1
|
Guo R, Torrejon VM, Reynolds C, Fayad R, Pickering J, Devine R, Rees D, Greenwood S, Kandemir C, Fisher LHC, White A, Quested T, Koh LSC. Assessing the environmental sustainability of consumer-centric poultry chain in the UK through life cycle approaches and the household simulation model. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2024; 929:172634. [PMID: 38643883 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024]
Abstract
Chicken fillets, predominantly encased in disposable plastic packaging, represent a common perishable commodity frequently found in the shopping baskets of British consumers, with an annual slaughter exceeding 1.1 billion chickens. The associated environmental implications are of considerable significance. However, a noticeable gap exists concerning the household-level ramifications of chicken meat consumption, which remains a prominent driver (165 kg CO2eyr-1 per capita) of environmental impacts in the United Kingdom (UK). This study's primary objective is to integrate Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology with insights derived from a spectrum of interventions simulated within the Household Simulation Model (HHSM). The interventions that are simulated are influenced by various consumer behaviours related to the purchase, consumption, storage and disposal of chicken fillets. The overarching aim is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the environmental consequences associated with each intervention. The research encompasses eight distinct household archetypes and the UK average, with a focus on discerning differences in their environmental influence. The introduction of shelf-life extension measures leads to a reduction in the overall environmental impacts (in μPt), with reductions ranging from 1 % to 18 %. Concurrently, waste treatment's environmental burdens can be curtailed by 9 % to 69 % for the UK average. Of the 12 interventions tested, the intervention that combines a one-day extension in the shelf life of open packs and a three-day extension for unopened packs leads to the greatest reduction in environmental impacts, at 18 % for the entire process and 69 % for the waste treatment. This intervention is estimated to yield annual reductions of 130,722 t of CO2 emissions across the entire process and 34,720 t of CO2 emissions from waste treatment, as compared to the default scenario. These findings demonstrate the importance of integrating consumer behaviour, food waste, and packaging considerations within the domain of food LCA research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Guo
- Management School, Advanced Resource Efficiency Centre and Energy Institute, The University of Sheffield, UK
| | | | | | - Ramzi Fayad
- Management School, Advanced Resource Efficiency Centre and Energy Institute, The University of Sheffield, UK
| | - Jack Pickering
- Management School, Advanced Resource Efficiency Centre and Energy Institute, The University of Sheffield, UK
| | - Rachel Devine
- WRAP, Blenheim Court, 19 George Street, Banbury OX16 5BH, UK
| | - Deborah Rees
- Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, UK
| | - Sarah Greenwood
- Grantham Centre for Sustainable Futures, The University of Sheffield, UK
| | - Cansu Kandemir
- Advanced Manufacturing Research Centre, The University of Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Adrian White
- Centre for Food Policy; City, University of London, UK
| | - Tom Quested
- WRAP, Blenheim Court, 19 George Street, Banbury OX16 5BH, UK
| | - Lenny S C Koh
- Management School, Advanced Resource Efficiency Centre and Energy Institute, The University of Sheffield, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Renison D, Jaacks G, Pollice J, Herrero ML. Forest restoration under leaf‐cutting ant pressure: Improved sapling survival in non‐foraged sites away from ant nests or within plastic tree shelters. Restor Ecol 2022. [DOI: 10.1111/rec.13723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Renison
- Centro de Ecología y Recursos Naturales Renovables, Dr. Ricardo Luti, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Av. Vélez Sarsfield 1611 X5016GCA Córdoba Argentina
- Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas y Tecnológicas. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba ‐ CONICET. Av. Vélez Sarsfield 1611 X5016GCA Córdoba Argentina
| | - Germán Jaacks
- Intendencia del Parque Nacional Quebrada del Condorito, Av. J.S. Bach N°504, B° Costa Azul, 5152 Villa Carlos Paz Córdoba Argentina
| | - Julieta Pollice
- Centro de Ecología y Recursos Naturales Renovables, Dr. Ricardo Luti, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Av. Vélez Sarsfield 1611 X5016GCA Córdoba Argentina
| | - María Lucrecia Herrero
- Centro de Ecología y Recursos Naturales Renovables, Dr. Ricardo Luti, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Av. Vélez Sarsfield 1611 X5016GCA Córdoba Argentina
- Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba ‐ CONICET. Av. Vélez Sarsfield 1611 X5016GCA Córdoba Argentina
| |
Collapse
|