Abatacept in the treatment of localized scleroderma: A pediatric case series and systematic literature review

Use of biologic drug in the treatment of localized scleroderma and systemic sclerosis in children: A scoping review

OBJECTIVE

Biologic drugs are a potential treatment option in resistant cases of juvenile scleroderma. In this review, we aimed to examine previous studies regarding biologic drug use in pediatric patients with localized scleroderma and systemic sclerosis.

METHODS

We performed a search on MEDLINE and Scopus for articles involving pediatric localized scleroderma and systemic sclerosis patients treated with biologic drugs.

RESULTS

We identified 17 articles describing 58 pediatric patients with localized scleroderma treated with biologic drugs and 12 articles describing 29 pediatric patients with systemic sclerosis treated with biologic drugs during our literature search. The most frequently used biologic drug in localized scleroderma treatment was abatacept (55.2 %), followed by tocilizumab (48.3 %). These biologic drugs were mainly preferred for treating resistant/progressive skin disease in pediatric patients with localized scleroderma (58.5 % and 68.8 %, respectively). The improvement rates associated with abatacept and tocilizumab were 92.9 % and 77.4 %, respectively. Adverse events were observed in 23.5 % of all localized scleroderma patients. The most frequently used biologic drug in systemic sclerosis treatment was rituximab (51.7 %), followed by tocilizumab (44.8 %). Rituximab was predominantly favored for managing cardiac involvement (45.5 %), whereas tocilizumab was preferred for pulmonary involvement (50 %) in pediatric patients with systemic sclerosis. The improvement rates associated with rituximab and tocilizumab were 72.7 % and 94.1 %, respectively. Adverse events were reported in 40 % of all systemic sclerosis patients.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed that abatacept and tocilizumab were more frequently used in patients with localized scleroderma, while rituximab and tocilizumab were the predominantly used biologics in patients with systemic sclerosis. The improvement rate with these biologics were quite high with acceptable safety profile.

Disabling pansclerotic morphoea: a century of discovery

BACKGROUND

Disabling pansclerotic morphoea (DPM) is a rare systemic inflammatory disorder at the severe end of the localized scleroderma spectrum. It primarily affects children < 14 years old. DPM is characterized by rapid sclerosis with circumferential involvement that frequently extends to the fascia, muscle and bone. Disease progression often involves the development of sclerotic plaques, chronic skin ulcers and painful joint contractures, leading to patient immobility and a high mortality rate. Internal organ fibrosis is typically absent. The aggressive and systemic nature of DPM leads patients to seek multidisciplinary care. Current treatments are targeted toward immunomodulation and measures to preserve mobility while limiting infection, but they often have limited efficacy.

OBJECTIVES

To summarize all patients with DPM reported in the English-language literature, common clinical symptoms, laboratory investigations and treatments reported to date.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted on PubMed and Google Scholar. All English-language original articles, case reports, abstracts and letters to the editor were included. Each publication was reviewed for diagnosis, clinical presentation, available laboratory/histological studies, treatment and outcome.

RESULTS

We identified 52 reports comprising 86 patients published up to December 2023. Assessment of published cases suggested that the number of treatments does not influence disease outcome and that female patients are younger at the time of reported death.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinician familiarity and awareness of common DPM symptoms are important for an accurate and early diagnosis. Knowledge of treatments that have been reported to be effective in mitigating disease progression may be helpful in expanding the available treatment options.

Consensus statement on the diagnosis and treatment of sclerosing diseases of the skin, Part 1: Localized scleroderma, systemic sclerosis and overlap syndromes

The term 'sclerosing diseases of the skin' comprises specific dermatological entities, which have fibrotic changes of the skin in common. These diseases mostly manifest in different clinical subtypes according to cutaneous and extracutaneous involvement and can sometimes be difficult to distinguish from each other. The present consensus provides an update to the 2017 European Dermatology Forum Guidelines, focusing on characteristic clinical and histopathological features, diagnostic scores and the serum autoantibodies most useful for differential diagnosis. In addition, updated strategies for the first- and advanced-line therapy of sclerosing skin diseases are addressed in detail. Part 1 of this consensus provides clinicians with an overview of the diagnosis and treatment of localized scleroderma (morphea), and systemic sclerosis including overlap syndromes.

Non-invasive imaging and clinical skin scores in juvenile localized scleroderma

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether in juvenile localized scleroderma (JLS), non-invasive imaging can differentiate affected from non-affected skin and whether imaging correlates with a validated skin score [Localised Scleroderma Cutaneous Assessment Tool (LoSCAT)].

METHODS

A total of 25 children with JLS were recruited into a prospective study and a single 'target' lesion was selected. High-frequency ultrasound (HFUS, measuring skin thickness), infrared thermography (IRT, skin temperature), laser Doppler imaging (LDI, skin blood flow) and multispectral imaging (MSI, oxygenation) were performed at four sites: two of affected skin (centre and inner edge of lesion) and two of non-affected skin (1 cm from the edge of the lesion 'outer' and contralateral non-affected side) at four visits at 3 month intervals.

RESULTS

Differences between affected and non-affected skin were detected with all four techniques. Compared with non-affected skin, affected skin was thinner (P < 0.001), with higher temperature (P < 0.001-0.006), perfusion (P < 0.001-0.039) and oxygenation (P < 0.001-0.028). Lesion skin activity (LoSCAT) was positively correlated with centre HFUS [r = 0.32 (95% CI 0.02, 0.61), P = 0.036] and negatively correlated with centre LDI [r = -0.26 (95% CI -0.49, -0.04), P = 0.022]. Lesion skin damage was positively correlated with centre and inner IRT [r = 0.43 (95% CI 0.19, 0.67), P < 0.001 and r = 0.36 (95% CI 0.12, 0.59), P = 0.003, respectively] and with centre and inner LDI [r = 0.37 (95% CI 0.05, 0.69), P = 0.024 and r = 0.41 (95% CI 0.08, 0.74), P = 0.015, respectively].

CONCLUSION

Non-invasive imaging can detect differences between affected and non-affected skin in JLS and may help to differentiate between activity (thicker, less well-perfused skin) and damage (thinner, highly perfused skin).

S2k guideline: Diagnosis and therapy of localized scleroderma

The updated S2k guideline deals with the diagnosis and therapy of localized scleroderma (LoS). LoS represents a spectrum of sclerotic skin diseases in which, depending on the subtype and localisation, structures such as adipose tissue, muscles, joints, and bones may also be affected. Involvement of internal organs or progression to systemic sclerosis does not occur. LoS can be classified into four main forms: limited, generalized, linear, and mixed forms, with some additional subtypes. For cases of limited skin involvement, the guideline primarily recommends therapy with topical corticosteroids. UV therapy can also be recommended. In subtypes with severe skin or musculoskeletal involvement, systemic therapy with methotrexate is recommended. During the active phase of the disease, systemic glucocorticosteroids can be used additionally. In cases of methotrexate and steroid refractory courses, contraindications, or intolerance, mycophenolate mofetil, mycophenolic acid, or abatacept can be considered as second-line systemic therapies. In the case of linear LoS, autologous adipose-derived stem cell transplantation can also be performed for correcting soft tissue defects.

S2k‐Leitlinie: Diagnostik und Therapie der zirkumskripten Sklerodermie

Die vorliegende aktualisierte S2k‐Leitlinie befasst sich mit der Diagnostik und der Therapie der zirkumskripten Sklerodermie (ZS). Diese umfasst ein Spektrum sklerotischer Erkrankungen der Haut mit, je nach Subtyp und Lokalisation, möglicher Beteiligung von hautnahen Strukturen wie Fettgewebe, Muskulatur, Gelenke und Knochen. Ein Befall innerer Organe oder ein Übergang in eine systemische Sklerodermie treten nicht auf. Eingeteilt werden kann die ZS in die vier Hauptformen der limitierten, generalisierten, linearen und gemischten Form. Teilweise existieren weitere Unterformen. Bei limitiertem Hautbefall empfiehlt die Leitlinie primär eine Therapie mit topischen Kortikosteroiden. Eine UV‐Therapie kann ebenfalls sinnvoll sein. Bei Subtypen mit schwerem Hautbefall oder muskuloskelettalem Befall wird eine systemische Therapie mit Methotrexat empfohlen. In der aktiven Phase der Erkrankung können ergänzend systemische Glukokortikosteroide eingesetzt werden. Bei MTX‐ und Steroid‐refraktären Verläufen, Kontraindikation oder Unverträglichkeit sollten Mycophenolat‐Mofetil, Mycophenolsäure oder Abatacept als Systemtherapie der zweiten Wahl eingesetzt werden. Bei einer linearen ZS kann zudem eine autologe Fettstammzelltransplantation zur Korrektur von Weichteildefekten erfolgen.

Recent Advances in Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis and Morphea

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) and morphea are autoimmune sclerosing diseases that cause significant morbidity, and in the case of SSc, mortality. The pathogenesis of both SSc and morphea share vascular dysfunction, auto-reactive T cells and Th2-associated cytokines, such as interleukin 4, and overproduction of transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ). TGFβ stimulates fibroblast collagen and extra-cellular matrix production. Although morphea and SSc have similar pathogenic pathways and histological findings, they are distinct diseases. Recent advances in treatment of morphea, skin sclerosis in SSc, and interstitial lung disease in SSc are focused on targeting known pathogenic pathways.

Systemic therapy in juvenile localized scleroderma

INTRODUCTION

Juvenile localized scleroderma (JLS) is a rare sclerosing disorder of childhood which can result in permanent morbidity and functional disability, if not effectively treated. Treatment should be started in the inflammatory phase before the development of any complication and/or damage.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we will discuss how to assess disease activity and damage in JLS, and propose an escalation plan for systemic treatment, according to a treat-to-target concept. We will discuss the definition of inactive disease and how and when to discontinue medications.

EXPERT OPINION

Before starting treatment, it is extremely important to assess baseline disease activity for treatment response to be adequately checked. Moreover, the activity of the extra cutaneous involvement is an important part of the assessment. Patients should be treated in the 'therapeutic window,' before significant fibrosis results. Most patients should receive systemic treatments; in these patients, Methotrexate should be used as the first-line disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD). However, methotrexate intolerance or non-response is an issue, and these patients should be proposed a treatment escalation according to results of latest studies. Future research can develop better prognostic markers to help to guide our decision.

Identification of lncRNA expression profiles in pediatric localized scleroderma

The role and potential molecular mechanism of inflammatory cells in pediatric localized scleroderma are poorly investigated. In this study, we first investigated the profiling of inflammatory cells in skin samples from pediatric localized scleroderma. Among them, CD4+ T-cells were up-regulated. Co-culture dermal fibroblasts with CD4+ T-cells promoted fibrosis of fibroblasts. Candidate lncRNAs were further explored by lncRNAs-seq between the normal skin tissues and pediatric localized scleroderma tissues, and the lncRNAs-seq between fibroblasts co-cultured with CD4+ T lymphocytes and control fibroblasts. By comparing the two datasets, we identified eight up-regulated and three down-regulated lncRNAs, which were the potential lncRNAs for the phenotype of pediatric localized scleroderma. Here, we identified the CD4+ T-cells infiltration in pediatric localized scleroderma and potential lncRNAs for the treatment of pediatric localized scleroderma.

Treatment of juvenile localized scleroderma: current recommendations, response factors, and potential alternative treatments

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Juvenile localized scleroderma (jLS) is a chronic autoimmune and fibrosing disease associated with a high risk for functional impairment. Antifibrotic options are limited, so current treatment strategies are focused on disease activity control. Pediatric rheumatologists are in consensus on the need to treat with systemic immunosuppressants, in particular, methotrexate. However, more than 30% of patients fail initial methotrexate treatment. This review provides an update on current management and reviews reports on potential alternative treatments.

RECENT FINDINGS

An overview of current treatment recommendations and its efficacy are discussed. Recent studies have identified several factors associated with likelihood of treatment response. These include time to initiation of treatment, certain subtypes, and extracutaneous involvement. Findings from recent reports of alternative systemic immunomodulators, including biologic medications, will be summarized.

SUMMARY

Methotrexate treatment has greatly improved outcome for most jLS patients but a substantial portion have refractory cutaneous and/or extracutaneous disease. Treatment response factors are being identified, which could lead to improved management strategies. Recent studies provide further support on mycophenolate mofetil as an alternative treatment. Data on biologic therapies is encouraging, with data suggesting efficacy for many extracutaneous manifestations but more studies are needed to evaluate these and other options for jLS.

Upcoming treatments for morphea

Morphea (localized scleroderma) is a rare autoimmune connective tissue disease with variable clinical presentations, with an annual incidence of 0.4-2.7 cases per 100,000. Morphea occurs most frequently in children aged 2-14 years, and the disease exhibits a female predominance. Insights into morphea pathogenesis are often extrapolated from studies of systemic sclerosis due to their similar skin histopathologic features; however, clinically they are two distinct diseases as evidenced by different demographics, clinical features, disease course and prognosis. An interplay between genetic factors, epigenetic modifications, immune and vascular dysfunction, along with environmental hits are considered as the main contributors to morphea pathogenesis. In this review, we describe potential new therapies for morphea based on both preclinical evidence and ongoing clinical trials. We focus on different classes of therapeutics, including antifibrotic, anti-inflammatory, cellular and gene therapy, and antisenolytic approaches, and how these target different aspects of disease pathogenesis.

Juvenile Localized Scleroderma: Updates and Differences from Adult-Onset Disease

Children and adolescents with localized scleroderma (LS) are at high risk for extracutaneous-related functional impairment including hemiatrophy, arthropathy, seizures, and vision impairment. Compared with adult-onset LS, pediatric disease has a higher likelihood for poor outcome, with extracutaneous involvement twice as prevalent in linear scleroderma, disease relapses more common, and disease duration more than double. Consensus among pediatric rheumatologists on treating patients at risk for significant morbidity with systemic immunosuppressants has led to major improvements in outcome. This review discusses recent progress in assessment and treatment strategies and in our understanding of key disease pathways.

Pediatric morphea state-of-the-art literature review: Reframing morphea as a systemic disease

Pediatric morphea is an inflammatory, fibrosing dermatologic disorder. Although morphea may be localized to the skin and subcutaneous tissues, differentiating it from systemic sclerosis, there is increasing evidence that morphea is a manifestation of a systemic inflammatory process, with the potential to involve many organ systems. Given the potential risk for irreversible sequelae, pediatric morphea should be treated early and aggressively. Long-term disease monitoring is essential.

Preliminary evidence on abatacept safety and efficacy in refractory juvenile localized scleroderma

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of abatacept treatment for refractory juvenile localized scleroderma (jLS) in a retrospective study.

METHODS

A multicentre cohort study was performed to evaluate jLS subjects treated with abatacept with follow-up for 12 months to maximum of 24 months. Assessments at 6-month intervals included skin activity measures and physician global assessment of activity (PGA-A). Descriptive statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Eighteen subjects were studied with median age of 13.4 years, the majority had linear scleroderma subtype, and musculoskeletal involvement. All had previously failed MTX and/or mycophenolate mofetil treatment and glucocorticoids. Abatacept was added to the subject's maintenance DMARD treatment; 13 also received glucocorticoids at start of abatacept. No serious adverse events occurred. Skin activity and PGA-A scores declined in nearly all by 6 months and continued to improve from 6 to 12 months. At 12 months, 15 (83%) subjects were considered responders, two (11%) treatment failures, and one dropped out for adverse event. Response was sustained for 11 (61%) subjects to 18 months and eight (44%) to 24 months. Overall, four (22%) subjects were treatment failures and three (16.7%) discontinued abatacept for adverse event. Active musculoskeletal problems improved in most affected subjects. Ten subjects were able to discontinue initial glucocorticoid and six concomitant DMARD treatment.

CONCLUSION

Abatacept was found to be safe and effective for jLS subjects refractory to standard of care treatment. Subjects experienced improvement in both skin and musculoskeletal activity. Prospective studies should be performed to more fully evaluate abatacept's efficacy.

A review on applications of abatacept in systemic rheumatic diseases

Abatacept is a CTLA-4Ig fusion protein that selectively modulates the CD80/CD86:CD28 costimulatory pathway required for full T-cell activation. The FDA has approved it to be used to treat adult rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and adult active psoriatic arthritis. Considering the vital pathogenic role of the CTLA-4 pathway in autoimmune diseases, abatacept could efficiently treat other systemic rheumatic diseases. Here we reviewed the published literature to profile the perspectives about the off-label uses of abatacept, especially in those refractory cases with inadequate responses to conventional therapies and biologic agents. Abatacept can be a promising therapeutic option and contribute to reducing hormone dependence and correlated adverse events.

Diagnosis and management of morphoea in children: an overview

Paediatric morphoea (localized scleroderma) is an inflammatory sclerosing disorder of the skin and subcutis associated with tissue atrophy. It is thought that the disease develops on the background of genetic predisposition (e.g. mosaicism for the common linear variant) initiated by various trigger factors, and that detected autoantibodies and inflammatory cytokines represent secondary epiphenomena. In contrast to the common belief that morphoea is a benign self-limiting disorder, long-term data indicate that its chronicity, relapsing nature and extracutaneous complications lead to significant morbidity, particularly when the disease starts in early childhood. Early recognition may be challenging, and the most important clinical clues are band-like distribution, atrophy of underlying tissue, skin sclerosis, and localized loss of body/scalp hair, eyelashes or eyebrows. Extracutaneous manifestations occur in up to 20% of patients, with arthritis/arthralgia and neurological symptoms being most frequently observed, followed by ophthalmological complications such as uveitis. Corticosteroids and methotrexate are highly effective as first-line therapy in morphoea, leading to partial reversal of skin manifestations. However, the development of atrophy is not sufficiently prevented by standard therapy. There is a relapse rate of 25%-48% within the first years after stopping treatment, thus long-term follow-up is warranted. Mycophenolate mofetil seems to be a beneficial second-line therapy, and a new drug, abatacept, also seems to be a promising and well-tolerated second-line treatment option. Additionally, autologous fat injections are beneficial and may be used as an adjunct to ongoing therapy.