1
|
Visaggi P, Ghisa M, Barberio B, Chiu PW, Ishihara R, Kohn GP, Morozov S, Thompson SK, Wong I, Hassan C, Savarino EV. Gastro-esophageal diagnostic workup before bariatric surgery or endoscopic treatment for obesity: position statement of the International Society of Diseases of the Esophagus. Dis Esophagus 2024; 37:doae006. [PMID: 38281990 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doae006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
Obesity is a chronic and multifactorial condition characterized by abnormal weight gain due to excessive adipose tissue accumulation that represents a growing worldwide challenge for public health. In addition, obese patients have an increased risk of hiatal hernia, esophageal, and gastric dysfunction, as well as gastroesophageal reflux disease, which has a prevalence over 40% in those seeking endoscopic or surgical intervention. Surgery has been demonstrated to be the most effective treatment for severe obesity in terms of long-term weight loss, comorbidities, and quality of life improvements and overall mortality decrease. The recent emergence of bariatric endoscopic techniques promises less invasive, more cost-effective, and reproducible approaches to the treatment of obesity. With the endorsement of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, we started a Delphi process to develop consensus statements on the most appropriate diagnostic workup to preoperatively assess gastroesophageal function before bariatric surgical or endoscopic interventions. The Consensus Working Group comprised 11 international experts from five countries. The group consisted of gastroenterologists and surgeons with a large expertise with regard to gastroesophageal reflux disease, bariatric surgery and endoscopy, and physiology. Ten statements were selected, on the basis of the agreement level and clinical relevance, which represent an evidence and experience-based consensus of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierfrancesco Visaggi
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Matteo Ghisa
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Brigida Barberio
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Philip W Chiu
- Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Ryu Ishihara
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Geoffrey P Kohn
- Department of Surgery, Monash University Eastern Health Clinical School, Melbourne, Australia
- Melbourne Upper GI Surgical Group, c/o Cabrini Hospital, Malvern, Australia
| | - Sergey Morozov
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Federal Research Center of Nutrition, Biotechnology and Food Safety, Moscow, Russia
| | - Sarah K Thompson
- College of Medicine & Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Australia
| | - Ian Wong
- Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy
| | - Edoardo Vincenzo Savarino
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
- Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedale Università of Padua, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liang Y, Wang C, Yang L, Yang K, Zhang S, Xie W. Nonsurgical risk factors for marginal ulcer following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 14 cohort studies. Int J Surg 2024; 110:1793-1799. [PMID: 38320087 PMCID: PMC10942228 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000001042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS Marginal ulcer (MU) is a common complication of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB). The primary goal of this meta-analysis was to identify potential risk factors for MU post-RYGB. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted on four databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library) to identify articles published from inception to 23 May 2023 that reported risk factors linked to ulcer occurrence post-RYGB. Hazard Ratio (HR) and Odds Ratio (OR) with respective 95% CI were calculated to estimate the impact of selected risk factors on MU. The risk factors were evaluated through multivariate analyses. The estimated risk factors were subjected to a random-effects model. Subgroup analysis based on study baseline characteristics and leave-one-out sensitivity analysis were also performed to investigate the potential sources of heterogeneity and assess the robustness of the findings. RESULT Herein, 14 observational studies involving 77 250 patients were included. Diabetes, smoking, and steroid use were identified to be risk factors of MU, with pooled ORs of (1.812; 95% CI: 1.226-2.676; P =0.003), (3.491; 95% CI: 2.204-5.531; P< 0.001), and (2.804; 95% CI: 1.383-5.685; P =0.004), respectively. Other risk factors, such as alcohol consumption, male sex, and PPI use, were deemed not significant due to differences in data acquisition and effect estimates. CONCLUSION Diabetes, smoking, and steroid use were identified as independent risk factors of MU. Enhancing awareness of these identified risk factors will lead to more effective preoperative prevention and targeted postoperative interventions for patients undergoing RYGB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Wenbiao Xie
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang City, Hunan Province, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Salame M, Jawhar N, Belluzzi A, Al-Kordi M, Storm AC, Abu Dayyeh BK, Ghanem OM. Marginal Ulcers after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Management. J Clin Med 2023; 12:4336. [PMID: 37445371 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 06/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Marginal ulcer (MU) is a potential complication following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), with a mean prevalence of 4.6%. Early identification and prompt intervention are crucial to mitigating further complications. The pathophysiology of MU is complex and involves multiple factors, including smoking, Helicobacter pylori infection, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use, and larger pouch size. Patients with MU may experience acute or chronic abdominal pain. Rarely, they may present with a complication from the ulceration, such as bleeding, perforation, or strictures. Following diagnosis by endoscopy, management of MU typically involves modification of risk factors and medical therapy focused on proton pump inhibitors. In case of complicated ulcers, surgical intervention is often required for the repair of the perforation or resection of the stricture. For recurrent or recalcitrant ulcers, endoscopic coverage of the ulcer bed, resection of the anastomosis, and abdominal or thoracoscopic truncal vagotomy may be considered. This review aims at providing an overview of the etiology, diagnosis, and management of MU after RYGB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marita Salame
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Noura Jawhar
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15224, USA
| | - Amanda Belluzzi
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | | | - Andrew C Storm
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Barham K Abu Dayyeh
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Omar M Ghanem
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Giannopoulos S, Athanasiadis DI, Clapp B, Lyo V, Ghanem O, Puzziferri N, Stefanidis D. Proton pump inhibitor prophylaxis after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: A national survey of surgeon practices. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2023; 19:303-308. [PMID: 36379840 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2022] [Revised: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are frequently used after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) to prevent marginal ulceration. The optimal duration of PPI treatment after surgery to minimize ulcer development is unclear. OBJECTIVES Assess bariatric surgeon practice variability regarding postoperative PPI prophylaxis. SETTING Survey of medical directors of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program-accredited centers. METHODS Members of the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery research committee developed and administered a web-based anonymous survey in November 2021 to bariatric surgeons of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program-accredited programs detailing questions related to surgeons' use of PPI after RYGB including patient selection, medication, dosage, and treatment duration. RESULTS The survey was completed by 112 surgeons (response rate: 52.6%). PPIs were prescribed by 85.4% of surgeons for all patients during their hospitalization, 3.9% for selective patients, and 10.7% not at all. After discharge, 90.3% prescribed PPIs. Pantoprazole was most often used during hospitalization (38.5%), while omeprazole was most prescribed (61.7%) after discharge. The duration of postoperative PPI administration varied; it was 3 months in 43.6%, 1 month in 20.2%, and 6 months in 18.6% of patients. Finally, surgeons' practice setting and case volume were not associated with the duration of prophylactic PPI administration after RYGB. CONCLUSIONS PPI administration practices vary widely among surgeons after RYGB, which may be related to the limited comparative evidence and guidelines on best duration of PPI administration. Large prospective clinical trials with objective outcome measures are needed to define optimal practices for PPI prophylaxis after RYGB to maximize clinical benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Benjamin Clapp
- Paul Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech HSC, El Paso, Texas
| | - Victoria Lyo
- Department of Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California
| | - Omar Ghanem
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Nancy Puzziferri
- Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Dimitrios Stefanidis
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Beran A, Shaear M, Al-Mudares S, Sharma I, Matar R, Al-Haddad M, Salame M, Portela R, Clapp B, Dayyeh BKA, Ghanem OM. Predictors of marginal ulcer after gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2023:10.1007/s11605-023-05619-7. [PMID: 36795250 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05619-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Marginal ulcer (MU) is a common complication following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) with an incidence rate of up to 25%. Several studies have evaluated different risk factors associated with MU with inconsistent findings. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to identify the predictors of MU after RYGB. METHODS A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases was conducted through April 2022. All studies that used a multivariate model to assess risk factors for MU after RYGB were included. Pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for risk factors reported in ≥ 3 studies were obtained within a random-effects model. RESULTS Fourteen studies with 344,829 patients who underwent RYGB were included. Eleven different risk factors were analyzed. Meta-analysis demonstrated that Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection (OR 4.97 [2.24-10.99]), smoking (OR 2.50 [1.76-3.54]), and diabetes mellitus (OR 1.80 [1.15-2.80]), were significant predictors of MU. Increased age, body mass index, female gender, obstructive sleep apnea, hypertension, and alcohol use were not predictors of MU. There was a trend of an increased risk of MU associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (OR 2.43 [0.72-8.21]) and a lower risk of MU with proton pump inhibitors use (OR 0.44 [0.11-2.11]). CONCLUSIONS Smoking cessation, optimizing glycemic control, and eradication of HP infection reduce the risk of MU following RYGB. Recognition of predictors of MU after RYGB will allow physicians to identify high-risk patients, improve surgical outcomes, and reduce the risk of MU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Azizullah Beran
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Mohammad Shaear
- Department of General Surgery, College of Medicine, Central Michigan University, Saginaw, MI, USA
| | - Saif Al-Mudares
- Department of Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA
| | - Ishna Sharma
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Reem Matar
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Mohammad Al-Haddad
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Marita Salame
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Ray Portela
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Benjamin Clapp
- Department of Surgery, Texas Tech University, El Paso, TX, USA
| | - Barham K Abu Dayyeh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Omar M Ghanem
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Belle S, Kouladouros K, Kähler G. [Management of Endoscopic Complications after Bariatric Surgery: Focus on Current Endoscopic Therapy]. Zentralbl Chir 2022; 147:539-546. [PMID: 36479650 DOI: 10.1055/a-1962-6910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
In bariatric surgery, complications are rare. Most of the complications can be managed by endoscopy. Rare complications impose a challenge in everyday clinical work. To optimally treat the complications and to minimise the harm to the patient it is important to implement complication management. This review gives an overview of relevant bariatric complications and endoscopic therapy strategies, focusing on published literature of the last five years. This manuscript could be a starting point for complication management in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Belle
- Zentrale Interdisziplinäre Endoskopie (ZIE), Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Deutschland
| | - Konstantinos Kouladouros
- Chirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Deutschland
| | - Georg Kähler
- Chirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Martinino A, Bhandari M, Abouelazayem M, Abdellatif A, Koshy RM, Mahawar K. Perforated Marginal Ulcer After Gastric Bypass for Obesity: A Systematic Review. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2022; 18:1168-1175. [DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.05.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2022] [Revised: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/22/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
8
|
Implications of Bariatric Surgery on the Pharmacokinetics of Antiretrovirals in People Living with HIV. Clin Pharmacokinet 2022; 61:619-635. [PMID: 35404470 PMCID: PMC9095546 DOI: 10.1007/s40262-022-01120-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Bariatric surgery is increasingly applied among people living with HIV to reduce obesity and the associated morbidity and mortality. In people living with HIV, sufficient antiretroviral exposure and activity should always be maintained to prevent development of resistance and disease progression. However, bariatric surgery procedures bring various gastrointestinal modifications including changes in gastric volume, and acidity, gastrointestinal emptying time, enterohepatic circulation and delayed entry of bile acids. These alterations may affect many aspects of antiretroviral pharmacokinetics. Some drug characteristics may result in subtherapeutic exposure and the potential related risk of treatment failure and resistance. Antiretrovirals that require low pH, administration of fatty meals, longer intestinal exposure, and an enterohepatic recirculation for their absorption may be most impacted by bariatric surgery procedures. Additionally, some antiretrovirals can interact with the polyvalent cations in supplements or drugs inhibiting gastric acid, thereby preventing their use as these comedications are commonly prescribed post-bariatric surgery. Predicting pharmacokinetics on the basis of drug characteristics solely proved to be challenging, therefore pharmacokinetic studies remain crucial in this population. Here, we discuss general implications of bariatric surgery on antiretroviral outcomes in people living with HIV as well as drug properties that are relevant for the choice of antiretroviral treatment in this special patient population. Additionally, we summarise studies that evaluated the pharmacokinetics of antiretrovirals post-bariatric surgery. Finally, we performed a comprehensive analysis of theoretical considerations and published pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data to provide recommendations on antiretrovirals for people living with HIV undergoing bariatric surgery.
Collapse
|
9
|
Stenberg E, Dos Reis Falcão LF, O'Kane M, Liem R, Pournaras DJ, Salminen P, Urman RD, Wadhwa A, Gustafsson UO, Thorell A. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Bariatric Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations: A 2021 Update. World J Surg 2022; 46:729-751. [PMID: 34984504 PMCID: PMC8885505 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-021-06394-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 139] [Impact Index Per Article: 69.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Background This is the second updated Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society guideline, presenting a consensus for optimal perioperative care in bariatric surgery and providing recommendations for each ERAS item within the ERAS® protocol. Methods A principal literature search was performed utilizing the Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane databases and ClinicalTrials.gov through December 2020, with particular attention paid to meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials and large prospective cohort studies. Selected studies were examined, reviewed and graded according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. After critical appraisal of these studies, the group of authors reached consensus regarding recommendations. Results The quality of evidence for many ERAS interventions remains relatively low in a bariatric setting and evidence-based practices may need to be extrapolated from other surgeries. Conclusion A comprehensive, updated evidence-based consensus was reached and is presented in this review by the ERAS® Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik Stenberg
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
| | | | - Mary O'Kane
- Dietetic Department, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Ronald Liem
- Department of Surgery, Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda, Netherlands.,Dutch Obesity Clinic, The Hague, Netherlands
| | - Dimitri J Pournaras
- Department of Upper GI and Bariatric/Metabolic Surgery, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Southmead Road, Bristol, UK
| | - Paulina Salminen
- Department of Surgery, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.,Division of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Richard D Urman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anupama Wadhwa
- Department of Anesthesiology, Outcomes Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, USA
| | - Ulf O Gustafsson
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anders Thorell
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gastrojejunal Anastomotic Stricture Following Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: an Analysis of Anastomotic Technique at a Single Institution. Obes Surg 2021; 31:4947-4952. [PMID: 34518993 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-021-05678-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Revised: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) are at risk of developing strictures of the gastrojejunal anastomosis (GJA). Several variables can affect this, one of which may be the method of anastomosis. Between 2010 and 2014, our institution utilized three different anastomotic techniques for creating the GJA (25 mm end-to-end circular-stapled (CS), linear-stapled (LS), and robotic hand sewn (HS)). Our objectives were to compare the method of GJA relative to the subsequent development of anastomotic stricture. METHODS We queried our electronic health record for all patients who underwent an upper endoscopy (EGD) after RYGB (2010-2014). Patient charts were retrospectively reviewed for type of GJA, weight loss, complications, interventions, and revisions of the GJA. RESULTS In total, 1112 RYGB were performed at our institute, and 17.4% of patients (194/1112) had an upper endoscopy (EGD). Overall, 3.1% (34/1112) were found to have a stricture of the GJA. Patients undergoing a CS, LS, and HS anastomosis had GJA stricture rates of 4.9%, 0.5%, and 1.2% respectively (CS to LS (p < 0.05), p = NS among CS vs. HS, and LS vs. HS). The rate of GJA revision was 1.5%, 0.5%, and 0.1% (p = NS). In patients who had an EGD, excess BMI loss was 57.4%, 64.6%, and 59.2% (p = NS). In patients symptomatic from strictures, excess BMI loss was 69.4%, 83%, and 63.5% respectively (p = NS). CONCLUSION The anastomotic technique for creating of the GJA may impact the formation of strictures. Based on our experience, gastrojejunostomies created with a 2-mm EEA-stapling technique are at higher risk of strictures.
Collapse
|
11
|
Kingma JS, Burgers DMT, Monpellier VM, Wiezer MJ, Blussé van Oud-Alblas HJ, Vaughns JD, Sherwin CMT, Knibbe CAJ. Oral drug dosing following bariatric surgery: General concepts and specific dosing advice. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2021; 87:4560-4576. [PMID: 33990981 PMCID: PMC9291886 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2020] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Bariatric or weight‐loss surgery is a popular option for weight reduction. Depending on the surgical procedure, gastric changes like decreased transit time and volume and increased pH, decreased absorption surface in the small intestine, decreased exposure to bile acids and enterohepatic circulation, and decreased gastrointestinal transit time may be expected. In the years after bariatric surgery, patients will also substantially lose weight. As a result of these changes, the absorption, distribution, metabolism and/or elimination of drugs may be altered. The purpose of this article is to report the general influence of bariatric surgery on oral drug absorption, and to provide guidance for dosing of commonly used drugs in this special population. Upon oral drug administration, the time to maximum concentration is often earlier and this concentration may be higher with less consistent effects on trough concentrations and exposure. Additionally, prescription of liquid formulations to bariatric patients is supported by some reports, even though the high sugar load of these suspensions may be of concern. Studies on extended‐release medications result in an unaltered exposure for a substantial number of drugs. Also, studies evaluating the influence of timing after surgery show dynamic absorption profiles. Although for this group specific advice can be proposed for many drugs, we conclude that there is insufficient evidence for general advice for oral drug therapy after bariatric surgery, implying that a risk assessment on a case‐by‐case basis is required for each drug.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jurjen S Kingma
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Division of Laboratories, Pharmacy, and Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Desirée M T Burgers
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Valerie M Monpellier
- Nederlandse Obesitas Kliniek (Dutch Obesity Clinic), Huis ter Heide, The Netherlands
| | - Marinus J Wiezer
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | | | - Janelle D Vaughns
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Children's National Health System, Washington, DC, USA.,Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Children's National Health System, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Catherine M T Sherwin
- Department of Pediatrics, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton Children's Hospital, Dayton, Ohio, USA
| | - Catherijne A J Knibbe
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.,Division of Systems Biomedicine & Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sundaresan N, Sullivan M, Hiticas BA, Hui BY, Poliakin L, Thompson KJ, McKillop IH, Barbat S, Kuwada TS, Gersin KS, Nimeri A. Impacts of Gastrojejunal Anastomotic Technique on Rates of Marginal Ulcer Formation and Anastomotic Bleeding Following Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. Obes Surg 2021; 31:2921-2926. [PMID: 33939060 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-021-05292-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2020] [Revised: 02/06/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Marginal ulceration (MU) and bleeding are possible complications following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Our institution utilizes three techniques for performing the gastrojejunal anastomosis (GJA), providing a means to compare postoperative MU and bleeding as it relates to GJA technique. OBJECTIVES We sought to analyze the incidence of MU and bleeding between the 25-mm end-to-end anastomosis (EEA) stapler, linear stapler (LS), and robotic hand-sewn (RHS) GJA techniques. METHODS Electronic health records for all patients who had an upper endoscopy (EGD) after RYGB were queried (2010-2014). Charts were retrospectively reviewed for type of GJA, complications, endoscopic interventions, and smoking and NSAID use. RESULTS Out of 1112 RYGBs, the GJA was created using an EEA, LS, or RHS approach in 58.6%, 33.6%, and 7.7% of patients, respectively. 17.4% had an EGD (19.9% EEA, 13.9% LS, and 14.0% RHS). Incidence of MU was 7.3% (9.3% EEA, 4.8% LS, and 5.8% RHS). Rates of EGD and MU were significantly higher after EEA vs. LS GJA (p<0.05). The bleeding rate was 1.5%, [1.1% EEA, 2.1% LS, and 2.3% RHS (p=NS)]. MU within 90 days of RYGB occurred in 4.1%, 0.8%, and 4.7%, respectively (p<0.05 for EEA vs LS only). NSAID and cigarette use were identified in 29.3%, 38.9%, and 60% and 17.2%, 22.2%, and 20%, respectively, for the EEA, LS, and RHS GJA (p=NS). CONCLUSION The method of GJA has an impact on rate of MU formation. A GJA fashioned with a 25-mm EEA stapler tends to have higher rates of EGD and MU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naresh Sundaresan
- Atrium Health Weight Management, Section of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Atrium Health, 2630 E 7th St Suite 100, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA
| | - Mariel Sullivan
- Division of Research, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, 1025 Morehead Medical Dr #300, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA
| | - B Amy Hiticas
- Carolinas Medical Center-Mercy, Atrium Health, 2001 Vail Ave, Charlotte, NC, 28207, USA
| | - Benedict Y Hui
- Atrium Health Weight Management, Section of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Atrium Health, 2630 E 7th St Suite 100, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA
| | - Lauren Poliakin
- Atrium Health Weight Management, Section of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Atrium Health, 2630 E 7th St Suite 100, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA
| | - Kyle J Thompson
- Division of Research, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, 1025 Morehead Medical Dr #300, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA
| | - Iain H McKillop
- Division of Research, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, 1025 Morehead Medical Dr #300, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA
| | - Selwan Barbat
- Atrium Health Weight Management, Section of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Atrium Health, 2630 E 7th St Suite 100, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA
| | - Timothy S Kuwada
- Atrium Health Weight Management, Section of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Atrium Health, 2630 E 7th St Suite 100, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA
| | - Keith S Gersin
- Atrium Health Weight Management, Section of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Atrium Health, 2630 E 7th St Suite 100, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA
| | - Abdelrahman Nimeri
- Atrium Health Weight Management, Section of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Atrium Health, 2630 E 7th St Suite 100, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Incidence and Prognostic Factors for the Development of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Marginal Ulcers After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Procedures. Obes Surg 2021; 31:3005-3014. [PMID: 33761070 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-021-05363-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Revised: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Marginal ulcer (MU) is a serious complication after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) procedures. This study reports the incidence, risk factors, and treatment outcomes of symptomatic and incidentally, at routine endoscopy diagnosed, MU. METHODS All patients undergoing RYGB procedures between 2013 and 2018 at a single center were included. Upper endoscopy was performed in case of symptoms and/or routinely 2 and 5 years postoperatively. RESULTS In total, 568 patients (83.3% female) underwent RYGB procedure with a median age of 40 years and median initial body mass index of 41 kg/m2. The median time to follow-up was 2.99 years. Routine 2- and 5-year upper endoscopy was performed in 256 (55.3%) and 65 (38.0%) eligible patients, respectively. In 86 (15.1%) patients, MU was diagnosed at a median time of 14.2 months (4.58-26.2) postoperatively and 24.4% of patients with MU were asymptomatic. In total, 76.7% of MUs were located on the side of the Roux limb. 88.4% of MUs were treated conservatively; re-operation was necessary in 10 (11.6%) patients. Smoking and type 2 diabetes mellitus were the only independent risk factors for MU development in multivariate analysis with a hazard ratio of 2.65 and 1.18 (HbA1c per unit >6.0), respectively. CONCLUSION MU is a common complication after gastric bypass surgery with 25% of patients being asymptomatic. Follow-up routine endoscopy is recommended for early MU detection and subsequent accurate therapy, especially in patients with the independent risk factors smoking and type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Collapse
|
14
|
Mahawar KK. Incidence of Marginal Ulcers After Gastric Bypass Seems to Be Inversely Related to the Duration of Prophylaxis with Proton Pump Inhibitors. Obes Surg 2020; 31:1357-1358. [PMID: 33068262 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-020-05050-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2020] [Revised: 09/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kamal K Mahawar
- Bariatric Unit, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, SR4 7TP, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bekhali Z, Sundbom M. Low Risk for Marginal Ulcers in Duodenal Switch and Gastric Bypass in a Well-Defined Cohort of 472 Patients. Obes Surg 2020; 30:4422-4427. [PMID: 32638248 PMCID: PMC7524689 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-020-04822-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Revised: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Marginal ulcer (MU) is well-known complication in bariatric surgery. Several studies are available in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP), while data on the incidence in duodenal switch (DS) is limited. We aimed to compare the incidence of MU between DS and RYGBP in a well-defined cohort and to identify associative factors. METHODS A cohort of 732 patients with BMI ≥ 48 who had undergone primary DS or RYGBP during 2008-2018 received a questionnaire concerning ulcers, PPI therapy, and smoking habits; hereafter, patient charts were reviewed. Incidence rates (IRs) for MU were calculated in our survey and on previous registered data in the national quality register for bariatric surgery (SOReg). A multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify predictive risk factors for MU. RESULTS After a mean follow-up of 6.1 years, 472 (64%) patients responded (47 ± 11 years old, 65% women and 42% DS). Of 41 MUs identified, 23 were endoscopically verified. Gastrointestinal bleeding, abdominal pain, and dysphagia were the most common symptoms. IR for MU was 1.4% (DS 1.3% and RYGBP 1.5%) per patient-year, compared with 0.9% according to SOReg-data. Persisting PPI treatment was seen in about three quarter of former MU patients (OR 11.2 [3.6-34.7], p < 0.001), but no other associative factors were found. CONCLUSION The overall risk for MU was low, about 1% per patient-year, without difference between DS and RYGBP. Ongoing PPI treatment was frequent in many former MU patients. This study on MU after DS provides reassuring results for future bariatric surgery candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zakaria Bekhali
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, SE-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden. .,Department of Surgery, Gävle Hospital, Kirurgmottagningen, Gävle sjukhus, SE-801 88, Gävle, Sweden.
| | - Magnus Sundbom
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, SE-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Di Palma A, Liu B, Maeda A, Anvari M, Jackson T, Okrainec A. Marginal ulceration following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: risk factors for ulcer development, recurrence and need for revisional surgery. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:2347-2353. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07650-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
|
17
|
Wennerlund J, Gunnarsson U, Strigård K, Sundbom M. Acid-related complications after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: risk factors and impact of proton pump inhibitors. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2020; 16:620-625. [DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2019] [Revised: 11/17/2019] [Accepted: 01/04/2020] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
18
|
Mechanick JI, Apovian C, Brethauer S, Timothy Garvey W, Joffe AM, Kim J, Kushner RF, Lindquist R, Pessah-Pollack R, Seger J, Urman RD, Adams S, Cleek JB, Correa R, Figaro MK, Flanders K, Grams J, Hurley DL, Kothari S, Seger MV, Still CD. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Perioperative Nutrition, Metabolic, and Nonsurgical Support of Patients Undergoing Bariatric Procedures - 2019 Update: Cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology, The Obesity Society, American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, Obesity Medicine Association, and American Society of Anesthesiologists. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2020; 28:O1-O58. [PMID: 32202076 DOI: 10.1002/oby.22719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 145] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2019] [Accepted: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The development of these updated clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) was commissioned by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE), The Obesity Society (TOS), American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS), Obesity Medicine Association (OMA), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Boards of Directors in adherence with the AACE 2017 protocol for standardized production of CPGs, algorithms, and checklists. METHODS Each recommendation was evaluated and updated based on new evidence from 2013 to the present and subjective factors provided by experts. RESULTS New or updated topics in this CPG include: contextualization in an adiposity-based chronic disease complications-centric model, nuance-based and algorithm/checklist-assisted clinical decision-making about procedure selection, novel bariatric procedures, enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery protocols, and logistical concerns (including cost factors) in the current health care arena. There are 85 numbered recommendations that have updated supporting evidence, of which 61 are revised and 12 are new. Noting that there can be multiple recommendation statements within a single numbered recommendation, there are 31 (13%) Grade A, 42 (17%) Grade B, 72 (29%) Grade C, and 101 (41%) Grade D recommendations. There are 858 citations, of which 81 (9.4%) are evidence level (EL) 1 (highest), 562 (65.5%) are EL 2, 72 (8.4%) are EL 3, and 143 (16.7%) are EL 4 (lowest). CONCLUSIONS Bariatric procedures remain a safe and effective intervention for higher-risk patients with obesity. Clinical decision-making should be evidence based within the context of a chronic disease. A team approach to perioperative care is mandatory, with special attention to nutritional and metabolic issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey I Mechanick
- Guideline Task Force Chair (AACE); Professor of Medicine, Medical Director, Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Clinical Cardiovascular Health at Mount Sinai Heart; Director, Metabolic Support Divisions of Cardiology and Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Bone Disease, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Past President, AACE and ACE
| | - Caroline Apovian
- Guideline Task Force Co-Chair (TOS); Professor of Medicine and Director, Nutrition and Weight Management, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stacy Brethauer
- Guideline Task Force Co-Chair (ASMBS); Professor of Surgery, Vice Chair of Surgery, Quality and Patient Safety; Medical Director, Supply Chain Management, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - W Timothy Garvey
- Guideline Task Force Co-Chair (AACE); Butterworth Professor, Department of Nutrition Sciences, GRECC Investigator and Staff Physician, Birmingham VAMC; Director, UAB Diabetes Research Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Aaron M Joffe
- Guideline Task Force Co-Chair (ASA); Professor of Anesthesiology, Service Chief, Otolaryngology, Oral, Maxillofacial, and Urologic Surgeries, Associate Medical Director, Respiratory Care, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Julie Kim
- Guideline Task Force Co-Chair (ASMBS); Harvard Medical School, Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Robert F Kushner
- Guideline Task Force Co-Chair (TOS); Professor of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Richard Lindquist
- Guideline Task Force Co-Chair (OMA); Director, Medical Weight Management, Swedish Medical Center; Director, Medical Weight Management, Providence Health Services; Obesity Medicine Consultant, Seattle, Washington
| | - Rachel Pessah-Pollack
- Guideline Task Force Co-Chair (AACE); Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - Jennifer Seger
- Guideline Task Force Co-Chair (OMA); Adjunct Assistant Professor, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Long School of Medicine, UT Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Richard D Urman
- Guideline Task Force Co-Chair (ASA); Associate Professor of Anesthesia, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stephanie Adams
- Writer (AACE); AACE Director of Clinical Practice Guidelines Development, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - John B Cleek
- Writer (TOS); Associate Professor, Department of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Riccardo Correa
- Technical Analysis (AACE); Assistant Professor of Medicine and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Fellowship Director, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - M Kathleen Figaro
- Technical Analysis (AACE); Board-certified Endocrinologist, Heartland Endocrine Group, Davenport, Iowa
| | - Karen Flanders
- Writer (ASMBS); Massachusetts General Hospital Weight Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jayleen Grams
- Writer (AACE); Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham; Staff Surgeon, Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Daniel L Hurley
- Writer (AACE); Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Shanu Kothari
- Writer (ASMBS); Fellowship Director of MIS/Bariatric Surgery, Gundersen Health System, La Crosse, Wisconsin
| | - Michael V Seger
- Writer (OMA); Bariatric Medical Institute of Texas, San Antonio, Texas, Clinical Assistant Professor, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Christopher D Still
- Writer (TOS); Medical Director, Center for Nutrition and Weight Management Director, Geisinger Obesity Institute; Medical Director, Employee Wellness, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Mechanick JI, Apovian C, Brethauer S, Garvey WT, Joffe AM, Kim J, Kushner RF, Lindquist R, Pessah-Pollack R, Seger J, Urman RD, Adams S, Cleek JB, Correa R, Figaro MK, Flanders K, Grams J, Hurley DL, Kothari S, Seger MV, Still CD. Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutrition, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of patients undergoing bariatric procedures - 2019 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology, The Obesity Society, American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery, Obesity Medicine Association, and American Society of Anesthesiologists. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2019; 16:175-247. [PMID: 31917200 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.10.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 240] [Impact Index Per Article: 48.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The development of these updated clinical practice guidelines (CPG) was commissioned by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, the American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, the Obesity Medicine Association, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists boards of directors in adherence to the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists 2017 protocol for standardized production of CPG, algorithms, and checklists. METHODS Each recommendation was evaluated and updated based on new evidence from 2013 to the present and subjective factors provided by experts. RESULTS New or updated topics in this CPG include contextualization in an adiposity-based, chronic disease complications-centric model, nuance-based, and algorithm/checklist-assisted clinical decision-making about procedure selection, novel bariatric procedures, enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery protocols, and logistical concerns (including cost factors) in the current healthcare arena. There are 85 numbered recommendations that have updated supporting evidence, of which 61 are revised and 12 are new. Noting that there can be multiple recommendation statements within a single numbered recommendation, there are 31 (13%) Grade A, 42 (17%) Grade B, 72 (29%) Grade C, and 101 (41%) Grade D recommendations. There are 858 citations, of which 81 (9.4%) are evidence level (EL) 1 (highest), 562 (65.5%) are EL 2, 72 (8.4%) are EL 3, and 143 (16.7%) are EL 4 (lowest). CONCLUSIONS Bariatric procedures remain a safe and effective intervention for higher-risk patients with obesity. Clinical decision-making should be evidence-based within the context of a chronic disease. A team approach to perioperative care is mandatory with special attention to nutritional and metabolic issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey I Mechanick
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Clinical Cardiovascular Health at Mount Sinai Heart, New York, New York; Metabolic Support Divisions of Cardiology and Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Bone Disease, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
| | - Caroline Apovian
- Nutrition and Weight Management, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - W Timothy Garvey
- Department of Nutrition Sciences, Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama; UAB Diabetes Research Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Aaron M Joffe
- University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Julie Kim
- Harvard Medical School, Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Robert F Kushner
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Rachel Pessah-Pollack
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - Jennifer Seger
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Long School of Medicine, UT Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas
| | | | - Stephanie Adams
- American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - John B Cleek
- Department of Nutrition Sciences, Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama
| | | | | | - Karen Flanders
- Massachusetts General Hospital Weight Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jayleen Grams
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Daniel L Hurley
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Michael V Seger
- Bariatric Medical Institute of Texas, San Antonio, Texas, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Christopher D Still
- Center for Nutrition and Weight Management Director, Geisinger Obesity Institute, Danville, Pennsylvania; Employee Wellness, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Spaniolas K, Yang J, Crowley S, Yin D, Docimo S, Bates AT, Pryor AD. Association of Long-term Anastomotic Ulceration After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass With Tobacco Smoking. JAMA Surg 2019; 153:862-864. [PMID: 29926103 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantinos Spaniolas
- Division of Bariatric, Foregut, and Advanced Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York
| | - Jie Yang
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York
| | - Shelby Crowley
- Division of Bariatric, Foregut, and Advanced Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York
| | - Donglei Yin
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York
| | - Salvatore Docimo
- Division of Bariatric, Foregut, and Advanced Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York
| | - Andrew T Bates
- Division of Bariatric, Foregut, and Advanced Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York
| | - Aurora D Pryor
- Division of Bariatric, Foregut, and Advanced Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Backman O, Freedman J, Marsk R, Nilsson H. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Without Division of the Mesentery Reduces the Risk of Postoperative Complications. Surg Endosc 2018; 33:2858-2863. [PMID: 30460504 PMCID: PMC6684563 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6581-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2017] [Accepted: 11/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anastomotic complications after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) including leaks, ulceration, and stenosis remain a significant cause of post-operative morbidity and mortality. Our objective was to compare two different surgical techniques regarding short-term anastomotic complications. METHODS A retrospective analysis of all patients operated with a primary LRYGB from 2006 to June 2015 in one institution, where prospectively collected data from an internal quality registry and medical journals were analyzed. RESULTS In total, 2420 patients were included in the analysis. 1016 were operated with a technique where the mesentery was divided during the creation of the Roux-limb (DM-LRYGB) and 1404 were operated with a method where the mesentery was left intact (IM-LRYGB). Leakage in the first 30 days [2.6% vs. 1.1% (p < 0.05)], and ulceration or stenosis occurring during the first 6 months after surgery [5.6% vs. 0.1% (p < 0.05)] was significantly higher in the DM-LRYGB group. Adjusted odds ratio for anastomotic leak was 0.46 (95% CI 0.24-0.87) and for stenosis/ulceration 0.01 (95% CI 0.002-0.09). CONCLUSION IM-LRYGB seems to reduce the risk of complications at the anastomosis. A plausible explanation for this is that the blood supply to the anastomosis is compromised when the mesentery is divided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olof Backman
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Science (Hand and Plastic Surgery), Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. .,Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Jacob Freedman
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Richard Marsk
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Henrik Nilsson
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Gagner M. Strategies to decrease readmission after gastric bypass, in the long-term. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2017; 13:969-971. [PMID: 28366672 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2017] [Revised: 01/06/2017] [Accepted: 01/07/2017] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michel Gagner
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida; Hopital du Sacre Coeur, Montreal, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Do sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass influence treatment with proton pump inhibitors 4 years after surgery? A nationwide cohort. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2016; 13:951-959. [PMID: 28223087 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2016] [Revised: 12/05/2016] [Accepted: 12/14/2016] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common obesity-related co-morbidity that routinely is treated by continuous proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. A number of concerns have been raised regarding the risk of de novo GERD or exacerbation of preexisting GERD after sleeve gastrectomy (SG). OBJECTIVE To assess PPI use at 4 years after bariatric surgery. SETTING French National Health Insurance. METHODS Data were extracted from the French National Health Insurance database. All adult obese patients who had undergone gastric bypass (GBP) (n = 8250) or SG (n = 11,923) in 2011 in France were included. Patients were considered to be on continuous PPI therapy when PPIs were dispensed≥6 times per year. Logistic regression models were used to compute odds ratios for potential risk factors for PPI reimbursement 4 years after surgery. RESULTS Overall, continuous use of PPIs increased from baseline to 4 years after SG and GBP, from 10.9% to 26.5% (P<.001) and from 11.4% to 21.9% (P<.001), respectively. Among patients who underwent PPI therapy before surgery, those who had undergone SG were more likely to continue PPI therapy 4 years after surgery compared with those who underwent GBP (72.7% versus 59.2%; P<.001). In multivariate analyses, the major risk factors for persistent continuous PPI treatment 4 years after surgery were the following: SG (odds ratio [OR] = 1.87; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.55-2.25), higher body mass index (OR 1.85; 95% CI 1.35-2.5), and preoperative antidepressant treatment (OR 1.89; 95% CI 1.56-2.29). CONCLUSION At a nationwide scale, continuous PPI treatment is used by 1 of 10 obese patients before bariatric surgery, but by 1 of 4 patients 4 years after surgery. SG compared with GBP, higher body mass index, and other coexisting conditions are the 3 major risk factors for medium-term continuous PPI therapy.
Collapse
|
24
|
|
25
|
Aird LNF, Hong D, Gmora S, Breau R, Anvari M. The impact of a standardized program on short and long-term outcomes in bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc 2016; 31:801-808. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5035-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2016] [Accepted: 06/11/2016] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
|