Banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity

Ring Augmentation of the Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of 5-Year Follow-Up Results

BACKGROUND

The ring-augmented Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (raRYGB) has been reported to result in higher long-term weight loss compared to regular Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). However, the type of ring used varied within studies, leading to heterogeneity in reported results. Therefore, this study compares the 5-year results of RYGB with and without ring augmentation using a specific prefabricated gastric ring.

METHODS

All consecutive patients from a single center who received primary raRYGB between June 1, 2016, and May 31, 2018, with complete 5-year follow-up data were included and compared to a propensity score matched cohort receiving RYGB in the same period from the Dutch Audit for Treatment of Obesity. To ensure fair effect estimation of placing a ring, only RYGB procedures with alimentary and biliopancreatic limb lengths similar to those of the raRYGB were considered eligible. The primary outcome was percentage total weight loss (%TWL). Secondary outcomes included recurrent weight gain (RWG), obesity complication improvement, and complications.

RESULTS

In total, 592 matched patients were analyzed. raRYGB was associated with higher %TWL at 5 years (31.5% versus 28.0%, β = 3.59, 95% CI [2.09-5.09], p < 0.01) and lower odds on RWG (odds ratio = 0.56, 95% CI [0.38-0.83], p < 0.01). Improvement of obesity complications and short-term complication rates were comparable in both groups. After 5 years, 13 patients (4%) had experienced ring-related complications needing reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

At 5 years, raRYGB was associated with higher %TWL and lower odds on RWG. The occurrence of ring-related complications was limited.

Banded versus non-banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: short, mid, and long-term surgical outcomes - a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is considered as one of the most effective treatments for people with obesity. A variant of this procedure, the banded-RYGB, may present several advantages over the standard technique. These potential benefits include enhanced weight loss, decreased recurrent weight gain, a lower incidence of dumping syndrome, and less distention of the jejunum below the gastrojejunostomy.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this meta-analysis is to compare the surgical outcomes of RYGB procedures with a band (banded-RYGB) and without a band (RYGB) in the management of individuals with obesity.

SETTING

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and the Cochrane protocol (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023439874).

METHOD

The systematic review process led to the identification of 13 comparative studies involving 3230 patients who underwent banded-RYGB and 5302 who received RYGB, all of which were eligible for inclusion and meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Four studies reported data on 1-year postoperative percent excess weight loss (%EWL), demonstrating a significant increase of 6.03 %EWL in patients who underwent banded-RYGB. Four studies reported the 2-year postoperative %EWL, showing that patients who had banded-RYGB experienced a 5.32 greater %EWL compared to those who received RYGB, even if this was not statistically significant. For 5-year %EWL after bariatric surgery, 5 studies were included for continuous outcome meta-analysis. The average 5-years %EWL difference was 7.6 in favor of banded-RYGB. Patients who had banded-RYGB presented a nonsignificant 1.45 OR of developing postoperative complications compared to patients receiving RYGB.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrates that, compared to RYGB, patients who underwent banded-RYGB surgery showed a statistically significant increase in the %EWL at 1, 2, and 5 years postoperatively. Moreover, the banding procedure does not significantly increase the risk of postoperative complications.

Long-term Comparative Evaluation of Weight Loss and Complications of Banded and Non-banded Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

PURPOSE

The use of a nonadjustable silicone band around the gastric pouch of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) to reduce the recurrence of obesity is still being debated in the literature. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate banded and non-banded RYGB regarding % total weight loss (%TWL) and complications up to 10 years postoperatively and regarding the removal rate of the silicone band.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective study of the medical records of all patients submitted to banded and non-banded RYGB between 2000 and 2020 was conducted. Clinical data (age, gender, weight, body mass index-BMI, comorbidities, %TWL, and the prevalence of vomiting) and laboratory data (hemoglobin, serum iron, albumin, and vitamin B12) were obtained preoperatively and at 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, and 10 years for both groups and at 12, 15, and 20 years after banded RYGB.

RESULTS

In total, 858 patients underwent RYGB: 409 underwent banded RYGB and 449 underwent non-banded RYGB. In the preoperative period, banded RYGB patients were heavier and had higher rates of hypertension and dyslipidemia. The %TWL was higher in the banded RYGB group up to 7 years. The prevalence of vomiting is much higher in this group, which also had lower laboratory test values. Of the banded RYGB patients, 9.53% had to have the silicone ring removed after presenting complications.

CONCLUSION

Banded RYGB promotes significantly higher rates of TWL at the expense of a higher frequency of food intolerance and vomiting.

Banded One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (BOAGB) for Patients Living with Obesity and Extreme Obesity: A Single Institution's Experience

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of patients suffering from extreme obesity (body mass index (BMI) ≥ 50) has significantly increased over the past three decades, surpassing the rise in the general population of overweight patients. Weight loss outcomes after bariatric surgery in patients suffering from extreme obesity are less favorable, with a higher incidence of weight regain. Variations of existing bariatric procedures have been proposed to address this issue. One such variation is adding a gastric band to limit the expansion of the newly created pouch. Limited data exist regarding the effectiveness of this procedure, called the banded one-anastomosis gastric bypass (BOAGB) procedure, compared to other bariatric procedures.

METHOD

In this retrospective study, we compared all patients who underwent the BOAGB procedure at the Bariatric Surgery Unit in our Medical Center with a postoperative follow-up of at least 1 year with patients who underwent a one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) procedures. Data collected included demographics, comorbidities, surgical outcomes, complications, and postoperative quality-of-life assessments.

RESULTS

One hundred eleven patients were enlisted to our study during the relevant study period-24 patients underwent the BOAGB procedure, 43 underwent OAGB, and 44 underwent a SG. Lost to follow-up beyond 30 days was 9% (at 1-year post-surgery, we were able to establish contact with 101 patients). The pre-op BMI was significantly higher in the BOAGB group compared to the other procedures. Additionally, a higher prevalence of diabetes was observed in the BOAGB group. The duration of surgery was significantly longer for the BOAGB procedure. No significant differences were found in surgical complications. Overall, all procedures resulted in significant excess weight loss (EWL) or change in BMI, improvement in comorbidities, and improved quality of life postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The BOAGB procedure, like OAGB and SG, demonstrated favorable weight loss outcomes and weight maintenance 1 year postoperatively without significant differences between the procedures. The BOAGB procedure is relatively new, with good bariatric outcomes and a favorable safety profile. Long-term study is needed to evaluate these various bariatric procedures' efficacy further.

Safety and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Vertical Clip Gastroplasty: Early Results of an Italian Multicenter Study

PURPOSE

Sleeve gastrectomy, the most commonly performed bariatric surgery procedure, carries limitations both short term including postoperative complications such as hemorrhage and gastric fistula and long term such as weight regain and gastroesophageal reflux. A new procedure has been proposed to overcome many of these limitations: laparoscopic vertical clip gastroplasty (LVCG) with BariClip.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty patients were offered LVCG and enrolled for a feasibility study in two referral bariatric centers. Indication was given as for sleeve gastrectomy, after a multidisciplinary path evaluating age, gender, BMI, comorbidities, eating behaviors, and gastroesophageal reflux. The primary outcome was major postoperative complications. Secondary outcomes included weight loss, incidence of de-novo GERD, and comorbidity resolution.

RESULTS

Patients had a mean age of 44 years and mean BMI of 37 kg/m² ± 6.2. All procedures were performed successfully in laparoscopy, with no conversion or intraoperative adverse events. The overall major postoperative complication rate was 6%. Re-operation was required in three patients for slippage. No mortality occurred. Excess weight loss, excess BMI loss, and total weight loss at 6 months were 36%, 57%, and 22%, respectively. There was no instance of de-novo GERD. Resolution of hypertension occurred in 50% of cases, OSAS in 65% of cases, and DMII in 80% of cases.

CONCLUSION

The safety of LVCG procedure has been reproduced in a multicentric, multi-surgeon study. Weight loss outcomes appear promising. A randomized trial is needed to fully assess the benefits of LVCG.

The Benefits of Banded over Non-banded Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Patients with Morbid Obesity: a Multi-center Study

Background

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) has proven to be an effective treatment for obesity with excellent long-term results, even though weight regain can occur. A method to improve the results of RYGB and minimize chance of weight regain is banded RYGB. Better sustained weight loss is also related to higher remission of comorbidities. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of banded and non-banded RYGB on long-term weight loss results and comorbidities.

Method

A retrospective comparative data study was performed. Patients who underwent a primary RYGB between July 2013 and December 2014 and followed a 5-year follow-up program in the Dutch Obesity Clinic were included. Comorbidities were assessed during screening and follow-up.

Results

The study included 375 patients with mean weight and body mass index (BMI) of 128.9 (± 21.2) kg and 44.50 (± 5.72) kg/m². Of this group, 184 patients underwent RYGB and 191 banded RYGB. During follow-up (3 months, 1–5 years) % Total Weight Loss (%TWL) was superior in the banded group (32.6% vs 27.6% at 5 years post-operative, p < 0.001). Complication rates in both groups were similar. Comorbidity improvement or remission did not significantly differ between the two groups (p = 0.14–1.00). After 5 years of follow-up, 79 patients (20.5%) were lost to follow-up.

Conclusion

Banded RYGB does show superior weight loss compared to non-banded RYGB. No difference in effect on comorbidity improvement or remission was observed. Since complication rates are similar, while weight loss is significantly greater, we recommend performing banded RYGB over non-banded RYGB.

Graphical abstract

Weight loss and complications of the banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: lessons learned from a prospective case control study

OBJECTIVE

Obesity is a growing global health burden which is particularly challenging to manage. Bariatric surgery is considered the most effective means of sustained weight loss, and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is considered the most effective treatment for morbid obesity. The additional benefit of placing a non-adjustable band to form a banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass has gained interest as a measure to improve weight loss; however, comparative data are few, and complications can be high.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective case-control study of 484 patients aged 18 and over who received either banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with a non-adjustable silastic ring or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Patients were followed up for five years and evaluated for weight loss, percentage excess weight loss (%EWL), BMI, and band-related complications.

RESULTS

No significant difference was detected in %EWL or BMI between BRYGB and RYGB. The mean raw weight loss, %EWL, and BMI for BRYGB verse RYGB were as follows: 27.49 SD (17.11) kg verse 34.46 SD (18.18) kg, 65.7% SD (30%) verse 62.2% SD (37%), and 32.33 SD (6.9) kg/m² verse 32.43 SD (7.2) kg/m². A total of 80 (21.7%) patients had the non-adjustable band removed for complications.

CONCLUSION

There is little difference in weight-loss results when comparing BRYGB to RYGB and non-adjustable bands may cause significant complications.

Banded RYGB Ring Slippage Endoscopic Removal with Self-expandable Stents: a Comparative Study Between Metallic and Plastic One

PURPOSE

Banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) was a common bariatric procedure in the 2000s, and the ring slippage is one of its late adverse events. Both plastic and metallic stents have been reported as adjunct methods to induce erosion and facilitate endoscopic removal of the ring.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and effectiveness of self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) and plastic stents (SEPS) to treat ring slippage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective longitudinal study analyzing consecutive patients with ring dysfunction treated with stents plus endoscopic removal.

RESULTS

Ninety patients were enrolled (36 SEMS vs. 54 SEPS). The mean age was 48.56 ± 13.07 and 45.6 ± 12.1 in the SEMS and SEPS groups, respectively. All patients had band slippage, but 24 from SEMS group and 23 from SEPS group had further complications. There were more complications in metallic stent concerning mean absolute number of therapy-related adverse events (1.33 ± 0.48 vs. 1.72 ± 0.5, p > 0.05) and time until erosion (14.9 ± 1.6 vs. 13.8 ± 1.4 days, p > 0.05). Female sex and age > 41 years old correlated with longer time to band erosion and higher incidence of adverse events in SEMS patients. In SEPS group, only female sex was a risk factor for adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Both procedures were efficient at inducing band erosion with similar safety profiles. Older and female patients are at a higher risk of treatment-related adverse events, especially those receiving SEMS.

Laparoscopic Banded One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: A Single-Center Series

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass (LOAGB) is a relatively new procedure for the treatment of morbid obesity and related comorbidities. On average, this procedure results in good postoperative weight loss with a low complication rate. Recent publications suggest that dumping syndrome and weight regain might be reduced by placing a silicone ring over the gastric pouch during the procedure, so called laparoscopic banded one anastomosis gastric bypass (LBOAGB).

METHODS

86 patients undergoing LBOAGB between 2018 and 2020 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Hospital records were used to assess weight loss, comorbidity resolution, and any complications either in the short or medium term.

RESULTS

54 Female and 32 male patients were included with a mean age of 43 years (25-64), preoperative body mass index of 42 kg/m² (35-49), and preoperative weight of 114 kg (86-162). Thirty-four patients presented with type 2 diabetes (39.5%), 42 patients (49%) diagnosed with hypertension, 24 presented with OSAS (28%), and 21 (24%) hypercholesterolaemia patients were included. In total, 36 patients were diagnosed with multiple comorbidities. The operative data showed an average operative time of 48 minutes with 3.4% of patients suffering from early (minor) complications and 2.3% with a late (minor) complication. One patient required reoperation due to intra-abdominal bleeding. The median length of hospital stay was 2.5 days. Median follow-up was 18 months (5-36). In that period, no patient required ring removal or conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Food intolerance/vomiting was present in 1 patient (1.1%), bile reflux was present in 1 patient (1.1%), and no stomal ulcers were observed. Mean % excess weight loss at 12 and 24 months was 72% and 80%, respectively. Fifty-two out of 86 patients (60%) had a complete resolution of comorbidities. A CONUT score >2 (mild malnutrition) was found in 40% of patients, while a CONUT score 0-1 was found in 60% of patients.

CONCLUSION

LBOAGB shows promising results in terms of safety and efficacy in the short term. Further prospective studies will be required to evaluate the consistency of the results in the long term.

Revisional Adjustable Gastric Band in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass-Is It Worth It?

PURPOSE

A subset of patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) presents with either insufficient weight loss or weight regain. Data on the revisional restrictive options including laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) is scarce. This study analyzes the mid-term efficacy and safety of LAGB as a revisional procedure after RYGB.

METHODS

Data of all patients with revisional LAGB after primary RYGB between January 2011 and May 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Outcomes included assessment of weight changes, resolution of comorbidities, and early and late complications during the study period.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were included. The median Body Mass Index (BMI) before revisional LAGB was 34.8 (interquartile range [IQR] 31.9-38.1) kg/m2. After a median follow-up of 33.5 (IQR 19.5-76.5) months, the median BMI was 28.7 (IQR 26.1-32.2) kg/m2. The median additional Excess Weight Loss (EWL) was 37.6% (IQR 23-44.4), leading to a median total EWL of 79.5% (IQR 54.4-94.6). BMI and EWL post-LAGB improved significantly compared to BMI and EWL pre-LAGB (p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome resolved 6 months after LAGB in one patient. Three band deflations occurred during the follow-up. Six patients underwent band removal after a median time of 19 (IQR 15.8-26) months. Overall, thirteen patients underwent a reoperation. There was no loss of follow-up until 5 years. After that, two patients were lost to follow-up.

CONCLUSION

LAGB may be a salvage option after failed RYGB. However, the high rate of revisions after secondary LAGB needs to be taken into consideration.

Banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in patients with super morbid obesity (BRandY-study): protocol of a cohort study with 10 year follow-up

Background

Weight loss outcomes after bariatric surgery are less favorable in super morbidly obese patients (BMI ≥50 kg/m²). Non-response, either defined as insufficient weight loss or weight regain after initial successful weight loss, is a matter of serious concern in these patients. The primary banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass has shown promising results regarding weight loss in the bariatric population. However, up to now, long-term comparative data about the banded and non-banded bypass in superobese patients is lacking. The aim of this study is to assess the added value of the banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in superobese patients on long-term weight loss outcomes.

Methods

This single center study will evaluate superobese patients who receive a non-banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (NB-RYGB) and a banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (B-RYGB). Data from the NB-RYGB group will be collected in retrospect, while data from the B-RYGB group will be collected prospectively. When performing a B-RYGB, a 7.0–8.0 cm silastic ring (MiniMizer®) will be placed proximal to the gastrojejunostomy. The main outcomes of this study are weight loss and non-response during a 10 year follow-up period. Secondary outcomes are reduction of obesity related comorbidities and medication, (ring-related) morbidity and mortality, complications, re-operations, patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life. A total of 142 patients will be included in this study.

Discussion

This study will help establish the clinical utility of the B-RYGB in superobese patients.

Trial register

NL8093. Registered 15 October 2019 - Retrospectively registered on the Dutch Registry of Clinical trials, www.trialregister.nl

Ongoing Inconsistencies in Weight Loss Reporting Following Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review

Weight loss is the primary outcome following bariatric surgery; however, its documentation within current literature is heterogeneous and poorly defined, limiting meaningful comparison between studies. Randomized controlled trials from 2012 to 2016 were identified using the Medline database through "Gastric bypass OR sleeve gastrectomy AND weight" search terms. A total of 73 studies with 5948 patients were included. Reporting of preoperative weight was done primarily using mean body mass index (BMI) (87.7%) and mean weight (65.8%). Postoperative weight reporting was more variable, with the most frequently reported measure being mean postoperative BMI (71.2%). Overall, nearly one third of all bariatric literature contained discrepancies that precluded meaningful meta-analysis. Reporting of weight loss following bariatric surgery is becoming increasingly diverse for both pre- and post-operative outcomes. Ongoing heterogeneity will continue to act as a barrier to meaningful comparison of bariatric outcomes until standardized reporting practices become adopted.

Weight Loss and Vomiting 1 Year After Banded Versus Non-banded One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: a Prospective Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

The weight loss outcomes after banded one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) remain to be determined.

OBJECTIVE

To compare weight loss and vomiting 1 year after banded versus non-banded OAGB.

METHODS

This is a prospective, open-label, randomized study, which evaluated 33 individuals with morbid obesity, which underwent banded (16 individuals) and non-banded OAGB (17 individuals) and were followed up for 12 months. Weight loss (percentages of total weight loss-%TWL-and excess weight loss-%EWL) and occurrence of vomiting were assessed and compared before surgery and after 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

At baseline, there were no differences between groups in regard to age, gender, and body mass index (BMI). At 6 and 12 months post-op, and the overall mean %TWL regardless of band use was 22.4 ± 7% and 29 ± 6.9%, respectively, and the overall average %EWL regardless of band use was 66.8 ± 22.9% and 86.3 ± 24%, respectively. %TWL did not differ between the banded and non-banded groups at 6 (21.8 ± 6.8% vs. 23.1 ± 7.4%; p = 0.7) and 12 months post-op (27.5 ± 6.6% vs. 30.4 ± 7.1%; p = 0.3), as well as %EWL at 6 (67 ± 22.9% vs. 67.6 ± 23.6%; p = 0.6) and 12 months post-op (83.5 ± 24.4% vs. 89 ± 24.1%; p = 0.4). The occurrence of vomiting did not significantly differ between banded and non-banded OAGB at 6 (12.5% vs. 11.8%; p = 0.9) and 12 months post-op (12.5% vs. 5.9%; p = 0.5).

CONCLUSION

OAGB led to an overall satisfactory weight loss after 1 year, regardless of band use. Banded OAGB did not lead to neither significantly higher weight loss nor more vomiting than non-banded OAGB 1 year after surgery.

Gastric Emptying and Food Tolerance Following Banded and Non-banded Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

INTRODUCTION

Gastric emptying (GE) and food tolerance (FT) can be altered after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) has been performed, especially when it involved the use of a restrictive mechanism (such as a silastic ring).

AIM

To assess GE and FT in patients who underwent banded (BRYGB) or non-banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).

METHODS

Forty-seven BRYGB patients and 47 RYGB patients underwent gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES) and FT assessment (by means of a questionnaire) between 6 months and 2 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

GES was performed on average 11.7 ± 5.0 months (6 to 24) postoperatively. T½ medians (time taken for the gastric radioactivity to decrease to half of the original value in the gastric pouch) in the RYGB and BRYGB groups were 48.7 min (40.6-183.0 min) and 56.3 min (41.1-390.9 min), respectively (p = 0.031). The median of total questionnaire scores was 24 points (18-27) in the RYGB group and 20 points (13-27) in the BRYBG group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The band (silastic ring) delays GE time and does not affect patient satisfaction or food tolerance to vegetables, bread, or rice, but does affect tolerance to the intake of meat, salad, and pasta. The best tolerated foods are vegetables, salad, and fish. Banded patients are more likely to regurgitate and vomit. Gastric emptying does not affect FT.

EARLY WEIGHT LOSS OUTCOMES AND GLUCOSE METABOLISM PARAMETERS AFTER BANDED VERSUS NON-BANDED ONE ANASTOMOSIS GASTRIC BYPASS: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL

BACKGROUND

The influence of the placement of a band on the outcomes of one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) has not been appropriately studied yet.

OBJECTIVE

To compare early weight loss and glucose metabolism parameters following banded versus non-banded OAGB.

METHODS

A prospective randomized study, which evaluated 20 morbidly obese individuals who underwent banded and non-banded OAGB and were followed-up for three months. Weight loss (percentage of excess weight loss - %EWL and percentage of body mass index loss - %BMIL) and glucose metabolism outcomes (glucose, insulin and homeostasis model assessment - HOMA) were compared.

RESULTS

The banded group presented a significantly higher %EWL at one month (29.6±5.5% vs 17.2±3.4%; P<0.0001) and two months post-surgery (46±7% vs 34.2±9%; P=0.004544), as well as a significantly higher %BMIL at one month (9.7±1.1% vs 5.8±0.8%; P<0.0001), two months (15±1.4% vs 11.5±2.1; P=0.000248), and three months (18.8±1.8% vs 15.7±3.2%; P=0.016637). At three months, banded OAGB led to significant decreases of insulin (14.4±4.3 vs 7.6±1.9; P=0.00044) and HOMA (3.1±1.1 vs 1.5±0.4; P=0.00044), whereas non-banded OAGB also led to significant decreases of insulin (14.8±7.6 vs 7.8±3.1; P=0.006) and HOMA (3.2±1.9 vs 1.6±0.8; P=0.0041). The percent variation of HOMA did not significantly differ between banded and non-banded OAGB (P=0.62414); overall, the percent variation of HOMA was not correlated with %EWL (P=0.96988) or %BMIL (P=0.82299).

CONCLUSION

Banded OAGB led to a higher early weight loss than the standard technique. Banded and non-banded OAGB led to improvements in insulin resistance regardless of weight loss.

Banded vs. non-banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

We aim to review the available literature on patients with morbid obesity treated with banded (BRYGB) or non-banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (NBRYGB), in order to compare the clinical outcomes and intraoperative parameters of the two methods. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane library and Scopus databases, in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria incorporating 3899 patients. This study reveals similar rates of complications, mortality, remission of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, gastroesophageal reflux and obstructive sleep apnoea, along with similar % excess weight loss (%EWL) at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. In contrast, according to an analysis of two eligible studies the BRYGB procedure was associated with increased %EWL at 5 years postoperatively. These results should be interpreted with caution due to the small number of statistical arms and randomized controlled studies. However, the present article represents the best available evidence in the field. Well-designed, randomized controlled studies, comparing BRYGB to NBRYGB, are necessary to further assess their clinical outcomes.

The Role of Gastrojejunostomy Size on Gastric Bypass Weight Loss

BACKGROUND

The laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) has been considered a reference procedure in the bariatric surgery. The linear-stapled gastrojejunostomy (GJ) has proved to be safe and effective, but its optimal size referred to postoperative weight loss remains poorly understood.

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate the role of the linear-stapled GJ size in the mid-term post-LRYGB weight loss and occurrence of complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January to April 2014, 128 patients underwent LRYGB with linear-stapled GJ in a 2-year follow-up. The LRYGB were carried out with the same technical steps, except for the length of the GJ. In GJ-15-mm group (n = 64), the GJ was constructed with white 45-mm cartridge in an extension of only 15 mm whereas in GJ-45-mm group (n = 64), the GJ was achieved using full extension of the cartridge. The body mass index (BMI) reduction was recorded for 24 months after procedure.

RESULTS

The mean ages were 38 ± 10.6 and 41.3 ± 12.3 years, and there were 45 (70.3%) and 51 (79.7%) females in the GJ-15-mm and GJ-45-mm groups, respectively. The analysis on raw BMI data showed that both groups had significant reduction of BMI over time (p ≤ 0.05); however, reduction was greater in the GJ-15-mm group from 18 months onwards (p ≤ 0.05). The only complication observed was a case (1.56%) of stenosis in the group GJ-15 mm.

CONCLUSION

The global analysis of BMI reduction indicated that the narrower GJ used (GJ-15-mm group) represented a favoring factor decreasing significantly more the BMI when compared to the wider one (GJ-45-mm group).

Banded Gastric Bypass: Better Long-Term Results? A Cohort Study with Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

While gastric bypass has been the treatment of choice for morbid obesity, insufficient weight loss and even weight regain has been observed in a sub-group of patients. Dilatation of the pouch, pouch outlet, and proximal alimentary limb have been suggested to cause weight regain on the long term. The banded gastric bypass surgery has been introduced to overcome this problem.

METHODS

Four hundred thirty-two patients (n = 254, non-banded/n = 178, banded-GaBP Ring™) were followed-up for 5 years. Patients were evaluated for weight loss, % excess weight loss (%EWL), weight regain and BMI.

RESULTS

No significant differences between groups in the first year following surgery were observed in terms of weight loss and %EWL. %EWL at 5 years was as follows: non-banded 65.2 ± 20.0 %; banded 74.0 ± 15.1 %. At 5 years, the banded group showed more weight loss (non-banded 35.4 ± 12.5; banded 43.9 ± 11.9 kg, P < 0.0001); weight regain was significantly higher in the non-banded group (P < 0.0001). Only minor complications were reported; no signs of ring migration or slippage were reported.

CONCLUSION

Although, following the first year after surgery, no differences in treatment groups were observed in terms of weight loss, 5 years following surgery, patients who received banded surgery maintained better weight loss and had less weight regain compared to the non-banded group. These results suggest that laparoscopic banded gastric bypass using a silastic ring was effective in maintaining weight loss on the long term, while the complication rate was low. The banded gastric bypass is regarded by us as the new gold standard.

Rapid Evidence Review of Bariatric Surgery in Super Obesity (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2)

BACKGROUND

Despite accumulating evidence of the important health benefits of bariatric surgery in morbidly obese patients in general, bariatric surgery outcomes are less clear in higher-risk, high-priority populations of patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m². To help the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research & Development Service (HSR&D) develop a research agenda, we conducted a rapid evidence review to better understand bariatric surgery outcomes in adults with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m².

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE^®, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov through June 2016. We included trials and observational studies. We used pre-specified criteria to select studies, abstract data, and rate internal validity and strength of the evidence (PROSPERO registration number CRD42015025348). All decisions were completed by one reviewer and checked by another.

RESULTS

Among 1892 citations, we included 23 studies in this rapid review. Compared with usual care, one large retrospective VA study provided limited evidence that bariatric surgery can lead to increased mortality in the first year, but decreased mortality long-term among super obese veterans. Studies that compared different bariatric surgical approaches suggested some differences in weight loss and complications. Laparoscopic gastric bypass generally resulted in greater short-term proportion of excess weight loss than did other procedures. Duodenal switch led to greater long-term weight loss than did gastric bypass, but with more complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The published literature that separates the super obese is insufficient for determining the precise balance of benefits and harms of bariatric surgery in this high-risk subgroup. Future studies should evaluate a more complete set of key outcomes with longer follow-up in larger samples of more broadly representative adults.

Comparison Between Banded and Nonbanded Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass with 2-Year Follow-Up: a Preliminary Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is one of the most widely used bariatric surgeries for treatment of moderate and severe obesity. Placing a band around the pouch to band the gastric bypass operation has been reported to increase the restriction resulting in better weight loss and weight loss maintenance. A retrospective comparative study of banded versus nonbanded gastric bypass was done to see if banding the pouch made a difference in the weight loss and quality of life outcome in the patients.

METHODS

Data from all patients who had a gastric bypass in the year 2012 at our centre were reviewed. They were divided into two groups the banded and the nonbanded groups. Patients with complete 2-year follow-up were analysed in terms of weight loss, weight regain and quality of life changes.

RESULTS

Two hundred ten patients had gastric bypass in 2012; 165 had complete 2-year follow-up; 64 were banded and 101 nonbanded. The preoperative patient profile in terms of weight, gender and comorbid conditions was similar in both groups except the body mass index (BMI) was significantly higher in the banded group. The perioperative and postoperative complication rates were similar. The weight, BMI and percentage excess weight loss (PEWL) at 2 years were 80.93 kg, 29.45 kg/m2 and 60.76 % in the nonbanded group and 77.06 kg, 27.66 kg/m2 and 71.45 % in the banded group, respectively. Resolution of comorbid conditions was the same in both groups. The overall Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index went from 88.98 preoperatively to 109.33 postoperatively in the nonbanded group and 92.5 to 112.81 in the banded group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The patients with banded gastric bypass had significantly better results in terms of weight loss, weight stability and Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index scores at 2 years.

Sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for type 2 diabetes and morbid obesity: double-blind randomised clinical trial protocol

INTRODUCTION

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) in association with obesity is an increasing disease burden. Bariatric surgery is the only effective therapy for achieving remission of T2D among those with morbid obesity. It is unclear which of the two most commonly performed types of bariatric surgery, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), is most effective for obese patients with T2D. The primary objective of this study is to determine whether LSG or LRYGB is more effective in achieving HbA1c<6% (<42 mmol/mol) without the use of diabetes medication at 5 years.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Single-centre, double-blind (assessor and patient), parallel, randomised clinical trial (RCT) conducted in New Zealand, targeting 106 patients. Eligibility criteria include age 20-55 years, T2D of at least 6 months duration and body mass index 35-65 kg/m(2) for at least 5 years. Randomisation 1:1 to LSG or LRYGB, used random number codes disclosed to the operating surgeon after induction of anaesthesia. A standard medication adjustment schedule will be used during postoperative metabolic assessments. Secondary outcomes include proportions achieving HbA1c<5.7% (39 mmol/mol) or HbA1c<6.5% (48 mmol/mol) without the use of diabetes medication, comparative weight loss, obesity-related comorbidity, operative complications, revision rate, mortality, quality of life, anxiety and depression scores. Exploratory outcomes include changes in satiety, gut hormone and gut microbiota to gain underlying mechanistic insights into T2D remission.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval was obtained from the New Zealand regional ethics committee (NZ93405) who also provided independent safety monitoring of the trial. Study commenced in September 2011. Recruitment completed in October 2014. Data collection is ongoing. Results will be reported in manuscripts submitted to peer-reviewed journals and in presentations at national and international meetings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

ACTRN12611000751976, NCT01486680; Pre-results.

Primary banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review

Primary banding of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass remains controversial. Though there are surgeons who believe it should be the standard practice as it results in superior weight loss and prevents weight regain in the long term, there are others who are concerned about the risk of food intolerance and complications related to band. This review investigates published English language literature systematically to find out the advantages and disadvantages of primary banding of a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Primary silicone-banded laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a pilot study

INTRODUCTION

Some degree of inadequate weight loss or recidivism is seen with all bariatric surgical approaches. To combat this, some authors have suggested placing a reinforcing ring around gastric bypass pouches or gastric sleeves. The aim of this study was to assess the initial feasibility and efficacy of silicone-banded laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All cases of silicone-banded LSG performed at our center were retrospectively identified. Patient demographics, perioperative parameters, and postoperative outcomes were extracted and analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients (7 females, 6 males) were identified and analyzed. Preoperatively, patients had a mean age of 56.0 ± 8.3 years, a mean body mass index (BMI) of 53.7 ± 8.5 kg/m(2), and a median of seven comorbidities. All cases were completed laparoscopically by one surgeon, with a mean operative time of 140.7 ± 25.7 minutes and a mean estimated blood loss of 56.9 ± 30.6 mL. There were no mortalities. The only intraoperative complication was a respiratory arrest after extubation, and this patient recovered fully. Postoperatively, 2 patients (15.4%) experienced a complication: one had a pulmonary embolism requiring brief re-admission, and the other had a syncopal episode from a second-degree atrioventricular block. No long-term complications were encountered. One patient was lost to follow-up. At a median follow-up of 16 months (range, 6-27 months), the mean BMI of the cohort was 38.7 ± 7.9 kg/m(2), which corresponded to a mean excess weight loss (EWL) of 54.8 ± 19.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

This report provides initial evidence that silicone-banded LSG is feasible and can be performed with minimal morbidity and significant EWL at short-term follow-up.