Quality improvement for NICU graduates: Feasible, relevant, impactful

Evaluating Prevalence of Preterm Postnatal Growth Faltering Using Fenton 2013 and INTERGROWTH-21st Growth Charts with Logistic and Machine Learning Models

Background/Objectives: Postnatal growth faltering (PGF) significantly affects premature neonates, leading to compromised neurodevelopment and an increased risk of long-term health complications. Methods: This retrospective study at a level III NICU of a tertiary hospital analyzed 650 preterm neonates born before 33 weeks. Postnatal growth was evaluated using the Fenton2013 and INTERGROWTH-21st growth charts, with changes in weight z-scores from birth to discharge classified as normal growth (ΔZ ≥ -1), non-severe PGF (-2 ≤ ΔZ < -1), and severe PGF (ΔZ < -2). Results: Mean gestational and postmenstrual age at discharge was 30 weeks (SD 1.9) and 37.1 weeks (SD 2.7), respectively. Fenton2013 growth curves revealed a higher prevalence of non-severe and severe PGF (43% and 14.6%) compared to INTERGROWTH-21st (24.5% and 10.3%). A more rapid establishment of full enteral feeds was strongly associated with reduced severe PGF prevalence in both growth charts (p < 0.001), as was shorter hospitalization. Late-onset sepsis was associated with an increased risk of severe PGF, while being small for gestational age (SGA) was protective against severe PGF across both growth charts (p < 0.001). A trend of decreasing PGF prevalence was noted over the study years, most probably attributed to the implementation of updated nutritional guidelines. Interestingly, when machine learning classification models were evaluated in our Greek cohort, a notable decline in predictive accuracy depending on the growth standard applied was observed. Conclusions: Our study highlights the need for standardizing PGF definition in an attempt to enhance nutritional management and further investigate the long-term impacts of nutritional interventions on growth, neurodevelopment, and overall health outcomes.

Loss to Follow-up and Developmental Delay in the Neonatal High-Risk Infant Follow-up Clinic

Neonatal follow-up (NFU) clinics provide developmental assessments for infants at high risk for developmental delays. Disparities in NFU attendance and loss to follow-up (LTF) are well documented, but it is not known whether patients who are LTF have different developmental outcomes. The population of patients LTF from the NFU clinic is assumed to be homogenous, but we hypothesize there is a subpopulation of patients LTF who are receiving developmental care elsewhere. Our objective was to compare the baseline characteristics and developmental outcomes of infants who completed follow-up, infants who were LTF but seen by others in the community, and infants who were LTF but not seen by others (true LTF).Retrospective cohort study at a regional specialty center, including 262 patients referred to the NFU clinic who were born between 2014 and 2017, with a 24-month total follow-up period, such that assessment of all follow-up outcomes (NFU clinic attendance outcome, and clinician assessed developmental delay) was complete prior to March 2020. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model the odds of developmental delay, true LTF, and referral to developmental services at initial hospital discharge.Of 262 patients, 86 (33%) were LTF from the NFU clinic. Of these, 55 (64%) had developmental assessments by other providers. Of those LTFs from NFU but seen by other providers, the prevalence of clinician-assessed developmental delay at 24 months was 67%, compared with 45% of those who completed the NFU clinic (p < 0.001). Social risk factors (younger mothers, late or no prenatal care, maternal smoking, or referral for a social reason) were associated with higher odds of true LTF, but no different odds of referral to developmental services at hospital discharge.A majority of patients LTF from the NFU clinic had developmental assessments by others (64%). Social risk factors were associated with true LTF and missed developmental assessments. · Sixty-four percent of patients with LTF had developmental assessments by other providers.. · Social risk factors were associated with higher odds of true LTF.. · Infants with social risk factors were not referred to developmental services early..

NICU Parent and Staff Advocacy to Address Parental Mental Health

Parents of infants requiring neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) hospitalization often experience increased rates of distress, trauma, and perinatal mood disorders. Untreated parental mental health conditions have short- and long-term effects for infants and families. While some NICUs provide varying degrees of mental health supports for NICU families, these services are not universally or systematically integrated in US NICUs. Multiple factors contribute to this gap in care, including mental health stigma, funding constraints, and lack of staff training and capacity. In an effort to address this gap, we used a participatory action research approach, guided by a Patient and Stakeholder Engagement model, to partner with graduate NICU parents and patient-facing NICU staff to identify parental mental health needs and ideas to address them. Through efforts to mitigate power differentials and engage parents as research and program development partners, our work shaped NICU practices, programming, and subsequent research.

Ensuring Optimal Outcomes for Preterm Infants after NICU Discharge: A Life Course Health Development Approach to High-Risk Infant Follow-Up

Children born prematurely (<37 weeks' gestation) have an increased risk for chronic health problems and developmental challenges compared to their term-born peers. The threats to health and development posed by prematurity, the unintended effects of life-sustaining neonatal intensive care, the associated neonatal morbidities, and the profound stressors to families affect well-being during infancy, childhood, adolescence, and beyond. Specialized clinical programs provide medical and developmental follow-up care for preterm infants after hospital discharge. High-risk infant follow-up, like most post-discharge health services, has many shortcomings, including unclear goals, inadequate support for infants, parents, and families, fragmented service provisions, poor coordination among providers, and an artificially foreshortened time horizon. There are well-documented inequities in care access and delivery. We propose applying a life course health development framework to clinical follow-up for children born prematurely that is contextually appropriate, developmentally responsive, and equitably deployed. The concepts of health development, unfolding, complexity, timing, plasticity, thriving, and harmony can be mapped to key components of follow-up care delivery to address pressing health challenges. This new approach envisions a more effective version of clinical follow-up to support the best possible functional outcomes and the opportunity for every premature infant to thrive within their family and community environments over their life course.

Outcomes of Preterm Infants: Shifting Focus, Extending the View

Advances in perinatal care have led to remarkable long-term survival for infants who are born preterm. This article reviews the broader context of follow-up care, highlighting the need to reenvision some areas, such as improving parental support by embedding parental involvement in the neonatal intensive care unit, incorporating parental perspectives about outcomes into follow-up care models and research, supporting their mental health, addressing social determinants of health and disparities, and advocating for change. Multicenter quality improvement networks allow identification and implementation of best practices for follow-up care.

Health Care Disparities in High-Risk Neonates

Long-standing health disparities in maternal reproductive health, infant morbidity and mortality, and long-term developmental outcomes are rooted in a foundation of structural racism. Social determinants of health profoundly affect reproductive health outcomes of Black and Hispanic women disproportionately; they have higher rates of death during pregnancy and preterm birth. Their infants are also more likely to be cared for in poorer quality neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), receive poorer quality of NICU care, and are less likely to be referred to an appropriate high-risk NICU follow-up program. Interventions that mitigate the impact of racism will help to eliminate health disparities.

High-Risk Infant Follow-Up After NICU Discharge: Current Care Models and Future Considerations

Preterm infants are at heightened risk for chronic health problems and developmental delays compared with term-born peers. High-risk infant follow-up programs provide surveillance and support for problems that may emerge during infancy and early childhood. Although considered standard of care, program structure, content, and timing are highly variable. Families face challenges accessing recommended follow-up services. Here, the authors review common models of high-risk infant follow-up, describe novel approaches, and outline considerations for improving the quality, value, and equity of follow-up care.