N.U.A.G.E.S: A survey of nebulisation practice in France with regard to ERS guidelines

Trends and Factors Associated with Nebulized Therapy Prescription in Older Adults with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease from 2008 to 2015

Background: Medical management of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) includes nebulized therapy as an option for inhalational drug delivery. A broad variety of short- and long-acting bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids in the nebulized form are available. Despite this, limited information exists on the pattern and predictors of nebulized prescription. We examined the trend and factors associated with prescription of nebulized therapy among Medicare beneficiaries with COPD. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study of 5% Medicare beneficiaries with COPD (n = 66,032) who were enrolled in parts A, B, and D and received nebulized prescription from 2008 to 2015 was conducted. This sample has shown to be representative of the entire fee-for-service Medicare population. The primary outcome was a prescription of nebulized medications. Reliever nebulized medications included short-acting beta agonist (SABA), short-acting muscarinic agents (SAMAs), and a combination of SABA and SAMA, while maintenance nebulized medications included long-acting beta agonists, long-acting muscarinic agents, and corticosteroid solutions as well as combinations of these agents. The secondary outcome was prescription of other inhaler respiratory medications not administered with a nebulizer. Results: Overall, 38.9% patients were prescribed nebulized medication and their prescription significantly declined from 42.4% in 2008 to 35.1% in 2015, majority of which was related to decreased prescriptions of nebulized relievers. Factors associated with the prescription of nebulized medications include female gender (odds ratio [OR] = 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.02-1.09), dual eligibility or low-income subsidy beneficiaries (OR = 1.49; CI = 1.44-1.53), hospitalization for COPD in the previous year (OR = 1.29; CI = 1.25-1.34), home oxygen therapy (OR = 2.29; CI = 2.23-2.36), pulmonary specialist visit (OR = 1.24; CI = 1.20-1.27), and moderate (OR = 1.61; CI = 1.57-1.65) or high (OR = 1.52; CI = 1.46-1.59) severity of COPD. Conclusion: Between 2008 and 2015, prescriptions for nebulized therapy for COPD declined among Medicare beneficiaries, probably related to increase in use of maintenance non-nebulized medications.

A new Strategy to Improve Drug Delivery to the Maxillary Sinuses: The Frequency Sweep Acoustic Airflow

PURPOSE

Enhancement of intranasal sinus deposition involves nebulization of a drug superimposed by an acoustic airflow. We investigated the impact of fixed frequency versus frequency sweep acoustic airflow on the improvement of aerosolized drug penetration into maxillary sinuses.

METHODS

Fixed frequency and frequency sweep acoustic airflow were generated using a nebulizing system of variable frequency. The effect of sweep cycle and intensity variation was studied on the intranasal sinus deposition. We used a nasal replica created from CT scans using 3D printing. Sodium fluoride and gentamicin were chosen as markers.

RESULTS

Studies performed using fixed frequency acoustic airflow showed that each of maxillary sinuses of the nasal replica required specific frequency for the optimal aerosol deposition. Intranasal sinus drug deposition experiments under the effect of the frequency sweep acoustic airflow showed an optimal aerosol deposition into both maxillary sinus of the nasal replica. Studies on the effect of the duration of the sweep cycle showed that the shorter the cycle the better the deposition.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate the benefit of frequency sweep acoustic airflow on drug deposition into maxillary sinuses. However further in vivo studies have to be conducted since delivery rates cannot be obviously determined from a nasal replica.

Effect of three-drug delivery modalities on olfactory function in chronic sinusitis

BACKGROUND

Olfactory dysfunction is deemed to be a significant contributor to poor quality of life in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).

OBJECTIVE

To assess and to compare the effectiveness of three modalities of corticosteroids administration in patients with CRS.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective randomized controlled study

METHODS

Thirty patients with CRS were randomized in three groups depending on the route of corticosteroids administration: 16 days by oral route (Medrol (Pfizer, Belgique), 32 mg/8 days -16 mg/4 days-8 mg/4 days); nasal spray (Rhinocort (AstraZeneca, Belgique), 2 × 2 × 64 µg/nostril); or sonic nebulization (Pulmicort (AstraZeneca, Belgique), 2 × 1 mg/4 mL) (Sonic nebulizer, AOHBOX-NL11SN, DTF, France). Olfactory function was assessed using orthonasal threshold discrimination identification and retronasal psychophysical olfactory tests (RNT) before and after the treatment. Same intranasal modalities were previously tested for in vitro airways scintigraphic deposition.

RESULTS

In vitro differences in drug deposition pattern between both intranasal modalities were demonstrated. Threshold discrimination identification and RNT were similar between three groups at baseline. Threshold discrimination identification improved by 5.5, 5.8, and -1.1 for sonic nebulization, oral, and nasal spray groups, respectively (P = 0.010). This improvement was clinically relevant for oral and nebulized administration. It was similar between oral and nebulized administration but significantly higher than nasal spray administration. Retronasal psychophysical olfactory tests improved similarly for the three groups (P = 0.231) CONCLUSION: Effectiveness of sonic nebulized and oral administration is demonstrated on orthonasal olfactory. The clinical benefit is better than with nasal spray.

Sonic aerosol therapy to target maxillary sinuses

AIM

Intranasal aerosol administration of drugs is widely used by ENT specialists. Although clinical evidence is still lacking, intranasal nebulization appears to be an interesting therapeutic option for local drug delivery, targeting anatomic sites beyond the nasal valve. The sonic nebulizer NL11SN associates a 100Hertz (Hz) sound to the aerosolization to improve deposition in the nasal/paranasal sinuses. The aim of the present study was: to evaluate in vivo the influence of associating a 100Hz sound on sinus ventilation and nasal and pulmonary aerosol deposition in normal volunteers, and; to quantify in vitro aerosol deposition in the maxillary sinuses in a plastinated head model.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Scintigraphic analysis of (81m)Kr gas ventilation and of sonic aerosol ((99m)Tc-DTPA) deposition using the NL11SN was performed in vivo in seven healthy volunteers. In parallel, NL11SN gentamicin nebulization was performed, with or without associated 100Hz sound, in a plastinated human head model; the gross amount of gentamicin delivered to the paranasal sinuses was determined by fluorescence polarization immunoassay.

RESULTS

Associating the 100Hz sound to (81m)Kr gas ensured paranasal sinus ventilation in healthy volunteers. (99m)Tc-DTPA particles nebulized with the NL11SN were deposited predominantly in the nasal cavities (2/3, vs 1/3 in the lungs). In vitro, the use of NL11SN in sonic mode increased gentamicin deposition threefold in the plastinated model sinuses (P<0.002); the resulting antibiotic deposit would be sufficient to induce a local therapeutic effect.

CONCLUSION

The NL11SN nebulizer ensured preferential nasal cavity aerosol deposition and successfully targeted the maxillary sinuses.

[Inhalation devices: characteristics, modeling, regulation and use in routine practice. GAT Aerosolstorming, Paris 2011]

Aerosoltherapy is a first-line treatment for chronic obstructive respiratory diseases such as asthma and COPD. Treatment modalities and devices are varied and the choice of the device must be adapted to and optimized for every patient. Spacers can be used for some categories of patients for whom the use of other devices turns out to be complicated. The improvement of these treatments requires the optimization of the lung deposition of inhaled particles; lung modeling plays an essential role in the understanding of the mechanisms of flow in the airways. Regulations must frame prescription of inhaled treatments to optimize its quality and, thus, the care for these chronic diseases. Many generally-accepted ideas concerning these treatments turn out to be false. Inhaled treatments are constantly evolving, both pharmacologically and technologically.