Establishment of national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for radiotherapy localisation computer tomography of the head and neck

Advanced Computational Methods for Radiation Dose Optimization in CT

BACKGROUND

In planning radiotherapy treatments, computed tomography (CT) has become a crucial tool. CT scans involve exposure to ionizing radiation, which can increase the risk of cancer and other adverse health effects in patients. Ionizing radiation doses for medical exposure must be kept "As Low As Reasonably Achievable". Very few articles on guidelines for radiotherapy-computed tomography scans are available. This paper reviews the current literature on radiation dose optimization based on the effective dose and diagnostic reference level (DRL) for head, neck, and pelvic CT procedures used in radiation therapy planning. This paper explores the strategies used to optimize radiation doses, and high-quality images for diagnosis and treatment planning.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted on 300 patients with head, neck, and pelvic region cancer in our institution. The DRL, effective dose, volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol), and dose-length product (DLP) for the present and optimized protocol were calculated. DRLs were proposed for the DLP using the 75th percentile of the distribution. The DLP is a measure of the radiation dose received by a patient during a CT scan and is calculated by multiplying the CT dose index (CTDI) by the scan length. To calculate a DRL from a DLP, a large dataset of DLP values obtained from a specific imaging procedure must be collected and can be used to determine the median or 75th-percentile DLP value for each imaging procedure.

RESULTS

Significant variations were found in the DLP, CTDIvol, and effective dose when we compared both the standard protocol and the optimized protocol. Also, the optimized protocol was compared with other diagnostic and radiotherapy CT scan studies conducted by other centers. As a result, we found that our institution's DRL was significantly low. The optimized dose protocol showed a reduction in the CTDIvol (70% and 63%), DLP (60% and 61%), and effective dose (67% and 62%) for both head, neck, and pelvic scans.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimized protocol DRLs were proposed for comparison purposes.

Systematic Review on Diagnostic Reference Levels for Computed Tomography Examinations in Radiation Therapy Planning

Background: In August 2017, the European Commission awarded the "European Study on Clinical Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRL) for X-ray Medical Imaging" project to the European Society of Radiology to provide up-to-date Diagnostic Reference Levels based on clinical indications. This work aimed to conduct an extensive literature review by analyzing the most recent studies published and the data provided by the National Competent Authorities to understand the current situation regarding Diagnostic Reference Levels based on clinical indications for Radiation Therapy Computed Tomography. Objective: To review the literature on established DRLs and methodologies for establishing Diagnostic reference levels in radiation therapy planning computed tomography (RTCT). Methods: Eligibility criteria: A cohort study (observational design) reporting DRLs in adult patients undergoing computed tomography (CT) for radiation therapy for the region head and neck or pelvis were included. The comprehensive literature searches for the relevant studies published between 2000 and 2021 were performed using PubMed, Scopus, CINHAL, Web of Science, and ProQuest. Results: Three hundred fifty-six articles were identified through an extensive literature search. Sixty-eight duplicate reports were removed. The title and abstract of 288 studies were assessed and excluded if they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Sixteen of 288 articles were selected for full-text screening (studies conducted between 2000 and 2021). Five articles were included in the review after the full-text screening. Conclusions: A globally approved standard protocol that includes scanning techniques, dose measurement method, and DRL percentile needs to be established to make a valuable and accurate comparison with international DRLs.

National reference levels of CT procedures dedicated for treatment planning in radiation oncology

OBJECTIVE

To present results of the first national survey on reference levels of CT imaging performed for the treatment planning purposes in radiation oncology in Croatia.

METHODS

Data for CT protocols of five anatomical regions including head, head and neck, pelvis, breast, and thorax were collected at eight radiation oncology departments in Croatia. Data included volume CT dose index (CTDI_vol), dose-length product (DLP), scan length and set of acquisition and reconstruction parameters. Data on a total of 600 patients were collected. Median values of scan length, DLP and CTDI_vol were calculated for each acquisition protocol. Third quartiles of the median CTDI_vol and DLP values were proposed as the national radiotherapy planning reference levels (RPRL).

RESULTS

The largest CoV were assessed for RT Breast (63.8% for CTDI_vol), RT Thorax (79.7% for DLP) and RT H&N (21.2% for scan length). RT Head had the lowest CoV for CTDI_vol (1,9%) and DLP (17,2%), while RT Breast had the lowest coefficient of variation for scan length (12.8%). Proposed national RPRLs are: for RT Head CTDI_vol16cm = 62 mGy and DLP_16cm = 1738 mGy.cm; for RT H&N CTDI_vol16cm = 35 mGy and DLP_16cm = 1444 mGy.cm; for RT Breast CTDI_vol32cm = 16 mGy and DLP_32cm = 731 mGy.cm; for RT Thorax CTDI_vol32cm = 17 mGy and DLP_32cm = 865 mGy.cm; for RT Pelvis CTDI_vol32cm = 20 mGy and DLP_32cm = 1133 mGy.cm.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this study show variations in CT imaging for treatment planning practice at the national level which call for optimization of procedures.

Differences in radiation dose for computed tomography of the brain among pediatric patients at the emergency departments: an observational study

BACKGROUND

Computed tomography (CT) is associated with a risk of cancer development. Strategies to reduce radiation doses vary between centers. We compared radiation doses of CT brain studies between pediatric and general emergency departments (EDs), and determine the proportion studies performed within the reference levels recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP).

METHODS

A retrospective review was carried out in a healthcare network consisting of one pediatric ED and three general hospital EDs. Pediatric patients less than 16 years old with CT brain studies performed between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2018 were included. Information on demographic, diagnosis, volume-averaged computed-tomography dose index and dose length product (DLP) were collected. Effective dose was then calculated from DLP using conversion factors, termed k-coefficients which were derived using a 16 cm head CT dose phantom.

RESULTS

Four hundred and seventy-nine CT brain studies were performed - 379 (79.1%) at the pediatric ED. Seizure (149, 31.1%), head injury (147, 30.7%) and altered mental status (44, 9.2%) were the top three ED diagnoses. The median effective dose estimates were higher in general than pediatric EDs, particularly for those aged > 3 to ≤6 years old [1.57 mSv (IQR 1.42-1.79) versus 1.93 mSv (IQR 1.51-2.28), p = 0.047], > 6 to ≤10 years old [1.43 mSv (IQR 1.27-1.67) versus 1.94 mSv (IQR 1.61-2.59), p = 0.002) and > 10 years old (1.68 mSv (IQR 1.32-1.72) versus 2.03 mSv (IQR 1.58-2.88), p < 0.001). Overall, 233 (48.6%) and 13 (2.7%) studies were within the reference levels recommended by ICRP 60 and 103 respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiation doses for CT brain studies were significantly higher at general EDs and less than half of the studies were within the reference levels recommended by ICRP. The development of diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) as a benchmark and clinical justification for performing CT studies can help reduce the radiation risks in the pediatric population.

Establishment of national diagnostic reference levels for radiotherapy computed tomography simulation procedures in Slovenia

PURPOSE

To propose national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for radiotherapy (RT) computed tomography (CT) localization purposes, compare both CT units used in the largest RT department in the country and to compare gathered results with other published DRLs in order to discover any need of optimization.

METHODS

In total, 1631 patient data (time spend of 4 months) regarding sex, examination type, total dose-length product (DLP) and CTDI_vol was collated on two CT units. Those simulation procedures account for more than 80 % of all simulation procedures performed nationwide. Then, total DLP and CTDI_vol was calculated and mean, median and 3^rd quartile for both units together were presented to determine national DRLs for simulation procedures. The same data was later compared between both units to discover any potential need for optimization.

RESULTS

3^rd quartile values of DLP for abdomen, breast, chest, head, head and neck, pelvis and spine were 1116.2, 606.6, 832.4, 1942.4, 969.2, 677.1 and 1042.4 mGy∙cm, respectively. 3^rd quartile CTDI_vol values for the same sequence of procedures were 18.7, 13.3, 19.2, 76.9, 22.6, 17.9 and 22.2 mGy, respectively. Among the two units, the mentioned dose values were on average significantly higher on one CT unit than on the other unit.

CONCLUSIONS

When comparing collected dose values with other studies, RT CT DRLs showed that radiation doses from our institution were similar or even lower. Some variations were found between both CT units in certain protocols, so exposure parameters should be reviewed and optimized.