1
|
Śniadecki M, Guani B, Jaworek P, Klasa-Mazurkiewicz D, Mahiou K, Mosakowska K, Buda A, Poniewierza P, Piątek O, Crestani A, Stasiak M, Balaya V, Musielak O, Piłat L, Maliszewska K, Aristei C, Guzik P, Wojtylak S, Liro M, Gaillard T, Kocian R, Gołąbiewska A, Chmielewska Z, Wydra D. Tertiary prevention strategies for micrometastatic lymph node cervical cancer: A systematic review and a prototype of an adapted model of care. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 197:104329. [PMID: 38527594 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We found a need for balancing the application of clinical guidelines and tailored approaches to follow-up of cervical cancer (CC) patients in the lymph node micrometastatic (MICs) setting. This review aimed to determine the current knowledge of management of MIC-positive CC cases. METHODOLOGY We addressed prognostic and risk of recurrence monitoring impacts associated with MIC+ cases. The electronic databases for literature and relevant articles were analysed. RESULTS Fifteen studies, (4882 patients), were included in our systematic review. While the results show that MICs significantly worsen prognosis in early CC. A tertiary prevention algorithm for low volume lymph node disease may stratify follow-up according to the burden of nodal disease and provide data that helps improve follow-up performance. CONCLUSION MICs worsen prognosis and should be managed as suggested by the algorithm. However, this algorithm must be externally validated. The clinical impact of isolated tumor cells (ITC) remains unclear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcin Śniadecki
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
| | - Benedetta Guani
- Hospital of Fribourg HFR, Chemin des Pensionnats 2/6, Villars-sur-Glâne 1752, Switzerland
| | - Paulina Jaworek
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | | | - Katia Mahiou
- Breast, Gynaecology and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Institute Curie, Paris, France
| | - Karolina Mosakowska
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Alessandro Buda
- Department of Gynaecology Oncology, Michele e Pietro Ferrero Hospital, Verduno, Italy
| | | | - Olga Piątek
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Adrien Crestani
- Department of Gynaecological Surgery, Hospital Tenon, Paris, France
| | - Maria Stasiak
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Vincent Balaya
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Félix Guyon Hospital, CHU La Réunion, La Reunion Island, France
| | - Oliwia Musielak
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Transplant and General Surgery, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Luiza Piłat
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Karolina Maliszewska
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Sant'Andrea delle Fratte, Perugia, Italy
| | - Paweł Guzik
- Clinical Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, City Hospital Rzeszów, Rzeszów, Poland
| | - Szymon Wojtylak
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Marcin Liro
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Thomas Gaillard
- Department of Surgery, Institute Curie, University Paris Cite, Paris, France
| | - Roman Kocian
- Department of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Anna Gołąbiewska
- Department of Environmental Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Zuzanna Chmielewska
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Dariusz Wydra
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chiofalo B, Laganà AS, Ghezzi F, Certelli C, Casarin J, Bruno V, Sperduti I, Chiantera V, Peitsidis P, Vizza E. Beyond Sentinel Lymph Node: Outcomes of Indocyanine Green-Guided Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Endometrial and Cervical Cancer. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:3476. [PMID: 36834170 PMCID: PMC9963568 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20043476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of our study was to compare the number of lymph nodes removed during indocyanine green (ICG)-guided laparoscopic/robotic pelvic lymphadenectomy with standard systematic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (EC) and cervical cancer (CC). METHODS This is a multicenter retrospective comparative study (Clinical Trial ID: NCT04246580; updated on 31 January 2023). Women affected by EC and CC who underwent laparoscopic/robotic systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy, with (cases) or without (controls) the use of ICG tracer injection within the uterine cervix, were included in the study. RESULTS The two groups were homogeneous for age (p = 0.08), Body Mass Index, International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages (p = 0.41 for EC; p = 0.17 for CC), median estimated blood loss (p = 0.76), median operative time (p = 0.59), and perioperative complications (p = 0.66). Nevertheless, the number of lymph nodes retrieved during surgery was significantly higher (p = 0.005) in the ICG group (n = 18) compared with controls (n = 16). CONCLUSIONS The accurate and precise dissection achieved with the use of the ICG-guided procedure was associated with a higher number of lymph nodes removed in the case of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy for EC and CC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benito Chiofalo
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Simone Laganà
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, ARNAS “Civico-Di Cristina-Benfratelli”, Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Fabio Ghezzi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Filippo Del Ponte” Women and Children Hospital, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy
| | - Camilla Certelli
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Jvan Casarin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Filippo Del Ponte” Women and Children Hospital, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy
| | - Valentina Bruno
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Isabella Sperduti
- Biostatistical Unit, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Vito Chiantera
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, ARNAS “Civico-Di Cristina-Benfratelli”, Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Panagiotis Peitsidis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helena Venizelou Hospital, 115 21 Athens, Greece
| | - Enrico Vizza
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Koutroumpa I, Diakosavvas M, Sotiropoulou M, Pergialiotis V, Angelou K, Liontos M, Haidopoulos D, Bamias A, Rodolakis A, Thomakos N. Identification and Biopsy of Sentinel Lymph Node in Early-Stage Cervical Carcinoma: Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Utility. Cureus 2022; 14:e23838. [PMID: 35530888 PMCID: PMC9070105 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.23838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Due to the subsequent complications of pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer, the sentinel lymph node (SLN) technique has been increasingly employed. This study aimed to investigate the detectability of SLN using methylene blue and explore the diagnostic accuracy of SLN biopsy. Methodology A study was conducted from September 2015 to August 2018 and included 90 women with cervical cancer, FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics-2009) stage IA1-IIA1. Methylene blue was injected intracervically. Any detected dyed nodes were sent for frozen section biopsy, followed by bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy. The predictive ability of SLN was evaluated in statistical terms after comparison of intraoperative biopsy and final histopathology. Results The sensitivity, specificity, false-negative rate, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (NPV) were 55.6%, 95.1%, 4.9%, 55.6%, and 95.1%, respectively. The SLN performance in patients with tumor size ≤2.2 cm, negative lymphovascular space involvement, and depth of stromal invasion ≤5 mm was superior (sensitivity 100%, specificity 93.5%, NPV 100%). Conclusions The SLN technique with blue dye alone is a feasible and adequate alternative to systematic lymphadenectomy in early-stage cervical cancer in selected patients, given that a strict algorithm is applied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioanna Koutroumpa
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| | - Michail Diakosavvas
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| | - Maria Sotiropoulou
- Department of Pathology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| | - Vasilios Pergialiotis
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| | - Kyveli Angelou
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| | - Michalis Liontos
- Oncology Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| | - Aristotelis Bamias
- 2nd Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| | - Alexandros Rodolakis
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| | - Nikolaos Thomakos
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Understanding the Lymphatics: An Updated Review of the N Category of the AJCC 8th Edition for Urogenital Cancers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021; 217:368-377. [DOI: 10.2214/ajr.20.22997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|
5
|
Chernyshova A, Kolomiets L, Chekalkin T, Chernov V, Sinilkin I, Gunther V, Marchenko E, Baigonakova G, Kang JH. Fertility-Sparing Surgery Using Knitted TiNi Mesh Implants and Sentinel Lymph Nodes: A 10-Year Experience. J INVEST SURG 2020; 34:1110-1118. [PMID: 32281433 DOI: 10.1080/08941939.2020.1745965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this cohort study is to improve the procedure of fertility-sparing surgery and to assess oncological and reproductive follow-up outcomes after radical trachelectomy (RT) for cervical cancer (T1a2-1bNxM0).Methods: We have suggested the method combining sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) and cervicoisthmic cerclage using a superelastic knitted TiNi mesh (KTNM) implant to facilitate the primary biomechanical/retention function of the uterus. Sixty-eight consented patients, who underwent fertility-sparing surgery using both transabdominal and laparoscopic route from 2009 through 2019, were recruited in the study and prospectively followed for a mean of 69 months.Results: There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. No cervical stenoses or mesh failures were noted in all cases. The 5-year overall and recurrence-free survival rates were 100% and 97%, respectively. Two patients indicated recurrence, it occurred in 3 and 36 months. There were 19 (28%) spontaneous pregnancies, 6 resulted in full-term delivery, whereas 2 and 11 ended in miscarriage and early abortion, respectively.Conclusions: This sparing-surgery technique is turned out to be feasible and efficient as allows to achieve well oncologic and fertility outcomes, mimicking the effect of the cervix. It complements existing surgical approaches and may provide further insight into how to overcome challenges even in aggravated cases or previously failed procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alena Chernyshova
- Tomsk Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia
| | - Larisa Kolomiets
- Tomsk Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia.,Siberian State Medical University, Tomsk, Russia
| | - Timofey Chekalkin
- Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russia.,R&D Center, Kang and Park Medical Co, Ochang, Korea
| | - Vladimir Chernov
- Tomsk Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia
| | - Ivan Sinilkin
- Tomsk Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia
| | | | | | | | - Ji Hoon Kang
- R&D Center, Kang and Park Medical Co, Ochang, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rovirosa A. New developments and controversies in cervical cancer. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2018; 23:481-483. [PMID: 30534010 PMCID: PMC6277349 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2018.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Angeles Rovirosa
- Radiation Oncology Dpt, Hospital Clinic i Universitari, Spain
- Fonaments Clinics Dpt, Medicine Barcelona Faculty Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|