unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKAs) will increase. The aim of this review is to evaluate current evidence regarding treatment options, complications, clinical and radiological outcomes of PJI management in UKAs.

METHODS

A systematic review of English literature was performed. Retrospective and prospective studies providing treatment options, complications, clinical and radiological outcomes of PJI following UKAs were included. PJI type, treatment, survival rate with no reoperation for infection and survival rate with no reoperation for any cause were evaluated.

RESULTS

Eleven articles were included. Three studies focusing on PJI following UKA (45 cases) report a survival rate with no reoperation for infection of 68.9% and a survival rate with no reoperation for any cause of 48.9%. Eight articles concerning UKA failure modes (28 cases) overestimate survival rate with no reoperation for infection (88.9%) and survival rate with no reoperation for any cause (88.9%) (p < 0.05). DAIR reports a rate of infection eradication failure ranging from 43.8 to 100%. 1SE allows for a survival rate with no reoperation for infection of 100%. 2SE reports a rate of infection eradication failure ranging from 0 to 12.5%. A high rate of early aseptic reoperation is reported, despite infection eradication (20% in DAIR; 28.5% in 2SE).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment strategy is determined by symptom timing, PJI type (acute vs chronic), causative organism, patient's comorbidities. A longer duration of PJI or severe host and extremity status seems to require 2SE or 1SE. Patients who have a shorter duration of PJI could receive DAIR.

Accuracy of a Novel Preoperative Failure Risk Model for Debridement Antibiotics and Implant Retention (DAIR) in Acute Prosthetic Joint Infection

Given the variable success of the debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) procedure in patients with acute prosthetic joint infection (PJI), an accurate selection of candidates is critical. In this study, we set about calculating the predictive value of a novel algorithm for predicting outcome following DAIR developed by Shohat et al. Sixty-four patients who underwent debridement for (early and late) acute PJI in a tertiary-level university hospital were selected, and the aforementioned algorithm was retrospectively applied. Patients with model scores of 40−50%, 50−60%, 60−70%, 70−80% and 80−90% displayed success rates of 33.34%, 41.18%, 57.9%, 78.27% and 100%, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed an area under the curve of 0.69. The calibration intercept value was 0, and the calibration slope value was 1. Failure rates were significantly higher for the following variables: revision surgery (p = 0.012) index surgery for reasons other than osteoarthritis (p = 0.01), and C-reactive protein level >30 mg/L (p = 0.042). This analysis demonstrated that the Shohat algorithm is associated with an optimal calibration value and a moderate predictive value for failure of a DAIR procedure in patients with acute PJI. Its validation is recommended before it can be routinely applied in daily practice.