A brief history of clozapine in China with a look forward

Letter to the FDA Proposing Major Changes in the US Clozapine Package Insert Supported by Clozapine Experts Worldwide. Part II: A Review of Fatal Outcomes in US Pharmacovigilance Data and Proposed Changes

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND

This is the second part of a 2-part article that proposes improving the United States (US) clozapine package insert. Part II focuses on fatal outcomes and the 5 boxed warnings, 4 specifically for clozapine: severe neutropenia, seizure, orthostatic hypotension and myocarditis, and 1 for all antipsychotics (elderly with dementia).

METHODS

US reports to the World Health Organization's global pharmacovigilance database were analyzed from clozapine's introduction to January 15, 2023.

FINDINGS/RESULTS

The US was the top reporter worldwide for clozapine with 56,003 reports and 9587 associated fatal outcomes. The 4 clozapine boxed warnings were associated with 534 fatal outcomes (218 with severe neutropenia, 131 with seizures, 125 with orthostasis, 36 with myocarditis, 24 with cardiomyopathy, and 0 with mitral valve prolapse). With no boxed warnings, pneumonia was associated with 674 fatal outcomes and increased white blood cell count (a sign of infection) with 596 fatal outcomes. After considering overlaps, pneumonia and increases in white blood cell count explained 900 fatalities, or 9.4% of 9587 fatal outcomes. The Food and Drug Administration continues to focus on severe neutropenia which was associated with only 218 or 2.3% of fatal outcomes, whereas 97.7% of fatal outcomes reported in US clozapine-treated patients had another cause.

IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS

To help prevent future deaths in clozapine-treated patients, the clozapine package insert should focus on fatal outcomes during infections. Part II offers detailed solutions regarding current boxed warnings and lack of a warning for pneumonia and other infections. The Supplementary Material includes letters of support from 124 non-US clozapine experts from 44 countries/regions who support Parts I and II.

Letter to the FDA Proposing Major Changes in the US Clozapine Package Insert Supported by Clozapine Experts Worldwide. Part I: A Review of the Pharmacokinetic Literature and Proposed Changes

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND

Clozapine was approved in the United States (US) using 1989 regulations and knowledge. After 30 years, many sections of the US package insert (PI) are outdated.

METHODS

We comprehensively reviewed the literature to propose PI updates. We present the information in 2 articles. In Part I, we focus on basic pharmacology based on 407 relevant articles. Part II focuses on clinical aspects and pharmacovigilance.

FINDINGS/RESULTS

Based on more recent expectations of Food and Drug Administration regulations, we reviewed clozapine basic pharmacology including the following: 1) clearance, 2) pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and 3) monitoring tools. We identified 9 major problems in the basic pharmacological sections of the PI including the following: 1) in vivo studies indicate that clozapine is dependent on CYP1A2 for its metabolism, 2) the minor role of CYP2D6 in clozapine metabolism requires removing the PI recommendation to lower clozapine doses in CYP2D6 poor metabolizers, 3) in nontoxic concentrations CYP3A4 has a minor role in clozapine metabolism and potent CYP3A4 inhibitors lack clinically relevant effects, 4) several drug-drug interactions need to be updated based on recent literature, 5) systemic inflammation may decrease clozapine metabolism and increase the risk of clozapine intoxication, 6) obesity may decrease clozapine metabolism, 7) patients of Asian and Indigenous American ancestry need lower clozapine doses, 8) personalized titration and c-reactive protein monitoring should be considered until prospective studies are available, and 9) the half-life section needs to be modified to acknowledge that single dosing at night is frequent in the US.

IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS

An improvement in the US clozapine PI may lead to improvement in PIs worldwide.

Pharmacovigilance in Action: Utilizing VigiBase Data to Improve Clozapine Safety

Purpose

Clozapine is an antipsychotic which was approved in 1989 for treatment-resistant schizophrenia in the United States (US). There were few randomized trials before its approval and potentially lethal clozapine adverse drug reactions (ADRs), such as agranulocytosis and myocarditis were identified by pharmacovigilance. VigiBase, the WHO global database, is a cornerstone of international pharmacovigilance efforts for ADR identification during post-marketing surveillance. This systematic review of the literature explores additional contributions to the knowledge of clozapine ADRs from recent VigiBase studies.

Methods

Using the terms "clozapine AND VigiBase" we conducted an article search in PubMed on September 5, 2024. Of the 29 articles, 11 were excluded and 18 described in the Results section.

Results

All clozapine ADRs were described in two VigiBase studies. One on pregnancy indicated no increased risk with clozapine compared with other antipsychotics; the other reported 191,557 clozapine ADRs, including 22,956 fatal outcomes through January 15, 2023, and paid attention to the reporting style of the top 4 reporting countries (the US, the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia). Infections were described in three VigiBase studies where clozapine treatment was associated with infections, respiratory aspiration, and pneumonia. Rapid titration can lead to localized clozapine-induced inflammations including myocarditis, pericarditis or pancreatitis, or generalized inflammations such as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome. Clozapine-induced inflammation was described in four VigiBase studies, two focused on all ages (myocarditis and DRESS) and two on youth (myocarditis and another on pericarditis and pancreatitis). Other specific ADRs were described in nine VigiBase studies (hematological malignancies, rhabdomyolysis, sialorrhea, seizures, diabetes mellitus, drug-induced parkinsonism, withdrawal symptoms, and suicidal behaviors).

Conclusion

The spectrum of respiratory aspiration - aspiration pneumonia - pneumonia and other infections are significant causes of fatal outcomes in clozapine-treated patients. Clozapine had anti-suicidal effects versus other antipsychotics across all VigiBase labels of suicidal behavior.

Optimizing antidepressant and clozapine co-prescription in clinical practice: A systematic review and expert recommendations

OBJECTIVES

To synthesize the information relevant for clinical practice on clozapine-antidepressant co-prescription concerning pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (DDI), adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with the co-prescription, antidepressant add-on for clozapine-resistant symptoms and antidepressant add-on for clozapine-induced ADRs.

METHODS

Articles were identified with MEDLINE, Web of Sciences and PsycINFO search from inception through April 2023. Data were synthesized narratively.

RESULTS

ADRs are most often induced by the co-prescription of antidepressants that inhibit CYP enzymes (fluvoxamine, fluoxetine, paroxetine). Fluvoxamine add-on is hazardous because of its potent inhibition of clozapine metabolism and has few indications (lowering daily number of clozapine tablets, reducing norclozapine-induced metabolic disturbances and other dose-dependent clozapine-induced ADRs). ADR frequency may be reduced by therapeutic drug monitoring and knowledge of other factors impacting clozapine metabolism (pneumonia, inflammation, smoking, etc.). Improvement of negative symptoms is the most documented beneficial effect of antidepressant add-on for clozapine-resistant psychotic symptoms. The add-on antidepressant should be chosen according to its safety profile regarding DDI with clozapine: antidepressants inhibiting clozapine metabolism or increasing the anticholinergic load should be avoided. Other indications of antidepressant add-on (affective or obsessive compulsive symptoms, sialorrhea, and enuresis) are poorly documented.

CONCLUSION

Antidepressant add-on to clozapine is associated with potential benefits in clozapine users as this strategy may contribute to reduce the burden of clozapine-resistant symptoms or of clozapine-induced ADRs. Further studies are needed to determine whether antidepressant add-on can reduce the risk of clozapine discontinuation.

Response rates to sequential trials of antipsychotic medications according to algorithms or treatment guidelines in psychotic disorders. A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is a relative lack of research evaluating the outcomes when treatment guidelines or algorithms for psychotic disorders are followed. This systematic review and meta-analysis determined the response rates to antipsychotic medications at different stages of these algorithms and whether these response rates differ in first episode cohorts.

METHODS

Data sources: A systematic search strategy was conducted across four databases PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO (Ovid) and CINAHL. Studies that had sequential trials of different antipsychotic medications were included. A meta-analysis of proportions was performed using random effects models and sub-group analysis in first episode psychosis studies.

RESULTS

Of the 4078 unique articles screened, fourteen articles, from nine unique studies, were eligible and included 2522 participants. The proportion who experienced a response to any antipsychotic in the first stage of an algorithm was 0.53 (95 % C.I.:0.38,0.68) and this decreased to 0.26 (95 % C.I.:0.15,0.39) in the second stage. When clozapine was used in the third stage, the proportion that achieved a response was 0.43 (95 % C.I. 0.19, 0.69) compared to 0.26 (95 % C.I.:0.05,0.54) if a different antipsychotic was used. Four studies included 907 participants with a first episode of psychosis and the proportions that achieved a response were: 1st stage: 0.63 (95 % C.I.: 0.45, 0.79); 2nd stage: 0.34 (95 % C.I.:0.16,0.55); clozapine 3rd stage: 0.45 (95 % C.I.:0.0,0.97), different antipsychotic 3rd stage: 0.15 (95 % C.I.,0.01,0.37).

DISCUSSION

These findings support the recommendation to have a trial of clozapine after two other antipsychotic medications have been found to be ineffective.

A scoping review of literature on clozapine from former USSR states published in Russian language

OBJECTIVE

Access to literature on clozapine in Russian language remains strikingly limited. We aimed to identify and translate clinical evidence on clozapine-based treatment outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review in PubMed, Embase and scientific indexes from former USSR states searching for articles published in Russian from the database inception till January 2023 and summarized the data in a scoping review (PROSPERO Reg. Number CRD42023386737).

RESULTS

A total of 60 papers were included comprising eight main topic categories: 1) clozapine-related intoxications (n = 20), 2) effectiveness/efficacy and safety of clozapine treatment (n = 14), 3) adverse drug-induced reactions (ADRs) related to clozapine treatment (n = 9), 4) therapeutic drug monitoring for clozapine (n = 5), 5) combination of clozapine and non-pharmacological treatments (n = 4), 6) pharmacoepidemiology of clozapine (n = 3), 7) effects of clozapine on the brain electrical activity (n = 3), and 8) novel clozapine formulations (n = 2). Among clozapine-related intoxications there were reports of criminal poisoning, which was associated with low lethality. Worse outcomes were accompanied by systemic reactions to intoxications. Clinical benefits of hemoadsorption were reported in the management of clozapine-related intoxications. Only half of studies reporting clozapine effectiveness used standardized scales to assess outcomes. Clozapine superiority in treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) was replicated in one trial. No reports of clozapine-related agranulocytosis were identified. Clozapine ranked among most prescribed antipsychotics for TRS and non-TRS.

CONCLUSIONS

As clinical research in former USSR states is advancing to adopt western clinical research standards, comparability and extrapolation of findings is expected to increase, with transfer of older findings to clinical practice being particularly challenging.

Risk of clozapine-associated agranulocytosis and mandatory white blood cell monitoring: Can the regulations be relaxed?

After the introduction of clozapine eight Finnish patients died after developing agranulocytosis. Clozapine was withdrawn from the market and only reintroduced with strict mandatory white blood cell monitoring as long as treatment lasts and thresholds at which clozapine must be discontinued definitively. The fear of agranulocytosis and the need for intensive blood monitoring is the single most important barrier for prescribers and patients alike and leads to underprescription of the only effective and approved medication for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. We summarize evidence that the risk of agranulocytosis is smaller than perceived at the time of reintroduction, is concentrated in the first 18 weeks of treatment, is not greater than with other antipsychotics thereafter and that frequent blood monitoring has not demonstrably decreased the rate of agranulocytosis. Therefore we propose 1) mandatory monitoring of the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) exclusively during the first 18 weeks of clozapine treatment, 2) that thereafter the prescriber and the well-informed patient decide together about further monitoring frequency, 3) that clozapine treatment must be stopped if the ANC falls below 1.0 × 109/L. Continuation of clozapine or a rechallenge are possible if prescriber and patient determine that the benefits outweigh the risks. 4) National registries which control the haematologic monitoring are unnecessary and do not help to reduce clozapine-induced agranulocytosis. They should at least be restricted to the first 18 weeks of clozapine use.

Promoting safer and wider worldwide use of clozapine

This issue focuses on the past, the present and the future of clozapine. Of the 43 clozapine articles, nine are historical articles dealing with the past, 29 deal with the present and five with laboratory assays which may influence its future use. These 43 articles include 219 different authors from 56 countries/regions and five continents.

Can Slow Personalized Titration Using C-Reactive Protein Monitoring Decrease the High Rates and Mortality of Clozapine-Associated Myocarditis Seen in Some Countries? A Call for Research

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND

The hypothesis that slower personalized titration may prevent clozapine-associated myocarditis and decrease the disproportion incidence of 3% found in Australia was not described in a recent Australian article in this journal.

METHODS

Six countries in addition to Australia have published information suggesting a similar incidence of clozapine-associated myocarditis. On September 19, 2023, PubMed searches were updated for articles from the United States, Korea, Japan, Canada, New Zealand, and Turkey.

FINDINGS/RESULTS

An incidence of 3.5% (4/76) was found in a US hospital, but US experts were the first to propose that clozapine-associated myocarditis may be a hypersensitivity reaction associated with rapid titration and possibly preventable. Koreans and Japanese are of Asian ancestry and need lower minimum therapeutic doses for clozapine than patients of European ancestry. A 0.1% (2/1408) incidence of myocarditis during clozapine titration was found in a Korean hospital, but pneumonia incidence was 3.7% (52/1408). In 7 Japanese hospitals, 34% (37/110) of cases of clozapine-associated inflammation were found during faster titrations (based on the official Japanese titration) versus 13% (17/131) during slower titrations (based on the international titration guideline for average Asian patients). Recent limited studies from Canada, New Zealand, and Turkey suggest that slower personalized titration considering ancestry may help prevent clozapine-associated myocarditis.

IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS

Other countries have very limited published data on clozapine-associated myocarditis. Based on a recent Australian case series and these non-Australian studies, the author proposes that Australia (and other countries) should use slow personalized titration for clozapine based on ancestry and c-reactive protein monitoring.

Clozapine-Associated Agranulocytosis: A Systematic Review. Is It Really So Frighteningly Common?

BACKGROUND

Clozapine is a very effective therapeutic option for schizophrenic disorders that have been refractory to most other therapies. This extremely positive aspect clashes easily with an adverse effect of the drug that is deemed to be a very dangerous one: agranulocytosis. We asked whether the mandatory strict hematological follow-up prescribed in the black box warning of clozapine's label is proportioned to the actual incidence of agranulocytosis, considering that is the main reason that such a drug is often used only late in the treatment course.

METHODS

We carried out a systematic review of reports examining clozapine administration and agranulocytosis incidence. We specifically selected those where mild and moderate neutropenia was not used as a trigger to stop administration of clozapine, to better estimate the sheer incidence of agranulocytosis when clozapine was continued even with mild hematological effect, where detected. We used PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and ScienceDirect databases to identify clinical studies conducted between January 1975 and April 2023.

RESULTS

We included 14 studies, mostly retrospective ones, that examined the incidence of hematological adverse effects in patients using clozapine. A total of 2354 subjects were included. The mean age of the subjects was 33.5 years. The mean duration of observation of subjects who took clozapine was 800 days, with a mean daily dose of 319.5 mg per day. Of the 2354 subjects examined, we found that 11 of them experienced agranulocytosis (0.47%).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest the evidence of a lower incidence of agranulocytosis than previously estimated and are in line with more recent meta-analyses. We may therefore think that clinical practice may demand a revision of the approach that both psychiatrists and supervising organizations often take when talking about clozapine.