The effect of bariatric surgery on the direct oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban: the extension study

Medication and supplement pharmacokinetic changes following bariatric surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of bariatric surgery on the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of orally administered medications and supplements.

METHODS

Systematic searches of bibliographic databases were conducted to identify studies. Pooled effect estimates from different surgical procedures were calculated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Quantitative data were synthesized from 58 studies including a total of 1985 participants. Whilst 40 medications and 6 supplements were evaluated across these studies, heterogeneity and missing information reduced the scope of the meta-analysis to the following medications and supplements: atorvastatin, paracetamol, omeprazole, midazolam, vitamin D, calcium, zinc, and iron supplements. There were no significant differences in PK parameters post-surgery for the drugs atorvastatin and omeprazole, and supplements calcium, ferritin, and zinc supplements. Paracetamol showed reduced clearance (mean difference [MD] = -15.56 L/hr, p = 0.0002, I2 = 67%), increased maximal concentration (MD = 6.90 μg/ml, p = 0.006, I2 = 92%) and increased terminal elimination half-life (MD = 0.49 hr, p < 0.0001, I2 = 3%) post-surgery. The remaining 36 medications and 2 supplements were included in a systematic review. Overall, 18 of the 53 drugs and supplements showed post-operative changes in PK parameters.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates heterogeneity in practice and could not reach conclusive findings for most PK parameters. Prospective studies are needed to inform best practice and enhance patient healthcare and safety following bariatric surgery.

Managing venous thrombosis in a pediatric patient with short bowel and congenital nephrotic syndromes: a case report emphasizing rivaroxaban level monitoring

Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) typically exhibit a predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic response at a fixed dose, not necessitating monitoring under standard conditions. Yet, in specific clinical scenarios that can impair it, like Congenital Nephrotic Syndrome (CNS) or Short Bowel Syndrome (SBS) due to absorption issues, anti-thrombin III (AT-III) deficiency and non-selective proteinuria, adjusting the dosage to achieve appropriate plasma concentrations could prove beneficial. We report a 3-month-old female with catheter-related jugular thrombosis affected by CNS concomitant to SBS and failure of both treatments with heparin and warfarin, that was switched to dose-adjusted pediatric rivaroxaban. Rivaroxaban was adjusted to reach peak levels between 189 and 419 ng/ml and the lower trough levels between 6 and 87 ng/ml. Increasing doses were needed due to SBS related malabsorption but a complete permeabilization of the vein was achieved without bleeding complications. The use of anti-Xa adjusted rivaroxaban could be an alternative to improve anticoagulation and secondary thromboprophylaxis in pediatric patients SBS and an option to children with CNS.

The Effects of Bariatric Surgery on Pharmacokinetics of Drugs: a Review of Current Evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Obesity constitutes a major public health concern and has been recognized as an epidemic. To date, bariatric surgery remains the most effective way for substantial long-lasting weight loss in severe obesity. The purpose of this review is to summarize how the pharmacokinetics of drugs are affected by the most common types of bariatric surgery, i.e., Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG).

RECENT FINDINGS

Limited data are available regarding the changes in pharmacokinetics of drugs after bariatric surgery. The lack of existing guidelines may lead patients to experience drug toxicity or therapeutic undertreatment. Pharmacokinetic parameters that need to be taken into consideration postoperatively include gastric motility, gastric volume, pH, surface area, bile secretions, carrier proteins, and first-pass metabolism. For drugs with a narrow therapeutic index, other factors need to be monitored closely, including plasma drug levels, patients' clinical outcomes, and laboratory markers. Patients should be followed up frequently and treated in accordance with their response to the drug therapy. Bariatric surgery may affect the pharmacokinetics of various drugs, due to the resultant anatomical changes and the substantial weight loss. Therefore, there is a need to identify those potential changes and adjust patients' medication doses in order to achieve higher efficacy and avoid toxicity.

Plasma concentrations of SSRI/SNRI after bariatric surgery and the effects on depressive symptoms

Background

Depression and treatment with antidepressants SSRI/SNRI are common in people with morbid obesity who are candidates for bariatric surgery. There is few and inconsistent data about the postoperative plasma concentrations of SSRI/SNRI. The aims of our study were to provide comprehensive data about the postoperative bioavailability of SSRI/SNRI, and the clinical effects on depressive symptoms.

Methods

Prospective multicenter study including 63 patients with morbid obesity and therapy with fixed doses of SSRI/SNRI: participants filled the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) questionnaire, and plasma levels of SSRI/SNRI were measured by HPLC, preoperatively (T0), and 4 weeks (T1) and 6 months (T2) postoperatively.

Results

The plasma concentrations of SSRI/SNRI dropped significantly in the bariatric surgery group from T0 to T2 by 24.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], -36.8 to -16.6, p = 0.0027): from T0 to T1 by 10.5% (95% 17 CI, -22.7 to -2.3; p = 0.016), and from T1 to T2 by 12.8% (95% CI, -29.3 to 3.5, p = 0.123), respectively.There was no significant change in the BDI score during follow-up (-2.9, 95% CI, -7.4 to 1.0; p = 0.13).The clinical outcome with respect to SSRI/SNRI plasma concentrations, weight change, and change of BDI score were similar in the subgroups undergoing gastric bypass surgery and sleeve gastrectomy, respectively. In the conservative group the plasma concentrations of SSRI/SNRI remained unchanged throughout the 6 months follow-up (-14.7, 95% CI, -32.6 to 1.7; p = 0.076).

Conclusion

In patients undergoing bariatric surgery plasma concentrations of SSRI/SNRI decrease significantly by about 25% mainly during the first 4 weeks postoperatively with wide individual variation, but without correlation to the severity of depression or weight loss.

Dilemmas Related to Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulant Administration in Patients With Extreme Obesity

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to discuss the controversies surrounding the use and dosing of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in obese patients recognizing the limitations of the existing evidence base that preclude strong recommendations.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search of MEDLINE was performed (2020 to end August 2022) subsequent to recent guidelines using the following search terms: direct acting anticoagulants, obesity, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, dabigatran, dabigatran etexilate, and clinical practice guidelines.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA ABSTRACTION

English-language studies and those conducted in adults were selected.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The available randomized studies evaluating DOACs had relatively small numbers of patients with more extreme forms of obesity (body mass index [BMI] > 40 kg/m²) and none of the larger studies had a specific focus on dosing DOACs in obese patients. Recent guidelines by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) have specific recommendations for dosing DOACs in obesity. There are pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and observational studies published before and after the ISTH guidelines with a focus on DOAC dosing in obese patients that generally support the recommendations in the guidelines, but most involved small numbers of patients usually with BMIs <45 kg/m².

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

This review discusses DOAC dosing in obesity with important considerations for clinicians related to DOAC choice and dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

Dosing alterations of DOACs do not appear to be necessary when used for either prophylaxis or treatment in patients with BMIs up to approximately 45 to 50 kg/m², but research is needed for BMIs >50 kg/m².

Direct oral anticoagulants after bariatric surgery-What is the evidence?

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a global epidemic and bariatric surgery is used with increasing frequency to treat its complications. The extent to which bariatric surgery alters the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is unknown.

AIMS

In this review, we summarize the evidence supporting the use of DOACs after bariatric surgery and apply our findings to resolve several clinical cases.

MATERIALS & METHODS

We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL and ClinicalTrials.gov from January 1, 2000, to June 15, 2021 for randomized and non-randomized studies evaluating the use of DOACs for any indication after bariatric surgery. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full-text articles. Clinical and pharmacokinetic outcomes were pooled by random-effects meta-analysis with inverse variance weighting. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa scale to assess risk of bias in non-randomized studies and assessed the certainty of evidence with GRADE.

RESULTS

From 2519 records, we included 28 studies (n = 3229 patients): no randomized trials, 7 cohort studies, 6 case series, and 15 case reports. Incidence rates for arterial thromboembolism, venous thromboembolism and major bleeding were: 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01-5.10), 2.45 (95% CI: 0.40-7.94), and 3.40 (95% CI: 0.80-9.36) events per 100 patient-years, respectively. The pooled proportion of peak direct oral anticoagulant drug levels within the expected range was 58% (95% CI: 39%-74%).

CONCLUSION

There appears be substantial risk of DOAC malabsorption after bariatric surgery that could affect clinical outcomes, however the certainty of evidence was very low.

PROSPERO

CRD42020202636.

Absorption of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Cancer Patients after Gastrectomy

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are safe and effective in cancer patients treated for venous thromboembolism (VTE) or atrial fibrillation (AF). Gastrectomy is the treatment of choice in patients with localized upper gastrointestinal cancer. DOACs are absorbed in the upper gastrointestinal tract, but to what extent is unclear. In a retrospective analysis, hospital data were searched for adult patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastroesophageal or pancreatic cancer, and DOAC therapy for VTE or AF after gastrectomy. DOAC blood levels were determined by chromogenic assays before and after administration, and thromboembolic and bleeding complications were recorded. Eleven patients (median age 76 years) received a factor Xa inhibitor (FXaI; apixaban (3), edoxaban (3), rivaroxaban (4)) or the factor IIa inhibitor dabigatran (1) for VTE (7) or AF (4) after gastrectomy. Eight patients on FXaI had anti-Xa (aXa) trough levels within the expected range (ER). In all of them, aXa levels increased upon DOAC administration. Two patients on 30 mg edoxaban had low aXa trough levels. Administration of 20 mg of rivaroxaban resulted in trough levels in the ER in one of them. None of the FXaI patients had thromboembolism, while two experienced bleeding (arterial puncture site, gastrointestinal). One dabigatran AF patient with trough and peak concentrations below the ER had strokes during 110 mg and 150 mg dabigatran administration. While on apixaban, aXa levels were in the ER, and no clinical complications occurred. DOACs, particularly FXaI, were adequately absorbed in cancer patients after gastrectomy. Our observation of recurrent thromboembolic events in a patient treated with dabigatran warrants cautious use in this specific patient population.

The Effects of Bariatric Surgery and Gastrectomy on the Absorption of Drugs, Vitamins, and Mineral Elements

Bariatric surgery, which is an effective treatment for obesity, and gastrectomy, which is the primary treatment method for gastric cancer, alter the anatomy and physiology of the digestive system. Weight loss and changes in the gastrointestinal tract may affect the pharmacokinetic parameters of oral medications. Both bariatric and cancer patients use drugs chronically or temporarily. It is important to know how surgery affects their pharmacokinetics to ensure an effective and safe therapy. The Cochrane, PubMed, and Scopus databases were searched independently by two authors. The search strategy included controlled vocabulary and keywords. Studies show that bariatric surgery and gastrectomy most often reduce the time to maximum plasma concentration (t_max) and decrease the maximum plasma concentration (C_max) in comparison with the values of these parameters measured in healthy volunteers. Vitamin and mineral deficiencies are also observed. The effect depends on the type of surgery and the properties of the drug. It is recommended to use the drugs that have been tested on these groups of patients as it is possible to monitor them.

Direct Acting Oral Anticoagulants Following Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery

ABSTRACT

Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vary in bioavailability and sites of absorption in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). Data on DOAC use after major GIT surgery are limited. The aim of this case series was to report the impact of surgical resection or bypass of the GIT on rivaroxaban and apixaban peak plasma concentrations. This was a case series of patients who received rivaroxaban or apixaban after GIT surgery, during the period of July 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020. Peak plasma concentrations of rivaroxaban and apixaban were assessed for the expected concentrations. Of the 27 assessed patients, 18 (66.7%) received rivaroxaban, and 9 (33.3%) received apixaban. After rivaroxaban therapy, 4 of 5 patients (80%) who underwent gastrectomy, and 3 of 3 patients (100%) who underwent duodenum and proximal jejunum exclusion had peak plasma concentrations of rivaroxaban lower than the effective range, whereas 11 of 11 patients (100%) who underwent distal bowel or ileostomy had peak rivaroxaban plasma within the effective range. After apixaban therapy, 5 of 6 patients (83.3%) who underwent total or partial gastrectomy achieved effective peak concentrations. All the patients who underwent proximal and distal bowel resection or bypass had peak concentrations of apixaban within the effective range. In conclusion, surgical resection or bypass of the upper GIT could affect DOAC absorption and subsequently peak plasma concentrations. This effect was more observed among rivaroxaban recipients. An injectable anticoagulant or vitamin K antagonist may be preferred if DOAC concentrations cannot be measured after GIT surgery.

Oral Anticoagulant Use in Morbid Obesity and Post Bariatric Surgery: A Review

Bariatric surgery has emerged as a therapy for obesity and the associated comorbidities. Obesity has been shown to be a risk factor for atrial fibrillation as well as venous thromboembolism, both of which are conditions that warrant anticoagulation. There is significant underrepresentation of the morbidly obese population in prospective trials that evaluated direct oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. We aim to review all the available data that assessed these oral anticoagulants in the morbidly obese population (body mass index >40 kg/m² and weight >120 kg) and in the post-bariatric surgery population. Our findings suggest that direct oral anticoagulants may be safe and effective for anticoagulation in morbidly obese patients for both atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. However, warfarin is the preferred agent in the post-bariatric surgery population, given the limited number of studies on direct oral anticoagulants in this population. Further adequately powered randomized control trials are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of these oral anticoagulants in the morbidly obese and post-bariatric surgery population.

Anti-Xa Levels in Morbidly Obese Patients Using Apixaban or Rivaroxaban, Before and After Bariatric Surgery

BACKGROUND

Despite limited evidence about the efficacy and safety of anticoagulation in patients post bariatric surgery, both vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are commonly prescribed.

AIM

To evaluate plasma anti-Xa levels of DOACs in morbidly obese (MO) patients before and after a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) procedure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective, cross-sectional, and longitudinal study of anti-Xa activity of apixaban or rivaroxaban in MO patients (N = 41).

RESULTS

Preoperative analysis of plasma anti-Xa levels were within the normal range in patients using apixaban (n = 29; body mass index [BMI] 44.5 ± 5.1 kg/m²) as well as those using rivaroxaban (n = 12; BMI 42.6 ± 5.9 kg/m²). Postoperative anti-Xa levels of apixaban were all within the therapeutic range, whereas anti-Xa levels of rivaroxaban were subtherapeutic in nine out of 14 (64%) patients. Perioperative longitudinal follow-up in patients using apixaban (n = 18) showed no significant change in anti-Xa levels after RYGB.

CONCLUSION

Plasma anti-Xa levels of apixaban in MO patients remained within the therapeutic range up to a body weight of 144 kg. In patients using rivaroxaban, no statistically significant relation between anti-Xa levels and bodyweight was found. After RYGB, plasma anti-Xa levels of apixaban were unaffected, whereas plasma anti-Xa levels of rivaroxaban tended to become subtherapeutic.

Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on drug pharmacokinetics

INTRODUCTION

Given its feasibility and efficacy, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become a widely accepted bariatric surgery for patients with clinically diagnosed severe obesity. LSG induces anatomical changes and subsequent weight loss which may affect drug pharmacokinetics (PK) and consequently impact dosing regimens. This review aims to examine the effect of LSG on drug PK and identify relevant gastrointestinal physiological alterations.

AREAS COVERED

PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched for articles related to drug PK and LSG from inception to July 2021. Moreover, literature concerning postoperative physiological conditions in the gastrointestinal tract, such as gastric pH, gastric emptying, and small bowel transit time, etc., which may affect the PK profile of drug products was also reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

Although LSG is classified as having restrictive property without malabsorptive bypass, postoperative changes in gastrointestinal physiology and subsequent weight loss may also lead to increased, decreased or unaltered drug exposure levels. General monitoring on drug efficacy or safety using biomarkers is proposed. In addition, therapeutic drug monitoring for those drugs when it is applicable and available is recommended to ensure efficient drug dosing and avoid adverse effects. Further research into many individual drugs are warranted.

Thromboembolism, Bleeding, and Mortality Incidence of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin Postbariatric Surgery

BACKGROUND

There is no randomized controlled trial comparing direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin following bariatric surgery to date. The mortality, thromboembolism, and bleeding risk of DOACs in comparison with warfarin following bariatric surgery remains unclear. We aimed to provide a clinical comparison between DOACs and warfarin for these 3 prespecified outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed on November 10, 2019, using PubMed, Embase, clinicaltrial.gov, and Cochrane databases. Studies with adult patients who were on either warfarin or DOACs following bariatric surgery and reported the incidence of thromboembolism, bleeding, or mortality were included. Pooled incidence for these prespecified outcomes and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for each drug separately using the random-effects model, along with a nonadjusted P value comparing the 2 subgroups.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies (805 patients) were included. Comparing DOACs to warfarin, the following pooled incidences were observed for mortality (DOACs: 3.0%; 95% CI 0.4%-18.6% versus warfarin: 1.5%; 95% CI 0.8%-2.9%; P value comparing the 2 subgroups = .38), thromboembolism (DOACs: 4.9%; 95% CI 1%-21.1% versus warfarin: 1.5%; 95% CI 0.8%-2.9%; P value = .18), and bleeding (DOACs: 3.9%; 95% CI 0.7%-18.2% versus warfarin: 11.3%; 95% CI 5.7%-21.4%; P value = .23).

CONCLUSION

The results of our meta-analysis remain hypothesis-generating, providing rationale for future randomized controlled trial design or well-designed comparative observational studies. Currently, it does not support the change in the current recommendation from warfarin to DOACs following bariatric surgery.

Adverse events in patients taking apixaban or rivaroxaban who have undergone bariatric surgery: a retrospective case series

Clinical trials comparing direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) to warfarin excluded patients with a history of bariatric surgery. The anatomic changes from bariatric procedures have several effects on drug absorption which can have serious consequences for these patients. We sought to describe real-world use of DOACs among adults that had a history of bariatric surgery or underwent a bariatric surgery while receiving a DOAC. We conducted a retrospective case series of adult patients, at a large academic medical center, who initiated any DOAC in 2016 thru 2019 and had a history of bariatric surgery or underwent a bariatric surgery while receiving a DOAC. Thrombotic and bleeding events were described using summary statistics and bleeding severity was described using the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria. Twenty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria of having bariatric surgery (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy or gastric band) and receiving a DOAC. Twenty (71.4%) were prescribed apixaban and eight (28.6%) were prescribed rivaroxaban. Seven patients (25%) experienced at least one clinically relevant non-major bleeding event, including one patient (3.6%) that had a major bleeding event. Two patients (7.1%) had a thromboembolic event. Coagulation laboratory studies were infrequently performed at the time of the bleeding or clotting events. Among patients with a history of bariatric surgery, use of DOACs were commonly associated with clinically relevant non-major bleeding events and less commonly associated with major bleeding and thromboembolic events. Larger studies may offer further insight into the overall safety and efficacy of DOAC therapy in patients that have undergone bariatric surgery. The specific role of coagulation laboratory studies warrants further evaluation.

Use of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with obesity for treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism: Updated communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Control of Anticoagulation

Although direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have widespread first-line use for treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE), uncertainty remains regarding their efficacy and safety in patients with obesity. We reviewed available data for use of DOACs for VTE treatment and prevention in patients with obesity, including phase 3, phase 4, meta-analyses, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics studies. In addition, we reviewed available data regarding DOACs in bariatric surgery. We provide updated guidance recommendations on using DOACs in patients with obesity for treatment and prevention of VTE, as well as following bariatric surgery.

Oral drug dosing following bariatric surgery: General concepts and specific dosing advice

Bariatric or weight‐loss surgery is a popular option for weight reduction. Depending on the surgical procedure, gastric changes like decreased transit time and volume and increased pH, decreased absorption surface in the small intestine, decreased exposure to bile acids and enterohepatic circulation, and decreased gastrointestinal transit time may be expected. In the years after bariatric surgery, patients will also substantially lose weight. As a result of these changes, the absorption, distribution, metabolism and/or elimination of drugs may be altered. The purpose of this article is to report the general influence of bariatric surgery on oral drug absorption, and to provide guidance for dosing of commonly used drugs in this special population. Upon oral drug administration, the time to maximum concentration is often earlier and this concentration may be higher with less consistent effects on trough concentrations and exposure. Additionally, prescription of liquid formulations to bariatric patients is supported by some reports, even though the high sugar load of these suspensions may be of concern. Studies on extended‐release medications result in an unaltered exposure for a substantial number of drugs. Also, studies evaluating the influence of timing after surgery show dynamic absorption profiles. Although for this group specific advice can be proposed for many drugs, we conclude that there is insufficient evidence for general advice for oral drug therapy after bariatric surgery, implying that a risk assessment on a case‐by‐case basis is required for each drug.

The Pharmacology, Efficacy, and Safety of Rivaroxaban in Obese Patient Populations

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death in the USA. Several risk factors have been identified, and obesity has become one of prominent concern. Excessive weight is considered a risk factor for CVD based on evidence linking it to a hypercoagulable state. Considering the prevalence of CVD and obesity in the USA, along with the increased risk for thrombus-related events, anticoagulation plays a significant role in prevention and treatment. Direct oral anticoagulants have taken the place of many traditional anticoagulants. Considering the recently approved indications and continued postmarketing studies conducted with rivaroxaban, this updated review provides data on the overall impact of obesity on this compound. This includes data obtained from both healthy obese volunteers and obese patients with various CVD conditions enrolled in rivaroxaban clinical trials, along with data obtained from postmarketing real-world evidence studies. Assessment of the clinical pharmacology and population pharmacokinetics in obese individuals revealed no clinically relevant effects of increased weight. Additionally, subgroup analyses from each of the pivotal phase III trials supporting the current approved labeling also demonstrated consistent efficacy and safety results in obese patients. Lastly, these findings are further supported by several recent real-world evidence studies assessing the continued effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban. In conclusion, rivaroxaban’s overall pharmacological and clinical profile remained consistent in obese adults when assessed in both drug development and postmarketing studies, supporting the premise that higher weight does not necessitate adjustment in either dose strength or regimen.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism: Use in Patients with Advanced Renal Impairment, Obesity, or Other Weight-Related Special Populations

There are currently more than 7 million patients taking a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC), with more new prescriptions per year than warfarin. Despite impressive efficacy and safety data for the treatment of venous thromboembolism, patients with obesity or advanced renal impairment represented a small portion of the patients enrolled in the phase 3 clinical trials. Therefore, to evaluate the potential use of DOACs in these special populations, clinicians need to have an understanding of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of these agents in these settings. Since data from randomized controlled trials are limited, data from observational trials are helpful in gaining comfort with the use of DOACs in these special populations. Selecting the appropriate dose for each agent is imperative in achieving optimal patient outcomes. We provide an extensive review of the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, phase 3 clinical trials, and observational studies on the use of DOACs in patients with advanced renal impairment, obesity, or other weight-related special populations to provide clinicians with a comprehensive understanding of the data for optimal drug and dose selection.

Safety and Efficacy of Oral Anticoagulants for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients After Bariatric Surgery

Anticoagulation management is challenging in bariatric surgery patients, due to altered gastrointestinal anatomy and potentially reduced absorption. Few studies have evaluated clinical outcomes in this population. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulants in patients with and without a history of bariatric surgery. A retrospective, matched cohort study was conducted, utilizing data from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse. Patients ≥18 years old, with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), and treated with an oral anticoagulant between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2018 were included. Outcomes were compared between bariatric and nonbariatric surgery patients. Secondary analysis compared warfarin to the direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in the bariatric cohort. The primary efficacy outcome was the rate of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism and the primary safety outcome was major bleeding. A total of 1,673 bariatric surgery and 155,619 nonbariatric surgery patients were identified. There was no significant difference in the rate of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (0.83 vs 1.32 per 100 person years; Hazard ratio [HR] 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31 to 1.22; p = 0.17) or major bleeding (5.30 vs 4.87 per 100 person years; HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.37; p = 0.73) between bariatric and nonbariatric surgery patients. In bariatric surgery patients alone, efficacy and safety were similar with warfarin compared with the DOACs. Results of this study suggest that bariatric surgery patients are not at an increased thrombotic or bleeding risk when using oral anticoagulants for NVAF. DOACs may be a reasonable alternative to warfarin.

How I treat obese patients with oral anticoagulants

Obesity has become a major threat to health worldwide. The prevalence of obesity is rapidly increasing, so much so that the World Health Organization has declared obesity as a global epidemic. Obesity is associated with multiple health problems, including venous thromboembolism and atrial fibrillation, both of which are treated with anticoagulation. However, obesity and treatments for obesity such as bariatric surgery can influence absorption, excretion, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of various anticoagulants. This results in uncertainty regarding the best antithrombotic strategies in this population, particularly in the morbidly obese. In the recent years, several studies have attempted to investigate anticoagulation use in this population and provided more insight. Herein, we present 4 cases of anticoagulant use in the obese to illustrate the common challenges faced by clinicians and discuss our approach. Whenever possible, we provide a review of the literature and base our recommendations on the best available evidence.

Bariatric Surgery can Lower the Efficacy of DOACs

A 39-year-old woman who was taking the contraceptive pill was admitted with right leg deep venous thrombosis (DVT). She was started on apixaban tablets, but after 8 days developed proximal progression of the DVT and pulmonary embolism. Her medical history later showed a history of sleeve gastrectomy. The patient responded to a vitamin K antagonist after heparin. The failure of the antithrombotic drug shed light on the efficacy and changed pharmacodynamics of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) after bariatric surgery in the absence of commercially available blood monitoring tests.

Prophylaxis with rivaroxaban after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy could reduce the frequency of portomesenteric venous thrombosis

INTRODUCTION

Portal and mesenteric venous thrombosis is a rare but potentially serious complication after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. There are no consistent studies that prove the safety and effectiveness of oral anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. The objective was to evaluate the effect of rivaroxaban on the frequency of portal and mesenteric venous thrombosis and its safety profile after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data includes all laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomies performed by a single surgeon at Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Hospital between January 2009 and June 2019. All patients received low molecular weight heparin thromboprophylaxis during the whole hospital stay. Between July 2012 and June 2019, patients received additional post-discharge thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban. Patient demographics, impaired renal, post-surgical portal and mesenteric venous thrombosis, and bleeding episodes were registered.

RESULTS

A total of 516 patients were identified; 95 patients were excluded. Results for 421 patients were analysed: 198 received only intrahospital thromboprophylaxis (group 1) and 223 received additional post-discharge thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban (group 2). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups concerning age, sex and body mass index. In group 1, four cases of portal and mesenteric venous thrombosis were registered and no cases were reported in group 2 (p < 0.05). All cases occurred before 30 days after surgery. No bleeding episodes and no adverse reactions were detected in group 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Thromboprophylaxis during the whole hospital stay (two to three days), followed by rivaroxaban 10mg once daily for 10 days after discharge (completing in total 13-14 days of prophylaxis), could reduce cases of post-surgical portal and mesenteric venous thrombosis without an increase in bleeding complications.

Impact of bariatric surgery on oral anticoagulants pharmacology, and consequences for clinical practice: a narrative review

The prevalence of obesity has been steadily increasing in recent years worldwide. At the same time bariatric surgery, the best therapeutic strategy to date in terms of sustainable weight loss and improvement of associated comorbidities has been also increasing. However, these surgeries, whether primarily restrictive or malabsorptive, raise questions about the pharmacology of oral drugs. Among widely used drugs, anticoagulants are the referent therapy to treat some cardiovascular diseases such as atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. How bariatric surgery may impact pharmacological properties of oral anticoagulants, and more specifically, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are difficult to anticipate. In this review, we describe available data concerning the potential impact of bariatric surgery on the pharmacology of oral anticoagulants. The vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) requirements for the same international normalized ratio target are reduced after bariatric surgery. Limited data available for dabigatran 150 mg twice daily indicate a risk of insufficient efficacy in atrial fibrillation after gastric bypass due to probable impaired absorption. Data for rivaroxaban at the prophylactic dose of 10 mg per day suggest no impact of bariatric surgery from 3 days to 8 months post-surgery. However, no conclusive data are available for other anticoagulants or the use of DOACs at therapeutic doses. To date, DOACs are not recommended in patients who have undergone bariatric surgery, because of limited available data. Pending new studies to confirm the predictable pharmacokinetics and safety of DOACs in this population, especially at therapeutic doses, VKAs remain the first option for chronic anticoagulation.

Pharmacokinetic changes post-bariatric surgery: A scoping review

Bariatric surgeries induce structural changes that can alter the absorption of drugs in patients already at risk of polypharmacy. This scoping review aimed to explore pharmacokinetic changes of orally administered drugs in patients post-bariatric surgery, and assess the quality and level of bias. Electronic databases were searched for articles relating to bariatric surgery and pharmacokinetics published between 1998 and 2019. Pre-post studies reporting on pharmacokinetic parameters were included, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess risk-of-bias. A total of 21 studies were included in this review, and changes in absorption were reported in all included studies across 29 drugs. In 11 studies, this change was reported as statistically significant (p<.05), while six reported a nonsignificant change. More drugs exhibited a shorter Tmax and higher Cmax after surgery than otherwise, however changes in AUC were variable. Four studies were assessed as having fair quality while the remainder of the included studies were of good quality and low risk-of-bias. Bariatric surgery alters the absorption of drugs and several mechanisms are implicated to be responsible. Short and long-term monitoring is recommended in patients post-surgery for clinical changes in response to medications. Future research with a higher number of participants and greater control of variables, such as concurrent medications, malabsorptive disorders, and body composition should be considered.

The influence of bariatric surgery on oral drug bioavailability in patients with obesity: A systematic review

Anatomical changes in the gastrointestinal tract and subsequent weight loss may influence drug disposition and thus drug dosing following bariatric surgery. This review systematically examines the effects of bariatric surgery on drug pharmacokinetics, focusing especially on the mechanisms involved in restricting oral bioavailability. Studies with a longitudinal before-after design investigating the pharmacokinetics of at least one drug were reviewed. The need for dose adjustment following bariatric surgery was examined, as well as the potential for extrapolation to other drugs subjected to coinciding pharmacokinetic mechanisms. A total of 22 original articles and 32 different drugs were assessed. The majority of available data is based on Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) (18 of 22 studies), and hence, the overall interpretation is more or less limited to RYGBP. In the case of the majority of studied drugs, an increased absorption rate was observed early after RYGBP. The effect on systemic exposure allows for a low degree of extrapolation, including between drugs subjected to the same major metabolic and transporter pathways. On the basis of current understanding, predicting the pharmacokinetic change for a specific drug following RYGBP is challenging. Close monitoring of each individual drug is therefore recommended in the early postsurgical phase. Future studies should focus on the long-term effects of bariatric surgery on drug disposition, and they should also aim to disentangle the effects of the surgery itself and the subsequent weight loss.