1
|
Petitt JC, Murayi R, El-Abtah ME, Momin A, Halima A, Potter T, Ahorukomeye P, Jarmula J, Thapliyal M, Murphy ES, Chao ST, Suh JH, Recinos PF, Kshettry VR. Outcomes of adjuvant radiation treatment following subtotal resection of world health organization grade II meningiomas. J Neurooncol 2025; 171:609-617. [PMID: 39538039 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04878-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2024] [Accepted: 11/01/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Existing literature on adjuvant radiation after subtotal resection (STR) of WHO II meningiomas is limited by heterogenous patient cohorts, combining adjuvant and salvage radiation, gross total resection (GTR) and STR, primary radiation treatment vs. re-treatment, or grade II and III meningiomas, all of which have different expected outcomes. Tumor control estimates in a large homogenous patient cohort are needed to accurately counsel patients. METHODS A retrospective review of patients that had immediate post-operative imaging-confirmed residual WHO grade II meningioma followed by either adjuvant intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) between 1996 and 2020 was conducted. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test was used to assess progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS Thirty-nine patients met inclusion criteria (IMRT = 32; SRS = 7). Overall, the 3-, 5-, and 10-year PFS was 81.1%, 61.2%, and 44.6%, respectively. Median follow-up time was 37 months. When comparing IMRT and SRS cohorts, baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between groups, but significantly larger residual tumor volumes were treated with IMRT (22.2 cm3 vs. 6.3 cm3, p = 0.004). PFS was not significantly different between IMRT and SRS at 3 years (81.1% vs. 80.0%) or 5 years (65.5% vs. 40%) (p = 0.19). There was no significant difference in radiation necrosis between groups (IMRT = 3/32 patients vs. SRS = 0/7 patients, p = 0.32). CONCLUSION Our homogenous patient cohort displayed acceptable control rates at 3 years using SRS or IMRT as adjuvant therapy. No significant difference in PFS or radiation necrosis was noted between patients treated with adjuvant IMRT versus SRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan C Petitt
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Roger Murayi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Arbaz Momin
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ahmed Halima
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Tamia Potter
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Peter Ahorukomeye
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jakub Jarmula
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Mihika Thapliyal
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Erin S Murphy
- Rosa Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor & Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Samuel T Chao
- Rosa Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor & Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - John H Suh
- Rosa Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor & Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Pablo F Recinos
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Rosa Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor & Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Varun R Kshettry
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
- Rosa Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor & Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
- Department of Neurosurgery and Rosa Ella Burkhardt Tumor & Neuro-Oncology Center, Skull Base, Pituitary & Cerebrovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, CA5-86, 44195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Glancz LJ, Hannan CJ, Vyziotis A, Potter GM, Siripurapu R, Bhalla RK, Rutherford SA, King AT, Hammerbeck-Ward C, Crellin A, Pan S, Colaco R, Whitfield GA, Pathmanaban ON. Surgical management of skull base chordomas and chondrosarcomas: insights from a national cohort study. BMJ ONCOLOGY 2024; 3:e000386. [PMID: 39886144 PMCID: PMC11347697 DOI: 10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2025]
Abstract
Objective Skull base chordoma and chondrosarcoma are distinct sarcomas of the skull base but share significant therapeutic challenges due to their proximity to critical neurovascular structures, making surgical resection difficult. We sought to establish factors associated with outcome predictors in a national cohort of patients. Methods and analysis Data for all patients referred with a diagnosis of skull base chordoma or chondrosarcoma from April 2017 to December 2022 were obtained. We performed analyses of data pertaining to the first cohort of patients treated in the UK with proton beam therapy (PBT) to determine factors associated with obtaining gross total resection (GTR) and adequate clearance of the brainstem and optic apparatus. Results Of 230 patients with skull base chordoma or chondrosarcoma referred for PBT, 71% were accepted for PBT, with a wide regional variation between referring neurosurgical units (29%-93%). Of the first 75 consecutive patients treated with PBT, the only factor predictive of obtaining GTR was surgical resection at a unit with higher volumes of patients accepted for PBT (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.63, p=0.004). Use of intraoperative MRI (OR 4.84, 95% CI 1.21 to 27.83, p=0.04) and resection at a higher volume unit (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.64, p=0.013) were associated with increased rates of tumour clearance from the brainstem/optic apparatus. Conclusions Treatment at a higher volume centre was a key determinant of the optimal surgical outcome in this cohort. These data support the management of skull base chordomas and chondrosarcomas in higher volume centres where multidisciplinary experience can be accumulated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurence J Glancz
- Department of Neurosurgery, Queens Medical Centre, Manchester, UK
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Cathal John Hannan
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
- The Geoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, Manchester, UK
- Division of Neuroscience, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Alexandros Vyziotis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neuroscience, Salford Royal Hospital, Northern Care Alliance, Manchester, UK
| | - Gillian M Potter
- Department of Radiology, Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust, Ashton-under-Lyne, UK
| | - Rekha Siripurapu
- Department of Neuroradiology, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Raj K Bhalla
- Department of Otolaryngology, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| | - Scott A Rutherford
- Department of Neurosurgery, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neuroscience, Salford Royal Hospital, Northern Care Alliance, Manchester, UK
| | - Andrew Thomas King
- The Geoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, Manchester, UK
- Department of Neurosurgery, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neuroscience, Salford Royal Hospital, Northern Care Alliance, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Adrian Crellin
- Highly Specialised Commissioning, NHS England, Redditch, UK
| | - Shermaine Pan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Rovel Colaco
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Gillian A Whitfield
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Omar N Pathmanaban
- The Geoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, Manchester, UK
- Division of Neuroscience, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Department of Neurosurgery, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neuroscience, Salford Royal Hospital, Northern Care Alliance, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sallabanda M, Vera JA, Pérez JM, Matute R, Montero M, de Pablo A, Cerrón F, Valero M, Castro J, Mazal A, Miralbell R. Five-Fraction Proton Therapy for the Treatment of Skull Base Chordomas and Chondrosarcomas: Early Results of a Prospective Series and Description of a Clinical Trial. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5579. [PMID: 38067283 PMCID: PMC10705113 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15235579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2024] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Our purpose is to describe the design of a phase II clinical trial on 5-fraction proton therapy for chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the skull base and to present early results in terms of local control and clinical tolerance of the first prospective series. (2) Methods: A dose of 37.5 GyRBE in five fractions was proposed for chordomas and 35 GyRBE in five fractions for chondrosarcomas. The established inclusion criteria are age ≥ 18 years, Karnofsky Performance Status ≥ 70%, clinical target volume up to 50 cc, and compliance with dose restrictions to the critical organs. Pencil beam scanning was used for treatment planning, employing four to six beams. (3) Results: A total of 11 patients (6 chordomas and 5 chondrosarcomas) were included. The median follow-up was 12 months (9-15 months) with 100% local control. Acute grade I-II headache (64%), grade I asthenia and alopecia (45%), grade I nausea (27%), and grade I dysphagia (18%) were described. Late toxicity was present in two patients with grade 3 temporal lobe necrosis. (4) Conclusions: Hypofractionated proton therapy is showing encouraging preliminary results. However, to fully assess the efficacy of this therapeutic approach, future trials with adequate sample sizes and extended follow-ups are necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morena Sallabanda
- Centro de Protonterapia Quironsalud, Pozuelo de Alarcón, 28223 Madrid, Spain; (J.A.V.); (J.M.P.); (A.M.); (R.M.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lemaeva A, Gulidov I. Radiation Therapy for Chordomas and Chondrosarcomas of the Skull Base: Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Treatment Methods (Review). Sovrem Tekhnologii Med 2023; 15:44-52. [PMID: 39967912 PMCID: PMC11832067 DOI: 10.17691/stm2023.15.5.05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/20/2025] Open
Abstract
Chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the skull base are rare tumors. They are located in close proximity to critical structures, which poses a serious problem in the treatment of these tumors. Despite advances in surgery, radical resection is often not possible. Radiation therapy for chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the skull base is able to improve overall survival and local control. The aim of this review is to analyze the literature data and evaluate the efficacy of radiation therapy techniques for chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the skull base. The most promising methods of radiation therapy for chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the skull base have been shown to be pencil-beam scanning proton therapy with intensity modulation and carbon ion therapy. These techniques have demonstrated high local control and overall survival with a low incidence of severe radiation-induced toxicity, which confirms their clinical benefits. It has also been found that stereotactic radiosurgery can be effectively used for small tumors (less than 7 cm3).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A.A. Lemaeva
- Resident; A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Centre — Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 4 Koroleva St., Obninsk, 249036, Russia
| | - I.A. Gulidov
- MD, DSc, Professor, Head of the Radiotherapy Department; A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Centre — Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 4 Koroleva St., Obninsk, 249036, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Budrukkar A, Guinot JL, Tagliaferri L, Bussu F, García-Consuegra A, Kovacs G. Function Preservation in Head and Neck Cancers. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023:S0936-6555(23)00044-4. [PMID: 36849321 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.01.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Revised: 01/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The treatment of head and neck cancers can have a significant impact on function and appearance, which results in impairment of quality of life. Various long-term sequelae of treatment include speech and swallowing difficulty, oral incompetence, trismus, xerostomia, dental caries and osteoradionecrosis. Management has evolved from single modality treatment of either surgery or radiation to multimodality treatment to attain acceptable functional outcomes. Brachytherapy, also known as interventional radiotherapy, with its ability to deliver high doses centrally to the target, has been shown to improve local control rates. Due to the rapid fall-off of the dose of brachytherapy there is better organ at risk sparing as compared with that of external beam radiotherapy. In the head and neck region, brachytherapy has been practiced in various sites, including the oral cavity, oropharynx, nasopharynx, nasal vestibule and paranasal sinuses. Additionally, brachytherapy has also been considered for reirradiation as a salvage. Brachytherapy can also be considered as a perioperative technique together with surgery. Close multidisciplinary cooperation is required for a successful brachytherapy programme. In oral cavity cancers, depending on the location of the tumour, brachytherapy has been shown to preserve oral competence, maintain tongue mobility, maintain speech, swallowing and the hard palate. Brachytherapy in oropharyngeal cancers has been shown to reduce xerostomia and also reduce dysphagia and aspiration post-radiation therapy. For the nasopharynx, paranasal sinus and nasal vestibule, brachytherapy preserves the respiratory function of the mucosa. Despite such an incomparable impact on function and organ preservation, brachytherapy is an underutilised technique for head and neck cancers. There is a strong need to improve brachytherapy utilisation in head and neck cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Budrukkar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, India.
| | - J L Guinot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Foundation Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia (I.V.O.), Valencia, Spain
| | - L Tagliaferri
- U.O.C. Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - F Bussu
- Otorinolaringology Division, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, Sassari, Italy; Department of Medicine, Surgery and Pharmacy, Università degli studi di Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | | | - G Kovacs
- Gemelli-INTERACTS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Thawani R, Kim MS, Arastu A, Feng Z, West MT, Taflin NF, Thein KZ, Li R, Geltzeiler M, Lee N, Fuller CD, Grandis JR, Floudas CS, Heinrich MC, Hanna E, Chandra RA. The contemporary management of cancers of the sinonasal tract in adults. CA Cancer J Clin 2023; 73:72-112. [PMID: 35916666 PMCID: PMC9840681 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2021] [Revised: 05/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Sinonasal malignancies make up <5% of all head and neck neoplasms, with an incidence of 0.5-1.0 per 100,000. The outcome of these rare malignancies has been poor, whereas significant progress has been made in the management of other cancers. The objective of the current review was to describe the incidence, causes, presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and recent developments of malignancies of the sinonasal tract. The diagnoses covered in this review included sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma, sinonasal adenocarcinoma, sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma, and esthesioneuroblastoma, which are exclusive to the sinonasal tract. In addition, the authors covered malignances that are likely to be encountered in the sinonasal tract-primary mucosal melanoma, NUT (nuclear protein of the testis) carcinoma, and extranodal natural killer cell/T-cell lymphoma. For the purpose of keeping this review as concise and focused as possible, sarcomas and malignancies that can be classified as salivary gland neoplasms were excluded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajat Thawani
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University
| | - Myung Sun Kim
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University
| | - Asad Arastu
- Department of Internal Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University
| | - Zizhen Feng
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University
| | - Malinda T. West
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University
| | | | - Kyaw Zin Thein
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University
| | - Ryan Li
- Department of Otolaryngology, Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University
| | - Mathew Geltzeiler
- Department of Otolaryngology, Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University
| | - Nancy Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | | | - Jennifer R. Grandis
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Francisco
| | | | - Michael C. Heinrich
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University
| | - Ehab Hanna
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Ravi A. Chandra
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gordon K, Gulidov I, Koryakin S, Smyk D, Makeenkova T, Gogolin D, Lepilina O, Golovanova O, Semenov A, Dujenko S, Medvedeva K, Mardynsky Y. Proton therapy with a fixed beamline for skull-base chordomas and chondrosarcomas: outcomes and toxicity. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:238. [PMID: 34930352 PMCID: PMC8686536 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01961-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim This study presents an analysis (efficacy and toxicity) of outcomes in patients with skull-base chordomas or chondrosarcomas treated with a fixed horizontal pencil proton beam. Background Chordomas (CAs) and chondrosarcomas (CSAs) are rare tumours that are usually located near the base of the skull and very close to the brain's most critical structures. Proton therapy (PT) is often considered the best radiation treatment for these diseases, but it is still a limited resource. Active scanning PT delivered via a fixed pencil beamline might be a promising option. Methods This is a single-centre experience describing the results of proton therapy for 31 patients with CA (n = 23) or CSA (n = 8) located near the base of the skull. Proton therapy was utilized by a fixed pencil beamline with a chair to position the patient between May 2016 and November 2020. Ten patients underwent resection (32.2%), 15 patients (48.4%) underwent R2 resection, and 6 patients had unresectable tumours (19.4%). In 4 cases, the tumours had been previously irradiated. The median PT dose was 70 GyRBE (relative biological efficacy, 1.1) [range, 60 to 74] with 2.0 GyRBE per fraction. The mean GTV volume was 25.6 cm3 [range, 4.2–115.6]. Patient demographics, pathology, treatment parameters, and toxicity were collected and analysed. Radiation-induced reactions were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v 4.0. Results The median follow-up time was 21 months [range, 4 to 52]. The median overall survival (OS) was 40 months. The 1- and 2-year OS was 100%, and the 3-year OS was 66.3%. Four patients died due to non-cancer-related reasons, 1 patient died due to tumour progression, and 1 patient died due to treatment-related injuries. The 1-year local control (LC) rate was 100%, the 2-year LC rate was 93.7%, and the 3-year LC rate was 85.3%. Two patients with CSA exhibited progression in the neck lymph nodes and lungs. All patients tolerated PT well without any treatment interruptions. We observed 2 cases of ≥ grade 3 toxicity, with 1 case of grade 3 myelitis and 1 case of grade 5 brainstem injury. Conclusion Treatment with a fixed proton beam shows promising disease control and an acceptable toxicity rate, even the difficult-to-treat subpopulation of patients with skull-base chordomas or chondrosarcomas requiring dose escalation.
Collapse
|
8
|
Teng C, Yang Q, Xiong Z, Ye N, Li X. Multivariate Analysis and Validation of the Prognostic Factors for Skull Base Chordoma. Front Surg 2021; 8:764329. [PMID: 34888345 PMCID: PMC8649658 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.764329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Skull base chordoma is a rare tumor with low-grade malignancy and a high recurrence rate, the factors affecting the prognosis of patients need to be further studied. For that, we investigated prognostic factors of skull base chordoma through the database of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program, and validated in an independent data set from the Xiangya Hospital. Methods: Six hundred and forty-three patients diagnosed with skull base chordoma were obtained from the SEER database (606 patients) and the Xiangya Hospital (37 patients). Categorical variables were selected by Chi-square test with a statistical difference. Survival curves were constructed by Kaplan–Meier analysis and compared by log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to explore the prognostic factors. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was undertaken to reduce the substantial bias between gross total resection (GTR) and subtotal resection (STR) groups. Furthermore, clinical data of 37 patients from the Xiangya Hospital were used as validation cohorts to check the survival impacts of the extent of resection and adjuvant radiotherapy on prognosis. Results: We found that age at diagnosis, primary site, disease stage, surgical treatment, and tumor size was significantly associated with the prognosis of skull base chordoma. PSM analysis revealed that there was no significant difference in the OS between GTR and STR (p = 0.157). Independent data set from the Xiangya Hospital proved no statistical difference in OS between GTR and STR groups (p = 0.16), but the GTR group was superior to the STR group for progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.048). Postoperative radiotherapy does not improve OS (p = 0.28), but it can prolong PFS (p = 0.0037). Nomograms predicting 5- and 10-year OS and DSS were constructed based on statistically significant factors identified by multivariate Cox analysis. Age, primary site, tumor size, surgical treatment, and disease stage were included as prognostic predictors in the nomograms with good performance. Conclusions: We identified age, tumor size, surgery, primary site, and tumor stage as main factors affecting the prognosis of the skull base chordoma. Resection of the tumor as much as possible while ensuring safety, combined with postoperative radiotherapy may be the optimum treatment for skull base chordoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chubei Teng
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Hunan International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Brain Tumor Research, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, University of South China, Hengyang, China
| | - Qi Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Hunan International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Brain Tumor Research, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Zujian Xiong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Hunan International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Brain Tumor Research, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Ningrong Ye
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Hunan International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Brain Tumor Research, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xuejun Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Hunan International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Brain Tumor Research, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Therapeutic Efficacy of Variable Biological Effectiveness of Proton Therapy in U-CH2 and MUG-Chor1 Human Chordoma Cell Death. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13236115. [PMID: 34885223 PMCID: PMC8656796 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13236115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Revised: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Chordoma is a rare, slow-growing cancer of the spinal cord. Photon radiation therapy and surgery are the standard of care for chordoma. Proton radiation therapy has become an increasingly common treatment in comparison to photon radiation therapy due to the ability to reduce off-target radiation dose. However, there is still an increased risk of toxicity to the surrounding critical structures that lead to poor treatment outcomes. Moreover, the biologic effectiveness of protons to sterilize chordoma cells remains uncertain and likely varies according to the proton energy spectrum throughout the proton field. We aim to investigate the tumoricidal properties of proton radiation therapy at the middle and end of the proton radiation field and elucidate variations in the relative biological effectiveness for chordoma cells. Our study helps quantify the therapeutic value of treating chordoma near the end of the proton field, where linear energy transfer is relatively high. Abstract Background: Chordoma is a cancer of spinal cord, skull base, and sacral area. Currently, the standard of care to treat chordoma is resection followed by radiation therapy. Since, chordoma is present in the spinal cord and these are very sensitive structures and often complete removal by surgery is not possible. As a result, chordoma has a high chance of recurrence and developing resistance to radiation therapy. In addition, treatment of chordoma by conventional radiation therapy can also damage normal tissues surrounding chordoma. Thus, current therapeutic options to treat chordoma are insufficient and novel therapies are desperately needed to treat locally advanced and metastatic chordoma. (2) Methods: In the present investigation, human chordoma cell lines of sacral origin MUG-Chor1 and U-CH2 were cultured and irradiated with Proton Beam Radiation using the clinical superconducting cyclotron and pencil-beam (active) scanning at Middle and End of the Spread-Out Bragg Peak (SOBP). Proton radiation was given at the following doses: Mug-Chor1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, and 8 Gy and U-CH2 at 0, 4, 8, 12, and 16 Gy. These doses were selected based on a pilot study in our lab and attempted to produce approximate survival fractions in the range of 1, 0.9, 0.5, 0.1, and 0.01, respectively, chosen for linear quadratic model fitting of the dose response. (3) Results: In this study, we investigated relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of proton radiation at the end of Spread Out Bragg Peak assuming that the reference radiation is a proton radiation in the middle of the SOBP. We observed differences in the survival of both Human chordoma cell lines, U-CH2 and MUG-Chor1. The data showed that there was a significantly higher cell death at the end of the Bragg peak as compared to middle of the Bragg peak. Based on the linear quadratic (LQ) fit for cell survival we calculated the RBE between M-SOBP and E-SOBP at 95% CI level and it was observed that RBE was higher than 1 at E-SOBP and caused significantly higher cell killing. Proton field at E-SOBP caused complex DNA damage in comparison to M-EOBP and the genes such as DNA topoisomerase 1, GTSE1, RAD51B were downregulated in E-SOBP treated cells. Thus, we conclude that there seems to be substantial variation in RBE (1.3–1.7) at the E-SOBP compared with the M-SOBP.
Collapse
|
10
|
Rimmer RA, Mace JC, Andersen PE, Cetas JS, Ciporen JN, Dogan A, Smith TL, Geltzeiler M. Determinants of survival in sinonasal and skull base chondrosarcoma: An analysis of the National Cancer Database. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2021; 12:699-713. [PMID: 34704402 DOI: 10.1002/alr.22909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Revised: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 09/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chondrosarcomas are rare, malignant chondroid tumors that can occur in the sinonasal and skull base regions. Surgery is a mainstay of treatment, but complete resection can be challenging because of the close proximity of critical neurovascular structures. Because of their rarity and relatively indolent nature, optimal treatment regimens are not established. Our objective was to assess determinants of survival for sinonasal and skull base chondrosarcomas utilizing the National Cancer Database (NCDB). METHODS The NCDB (2004-2017) was queried for cases of sinonasal and skull base chondrosarcoma. Multivariate hazard regression modeling was used to identify significant predictors of 60-month and 120-month overall survival (OS). RESULTS Seven hundred thirty-six cases met inclusion criteria. OS for all treatment types was 84.7% [SE±0.02] at 60 months and 75.6% [SE±0.02] at 120 months. Surgery with or without adjuvant treatment was found to associate with highest OS at 60 and 120 months. For patients receiving adjuvant radiation during treatment, proton therapy had significantly better OS at 60 months (95.4% [SE±0.03] vs 82.3% [SE±0.03], -2 = 5.27; p = 0.02) and 120 months (85.1% [SE±0.08] vs 72.8% [SE±0.05], -2 = 4.11; p = 0.04) compared with conventional external beam. After adjustment for primary site, multivariate Cox regression modeling (n = 561) identified cofactors significantly associated with variation in mortality risk at 60 and 120 months, including age, Charlson-Deyo total score ≥ 3, insurance provision status, and tumor grade. CONCLUSIONS Sinonasal and skull base chondrosarcoma are primarily treated with surgery with favorable OS. Adjuvant treatment may be required and proton radiation was associated with improved 60-month and 120-month survival compared with conventional radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan A Rimmer
- Division of Rhinology, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, OR
| | - Jess C Mace
- Division of Rhinology, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, OR
| | - Peter E Andersen
- Division of Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, OR
| | - Justin S Cetas
- Division of Skull Base and Cerebrovascular, Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, OR
| | - Jeremy N Ciporen
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University-Tuality Healthcare, Hillsboro, OR
| | - Aclan Dogan
- Division of Skull Base and Cerebrovascular, Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, OR
| | - Timothy L Smith
- Division of Rhinology, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, OR
| | - Mathew Geltzeiler
- Division of Rhinology, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, OR
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Köthe A, Feuvret L, Weber DC, Safai S, Lomax AJ, Fattori G. Assessment of Radiation-Induced Optic Neuropathy in a Multi-Institutional Cohort of Chordoma and Chondrosarcoma Patients Treated with Proton Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13215327. [PMID: 34771490 PMCID: PMC8582447 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13215327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Revised: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Proton therapy is an effective therapeutic option for the treatment of skull-base tumors that require high radiation doses to be controlled. On rare occasions, patients suffer from radiation-induced optic neuropathy (RION) to the detriment of their post-treatment quality-of-life. We have collected multi-institutional data of 289 skull-base patients having received high doses to the optic apparatus from proton therapy or proton–photon mixed treatments and have observed a RION incidence rate (all grades) of 4.2% (12). We have furthermore confirmed older age and hypertension as risk factors for the onset of this side effect, with tumor involvement or its proximity to the optic apparatus and repeated surgical procedures showing moderate association. Our findings were consolidated into a NTCP model that can support pre-treatment patient segmentation into risk groups and the planning of necessary treatment countermeasures. However, further data and validation are necessary to confirm validity of the model. Abstract Radiation-induced optic neuropathy (RION) is a rare side effect following radiation therapy involving the optic structures whose onset is, due to the low amount of available data, challenging to predict. We have analyzed a multi-institutional cohort including 289 skull-base cancer patients treated with proton therapy who all received >45 GyRBE to the optic apparatus. An overall incidence rate of 4.2% (12) was observed, with chordoma patients being at higher risk (5.8%) than chondrosarcoma patients (3.2%). Older age and arterial hypertension, tumor involvement, and repeated surgeries (>3) were found to be associated with RION. Based on bootstrapping and cross-validation, a NTCP model based on age and hypertension was determined to be the most robust, showing good classification ability (AUC-ROC 0.77) and calibration on our dataset. We suggest the application of this model with a threshold of 6% to segment patients into low and high-risk groups before treatment planning. However, further data and external validation are warranted before clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Köthe
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland; (D.C.W.); (S.S.); (A.J.L.); (G.F.)
- Department of Physics, ETH Zürich, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland
- Correspondence:
| | - Loïc Feuvret
- Center for Proton Therapy, Institut Curie, 91400 Orsay, France;
- Department of Radiation Oncology, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Salpêtrière Charles Foix, Sorbonne Université, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Damien Charles Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland; (D.C.W.); (S.S.); (A.J.L.); (G.F.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sairos Safai
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland; (D.C.W.); (S.S.); (A.J.L.); (G.F.)
| | - Antony John Lomax
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland; (D.C.W.); (S.S.); (A.J.L.); (G.F.)
- Department of Physics, ETH Zürich, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Giovanni Fattori
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland; (D.C.W.); (S.S.); (A.J.L.); (G.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gordon KB, Smyk DI, Gulidov IA. Proton Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer Treatment: State of the Problem and Development Prospects (Review). Sovrem Tekhnologii Med 2021; 13:70-80. [PMID: 34603766 PMCID: PMC8482826 DOI: 10.17691/stm2021.13.4.08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton therapy (PT) due to dosimetric characteristics (Bragg peak formation, sharp dose slowdown) is currently one of the most high-tech techniques of radiation therapy exceeding the standards of photon methods. In recent decades, PT has traditionally been used, primarily, for head and neck cancers (HNC) including skull base tumors. Regardless of the fact that recently PT application area has significantly expanded, HNC still remain a leading indication for proton radiation since PT’s physic-dosimetric and radiobiological advantages enable to achieve the best treatment results in these tumors. The present review is devoted to PT usage in HNC treatment in the world and Russian medicine, the prospects for further technique development, the assessment of PT’s radiobiological features, a physical and dosimetric comparison of protons photons distribution. The paper shows PT’s capabilities in the treatment of skull base tumors, HNC (nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses, nasopharynx, oropharynx, and laryngopharynx, etc.), eye tumors, sialomas. The authors analyze the studies on repeated radiation and provide recent experimental data on favorable profile of proton radiation compared to the conventional radiation therapy. The review enables to conclude that currently PT is a dynamic radiation technique opening up new opportunities for improving therapy of oncology patients, especially those with HNC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K B Gordon
- Senior Researcher, Proton Therapy Department; A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Centre - Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 4 Koroleva St., Kaluga Region, Obninsk, 249036, Russia
| | - D I Smyk
- Junior Researcher, Proton Therapy Department; A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Centre - Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 4 Koroleva St., Kaluga Region, Obninsk, 249036, Russia
| | - I A Gulidov
- Professor, Head of the Proton Therapy Department; A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Centre - Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 4 Koroleva St., Kaluga Region, Obninsk, 249036, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sallabanda M, Garcia R, Lorenzana L, Santaolalla I, Abarca J, Sallabanda K. Treatment of Chordomas and Chondrosarcomas With CyberKnife Robotic Hypofractionated Radiosurgery: A Single Institution Experience. Cureus 2021; 13:e17012. [PMID: 34405079 PMCID: PMC8352833 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.17012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of CyberKnife® (Accuray, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) hypofractionated radiosurgery (HfRS) in the treatment of chordomas and chondrosarcomas. Methods A total of 24 patients retrospectively identified with chordomas (19 patients) or chondrosarcomas (five patients) were treated between 2012 and 2019 with HfRS as monotherapy or an adjuvant, rescue, or combination therapy. Tumors were located in the skull base (75%) and vertebral spine (25%). Of these, 19 patients underwent previous partial resection and four patients received previous conventional external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) (60-74 Gy). Exclusive or rescue HfRS (20 patients) was administered in five fractions with a median dose of 37.5 Gy (30-40 Gy). Combined tomotherapy-EBRT treatment (median dose: 54 Gy) and HfRS (16.5-30 Gy in 3-12 fractions) were performed in four patients with bulky chordomas. Results The median follow-up from HfRS was 28 months. During clinical follow-up, no deaths were registered with overall survival (OS) of 100% and the actuarial local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was 93% at one year, 85% at three years, and 68% at five years. Acute toxicity related to HfRS was present in a single patient. Conclusions It is seen that HfRS is effective and safe for chordomas and chondrosarcomas, with rates of LRFS comparable to other radiation modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rafael Garcia
- Radiation Oncology, Genesis Care Cyberknife Center, Madrid, ESP
| | - Luis Lorenzana
- Neurosurgery, Genesis Care Cyberknife Center, Madrid, ESP
| | | | - Javier Abarca
- Neurological Surgery, Hospital General de Alicante, Madrid, ESP
| | - Kita Sallabanda
- Radiosurgery/Neurosurgery, Hospital Clinico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, ESP
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hug EB, Pelak M, Frank SJ, Fossati P. A Review of Particle Therapy for Skull Base Tumors: Modern Considerations and Future Directions. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:168-178. [PMID: 34285944 PMCID: PMC8270106 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Skull base tumors constitute one of the established indications for particle therapy, specifically proton therapy. However, a number of prognostic factors, practical clinical management issues, and the emerging role of carbon ion therapy remain subjects of active clinical investigation. This review summarizes these topics, assesses the present status, and reflects on future research directions focusing on the management of chordomas, one of the most aggressive skull base tumors. In addition, the role of particle therapy for benign tumors of the skull base, including pituitary adenoma and acoustic neuroma, is reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugen B Hug
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Maciej Pelak
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Steven J Frank
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Division of Radiation Oncology, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Piero Fossati
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma, a Narrative Reappraisal of the Current Evidence. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13112835. [PMID: 34200193 PMCID: PMC8201377 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13112835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Revised: 05/30/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Sinonasal squamous cell carcinomas are a group of diverse tumors affecting the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. As a direct consequence of their rarity and heterogeneity, diagnosis is challenging, and treatment does not follow universally accepted protocols. Though surgery represents the mainstay of treatment, neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies have pivotal roles in improving outcomes of patients treated with curative intent. Indications to endoscopic surgery have been expanding over the last three decades, but a considerable number of patients affected by sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma still need open surgical procedures. Management of the neck in patients affected by sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma is controversial. Curative-intended treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic tumors, alongside palliation of uncurable cases, represent poorly explored aspects of this disease. Abstract Sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma is a rare tumor affecting the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Several aspects of this disease, ranging from epidemiology to biology, pathology, diagnosis, staging, treatment, and post-treatment surveillance are controversial, and consensus on how to manage this sinonasal cancer is lacking. A narrative literature review was performed to summarize the current evidence and provide the reader with available data supporting the decision-making process in patients affected by sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma, alongside the authors’ personal opinion on the unsolved issues of this tumor. The review has highlighted several advances in molecular definition of epithelial cancers of the sinonasal tract. Surgery represents the pivot of treatment and is performed through an endoscopic transnasal approach whenever feasible. Open surgery is required for a large proportion of cases. Reconstruction of the defect follows principles of skull base and cranio-maxillo-facial reconstruction. Chemotherapy is given as neoadjuvant treatment or concomitantly to radiotherapy. Photon-based radiation therapy has a crucial role in the adjuvant setting. Particle therapy is providing promising results. Management of the neck should be planned based on the presence of clinically appreciable metastases, primary tumor extension, and need for recipient vessels. Biotherapy and immunotherapy are still underexplored therapeutical modalities.
Collapse
|
16
|
Nicholas O, Prosser S, Mortensen HR, Radhakrishna G, Hawkins MA, Gwynne SH. The Promise of Proton Beam Therapy for Oesophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review of Dosimetric and Clinical Outcomes. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:e339-e358. [PMID: 33931290 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Revised: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Due to its physical advantages over photon radiotherapy, proton beam therapy (PBT) has the potential to improve outcomes from oesophageal cancer. However, for many tumour sites, high-quality evidence supporting PBT use is limited. We carried out a systematic review of published literature of PBT in oesophageal cancer to ascertain potential benefits of this technology and to gauge the current state-of-the-art. We considered if further evaluation of this technology in oesophageal cancer is desirable. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic literature search of Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science using structured search terms was carried out. Inclusion criteria included non-metastatic cancer, full articles and English language studies only. Articles deliberating technical aspects of PBT planning or delivery were excluded to maintain a clinical focus. Studies were divided into two sections: dosimetric and clinical studies; qualitatively synthesised. RESULTS In total, 467 records were screened, with 32 included for final qualitative synthesis. This included two prospective studies with the rest based on retrospective data. There was heterogeneity in treatment protocols, including treatment intent (neoadjuvant or definitive), dose, fractionation and chemotherapy used. Compared with photon radiotherapy, PBT seemed to reduce dose to organs at risk, especially lung and heart, although not for all reported parameters. Toxicity outcomes, including postoperative complications, were reduced compared with photon radiotherapy. Survival outcomes were reported to be at least comparable with photon radiotherapy. CONCLUSION There is a paucity of high-quality evidence supporting PBT use in oesophageal cancer. Wide variation in intent and treatment protocols means that the role and 'gold-standard' treatment protocol are yet to be defined. Current literature suggests significant benefit in terms of toxicity reduction, especially in the postoperative period, with comparable survival outcomes. PBT in oesophageal cancer holds significant promise for improving patient outcomes but requires robust systematic evaluation in prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Nicholas
- South West Wales Cancer Centre, Swansea, UK; Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK.
| | - S Prosser
- South West Wales Cancer Centre, Swansea, UK
| | - H R Mortensen
- The Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - M A Hawkins
- University College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - S H Gwynne
- South West Wales Cancer Centre, Swansea, UK; Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hashemi Z, Tatari M, Naik H. Simulation of dose distribution and secondary particle production in proton therapy of brain tumor. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2020; 25:927-933. [PMID: 33088228 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2020] [Revised: 08/01/2020] [Accepted: 08/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim The aim of this study is simulation of the proton depth-dose distribution and dose evaluation of secondary particles in proton therapy of brain tumor using the GEANT4 and FLUKA Monte Carlo codes. Background Proton therapy is a treatment method for variety of tumors such as brain tumor. The most important feature of high energy proton beams is the energy deposition as a Bragg curve and the possibility of creating the spread out Bragg peak (SOBP) for full coverage of the tumor. Materials and methods A spherical tumor with the radius of 1 cm in the brain is considered. A SNYDER head phantom has been irradiated with 30-130 MeV proton beam energy. A PMMA modulator wheel is used for covering the tumor. The simulations are performed using the GEANT4 and FLUKA codes. Results Using a modulator wheel, the Spread Out Bragg Peak longitudinally and laterally covers the tumor. Flux and absorbed dose of secondary particles produced by nuclear interactions of protons with elements in the head are considerably small compared to protons. Conclusions Using 76.85 MeV proton beam and a modulator wheel, the tumor can be treated accurately in the 3-D, so that the distribution of proton dose in the surrounding tissues is very low. The results show that more than 99% of the total dose of secondary particles and protons is absorbed in the tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zahra Hashemi
- Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Yazd University, Yazd 89195-741, Iran
| | - Mansoureh Tatari
- Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Yazd University, Yazd 89195-741, Iran
| | - Haladhara Naik
- Radiochemistry Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400085, India
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
VanKoevering KK, Sabetsarvestani K, Sullivan SE, Barkan A, Mierzwa M, McKean EL. Pituitary Dysfunction after Radiation for Anterior Skull Base Malignancies: Incidence and Screening. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2020; 81:75-81. [PMID: 32021753 DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1679893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2018] [Accepted: 12/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Management of anterior cranial base malignancies requires multidisciplinary care. Radiation therapy remains a mainstay of definitive or adjuvant treatment. Apart from primary hypothyroidism, the effects of radiation on the hypothalamic-pituitary axis after high-dose treatment of head and neck malignancies remain poorly described. We describe a comprehensive screening protocol for surveillance and characterize the incidence of pituitary dysfunction after radiation for anterior cranial base malignancies. Methods A review of patients prospectively enrolled in a skull base registry at an academic center was performed. Included patients had a history of anterior skull base malignancy and external beam radiation to the primary site, with comprehensive post-treatment pituitary serologies and at least 1 year of post-radiation follow-up. Routine hormonal screening was initiated during the study period for all patients with anterior skull base irradiation. Results Eighty-one patients met inclusion. Fifty-eight patients (71%) demonstrated some laboratory abnormality. Thirty patients (37%) demonstrated evidence of hypopituitarism. Twenty-four (29%) demonstrated central hypogonadism, and 16% of patients showed central hypothyroidism. Ten patients (12%) displayed central adrenal insufficiency with six patients demonstrating panhypopituitarism. Primary tumor location and maximum dose of radiation to the gland appeared to correlate with incidence of hypopituitarism. Conclusion Radiation for malignancies of the anterior skull base resulted in a 37% incidence of hypopituitarism in our study. Given the potential morbidity of hypopituitarism, we recommend annual post-treatment screening in these patients. We describe a comprehensive set of serologies that can be utilized, and recommend updating clinical guidelines to reflect the necessity of this screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle K VanKoevering
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
| | | | - Stephen E Sullivan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
| | - Ariel Barkan
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
| | - Michelle Mierzwa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
| | - Erin L McKean
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States.,Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
MR imaging as a precise technique to evaluate skull-base tumor volume: Comparison of CT, MR imaging and FDG PET from murine and clinical data. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2020; 48:105-110. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2019] [Revised: 11/06/2019] [Accepted: 12/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
|
20
|
Gutierrez A, Rompokos V, Li K, Gillies C, D’Souza D, Solda F, Fersht N, Chang YC, Royle G, Amos RA, Underwood T. The impact of proton LET/RBE modeling and robustness analysis on base-of-skull and pediatric craniopharyngioma proton plans relative to VMAT. Acta Oncol 2019; 58:1765-1774. [PMID: 31429359 PMCID: PMC6882303 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2019.1653496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2018] [Accepted: 08/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: Pediatric craniopharyngioma, adult base-of-skull sarcoma and chordoma cases are all regarded as priority candidates for proton therapy. In this study, a dosimetric comparison between volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) was first performed. We then investigated the impact of physical and biological uncertainties. We assessed whether IMPT plans remained dosimetrically superior when such uncertainty estimates were considered, especially with regards to sparing organs at risk (OARs).Methodology: We studied 10 cases: four chondrosarcoma, two chordoma and four pediatric craniopharyngioma. VMAT and IMPT plans were created according to modality-specific protocols. For IMPT, we considered (i) variable RBE modeling using the McNamara model for different values of (α/β)x, and (ii) robustness analysis with ±3 mm set-up and 3.5% range uncertainties.Results: When comparing the VMAT and IMPT plans, the dosimetric advantages of IMPT were clear: IMPT led to reduced integral dose and, typically, improved CTV coverage given our OAR constraints. When physical robustness analysis was performed for IMPT, some uncertainty scenarios worsened the CTV coverage but not usually beyond that achieved by VMAT. Certain scenarios caused OAR constraints to be exceeded, particularly for the brainstem and optical chiasm. However, variable RBE modeling predicted even more substantial hotspots, especially for low values of (α/β)x. Variable RBE modeling often prompted dose constraints to be exceeded for critical structures.Conclusion: For base-of-skull and pediatric craniopharyngioma cases, both physical and biological robustness analyses should be considered for IMPT: these analyses can substantially affect the sparing of OARs and comparisons against VMAT. All proton RBE modeling is subject to high levels of uncertainty, but the clinical community should remain cognizant possible RBE effects. Careful clinical and imaging follow-up, plus further research on end-of-range RBE mitigation strategies such as LET optimization, should be prioritized for these cohorts of proton patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Gutierrez
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - V. Rompokos
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - K. Li
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - C. Gillies
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - D. D’Souza
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - F. Solda
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - N. Fersht
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Y.-C. Chang
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - G. Royle
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - R. A. Amos
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - T. Underwood
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Guan X, Gao J, Hu J, Hu W, Yang J, Qiu X, Hu C, Kong L, Lu JJ. The preliminary results of proton and carbon ion therapy for chordoma and chondrosarcoma of the skull base and cervical spine. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:206. [PMID: 31752953 PMCID: PMC6869181 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1407-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2019] [Accepted: 10/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the short-term outcomes in terms of tumor control and toxicity of patients with skull base or cervical spine chordoma and chondrosarcoma treated with intensity-modulated proton or carbon-ion radiation therapy. Methods Between 6/2014 and 7/2018, a total of 91 patients were treated in our Center. The median age was 38 (range, 4–70) years. Forty-six (50.5%) patients were treated definitively for their conditions as initial diagnosis, 45 (49.5%) patients had recurrent tumors including 14 had prior radiotherapy. The median gross tumor volume was 37.0 (range, 1.6–231.7) cc. Eight patients received proton therapy alone, 28 patients received combined proton and carbon ion therapy, 55 patients received carbon-ion therapy alone. Results With a median follow-up time of 28 (range, 8–59) months, the 2-year local control (LC), progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates was 86.2, 76.8, and 87.2%, respectively. Those rates for patients received definitive proton or carbon-ion therapy were 86.7, 82.8, and 93.8%, respectively. On multivariate analyses, tumor volume of > 60 cc was the only significant factor for predicting PFS (p = 0.045), while re-irradiation (p = 0.012) and tumor volume (> vs < 60 cc) (p = 0.005) were significant prognosticators for OS. Grade 1–2 late toxicities were observed in 11 patients, and one patient developed Grade 3 acute mucositis. Conclusions Larger tumor volume and re-irradiation were related to inferior survival for this group of patients. Further follow-up is needed for long-term efficacy and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiyin Guan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, 4365 Kangxin Road, Shanghai, 201315, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, 4365 Kangxin Road, Shanghai, 201315, China
| | - Jing Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, 4365 Kangxin Road, Shanghai, 201315, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, 4365 Kangxin Road, Shanghai, 201315, China
| | - Jiyi Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, 4365 Kangxin Road, Shanghai, 201315, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, 4365 Kangxin Road, Shanghai, 201315, China
| | - Weixu Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, 4365 Kangxin Road, Shanghai, 201315, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, 4365 Kangxin Road, Shanghai, 201315, China
| | - Jing Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, 4365 Kangxin Road, Shanghai, 201315, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, 4365 Kangxin Road, Shanghai, 201315, China
| | - Xianxin Qiu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, 4365 Kangxin Road, Shanghai, 201315, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, 4365 Kangxin Road, Shanghai, 201315, China
| | - Chaosu Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, 4365 Kangxin Road, Shanghai, 201315, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, 4365 Kangxin Road, Shanghai, 201315, China
| | - Lin Kong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, 4365 Kangxin Road, Shanghai, 201315, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, 4365 Kangxin Road, Shanghai, 201315, China
| | - Jiade J Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, 4365 Kangxin Road, Shanghai, 201315, China. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, 4365 Kangxin Road, Shanghai, 201315, China.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Zoia C, Lombardi F, Custodi VM, Lovati E, Lucotti P, Iannalfi A, D'ippolito E, Valvo F, Bongetta D. Evaluation of the early endocrinological sequelae after hadron therapy on anterior skull base lesions in the adult population. MINERVA ENDOCRINOL 2019; 45:162-164. [PMID: 31738035 DOI: 10.23736/s0391-1977.19.03071-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Cesare Zoia
- Neurosurgery Unit, IRCCS San Matteo Polyclinic Hospital and Foundation, Pavia, Italy -
| | - Francesco Lombardi
- Neurosurgery Unit, IRCCS San Matteo Polyclinic Hospital and Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Viola M Custodi
- Neurosurgery Unit, IRCCS San Matteo Polyclinic Hospital and Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Lovati
- Endocrinology Unit, Internal Medicine I, IRCCS San Matteo Polyclinic Hospital and Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Pietro Lucotti
- Endocrinology Unit, Internal Medicine I, IRCCS San Matteo Polyclinic Hospital and Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Alberto Iannalfi
- Clinical Radiotherapy Unit, National Center of Oncological Hadron Therapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Emma D'ippolito
- Clinical Radiotherapy Unit, National Center of Oncological Hadron Therapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Francesca Valvo
- Clinical Radiotherapy Unit, National Center of Oncological Hadron Therapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Daniele Bongetta
- Neurosurgery Unit, Ospedale Fatebenefratelli e Oftalmico, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Mohamed Ali A, Mathis T, Bensadoun RJ, Thariat J. Radiation induced optic neuropathy: Does treatment modality influence the risk? Bull Cancer 2019; 106:1160-1176. [PMID: 31757405 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2019.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2019] [Revised: 06/29/2019] [Accepted: 09/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Radiation induced optic neuropathy (RION) is a rare but disastrous complication of radiation therapy in treatment of periorbital tumors. The objective of this study is to investigate the incidence of RION in series of patients treated from peri orbital tumors by recent photon and proton irradiation modalities. We searched the Pub Med database for studies in periorbital tumors including base of skull, sinonasal, pituitary, nasopharyngeal tumors and craniopharyngioma treated with Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and with proton beam therapy (PBT) between 1992 and 2017 excluding metastatic tumors, lymphomas, pediatric series, those treated mainly with chemotherapy, target therapy and those written in languages other than English and French. The result retrieved 421 articles that were revised by the panel. Fourteen articles with IMRT and 27 with PBT reported usable data for the review from which 31studies that had pointed to the doses to the optic nerve (ON) and/or optic chiasm (OC) and incidence of RION have been analyzed. We have found that the incidence of RION had been reported fairly in both modalities and many other factors related to the patient, tumor, and irradiation process interplay in its development. We have concluded that proper treatment planning, good selection of treatment modality, adherence to dose constraints applied to critical structures all along with regular oncological and ophthalmological follow up, control of co-morbidities and early intervention, could help reducing its magnitude.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Mohamed Ali
- Sohag University, Sohag University Hospital, Department of Clinical Oncology, Sohag East, 82524 Sohag, Egypt
| | - Thibaud Mathis
- Croix-Rousse University Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, 103, grande rue de la Croix-Rousse, Lyon, France; UMR-CNRS 5510, Mateis, Villeurbanne, Lyon, France
| | | | - Juliette Thariat
- Centre François-Baclesse/ARCHADE, Department of Radiation Oncology, 3, avenue General Harris, 14000 Caen, France; Unicaen - Normandie Université, laboratoire de physique corpusculaire IN2P3/ENSICAEN - UMR6534, boulevard du Marechal Juin, 14050 Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Orlandi E, Cavalieri S, Granata R, Nicolai P, Castelnuovo P, Piazza C, Schreiber A, Turri-Zanoni M, Quattrone P, Miceli R, Infante G, Sessa F, Facco C, Calareso G, Iacovelli NA, Mattavelli D, Paderno A, Resteghini C, Locati LD, Licitra L, Bossi P. Locally advanced epithelial sinonasal tumors: The impact of multimodal approach. Laryngoscope 2019; 130:857-865. [PMID: 31369156 DOI: 10.1002/lary.28202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2019] [Revised: 06/04/2019] [Accepted: 07/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Outcomes of locally advanced epithelial sinonasal cancers remain unsatisfactory; moreover, only limited and heterogeneous data exist on prognostic factors. METHODS We reviewed all consecutive patients with American Joint Committee Cancer stage III to IV epithelial sinonasal cancers treated with platinum-based induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by locoregional treatment between 1996 and 2015. RESULTS We identified 69 patients treated with a multimodal approach (IC, surgery, radiotherapy). Overall, 44 patients recurred (64%). Of those, 19 patients received salvage surgery, but only four remained disease-free. Median overall survival (OS) was 62.5 months. Sinonasal neuroendocrine and small cell histotypes (P = 0.0085), neuroendocrine differentiation (P = 0.006), and lack of response to IC (P = 0.03) were associated with worse OS. In patients who recurred, median OS was 13 months since recurrence. Survival was longer in patients submitted to salvage surgery (44%) than in those receiving chemotherapy alone at recurrence (29.5 vs. 4.6 months). Patients with a clinical benefit after palliative chemotherapy had a longer median OS than those with disease progression (29.2 vs. 4.4 months; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Globally, the prognosis of locally advanced epithelial sinonasal cancers is dismal, with worse outcomes for neuroendocrine lesions. In the recurrent setting, feasibility of salvage surgery and clinical benefit from palliative chemotherapy are associated with longer OS. A multimodal treatment strategy with IC seems to offer improved OS when compared with other retrospective series not employing such a therapeutic tool. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4 Laryngoscope, 130:857-865, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ester Orlandi
- Radiation Oncology Department, The University of Milan, Milan
| | - Stefano Cavalieri
- the Head and Neck Medical Oncology Department, The University of Milan, Milan
| | - Roberta Granata
- the Head and Neck Medical Oncology Department, The University of Milan, Milan
| | - Piero Nicolai
- the Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Brescia, Brescia
| | - Paolo Castelnuovo
- the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Insubria and ASST Sette Laghi, Ospedale di Circolo, Varese, Italy
| | - Cesare Piazza
- the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Maxillofacial and Thyroid Surgery, The University of Milan, Milan
| | - Alberto Schreiber
- the Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Brescia, Brescia
| | - Mario Turri-Zanoni
- the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Insubria and ASST Sette Laghi, Ospedale di Circolo, Varese, Italy
| | - Pasquale Quattrone
- the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Milan, Milan
| | - Rosalba Miceli
- the Unit of Clinical Epidemiology and Trial Organization, The University of Milan, Milan
| | - Gabriele Infante
- the Unit of Clinical Epidemiology and Trial Organization, The University of Milan, Milan
| | - Fausto Sessa
- the Department of Pathology, University of Insubria and ASST Sette Laghi, Ospedale di Circolo, Varese, Italy
| | - Carla Facco
- the Department of Pathology, University of Insubria and ASST Sette Laghi, Ospedale di Circolo, Varese, Italy
| | | | | | - Davide Mattavelli
- the Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Brescia, Brescia
| | - Alberto Paderno
- the Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Brescia, Brescia
| | - Carlo Resteghini
- the Head and Neck Medical Oncology Department, The University of Milan, Milan
| | | | - Lisa Licitra
- the Head and Neck Medical Oncology Department, The University of Milan, Milan.,Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, the University of Milan, Milan
| | - Paolo Bossi
- the Head and Neck Medical Oncology Department, The University of Milan, Milan.,the University of Brescia, Brescia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Fatima N, Meola A, Pollom EL, Soltys SG, Chang SD. Stereotactic radiosurgery versus stereotactic radiotherapy in the management of intracranial meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Focus 2019; 46:E2. [DOI: 10.3171/2019.3.focus1970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Accepted: 03/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVEStereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) have been used as a primary treatment or adjuvant to resection in the management of intracranial meningiomas (ICMs). The aim of this analysis is to compare the safety and long-term efficacy of SRS and SRT in patients with primary or recurrent ICMs.METHODSA systematic review of the literature comparing SRT and SRS in the same study was conducted using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and EMBASE from January 1980 to December 2018. Randomized controlled trials, case-control studies, and cohort studies (prospective and retrospective) analyzing SRS versus SRT for the treatment of ICMs in adult patients (age > 16 years) were included. Pooled and subgroup analyses were based on the fixed-effect model.RESULTSA total of 1736 patients from 12 retrospective studies were included. The treatment modality used was: 1) SRS (n = 306), including Gamma Knife surgery (n = 36), linear accelerator (n = 261), and CyberKnife (n = 9); or 2) SRT (n = 1430), including hypofractionated SRT (hFSRT, n = 268) and full-fractionated SRT (FSRT, n = 1162). The median age of patients at the time of treatment was 59 years. The median follow-up duration after treatment was 35.5 months. The median tumor volumes at the time of treatment with SRS, hFSRT, and FSRT were 2.84 cm3, 5.45 cm3, and 12.75 cm3, respectively. The radiographic tumor control at last follow-up was significantly worse in patients who underwent SRS than SRT (odds ratio [OR] 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27–0.82, p = 0.007) with 7% less volume of tumor shrinkage (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.61–1.40, p = 0.72). Compared to SRS, the radiographic tumor control was better achieved by FSRT (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.26–0.80, p = 0.006) than by hFSRT (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.21–3.17, p = 0.76). Moreover, SRS leads to a significantly higher risk of clinical neurological worsening during follow-up (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.06–4.06, p = 0.03) and of immediate symptomatic edema (OR 4.58, 95% CI 1.67–12.56, p = 0.003) with respect to SRT. SRT could produce a better progression-free survival at 4–10 years compared to SRS, but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.29).CONCLUSIONSSRS and SRT are both safe options in the management of ICMs. However, SRT carries a better radiographic tumor control rate and a lower incidence of posttreatment symptomatic worsening and symptomatic edema, with respect to SRS. However, further prospective studies are still needed to validate these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nida Fatima
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto; and
| | - Antonio Meola
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto; and
| | - Erqi L. Pollom
- 2Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Scott G. Soltys
- 2Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Steven D. Chang
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto; and
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Zanoletti E, Mazzoni A, Martini A, Abbritti RV, Albertini R, Alexandre E, Baro V, Bartolini S, Bernardeschi D, Bivona R, Bonali M, Borghesi I, Borsetto D, Bovo R, Breun M, Calbucci F, Carlson ML, Caruso A, Cayé-Thomasen P, Cazzador D, Champagne PO, Colangeli R, Conte G, D'Avella D, Danesi G, Deantonio L, Denaro L, Di Berardino F, Draghi R, Ebner FH, Favaretto N, Ferri G, Fioravanti A, Froelich S, Giannuzzi A, Girasoli L, Grossardt BR, Guidi M, Hagen R, Hanakita S, Hardy DG, Iglesias VC, Jefferies S, Jia H, Kalamarides M, Kanaan IN, Krengli M, Landi A, Lauda L, Lepera D, Lieber S, Lloyd SLK, Lovato A, Maccarrone F, Macfarlane R, Magnan J, Magnoni L, Marchioni D, Marinelli JP, Marioni G, Mastronardi V, Matthies C, Moffat DA, Munari S, Nardone M, Pareschi R, Pavone C, Piccirillo E, Piras G, Presutti L, Restivo G, Reznitsky M, Roca E, Russo A, Sanna M, Sartori L, Scheich M, Shehata-Dieler W, Soloperto D, Sorrentino F, Sterkers O, Taibah A, Tatagiba M, Tealdo G, Vlad D, Wu H, Zanetti D. Surgery of the lateral skull base: a 50-year endeavour. ACTA OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGICA ITALICA : ORGANO UFFICIALE DELLA SOCIETA ITALIANA DI OTORINOLARINGOLOGIA E CHIRURGIA CERVICO-FACCIALE 2019; 39:S1-S146. [PMID: 31130732 PMCID: PMC6540636 DOI: 10.14639/0392-100x-suppl.1-39-2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Disregarding the widely used division of skull base into anterior and lateral, since the skull base should be conceived as a single anatomic structure, it was to our convenience to group all those approaches that run from the antero-lateral, pure lateral and postero-lateral side of the skull base as “Surgery of the lateral skull base”. “50 years of endeavour” points to the great effort which has been made over the last decades, when more and more difficult surgeries were performed by reducing morbidity. The principle of lateral skull base surgery, “remove skull base bone to approach the base itself and the adjacent sites of the endo-esocranium”, was then combined with function preservation and with tailoring surgery to the pathology. The concept that histology dictates the extent of resection, balancing the intrinsic morbidity of each approach was the object of the first section of the present report. The main surgical approaches were described in the second section and were conceived not as a step-by-step description of technique, but as the highlighthening of the surgical principles. The third section was centered on open issues related to the tumor and its treatment. The topic of vestibular schwannoma was investigated with the current debate on observation, hearing preservation surgery, hearing rehabilitation, radiotherapy and the recent efforts to detect biological markers able to predict tumor growth. Jugular foramen paragangliomas were treated in the frame of radical or partial surgery, radiotherapy, partial “tailored” surgery and observation. Surgery on meningioma was debated from the point of view of the neurosurgeon and of the otologist. Endolymphatic sac tumors and malignant tumors of the external auditory canal were also treated, as well as chordomas, chondrosarcomas and petrous bone cholesteatomas. Finally, the fourth section focused on free-choice topics which were assigned to aknowledged experts. The aim of this work was attempting to report the state of the art of the lateral skull base surgery after 50 years of hard work and, above all, to raise questions on those issues which still need an answer, as to allow progress in knowledge through sharing of various experiences. At the end of the reading, if more doubts remain rather than certainties, the aim of this work will probably be achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Zanoletti
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - A Mazzoni
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - A Martini
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - R V Abbritti
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière Hospital, University of Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | | | - E Alexandre
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - V Baro
- Academic Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience DNS, University of Padova Medical School, Padova, Italy
| | - S Bartolini
- Neurosurgery, Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - D Bernardeschi
- AP-HP, Groupe Hôspital-Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Neuro-Sensory Surgical Department and NF2 Rare Disease Centre, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - R Bivona
- ENT and Skull-Base Surgery Department, Department of Neurosciences, Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - M Bonali
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Modena, Italy
| | - I Borghesi
- Neurosurgery, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola (RA), Italy
| | - D Borsetto
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - R Bovo
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - M Breun
- Department of Neurosurgery, Julius Maximilians University Hospital Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany
| | - F Calbucci
- Neurosurgery, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola (RA), Italy
| | - M L Carlson
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - A Caruso
- Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza-Rome, Italy
| | - P Cayé-Thomasen
- The Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - D Cazzador
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Section of Human Anatomy, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - P-O Champagne
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière Hospital, University of Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | - R Colangeli
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - G Conte
- Department of Neuroradiology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | - D D'Avella
- Academic Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience DNS, University of Padova Medical School, Padova, Italy
| | - G Danesi
- ENT and Skull-Base Surgery Department, Department of Neurosciences, Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - L Deantonio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - L Denaro
- Academic Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience DNS, University of Padova Medical School, Padova, Italy
| | - F Di Berardino
- Unit of Audiology, Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milano, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | - R Draghi
- Neurosurgery, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola (RA), Italy
| | - F H Ebner
- Department of Neurosurgery, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - N Favaretto
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - G Ferri
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Modena, Italy
| | | | - S Froelich
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière Hospital, University of Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | | | - L Girasoli
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - B R Grossardt
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - M Guidi
- Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza-Rome, Italy
| | - R Hagen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery, "Julius-Maximilians" University Hospital of Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany
| | - S Hanakita
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière Hospital, University of Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | - D G Hardy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - V C Iglesias
- ENT and Skull-Base Surgery Department, Department of Neurosciences, Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - S Jefferies
- Oncology Department, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - H Jia
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Ninh People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiatong University School of Medicine, China
| | - M Kalamarides
- AP-HP, Groupe Hôspital-Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Neuro-Sensory Surgical Department and NF2 Rare Disease Centre, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - I N Kanaan
- Department of Neurosciences, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Alfaisal University, College of Medicine, Riyadh, KSA
| | - M Krengli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - A Landi
- Academic Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience DNS, University of Padova Medical School, Padova, Italy
| | - L Lauda
- Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza-Rome, Italy
| | - D Lepera
- ENT & Skull-Base Department, Ospedale Nuovo di Legnano, Legnano (MI), Italy
| | - S Lieber
- Department of Neurosurgery, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - S L K Lloyd
- Department of Neuro-Otology and Skull-Base Surgery Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | - A Lovato
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Audiology Unit, Padova University, Treviso, Italy
| | - F Maccarrone
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Modena, Italy
| | - R Macfarlane
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - J Magnan
- University Aix-Marseille, France
| | - L Magnoni
- Unit of Audiology, Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milano, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | - D Marchioni
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Verona, Italy
| | | | - G Marioni
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | | | - C Matthies
- Department of Neurosurgery, Julius Maximilians University Hospital Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany
| | - D A Moffat
- Department of Neuro-otology and Skull Base Surgery, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - S Munari
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - M Nardone
- ENT Department, Treviglio (BG), Italy
| | - R Pareschi
- ENT & Skull-Base Department, Ospedale Nuovo di Legnano, Legnano (MI), Italy
| | - C Pavone
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | | | - G Piras
- Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza-Rome, Italy
| | - L Presutti
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Modena, Italy
| | - G Restivo
- ENT and Skull-Base Surgery Department, Department of Neurosciences, Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - M Reznitsky
- The Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - E Roca
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière Hospital, University of Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | - A Russo
- Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza-Rome, Italy
| | - M Sanna
- Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza-Rome, Italy
| | - L Sartori
- Academic Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience DNS, University of Padova Medical School, Padova, Italy
| | - M Scheich
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery, "Julius-Maximilians" University Hospital of Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany
| | - W Shehata-Dieler
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery, "Julius-Maximilians" University Hospital of Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany
| | - D Soloperto
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Verona, Italy
| | - F Sorrentino
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - O Sterkers
- AP-HP, Groupe Hôspital-Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Neuro-Sensory Surgical Department and NF2 Rare Disease Centre, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - A Taibah
- Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza-Rome, Italy
| | - M Tatagiba
- Department of Neurosurgery, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - G Tealdo
- Department of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Padova, Italy
| | - D Vlad
- Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza-Rome, Italy
| | - H Wu
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Ninh People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiatong University School of Medicine, China
| | - D Zanetti
- Unit of Audiology, Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milano, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Holtzman AL, Rotondo RL, Rutenberg MS, Indelicato DJ, Mercado CE, Rao D, Tavanaiepour D, Morris CG, Louis D, Flampouri S, Mendenhall WM. Proton therapy for skull-base chondrosarcoma, a single-institution outcomes study. J Neurooncol 2019; 142:557-563. [PMID: 30827010 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-019-03129-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2018] [Accepted: 02/18/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of definitive or adjuvant external-beam proton therapy on local control and survival in patients with skull-base chondrosarcoma. METHODS We reviewed the medical records of 43 patients with a median age of 49 years (range, 23-80 years) treated with double-scattered 3D conformal proton therapy for skull-base chondrosarcomas between January 2007 and February 2016. Proton therapy-related toxicities were scored using CTCAE v4.0. RESULTS The median radiotherapy dose was 73.8 Gy(RBE) (range, 64.5-74.4 Gy[RBE]). Thirty-six (84%) and 7 (16%) patients underwent surgical resection or biopsy alone. Tumor grade distribution included: grade 1, 19 (44%) patients; grade 2, 22 (51%); and grade 3, 2 (5%). Forty patients had gross disease at the time of radiotherapy and 7 patients were treated for locally recurrent disease following surgery. The median follow-up was 3.7 years (range, 0.7-10.1 years). There were no acute grade 3 toxicities related to RT. At 4 years following RT, actuarial rates of overall survival, cause-specific survival, local control, and RT-related grade 3 toxicity-free survival were 95%, 100%, 89%, and 95%. CONCLUSION High-dose, double-scattered 3D conformal proton therapy alone or following surgical resection for skull-base chondrosarcoma is an effective treatment with a high rate of local control with no acute grade 3 radiation-related toxicity. Further follow-up of this cohort is necessary to better characterize long-term disease control and late toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam L Holtzman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, 2015 N Jefferson St, Jacksonville, FL, 32206, USA.
| | - Ronny L Rotondo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, 2015 N Jefferson St, Jacksonville, FL, 32206, USA
| | - Michael S Rutenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, 2015 N Jefferson St, Jacksonville, FL, 32206, USA
| | - Daniel J Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, 2015 N Jefferson St, Jacksonville, FL, 32206, USA
| | - Catherine E Mercado
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, 2015 N Jefferson St, Jacksonville, FL, 32206, USA
| | - Dinesh Rao
- Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Daryoush Tavanaiepour
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Christopher G Morris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, 2015 N Jefferson St, Jacksonville, FL, 32206, USA
| | - Debbie Louis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, 2015 N Jefferson St, Jacksonville, FL, 32206, USA
| | - Stella Flampouri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, 2015 N Jefferson St, Jacksonville, FL, 32206, USA
| | - William M Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, 2015 N Jefferson St, Jacksonville, FL, 32206, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Palm RF, Oliver DE, Yang GQ, Abuodeh Y, Naghavi AO, Johnstone PAS. The role of dose escalation and proton therapy in perioperative or definitive treatment of chondrosarcoma and chordoma: An analysis of the National Cancer Data Base. Cancer 2019; 125:642-651. [PMID: 30644538 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2018] [Revised: 11/02/2018] [Accepted: 11/28/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chordomas and chondrosarcomas are a rare but challenging subset of tumors to treat; however, previous studies have shown benefits from proton therapy, which are thought to be primarily driven by prescription conformality permitting homogeneous tumor dosing and the allowance of higher doses. No retrospective studies to date have directly compared the outcomes of conventional and particle therapy or examined the role of high doses (specifically ≥70 Gy) in definitive radiotherapy (DRT) or perioperative radiotherapy (PRT) for both types of malignancies. METHODS A total of 863 patients with chondrosarcoma and 715 patients with chordoma treated with nonpalliative proton or conventional radiation therapy with a dose range of 20 to 80 Gy and at least 15 months of follow-up were identified from the National Cancer Data Base for the years 2003-2014. The primary endpoint of overall survival (OS) was evaluated, and clinical features, including age, sex, grade, clinical stage, and Charlson-Deyo comorbidity index, were compared. RESULTS Patients receiving DRT were older and had more advanced disease. In DRT for chondrosarcoma, a high dose (40.6% vs 16.9%; P = .006) and proton therapy (75.0% vs 19.1%; P = .046) were associated with improved OS at 5 years in a multivariate analysis. In DRT for chordoma, proton therapy was associated with improved OS at 5 years in a multivariate analysis (100% vs 34.1%; P = .031), and a high dose for chordoma was significant for improved OS in a univariate analysis with both DRT (79.0% vs 54.1%; P = .027) and PRT (83.3% vs 77.4%; P = .007). CONCLUSIONS In the largest retrospective series to date, dose escalation and proton radiotherapy were associated with improved OS in patients with chondrosarcoma and chordoma despite limited follow-up and access to particle therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Russell F Palm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Daniel E Oliver
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - George Q Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Yazan Abuodeh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Arash O Naghavi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Peter A S Johnstone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches for Treatment of Craniovertebral Junction Tumours. ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA. SUPPLEMENT 2019; 125:209-224. [PMID: 30610324 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-62515-7_30] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Tumours involving the craniovertebral junction (CVJ) are challenging because of their local invasiveness and high recurrence rates, as well as their proximity to critical neurovascular structures and the difficulty of reconstructing the resulting skull base defect at this site. Several surgical techniques are currently available to access these lesions, including the far lateral, extreme lateral, direct lateral, transcervical, transoral and transnasal approaches. In this paper, application of the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) in the treatment of CVJ tumours is analysed. The indications, contraindications, preoperative workup, step-by-step surgical technique, skull base reconstruction options and postoperative management are described. The advantages and limitations of the EEA are also discussed. Finally, a systematic review of the literature is provided to elucidate the levels of evidence supporting the use of the EEA in this field. Employment of this approach to the CVJ has contributed to high success rates in achieving gross total resection of tumours and improvement in neurological symptoms. Intraoperative and postoperative complication rates are acceptable, with cerebrospinal fluid leakage being the major concern (with a 17-25% incidence). Moreover, in comparison with traditional approaches to the CVJ, the EEA provides lower rates of postoperative dysphagia and respiratory complications. Use of the EEA for treatment of CVJ tumours appears to be a rational alternative to the conventional transoral, transcranial and transcervical approaches in selected cases. Multidisciplinary teamwork including different specialists-such as medical and radiation oncologists, radiologists, otorhinolaryngologists and neurosurgeons-is strongly recommended for the purpose of offering the best treatment strategy for the patient.
Collapse
|
30
|
van Koevering K, Prevedello DM, Carrau RL. Endoscopic endonasal approaches for the management of cranial base malignancies: histologically guided treatment and clinical outcomes. J Neurosurg Sci 2018; 62:667-681. [PMID: 29808637 DOI: 10.23736/s0390-5616.18.04507-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Malignancies of the skull base represent a highly diverse and challenging set of pathologies which exhibit a wide array of oncologic behavior. In recent decades, a number of important advances in treatment technique have evolved to improve oncologic outcomes and reduce morbidity in the treatment of these aggressive cancers. Intensity modulated radiation therapy has become the gold standard in radiotherapy owing to its precision planning and reduced morbidity. However heavy ion particle radiation (proton therapy, carbon ion, etc.) are recently emerging with promising results at the skull base related to the reduced exit dose to adjacent structures. Novel systemic therapeutics such as targeted and immunotherapies may dramatically alter the treatment paradigm for many of these pathologies. Nevertheless, most skull base malignancies remain surgical diseases. The evolution of the expanded endonasal approach for a minimally invasive surgical resection has proven validity in treating many of these pathologies when properly selected, and have largely supplanted open approaches owing to the reduced morbidity profile. In spite of these important advances, the most critical aspect in comprehensive treatment is a detailed understanding of the oncologic behavior and outcomes data for each of the specific histopathologies encountered at the skull base. The nuances in management strategy, histologic profile, and surveillance planning can be stratified through the development of a comprehensive, multidisciplinary skull base team to maximize therapeutic effect and minimize morbidity for each patient. This review aims to summarize the key body of data and approaches for each of the histologies frequently encountered in the skull base, while highlighting the value and technique of endonasal approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle van Koevering
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Wexner Medical Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Daniel M Prevedello
- Department of Neurosurgery, Wexner Medical Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Ricardo L Carrau
- Department of Neurosurgery, Wexner Medical Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA -
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Brahimi Y, Antoni D, Srour R, Proust F, Cebula H, Labani A, Noël G. [Base of the skull meningioma: Efficacy, clinical tolerance and radiological evaluation after radiotherapy]. Cancer Radiother 2018; 22:264-286. [PMID: 29773473 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2017.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2017] [Revised: 09/15/2017] [Accepted: 09/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Skull base meningioma leads to functional disturbances, which can significantly alter the quality of life. The optimal management of these lesions, whose goals are neurological preservation and tumour local control, is not yet clearly established. It is widely recognized that the goal of a radical excision should be abandoned despite the advances in the field of microsurgery of skull base lesions. Although less morbid, partial tumour excision would be associated with increased risk of local tumour recurrence. Although discussed both exclusive and adjuvant have proven to be highly successful in terms of clinical improvement and local control. Various radiation techniques have demonstrated their efficacy in the management of this pathology. However, high rates of clinical improvement are in contrast with low rates of radiological improvement. The notion of clinical and radiological dissociation appeared. However, in most of these studies, the analysis of the radiological response could be subject of legitimate criticism. This work proposes to review the local control, the efficacy and the clinical tolerance and the radiological response of the various radiation techniques for the meningioma of the base of the skull and to demonstrate the interest of quantitative volumetric analyses in the follow-up of meningioma after radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Brahimi
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Paul-Strauss, Unicancer, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67065 Strasbourg cedex, France
| | - D Antoni
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Paul-Strauss, Unicancer, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67065 Strasbourg cedex, France; Laboratoire de radiobiologie, UMR 7178 institut pluridisciplinaire Hubert-Curien (IPHC), université de Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France; CNRS, IPHC UMR 7178, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - R Srour
- Service de neurochirurgie, hôpital Pasteur, 39, avenue de la Liberté, 68024 Colmar cedex, France
| | - F Proust
- Service de neurochirurgie, hôpital universitaire de Strasbourg, 1, rue Molière, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - H Cebula
- Service de neurochirurgie, hôpital universitaire de Strasbourg, 1, rue Molière, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - A Labani
- Service de radiologie, hôpital universitaire de Strasbourg, 1, place de l'Hôpital, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - G Noël
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Paul-Strauss, Unicancer, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67065 Strasbourg cedex, France; Laboratoire de radiobiologie, UMR 7178 institut pluridisciplinaire Hubert-Curien (IPHC), université de Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France; CNRS, IPHC UMR 7178, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Effects of high-dose radiation using protons and photons on bone are relatively unexplored, but high rates of insufficiency fractures are reported, and the causes of this are incompletely understood. Imaging studies with pre- and postradiation scans can help one understand the effect of radiation on bone. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of high-dose radiation on the trabecular density of bone in the sacrum using CT-derived Hounsfield units (HU). METHODS Between 2009 and 2015, we treated 57 patients (older then 18 years) with sacral chordoma. Fourteen (25%) of them were treated with radiation only. The general indication for this approach is inoperability resulting from tumor size. Forty-two (74%) patients were treated with transverse sacral resections and high-dose radiotherapy (using either protons or photons or a combination) before surgery and after surgery. During this time period, our indication for this approach generally was symptomatic sacral chordoma in which resection would prevent further growth and reasonable sacrifice of nerve roots was possible. Of those patients, 21 (50%) had CT scans both before and after radiation treatment. We used HU as a surrogate for bone density. CT uses HU to derive information on tissue and bone quantity. A recent study presented reference HU values for normal (mean 133 ± 38 HU), osteoporotic (101 ± 25 HU), and osteopenic bone (79 ± 32 HU). To adjust for scanning protocol-induced changes in HU, we calculated the ratio between bone inside and outside the radiation field rather than using absolute values. To assess the effect of radiation, we tested whether there was a difference in ratio (sacrum/L1) before and after radiation. A control measurement was performed (L2/L1) and also tested for a difference before and after radiation. Statistical analyses were performed using the paired t-test. RESULTS The effects of radiation appeared confined to the intended field, because the bone density outside the treated field was not observed to decrease. The ratio of HU (a surrogate for bone density) in L2 relative to L1 did not change after radiotherapy (preradiation mean: 0.979 ± 0.009, postradiation mean: 0.980 ± 0.009, mean difference outside the radiation field: -0.001, 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.009 to 0.007, p = 0.799). The ratio of HU within the radiation field relative to L1 decreased after radiotherapy (preradiation mean: 0.895 ± 0.050, postradiation mean: 0.658 ± 0.050, mean difference inside the radiation field: 0.237, 95% CI, 0.187-0.287, p < 0.001), suggesting the bone density stayed the same outside the radiation field but decreased inside the radiation field. CONCLUSIONS Trabecular bone density decreased after high-dose radiation therapy in a small group of patients with sacral chordoma. High-dose radiation is increasingly gaining acceptance for treating sacral malignancies; further long-term prospective studies using calibrated CT scanners and preferably bone biopsies are needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, therapeutic study.
Collapse
|
33
|
|
34
|
Garibaldi C, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Marvaso G, Dicuonzo S, Rojas DP, Cattani F, Starzyńska A, Ciardo D, Surgo A, Leonardi MC, Ricotti R. Recent advances in radiation oncology. Ecancermedicalscience 2017; 11:785. [PMID: 29225692 PMCID: PMC5718253 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2017.785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) is very much a technology-driven treatment modality in the management of cancer. RT techniques have changed significantly over the past few decades, thanks to improvements in engineering and computing. We aim to highlight the recent developments in radiation oncology, focusing on the technological and biological advances. We will present state-of-the-art treatment techniques, employing photon beams, such as intensity-modulated RT, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, stereotactic body RT and adaptive RT, which make possible a highly tailored dose distribution with maximum normal tissue sparing. We will analyse all the steps involved in the treatment: imaging, delineation of the tumour and organs at risk, treatment planning and finally image-guidance for accurate tumour localisation before and during treatment delivery. Particular attention will be given to the crucial role that imaging plays throughout the entire process. In the case of adaptive RT, the precise identification of target volumes as well as the monitoring of tumour response/modification during the course of treatment is mainly based on multimodality imaging that integrates morphological, functional and metabolic information. Moreover, real-time imaging of the tumour is essential in breathing adaptive techniques to compensate for tumour motion due to respiration. Brief reference will be made to the recent spread of particle beam therapy, in particular to the use of protons, but also to the yet limited experience of using heavy particles such as carbon ions. Finally, we will analyse the latest biological advances in tumour targeting. Indeed, the effectiveness of RT has been improved not only by technological developments but also through the integration of radiobiological knowledge to produce more efficient and personalised treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Garibaldi
- Unit of Medical Physics, European Institute of Oncology, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Marvaso
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Samantha Dicuonzo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Damaris Patricia Rojas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Cattani
- Unit of Medical Physics, European Institute of Oncology, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Starzyńska
- Department of Oral Surgery, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80–211 Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Delia Ciardo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Alessia Surgo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | | | - Rosalinda Ricotti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, 20141 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Proposed Treatment Paradigm for Intracranial Chondrosarcomas Based on Multidisciplinary Coordination. World Neurosurg 2017; 109:e517-e530. [PMID: 29033377 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2017] [Revised: 10/02/2017] [Accepted: 10/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES There was no consensus regarding the treatment of intracranial chondrosarcoma (CSA). The study aimed to evaluate the adverse factors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and to propose a treatment strategy for CSA. METHODS The clinical chart and radiographic data of 106 consecutive cases (mesenchymal and conventional CSA in 18 and 88 patients, respectively) of surgically treated CSAs were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS Gross total resection was achieved in 43 patients (40.6%), and adjuvant radiotherapy was administered in 45 patients. After a mean follow-up duration of 47.8 months, 38 patients (37.3%) experienced recurrence. PFS and disease-specific OS at 5 years was 57.7% and 74.4%. Independent adverse factors for PFS were previous surgery (hazard ratio [HR] 2.261; P = 0.028), increased lesion size (HR, 1.298; P = 0.026), extent of surgical resection (HR, 3.226; P < 0.001), malignant pathology (HR, 2.018; P = 0.003), and postoperative radiotherapy (HR, 3.246; P = 0.001). The stereotactic radiosurgery subgroup presented best 5-year PFS of 88.9%, and a linear accelerator prolonged the mean PFS time (57.0 months) compared with no radiation (38.1 months). In the incomplete resection subgroup (n = 63), radiotherapy significantly benefited tumor control (HR, 2.101; P = 0.016). Extent of surgical resection (HR, 1.797; P = 0.026) and malignant disease (HR, 1.717; P = 0.030) were associated with OS. CONCLUSIONS Intracranial CSAs were not completely amendable by surgery alone. Gross total resection as far as possible plus radiation were necessary for mesenchymal CSA and conventional CSA with active growth or residual tumor. Stereotactic radiosurgery was an alternative if proton therapy was unavailable. A future study with a large cohort is required to verify our findings.
Collapse
|
36
|
Murray FR, Snider JW, Bolsi A, Lomax AJ, Walser M, Kliebsch U, Schneider RA, Weber DC. Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy for Benign and Non-benign Intracranial Meningiomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 99:1190-1198. [PMID: 28939227 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2017] [Revised: 07/24/2017] [Accepted: 08/04/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess and report long-term clinical outcomes regarding local control, overall survival, and toxicity-free survival after pencil beam scanning proton therapy for intracranial meningiomas at a single institution. PATIENTS AND METHODS Ninety-six patients (male/female, 29/67; median age 52.8 years) with intracranial meningiomas (World Health Organization [WHO] grade 1, n=61 [63.5%]; WHO grade 2, n=33 [34.4%]; WHO grade 3, n=2 [2.1%]) were treated with pencil beam scanning proton therapy (n=53 [55.2%] at diagnosis, n=17 [17.7%] at recurrence, and n=26 [27.1%] for tumor progression). Median gross tumor volume before PBSPT was 21.4 cm3 (range, 0.0-546.5 cm3), with a median planning target volume of 123.4 cm3 (range, 4.6-1142.0 cm3). Median duration of follow-up was 56.9 months (range, 12.1-207.2 months). Late toxicity was graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. RESULTS Thirteen failures (14%) (male/female, 6/7) were observed, of which the majority (n=9, 69%) were of non-benign histology. The 5-year actuarial local control and overall survival were 86.4% and 88.2%, respectively. Five-year grade ≥3 toxicity-free survival was 89.1%. On univariate analysis, local control was worse for patients with higher WHO grade (P≤.001), those treated after at least 1 recurrence (P=.006), those with non-skull base tumor location (P=.014), and males (P=.032). Significant prognosticators for 5-year overall survival were local control (P≤.001), age (P=.002), and timing of proton therapy (initial vs recurrence) (P=.002). CONCLUSIONS Pencil beam scanning proton therapy is an effective and safe treatment for patients with intracranial meningiomas, resulting in high local control rates with limited toxicity. Up-front radiation likely results in improved outcomes and should be considered, especially for patients with non-benign tumors and/or for those with incomplete resections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fritz R Murray
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.
| | - James W Snider
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Alessandra Bolsi
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Antony J Lomax
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Marc Walser
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Ulrike Kliebsch
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Ralf A Schneider
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Damien C Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland; University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kulkarni BSN, Bajwa H, Chandrashekhar M, Sharma SD, Singareddy R, Gudipudi D, Ahmad S, Kumar A, Sresty NM, Raju AK. CT- and MRI-based gross target volume comparison in vestibular schwannomas. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2017; 22:201-208. [PMID: 28461783 PMCID: PMC5403802 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2017.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2016] [Revised: 12/31/2016] [Accepted: 02/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM This study represents an enumeration and comparison of gross target volumes (GTV) as delineated independently on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and T1 and T2 weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in vestibular schwannomas (VS). BACKGROUND Multiple imaging in radiotherapy improves target localization. METHODS AND MATERIALS 42 patients of VS were considered for this prospective study with one patient showing bilateral tumor. The GTV was delineated separately on CT and MRI. Difference in volumes were estimated individually for all the 43 lesions and similarity was studied between CT and T1 and T2 weighted MRI. RESULTS The male to female ratio for VS was found to be 1:1.3. The tumor was right sided in 34.9% and left sided in 65.1%. Tumor volumes (TV) on CT image sets were ranging from 0.251 cc to 27.27 cc. The TV for CT, MRI T1 and T2 weighted were 5.15 ± 5.2 cc, 5.8 ± 6.23 cc, and 5.9 ± 6.13 cc, respectively. Compared to MRI, CT underestimated the volumes. The mean dice coefficient between CT versus T1 and CT versus T2 was estimated to be 68.85 ± 18.3 and 66.68 ± 20.3, respectively. The percentage of volume difference between CT and MRI (%VD: mean ± SD for T1; 28.84 ± 15.0, T2; 35.74 ± 16.3) and volume error (%VE: T1; 18.77 ± 10.1, T2; 23.17 ± 13.93) were found to be significant, taking the CT volumes as the baseline. CONCLUSIONS MRI with multiple sequences should be incorporated for tumor volume delineation and they provide a clear boundary between the tumor and normal tissue with critical structures nearby.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Harjot Bajwa
- Basavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Hyderabad 500035, Telangana, India
| | - Mukka Chandrashekhar
- Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Hyderabad, Kukatpally, Hyderabad 500 085, Telangana, India
| | - Sunil Dutt Sharma
- Radiological Physics & Advisory Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, CTCRS, Anushaktinagar, Mumbai 400094, India
| | - Rohith Singareddy
- Basavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Hyderabad 500035, Telangana, India
| | - Dileep Gudipudi
- Basavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Hyderabad 500035, Telangana, India
| | - Shabbir Ahmad
- Basavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Hyderabad 500035, Telangana, India
| | - Alok Kumar
- Clearmedi Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata Area, India
| | - N.V.N. Madusudan Sresty
- Basavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Hyderabad 500035, Telangana, India
| | - Alluri Krishnam Raju
- Basavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Hyderabad 500035, Telangana, India
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Proton therapy is characterized by certain physical properties leading to a reduction in integral dose. As proton therapy becomes more widely available, the ongoing discussion on the real indications for proton therapy becomes more important. In the present article, data on proton therapy for tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) is summarized and discussed in view of modern photon treatments. Still today, no randomized controlled trials are available confirming any clinical benefit of protons in CNS tumors. For certain skull base lesions, such as chordomas and chondrosarcomas, dose escalation is possible with protons thus patients should be referred to a proton center if readily available. For vestibular schwannoma, at present, proton data are inferior to advanced photons. For glioma patients, early data is present for low-grade gliomas, presenting comparable results to photons; dose escalation studies for high-grade gliomas have led to significant side effects, thus strategies of dose-escalation need to rethought. For skull base meningiomas, data from stereotactic series and IMRT present excellent local control with minimal side effects, thus any improvement with protons might only be marginal. The largest benefit is considered in pediatric CNS tumors, due to the intricate radiation sensitivity of children's normal tissue, as well as the potential of long-term survivorship. Long-term data is still lacking, and even recent analyses do not all lead to a clear reduction in side effects with improvement of outcome; furthermore, clinical data seem to be comparable. However, based on the preclinical evidence, proton therapy should be evaluated in every pediatric patient. Protons most likely have a benefit in terms of reduction of long-term side effects, such as neurocognitive sequelae or secondary malignancies; moreover, dose escalation can be performed in radio-resistant histologies. Clinical data with long-term follow-up is still warranted to prove any superiority to advanced photons in CNS tumors. If available, protons should be evaluated for chordoma or chondrosarcoma of the skull base and pediatric tumors. However, many factors are important for excellent oncology care, and no time delay or inferior oncological care should be accepted for the sake of protons only.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. .,Institute of Innovative Radiotherapy (iRT), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, Neuherberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Krengli M. The management of skull base tumours: A challenge claiming for a multidisciplinary collaboration. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2016; 21:285-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2016.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
|