Efficacy and safety of levetiracetam in infants and young children with refractory epilepsy

Effect of Levetiracetam Usage on Serum Creatine Phosphokinase Concentration in Patients with Epilepsy

Background:

Levetiracetam (LEV) is a widely used antiepileptic drug (AED) in the treatment of various type of seizures, including generalized epileptic seizure as well as focal seizures, and it is generally well tolerated. Common side effects of LEV are somnolence, asthenia, dizziness, mood changes, kidney dysfunction, minor infections, and thrombocytopenia. Recently, increased creatine phosphokinase (CPK) concentration or rhabdomyolysis after LEV administration has been reported. The goal of the study was to evaluate clinical risk factors associated with increased CPK concentration or rhabdomyolysis in LEV administration.

Materials and Methods:

One hundred and sixty children were enrolled. The risk factors were retrospectively analyzed.

Results:

Among the 160 patients, 84 (52.5%) were boys and 76 (47.5%) were girls, and the mean age was 85.95 ± 49.03 months (9–188 months). Of the 160 patients, 66 (41.3%) were treated with monotherapy, and 94 (58.8%) with polytherapy. We detected increased CPK concentration or rhabdomyolysis in three patients (1.9%). The CPK values of these three patients were 943, 1504, and 5046, respectively. No significant differences were observed in the serum CPK concentration between the patients treated with LEV.

Conclusion:

We detected that LEV may cause increased CPK concentration or rhabdomyolysis. When treating patients with LEV, clinicians should closely monitor serum CPK level. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study of elevated CPK concentration or rhabdomyolysis associated with LEV therapy in children.

Comparative Effectiveness of Levetiracetam vs Phenobarbital for Infantile Epilepsy

IMPORTANCE

More than half of infants with new-onset epilepsy have electroencephalographic and clinical features that do not conform to known electroclinical syndromes (ie, nonsyndromic epilepsy). Levetiracetam and phenobarbital are the most commonly prescribed medications for epilepsy in infants, but their comparative effectiveness is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of levetiracetam vs phenobarbital for nonsyndromic infantile epilepsy.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The Early Life Epilepsy Study-a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study conducted from March 1, 2012, to April 30, 2015, in 17 US medical centers-enrolled infants with nonsyndromic epilepsy and a first afebrile seizure between 1 month and 1 year of age.

EXPOSURES

Use of levetiracetam or phenobarbital as initial monotherapy within 1 year of the first seizure.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The binary outcome was freedom from monotherapy failure at 6 months, defined as no second prescribed antiepileptic medication and freedom from seizures beginning within 3 months of initiation of treatment. Outcomes were adjusted for demographics, epilepsy characteristics, and neurologic history, as well as for observable selection bias using propensity score weighting and for within-center correlation using generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

Of the 155 infants in the study (81 girls and 74 boys; median age, 4.7 months [interquartile range, 3.0-7.1 months]), those treated with levetiracetam (n = 117) were older at the time of the first seizure than those treated with phenobarbital (n = 38) (median age, 5.2 months [interquartile range, 3.5-8.2 months] vs 3.0 months [interquartile range, 2.0-4.4 months]; P < .001). There were no other significant bivariate differences. Infants treated with levetiracetam were free from monotherapy failure more often than those treated with phenobarbital (47 [40.2%] vs 6 [15.8%]; P = .01). The superiority of levetiracetam over phenobarbital persisted after adjusting for covariates, observable selection bias, and within-center correlation (odds ratio, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.1-16; number needed to treat, 3.5 [95% CI, 1.7-60]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Levetiracetam may have superior effectiveness compared with phenobarbital for initial monotherapy of nonsyndromic epilepsy in infants. If 100 infants who received phenobarbital were instead treated with levetiracetam, 44 would be free from monotherapy failure instead of 16 by the estimates in this study. Randomized clinical trials are necessary to confirm these findings.

Determination of plasma Levetiracetam level by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) and its application in pharmacokinetics studies in neonates

BACKGROUND

Levetiracetam (LEV) is an antiepileptic drug which has good safety and efficacy in neonatal seizure (NS), a common incident in neonates with weight <1500 g. The pharmacokinetics for LEV in neonatal populations is yet to be clearly understood. In this study, we developed and validated a method for determination of LEV in plasma by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry for the purpose of pharmacokinetic study.

METHODS

Plasma LEV was spiked with Lamivudine as internal standard before extraction by C18 solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridge. Chromatography was performed using isocratic elution with mobile phase A: B (10: 90) for 2.0 min with flow rate 0.4 mL/min. The mobile phase was composed of 0.1% formic acid in 10.0 mM ammonium acetate (A) and 100% methanol (B). The injection volume was 1.0 μL and the total run time was 2.0 min. Multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) with electro spray in positive mode was used. The mass transition for LEV was 171.2/126.0 and 230.0/112.0 for IS with retention time of 0.73 and 0.72 min, respectively.

RESULTS

A calibration curve range from 0.50-80.0 μg/mL was obtained with a correlation coefficient >0.99 in the quadratic model. Precision and accuracy was within the acceptable range and the intra- and inter-day %CV for three concentrations of QCs were <10%.

CONCLUSION

This method was reliable, accurate and applicable for LEV pharmacokinetic study in neonates with seizure.

A multicentre randomised controlled trial of levetiracetam versus phenytoin for convulsive status epilepticus in children (protocol): Convulsive Status Epilepticus Paediatric Trial (ConSEPT) - a PREDICT study

Background

Convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) is the most common life-threatening childhood neurological emergency. Despite this, there is a lack of high quality evidence supporting medication use after first line benzodiazepines, with current treatment protocols based solely on non-experimental evidence and expert opinion. The current standard of care, phenytoin, is only 60% effective, and associated with considerable adverse effects. A newer anti-convulsant, levetiracetam, can be given faster, is potentially more efficacious, with a more tolerable side effect profile. The primary aim of the study presented in this protocol is to determine whether intravenous (IV) levetiracetam or IV phenytoin is the better second line treatment for the emergency management of CSE in children.

Methods/Design

200 children aged between 3 months and 16 years presenting to 13 emergency departments in Australia and New Zealand with CSE, that has failed to stop with first line benzodiazepines, will be enrolled into this multicentre open randomised controlled trial. Participants will be randomised to 40 mg/kg IV levetiracetam infusion over 5 min or 20 mg/kg IV phenytoin infusion over 20 min. The primary outcome for the study is clinical cessation of seizure activity five minutes following the completion of the infusion of the study medication. Blinded confirmation of the primary outcome will occur with the primary outcome assessment being video recorded and assessed by a primary outcome assessment team blinded to treatment allocation. Secondary outcomes include: Clinical cessation of seizure activity at two hours; Time to clinical seizure cessation; Need for rapid sequence induction; Intensive care unit (ICU) admission; Serious adverse events; Length of Hospital/ICU stay; Health care costs; Seizure status/death at one-month post discharge.

Discussion

This paper presents the background, rationale, and design for a randomised controlled trial comparing levetiracetam to phenytoin in children presenting with CSE in whom benzodiazepines have failed. This study will provide the first high quality evidence for management of paediatric CSE post first-line benzodiazepines.

Trial registration

Prospectively registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12615000129583 (11/2/2015). UTN U1111–1144-5272. ConSEPT protocol version 4 (12/12/2014).

Safety of levetiracetam among infants younger than 12 months--Results from a European multicenter observational study

BACKGROUND

There are limited data on the use of the antiepileptic drug (AED) levetiracetam for the treatment of infants.

AIM

To prospectively evaluate the safety of levetiracetam oral solution and its impact on epilepsy severity in infants with different seizure types.

METHODS

This noninterventional post-authorization safety study included patients 1-11 months of age. Patients' treatment - levetiracetam dose, and addition, withdrawal or changes in the doses of concomitant medications and AEDs - was at the discretion of the physician. The primary variable was treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

RESULTS

Of 101 infants, 75 completed and 26 discontinued the study. Mean age was 6.0 months, 50 were male, most (80%) took 1 ≥ concomitant AED and had cryptogenic or symptomatic epilepsy that was focal (38.6%) or generalized (20.8%), particularly frontal lobe epilepsy (20.0%) or West syndrome/infantile spasms (20.0%). Among known aetiologies, congenital factors (22.8%) such as dysplastic lesions or perinatal events (17.8%) were predominant. Overall, 54.5% of patients had ≥ 1 TEAE. Five patients experienced drug-related TEAEs - convulsion, irritability, somnolence and hypotonia, all listed in the product label, with the exception of hypotonia, which was reported for one patient and resolved without any change in study medication. Seven patients discontinued due to TEAEs, mainly due to infantile spasms and respiratory disorders. At study end, 71.8% of patients showed improvement in epilepsy severity, 18.8% remained stable and 9.4% showed worsening. Levetiracetam did not appear to have a negative effect on growth parameters.

CONCLUSION

In this prospective study, which included the largest number of patients in this age range so far, levetiracetam was found to be well tolerated and efficacious for the treatment of infants with epilepsy.

Synaptic vesicle protein2A decreases in amygdaloid-kindling pharmcoresistant epileptic rats

Synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A) involvement has been reported in the animal models of epilepsy and in human intractable epilepsy. The difference between pharmacosensitive epilepsy and pharmacoresistant epilepsy remains poorly understood. The present study aimed to observe the hippocampus SV2A protein expression in amygdale-kindling pharmacoresistant epileptic rats. The pharmacosensitive epileptic rats served as control. Amygdaloid-kindling model of epilepsy was established in 100 healthy adult male Sprague-Dawley rats. The kindled rat model of epilepsy was used to select pharmacoresistance by testing their seizure response to phenytoin and phenobarbital. The selected pharmacoresistant rats were assigned to a pharmacoresistant epileptic group (PRE group). Another 12 pharmacosensitive epileptic rats (PSE group) served as control. Immunohistochemistry, real-time PCR and Western blotting were used to determine SV2A expression in the hippocampus tissue samples from both the PRE and the PSE rats. Immunohistochemistry staining showed that SV2A was mainly accumulated in the cytoplasm of the neurons, as well as along their dendrites throughout all subfields of the hippocampus. Immunoreactive staining level of SV2A-positive cells was 0.483 ± 0.304 in the PRE group and 0.866 ± 0.090 in the PSE group (P < 0.05). Real-time PCR analysis demonstrated that 2(-ΔΔCt) value of SV2A mRNA was 0.30 ± 0.43 in the PRE group and 0.76 ± 0.18 in the PSE group (P < 0.05). Western blotting analysis obtained the similar findings (0.27 ± 0.21 versus 1.12 ± 0.21, P < 0.05). PRE rats displayed a significant decrease of SV2A in the brain. SV2A may be associated with the pathogenesis of intractable epilepsy of the amygdaloid-kindling rats.

Levetiracetam in neonatal seizures: a review

Phenobarbital and phenytoin have been the mainstay treatment modalities for neonatal seizures. Studies have revealed these agents control seizures in less than half of neonates, can cause neuronal apoptosis in vitro, and have highly variable pharmacokinetics in neonates. In contrast, there have been no reports of levetiracetam causing these neurotoxic effects. Due to its favorable side effect and pharmacokinetic profiles and positive efficacy outcomes in neonatal studies to date, there is great interest in the use of levetiracetam for neonatal seizures. This article reviews the literature regarding the safety of levetiracetam in neonates and its efficacy in neonatal seizures.

Efficacy and safety of IV levetiracetam in children with acute repetitive seizures

BACKGROUND

Levetiracetam has been proven to be effective in both partial and generalized seizures in children. However, few studies have reported its efficacy in the treatment of acute repetitive seizures. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam in children with acute repetitive seizures.

METHODS

The medical records of children from the age of 1 month-18 years who received levetiracetam because of acute repetitive seizures in the pediatric intensive care unit between 2010 and 2013 were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Of the 133 patients, levetiracetam terminated seizures in 104 (78.2%). Side effects such as agitation and aggression were observed in three patients (2.2%). The likelihood of treatment failure was increased by four times by younger age at seizure onset; by six times in the individuals with neurological abnormalities; and by 22 times in the patients with West syndrome. The patients who used levetiracetam as the first treatment option for acute repetitive seizures had a longer duration of epilepsy, a higher rate of neurological abnormality, and a higher proportion of medically resistant epilepsy compared with the individuals who used levetiracetam as an add-on treatment to the other intravenous antiepileptic drugs. However, no differences were detected between these two groups in terms of treatment response.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous levetiracetam appears to be effective and safe in the treatment of acute repetitive seizures. Randomized clinical trials are needed to determine whether intravenous levetiracetam may replace other antiepileptic drugs as the first-line therapy in the management of acute repetitive seizures.

Continuation rates of levetiracetam in children from the EULEVp cohort study

BACKGROUND

Since indication extension to children data regarding the effectiveness of levetiracetam in paediatric patients remains limited.

AIMS

Investigate the real-life effectiveness of levetiracetam in paediatric patients.

METHODS

Epileptic children (<16 years) who had initiated levetiracetam between 1 October 2006 and 31 March 2007 were included and followed for 1 year by hospital or non-hospital neurologists practising in France.

RESULTS

Among the 156 identified children, 147 were analysed: 51.7% were female, and mean (SD) age was 9.2 years (4.2). Most patients had either partial symptomatic (30.6%) or partial cryptogenic (26.5%) epilepsy, 92.5% experienced seizures during the 6 months preceding levetiracetam initiation, and 19.2% were on levetiracetam alone at initiation. One-year levetiracetam continuation rate was estimated to be 72.0% (95%CI [63.8; 78.6]). Of the 104 children continuing levetiracetam treatment at end of study, 31.7% were seizure-free during the last six months of follow-up, and 23.1% on levetiracetam alone. Discontinuation of levetiracetam (n = 41) was mainly for insufficient efficacy (58.5% of those concerned).

CONCLUSIONS

In real-life clinical practice important treatment retention and non-negligible reduction of seizure frequency may be expected.

Levetiracetam in children, adolescents and young adults with intractable epilepsy: efficacy, tolerability and effect on electroencephalogram--a pilot study

Levetiracetam has been authorized for use in Israel as an add-on therapy for intractable epilepsy since May 2006. The aim of the present study was to document its effectiveness for this indication in children, adolescents, and young adults. The medical files of 78 patients aged 0.5-39 years (mean, 14.2 years) treated at our center for intractable epilepsy were reviewed. All received levetiracetam as add-on therapy following a failure to respond to at least 3 anti-epileptic drugs. Fifty-two patients (67%) had partial epilepsy and the remainder had primary generalized epilepsy. The epilepsy was symptomatic in 57%, cryptogenic in 27%, and idiopathic in 15%. Average age at first seizure was 4.1 years. In 45% of patients, the number of seizures was reduced by half with levetiracetam treatment; 11.5% of the cohort achieved complete remission. There was a statistically significant correlation between clinical seizure control and improvement in the electroencephalography findings (p = 0.0012). The drug was well tolerated, with a retention rate of 69% after one year. The most common adverse effects were irritability and impulsiveness, in 26.9% of patients. Severe behavioral side effects (psychosis, confusion) were experienced by 6.4%. In conclusion, levetiracetam is an effective and tolerable add-on agent for use in most epileptic children, adolescents, and young adults who fail to respond to at least 3 antiepileptic drugs and should be the treatment of choice in this setting. Despite the relatively high rate of behavioral side effects in this study, the retention rate at one year was high.

Antiepileptic effects of levetiracetam in a rodent neonatal seizure model

BACKGROUND

Neonatal seizures can result in chronic epilepsy and long-term behavioral and cognitive deficits. Levetiracetam (LEV), an antiepileptic drug that binds to the synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A), has been increasingly used off-label for the therapy of neonatal seizures. Preclinical data regarding the acute or long-term efficacy of LEV are lacking.

METHODS

We tested the anticonvulsant efficacy of LEV in a rat model of hypoxia-induced neonatal seizures. In addition, we evaluated the protective effects of postnatal day (P)10 LEV treatment on later-life kainic acid (KA)-induced seizure susceptibility and seizure-induced neuronal injury. Western blot and immunohistochemistry were used to assess the developmental regulation of SV2A in the rat and human brain.

RESULTS

LEV pretreatment at P10 significantly decreased the cumulative duration of behavioral and electrographic seizures at both 25 and 50 mg/kg. At P40, KA-induced seizures and neuronal loss were significantly diminished in rats previously treated with LEV. LEV target SV2A is present in both neonatal rat and human brain and increases steadily to adulthood.

CONCLUSION

LEV suppressed acute seizures induced by perinatal hypoxia and diminished later-life seizure susceptibility and seizure-induced neuronal injury, providing evidence for disease modification. These results support consideration of a clinical trial of LEV in neonatal seizures.

Safety and efficacy of levetiracetam for the treatment of partial onset seizures in children from one month of age

Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder in the pediatric population, affecting up to one percent of children, and for which the mainstay of treatment is anticonvulsant medication. Despite the frequent use of anticonvulsant drugs, remarkably little is known about the safety and efficacy of most of these medications in the pediatric epilepsy population. Of 34 anticonvulsants currently approved for use by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), only 13 have been approved for use in children. Although infants and young children are disproportionately affected by epilepsy, there are currently only three anticonvulsant medications that have been specifically evaluated and approved for use in children younger than 2 years of age. In 2012, the FDA approved levetiracetam as an adjunctive treatment for partial onset seizures in infants and children from one month of age. Here we review the available data on levetiracetam in the pediatric epilepsy population. We first discuss the pharmacological profile of levetiracetam, including its mechanism of action, formulations and dosing, and pharmacokinetics in children. We then review the available efficacy, safety, and tolerability data in children from one month of age with partial onset seizures. We conclude that the current data leading to the approval of levetiracetam for use in infants and children with partial onset seizures is encouraging, although more work needs to be done before definitive conclusions can be drawn about the efficacy of levetiracetam across different pediatric age groups.

The efficacy and side effects of levetiracetam on refractory epilepsy in children

Objective:

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam (LEV) add-on therapy in children with refractory epilepsy.

Materials and Methods:

We evaluated 102 children (56 boys, 46 girls, mean age 96.00 ± 31.15 months) with refractory epilepsy. Patients received LEV as add-on therapy. Changes in seizure frequency and adverse events were observed. Follow-up was conducted at least 6 months after treatment.

Results:

In total, 46 (45.1%) of the 102 children achieved more than 50% seizure frequency reduction, and 16 (15.6%) of these were seizure free. LEV reduced seizure frequency by at least 50% in 58.3% of patients with partial seizures, in 32.0% of patients with primary generalized seizures, and in 17.6% of patients with both partial and generalized seizures.

Conclusion:

Our results confirm that LEV, as add-on therapy, was effective in reducing seizure frequency in a variety of seizure types but seems most effective for partial-onset seizures. LEV was also well-tolerated in children.

Pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam in neonates with seizures

The pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam were determined prospectively in 18 neonates with seizures. Neonates were found to have lower clearance, higher volume of distribution, and a longer half-life as compared with older children and adults. Mild somnolence was the only adverse effect.

Efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam in children with epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam (Lev) in children with epilepsy.

METHODS

Open-label observational, prospective, single arm, non-interventional study examining patients (≤14 years) with epilepsy, receiving mono- or combination therapy with levetiracetam. Levetiracetam was started at a dose of approximately 10mg/kg/day. The dose was titrated up with 10mg/kg increments if seizures were poorly controlled but the maximum daily dose could not be more than 60 mg/kg/day. Documented were seizure type and frequency, levetiracetam dose and side effects.

RESULTS

120 patients (39.3% females, mean age 4.5 ± 3.9 years) were enrolled. Average duration of follow-up was 10.3 ± 3.5 months. At study endpoint, 64.8% of patients got seizure free and 83.0% got a seizure reduction of ≥50%. Observed side effects were somnolence, dysphoria, nervousness, dystrophy, somnipathy, asitia, debilitation, etc. and the incidence rate in the study was 47.5%. Four (3.3%) of 120 patients withdrew because of intolerance of side effects. The estimated one year retention rate of levetiracetam was 73.3%. Poor effect was the most common reason for withdrawal.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, it seemed that levetiracetam was safe and effective for a wide range of epileptic seizures in children with epilepsy.

Levetiracetam: safety and efficacy in neonatal seizures

PURPOSE

Neonatal seizures are common, especially in prematurity. Phenobarbital (PB) currently represents the antiepileptic drug (AED) of choice, despite being related to increased neuronal apoptosis in animal models and cognitive impairment in human subjects. Levetiracetam (LEV) may have a more favorable profile since it does not cause neuronal apoptosis in infant rodents.

METHODS

In a prospective feasibility study, LEV was applied as first-line treatment in 38 newborns with EEG-confirmed seizures, after ruling out hypoglycemia, hypocalcaemia, hypomagnesaemia and pyridoxin dependency. Initial intravenous doses of 10 mg/kg LEV were gradually increased to 30 mg/kg over 3 days with a further titration to 45-60 mg/kg at the end of the week. Acute intervention with up to 2 intravenous doses of PB 20 mg/kg was tolerated during LEV titration. LEV was switched to oral as soon as the infants' condition allowed. Based on clinical observation, EEG tracings (aEEG/routine EEGs), and lab data, drug safety and anticonvulsant efficacy were assessed over 12 months.

RESULTS

In 19 newborns a single PB dose of 20 mg/kg was administered, while 3 newborns received 2 PB doses. 30 infants were seizure free under LEV at the end of the first week and 27 remained seizure free at four weeks, while EEGs markedly improved in 24 patients at 4 weeks. In 19 cases, LEV was discontinued after 2-4 weeks, while 7 infants received LEV up to 3 months. No severe adverse effects were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

These results illustrate the safety of LEV treatment in neonatal seizures, including prematurity and suggest LEV anticonvulsant efficacy. Additional PB treatment admittedly constitutes a methodological shortcoming due to the prolonged anticonvulsive efficacy of PB. Double blind prospective controlled studies and long-term evaluation of cognitive outcome are called for.

Intravenous levetiracetam in the management of acute seizures in children

Levetiracetam may be effective in children with acute seizures or status epilepticus. We performed a retrospective chart review of children who received intravenous levetiracetam within 30 minutes of a seizure. Seventy-three patients during a 2-year study period met our inclusion criteria. The mean (+/- S.D.) age and weight of the patients were 5.59 +/- 5.6 years (range, 1 day to 17.8 years) and 23.1 +/- 21 kg (range, 1.97-97 kg), respectively. Patients received a mean (+/- S.D.) levetiracetam dose of 29.4 +/- 13.5 mg/kg. Most children (n = 49, or 67%) received additional antiepileptic drugs to abort their seizure. Overall, the mean (+/- S.D.) total (abortive plus chronic) number of concomitant antiepileptic drugs used by the population was 2.53 +/- 1.7 (1.07 +/- 0.98 as additional abortive therapy, and 1.42 +/- 1.29 as chronic therapy). Most patients received levetiracetam for serial seizures (79%), whereas 12% and 8% manifested a single seizure or status epilepticus, respectively. Clinical effectiveness at 1, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after the initial levetiracetam dose constituted the primary study outcome. Eighty-nine percent of patients remained seizure-free at 1 hour. This rate decreased at each evaluation time point. Most patients (71%) were placed on maintenance levetiracetam within 24 hours of their loading dose. The predictive ability of patient and drug regimen variables in outcomes was poor. Only the number of concomitant antiepileptic drugs consistently predicted outcomes. Levetiracetam was well tolerated at the doses studied, and appears most effective in single seizure events.

Levetiracetam in childhood epilepsy

Levetiracetam is an antiepileptic drug that has been shown to be effective in various types of seizures, both partial and generalized. Although it is not yet well established because of the small number of studies, levetiracetam as both add-on therapy and monotherapy can be considered as an alternative to valproic acid in some pediatric patients. We have reviewed the available data on the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of levetiracetam in children with epilepsy. The efficacy of levetiracetam as an adjunctive therapy and as monotherapy for generalized and partial childhood epilepsies and for some types of specific epileptic syndromes of infancy and childhood (such as juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, benign rolandic epilepsy, and Jeavon syndrome) has been demonstrated in some studies. Moreover, levetiracetam may be a valuable option for children with refractory epilepsy. The reported tolerability of levetiracetam and its safety profile are favorable. Among the side effects reported, behavioral changes and even psychotic reactions seem to occur more frequently in younger patients (under 4 years of age). The onset of signs/symptoms usually occurs early, even during the titration phase, and, in many cases, at a low dosage (<20 mg/kg/day). These side effects were always observed to be reversible after discontinuation of levetiracetam. In conclusion, results from clinical trials to date suggest that levetiracetam has a full spectrum of efficacy as well as a favorable safety profile, and this drug can be considered a valuable option in the treatment of epilepsy in pediatric patients.

Efficacy and safety of levetiracetam as an add-on therapy in children aged less than 4 years with refractory epilepsy

In the past decade, most studies on levetiracetam were conducted on patients aged > or = 4 years of age. The authors sought to assess the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam as an adjunctive treatment of children <4 years of age with refractory epilepsy. The mean levetiracetam dosage used on the 24 patients in this study was 38.85 mg/kg per day, and the mean duration of treatment was 40 weeks. During the study, levetiracetam was tapered off in 2 patients due to seizure worsening and was discontinued in other 2 patients due to unacceptable adverse effects. Levetiracetam therapy was effective in 58.3% of patients, with 20.8% achieving seizure freedom. Eight patients showed no obvious response and the remaining 2 patients showed divergent responses. Although adverse effects were seen in 37.5% of patients, all adverse effects were tolerable or resolved with time or discontinuation. Therefore, the authors conclude that levetiracetam treatment is effective and safe in young children with refractory epilepsy.

Levetiracetam in the treatment of neonatal seizures: a pilot study

PURPOSE

At present, neonatal seizures are usually treated with Phenobarbital (PB) despite the limited efficacy and the potential risk this treatment holds for the developing brain. We report here a prospective pilot feasibility study on the use of Levetiracetam as monotherapy in the treatment of neonatal seizures.

METHODS

Six newborns (body weight>2000 g, gestational age>30 weeks) presenting with neonatal seizures were enrolled. Patients whose seizures were caused by electrolyte disturbances or hypoglycemia, or whose seizures did respond to pyridoxine were excluded. Patients previously treated with other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), with the exception of single PB doses before and during titration, were excluded. LEV was administered orally, increasing the dose by 10mg/(kg day) over 3 days. Endpoint was the need of any additional AEDs (or PB) after day 3, or 3 months of LEV treatment. A decision regarding further treatment was made on an individual basis and follow-up was documented up to 8 months of age.

RESULTS

No severe adverse effects were observed. Mild sedation was reported in one infant. All six patients treated with oral LEV became seizure free within 6 days. Five patients remained seizure free after 3 months with ongoing LEV monotherapy. One infant developed pharmacoresistant epilepsy. Seizures relapsed later in the clinical course of two more patients, one of whom was no longer under LEV therapy.

DISCUSSION

Results from our small patient group indicate that LEV may be an alternative therapeutic option in neonatal seizures.

Efficacy and safety of adjunctive levetiracetam therapy in pediatric intractable epilepsy

To investigate the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam adjunctive therapy in childhood intractable epilepsy, data were reviewed for 130 children who had >or=4 seizures per month, whose seizures were intractable to an initial >or=2 antiepileptic drugs, and who could be monitored for at least 6 months after levetiracetam add-on. Reduction in seizure frequency and related variables were investigated. Sixty-two of the 130 patients (48%) showed a seizure reduction of >or=50%, and 28 patients (22%) became seizure-free. A reduction in seizures by >or=50% was observed in 33/64 in children with partial seizures (52%) and in 29/66 children with generalized seizures (44%). Efficacy did not differ significantly among seizure types. Overall efficacy was unaffected by abnormalities evident from magnetic resonance imaging, by mental retardation, or by maintenance dose of levetiracetam. The mean maintenance dose of levetiracetam was 47.0mg/kg per day (S.D. = +/- 29.7), and mean follow-up duration was 13.4 months (S.D. =+/- 8.7). No demographic features differed significantly between patients with seizure freedom and without seizure remission. Levetiracetam was discontinued in 24 children at last visit (retention rate, 82%). The most common complaint was irritability (5%), and none of the adverse events were life threatening. In conclusion, levetiracetam adjunctive therapy is effective and safe for childhood intractable epilepsy.

Rapid infusion of a loading dose of intravenous levetiracetam with minimal dilution: a safety study

Intravenous antiepileptic drugs are required in patients needing urgent treatment or unable to take oral medication. The safety of intravenous levetiracetam has been established in prospective studies of adult epilepsy and healthy participants. The authors performed a prospective, single-center study to evaluate the safety of a rapid loading dose of intravenous levetiracetam. Patients were divided into 3 equal dosing groups (N = 15 each): 20, 40, and 60 mg/kg (corresponding to maximum doses of 1, 2, and 3 g). Electrocardiogram and safety assessment were performed during the infusion. Ages were 4 to 32 years. Postinfusion serum levetiracetam concentrations were 14 to 189 microg/mL. There were no significant changes in blood pressure, no local infusion site reactions, and no electrocardiogram abnormalities. The authors concluded that high serum levels of parenteral levetiracetam can be achieved rapidly and safely, in a small infusion volume. This finding has important implications for the treatment of status epilepticus.

Levetiracetam in children with refractory epilepsy: lack of correlation between plasma concentration and efficacy

PURPOSE

The goals of this study are to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam (LEV) as add-on therapy in children with refractory epilepsies and to determine the value of LEV blood level monitoring in this population.

METHODS

Sixty-nine children (39 males and 30 females) treated with LEV between 2006 and 2007 were selected. Their medical files were reviewed for LEV efficacy and tolerability. In a subgroup of children currently taking LEV, plasma concentrations were determined by high performance liquid chromatography by ultraviolet detection (HPLC-UV) method and correlated with the given dose per kilo as well as clinical response.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients (74%) had a more than 50% reduction in seizure frequency with 16 patients (23%) becoming seizure free on LEV. Eighteen (26%) patients had a less than 50% reduction in seizure frequency. Adverse events due to LEV ranged from mild to moderate in only 18 patients (26%). The most frequently observed were drowsiness, behavioral difficulties, increase in seizure frequency and headaches. The majority (60.5%) of the responders received doses between 10 and 50mg/kg/day and had a plasma concentration (PC) between 5 and 40microg/ml. However, we found no clear correlation between PC and efficacy.

CONCLUSION

Levetiracetam given twice a day in children with refractory epilepsy reduces seizure frequency in all types of epilepsy. In children, LEV is a broad spectrum anticonvulsant with a favourable safety profile.

Adjunctive levetiracetam in infants and young children with refractory partial-onset seizures

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive levetiracetam in very young children (aged 1 month to <4 years) with partial-onset seizures inadequately controlled with one or two antiepileptic drugs.

METHODS

This multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study consisted of a 48-h inpatient baseline video-EEG (electroencephalography) and a 5-day inpatient treatment period (1-day up-titration; 48-h evaluation video-EEG in the last 2 days). Children who experienced at least two partial-onset seizures during the 48-h baseline video-EEG were randomized to either levetiracetam [40 mg/kg/day (age 1 to <6 months); 50 mg/kg/day (age >or=6 months to <4 years] or placebo.

RESULTS

Of 175 patients screened, 116 patients were randomized [60 levetiracetam; 56 placebo; intent-to-treat (ITT) population], and 111 completed the study. The responder rate in average daily partial-onset seizures frequency (48-h video-EEG monitoring; primary efficacy variable) was 43.1% for levetiracetam [modified ITT (mITT) = 58] versus 19.6% for placebo (mITT = 51; p=0.013), with odds ratio for response 3.11 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.22-8.26]. The median percent reduction from baseline in average daily partial-onset seizure frequency was 43.6% for levetiracetam and 7.1% for placebo with a median difference between treatment groups of 39.2% (95% CI, 17.5-62.2; p < 0.001). In general, levetiracetam was well tolerated. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by 55.0% levetiracetam- and 44.6% placebo-treated patients (ITT population). The most frequently reported adverse events were somnolence (13.3% levetiracetam, 1.8% placebo) and irritability (11.7% levetiracetam, 0% placebo).

DISCUSSION

Adjunctive levetiracetam is an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment for partial-onset seizures in infants and young children.

Add-on levetiracetam in children and adolescents with refractory epilepsy: results of an open-label multi-centre study

PURPOSE

To study the efficacy and tolerability of add-on levetiracetam in children and adolescents with refractory epilepsy.

METHODS

In this prospective multi-centre, open-label, add-on study, 33 children aged 4-16 years (median 8.5 years) with epilepsy refractory to at least two antiepileptic drugs were treated with levetiracetam in addition to their present treatment regimen with a follow-up of 26 weeks. The starting dose of 10 mg/kg/day was increased with 2-week steps of 10 mg/kg/day, if necessary, up to a maximum dose of 60 mg/kg/day.

RESULTS

Retention rate was 69.7% after 26 weeks on a median levetiracetam dosage of 22 mg/kg/day. Four children dropped-out because levetiracetam was ineffective, four because seizure frequency increased and/or seizures became more severe, and two because they developed aggressive behaviour. Compared to their baseline seizure frequency, 13 children (39.4%) had a >50% seizure reduction 12 weeks after initiation of levetiracetam, and 17 children (51.5%) at 26 weeks. At 26 weeks, nine children (27.3%) had been seizure-free for at least the last 4 weeks, terminal remission ranged from 0 to 187 days (mean 46 days). Levetiracetam was effective in both partial and primary generalized seizures, but had most effect in partial seizures. Most reported side effects were hyperactivity (48.5%), somnolence (36.4%), irritability (33.3%) and aggressive behaviour (27.3%). Severity of most side effects was mild. Five children had a serious adverse event, which all concerned hospital admissions that were not related to levetiracetam use.

CONCLUSION

Levetiracetam proved to be an effective and well-tolerated add-on treatment in this group of children with refractory epilepsy.