1
|
van Rees CB, Naslund L, Hernandez-Abrams DD, McKay SK, Woodson CB, Rosemond A, McFall B, Altman S, Wenger SJ. A strategic monitoring approach for learning to improve natural infrastructure. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2022; 832:155078. [PMID: 35398422 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Revised: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/03/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Natural infrastructure (NI) development, including ecosystem restoration, is an increasingly popular approach to leverage ecosystem services for sustainable development, climate resilience, and biodiversity conservation goals. Although implementation and planning for these tools is accelerating, there is a critical need for effective post-implementation monitoring to accumulate performance data and evidence for best practices. The complexity and longer time scales associated with NI, compounded by differing disciplinary definitions and concepts of monitoring necessitate a deliberate and strategic approach to monitoring that encompasses different timeframes and objectives. This paper outlines a typology of monitoring classes differentiated by temporal scale, purpose of data collection, the information benefits of monitoring, and the responsible party. Next, we provide a framework and practical guidelines for designing monitoring plans for NI around learning objectives. In particular, we emphasize conducting research and development monitoring, which provides scientifically rigorous evidence for methodological improvement beyond the project scale. Wherever feasible, and where NI tools are relatively new and untested, such monitoring should avoid wasted effort and ensure progress and refinement of methodology and practice over time. Finally, we propose institutional changes that would promote greater adoption of research and development monitoring to increase the evidence base for NI implementation at larger scales.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles B van Rees
- Odum School of Ecology & River Basin Center, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
| | - Laura Naslund
- Odum School of Ecology & River Basin Center, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States
| | - Darixa D Hernandez-Abrams
- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center. Vicksburg, MS, United States
| | - S Kyle McKay
- Odum School of Ecology & River Basin Center, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States
| | - C Brock Woodson
- School of Environmental, Civil, Agricultural, and Mechanical Engineering, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States
| | - Amy Rosemond
- Odum School of Ecology & River Basin Center, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States
| | - Brian McFall
- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center. Vicksburg, MS, United States
| | - Safra Altman
- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center. Vicksburg, MS, United States
| | - Seth J Wenger
- Odum School of Ecology & River Basin Center, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
Nature-based solutions (NBS) are an innovative concept that mimics the processes of natural ecosystems, popularized principally in the European Union. With a substantial body of literature amassed since the term’s inception in 2015, there is a need to systematically review existing literature to identify overarching gaps and trends, according to disciplinary focus, geographic scope, and key themes, and direct future research inquiry and policy recommendations. This review consists of bibliometric analysis and thematic analysis for NBS studies in urbanism. NBS studies were found to relate strongly with other concepts of ‘Ecosystem Services’, ‘Green Infrastructure’, ‘Climate Change’, and ‘Risk management and Resilience’, which align with four major thematic goals set by the European Commission. Within NBS scholarship, various sub-themes have emerged, namely, ‘Greening’, ‘Urban Development’, ‘Water’, ‘Wellbeing’, and ‘Governance’. Furthermore, we illustrate that the amount and thematic focus of NBS research have been unevenly distributed worldwide. Analysis of emerging trends shows a recent increase in topics, such as adaptive governance of NBS, and the incorporation of social justice in sustainability transitions. Based on an assessment of extant NBS literature, we offer some recommendations for the future direction of the research fields.
Collapse
|
3
|
The Ecosystem Resilience Concept Applied to Hydrogeological Systems: A General Approach. WATER 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/w12061824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
We have witnessed the great changes that hydrogeological systems are facing in the last decades: rivers that have dried up; wetlands that have disappeared, leaving their buckets converted into farmland; and aquifers that have been intensively exploited for years, among others. Humans have caused the most part of these results that can be worsened by climate change, with delayed effects on groundwater quantity and quality. The consequences are negatively impacting ecosystems and dependent societies. The concept of resilience has not been extensively used in the hydrogeological research, and it can be a very useful concept that can improve the understanding and management of these systems. The aim of this work is to briefly discuss the role of resilience in the context of freshwater systems affected by either climate or anthropic actions as a way to increase our understanding of how anticipating negative changes (transitions) may contribute to improving the management of the system and preserving the services that it provides. First, the article presents the basic concepts applied to hydrogeological systems from the ecosystem’s resilience approach. Second, the factors controlling for hydrogeological systems’ responses to different impacts are commented upon. Third, a case study is analyzed and discussed. Finally, the useful implications of the concept are discussed.
Collapse
|