To SABR or not to SABR? Indications and contraindications for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in the treatment of early-stage, oligometastatic, or oligoprogressive non-small cell lung cancer

A 4D-CBCT correction network based on contrastive learning for dose calculation in lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to present a deep-learning network called contrastive learning-based cycle generative adversarial networks (CLCGAN) to mitigate streak artifacts and correct the CT value in four-dimensional cone beam computed tomography (4D-CBCT) for dose calculation in lung cancer patients.

METHODS

4D-CBCT and 4D computed tomography (CT) of 20 patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer were used to paired train the deep-learning model. The lung tumors were located in the right upper lobe, right lower lobe, left upper lobe, and left lower lobe, or in the mediastinum. Additionally, five patients to create 4D synthetic computed tomography (sCT) for test. Using the 4D-CT as the ground truth, the quality of the 4D-sCT images was evaluated by quantitative and qualitative assessment methods. The correction of CT values was evaluated holistically and locally. To further validate the accuracy of the dose calculations, we compared the dose distributions and calculations of 4D-CBCT and 4D-sCT with those of 4D-CT.

RESULTS

The structural similarity index measure (SSIM) and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) of the 4D-sCT increased from 87% and 22.31 dB to 98% and 29.15 dB, respectively. Compared with cycle consistent generative adversarial networks, CLCGAN enhanced SSIM and PSNR by 1.1% (p < 0.01) and 0.42% (p < 0.01). Furthermore, CLCGAN significantly decreased the absolute mean differences of CT value in lungs, bones, and soft tissues. The dose calculation results revealed a significant improvement in 4D-sCT compared to 4D-CBCT. CLCGAN was the most accurate in dose calculations for left lung (V5Gy), right lung (V5Gy), right lung (V20Gy), PTV (D98%), and spinal cord (D2%), with the relative dose difference were reduced by 6.84%, 3.84%, 1.46%, 0.86%, 3.32% compared to 4D-CBCT.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the satisfactory results obtained in terms of image quality, CT value measurement, it can be concluded that CLCGAN-based corrected 4D-CBCT can be utilized for dose calculation in lung cancer.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Oligoprogressive and Oligorecurrent Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in oligoprogressive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is controversial. We evaluated whether SBRT in a subset of patients with oligoprogressive or oligorecurrent NSCLC offers a durable response, obviating the need to change systemic therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 168 NSCLC patients who underwent SBRT for oligoprogressive or oligorecurrent disease was performed. Oligoprogression was defined as progression in ≤5 lesions during or after systemic therapy following an initial complete or partial response. Oligorecurrence was defined as progression while off systemic therapy. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and time to next treatment or death (TNT-D) were estimated.

RESULTS

Median age was 68 years. Sixty-seven percent of patients were on systemic therapy at the time of progression. Progression at the primary site was present in 31% of the patients. The number of sites of metastatic progression was 0 to 2 in 76% and 3 to 5 in 24% of the patients. Two-year OS and PFS were 56% (95%CI 46%-64%) and 14% (95%CI 8%-21%), respectively. Median TNT-D was 9 months (95%CI 6-11). No grade 4 or 5 toxicity was seen. In multivariable analysis, patients with 3 to 5 sites of metastatic progression had worse OS (HR 2.6, 95%CI 1.5-4.3, P < .001) and shorter TNT-D (HR 1.7, 95%CI 1.1-2.5, P = .01) than those with 0 to 2 sites.

CONCLUSION

SBRT is a safe and viable treatment option for oligoprogressive and oligorecurrent NSCLC. Patients with 0 to 2 sites had better OS and longer TNT-D compared to those with 3 to 5 lesions.

Clinical Factors That Affect Fiducial Tracking in Robotic SABR for Lung Tumors

Purpose

SABR is a treatment option for patients with lung tumors that employs fiducials to track tumors during the breathing cycle. Currently, there is a paucity of data on how relative fiducial location and patient clinical characteristics affect fiducial tracking and clinical outcomes. This study aimed to identify factors that reduce the number of fiducials tracked with respiratory motion management during SABR.

Methods and Materials

An institutional review board-approved retrospective review was performed of patients receiving robotic SABR for lung tumors at our institution from 2016 to 2019. Clinical data including demographics, medical history, treatment data, and follow-up were collected. Fiducial geometries were obtained with Velocity contouring software and MATLAB. Mann-Whitney U, χ2, and t tests were completed using MedCalc.

Results

A total of 73 patients with 77 treatments were identified. The χ2 analysis revealed that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was associated with having 3 or more fiducials tracked (P = .034). Tumors in lower lobes were associated with higher rates of uncertainty errors (P = .015). The number of fiducials tracked had no effect on local tumor control or overall survival, with a median of 36 months of follow-up. A total of 28 treatments had fiducial centroid data available for geometric analysis. The most common tracking errors were rigid body error (RBE; 57%) and spacing errors (36.4%). Spacing errors had a shorter average minimum interfiducial distance than nonspacing errors (1.0 cm vs 1.7 cm, respectively; P = .017). RBE treatments had a longer average maximum distance than non-RBE treatments (4.0 cm vs 3.0 cm; P = .022).

Conclusions

Greater motion in lower lobes can contribute to certain tracking errors that prevent more fiducials from being tracked. Maintaining interfiducial distance between experimentally determined guidelines may limit spacing errors and RBEs, the 2 most common tracking errors. An increased number of patients in a data set may result in stronger correlations between patient and tumor factors and outcomes.

A cycle generative adversarial network for improving the quality of four-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography images

BACKGROUND

Four-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography (4D-CBCT) can visualize moving tumors, thus adaptive radiation therapy (ART) could be improved if 4D-CBCT were used. However, 4D-CBCT images suffer from severe imaging artifacts. The aim of this study is to investigate the use of synthetic 4D-CBCT (sCT) images created by a cycle generative adversarial network (CycleGAN) for ART for lung cancer.

METHODS

Unpaired thoracic 4D-CBCT images and four-dimensional multislice computed tomography (4D-MSCT) images of 20 lung-cancer patients were used for training. High-quality sCT lung images generated by the CycleGAN model were tested on another 10 cases. The mean and mean absolute errors were calculated to assess changes in the computed tomography number. The structural similarity index measure (SSIM) and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) were used to compare the sCT and original 4D-CBCT images. Moreover, a volumetric modulation arc therapy plan with a dose of 48 Gy in four fractions was recalculated using the sCT images and compared with ideal dose distributions observed in 4D-MSCT images.

RESULTS

The generated sCT images had fewer artifacts, and lung tumor regions were clearly observed in the sCT images. The mean and mean absolute errors were near 0 Hounsfield units in all organ regions. The SSIM and PSNR results were significantly improved in the sCT images by approximately 51% and 18%, respectively. Moreover, the results of gamma analysis were significantly improved; the pass rate reached over 90% in the doses recalculated using the sCT images. Moreover, each organ dose index of the sCT images agreed well with those of the 4D-MSCT images and were within approximately 5%.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed CycleGAN enhances the quality of 4D-CBCT images, making them comparable to 4D-MSCT images. Thus, clinical implementation of sCT-based ART for lung cancer is feasible.

Optimal and actual rates of Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR) utilisation for primary lung cancer in Australia

•

Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR) plays a major role in the management of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

•

An evidence-based model is developed to estimate optimal rates of lung SABR utilisation within the Australian population.

•

Optimal utilisation rates are compared against actual utilisation rates to evaluate service provision.

Background and purpose

Radiotherapy utilisation rates considerably vary across different countries and service providers, highlighting the need to establish reliable benchmarks against which utilisation rates can be assessed. Here, optimal utilisation rates of Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR) for lung cancer are estimated and compared against actual utilisation rates to identify potential shortfalls in service provision.

Materials and Methods

An evidence-based optimal utilisation model was constructed after reviewing practice guidelines and identifying indications for lung SABR based on the best available evidence. The proportions of patients likely to develop each indication were obtained, whenever possible, from Australian population-based studies. Sensitivity analysis was performed to account for variations in epidemiological data. Practice pattern studies were reviewed to obtain actual utilisation rates.

Results

A total of 6% of all lung cancer patients were estimated to optimally require SABR at least once during the course of their illness (95% CI: 4–6%). Optimal utilisation rates were estimated to be 32% for stage I and 10% for stage II NSCLC. Actual utilisation rates for stage I NSCLC varied between 6 and 20%. For patients with inoperable stage I, 27–74% received SABR compared to the estimated optimal rate of 82%.

Conclusion

The estimated optimal SABR utilisation rates for lung cancer can serve as useful benchmarks to highlight gaps in service delivery and help plan for more adequate and efficient provision of care. The model can be easily modified to determine optimal utilisation rates in other populations or updated to reflect any changes in practice guidelines or epidemiological data.

Novel Radiation Therapy Paradigms and Immunomodulation: Heresies and Hope

Radiation therapy benefits the majority of patients across the spectrum of cancer types. However, both local and distant tumor recurrences limit its clinical success. While departing from the established tenet of fractionation in clinical radiotherapy, ablative-intensity hypofractionated radiotherapy, especially stereotactic radiosurgery and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy, has emerged as an alternative paradigm achieving unprecedented rates of local tumor control. Direct tumor cell killing has been assumed to be the primary therapeutic mode of action of such ablative radiation. But with increasing recognition that tumor responses also depend on the immunostimulatory or immunosuppressive status of the tumor microenvironment, the immunologic effect of ablative radiotherapy is emerging as a key contributor to antitumor response. More recently, novel radiation modalities, such as spatially fractionated radiotherapy and ultrahigh dose rate FLASH irradiation, that venture even further from conventional paradigms have shown promise of increasing the therapeutic index of radiation therapy with the potential of immunomodulation. Here, we review the immunomodulatory impact of novel radiation therapy paradigms, heretofore considered radiobiological heresies, a deeper understanding of which is imperative to realizing fully their potential for more curative cancer therapy.

ITV versus mid-ventilation for treatment planning in lung SBRT: a comparison of target coverage and PTV adequacy by using in-treatment 4D cone beam CT

Background

The internal target volume (ITV) approach and the mid-ventilation (MidV) concept are the two main respiratory motion-management strategies under free breathing. The purpose of this work was to compare the actual in-treatment target coverage during volumetric modulated arctherapy (VMAT) delivered through both ITV-based and MidV-based planning target volume (PTV) and to provide knowledge in choosing the optimal PTV for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung lesions.

Methods and materials

Thirty-two lung cancer patients treated by a VMAT technique were included in the study. For each fraction, the mean time-weighted position of the target was localized by using a 4-dimensional cone-beam CT (4D-CBCT)-based image guidance procedure. The respiratory-correlated location of the gross tumor volume (GTV) during treatment delivery was determined for each fraction by using in-treatment 4D-CBCT images acquired concurrently with VMAT delivery (4D-CBCT_in-treat). The GTV was delineated from each of the ten respiratory phase-sorted 4D-CBCT_in-treat datasets for each fraction. We defined target coverage as the average percentage of the GTV included within the PTV during the patient’s breathing cycle averaged over the treatment course. Target coverage and PTVs were reported for a MidV-based PTV (PTV_MidV) using dose-probabilistic margins and three ITV-based PTVs using isotropic margins of 5 mm (PTV_{ITV + 5mm}), 4 mm (PTV_{ITV + 4mm}) and 3 mm (PTV_{ITV + 3mm}). The in-treatment baseline displacements and target motion amplitudes were reported to evaluate the impact of both parameters on target coverage.

Results

Overall, 100 4D-CBCT_in-treat images were analyzed. The mean target coverage was 98.6, 99.6, 98.9 and 97.2% for PTV_MidV, PTV_{ITV + 5mm}, PTV_{ITV + 4mm} and PTV_{ITV + 3mm}, respectively. All the PTV margins led to a target coverage per treatment higher than 95% in at least 90% of the evaluated cases. Compared to PTV_{ITV + 5mm}, PTV_MidV, PTV_{ITV + 4mm} and PTV_{ITV + 3mm} had mean PTV reductions of 16, 19 and 33%, respectively.

Conclusion

When implementing VMAT with 4D-CBCT-based image guidance, an ITV-based approach with a tighter margin than the commonly used 5 mm margin remains an alternative to the MidV-based approach for reducing healthy tissue exposure in lung SBRT. Compared to PTV_MidV, PTV_{ITV + 3mm} significantly reduced the PTV while still maintaining an adequate in-treatment target coverage.

Moderate hypofractionated image-guided thoracic radiotherapy for locally advanced node-positive non-small cell lung cancer patients with very limited lung function: a case report

Patients with locally advanced lung cancer and very limited pulmonary function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] ≤ 1 L) have dismal prognosis and undergo palliative treatment or best supportive care. We describe two cases of locally advanced node-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with very limited lung function treated with induction chemotherapy and moderate hypofractionated image-guided radiotherapy (Hypo-IGRT). Hypo-IGRT was delivered to a total dose of 45 Gy to the primary tumor and involved lymph nodes. Planning was based on positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/ CT) and four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT). Internal target volume (ITV) was defined as the overlap of gross tumor volume delineated on 10 phases of 4D-CT. ITV to planning target volume margin was 5 mm in all directions. Both patients showed good clinical and radiological response. No relevant toxicity was documented. Hypo-IGRT is feasible treatment option in locally advanced node-positive NSCLC patients with very limited lung function (FEV1 ≤ 1 L).

Radical Treatment of Stage II Non-small-cell Lung Cancer With Nonsurgical Approaches: A Multi-institution Report of Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Standard management of stage II non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is surgery, often followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. However, some patients do not undergo surgery for various reasons. We examined outcomes in this defined patient group.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of patients with stage II NSCLC treated nonsurgically with curative intent from 2002 to 2012 across 3 academic cancer centers. Data collected included demographics, comorbidities, staging, treatments, and survival. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). We assessed factors associated with treatment choice and OS.

RESULTS

A total of 158 patients were included: the median age was 74 years (range, 50-91 years), 44% were female, and 68% had a performance status of 0 to 1. The stage II groupings of the patients were T2b-T3 N0 in 55% and N1 in 45%. The most common reasons for inoperability were inadequate pulmonary reserve (27%) and medical comorbidities (24%). All patients received radical radiotherapy (RT) (median, 60 Gy [range, 48-75 Gy]). Seventy-three percent received RT alone; 24% received concurrent and 3% sequential chemoradiotherapy (CRT). In multivariate analyses, CRT was less likely in older patients (≥ 70 years) (odds ratio [OR], 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11-0.70; P = .006) and in patients with higher (> 5) Charlson comorbidity scores (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.13-0.90; P = .03) or normal (< 10 × 10⁹/L) white blood cell counts (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.09-0.73; P = .01). At the time of our analysis, 74% have died. The median OS was 22.9 months (range, 17.1-26.6 months). Patients who had undergone CRT had a significantly longer median OS than those receiving RT alone (39.1 vs. 20.5 months; P = .0019), confirmed in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.21-0.69; P = .001).

CONCLUSION

Nonsurgical approaches to management of stage II NSCLC are varied. Treatment with CRT was associated with significantly longer survival compared with RT alone. A randomized trial may be warranted.

Phase II Study of a Radiotherapy Total Dose Increase in Hypoxic Lesions Identified by 18F-Misonidazole PET/CT in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma (RTEP5 Study)

See an invited perspective on this article on page 1043.This multicenter phase II study investigated a selective radiotherapy dose increase to tumor areas with significant ¹⁸F-misonidazole (¹⁸F-FMISO) uptake in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Methods: Eligible patients had locally advanced NSCLC and no contraindication to concomitant chemoradiotherapy. The ¹⁸F-FMISO uptake on PET/CT was assessed by trained experts. If there was no uptake, 66 Gy were delivered. In ¹⁸F-FMISO-positive patients, the contours of the hypoxic area were transferred to the radiation oncologist. It was necessary for the radiotherapy dose to be as high as possible while fulfilling dose-limiting constraints for the spinal cord and lungs. The primary endpoint was tumor response (complete response plus partial response) at 3 mo. The secondary endpoints were toxicity, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival at 1 y. The target sample size was set to demonstrate a response rate of 40% or more (bilateral α = 0.05, power 1-β = 0.95). Results: Seventy-nine patients were preincluded, 54 were included, and 34 were ¹⁸F-FMISO-positive, 24 of whom received escalated doses of up to 86 Gy. The response rate at 3 mo was 31 of 54 (57%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 43%-71%) using RECIST 1.1 (17/34 responders in the ¹⁸F-FMISO-positive group). DFS and overall survival at 1 y were 0.86 (95% CI, 0.77-0.96) and 0.63 (95% CI, 0.49-0.74), respectively. DFS was longer in the ¹⁸F-FMISO-negative patients (P = 0.004). The radiotherapy dose was not associated with DFS when adjusting for the ¹⁸F-FMISO status. One toxic death (66 Gy) and 1 case of grade 4 pneumonitis (>66 Gy) were reported. Conclusion: Our approach results in a response rate of 40% or more, with acceptable toxicity. ¹⁸F-FMISO uptake in NSCLC patients is strongly associated with poor prognosis features that could not be reversed by radiotherapy doses up to 86 Gy.

Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy for Lung Oligometastases: Predictive Parameters of Early Response by 18FDG-PET/CT

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to investigate fludeoxyglucose F 18 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸FDG-PET/CT) parameters as predictive of response after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for lung oligometastases.

METHODS

The inclusion criteria of the current retrospective study were as follows: (1) lung oligometastases treated by SABR, (2) presence of ¹⁸FDG-PET/CT before and after SABR for at least two subsequent evaluations, (3) Karnofsky performance status higher than 80, and (4) life expectancy longer than 6 months. All patients were treated with a biologically equivalent dose of at least 100 Gy with an alpha/beta ratio of 10. The following metabolic parameters were semiquantitatively defined: maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max), mean standardized uptake value (SUV_mean), metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients met the inclusion criteria, for a total of 70 lung metastases. The pre-SABR median SUV_max was 6.5 (range 4-17), the median SUV_mean was 3.7 (range 2.5-6.5), and the median metabolic tumor volume was 2.3 cm³ (0.2-31 cm³). The following metabolic parameters were significantly related to complete response at 6 months: SUV_max less than 5 (p < 0.001) and SUV_mean less than 3.5 (p = 0.03). ΔSUV_max at 3 to 6 months was +126% for lesions with in-field progression versus -26% for the remaining lesions (p = 0.002). ΔSUV_mean at 3 to 6 months was +15% for lesions with in-field progression versus -26% for the remaining metastases (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

In the current analysis, complete response from lung metastasis at 6 months after stereotactic body radiation therapy was significantly associated with both the maximum and mean values of pre-SABR ¹⁸FDG-PET/CT SUV. Longer-term trials are strongly advocated to improve the personalization of the monitoring of tumor response in patients with lung oligometastases and, consequently, monitoring of the cost-effectiveness of the health care.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligoprogressive cancer

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a focused tumour treatment that produces high local control rates with low toxicity. Its use in metastatic cancer is evolving rapidly, with purported benefits in the oligometastatic setting and for better palliation of symptomatic disease. Another potential indication for SBRT is in the setting of oligoprogression, where there is progression of a solitary or a few tumours while all other tumours are responding or stable on a systemic therapy strategy. SBRT to the progressing "rogue" tumours may delay the need to start or change systemic therapy. This may have clinical benefits including improved progression-free/overall survival and quality of life for patients. This review will summarize the limited published data. More prospective clinical trials are urgently needed to better identify and quantify the potential clinical benefits.

Does the mobilization of circulating tumour cells during cancer therapy cause metastasis?

Despite progressive improvements in the management of patients with locoregionally confined, advanced-stage solid tumours, distant metastasis remains a very common - and usually fatal - mode of failure after attempted curative treatment. Surgery and radiotherapy are the primary curative modalities for these patients, often combined with each other and/or with chemotherapy. Distant metastasis occurring after treatment can arise from previously undetected micrometastases or, alternatively, from persistent locoregional disease. Another possibility is that treatment itself might sometimes cause or promote metastasis. Surgical interventions in patients with cancer, including biopsies, are commonly associated with increased concentrations of circulating tumour cells (CTCs). High CTC numbers are associated with an unfavourable prognosis in many cancers. Radiotherapy and systemic antitumour therapies might also mobilize CTCs. We review the preclinical and clinical data concerning cancer treatments, CTC mobilization and other factors that might promote metastasis. Contemporary treatment regimens represent the best available curative options for patients who might otherwise die from locally confined, advanced-stage cancers; however, if such treatments can promote metastasis, this process must be understood and addressed therapeutically to improve patient survival.

Integration of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Stage IV Oncogene-Driven Lung Cancer

: Genotype-based selection of patients for targeted therapies has had a substantial impact on the treatment of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) directed at cancers driven by oncogenes, such as epidermal growth factor receptor mutations or anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangements, often achieve dramatic responses and result in prolonged survival compared with chemotherapy. However, TKI resistance invariably develops. Disease progression can be limited to only one or a few sites and might not be symptomatic, raising the important question of whether this type of oligoprogression warrants a change in systemic therapy or consideration of local treatment. Recent clinical observations suggest a growing role for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the treatment of oligoprogressive and perhaps even oligopersistent disease (primary and/or metastases) in oncogene-driven NSCLC. SBRT might allow patients to continue with existing TKI treatments longer and delay the need to switch to other systemic options. We review the current data with regard to the use of SBRT for metastatic NSCLC and particularly oncogene-driven disease. Although there is great promise in the marriage of targeted therapies with SBRT, prospective data are urgently needed. In the meantime, such strategies are being used in carefully selected patients, with risk-adapted SBRT dose-fractionation regimens used to optimize the therapeutic index.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or SBRT-like treatments are increasingly being used for oligoprogression in patients with oncogene-driven non-small cell lung cancer. This approach allows patients to extend the duration of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy and has the potential to prolong survival times. Careful patient selection and risk-adapted radiation dosing is of critical importance to minimize toxicity and preserve patient quality of life.

Phase II Trial of SBRT for Stage I NSCLC: Survival, Local Control, and Lung Function at 36 Months

OBJECTIVES

The long-term impact of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) on respiratory function in patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been well studied. The aim of this phase II trial was to assess local control, survival, and lung function at 36 months after treatment.

METHODS

From July 2008 to February 2012, 42 patients in whom inoperable NSCLC with peripheral lesions was diagnosed were consecutively enrolled. Lung function testing included measurement of forced expiratory vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide. All lung function parameters were registered at baseline and evaluated prospectively after SBRT every 6 months for 2 years and annually thereafter.

RESULTS

Of the 42 initial patients, four were excluded. At 36 months after SBRT, 22 patients were still evaluable (12 deaths and four patients lost to follow-up). At 36 months, the rate of local control was 94%. At 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively, overall survival rates were 92%, 75%, and 66%. Median overall survival was 57 months. Grade (G) 3 acute toxicity was observed in four patients (10%). Chronic G1 toxicity was observed in all 38 cases (100%), with the most common type being pneumonitis (26 patients [68%]). The mean lung function parameters at baseline and at 36 months after treatment were as follows: forced expiratory vital capacity 83% versus 79%; forced expiratory volume in 1 second 62% versus 57%; and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide 54% versus 54%. These changes were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

In this trial, local control and survival rates after SBRT were very good. Treatment with SBRT had no significant impact on lung function at 36 months. These findings provide further support for the use of SBRT as a radical treatment for NSCLC. Lung toxicity is minimal, even in patients with poor pulmonary function before treatment.

Approach to the non-operative management of patients with stage II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A survey of Canadian medical and radiation oncologists

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Standard management of stage II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is surgery, often followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. However, some patients do not undergo surgery for various reasons. The optimal non-surgical management of stage II NSCLC is undefined. We surveyed Canadian oncologists to understand current practices.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Canadian oncologists specializing in the management of lung cancer were invited by email to complete an anonymous, online survey developed by the research team. Physician demographics were recorded. Physicians were asked to comment on their practice and make treatment choices in eight clinical scenarios of inoperable stage II NSCLC.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 81/194 physicians (42% response rate), 57% medical and 42% radiation oncologists. Most physicians (90%) had a practice with at least 25% lung cancer patients and 85% were based at an academic institution. Across eight clinical patient scenarios, radical therapy was selected 79-98% of the time. Radical radiotherapy alone and concurrent chemoradiotherapy were the preferred options for these patients, while sequential chemoradiation was less favoured. Nodal status (N0 vs N1) did not influence choice of therapy (p 0.31), but the reason for patient inoperability did (p<0.0001). There was no significant difference in choice of therapy when comparing responses between medical vs radiation oncologists, academic vs community physicians, and physicians with high vs low proportion of lung cancer patients.

CONCLUSION

Most lung cancer physicians manage inoperable stage II NSCLC patients with curative intent, but consensus on how to optimally employ radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy is lacking. Future prospective, randomized trials are warranted.