New treatment strategy for endometriosis using progestin-primed ovarian stimulation with dienogest: A prospective cohort study, comparison of dienogest versus dydrogesterone

Progestin primed ovarian stimulation using dydrogesterone from day 7 of the cycle onwards in oocyte donation cycles: a longitudinal study

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol with dydrogesterone from cycle day 7 yield similar outcomes compared with a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol in the same oocyte donors?

DESIGN

This retrospective longitudinal study included 128 cycles from 64 oocyte donors. All oocyte donors had the same type of gonadotrophin and daily dose in both stimulation cycles. The primary outcome was the number of cumulus-oocyte complexes (COC) retrieved.

RESULTS

The number of COC retrieved (mean ± SD 19.7 ± 10.8 versus 19.2 ± 8.3; P = 0.5) and the number of metaphase II oocytes (15.5 ± 8.4 versus 16.2 ± 7.0; P = 0.19) were similar for the PPOS and GnRH antagonist protocols, respectively. The duration of stimulation (10.5 ± 1.5 days versus 10.8 ± 1.5 days; P = 0.14) and consumption of gonadotrophins (2271.9 ± 429.7 IU versus 2321.5 ± 403.4 IU; P = 0.2) were also comparable, without any cases of premature ovulation. Nevertheless, there was a significant difference in the total cost of medication per cycle: €898.3 ± 169.9 for the PPOS protocol versus €1196.4 ± 207.5 (P < 0.001) for the GnRH antagonist protocol.

CONCLUSION

The number of oocytes retrieved and number of metaphase II oocytes were comparable in both stimulation protocols, with the advantage of significant cost reduction in favour of the PPOS protocol compared with the GnRH antagonist protocol. No cases of premature ovulation were observed, even when progestin was started later in the stimulation.

Endometrial receptivity in women with endometriosis

As endometriosis is recognized as a contributing factor to infertility, prompting couples to embark on Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) treatments, it becomes crucial to comprehend the extent and way this condition can affect success rates. Natural conception data reveal lower success rates for women with endometriosis, yet the same cannot be extrapolated to the outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF). In recent years, advancements in the ART process, particularly the distinct stages of the IVF pathway and investigations into embryo quality have shown a comparable rate of embryonic quality and chromosomal normalcy (euploidy) between embryos obtained from individuals with or without endometriosis. Thus, the primary question that lingers relates to the functionality of the endometrium. This review addresses whether endometriosis can influence endometrial receptivity and implantation rates.

Comparison of Dydrogesterone and GnRH-a Effects After Laparoscopic Surgery in Patients with Stage III and IV Endometriosis

Objective

To compare the spontaneous pregnancy rates between dydrogesterone and Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) treatments in patients with endometriosis stage III and IV after laparoscopy.

Methods

The clinical data of patients with endometriosis stage III and IV administered laparoscopic surgery in our hospital from January 2018 to March 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Totally 151 cases were divided into two groups according to postoperative medication, including the study (70 cases) and control (81 cases) groups treated with dydrogesterone and GnRH-a, respectively. The spontaneous pregnancy and subsequent pregnancy outcomes were assessed within 12 months.

Results

Totally 49 patients had spontaneous pregnancy. Among them, there were 31 cases in the dydrogesterone group (spontaneous pregnancy rate of 44.3%, 31/70), including 25 live birth cases (35.7%, 25/70), 4 miscarriage cases, and 2 ectopic pregnancy cases. The time to conception was 1-10 months (median value of 5 months). Totally 18 cases in the GnRH-a group had spontaneous pregnancy (22.2%, 18/81), including 16 live birth cases (19.8%, 16/81). 81) and 2 miscarriage cases; the time to conception was 3-11 months (median value of 6 months). There were significant differences in spontaneous pregnancy rate and cumulative spontaneous pregnancy rate between the two groups (P = 0.005 and 0.003, respectively).

Conclusion

Dydrogesterone after laparoscopic surgery in patients with endometriosis stage III and IV improved the natural pregnancy rate.

Comparison of Cumulative Live Birth Rates between Flexible and Conventional Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol in Poor Ovarian Response Patients According to POSEIDON Criteria: A Cohort Study

RESEARCH QUESTION

To compare the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) per oocyte retrieval cycle of a conventional progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (cPPOS) regimen with a flexible progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (fPPOS) regimen in poor ovarian response patients, according to POSEIDON criteria.

DESIGN

Poor ovarian response women, according to POSEIDON criteria, who underwent the first PPOS protocol for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) between January 2018 and December 2020 were included. The fPPOS group involved 113 participants, and the cPPOS group included 1119 participants. In the cPPOS group, medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) (10 mg/d) was administrated on the gonadotropin injection the same day as gonadotropin injections in the cPPOS group, while MPA was started either on the day when the leading follicle with mean diameter > 12mm was present and/or serum E2 was >300 pg/mL in the fPPOS protocol group. The primary outcome was CLBR.

RESULTS

The fPPOS protocol had higher CLBR per oocyte retrieval cycle compared to the cPPOS group, even without a statistically significant difference (29.6% vs. 24.9%, p = 0.365). The fPPOS group had fewer numbers of retrieved oocytes (2.87 ± 2.03 vs. 3.76 ± 2.32, p < 0.001) but a higher MII oocyte rate (89.8% vs. 84.7%, p = 0.016). In addition, the number of available embryos in the two groups was comparable (1.37 ± 1.24 vs. 1.63 ± 1.38, p = 0.095). There were five women in the fPPOS group, and 86 women in the cPPOS group had a premature LH surge (4.2% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.261). In the fPPOS group, there was one instance of premature ovulation, while in the cPPOS group, there were six occurrences of premature ovulation (0.8 vs. 0.5%, p = 1.000).

CONCLUSION(S)

The novel fPPOS protocol appears to achieve higher CLBR even without significant differences and with MPA consumption compared with cPPOS protocol in low-prognosis patients.

Impact of dienogest pretreatment on IVF-ET outcomes in patients with endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To comprehensively evaluate the influence of dienogest (DNG) versus non-DNG pretreatment on in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) outcomes for patients with endometriosis.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang, and VIP were comprehensively searched for relevant publications until September 14, 2022. Primary outcomes included clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate. Secondary outcomes included retrieved oocytes, mature oocytes, blastocysts, growing follicles, transferrable embryos, fertilization rate, implantation rate, and miscarriage rate. Subgroup analysis was performed according to different grouping methods and embryo types.

RESULTS

Five studies of 568 females with endometriosis were involved in this systematic review and meta-analysis. DNG treatment exhibited similar effects to non-DNG treatment on either the primary or the secondary outcomes (all P > 0.05). The DNG group had a significantly greater clinical pregnancy rate than the non-hormonal treatment group (pooled relative risk [RR]: 2.055, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.275, 3.312, P = 0.003), and exhibited a significantly lower clinical pregnancy rate than the long gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) group (RR: 0.542, 95%CI: 0.321, 0.916, P = 0.022). For patients undergoing fresh embryo transfer, the DNG group displayed a significantly greater clinical pregnancy rate versus the non-DNG group (pooled RR: 1.848, 95%CI: 1.234, 2.767, P = 0.003). Patients receiving DNG had a significantly greater live birth rate than those with non-hormonal treatment (pooled RR: 2.136, 95%CI: 1.223, 3.734, P = 0.008), while having a significantly lower live birth rate than the long GnRH-a group (RR: 0.441, 95%CI: 0.214, 0.907, P = 0.026). While using fresh embryos, patients with DNG treatment had an increased live birth rate, compared with those without DNG treatment (pooled RR: 2.132, 95%CI: 1.090, 4.169, P = 0.027).

CONCLUSION

DNG treatment may have similar effects to non-DNG treatment on IVF-ET outcomes. The clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate after DNG treatment may be significantly higher than those after non-hormonal treatment. More evidence is warranted to corroborate these findings.

Chlormadinone acetate in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation does not negatively affect clinical results

Purpose

To investigate whether progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) with chlormadinone acetate (CMA) adversely affects clinical results and neonatal outcomes, or causes congenital deformities.

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted at private IVF clinic from November 2018 to November 2021. Women underwent oocyte retrieval using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol (n = 835) or PPOS protocol (n = 57) were included. Eligible patients were normal ovarian responders (aged <40, AMH ≧1.0 ng/mL) with freeze-all cycle. Embryo developments, clinical results, or neonatal outcomes of singletons derived from transfer of frozen single blastocysts were compared within each group.

Results

Patient characteristics were similar in both groups. The median LH level (mIU/mL) at trigger in the GnRH antagonist group [2.0 (1.2-3.7)] was significantly higher than in the PPOS group [0.9 (0.3-1.7)]. There was no cycle with premature LH surge in the PPOS group. Fertilization and blastocyst formation rates did not differ significantly between groups. Furthermore, clinical outcomes were also similar in the two groups. Congenital abnormality rates did not differ significantly [0.9% (3/329), 0.0% (0/17)].

Conclusions

CMA using ovarian stimulation did not negatively affect clinical results. Our data suggest that PPOS with CMA is an appropriate ovarian stimulation method for normal ovarian responders.