Comparison of three collection methods for the sodium rhodizonate detection of gunshot residues on hands

Silica and barium: Comparison of microscopic appearance and characterization of effects of silica on cytomorphology

BACKGROUND

Silica from plastic red top sample collection tubes and barium cause recognized artifacts in slide preparations for microscopic examination.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to evaluate and directly compare the microscopic appearance of silica and barium particles and various slide preparation techniques (e.g., use of coverslips, oil immersion, and different stains). A secondary objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of silica particles on cellular morphology after mechanical trauma with cytocentrifugation.

METHODS

Fluid samples (deionized water, pleural effusion, peritoneal effusion, cerebrospinal fluid, and urine) were collected and evaluated in silica- and non-silica-containing tubes. Barium was added to silica and non-silica samples. Direct and cytocentrifuge preparations were compared to evaluate the effect of silica particles on cellular morphology. Preparations were stained with Wright-Giemsa, rhodizonic acid disodium salt, Alizarin Red, Grocott's methenamine silver, and Prussian blue.

RESULTS

Silica and barium particles were identifiable via light microscopy with and without polarized light, although silica particles diminished with immersion oil. Barium particles retained their structure and diminished less under oil. Cytoseal mounting medium for coverslip placement resulted in diminished refractility of silica and some barium particles. Silica particles with mechanical interaction during cytocentrifugation resulted in disrupted cellular morphology with many lysed cells. Silica and barium particles were negative for all special stains tested.

CONCLUSIONS

Silica from plastic red top tubes adversely affects cell morphology in cytocentrifuge preparations, potentially affecting manual differential cell counts and compromising diagnostic interpretation. Samples intended for microscopic evaluation should not be collected in silica-containing tubes.

[Current approaches for sampling to study the traces of gunshot residue]

An overview of researches, mainly by foreign specialists, on current available approaches for sampling to study the traces of gunshot residue (GSR) is presented. The comparative characteristics of traditional methods of samples (use of cotton and gauze tampons, blotting paper, textile fabrics, adhesive tapes, adhesives and vacuum samplers), as well as advanced technologies, including special devices and sorbents, are given. The characteristics of samplings from hands, scalp, nostrils, clothes of examined persons as well as procedures, that allow to increase the duration of GSR detection, are described in details. The importance of GSR sustainability over time is noted. On average, the most likely detection periods of particles are less than 1 hour for samples, collected from hands, more than 1 hour for samples from clothes and 2-3 hours for face. It is possible to detect the GSR particles in hair up to 24 h., and in nasal mucus after 6 h. of shot. The methods of identification and determination for analytes of inorganic and organic nature are discussed. The most common methods for determining heavy metal particles are atomic spectrometry, namely atomic absorption with electrothermal atomization and atomic emission. The combination of scanning laser ablation and mass-spectrometry with inductively coupled plasma makes it possible to detect more than 15 analytes in a single sample. Scanning electron microscopy with X-ray detectors is effective for the examination of powder particles. The described methods of sampling complement each other increasing the possibility of evidence base for court proceedings.