Management of staple line leaks following sleeve gastrectomy

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Outcome Trends Over Time: Are We Improving?

BACKGROUND

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is an effective treatment option for patients with obesity. Robotic sleeve gastrectomy (RSG) is reported to have worse short-term patient outcomes compared to laparoscopic SG (LSG), but prior studies may not have accounted for evolving technology, including stapler utilization.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared RSG and LSG outcomes over different time periods.

SETTING

Academic Hospital.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The 2015 to 2021 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Project (MBSAQIP) databases were used. Matched cohort analyses compared adverse outcomes within 30 days for the 2015-2018 and 2019-2021 cohorts. Bivariate and regression models compared cohorts using Stata/MP 17.0.

RESULTS

Seven hundred sixty-eight thousand and sixty-nine SG were analyzed. Over the 7-year study period, all patient outcomes, operation length (OL), and length of stay (LOS) trended downward for RSG, except surgical site infection (SSI). In the 2015-2018 cohort, leak was significantly higher with RSG (OR 1.53), and OL and LOS longer (p < 0.001). In the 2019-2021 cohort which corelated with a significant increase in robotic cases, leak (OR 1.36), SSI (OR 1.46), and morbidity (OR 1.11) were higher with RSG. While the mean difference in OL and LOS decreased between the two time periods, they remain longer for RSG (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

While RSG and LSG are safe with similar mortality, RSG continues to be associated with higher rates of morbidity, leak, and SSI, as well as longer OL, hospital LOS, and higher cost. The study is limited by the ability to account for the impact of surgeon experience and stapler utilization on outcomes.

Choosing the best endoscopic approach for post-bariatric surgical leaks and fistulas: Basic principles and recommendations

Post-surgical leaks and fistulas are the most feared complication of bariatric surgery. They have become more common in clinical practice given the increasing number of these procedures and can be very difficult to treat. These two related conditions must be distinguished and characterized to guide the appropriate treatment. Leak is defined as a transmural defect with communication between the intra and extraluminal compartments, while fistula is defined as an abnormal communication between two epithelialized surfaces. Traditionally, surgical treatment was the preferred approach for leaks and fistulas and was associated with high morbidity with significant mortality rates. However, with the development of novel devices and techniques, endoscopic therapy plays an increasingly essential role in managing these conditions. Early diagnosis and endoscopic therapy initiation after clinical stabilization are crucial to success since clinical success rates are higher for acute leaks and fistulas when compared to late and chronic leaks and fistulas. Several endoscopic techniques are available with different mechanisms of action, including direct closure, covering/diverting or draining. The treatment should be individualized by considering the characteristics of both the patient and the defect. Although there is a lack of high-quality studies to provide standardized treatment algorithms, this narrative review aims to provide a summary of the current scientific evidence and, based on this data and our extensive experience, make recommendations to help choose the best endoscopic approach for the management of post-bariatric surgical leaks and fistulas.

Management of Staple Line Leaks after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

Background and Objectives:

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy has become one of the most popular bariatric surgeries in the United States with a low rate of morbidity and effective weight loss. However, staple line leak remains a feared complication requiring a lengthy and difficult treatment course until resolution. This study outlines the various treatment methods used within a high-volume bariatric practice for successful leak resolution without necessitating a conversion procedure.

Methods:

A retrospective review was conducted on all patients with staple line leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in a three-surgeon bariatric practice from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2019.

Results:

A total of 10 staple line leaks were identified with a leak rate of 0.9%. Patients presented on average 29.3 days postoperatively and were all diagnosed on computed tomography. Three patients were initially managed operatively with washout and drainage procedure. Six patients were managed endoscopically initially with either stent or over-the-scope clip placement. Most patients required multiple interventions with an average of 2.4 interventions per patient. Average time to leak resolution was 48.2 days (15–95 days).

Conclusion:

Management of staple line leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy requires a multimodal approach usually requiring multiple interventions before leak resolution. We demonstrate effective utilization of varying interventions that lead to effective leak resolution and avoid conversion operations.

Predictability of Endoscopic Success for Foregut and Bariatric Leak in an Experienced Quaternary Center

BACKGROUND

Leaks of the esophagus and stomach are difficult to manage and associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Endoscopic therapy can manage these leaks without surgical intervention. Our goal is to create a scoring tool to aid in predicting the success of endoscopic therapy in these patients.

STUDY DESIGN

An IRB-approved prospectively maintained database was retrospectively reviewed for all patients treated for gastrointestinal leaks from July 2013 to January 2021, including patients treated for esophageal and stomach leaks. Endpoints include success of leak closure for patients treated solely by endoscopic therapy (ET) compared with surgical therapy as failed endoscopic therapy (FET). A multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to identify independent risk factors for predicting success of endoscopic therapy, and a scoring calculator was developed.

RESULTS

There were 80 patients (60 females) with a mean age of 50 years. The ET group included 59 patients (74%), whereas the FET group included 21 patients (26%). Patient demographics, comorbidities, surgical history, and timing of leak diagnosis were used. Multivariable analysis resulted in 4 variables associated with higher probability of successful endoscopic leak management without need for additional surgery. These included increased age, lower BMI, lack of previous bariatric surgery, and quicker identification of the leak. Consequently, a scoring nomogram was developed with values from 0 to 22.

CONCLUSION

Our data show the development of a scoring calculator capable of quantifying the likelihood of success treating foregut and bariatric leaks with endoscopic therapies. This can be used clinically to guide treatment decisions.

Current status in endoscopic management of upper gastrointestinal perforations, leaks and fistulas

Recent advancement in endoscopic closure techniques have revolutionized the treatment of gastrointestinal perforations, leaks and fistulas. Traditionally, these have been managed surgically. The treatment strategy depends on the size and location of the defect, degree of contamination, presence of healthy surrounding tissues, patients' condition and the availability of expertise. One of the basic principles of management includes providing a barricade to the flow of luminal contents across the defect. This can be achieved with a wide range of endoscopic techniques. These include endoclips, stenting, suturing, tissue adhesives and glue, and endoscopic vacuum therapy. Each method has their distinct indications and shortcomings. Often, a combination of these techniques is required. Apart from endoscopic closure, drainage procedures by the interventional radiologist and surgical management also play an important role. In this review article, the outcomes of each of these endoscopic closure techniques in the literature is provided in tables, and practical management algorithms are being proposed.

A Comprehensive Review of Endoscopic Management of Sleeve Gastrectomy Leaks

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery leaks result in significant morbidity and mortality. Experts report variable therapeutic approaches, without uniform guidelines or consensus.

OBJECTIVE

To review the pathogenesis, risk factors, prevention, and treatment of gastric sleeve leaks, with a focus on endoscopic approaches. In addition, the efficacy and success rates of different treatment modalities are assessed.

DESIGN

A comprehensive review was conducted using a thorough literature search of 5 online electronic databases (PubMed, PubMed Central, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Web of Science) from the time of their inception through March 2020. Studies evaluating gastric sleeve leaks were included. MeSH terms related to "endoscopic," "leak," "sleeve," "gastrectomy," "anastomotic," and "bariatric" were applied to a highly sensitive search strategy. The main outcomes were epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Literature search yielded 2418 studies of which 438 were incorporated into the review. Shock and peritonitis necessitate early surgical intervention for leaks. Endoscopic therapies in acute and early leaks involve modalities with a focus on one of: (i) defect closure, (ii) wall diversion, or (iii) wall exclusion. Surgical revision is required if endoscopic therapies fail to control leaks after 6 months. Chronic leaks require one or more endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical approaches for fluid collection drainage to facilitate adequate healing. Success rates depend on provider and center expertise.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic management of leaks post sleeve gastrectomy is a minimally invasive and effective alternative to surgery. Their effect may vary based on clinical presentation, timing or leak morphology, and should be tailored to the appropriate endoscopic modality of treatment.

Indications and Outcomes of Conversion of Sleeve Gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Systematic Review and a Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most performed bariatric procedure. Conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) for SG-related complications such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), insufficient weight loss (ISWL), and weight regain (WR) is increasing. Our aim was to investigate the safety, efficacy, and outcomes of conversion from SG to RYGB.

METHODS

A literature search was performed from database inception to May 2020. Eligible studies must report indications for conversion, %total body weight loss (%TWL), and/or complications. The pooled mean or proportion were analyzed using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Seventeen unique studies (n = 556, 68.7% female, average age at time of conversion 42.6 ± 10.29 years) were included. The pooled conversion rate due to GERD was 30.4% (95% CI 23.5, 38.3%; I² = 63.9%), compared to 52.0% (95% CI 37.0, 66.6%; I² = 85.89%) due to ISWL/WR. The pooled baseline BMI at conversion was 38.5 kg/m² (95% CI 36.49, 40.6 kg/m²; I² = 92.1%) and after 1 year was 32.1 kg/m² (95% CI 25.50, 38.7 kg/m²; I² = 94.53%). The pooled %TWL after 1 year was 22.8% (95% CI 13.5, 32.1%; I² = 98.05%). Complication rate within 30 days was 16.4% (95% CI 11.1, 23.6%; I² = 57.17%), and after 30 days was 11.4% (95% CI 7.7, 16.7%; I² = 0%).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis showed that conversion from SG to RYGB is an option for conversion at a bariatric care center that produces sufficient weight loss outcomes, and potential resolution of symptoms of GERD. Further indication-based studies are required to obtain a clearer consensus on the surgical management of patients seeking RYGB following SG.

Endoscopic Management of Staple Line Leak after Bariatric Surgery: Surgeon's Perspective

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become a standalone primary procedure as a bariatric metabolic surgery since the early 2000s. The overall complication rate of LSG is reported to range from 2% to 15%. Staple line leakage (SLL) remains a major adverse event and occurs in approximately 1–6% of patients. Choosing the optimal treatment modality is a complex process. Clinicians must understand that nutritional support and drainage of fluid collection are essential for initial management. Conservative endoscopic management and sufficient drainage can resolve approximately 70% of SLLs. Endoscopic management of bariatric complications has been rapidly evolving in recent years and can be considered in all patients who are hemodynamically stable. We will review the available endoscopic management techniques, including stent placement (self-expanding stents and bariatric-specific stents), clipping, tissue sealant application, and internal drainage (double-pigtail stents [DPS] placement, endoscopic vacuum therapy, and septotomy). Stent placement remains the mainstream treatment for SLLs. However, healing with stents requires multiple sessions/stents and a long course of recovery. Endoscopic internal drainage is gaining popularity and has the potential to be a superior method. The importance of early intervention and combined endoscopic methods should be recognized.

Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for the Treatment of Leak Following Sleeve Gastrectomy

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is estimated to be its most severe complication. An aggressive management with surgical reconstructive procedures can be proposed in patients in whom all the conservative endoscopic techniques fail. The purpose of the present study was to report our experience with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) as treatment for the chronic leak after LSG.

METHODS

Between January 2013 and July 2019, 17 consecutive patients underwent RYGBP for the treatment of chronic leak after LSG. The initial intervention, the endoscopic approach and the definitive surgical repair were carefully reviewed.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients (13 women) with a median age of 39 years (24-67) with a median body mass index (BMI) of 40 kg/m² (30-52) underwent RYGBP for persistent fistula. Sixteen patients had their early LSG performed in another hospital. Eleven patients had an initial endoscopic treatment by pigtail drains following laparoscopic drainage and 6 other patients had the endoscopic stent as the first-choice line treatment. The overall average fistula diagnosis was done at 7.7 months (2-49 months) for 12 patients. For the rest of five patients, the procedure was performed almost in the acute setting (< 30 days). All procedures were performed by laparotomy but one. Five patients had a gastrojejunal anastomosis leak diagnosed by salivary flow in the drainage, but all patients were treated conservatively. No post-operative mortality was recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery should be considered in case of failure of the endoscopic treatment of chronic leak after LSG. Further research is needed to clearly identify the appropriate treatment, but in our experience, RYGBP approach including the leak site offers a low morbidity rate.

Outcome and Adverse Events of Endoscopic Bariatric Stents for Management of Leakage after Bariatric Surgery

INTRODUCTION

Bariatric leakage (BL) is a serious complication with a variety in available treatment options. Endoscopic stenting is preferred because of its minimally invasive nature in morbidly obese patients. Various modifications have been applied to stents since its use in palliation of malignant strictures. Few studies have exclusively evaluated the efficacy of bariatric stents in management BL.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of patients with BL managed by bariatric stents in the period between July 2014 and January 2019. The primary outcome was the clinical success in healing of leakage and secondary outcomes included adverse events (AEs), hospital stay and procedure-related mortality.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were included in this study. Clinical success occurred in 33 patients (73.3%). There was no stent-related mortality. The most frequent stent-related complications were reflux (62.2%), intolerance (55.6%), and migration (17.8%). Severe AEs occurred in 9 patients (20%). The overall complications rate was higher in diabetic patients (P = 0.048). Intolerance was significantly associated with shorter interval to management (P = 0.02). Stent migration was higher in male patients (P = 0.019) and higher BMI (P = 0.024).

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic stenting is a double-edged weapon that must be handled cautiously. It is a highly effective therapy, and early intervention is the main determinant of its efficacy. But it is not a treatment without complications (80%). The variant and high prevalence of complications mandates a strict follow-up throughout the stenting duration.

Staple Line Leaks Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Low Efficacy of the Over-the-Scope Clip

PURPOSE

The over-the-scope clip (OTSC) enables non-surgical management of gastrointestinal defects. The aim of this study was to report our experience with OTSC for patients with staple line leaks following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospectively maintained IRB-approved institutional database was queried for all patients treated with OTSC for staple line leaks following LSG from 2010 to 2018. Primary outcome was complete resolution of leak following OTSC. Secondary outcome was the number of additional procedures needed following OTSC.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients (13 males, 13 females) were treated with OTSC for staple line leaks following LSG. The median age was 35 years (range 18-62), and mean body mass index was 44 kg/m2. The median time from index operation to leak diagnosis and from leak diagnosis to OTSC was 18 days (range 2-118), and 6 days (range 1-120), respectively. The initial endoscopic treatment was OTSC (n = 19), stent (n = 5), clip (n = 1), and clip and biologic glue (n = 1). OTSC alone led to final resolution of leak in 8 patients (31%) within 43 days of clip deployment (range 5-87). Five leaks resolved after a combination of OTSC and stent (19%) and one leak (4%) resolved after endoscopic suturing following a failed OTSC. Eleven patients (42%) failed endoscopic management and underwent total gastrectomy and esophagojejunostomy. One mortality (4%) was noted. The number of additional endoscopic sessions ranged from 1 to 10 (median 2).

CONCLUSIONS

OTSC carries a low success rate for controlling staple line leaks following LSG.

Role of Primary Use of Mega Stents Alone and Combined with Other Endoscopic Procedures for Early Leak and Stenosis After Bariatric Surgery, Single-Institution Experience

PURPOSE

Surgical therapy for post-bariatric surgery complications is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Endoscopic options like primarily endoscopically placed fully covered self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) offer significant benefits for the management of leaks and obstructions or stenosis, and even in case of mega stent failure, further endoscopic techniques could resolve the situation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a single-centre retrospective study on patients with leakage and stenosis/obstruction after bariatric surgery who were managed primarily by SEMS between January 2015 and January 2019. Clinical success rate was evaluated in terms of the cure of the reason for stenting, the need for other interventions, and the presentation of stent-related complications.

RESULTS

There were 58 patients included, (50 with leak, 8 with stenosis/obstruction following bariatric surgery). Mean time to stent placement was 6.82 (±1.64) days for the leak group and 35 (±21.13) days for the stenosis group (p = 0.019). Successful outcomes with SEMS alone were achieved in 42 (72.41%) patients, while 16 patients had failed SEMS treatment, of whom 14 were successfully managed by endoscopic procedures while two cases needed surgical intervention. Of the SEMS-related complications encountered, 25.86% were ulcers; 24.13%, vomiting; 22.41%, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GerdQ≥8); 18.96%, stent migration; and 5.17%, stent intolerance.

CONCLUSION

A mega stent is an effective and safe tool for the early management of post-bariatric surgery leakage and stenosis, and it is associated with acceptable rates of failure that can be managed by further endoscopic techniques in most of the patients.

The evolution of surgical treatment for chronic leak following sleeve

BACKGROUND

Leak is estimated to be the most severe complication of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), with sporadic failure of endoscopic techniques. In such cases, an aggressive management with surgical reconstructive procedures can be proposed to patients in whom all the conservative endoscopic techniques failed.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the present study was to report our experience with surgical approach for the treatment of chronic leak after LSG.

SETTING

University hospital, France.

METHODS

Between January 2013-December 2019, 21 consecutive patients underwent reconstructive surgery for the treatment of chronic leak after LSG. The initial intervention, the endoscopic approach, and the definitive surgical repair were carefully reviewed.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients (17 women) with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of 42.7 years (9.81) and a mean (SD) body mass index (BMI) of 27.3 (5.2) kg/m² underwent reconstructive surgery for persistent fistula. Seventeen patients (81%) had their early LSG performed in another hospital. Endoscopic treatment was represented by the pigtail drain or stent in 9 cases each, ovesco in 8 cases, and glue for 2 patients. The reconstructive surgery was performed within 6 months in 8 cases; between 6-12 months in 6 cases; between 1-3 years in 4 cases, and >3 years in 3 cases. There were 14 fistulo-jejunostomy (66.7%), 5 Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (23.8%), and 2 total gastrectomies (9.5%). The operative time was between 99 minutes and 5.5 hours (mean = 216.2, median = 225 min). The hospital stay ranged from 5-30 days (mean = 12.67, median = 11 d) and the surgical reintervention rate was 23.8% (5/21 patients), including 1 case of recurrent hemorrhage requiring 3 surgical operations over 1 month of postoperative follow-up. No postoperative mortality was recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery should be considered in case of failure of the endoscopic treatment of chronic leak after LSG. Further research is needed to clearly identify the appropriate treatment, but in our experience the fistulo-jejunostomy approach shows a low morbidity rate. (Surg Obes Relat Dis 2020;17:278-283.) © 2020 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. All rights reserved.

Endoscopic management of leaks and fistulas after bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Endoscopic techniques have become the first-line therapy in bariatric surgery-related complications such as leaks and fistulas. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of self-expandable stents, clipping, and tissue sealants in closing of post-bariatric surgery leak/fistula.

Methods

A systematic literature search of the Medline/Scopus databases was performed to identify full-text articles published up to February 2019 on the use of self-expandable stents, clipping, or tissue sealants as primary endoscopic strategies used for leak/fistula closure. Meta-analysis of studies reporting stents was performed with the PRISMA guidelines.

Results

Data concerning the efficacy of self-expanding stents in the treatment of leaks/fistulas after bariatric surgery were extracted from 40 studies (493 patients). The overall proportion of successful leak/fistula closure was 92% (95% CI, 90–95%). The overall proportion of stent migration was 23% (95% CI, 19–28%). Seventeen papers (98 patients) reported the use of clipping: the over-the-scope clips (OTSC) system was used in 85 patients with a successful closure rate of 67.1% and a few complications (migration, stenosis, tear). The successful fistula/leak closure using other than OTSC types was achieved in 69.2% of patients. In 10 case series (63 patients), fibrin glue alone was used with a 92.8–100% success rate of fistula closure that usually required repeated sessions at scheduled intervals. The complications of fibrin glue applications were reported in only one study and included pain and fever in 12.5% of patients.

Conclusions

Endoscopic techniques are effective for management of post-bariatric leaks and fistulas in properly selected patients.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-020-07471-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A Complication of an Endoscopic Pigtail Stent Migration into the Cavity during Deployment as a Treatment for Gastric Leak

Gastric leak following gastrointestinal surgery is the most dreadful complication, which implies long hospital stay, morbidities, and not irrelevant mortalities. There is no standard recommendation for treating postlaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leak, which makes its management challenging. Endoscopic internal drainage by double-pigtail drains currently became the recommended approach. Complications to this approach include bleeding, ulceration at the tip of the double-pigtail stent, and uncommon migration. Here, we report our experience with drain displacement into the cavity while deployment in a patient who experienced gastric leakage after undergoing sleeve gastrectomy.

Predictors and outcomes of bleed after sleeve gastrectomy: an analysis of the MBSAQIP data registry

BACKGROUND

Bleeding after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is an important complication associated with significant morbidity and a drastic increase in healthcare resources. Multiple strategies have been developed to minimize bleeding, including varying bougie size, line reinforcement, and intra-operative tranexamic acid. These techniques, however, have been implemented without a clear understanding of the pre-, intra-, and postoperative predictors of bleeding in patients undergoing SG.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to examine predictors and outcomes associated with postoperative bleeding in patients undergoing LSG.

SETTING

The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement data registry.

METHODS

We identified Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement patients who underwent LSG in 2015 and 2016. Primary outcomes of interest include identifying the prevalence, impact, and predictors of bleeding in LSG patients. Our secondary outcomes of interest include characterizing overall complication rates in LSG patients. Univariate analysis of pre-, intra-, and postoperative variables was performed using Χ² tests for categorical data and independent sample t test for continuous data. A nonparsimonious multivariable logistic regression model was then developed to determine predictive factors for development of postoperative bleed.

RESULTS

A total of 175,353 patients underwent LSG from 2015 to 2016. The majority of patients were female (79.0%), with a mean age of 44.4 ± 12.0 years and a mean body mass index of 45.2 kg/m² ± standard deviation of 7.9 kg/m². A total of 1116 (.6%) patients had a postoperative bleed. Bleeding was associated with a mortality of 1.0% versus .1% among patients without bleeding. The mean operative time was 74.0 ± 36.6 minutes with a mean bougie size of 36.9 ± 2.9 Fr, and a mean pylorus distance of 4.80 ± 1.1 cm. Staple-line reinforcement was used in 67.8% of patients while 22.4% were oversewn. Bleeds were associated with a statistically significant increase in all complications, readmission, reoperation, and mortality rates at 30 days. The following statistically significant independent predictors of bleed after LSG were identified using multivariable logistic regression analysis: bougie size, age, prior cardiac procedure, hypertension, renal insufficiency, therapeutic anticoagulation, diabetes, obstructive sleep apnea, and operative length. Staple-line reinforcement, staple-line oversewing, and higher body mass index were found to be protective for bleed after adjusting for confounders and interactions. An increase in pylorus distance did show a signal toward a protective effect; however, this was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Bleeding after LSG is associated with increased complications, readmission and reoperation rates, and mortality at 30 days. Staple-line reinforcement techniques independently predict a lower risk of postoperative bleeding after LSG. Adoption of these techniques may therefore have an important role in reducing morbidity and mortality for patients who undergo LSG.

Efficacy of Postoperative Upper Gastrointestinal Series (UGI) and Computed Tomography (CT) Scan in Bariatric Surgery: a Meta-analysis on 7516 Patients

BACKGROUND

To demonstrate the lack of utility and efficacy of routine early postoperative upper gastrointestinal study (UGI) in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery and to show the higher efficacy of CT scan in cases of clinical suspicion of a leakage, a meta-analysis was performed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search including articles published in last 18 years was performed. For both UGI and CT scan, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. A first analysis considered overall patients, and a second analysis considered only symptomatic patients.

RESULTS

Starting from 1233 eligible citations, 18 articles, including 7516 patients, were left. The pooled sensitivity was 54% for UGI (95% CI 34-74) with a high heterogeneity (I2 = 99.8%, p < .001), whereas CT scan showed a pooled sensitivity of 91% (95% CI 89-93) significantly higher than sensitivity of UGI series (p < 0.01), with a high heterogeneity (I2 = 98.9%, p < .001). In symptomatic patients the pooled sensitivity of UGI series was significantly lower than sensitivity of CT scan [49% (95% CI 31-68) vs 94% (95% CI 92-96), p < 0.01]. PPV showed a significant difference between UGI series and CT scan (54 vs 100%, p < 0.01). Specificity for UGI series was 98.6%, and specificity for CT scan was 99.7% (p = ns); the mean NPV was 96 and 98% for UGI series and CT scan (p = ns).

CONCLUSIONS

According to our results, a CT scan triggered by clinical suspicion must be considered the first-line procedure to detect a postoperative leak following primary sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Reinforcement of the Staple Line during Gastric Sleeve: A Comparison of Buttressing or Oversewing, versus No Reinforcement- A Single-Institution Study

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a well-established treatment for morbid obesity. Staple line leak (SLL) remains one of the most serious and life-threatening complications after LSG; however, no consensus exists for prevention. The purpose of this study is to review and compare the different methods of staple line management used at our institution. Retrospective review of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors was performed for all patients undergoing LSG at a single institution between September 2010 and August 2015. Primary outcome measure was SLL by reinforcement method (none/Seamguard/Oversewing). A total of 256 patients undergoing LSG were included, 197 (76.95%) were women and 233 (87.11%) were whites. The patients had a mean age of 44.64 years and body mass index of 49.24 kg/m22. Among those patients, 145 (56.64%) had staple line reinforced with suture (28, 10.94%) or Gore Seamguard (115, 44.92%) and 111 (43.36%) had no reinforcement, with no difference in baseline factors between the groups (all P > 0.05). Gastric leaks were identified in nine patients (3.52%) with no difference between reinforcement (2.7 vs 2.1%, P = 0.54) or leak test method (air vs methylene blue). However, oversewing the staple line was associated with higher incidence of stenosis ( P < 0.01). SLL after LSG is a serious complication with significant morbidity and mortality. This study demonstrated that staple line reinforcement does not provide significant leak reduction but does reduce intra-operative staple line bleeding. In addition, oversewing the staple line was associated with postoperative sleeve stenosis without added benefits.

Management of gastric fistula complicating laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with biological glue in a combined percutaneous and endoscopic approach

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is considered as a first line treatment for morbid obesity around the globe. Leakage and subsequent gastric fistula is the most dreadful complication, which may lead to serious morbidity and even mortality.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety and efficacy of fibrin glue application in the setting of gastric fistula after LSG.

SETTING

University hospital, Israel.

METHODS

Twenty-four morbidly obese patients (mean age = 42.2 yr, mean body mass index = 42 kg/m²) developed gastric fistula after LSG. The fistula was acute in 10 patients, subacute in 9, and chronic in 5. Sixteen patients (67%) have had previous failed endoscopic interventions. Fibrin glue was applied percutaneously with fluoroscopic guidance, under endoscopic visualization. A pigtail drain was left in the distal tract to monitor and manage possible continuous leakage.

RESULTS

There were no complications except abdominal pain in 2 patients associated with fever in 1. Both resolved within 1 to 2 days. Fistula closure was achieved in all patients but 1 (95.8%). Closure was accomplished after a single application in 9 patients (39%), 2 applications in 8, 3 applications in 3, 5 applications in 2, and 6 applications in 1. All patients were followed with a mean time of 42.3 months (range, 20-46).

CONCLUSIONS

Although in most patients there was a need for multiple applications, our experience indicates that percutaneous fluoroscopic application of Fibrin glue under endoscopic visualization proved to be a simple, tolerable, and highly effective method for the treatment of selected patients with gastric fistula after LSG.

Efficacy and Safety of the Over-the-Scope Clip (OTSC) System in the Management of Leak and Fistula After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic management of leaks/fistulas after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is gaining popularity in the bariatric surgery.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to review the efficacy and safety of over-the-scope-clip (OTSC) system in endoscopic closure of post-LSG leak/fistula.

METHODS

PubMed/Medline and major journals of the field were systematically reviewed for studies on endoscopic closure of post-LSG leaks/fistula by means of the OTSC system.

RESULTS

A total of ten eligible studies including 195 patients with post-LSG leaks/fistula were identified. The time between LSG and leak/fistula ranged from 1 day to 803 days. Most of the leaks/fistula were located at the proximal staple line, and they sized from 3 to 20 mm. Time between leak diagnosis and OTSC clipping ranged from 0 to 271 days. Thirty-three out of 53 patients (63.5%) required one clip for closure of the lesion. Regarding the OTSC-related complications, a leak occurred in five patients (9.3%) and OTSC migration, stenosis, and tear each in one patient (1.8%). Of the 73 patients with post-LSG leak treated with OTSC, 63 patients had an overall successful closure (86.3%).

CONCLUSION

OTSC system is a promising endoscopic approach for management of post-LSG leaks in appropriately selected patients. Unfortunately, most studies are series with a small sample size, short-term follow-up, and mixed data of concomitant procedures with OTSC. Further studies should distinguish the net efficacy of the OTSC system from other concomitant procedures in treatment of post-LSG leak.

Self-Expanding Biodegradable Stents for Postoperative Upper Gastrointestinal Issues

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Endoscopic stenting is a minimally invasive treatment modality for patients with various gastrointestinal conditions. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of uncovered biodegradable stents for postoperative leaks and strictures in the upper gastrointestinal tract.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients treated endoscopically with biodegradable stents from January 2010 through November 2017.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were enrolled, 7 of whom were men. Their mean age was 46 (range, 21-82) years. The indications for stent placement were postoperative leakage and stricture in 9 and 4 patients, respectively. The primary diagnoses were obesity in 7 patients, gastric cancer in 5, and peptic ulcer in 1. The average time to stent placement after surgery was 35 (range, 17-125) and 166 (range, 153-185) days for patients with postoperative leakage and stricture, respectively. Stent insertion was successful at the first attempt in all patients. Complete resolution of the leak and stricture was achieved after stent application in 11 patients, for a clinical success rate of 85%. The mean follow-up duration was 50 (range, 24-76) months. There were no major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to self-expanding metal and plastic stents, the main advantages of uncovered biodegradable stents are that they do not have to be removed and have a low migration rate. Our results suggest that these stents have promise for management of postoperative gastrointestinal complications. Further randomized trials with larger sample sizes are necessary to determine the role of biodegradable stents in the treatment algorithm.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of stent type in endoscopic treatment of gastric leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

Background

Gastric leak is the most feared surgical postoperative complication after sleeve gastrectomy. An endoscopic procedure is usually required to treat the leak. No data are available on the cost-effectiveness of different stent types in this procedure.

Methods

Between April 2005 and July 2016, patients with a confirmed gastric leak undergoing endoscopic treatment using a covered stent (CS) or double-pigtail stent (DPS) were included. The primary objective of the study was to assess overall costs of the stent types after primary sleeve gastrectomy. Secondary objectives were the cost-effectiveness of each stent type expressed as an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER); the incremental net benefit; the probability of efficiency, defined as the probability of being cost-effective at a threshold of €30 000, and identification of the key drivers of ICER derived from a multivariable analysis.

Results

One hundred and twelve patients were enrolled. The overall mean costs of gastric leak were €22 470; the mean(s.d.) cost was €24 916(12 212) in the CS arm and €20 024(3352) in the DPS arm (P = 0·018). DPS was more cost-effective than CS (ICER €4743 per endoscopic procedure avoided), with an incremental net benefit of €25 257 and a 27 per cent probability of efficiency. Key drivers of the ICER were the inpatient ward after diagnosis of gastric leak (surgery versus internal medicine), type of institution (private versus public) and duration of hospital stay per endoscopic procedure.

Conclusion

DPS for the treatment of gastric leak is more cost-effective than CS and should be proposed as the standard regimen whenever possible.

Staple Line Reinforcement in Laparoscopic SleeveGastrectomy: Experience in 1023 Consecutive Cases

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is one of the most frequently performed bariatric procedures performed worldwide. However, staple line-related complications have become a major challenge for bariatric surgeons. The aim of this study was to evaluate the morbidity in a cohort of patients who underwent LSG with imbricated oversewing of the staple line at a single high-volume center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data for all patients who underwent LSG to treat obesity at our institution from January 2010 to September 2016. All practitioners had undergone training with a single senior bariatric surgeon using oversewing as staple line reinforcement (SLR).

RESULTS

In total, 1023 LSGs were performed (female, 67.3%; mean age, 40.6 ± 10.8 years; median preoperative body mass index, 37 ± 4.5 kg/m²). The mean operative time was 67.6 ± 23.4 min (range, 30-150 min). The rate of conversion to open surgery was 0.3%. Early complications were noted in 18 patients (1.8%), including 5 cases of bleeding (0.5%). No leaks, stenosis, or mortality occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

LSG is a safe technique, but staple line-associated complications can be life-threatening. In this series, no leaks occurred from the very beginning of the surgeons' experience in LSG. Imbricated oversewing of the staple line, proper mentoring, and performance of surgery in appropriate settings are good approaches to decreasing complications.

Endoscopic management of a gastric leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy using the over-the-scope-clip (Ovesco®) system

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is currently used for the management of morbid obesity. Gastric fistula is the primary life-threatening complication, and its resolution continues to be a strong challenge for surgeons. Multiple treatment options are available, ranging from conservative therapy to endoscopic use of clips or stents, and even surgical reoperation involving total gastrectomy or conversion to a different bariatric technique. The applicability of each individual option will depend on the type of fistula and the patient clinical status. A clinical case is reported of a 29-year-old male patient with a body mass index at 49% who following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy had a delayed gastric fistula that failed to respond to conservative management but was successfully treated using the over-the-scope clip (Ovesco®) system.

Technical Details of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Leading to Lowered Leak Rate: Discussion of 1070 Consecutive Cases

Introduction

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is a widely utilized and effective surgical procedure for dramatic weight loss in obese patients. Leak at the sleeve staple line is the most serious complication of this procedure, occurring in 1–3% of cases. Techniques to minimize the risk of sleeve gastrectomy leaks have been published although no universally agreed upon set of techniques exists. This report describes a single-surgeon experience with an approach to sleeve leak prevention resulting in a progressive decrease in leak rate over 5 years.

Methods

1070 consecutive sleeve gastrectomy cases between 2012 and 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. Patient characteristics, sleeve leaks, and percent body weight loss at 6 months were reported for each year. Conceptual and technical changes aimed towards leak reduction are presented.

Results

With the implementation of the described techniques of the sleeve gastrectomy, the rate of sleeve leaks fell from 4% in 2012 to 0% in 2015 and 2016 without a significant change in weight loss, as depicted by 6-month change in body weight and percent excess BMI lost.

Conclusion

In this single-surgeon experience, sleeve gastrectomy leak rate has fallen to 0% since the implementation of specific technical modifications in the procedure.

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Changes in the Last Decade: Differences in Morbidity and Weight Loss

PURPOSE

Aim is to report the learning curve and standardization process of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG), describing the evolution in surgical technique and patient management in the authors' experiences.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-seven patients were divided in three Groups (A, B, and C), based on bougie size and technical details, and included 36, 46, and 45 patients, respectively.

RESULTS

Mean operative time in Groups A, B, and C was 201.5, 150.8, and 172 minutes, respectively. Conversion to open surgery occurred in 1 Group A case. Eleven postoperative complications (8.6%) were observed (1 Group A, 8 Group B, 2 and Group C). Mean hospital stay in Groups A, B, and C, was 7.1, 6.9, and 3.1 days, respectively. At a mean follow-up of 69.7 months (Group A), 33.3 months (Group B), and 14.8 months (Group C), mean postoperative body mass index is 32.6, 28.1, and 31.5 kg/m², respectively. Percentage estimated body mass index loss (%EBMIL) was 74.8% for Group A, 85.7% for Group B, and 68.1% for Group C.

CONCLUSIONS

LSG is a safe and effective procedure. In the postoperative course, meticulous alertness to early warning signs of sepsis and aggressive patient management are mandatory to prevent mortality. The use of a larger bougie size was associated with weight regain.

Value of routine upper gastrointestinal swallow study after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Gastric leak (GL) is one of the main early-onset postoperative complications of sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Many institutions perform routine upper gastrointestinal (UGI) contrast studies within 24 hours of surgery, looking for GL or gastric stenosis and to determine the need for urgent re-exploration, but this examination delays oral feeding, can cause side effects and is responsible for systematic and probably unnecessary irradiation of the patient.

OBJECTIVE

Determine the efficacy of routine UGI contrast studies to predict postoperative complications after SG in a large population.

SETTING

University hospital, France, public practice.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study consisted of retrospective review of a prospective database of a cohort of patients who underwent primary SG between January 2007 and August 2013 (n = 1137). Routine UGI contrast studies, performed on postoperative day 1, were independently reviewed by 2 radiologists. The primary endpoint of the study was the effect of routine UGI contrast study on detecting postoperative complications. The secondary endpoints were comparison of the findings of routine UGI contrast study and abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan, sensitivity, and specificity of different imaging signs on abdominal CT scan in the presence of GL, evaluation of the SG learning curve based on the findings of routine UGI contrast studies.

RESULTS

A total of 1137 patients underwent primary SG and 30 GL (2.6%) with a mean time to diagnosis of 23.4 days (1-245) and 15 cases of gastric stenosis (1.3%) were observed during the study period. Routine UGI study was performed in 1108 patients, whereas 29 patients were assessed by first-line CT scan. None of the 1108 UGI studies found a GL or gastric stenosis. In the 30 cases of GL, the most sensitive and specific sign was the presence of perigastric abscess without contrast material leak (sensitivity: 56.6%; specificity: 95%). The mean time interval between routine postoperative UGI contrast study and abdominal CT scan was 12.9 days (0-86). Uniform gastric shape was acquired after 30-32 SG procedures.

CONCLUSION

Routine postoperative UGI on postoperative day 1 is of limited value after SG. Abdominal CT scan should be preferred in the presence of clinical suspicion of postoperative complications. Selective UGI contrast study remains indicated when gastric stenosis is suspected and at the beginning of the SG learning curve.

Evolution of endoscopic treatment of sleeve gastrectomy leaks: from partially covered to long, fully covered stents

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has become a widely accepted option in the treatment of morbid obesity. Gastric leaks after SG occur in .9%-2.2% of the patients, mostly at the gastroesophageal junction. The current treatment algorithm includes drainage, antibiotics, nutritional support, and endoluminal control.

OBJECTIVES

Our hypothesis is that long, fully covered stents represent a safe, effective solution for SG leaks.

SETTING

University hospital.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of our prospectively collected bariatric database was performed between June 2014 and May 2016. We included all patients treated for leaks after SG. Endoscopic treatment included partially covered metallic stent (Wallstent, Boston Scientific, Galway, Ireland), fully covered stent (Mega stent, Taewoong Medical Industries, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea), over-the-scope clip (Ovesco Endoscopy, Tubingen, Germany), and internal pigtail drainage.

RESULTS

A total of 872 SGs were performed. Overall, 10 of 872 patients (1.1%) developed a gastric leak. One patient was an outside referral. The 11 patients underwent endoscopic treatment accompanied by either percutaneous or laparoscopic abscess drainage. Endoscopic fistula closure at the gastroesophageal junction was achieved in 10 of 11 cases and the average time for closure was 9.9 (range: 4-24) weeks. One patient developed a second leak in the antrum, treated by subtotal gastrectomy. Overall, treatment with Wallstent failed in 3 of 5 patients, and these patients were eventually successfully treated with a Mega stent. The initial use of long, fully covered stents was successful in 5 of 6 cases.

CONCLUSION

Long, fully covered stents appear to be a good alternative to traditional stents either as primary treatment or after failure of other endoscopic treatments.

Gastroesophageal stenting for the management of post sleeve gastrectomy leak. A single institution experience

OBJECTIVES

To retrospectively evaluate the effectiveness of gastroesophageal stenting for post sleeve gastrectomy staple line leaks using removable self-expandable stents.

METHODS

Between April 2012 and June 2015, 12 consecutive patients (6 males) with mean age of 34 years (21-38 years) presented with staple line leak 1-8 weeks after the operation (mean 2.8 weeks). Patients underwent gastroesophageal stenting by interventional radiology. A total of 23 stents were deployed with mean length of 17.8 cm (7-24 cm) and mean diameter 25.6 mm (18-36 mm). Stent re-insertion was needed in 7 patients (9 procedure), while 6 patients required percutaneous collection drainage and 3 patients required endoscopic glue injection with clipping. Two stent removal procedures were carried out under endoscopic visualization after failed stent capture under fluoroscopy, while the remaining stents were successfully removed by interventional radiology. Results: Stent placement was technically successful in all patients. Stent migration occurred in 6 patients (50%). There is a tendency for stent migration with shorter stent length (R= -0.557, p=0.008). The mean duration of stenting was 60.5 days (14-137 days). All patients underwent stent removal and resumed oral intake with no recurrence of leak at a mean follow up time of 190 days (14-410 days). Complications included gastrointestinal bleeding (n=1), proximal esophageal stricture (n=1) and stent occlusion (n=1).

CONCLUSION

Gastroesophageal stenting as a primary measure after diagnosis of early post sleeve gastrectomy leak appears to offer a safe and effective alternative option in obviating repeat surgical interventions. Minimally invasive interventions may still be required for the management of persistent leak.

[Management of failures and complications in weight loss surgery]

The specific management of the surgical risks linked to obesity, as well as technological advances combined with the standardisation of techniques, have significantly reduced the morbidity and mortality associated with bariatric surgery over recent decades. However, as with all surgery, patients are exposed to medical and surgical failures and complications.

Endoscopy after bariatric surgery

Obesity is a global epidemic with significant morbidity and mortality. Weight loss results in reduction of health risks and improvement in quality of life, thus representing a goal of paramount importance. Bariatric surgery is the most efficacious choice compared to conservative alternatives including diet, exercise, drugs and behavioral modification to treat obese patients. Following bariatric operations, patients may present with upper gastrointestinal tract complaints that warrant endoscopic evaluation and the various bariatric surgery types are often linked to complications. A subset of these complications necessitates endoscopic interventions for accurate diagnosis and effective, minimal invasive treatment. This review aims to highlight the role of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients who have undergone bariatric surgery to evaluate and potentially treat surgery-related complications and upper gastrointestinal symptoms.

Acute Leaks Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Early Surgical Repair According to a Management Algorithm

INTRODUCTION

Despite leakages remaining a worrisome complication, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become the preferred choice for most bariatric surgeons in Italy. In light of the emerging trend to discharge patients on postoperative day (POD) 1 or to consider LSG as an outpatient procedure, we felt it useful in selected cases to define a treatment protocol aimed to manage patients presenting with an acute postoperative leakage.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Starting from 2007, 295 LSGs have been performed at our institution. Six patients, including 5 from our series (1.6%), were treated for a leak. The first patient presented a leak on POD 3, whereas the next 2 patients were re-admitted on POD 11 and 12, respectively. They all underwent a conservative treatment. The last 3 patients, according to a suggested algorithm, underwent a prompt surgical repair.

RESULTS

The conservatively treated patients were discharged following 22 ± 7.7 days, whereas patients treated by surgery were discharged following 10 ± 0.8 days (P = .09). By not considering the cost of primary LSG, which is about 5600 € in our region, the expense for every patient treated by re-intervention was about 2500 €. The cost for each patient treated by stenting was about 4700 €. The cost for each patient treated conservatively was about 5700 €.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our series and in agreement with published data, it is reasonable in selected cases to consider a wider role for early surgery. A timely surgical approach following an appropriate algorithm may offer a resolutive and cost-effective answer to the management of acute leaks following LSG.

Management of gastric leaks after sleeve gastrectomy with endoluminal vacuum (E-Vac) therapy

BACKGROUND

Sleeve gastrectomy has become a popular weight loss procedure, but it is associated with staple line leak resulting in high morbidity and mortality. Current management options range from endoscopic techniques (predominantly stent placement) to surgical intervention.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to recognize endoluminal vacuum (E-Vac) therapy as a viable option for use in anastomotic leaks of sleeve gastrectomies.

SETTING

This study took place at Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas, Texas.

METHODS

Retrospective and prospectively gathered registries for use of E-Vac therapy were queried to identify 35 patients. Using upper gastrointestinal series (UGI) and esophagogastroduodenoscopy, 9 of these patients were identified with a staple line leak from laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). E-Vac therapy was used to resolve the leak.

RESULTS

Nine patients were treated with E-Vac therapy. Eight of 9 patients were admitted from outside hospitals with a mean of 61 days (5-233) after LSG. During treatment, an average of 10.3 procedures per patient was done to place and exchange the Endo-SPONGE. All 9 patients had resolution of leaks confirmed by upper gastrointestinal series, after undergoing E-Vac therapy for an average of 50 days. Six of 9 patients had laparoscopic procedures before their admission. During admission, 5 of the 9 patients had self-expanding metal stents placed with failure of leak resolution. Discharge disposition included 2 patients sent to rehabilitation facilities, 1 death not attributable to E-Vac, and 6 patients went home.

CONCLUSION

E-Vac therapy is a viable option for patients with staple line leak after LSG.