1
|
Li J, Li X, Li Y, Liu H, Wang Q. Artificial sweeteners in wastewater treatment plants: A systematic review of global occurrence, distribution, removal, and degradation pathways. JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 2025; 494:138644. [PMID: 40393290 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.138644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2025] [Revised: 05/02/2025] [Accepted: 05/15/2025] [Indexed: 05/22/2025]
Abstract
The widespread use of artificial sweeteners in foods, drinks, and pharmaceuticals has led to rising concentrations in wastewater, with specific sweeteners raising concerns due to demonstrated toxicological risks to ecosystems and humans. To date, a comprehensive summary of the occurrence, distribution, and removal status of artificial sweeteners in wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) is lacking, making it difficult to evaluate the associated risks and environmental impacts. We conducted a systematic review of scientific literature and grey literature with rigorous screening covering 24 countries and 6 continents. Globally, sucralose, acesulfame, saccharin, and cyclamate are prevalent artificial sweeteners in WWTP, with concentrations of 0.6-303.0 µg/L in influent and 0.1-81.2 µg/L in effluent. Sucralose showed obvious increasing concentrations over time in wastewater in the United States and Canada, with an increase of 5.6-5.7 µg/L·y in influent and 4.7-5.5 µg/L·y in effluent. Summer wastewater usually contains 11.1-33.3 % higher concentrations of artificial sweeteners than other seasons. Saccharin and cyclamate are the most easily removable sweeteners (>90.0 % removal) in WWTP, followed by acesulfame (25.0-70.1 %) and sucralose (-10.0-10.0 %). Wastewater treatment processes with longer HRT and more diverse microbial communities showed better performance in sucralose removal, while processes with aerobic conditions showed better performance in acesulfame and saccharin removal than anaerobic processes. Increasing trends for persistent sucralose and acesulfame removal have been observed globally, suggesting potential microbial evolution/adaptation. This review contributes to a comprehensive understanding of the spatiotemporal distribution and ever-evolving biodegradation of artificial sweeteners in WWTP, providing future perspectives and potential policy requirements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jibin Li
- Centre for Technology in Water and Wastewater, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
| | - Xuan Li
- Centre for Technology in Water and Wastewater, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia.
| | - Yi Li
- Centre for Technology in Water and Wastewater, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
| | - Huan Liu
- Centre for Technology in Water and Wastewater, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
| | - Qilin Wang
- Centre for Technology in Water and Wastewater, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Krüger R, Watzl B, Merz B. Urinary excretion of low- and no-calorie sweeteners (LNCS) and associated food sources, as observed in the German cross-sectional KarMeN-study. Eur J Nutr 2025; 64:136. [PMID: 40126691 PMCID: PMC11933190 DOI: 10.1007/s00394-025-03644-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2025] [Indexed: 03/26/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to quantify urinary excretion of LNCS (Low- and No-Calorie Sweeteners) and to identify LNCS-associated food consumption in Germany, with special emphasis on exposure to combinations of different LNCS. METHODS UPLC-MS/MS was used to quantify LNCS metabolites in 24-hour urine samples of 301 participants from the cross-sectional KarMeN (Karlsruhe Metabolomics and Nutrition) study. Dietary data were assessed via 24 h recall. Spearman rank correlation analysis and multiple linear regression models were used to investigate food groups that contribute to LNCS exposure. RESULTS Based on the number of samples with quantifiable urinary concentrations and the absolute excretion within a day, cyclamate (88% of samples), saccharin (44%), acesulfame (35%), and aspartame (32%) were most commonly consumed. The consumption of specific food groups, such as table sweeteners, light soft drinks, Radler, protein shakes, and stevia sweeteners, accounted for significant variations in urinary concentrations. Specific combinations of LNCS were observed for these food groups, as well as a considerable exploitation of LNCS-specific ADI (acceptable daily intake). CONCLUSION Individuals who consume high amounts of specific LNCS-containing, processed foods are exposed to a notable mix of various LNCS. Since data on associations between mixed LNCS exposure and health are lacking, it is an urgent issue to evaluate the potential risks of consuming combinations of diverse LNCS rather than conducting risk assessments of single LNCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralf Krüger
- Max Rubner-Institut, Department of Physiology and Biochemistry of Nutrition, Haid-und-Neu-Str. 9, D-76131, Karlsruhe, Germany.
| | - Bernhard Watzl
- Max Rubner-Institut, Department of Physiology and Biochemistry of Nutrition, Haid-und-Neu-Str. 9, D-76131, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Benedikt Merz
- Max Rubner-Institut, Department of Physiology and Biochemistry of Nutrition, Haid-und-Neu-Str. 9, D-76131, Karlsruhe, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li D, Xing Y, Li L, Yao Y, Li Y, Zhu H, Du P, Wang F, Yu D, Yang F, Yao Z, Thomas KV. Accumulation, translocation and transformation of artificial sweeteners in plants: A critical review. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION (BARKING, ESSEX : 1987) 2025; 366:125517. [PMID: 39667574 DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.125517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2024] [Revised: 12/05/2024] [Accepted: 12/09/2024] [Indexed: 12/14/2024]
Abstract
Artificial sweeteners (ASs) have become an increasingly significant concern as an emerging contaminant. The widespread utilization has given rise to environmental consequences that are progressively harder to disregard. ASs infiltrate both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems through the discharge of wastewater effluents and the application of manure and biosolids. These compounds can be absorbed and accumulated by plants from soil, water and the atmosphere, posing potential risks to ecological systems and human health. However, limited data available on plant absorption, translocation, and metabolism of ASs hinders a comprehensive understanding of their impact on ecosystem. This study aims to comprehensively summarize the global distribution of ASs, along with elucidating patterns of their uptake and accumulation within plants. Furthermore, it seeks to elucidate the pivotal factors governing ASs absorption and translocation, encompassing hydrophilicity, ionic nature, plant physiology, and environmental conditions. Notably, there remains a significant knowledge gap in understanding the biodegradation of ASs within plants, with their specific degradation pathways and mechanisms largely unexplored, thereby necessitating further investigation. Additionally, this review provides valuable insights into the ecotoxicological effects of ASs on plants. Finally, it identifies research gaps and outlines potential avenues for future research, offering a forward-looking perspective on this critical issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dandan Li
- State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Food Chain Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing, 100048, China.
| | - Yeye Xing
- State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Food Chain Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing, 100048, China
| | - Li Li
- School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Reno, 1664 N. Virginia Street, Reno, NV, 89557-0274, USA
| | - Yiming Yao
- MOE Key Laboratory of Pollution Processes and Environmental Criteria, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300350, China
| | - Yongcheng Li
- School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Reno, 1664 N. Virginia Street, Reno, NV, 89557-0274, USA
| | - Hongkai Zhu
- MOE Key Laboratory of Pollution Processes and Environmental Criteria, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300350, China
| | - Peng Du
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Urban Hydrological Cycle and Sponge City Technology, College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
| | - Fang Wang
- State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Food Chain Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing, 100048, China
| | - Dayang Yu
- State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Food Chain Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing, 100048, China
| | - Fang Yang
- College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, China
| | - Zhiliang Yao
- State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Food Chain Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing, 100048, China.
| | - Kevin V Thomas
- Queensland Alliance for Environmental Health Sciences (QAEHS), The University of Queensland, 20 Cornwall Street, Woolloongabba, 4102, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF), Castle L, Andreassen M, Aquilina G, Bastos ML, Boon P, Fallico B, FitzGerald R, Frutos Fernandez MJ, Grasl‐Kraupp B, Gundert‐Remy U, Gürtler R, Houdeau E, Kurek M, Louro H, Morales P, Passamonti S, Batke M, Bruzell E, Chipman J, Cheyns K, Crebelli R, Fortes C, Fürst P, Halldorsson T, LeBlanc J, Mirat M, Lindtner O, Mortensen A, Ntzani E, Shah R, Wallace H, Wright M, Barmaz S, Civitella C, Georgelova P, Lodi F, Mazzoli E, Rasinger J, Maria Rincon A, Tard A, Zakidou P, Younes M. Re-evaluation of saccharin and its sodium, potassium and calcium salts (E 954) as food additives. EFSA J 2024; 22:e9044. [PMID: 39553702 PMCID: PMC11565076 DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2024] Open
Abstract
This opinion deals with the re-evaluation of saccharin and its sodium, potassium and calcium salts (E 954) as food additives. Saccharin is the chemically manufactured compound 1,2-benzisothiazol-3(2H)-one-1,1-dioxide. Along with its sodium (Na), potassium (K) and calcium (Ca) salts, they are authorised as sweeteners (E 954). E 954 can be produced by two manufacturing methods i.e. Remsen-Fahlberg and Maumee. No analytical data on potential impurities were provided for products manufactured with the Maumee process; therefore, the Panel could only evaluate saccharins (E 954) manufactured with the Remsen-Fahlberg process. The Panel concluded that the newly available studies do not raise a concern for genotoxicity of E 954 and the saccharins impurities associated with the Remsen-Fahlberg manufacturing process. For the potential impurities associated with the Maumee process, a concern for genotoxicity was identified. The data set evaluated consisted of animals and human studies. The Panel considered appropriate to set a numerical acceptable daily intake (ADI) and considered the decrease in body weight in animal studies as the relevant endpoint for the derivation of a reference point. An ADI of 9 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day, expressed as free imide, was derived for saccharins (E 954). This ADI replaces the ADI of 5 mg /kg bw per day (expressed as sodium saccharin, corresponding to 3.8 mg /kg bw per day saccharin as free imide) established by the Scientific Committee on Food. The Panel considered the refined brand-loyal exposure assessment scenario the most appropriate exposure scenario for the risk assessment. The Panel noted that the P95 exposure estimates for chronic exposure to saccharins (E 954) were below the ADI. The Panel recommended the European Commission to consider the revision of the EU specifications of saccharin and its sodium, potassium and calcium salts (E 954).
Collapse
|
5
|
Qiao S, Huang W, Kuzma D, Kormendi A. Acesulfame and other artificial sweeteners in a wastewater treatment plant in Alberta, Canada: Occurrence, degradation, and emission. CHEMOSPHERE 2024; 356:141893. [PMID: 38582168 DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.141893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024]
Abstract
Acesulfame (ACE), sucralose (SUC), cyclamate (CYC), and saccharin (SAC) are widely used artificial sweeteners that undergo negligible metabolism in the human body, and thus ubiquitously exist in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). Due to their persistence in WWTPs, ACE and SUC are found in natural waters globally. Wastewater samples were collected from the primary influent, primary effluent, secondary effluent, and final effluent of a WWTP in Alberta, Canada between August 2022 and February 2023, and the artificial sweeteners concentrations were measured by LC-MS/MS. Using wastewater-based epidemiology, the daily per capita consumption of ACE in the studied wastewater treatment plant catchment was estimated to be the highest in the world. Similar to other studies, the removal efficiency in WWTP was high for SAC and CYC, but low or even negative for SUC. However, ACE removal remained surprisingly high (>96%), even in the cold Canadian winter months. This result may indicate a further adaptation of microorganisms capable of biodegrading ACE in WWTP. The estimated per capita discharge into the environment of ACE, CYC, and SAC is low in Alberta due to the prevalent utilization of secondary treatment throughout the province, but is 17.4-18.8 times higher in Canada, since only 70.3% of total discharged wastewater in Canada undergoes secondary treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuang Qiao
- Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Wendy Huang
- Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada.
| | - Darina Kuzma
- Advancing Canadian Water Assets, University of Calgary, 3131 210 Ave SE, Calgary, Alberta, T0L 0X0, Canada
| | - Aleshia Kormendi
- Advancing Canadian Water Assets, University of Calgary, 3131 210 Ave SE, Calgary, Alberta, T0L 0X0, Canada
| |
Collapse
|