The use of phenobarbital and other anti-seizure drugs in newborns

Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study on Safety and Electroencephalographic Response to Lacosamide for Neonatal Seizures

BACKGROUND

There is growing evidence supporting the safety and effectiveness of lacosamide in older children. However, minimal data are available for neonates. We aimed to determine the incidence of adverse events associated with lacosamide use and explore the electroencephalographic seizure response to lacosamide in neonates.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from seven pediatric hospitals from January 2009 to February 2020. For safety outcomes, neonates were followed for ≤30 days from index date. Electroencephalographic response of lacosamide was evaluated based on electroencephalographic reports for ≤3 days.

RESULTS

Among 47 neonates, 98% received the first lacosamide dose in the intensive care units. During the median follow-up of 12 days, 19% of neonates died, and the crude incidence rate per 1000 patient-days (95% confidence interval) of the adverse events by diagnostic categories ranged from 2.8 (0.3, 10.2) for blood or lymphatic system disorders and nervous system disorders to 10.5 (4.2, 21.6) for cardiac disorders. Electroencephalographic seizures were observed in 31 of 34 patients with available electroencephalographic data on the index date. There was seizure improvement in 29% of neonates on day 1 and also in 29% of neonates on day 2. On day 3, there was no change in 50% of neonates and unknown change in 50% of neonates.

CONCLUSIONS

The results are reassuring regarding the safety of lacosamide in neonates. Although some neonates had fewer seizures after lacosamide administration, the lack of a comparator arm and reliance on qualitative statements in electroencephalographic reports limit the preliminary efficacy results.

Elevated S100B urine levels predict seizures in infants complicated by perinatal asphyxia and undergoing therapeutic hypothermia

OBJECTIVES

Seizures (SZ) are one of the main complications occurring in infants undergoing therapeutic hypothermia (TH) due to perinatal asphyxia (PA) and hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE). Phenobarbital (PB) is the first-line therapeutic strategy, although data on its potential side-effects need elucidation. We investigated whether: i) PB administration in PA-HIE TH-treated infants affects S100B urine levels, and ii) S100B could be a reliable early predictor of SZ.

METHODS

We performed a prospective case-control study in 88 PA-HIE TH infants, complicated (n=44) or not (n=44) by SZ requiring PB treatment. S100B urine levels were measured at 11 predetermined monitoring time-points from first void up to 96-h from birth. Standard-of-care monitoring parameters were also recorded.

RESULTS

S100B significantly increased in the first 24-h independently from HIE severity in the cases who later developed SZ and requested PB treatment. ROC curve analysis showed that S100B, as SZ predictor, at a cut-off of 2.78 μg/L achieved a sensitivity/specificity of 63 and 84 %, positive/negative predictive values of 83 and 64 %.

CONCLUSIONS

The present results offer additional support to the usefulness of S100B as a trustable diagnostic tool in the clinical daily monitoring of therapeutic and pharmacological procedures in infants complicated by PA-HIE.

Hydrogen gas can ameliorate seizure burden during therapeutic hypothermia in asphyxiated newborn piglets

BACKGROUND

We previously reported that hydrogen (H2) gas combined with therapeutic hypothermia (TH) improved short-term neurological outcomes in asphyxiated piglets. However, the effect on seizure burden was unclear. Using amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG), we compared TH + H2 with TH alone in piglets 24 h after hypoxic-ischemic (HI) insult.

METHODS

After a 40-min insult and resuscitation, 36 piglets ≤24 h old were divided into three groups: normothermia (NT, n = 14), TH alone (33.5 ± 0.5 °C, 24 h, n = 13), and TH + H2 (2.1-2.7% H2 gas, 24 h, n = 9). aEEG was recorded for 24 h post-insult and its background pattern, status epilepticus (SE; recurrent seizures lasting >5 min), and seizure occurrence (Sz; occurring at least once but not fitting the definition of SE) were evaluated. Background findings with a continuous low voltage and burst suppression were considered abnormal.

RESULTS

The percentage of piglets with an abnormal aEEG background (aEEG-BG), abnormal aEEG-BG+Sz and SE was lower with TH + H2 than with TH at 24 h after HI insult. The duration of SE was shorter with TH + H2 and significantly shorter than with NT.

CONCLUSIONS

H2 gas combined with TH ameliorated seizure burden 24 h after HI insult.

IMPACT

In this asphyxiated piglet model, there was a high percentage of animals with an abnormal amplitude-integrated electroencephalography background (aEEG-BG) after hypoxic-ischemic (HI) insult, which may correspond to moderate and severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE). Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) was associated with a low percentage of piglets with EEG abnormalities up to 6 h after HI insult but this percentage increased greatly after 12 h, and TH was not effective in attenuating seizure development. H2 gas combined with TH was associated with a low percentage of piglets with an abnormal aEEG-BG and with a shorter duration of status epilepticus at 24 h after HI insult.

Comparison of the effect of phenobarbital & levetiracetam in the treatment of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) as adjuvant treatment in neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Infants who are born from mothers with substance use disorder might suffer from neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) and need treatment with medicines. One of these medicines is phenobarbital, which may cause side effects in long-term consumption. Alternative drugs can be used to reduce these side effects. This study seeks the comparison of the effects of phenobarbital & levetiracetam as adjuvant therapy in neonatal abstinence syndrome.

METHODS

This randomized clinical trial was performed in one year from May 2021 until May 2022. The neonates who were born from mothers with substance use disorder and had neonatal abstinence syndrome in Afzalipoor Hospital of Kerman were studied. The treatment started with morphine initially and every four hours the infants were checked. The infants who were diagnosed with uncontrolled symptoms After obtaining informed consent from the parents were randomly divided into two groups and treated with secondary drugs, either phenobarbital or levetiracetam.

RESULTS

Based on the obtained results, it was clear that there was no significant difference between the hospitalization time of the two infant groups under therapy (phenobarbital: 18.59 days versus Levetiracetam 18.24 days) (P-value = 0.512). Also, there was no significant difference between both groups in terms of the frequency of re-hospitalization during the first week after discharge, the occurrence of complications, and third treatment line prescription (P-value = 0.644).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the obtained results, like hospitalization duration time (P-value = 0.512) it seems that levetiracetam can be used to substitute phenobarbital in treating neonatal abstinence syndrome.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The current study has been registered in the Iran registry of clinical trials website (fa.irct.ir) on the date 25/2/2022 with registration no. IRCT20211218053444N2.

Anti-seizure medications for neonates with seizures

BACKGROUND

Newborn infants are more prone to seizures than older children and adults. The neuronal injury caused by seizures in neonates often results in long-term neurodevelopmental sequelae. There are several options for anti-seizure medications (ASMs) in neonates. However, the ideal choice of first-, second- and third-line ASM is still unclear. Further, many other aspects of seizure management such as whether ASMs should be initiated for only-electrographic seizures and how long to continue the ASM once seizure control is achieved are elusive.

OBJECTIVES

1. To assess whether any ASM is more or less effective than an alternative ASM (both ASMs used as first-, second- or third-line treatment) in achieving seizure control and improving neurodevelopmental outcomes in neonates with seizures. We analysed EEG-confirmed seizures and clinically-diagnosed seizures separately. 2. To assess maintenance therapy with ASM versus no maintenance therapy after achieving seizure control. We analysed EEG-confirmed seizures and clinically-diagnosed seizures separately. 3. To assess treatment of both clinical and electrographic seizures versus treatment of clinical seizures alone in neonates.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Epistemonikos and three databases in May 2022 and June 2023. These searches were not limited other than by study design to trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that included neonates with EEG-confirmed or clinically diagnosed seizures and compared (1) any ASM versus an alternative ASM, (2) maintenance therapy with ASM versus no maintenance therapy, and (3) treatment of clinical or EEG seizures versus treatment of clinical seizures alone.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors assessed trial eligibility, risk of bias and independently extracted data. We analysed treatment effects in individual trials and reported risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous data, and mean difference (MD) for continuous data, with respective 95% confidence interval (CI). We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 18 trials (1342 infants) in this review. Phenobarbital versus levetiracetam as first-line ASM in EEG-confirmed neonatal seizures (one trial) Phenobarbital is probably more effective than levetiracetam in achieving seizure control after first loading dose (RR 2.32, 95% CI 1.63 to 3.30; 106 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and after maximal loading dose (RR 2.83, 95% CI 1.78 to 4.50; 106 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). However, we are uncertain about the effect of phenobarbital when compared to levetiracetam on mortality before discharge (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.04 to 2.52; 106 participants; very low-certainty evidence), requirement of mechanical ventilation (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.91; 106 participants; very low-certainty evidence), sedation/drowsiness (RR 1.74, 95% CI 0.68 to 4.44; 106 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and epilepsy post-discharge (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.76; 106 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The trial did not report on mortality or neurodevelopmental disability at 18 to 24 months. Phenobarbital versus phenytoin as first-line ASM in EEG-confirmed neonatal seizures (one trial) We are uncertain about the effect of phenobarbital versus phenytoin on achieving seizure control after maximal loading dose of ASM (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.72; 59 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The trial did not report on mortality or neurodevelopmental disability at 18 to 24 months. Maintenance therapy with ASM versus no maintenance therapy in clinically diagnosed neonatal seizures (two trials) We are uncertain about the effect of short-term maintenance therapy with ASM versus no maintenance therapy during the hospital stay (but discontinued before discharge) on the risk of repeat seizures before hospital discharge (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.01; 373 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Maintenance therapy with ASM compared to no maintenance therapy may have little or no effect on mortality before discharge (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.22; 373 participants; low-certainty evidence), mortality at 18 to 24 months (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.34 to 2.61; 111 participants; low-certainty evidence), neurodevelopmental disability at 18 to 24 months (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.13 to 6.12; 108 participants; low-certainty evidence) and epilepsy post-discharge (RR 3.18, 95% CI 0.69 to 14.72; 126 participants; low-certainty evidence). Treatment of both clinical and electrographic seizures versus treatment of clinical seizures alone in neonates (two trials) Treatment of both clinical and electrographic seizures when compared to treating clinical seizures alone may have little or no effect on seizure burden during hospitalisation (MD -1871.16, 95% CI -4525.05 to 782.73; 68 participants; low-certainty evidence), mortality before discharge (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.27; 68 participants; low-certainty evidence) and epilepsy post-discharge (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.12 to 4.73; 35 participants; low-certainty evidence). The trials did not report on mortality or neurodevelopmental disability at 18 to 24 months. We report data from the most important comparisons here; readers are directed to Results and Summary of Findings tables for all comparisons.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Phenobarbital as a first-line ASM is probably more effective than levetiracetam in achieving seizure control after the first loading dose and after the maximal loading dose of ASM (moderate-certainty evidence). Phenobarbital + bumetanide may have little or no difference in achieving seizure control when compared to phenobarbital alone (low-certainty evidence). Limited data and very low-certainty evidence preclude us from drawing any reasonable conclusion on the effect of using one ASM versus another on other short- and long-term outcomes. In neonates who achieve seizure control after the first loading dose of phenobarbital, maintenance therapy compared to no maintenance ASM may have little or no effect on all-cause mortality before discharge, mortality by 18 to 24 months, neurodevelopmental disability by 18 to 24 months and epilepsy post-discharge (low-certainty evidence). In neonates with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy, treatment of both clinical and electrographic seizures when compared to treating clinical seizures alone may have little or no effect on seizure burden during hospitalisation, all-cause mortality before discharge and epilepsy post-discharge (low-certainty evidence). All findings of this review apply only to term and late preterm neonates. We need well-designed RCTs for each of the three objectives of this review to improve the precision of the results. These RCTs should use EEG to diagnose seizures and should be adequately powered to assess long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. We need separate RCTs evaluating the choice of ASM in preterm infants.

Variable Association of Physiologic Changes With Electrographic Seizure-Like Events in Infants Born Preterm

OBJECTIVES

To determine the incidence of seizure-like events in a cohort of infants born preterm as well as the prevalence of associated vital sign changes (heart rate [HR], respiratory rate, and pulse oximetry [SpO2]).

STUDY DESIGN

We performed prospective conventional video electroencephalogram monitoring on infants born at 23-30 weeks of gestational age during the first 4 postnatal days. For detected seizure-like events, simultaneously captured vital sign data were analyzed during the pre-event baseline and during the event. Significant vital sign changes were defined as HR or respiratory rate >±2 SD from the infant's own baseline physiologic mean, derived from a 10-minute interval before the seizure-like event. Significant change in SpO2 was defined as oxygen desaturation during the event with a mean SpO2 <88%.

RESULTS

Our sample included 48 infants with median gestational age of 28 weeks (IQR 26-29) and birth weight of 1125 g (IQR 963-1265). Twelve (25%) infants had seizure-like discharges with a total of 201 events; 83% (10/12) of infants had vital sign changes during these events, and 50% (6/12) had significant vital sign changes during the majority of the seizure-like events. Concurrent HR changes occurred the most frequently.

CONCLUSIONS

Individual infant variability was observed in the prevalence of concurrent vital sign changes with electroencephalographic seizure-like events. Physiologic changes associated with preterm electrographic seizure-like events should be investigated further as a potential biomarker to assess the clinical significance of such events in the preterm population.

Anti-seizure efficacy of perampanel in two established rodent models of early-life epilepsy

Early-life seizures can be refractory to conventional antiseizure medications (ASMs) and can also result in chronic epilepsy and long-term behavioral and cognitive deficits. Treatments targeting age-specific mechanisms contributing to epilepsy would be of clinical benefit. One such target is the α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor (AMPAR) subtype of excitatory glutamate receptor, which is upregulated in the developing brain. Perampanel is a non-competitive, selective AMPAR antagonist that is FDA-approved for focal onset seizures (FOS) or primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures (PGTC) in children and adults. However, the efficacy of perampanel treatment in epilepsy patients younger than 4 years has been less documented. We thus tested the efficacy of perampanel in two early-life seizure models: (1) a rat model of hypoxia-induced neonatal seizures and (2) a mouse model of Dravet syndrome with hyperthermia-induced seizures. Pretreatment with perampanel conferred dose-dependent protection against early-life seizures in both experimental models. These findings suggest that AMPAR-mediated hyperexcitability could be involved in the pathophysiology of early-life seizures, which may be amenable to treatment with perampanel.

A Comparative Study of Levetiracetam and Phenobarbital for Neonatal Seizures as a First Line Treatment

Objectives

We aimed to evaluate the use of intravenous levetiracetam as the first-line treatment of neonatal seizures compared with phenobarbital.

Methods

The study was conducted on 104 neonates (0-28 days) with clinical seizures after inclusion criteria. They were assigned in equal ratio into 2 groups; 1 included neonates who received phenobarbitone, and the other included neonates who received levetiracetam. Neonates were loaded with 20 mg/kg of intravenous drug-A (phenobarbitone) or drug-B (levetiracetam). In persistent seizures, a second loading dose of the same drug was given. Crossover to other drugs occurred if seizures persisted after the second dose of the same drug. The proportion of neonates who achieved cessation of seizures following the first or second loading dose of either drug-A or drug-B (PB or LEV) was the main outcome measure provided that they remained free of seizure for the following 24 hours.

Results

After 1 or 2 doses of Levetiracatam or Phenobarbitone, clinical seizures stopped (and remained seizure-free for 24 hours) in 41 (78.84%) and 34 (65.38%) patients, respectively (P = .01). Neonates in the LEV group showed better seizure control than neonates in the PB group (RR = 0.57; 95% CI (0.17, 0.80). We did not report any adverse drug reactions in the LEV group. However, 12 (23.07%) neonates developed adverse drug reactions in the PB Group.

Conclusion

Levetiracetam is considered an effective and safe drug as a first-line AED in neonatal seizures.

Bumetanide attenuates sevoflurane-induced neuroapoptosis in the developing dentate gyrus and impaired behavior in the contextual fear discrimination learning test

INTRODUCTION

Sevoflurane acts as a gamma-aminobutyric acid subtype A receptor agonist and can induce widespread apoptosis of immature dentate granule cells in postnatal day 21 mice. The dentate granule cells of postnatal day 21 mice undergo a developmental stage when gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) shifts from inducing the depolarization of neurons to causing hyperpolarization. However, it is unclear whether sevoflurane induces apoptosis of immature granule cells by facilitating the depolarization or hyperpolarization of neurons.

METHODS

We utilized bumetanide, an Na⁺ -K⁺ -2Cl^- cotransporter isoform 1 (NKCC1) antagonist, to determine whether the NKCC1-mediated GABA depolarization of neurons plays a role in sevoflurane-induced neuroapoptosis. We also investigated whether sevoflurane exposure is related to long-term cognitive dysfunction in postnatal day 21 mice and explored the possible protective effects of bumetanide.

RESULTS

Bumetanide attenuated the sevoflurane-induced apoptosis of dentate granule cells in postnatal day 21 mice. Exposure to sevoflurane at postnatal day 21 mice did not affect their motor ability or anxiety level, and it had no effect on spatial learning or memory functions. However, sevoflurane exposure at postnatal day 21 impaired the pattern separation ability in the contextual fear discrimination test; bumetanide mitigated this effect of sevoflurane as well.

CONCLUSION

Bumetanide attenuates sevoflurane-induced apoptosis and is a promising prospect for protecting against anesthesia-induced neurotoxicity in the developing brain.

Neuroprotective therapies in the NICU in term infants: present and future

Outcomes of neonatal encephalopathy (NE) have improved since the widespread implementation of therapeutic hypothermia (TH) in high-resource settings. While TH for NE in term and near-term infants has proven beneficial, 30-50% of infants with moderate-to-severe NE treated with TH still suffer death or significant impairments. There is therefore a critical need to find additional pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions that improve the outcomes for these children. There are many potential candidates; however, it is unclear whether these interventions have additional benefits when used with TH. Although primary and delayed (secondary) brain injury starting in the latent phase after HI are major contributors to neurodisability, the very late evolving effects of tertiary brain injury likely require different interventions targeting neurorestoration. Clinical trials of seizure management and neuroprotection bundles are needed, in addition to current trials combining erythropoietin, stem cells, and melatonin with TH. IMPACT: The widespread use of therapeutic hypothermia (TH) in the treatment of neonatal encephalopathy (NE) has reduced the associated morbidity and mortality. However, 30-50% of infants with moderate-to-severe NE treated with TH still suffer death or significant impairments. This review details the pathophysiology of NE along with the evidence for the use of TH and other beneficial neuroprotective strategies used in term infants. We also discuss treatment strategies undergoing evaluation at present as potential adjuvant treatments to TH in NE.

Neonatal seizures treatment based on conventional multichannel EEG monitoring: an overview of therapeutic options

INTRODUCTION

Seizures are the main neurological emergency during the neonatal period and are mostly acute and focal. The prognosis mainly depends on the underlying etiology. Conventional multichannel video-electroencephalographic (cEEG) monitoring is the gold standard for diagnosis, but treatment remains a challenge.

AREAS COVERED

: This review, based on PubMed search over the last 4 decades, focuses on the current treatment options for neonatal seizures based on cEEG monitoring. There is still no consensus on seizure therapy, owing to poor scientific evidence. Traditionally, the first-line treatments are phenobarbital and phenytoin, followed by midazolam and lidocaine, but their efficacy is limited. Therefore, current evidence strongly suggests the use of alternative antiseizure medications. Randomized controlled trials of new drugs are ongoing.

EXPERT OPINION

: Therapy for neonatal seizures should be prompt and tailored, based on semeiology, mirror of the underlying cause, and cEEG features. Further research should focus on antiseizure medications that directly act on the etiopathogenetic mechanism responsible for seizures and are therefore more effective in seizure control.

Association between anti-seizure medication and outcomes in infants

OBJECTIVE

To compare treatment failure between: (1) infants treated with phenobarbital versus levetiracetam for first-line treatment and (2) infants treated with phenytoin versus levetiracetam for second-line treatment following phenobarbital.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study included infants with seizures receiving phenobarbital or levetiracetam as the initial anti-seizure medication. Treatment failure was defined as the need for additional anti-seizure medication within 24-72 h and compared using mixed-effect logistic regression after adjustment for confounding factors, including center.

RESULTS

In this cohort of 6842 infants, the incidence of treatment failure was 31% vs. 38% in infants receiving first-line phenobarbital versus levetiracetam (adjusted OR: 0.70; 95% CI 0.58-0.84). There was no significant difference in second-line treatment failure (adjusted OR: 1.31; 95% CI 0.92-1.86).

CONCLUSIONS

First-line treatment of neonatal seizures with phenobarbital is associated with a lower rate of treatment failure than levetiracetam. There was no significant difference in second-line treatment failure.

Lumbar Puncture in the prone position for Low Birth Weight Neonates

Background

Lumbar puncture in the lateral decubitus position will make the neonates uncomfortable and is likely to cause position change and unstable vital signs, and the application of sedative drugs will cause adverse effects. This study explored a novel method for lumbar puncture in the prone position for low weight neonates.

Methods

The neonates were randomly assigned into the standard position group receiving lumbar puncture in the lateral decubitus position; and the improved position group receiving lumbar puncture in the prone position. The success rate of first time attempts and the overall success rate of lumbar puncture, incidence of adverse effects, NIAPAS scores were collected and compared between these two groups. The difference in success rate and adverse effects incidence rate was analysed through Chi-square. Student’s t-test was used for the test of NIAPAS rating.

Results

The improved position group had a higher success rate of first attempt and overall success rate, significantly lower incidence of adverse effect and lower NIAPAS scores than those of the standard position group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

This lumbar puncture in the prone position is safer, more effective, and more comfortable for preterm neonates and those with low birth weight. Thus, this method is worth of further promotion.

Trial registration

Registration number, ChiCTR2100049923; Date of Registration, August 11, 2021; Retrospectively registered.

Efficacy and Safety of Levetiracetam vs. Phenobarbital for Neonatal Seizures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Neonatal seizures are a common neurological emergency in newborns. Phenobarbital (PB) is the first-line antiepileptic drug (AED). However, PB has some side effects, such as hypotension and respiratory depression, and it can accelerate neuronal apoptosis in the immature brain. Levetiracetam (LEV), a new antiepileptic drug, has been used as a second-line drug for the treatment of neonatal seizures. Compared with PB, LEV has many advantages, including a low incidence of side effects and better neurodevelopmental outcomes. However, there are only a few systematic reviews of LEV for the treatment of neonatal seizures. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of LEV for neonatal seizures and to compare the efficacy, side effects, and neurological outcomes between LEV and PB in the treatment of neonatal seizures. Methods: The keywords LEV, PB, and neonatal seizure were searched in the MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMBASE, clinicaltrials.gov, and China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI) databases with a last update in July 2021 to collect high-quality studies. We collected studies studying the efficacy or safety of LEV and PB in the treatment of neonatal seizures applying strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. The data were extracted and outcome measures, including efficacy, side effect rate, neurological score, and mortality rate, were analyzed with RevMan 5.3 software. Results: Ten articles were finally included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that there was no difference in efficacy between LEV and PB in the treatment of neonatal seizures. Compared with PB, the incidence of side effects of LEV was lower. The incidence of hypotension and respiratory depression in the LEV group was significantly lower than that in the PB group. In terms of long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes, there was no significant difference in the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID) scores between LEV and PB. Conclusion: PB is still the first-line AED recommended by the WHO for the treatment of neonatal seizures. The new AEDs LEV may not have better efficacy than PB. At the same time, LEV is associated with better neurodevelopment outcomes and a lower risk of adverse effects. In addition, continuous EEG monitoring should be used to diagnose neonatal seizures to evaluate the severity of the seizures, remission, and drug efficacy. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42021279029.

Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interactions among Antiepileptic Drugs, Including CBD, Drugs Used to Treat COVID-19 and Nutrients

Anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) are an important group of drugs of several generations, ranging from the oldest phenobarbital (1912) to the most recent cenobamate (2019). Cannabidiol (CBD) is increasingly used to treat epilepsy. The outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in 2019 created new challenges in the effective treatment of epilepsy in COVID-19 patients. The purpose of this review is to present data from the last few years on drug–drug interactions among of AEDs, as well as AEDs with other drugs, nutrients and food. Literature data was collected mainly in PubMed, as well as google base. The most important pharmacokinetic parameters of the chosen 29 AEDs, mechanism of action and clinical application, as well as their biotransformation, are presented. We pay a special attention to the new potential interactions of the applied first-generation AEDs (carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital and primidone), on decreased concentration of some medications (atazanavir and remdesivir), or their compositions (darunavir/cobicistat and lopinavir/ritonavir) used in the treatment of COVID-19 patients. CBD interactions with AEDs are clearly defined. In addition, nutrients, as well as diet, cause changes in pharmacokinetics of some AEDs. The understanding of the pharmacokinetic interactions of the AEDs seems to be important in effective management of epilepsy.

Assessment of Phenobarbital Administration to Reduce Opioid and Benzodiazepine Use in the Immediate Postoperative Period Following Stage 2 Single-Ventricle Palliation

OBJECTIVE

The Glenn procedure may lead to the development of elevated cerebral venous pressures, which is believed to result in "Glenn headaches." This manifests as excessive irritability, often requiring significant use of opioids and benzodiazepines. This study was designed to report our experience with the use of phenobarbital in the postoperative phase after the Glenn procedure.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review to compare Glenn patients before and after implementation of a sedation protocol using phenobarbital. The 2 groups were compared for demographics, surgical characteristics, and cumulative sedation usage. Correlation coefficients between the preoperative catheterization variables and sedation usage were also calculated.

RESULTS

Groups A (pre-phenobarbital; n = 8) and B (post-phenobarbital; n = 11) were comparable in terms of demographics, cardiac anatomy, preoperative catheterization data, and hemodynamics. Patients in Group B received a median dose of 21.8 mg/kg of phenobarbital during their ICU stay. Although there was a decreased administration of morphine equivalents (2.60 mg/kg vs 2.25 mg/kg, p = 0.38), benzodiazepine (0.1 mg/kg vs 0.074 mg/kg, p = 0.43), and dexmedetomidine (47 mcg/kg vs 37.2 mcg/kg, p = 0.53) in Group B, the differences were not statistically significant. There was also no strong correlation between preoperative hemodynamic variables and the postoperative sedation requirement, and there was no statistically significant difference in overall outcomes between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

While phenobarbital may have mitigated the use of opioids, benzodiazepines, and alpha-agonist agents in some postoperative Glenn patients, the overall findings for all patients were not statistically significant. Further prospective studies are needed to ascertain the role of phenobarbital in these patients.

Management of seizures in neonates with neonatal encephalopathy treated with hypothermia

Neonatal encephalopathy (NE) is the most common etiology of acute neonatal seizures - about half of neonates treated with therapeutic hypothermia for NE have EEG-confirmed seizures. These seizures are best identified with continuous EEG monitoring, as clinical diagnosis leads to under-diagnosis of subclinical seizures and over-treatment of events that are not seizures. High seizure burden, especially status epilepticus, is thought to augment brain injury. Treatment, therefore, is aimed at minimizing seizure burden. Phenobarbital remains the mainstay of treatment, as it is more effective than levetiracetam and easier to administer than fosphenytoin. Emerging evidence suggests that, for many neonates, it is safe to discontinue the phenobarbital after acute seizures resolve and prior to hospital discharge.

Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors suppress seizures in a rat model of birth asphyxia

OBJECTIVE

Seizures are common in neonates recovering from birth asphyxia but there is general consensus that current pharmacotherapy is suboptimal and that novel antiseizure drugs are needed. We recently showed in a rat model of birth asphyxia that seizures are triggered by the post-asphyxia recovery of brain pH. Here our aim was to investigate whether carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAIs), which induce systemic acidosis, block the post-asphyxia seizures.

METHODS

The CAIs acetazolamide (AZA), benzolamide (BZA), and ethoxzolamide (EZA) were administered intraperitoneally or intravenously to 11-day-old rats exposed to intermittent asphyxia (30 min; three 7+3 min cycles of 9% and 5% O₂ at 20% CO₂ ). Electrode measurements of intracortical pH, Po₂ , and local field potentials (LFPs) were made under urethane anesthesia. Convulsive seizures and blood acid-base parameters were examined in freely behaving animals.

RESULTS

The three CAIs decreased brain pH by 0.14-0.17 pH units and suppressed electrographic post-asphyxia seizures. AZA, BZA, and EZA differ greatly in their lipid solubility (EZA > AZA > BZA) and pharmacokinetics. However, there were only minor differences in the delay (range 0.8-3.7 min) from intraperitoneal application to their action on brain pH. The CAIs induced a modest post-asphyxia elevation of brain Po₂ that had no effect on LFP activity. AZA was tested in freely behaving rats, in which it induced a respiratory acidosis and decreased the incidence of convulsive seizures from 9 of 20 to 2 of 17 animals.

SIGNIFICANCE

AZA, BZA, and EZA effectively block post-asphyxia seizures. Despite the differences in their pharmacokinetics, they had similar effects on brain pH, which indicates that their antiseizure mode of action was based on respiratory (hypercapnic) acidosis resulting from inhibition of blood-borne and extracellular vascular carbonic anhydrases. AZA has been used for several indications in neonates, suggesting that it can be safely repurposed for the treatment of neonatal seizures as an add-on to the current treatment regimen.

Rapid infusion of excessive phenytoin: A newborn autopsy case

The patient was a two-day-old female infant. The patient's mother was a primigravid in her 20 s who developed premature abruption of the normal placenta on the first day of the 33rd week of gestation. The infant was born by emergency cesarean section with severe neonatal asphyxia with a birth weight of 1928 g. Spontaneous circulation was returned 11 min after birth. The infant was treated under mechanical ventilation in the neonatal intensive care unit, and phenobarbital was administered for repeated seizures. On day 2, spontaneous respiration was observed; however, the patient developed seizures repeatedly. The dose of phenobarbital reached the maximum and was switched to midazolam. In the early morning of day 3, while midazolam was administered up to the maximum dose, the infant developed status epilepticus, and the anticonvulsant drug was changed to phenytoin. Due to a calculation error, the intravenous administration of phenytoin was started at 400 mg/30 min, which is 10-fold of the normal dose. Six minutes later, after 80 mg was administered, the administration was stopped due to a drop in blood pressure; however, the infant died of cardiac arrest. An autopsy, which was performed approximately 25 h after death, revealed the blood phenytoin concentration in the heart was 63.85 μg/mL. The cause of death was determined to be acute phenytoin toxicity. This is the first fatal case reported of the blood concentration of phenytoin caused by rapid intravenous administration.

Neonatal Antiepileptic Medication Treatment Patterns: A Decade of Change

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to describe the frequency and characteristics of anticonvulsant medication treatments initiated in the neonatal period.

STUDY DESIGN

We analyzed a cohort of neonates with a seizure diagnosis who were discharged from institutions in the Pediatric Health Information System between 2007 and 2016. Adjusted risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals for characteristics associated with neonatal (≤ 28 days postnatal) anticonvulsant initiation were calculated via modified Poisson regression.

RESULTS

A total of 6,245 infants from 47 institutions were included. There was a decrease in both phenobarbital initiation within the neonatal period (96.9 to 91.3%, p = 0.015) and continuation at discharge (90.6 to 68.6%, p <0.001). Levetiracetam (7.9 to 39.6%, p < 0.001) initiation within the neonatal period and continuation at discharge (9.4 to 49.8%, p < 0.001) increased. Neonates born at ≥ 37 weeks' gestation and those diagnosed with intraventricular hemorrhage, ischemic/thrombotic stroke, other hemorrhagic stroke, and hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) had a higher probability of anticonvulsant administration. The most prevalent diagnosis was HIE (n = 2,223, 44.4%).

CONCLUSION

Phenobarbital remains the most widely used neonatal seizure treatment. Levetiracetam is increasingly used as a second line therapy. Increasing levetiracetam use indicates a need for additional study to determine its effectiveness in reducing seizure burden and improving long-term outcomes.

What is the Best Predictor of Phenobarbital Pharmacokinetics to Use for Initial Dosing in Neonates?

Phenobarbital is a first-line treatment of various seizure types in newborns. Dosage individualization maximizing the proportion of patients with drug levels in therapeutic range or sufficient treatment response is still challenging. The aim of this review was to summarize the available evidence on phenobarbital pharmacokinetics in neonates and to identify its possible covariates suitable for individualization of initial drug dosing. Several covariates have been considered: body weight and height, body surface area, gestational and postnatal age, laboratory parameters of renal and hepatic functions, asphyxia, therapeutic hypothermia, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), drug interactions, and genetic polymorphisms. The most frequently studied and well-founded covariate for the estimation of phenobarbital dosing is actual body weight. Loading dose of 15-20 mg/kg followed by a maintenance dose of 3-5 mg/kg/day seems to be accurate. However, the evidence for the other covariates with respect to dosing individualization is not sufficient. Doses at the lower limit of suggested range should be preferred in patients with severe asphyxia, while the upper limit of the range should be targeted in neonates receiving ECMO support.

Neonatal Seizures Revisited

Seizures are the most common neurological disorder in newborns and are most prevalent in the neonatal period. They are mostly caused by severe disorders of the central nervous system (CNS). However, they can also be a sign of the immaturity of the infant’s brain, which is characterized by the presence of specific factors that increase excitation and reduce inhibition. The most common disorders which result in acute brain damage and can manifest as seizures in neonates include hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, infections of the CNS as well as electrolyte and biochemical disturbances. The therapeutic management of neonates and the prognosis are different depending on the etiology of the disorders that cause seizures which can lead to death or disability. Therefore, establishing a prompt diagnosis and implementing appropriate treatment are significant, as they can limit adverse long-term effects and improve outcomes. In this review paper, we present the latest reports on the etiology, pathomechanism, clinical symptoms and guidelines for the management of neonates with acute symptomatic seizures.

Efficacy and Safety of Phenobarbitone as First-Line Treatment for Neonatal Seizure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Phenobarbitone is used as a first-line drug for neonatal seizures. However, its poor short- and long-term safety profile is concerning. We aim to systematically synthesize the data on the efficacy and safety of phenobarbitone as a first-line agent and compare it against other anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) in neonates.

METHODS

Using keywords related to the study population (neonatal seizure) and intervention (phenobarbitone), we searched CENTRAL, Embase, PubMed and Web of Science until 15 December 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing phenobarbitone with any other AED as first-line therapy for seizure control in the neonates were considered eligible. The random-effect meta-analysis was done using RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

We screened through 443 records and identified nine eligible studies (719 participants). Five RCTs comparing phenobarbitone with levetiracetam did not find any difference in seizure control with the first dose [risk ratio (RR) 1.43, 95% CI 0.79-2.57] or adverse effects (RR 4.66; 95% CI 0.33-65.83). Two trials comparing phenobarbitone and phenytoin also did not find any difference in seizure control with the first dose (RR 2.09; 95% CI 0.31-14.03) and other outcomes. Only one RCT compared phenobarbitone and lorazepam and found lorazepam to be more efficacious in seizure control with the first dose (RR 0.71; 95% CI 0.53-0.94). Three trials compared neurodevelopmental outcomes, in which levetiracetam was better in two, whereas one did not find any difference.

CONCLUSION

Phenobarbitone is at least as efficacious and safe as other drugs like phenytoin and levetiracetam. The data over the long-term neurodevelopmental outcome are lacking. The existing evidence is insufficient to recommend other drugs over phenobarbitone.

"The First Thousand Days" Define a Fetal/Neonatal Neurology Program

Gene-environment interactions begin at conception to influence maternal/placental/fetal triads, neonates, and children with short- and long-term effects on brain development. Life-long developmental neuroplasticity more likely results during critical/sensitive periods of brain maturation over these first 1,000 days. A fetal/neonatal program (FNNP) applying this perspective better identifies trimester-specific mechanisms affecting the maternal/placental/fetal (MPF) triad, expressed as brain malformations and destructive lesions. Maladaptive MPF triad interactions impair progenitor neuronal/glial populations within transient embryonic/fetal brain structures by processes such as maternal immune activation. Destructive fetal brain lesions later in pregnancy result from ischemic placental syndromes associated with the great obstetrical syndromes. Trimester-specific MPF triad diseases may negatively impact labor and delivery outcomes. Neonatal neurocritical care addresses the symptomatic minority who express the great neonatal neurological syndromes: encephalopathy, seizures, stroke, and encephalopathy of prematurity. The asymptomatic majority present with neurologic disorders before 2 years of age without prior detection. The developmental principle of ontogenetic adaptation helps guide the diagnostic process during the first 1,000 days to identify more phenotypes using systems-biology analyses. This strategy will foster innovative interdisciplinary diagnostic/therapeutic pathways, educational curricula, and research agenda among multiple FNNP. Effective early-life diagnostic/therapeutic programs will help reduce neurologic disease burden across the lifespan and successive generations.

Neurologic Emergencies at the Extremes of Age

The diagnosis and management of neurologic conditions are more complex at the extremes of age than in the average adult. In the pediatric population, neurologic emergencies are somewhat rare and some may require emergent consultation. In older adults, geriatric physiologic changes with increased comorbidities leads to atypical presentations and worsened outcomes. The unique considerations regarding emergency department presentation and management of stroke and altered mental status in both age groups is discussed, in addition to seizures and intracranial hemorrhage in pediatrics, and Parkinson's disease and meningitis in the geriatric population.

Acute symptomatic neonatal seizures, brain injury, and long-term outcome: The role of neuroprotective strategies

INTRODUCTION

Neonatal seizures are frequent but underdiagnosed manifestations of acute brain dysfunction and an important contributor to unfavorable outcomes. Etiology and severity of brain injury are the single strongest outcome determinants.

AREAS COVERED

The authors will discuss the prognostic role of acute symptomatic seizures versus brain injury and the main neuroprotective and neurorestorative strategies for full-term and preterm infants.

EXPERT OPINION

Prolonged acute symptomatic seizures likely contribute to long-term outcomes by independently adding further brain injury to initial insults. Correct timing and dosing of therapeutic interventions, depending on etiology and gestational ages, need careful evaluation. Although promising strategies are under study, the only standard of care is whole-body therapeutic hypothermia in full-term newborns with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.

Efficacy of Levetiracetam in neonatal seizures: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Neonatal seizures represent the most frequent presenting sign of any neurological abnormality secondary to various etiologies in the neonatal period. Phenobarbitone (PB) has been used as first-line anti-epileptic drug in the treatment of seizures but concerns have been raised regarding its neuro-apoptotic effects over the developing brain. Levetiracetam (LEV) is a newer anti-epileptic drug with neuroprotective property and has been used in adults and pediatric patient but its use in neonates have very limited experience. Recently many neonatal studies have sought the role of LEV in the management of neonatal seizures.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of Levetiracetam in the management of neonatal seizures.

SEARCH METHODS

The literature search was done for this systematic review by searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and other various electronic databases including PubMed and various sites for ongoing trials and abstracts of conferences.

RESULTS

Two eligible studies were analyzed that fulfilled the inclusion criteria of the systematic review. Fifteen studies were excluded due to the non-fulfillment of inclusion criteria. The primary outcome of both studies was to see the efficiency of LEV in controlling neonatal seizures when compared to PB. Better seizure control after a single loading dose of LEV was seen. Rates of seizure cessation at 24 h was also better in the LEV arm. Neonatal seizures secondary to hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) and receiving therapeutic hypothermia were better controlled with LEV. The side effect of LEV was significantly less when compared to PB.

CONCLUSION

Levetiracetam has shown to have promising anti-epileptic properties for the management of neonatal seizure with better efficacy and less or no side effects. There is a need to conduct more randomized controlled trials seeking the role of LEV in the acute management of neonatal seizures and also for assessing its neuroprotective role and neurodevelopmental outcome in these neonates.

High-Dose Levetiracetam for Neonatal Seizures: A Retrospective Review

BACKGROUND

Neonatal seizures are frequently encountered in the neonatal intensive care unit and may be associated with serious long-term neurological sequelae. Response to treatment continues to be modest, and treatment guidelines remain unclear. The use of levetiracetam has been on the rise in the past several years due to its favorable safety profile in the face of limited data on its efficacy and optimal dosing regimens. Unlike the older age groups, the benefit of escalating to high-dose levetiracetam of 80-100 mg/kg/day in neonates not responding to the standard used dosing regimen (40-60 mg/kg/day) is not studied. We sought to investigate the safety and efficacy of levetiracetam escalation to high dose regimens for neonatal seizures.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review over a 7-year period was conducted at the American University of Beirut to identify neonates with electrographically proven seizures treated with levetiracetam. Data was collected on electroclinical seizure characteristics, underlying etiology, seizure control, other anti-seizure medications, and adverse effects.

RESULTS

Electronic chart review revealed a total of 15 neonates with electrographically confirmed seizures treated with levetiracetam, with escalation to high doses in seven. As a first line drug, levetiracetam monotherapy terminated seizures in six out 10 neonates, two of whom had complete seizure cessation only after escalation to high doses of 80 or 100 mg/kg/day. When used in combination with other anti-seizure medications, four out of five neonates achieved complete seizure cessation upon escalation to high doses of levetiracetam. No adverse effects were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

In neonates not responding to the standard used levetiracetam doses, incremental increases to 80-100 mg/kg/day may be considered. Prospective studies are needed to confirm the promising role of such high dosing regimens, and to better elucidate the role of levetiracetam in neonatal seizures.

Evaluation of Two Fosphenytoin Loading Dose Regimens and Monitoring in Infants and Neonates Less Than Six Months of Age

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of the study were to compare the free serum concentrations after different fosphenytoin loading dose strategies in patients younger than 6 months old and to investigate the frequency of seizure cessation following a loading dose of fosphenytoin.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included neonates and infants admitted to a 150-bed children's hospital between August 1, 2014, and February 1, 2018. Patients were included if they were younger than 6 months old and had a postload free phenytoin serum concentration collected during the specified time frame. Patients were identified through a database query screening for the inclusion criteria. Patients were separated into 2 groups with the 15 mg/kg group as per protocol and the 20 mg/kg group as noted in common practice. Data collection included demographic information, fosphenytoin dose, time of administration of the fosphenytoin loading dose, time of sampling, free phenytoin serum concentration results, concomitant antiepileptic agents, albumin serum concentration, and total bilirubin serum concentration.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients were included for analysis, 12 in the 15 mg/kg group and 29 in the 20 mg/kg group. The average free phenytoin concentration after the loading dose was 2.45 ± 0.54 mg/L in the 15 mg/kg group and 2.52 ± 0.66 mg/L in the 20 mg/kg group. Seizure cessation after the fosphenytoin loading dose was achieved in 3 of 12 (25%) patients in the 15 mg/kg group and in 13 of 29 (45%) patients in the 20 mg/kg group (p = 0.305).

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrates that a traditional range of fosphenytoin loading dose (15-20 mg/kg) led to elevated postloading dose free phenytoin serum concentrations in the majority of patients with a seizure cessation rate of approximately 39%. The question remains as to what the optimal dose and target concentration should be in this patient population to achieve the best efficacy without risking associated toxicities.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Is a Feasible Tool to Personalize Drug Administration in Neonates Using New Techniques: An Overview on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Neonatal Age

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) should be adopted in all neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), where the most preterm and fragile babies are hospitalized and treated with many drugs, considering that organs and metabolic pathways undergo deep and progressive maturation processes after birth. Different developmental changes are involved in interindividual variability in response to drugs. A crucial point of TDM is the choice of the bioanalytical method and of the sample to use. TDM in neonates is primarily used for antibiotics, antifungals, and antiepileptic drugs in clinical practice. TDM appears to be particularly promising in specific populations: neonates who undergo therapeutic hypothermia or extracorporeal life support, preterm infants, infants who need a tailored dose of anticancer drugs. This review provides an overview of the latest advances in this field, showing options for a personalized therapy in newborns and infants.

Neuroprotective Effects of Lacosamide and Memantine on Hyperoxic Brain Injury in Rats

In neonates supraphysiological oxygen therapy has been demonstrated to cause neuronal death in hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, parietal cortex, and retrosplenial cortex. There is a need for the detection of novel neuroprotective drugs. Neuroprotective effects of lacosamide or memantine have been demonstrated in adult patients with ischemia, trauma and status epilepticus. The effects in immature brains may be different. This study aimed to evaluate neuroprotective effects of lacosamide and memantine treatment in a hyperoxia-induced brain injury model in immature rats. This study was performed in the Animal Experiments Laboratory of Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine. Neonatal Wistar strain rat pups were exposed to hyperoxia (80% oxygen + 20% nitrogen) for five days postnatally. They were divided into five groups; hyperoxia + lacosamide, hyperoxia + memantine, hyperoxia + lacosamide and memantine, hyperoxia + saline, control groups. After termination of the experiment, brain tissues were examined. Neuron counting in examined regions were found to be higher in hyperoxia + memantine and hyperoxia + lacosamide and memantine groups than hyperoxia + saline group. The presence of apoptotic cells evaluated with TUNEL and active Caspase-3 in hyperoxia + memantine and hyperoxia + lacosamide and memantine groups were found to be lower compared to hyperoxia + saline group. This study demonstrates that neuron death and apoptosis in newborn rat brains after hyperoxia is reduced upon memantine treatment. This is the first study to show the effects of memantine and lacosamide on hyperoxia-induced damage in neonatal rat brains.

Management of Multi Organ Dysfunction in Neonatal Encephalopathy

Neonatal Encephalopathy (NE) describes neonates with disturbed neurological function in the first post-natal days of life. NE is an overall term that does not specify the etiology of the encephalopathy although it often involves hypoxia-ischaemia. In NE, although neurological dysfunction is part of the injury and is most predictive of long-term outcome, these infants may also have multiorgan injury and compromise, which further contribute to neurological impairment and long-term morbidities. Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) is the standard of care for moderate to severe NE. Infants with NE may have co-existing immune, respiratory, endocrine, renal, hepatic, and cardiac dysfunction that require individualized management and can be impacted by TH. Non-neurological organ dysfunction not only has a negative effect on long term outcome but may also influence the efficacy of treatments in the acute phase. Post resuscitative care involves stabilization and decisions regarding TH and management of multi-organ dysfunction. This management includes detailed neurological assessment, cardio-respiratory stabilization, glycaemic and fluid control, sepsis evaluation and antibiotics, seizure identification, and monitoring and responding to biochemical and coagulation derangements. The emergence of new biomarkers of specific organ injury may have predictive value and improve the definition of organ injury and prognosis. Further evidence-based research is needed to optimize management of NE, prevent further organ dysfunction and reduce neurodevelopmental impairment.

Efficacy of antiepileptic drugs in neonatal seizures: a systematic review protocol

INTRODUCTION

Seizures are one of the most common neurological disorders of neonates, which is also an emergency in the neonatal intensive care unit. For neonates, the recommended first-line antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) include phenobarbitone, which may be effective in only 50% of seizures. Some new AEDs, such as levetiracetam, have been shown to be effective in adults and older children. However, their efficacy for neonatal seizures remains uncertain. The aim of this investigation is to conduct a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy of all AEDs in neonates. Additionally, the long-term outcomes following neonatal seizures, in relation to the development of cerebral palsy and epilepsy, will be studied.

METHOD

We will perform a systematic review including randomised controlled studies (RCTs), cohort studies, case-controlled studies and case series studies which evaluated the efficacy of AEDs and short-term and long-term outcomes in neonatal seizures. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Clinical trial.gov will be searched. There will be no language restriction. Risk bias in RCTs will be evaluated by the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, while cohort and case-control studies will be evaluated by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A network meta-analysis will be performed by the Bayesian model using WinBUGS V.1.4.3 and R software if there is a high degree of homogeneity among studies. Otherwise, we will perform a narrative review without pooling. Subgroup analyses will be performed in different AEDs and dosage groups.

OUTCOME

The primary outcomes will be seizure cessation confirmed by electroencephalogram and long-term neurodevelopmental outcome. Secondary outcomes will be neonatal mortality during hospitalisation and suspected drug toxicity.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Formal ethical approval is not required as no primary data are collected. This systematic review will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication.

Pharmacotherapy for Pediatric Convulsive Status Epilepticus

Convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) is one of the most common pediatric neurological emergencies. Ongoing seizure activity is a dynamic process and may be associated with progressive impairment of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-mediated inhibition due to rapid internalization of GABA_A receptors. Further hyperexcitability may be caused by AMPA (alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid) and NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartic acid) receptors moving from subsynaptic sites to the synaptic membrane. Receptor trafficking during prolonged seizures may contribute to difficulties treating seizures of longer duration and may provide some of the pathophysiological underpinnings of established and refractory SE (RSE). Simultaneously, a practice change toward more rapid initiation of first-line benzodiazepine (BZD) treatment and faster escalation to second-line non-BZD treatment for established SE is in progress. Early administration of the recommended BZD dose is suggested. For second-line treatment, non-BZD anti-seizure medications (ASMs) include valproate, fosphenytoin, or levetiracetam, among others, and at this point there is no clear evidence that any one of these options is better than the others. If seizures continue after second-line ASMs, RSE is manifested. RSE treatment consists of bolus doses and titration of continuous infusions under continuous electro-encephalography (EEG) guidance until electrographic seizure cessation or burst-suppression. Ultimately, etiological workup and related treatment of CSE, including broad spectrum immunotherapies as clinically indicated, is crucial. A potential therapeutic approach for future studies may entail consideration of interventions that may accelerate diagnosis and treatment of SE, as well as rational and early polytherapy based on synergism between ASMs by utilizing medications targeting different mechanisms of epileptogenesis and epileptogenicity.

Use of sorbitol as pharmaceutical excipient in the present day formulations - issues and challenges for drug absorption and bioavailability

Sorbitol is a popular sugar alcohol which has been used as an excipient in formulations of various drugs. Although from a safety perspective the presence of sorbitol in drug formulations does not raise a concern, reports have emerged and these suggest that sorbitol in drug formulations may alter oral absorption and bioavailability of certain drugs. The focus of this article was to review the published literature of various drugs where pharmacokinetic data has been reported for the drug alone versus drug administered with sorbitol and provide perspectives on the pharmacokinetic findings. Interestingly, for BCS class I drugs such as theophylline, metoprolol, the oral absorption, and bioavailability were generally not affected by sorbitol. However, theophylline oral absorption and bioavailability were decreased when sustained release formulation was used in place of immediate release formulation. For drugs such as risperidone (BCS class II) and lamivudine and ranitidine (BCS class III), the solution formulations showed diminished oral bioavailability in presence of sorbitol, whereas cimetidine and acyclovir (BCS class III), did not show any changes in pharmacokinetic profiles due to sorbitol. Finally, the presence of activated charcoal with sorbitol showed different pharmacokinetic outcome for BCS class I and II drugs.

Cardiac Collapse Secondary to Phenytoin Toxicity in a Neonate Treated with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support (ECMO)

INTRODUCTION

Although medication toxicity is uncommon in neonates, there are several medications used in this population that pose a risk. Phenytoin has an increased risk of toxicity given its narrow therapeutic window and variations in drug elimination.

CASE REPORT

We describe the case of a 3-day-old male infant who developed cardiovascular collapse secondary to severe phenytoin toxicity (max phenytoin level 86 μg/mL) and was placed on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support (ECMO). Several ancillary treatments were utilized in an attempt to decrease serum phenytoin concentrations and limit toxicity including albumin boluses, phenobarbital administration, intravenous lipid infusion, and folic acid supplementation.

DISCUSSION

Although uncommon, drug toxicity should be considered in patients with acute changes who are exposed to medications with potential toxicity. With elevated levels of phenytoin, the half-life can be prolonged resulting in longer exposure to elevated levels of the drug as seen in our patient. This case report highlights the importance of ECMO utilization for cardiac support in neonates with medication toxicity and other potential ancillary treatments to decrease serum phenytoin concentrations.

Novel interventions to reduce oxidative-stress related brain injury in neonatal asphyxia

Perinatal asphyxia-induced brain injury may present as hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in the neonatal period, and disability including cerebral palsy in the long term. The brain injury is secondary to both the hypoxic-ischemic event and the reoxygenation-reperfusion following resuscitation. Early events in the cascade of brain injury can be classified as either inflammation or oxidative stress through the generation of free radicals. The objective of this paper is to present efforts that have been made to limit the oxidative stress associated with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. In the acute phase of ischemia/hypoxia and reperfusion/reoxygenation, the outcomes of asphyxiated infants can be improved by optimizing the initial delivery room stabilization. Interventions include limiting oxygen exposure, and shortening the time to return of spontaneous circulation through improved methods for supporting hemodynamics and ventilation. Allopurinol, melatonin, noble gases such as xenon and argon, and magnesium administration also target the acute injury phase. Therapeutic hypothermia, N-acetylcysteine2-iminobiotin, remote ischemic postconditioning, cannabinoids and doxycycline target the subacute phase. Erythropoietin, mesenchymal stem cells, topiramate and memantine could potentially limit injury in the repair phase after asphyxia. To limit the injurious biochemical processes during the different stages of brain injury, determination of the stage of injury in any particular infant remains essential. Currently, therapeutic hypothermia is the only established treatment in the subacute phase of asphyxia-induced brain injury. The effects and side effects of oxidative stress reducing/limiting medications may however be difficult to predict in infants during therapeutic hypothermia. Future neuroprotection in asphyxiated infants may indeed include a combination of therapies. Challenges include timing, dosing and administration route for each neuroprotectant.

Brain Activity and Cerebral Oxygenation After Perinatal Arterial Ischemic Stroke Are Associated With Neurodevelopment

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

In infants with perinatal arterial ischemic stroke (PAIS), early prognosis of neurodevelopmental outcome is important to adequately inform parents and caretakers. Early continuous neuromonitoring after PAIS may improve early prognosis. Our aim was to study early cerebral electrical activity and oxygenation measured by amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) and near-infrared spectroscopy in term neonates with PAIS and relate these to the development of cerebral palsy and cognitive deficit.

Overexpression of phosphoprotein enriched in astrocytes 15 reverses the damage induced by propofol in hippocampal neurons

Propofol is a general anesthetic used in surgical operations. Phosphoprotein enriched in astrocytes 15(PEA15) was initially identified in astrocytes. The present study examined the role of PEA15 in the damage induced by propofol in hippocampal neurons. A model of hippocampal neuron damage was established using 50 µmol/l propofol. Cell viability, proliferation and apoptosis of hippocampal neurons were tested by Cell Counting Kit‑8 and flow cytometry. Western blotting and reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis were performed to measure the expression levels of PEA15, and additional factors involved in apoptosis or in the signaling pathway downstream of PEA15. The present results suggested that propofol significantly decreased PEA15 expression levels in hippocampal neurons. Furthermore, overexpression of PEA15 significantly increased the cell viability and cell proliferation of cells treated with propofol. Additionally, PEA15 overexpression decreased apoptosis, which was promoted by propofol. Treatment with propofol significantly decreased the protein expression levels of pro‑caspase‑3, B‑cell lymphoma-2, phosphorylated extracellular signal‑regulated kinases (ERK)1/2, ribosomal S6 kinase 2 (RSK2) and phosphorylated cAMP responsive element binding protein 1 (CREB1). However, propofol upregulated active caspase‑3 and Bax expression levels. Notably, PEA15 overexpression was able to reverse the effects of propofol. Collectively, overexpression of PEA15 was able to attenuate the neurotoxicity of propofol in rat hippocampal neurons by increasing proliferation and repressing apoptosis via upregulation of the ERK‑CREB‑RSK2 signaling pathway.

Short-Term Neurodevelopmental Outcome in Term Neonates Treated with Phenobarbital versus Levetiracetam: A Single-Center Experience

Background

Phenobarbital (PB) has been traditionally used as the first-line treatment for neonatal seizures. More recently, levetiracetam (LEV) has been increasingly used as a promising newer antiepileptic medication for treatment of seizures in neonates.

Objectives

The aim of our study was to compare the effect of PB vs. LEV on short-term neurodevelopmental outcome in infants treated for neonatal seizures.

Method

This randomized, one-blind prospective study was conducted on term neonates admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of S. Bambino Hospital, University Hospital "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele," Catania, Italy, from February 2016 to February 2018. Thirty term neonates with seizures were randomized to receive PB or LEV; the Hammersmith Neonatal Neurological Examination (HNNE) was used at baseline (T0) and again one month after the initial treatment (T1).

Results

We found a significantly positive HNNE score for the developmental outcomes, specifically tone and posture, in neonates treated with LEV. There was no significant improvement in the HNNE score at T1 in the neonates treated with PB.

Conclusion

This study suggests a positive effect of levetiracetam on tone and posture in term newborns treated for neonatal seizures. If future randomized-controlled studies also show better efficacy of LEV in the treatment of neonatal seizures, LEV might potentially be considered as the first-line anticonvulsant in this age group.

Recommendations for the design of therapeutic trials for neonatal seizures

Although seizures have a higher incidence in neonates than any other age group and are associated with significant mortality and neurodevelopmental disability, treatment is largely guided by physician preference and tradition, due to a lack of data from well-designed clinical trials. There is increasing interest in conducting trials of novel drugs to treat neonatal seizures, but the unique characteristics of this disorder and patient population require special consideration with regard to trial design. The Critical Path Institute formed a global working group of experts and key stakeholders from academia, the pharmaceutical industry, regulatory agencies, neonatal nurse associations, and patient advocacy groups to develop consensus recommendations for design of clinical trials to treat neonatal seizures. The broad expertise and perspectives of this group were invaluable in developing recommendations addressing: (1) use of neonate-specific adaptive trial designs, (2) inclusion/exclusion criteria, (3) stratification and randomization, (4) statistical analysis, (5) safety monitoring, and (6) definitions of important outcomes. The guidelines are based on available literature and expert consensus, pharmacokinetic analyses, ethical considerations, and parental concerns. These recommendations will ultimately facilitate development of a Master Protocol and design of efficient and successful drug trials to improve the treatment and outcome for this highly vulnerable population.

Research on medication use in the neonatal intensive care unit

INTRODUCTION

Research on medication use aims at assessing how much of current pharmacotherapy is rational. In neonates, this is hampered by extensive off-label drug use and limited knowledge. Areas covered: We report on medication use research and have conducted a systematic review of observational studies on medication use to provide an updated overview on characteristics, objectives, methods, and patterns in hospitalized neonates. Moreover, a review on aspects of medication use for opioids, anti-epileptics, gastric acid-related disorders and respiratory stimulants with emphasis on trends and impact of interventions is presented, illustrating how research on medication use can contribute to improved neonatal pharmacotherapy and more focused research. Medication use reports describe patterns and provide signals on irrational use, benchmarking, or can guide research priorities. Moreover, this may generate information on how neonatal health topics and their pharmacotherapy are handled over time or across regions. Expert opinion: Research on medicine utilization is relevant, since it will inform us on aspects like trends, variability, or about the impact and pattern of implementation of guidelines in neonates. Further progress necessitates to merge datasets on medication use with clinical characteristics, and perinatal drug use remains an area in need of additional research.

Phenobarbital, Midazolam Pharmacokinetics, Effectiveness, and Drug-Drug Interaction in Asphyxiated Neonates Undergoing Therapeutic Hypothermia

BACKGROUND

Phenobarbital and midazolam are commonly used drugs in (near-)term neonates treated with therapeutic hypothermia for hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy, for sedation, and/or as anti-epileptic drug. Phenobarbital is an inducer of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A, while midazolam is a CYP3A substrate. Therefore, co-treatment with phenobarbital might impact midazolam clearance.

OBJECTIVES

To assess pharmacokinetics and clinical anti-epileptic effectiveness of phenobarbital and midazolam in asphyxiated neonates and to develop dosing guidelines.

METHODS

Data were collected in the prospective multicentre PharmaCool study. In the present study, neonates treated with therapeutic hypothermia and receiving midazolam and/or phenobarbital were included. Plasma concentrations of phenobarbital and midazolam including its metabolites were determined in blood samples drawn on days 2-5 after birth. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed using non-linear mixed effects modelling; clinical effectiveness was defined as no use of additional anti-epileptic drugs.

RESULTS

Data were available from 113 (phenobarbital) and 118 (midazolam) neonates; 68 were treated with both medications. Only clearance of 1-hydroxy midazolam was influenced by hypothermia. Phenobarbital co-administration increased midazolam clearance by a factor 2.3 (95% CI 1.9-2.9, p < 0.05). Anticonvulsant effectiveness was 65.5% for phenobarbital and 37.1% for add-on midazolam.

CONCLUSIONS

Therapeutic hypothermia does not influence clearance of phenobarbital or midazolam in (near-)term neonates with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy. A phenobarbital dose of 30 mg/kg is advised to reach therapeutic concentrations. Phenobarbital co-administration significantly increased midazolam clearance. Should phenobarbital be substituted by non-CYP3A inducers as first-line anticonvulsant, a 50% lower midazolam maintenance dose might be appropriate to avoid excessive exposure during the first days after birth.