A frailty index and the impact of frailty on postoperative outcomes in older patients after bariatric surgery

Frailty Index as a Predictor of Operative Safety and Efficacy in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery is an effective treatment for obesity and its associated comorbidities. However, the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) for elderly and frail populations remain uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To validate the efficacy and safety of LSG for elderly and frail patients and to assess its impact on overweight and obesity-related comorbidities.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing LSG at a university-affiliated single center between 2009 and 2022 from a prospectively maintained database. Patients were categorized into two cohorts based on age and frailty index: elderly vs younger patients and frail vs non-frail groups. Preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative data were analyzed.

RESULTS

Frailty was associated with statistically significantly higher perioperative complications (%, Clavien-Dindo of III/IV, 8 vs 3) and lower treatment success rates (% Excess Body Weight Loss, six-month, year, and two-year, 58 vs 64, 73 vs 82, 72 vs 81, and 63 vs 76, respectively). Age was not shown to alter the safety or efficacy of the operation.

CONCLUSION

While LSG is a viable option for elderly and frail patients, frailty is a significant predictor of treatment outcomes. A comprehensive assessment of individual factors, including frailty status, is essential for informed decision-making before surgery.

Too Late for a Duodenal Switch? Safety and Effectiveness of Duodenal Switch in Patients over 60 Years Old

INTRODUCTION

The increase in obesity prevalence and longer life expectancy has led to more candidates over 60 pursuing bariatric surgery. While multiple studies have investigated outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in this age group, the outcomes of duodenal switch (DS) require further investigation. This study assessed the safety and effectiveness of DS in patients over 60 compared to those under 60.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted for patients from two tertiary referral centers who underwent either biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch or single-anastomosis duodeno-ileostomy with sleeve from January 2008 to December 2023. Propensity score matching was used to evaluate the effect of age on outcomes, with 51 patients over 60 in group 1 (G1) compared to 153 patients under 60 in group 2 (G2).

RESULTS

At 24 months (follow-up rate of 61% in G1 and 25.5% in G2), G1 had a mean total body weight loss of 41% vs. 35% for G2 (p = 0.437) and mean excess BMI loss of 78% vs. 69% (p = 0.122). G1 had higher complication > 30-day rates (33.3% vs. 13.7%, p = 0.002), reinterventions (19.6% vs. 8.4%, p = 0.030), reoperations (29.4% vs. 13.7%, p = 0.011), and readmissions > 30 days (39% vs. 18.9%, p = 0.003). Most reoperations in G1 were for ventral hernias (46.7%), while in G2, 28.6% were revisions/conversions. Long-term mortality occurred only in G1 (7.8% vs. 0%, p ≤ 0.001), with causes unrelated to bariatric surgery.

CONCLUSION

DS procedures offer comparable weight loss for older patients but have higher complication rates, warranting careful consideration and follow-up.

The perioperative frailty index derived from the Chinese hospital information system: a validation study

BACKGROUND

There are various frailty assessment tools in the world, and the application choice of frailty assessment tools for the elderly perioperative population varies. It remains unclear which frailty assessment tool is more suitable for the perioperative population in China. To validate the Perioperative Frailty Index (FI-32) derived from the Chinese Hospital Information System by investigating the impact of preoperative frailty on postoperative outcomes, and ascertain the diagnostic value of FI-32 for predicting postoperative complications through comparing with the FRAIL scale and the modified Frailty Index (mFI-11).

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary hospital. Elderly patients who were 60 years or older and underwent selective operation were included. The FI-32, FRAIL scale, and mFI-11 were assessed. Demographic, surgical variables and outcome variables were extracted from medical records. The data of readmission and mortality within 30 days and 90 days of surgery were ascertained by Telephone follow-up by professionally trained researchers. Multiple logistic regression was used to examine the association between frailty and complications. Receiver operating characteristic curves(ROC) were used to compare FI-32 with mFI-11 and FRAIL, to explore the predictive ability of frailty.

RESULTS

335 patients qualified for the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study, and among them, 201 (60.0%) were females, and the Median(P25, P75)age at surgery was 69 (65,74) years. The prevalence of frailty in the study population was 16.4% (assessed by FI-32). After adjusting for concomitant variables including demographic characteristics (such as gender, BMI, smoking, drinking, average monthly income and educational level) and surgical factors (such as surgical approach, surgical site, anesthesia method, operation time, intraoperative bleeding, and intraoperative fluid intake), there was a statistically significant association between frailty and the development of postoperative complication after surgery (OR = 3.051, 95% CI:1.460-6.378, P = 0.003). There were also significant differences in mortality within 30 days of surgery, the length of hospital stay (LOS) and the hospitalization costs. FI-32, FRAIL and mFI-11 showed a moderate predictive ability for postoperative complications, the Area Under Curves (AUCs) were 0.582, 0.566 and 0.531, respectively. With adjusting concomitant variables associated with postoperative complications, the AUCs of FI-32, FRAIL and mFI-11 in the adjusted prediction models were 0.824, 0.827 and 0.820 respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The FI-32 has a predictive effect on postoperative adverse outcomes in elderly Chinese patients. Compared to FRAIL and mFI-11, the FI-32 had the same ability to predict postoperative complications, and FI-32 can be extracted directly from HIS, which greatly saves the time for clinical medical staff to evaluate perioperative frailty.

Scientific Evidence for the Updated Guidelines on Indications for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (IFSO/ASMBS)

The 2022 American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) updated the indications for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (MBS), replacing the previous guidelines established by the NIH over 30 years ago. The evidence supporting these updated guidelines has been strengthened to assist metabolic and bariatric surgeons, nutritionists, and other members of multidisciplinary teams, as well as patients. This study aims to assess the level of evidence and the strength of recommendations compared to the previously published criteria.

Scientific evidence for the updated guidelines on indications for metabolic and bariatric surgery (IFSO/ASMBS)

The 2022 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) updated the indications for metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS), replacing the previous guidelines established by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) over 30 years ago. The evidence supporting these updated guidelines has been strengthened to assist metabolic and bariatric surgeons, nutritionists, and other members of multidisciplinary teams (MDTs), as well as patients. This study aims to assess the level of evidence and the strength of recommendations compared to the previously published criteria.

Medical weight loss in older persons with obesity

The prevalence of individuals with obesity or overweight has steadily increased over the past decades both worldwide, and in the United States. This trend is also evident in the older adult population, which has experienced a continuous rise in the number of individuals with overweight or obesity. This is relevant due to the impact of obesity in older adults' quality of life, physical function, morbidity, and healthcare costs. This review aims to provide practical guidance and currently available approaches for healthcare professionals in managing this population. Both non-pharmacological methods such as intensive behavioural therapy, nutritional interventions, and physical activity, as well as anti-obesity medications, are discussed, with a focus on their potential positive and negative effects in older adults. Additionally, bariatric therapy is evaluated, including current procedures available and the associated results and risks in the older population.

Association of preoperative frailty with suboptimal weight loss response among patients undergoing metabolic and bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

Preoperative patient frailty (i.e., aging-related functional decline across multiple physiological systems) has been linked to greater perioperative complications following metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS). This study evaluated whether preoperative patient frailty predicts 1-year suboptimal weight loss response after primary sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).

METHODS

The Bariatric Frailty Score (BFS), an adapted version of the Canadian Study of Health and Aging-Frailty Index based on 10 variables from MBSAQIP, assessed degree of frailty based on number of deficits (i.e., 0-10). Suboptimal response to MBS was defined as < 20% and < 30% percentage total weight loss (%TWL) at 1 year following SG and RYGB, respectively. Multiple linear and logistic regression models evaluated associations of preoperative BFS score with %TWL and %TWL response thresholds, respectively.

RESULTS

Patients (n = 1574; 78.9% female, 28.3% non-white, mean age 45 ± 12 year; 67% SG) had a mean BFS of 1.6 ± 1.3 (range = 0-7). Overall, higher BFS related to lower %TWL after SG and RYGB (ß = - 0.12 and ß = - 0.17, respectively, p = 0.001). Compared to patients with 0-1 deficits (BFS score ≤ 1; n = 785, 49.9%), those with multiple deficits (BFS score ≥ 2; n = 789, 50.1%) had higher odds of suboptimal weight loss response after SG (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.40-2.52, p < 0.001) and RYGB (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.43-3.32, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Having multiple preoperative frailty deficits is associated with higher odds of suboptimal weight loss response after MBS. These findings point to the need for increased frailty screening and appropriate adjunctive interventions (i.e., exercise, nutrition, and cognitive), as these interventions may improve frailty status and MBS outcomes.

Obesity, organ failure, and transplantation: A review of the role of metabolic and bariatric surgery in transplant candidates and recipients

Obesity is a risk factor for kidney, liver, heart, and pulmonary diseases, as well as failure. Solid organ transplantation remains the definitive treatment for the end-stage presentation of these diseases. Among many criteria for organ transplant, efficient management of obesity is required for patients to acquire transplant eligibility. End-stage organ failure and obesity are 2 complex pathologies that are often entwined. Metabolic and bariatric surgery before, during, or after organ transplant has been studied to determine the long-term effect of bariatric surgery on transplant outcomes. In this review, a multidisciplinary group of surgeons from the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons and the American Society for Transplant Surgery presents the current published literature on metabolic and bariatric surgery as a therapeutic option for patients with obesity awaiting solid organ transplantation. This manuscript details the most recent recommendations, pharmacologic considerations, and psychological considerations for this specific cohort of patients. Since level one evidence is not available on many of the topics covered by this review, expert opinion was implemented in several instances. Additional high-quality research in this area will allow for better recommendations and, therefore, treatment strategies for these complex patients.

Obesity, organ failure, and transplantation: a review of the role of metabolic and bariatric surgery in transplant candidates and recipients

Obesity is a risk factor for kidney, liver, heart, and pulmonary diseases, as well as failure. Solid organ transplantation remains the definitive treatment for the end-stage presentation of these diseases. Among many criteria for organ transplant, efficient management of obesity is required for patients to acquire transplant eligibility. End-stage organ failure and obesity are 2 complex pathologies that are often entwined. Metabolic and bariatric surgery before, during, or after organ transplant has been studied to determine the long-term effect of bariatric surgery on transplant outcomes. In this review, a multidisciplinary group of surgeons from the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons and the American Society for Transplant Surgery presents the current published literature on metabolic and bariatric surgery as a therapeutic option for patients with obesity awaiting solid organ transplantation. This manuscript details the most recent recommendations, pharmacologic considerations, and psychological considerations for this specific cohort of patients. Since level one evidence is not available on many of the topics covered by this review, expert opinion was implemented in several instances. Additional high-quality research in this area will allow for better recommendations and, therefore, treatment strategies for these complex patients.

Factors contributing to weight loss success after bariatric procedures in patient over 65 years old: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Although bariatric surgery in patients over 65 years of age gives comparable results to treatment in the younger population, there are still controversies regarding the indications for surgery, risk assessment, and choice between different types of surgery. The study aimed to identify the factors contributing to weight loss success after bariatric surgery in patients over 65 years of age.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a retrospective, multicenter cohort study of patients with obesity aged over 65 years undergoing primary laparoscopic bariatric surgery in the years 2008-2022. Data came from 11 bariatric centers. Patients were divided into two groups: responders (R) who achieved more than 50% EWL and nonresponders (NR) who achieved less than 50% EWL. Both groups were compared. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of weight loss success.

RESULTS

Out of 274 analyzed patients, the average BMI before surgery was 42.9 kg/m 2 . The most common obesity-related diseases were hypertension (85.1%) and type 2 diabetes (53.3%). Sleeve gastrectomy was the most frequently performed procedure (85.4%). Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed preoperative BMI (OR=0.9, 95% CI: 0.82-0.98, P =0.02), duration of diabetes >10 years (OR=0.3, 95% CI: 0.09-0.82, P =0.02), balloon placement (OR=10.6, 95% CI: 1.33-84.83, P =0.03), time since first visit (OR=0.9, 95% CI: 0.84-0.99, P =0.04), preoperative weight loss (OR=0.9, 95% CI: 0.86-0.98, P =0.01), and OAGB (OR=15.7, 95% CI: 1.71-143.99, P =0.02) to have a significant impact on weight loss success 1 year after bariatric surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with higher preoperative weight loss may have a poorer response to surgery. OAGB emerged as the most beneficial type of surgery in terms of weight loss. Intragastric balloon placement before surgery may be effective in patients above 65 years of age and may be considered as a two-stage approach.

Third time's a charm: band to sleeve to bypass

BACKGROUND

Adjustable gastric bands (AGB) are frequently converted to sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) due to weight recurrence or band complications. Such conversions carry a higher-risk than primary procedures. Some patients undergo two conversions-from AGB to SG, and subsequently from SG to RYGB. This presents a unique situation with limited literature on indications and complication rates associated with these double conversions.

METHODS

We examined the 2020-2021 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) Participant Use File to evaluate conversions from AGB to SG and then to RYGB. Patient and operative characteristics, along with outcomes, were evaluated. Descriptive statistics were applied.

RESULTS

We identified 276 patients who underwent a conversion from AGB to SG and then to RYGB. The primary reason for the second conversion (SG to RYGB) was gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) at 55.1%, followed by inadequate weight loss or weight regain (IWL/WR) at 36.9%. The remaining reasons included dysphagia, nausea, vomiting, or others. Patients converted for IWL/WR demonstrated a higher baseline body mass index and prevalence of sleep apnea compared to other cohorts (both p < 0.001). Meanwhile, patients in the "other reasons" group had the highest rate of open surgical approaches (9.1%) and concurrent lysis of adhesions (p = 0.001 and p = 0.022), with correspondingly higher rates of anastomotic leak, reoperations, serious complications, and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing double conversions (AGB to SG to RYGB) do so primarily for GERD or IWL/WR. Further research is required to better define the optimal primary operation for each patient, aiming to reduce the necessity for multiple conversions.

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Patients Over 60 Years Old: A Long-Term Follow-Up

Purpose: This study analyzed the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in patients over 60 years old, in a long-term follow-up, in a high-volume bariatric center. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all patients older than 60 years who underwent LSG in our center from January 2009 to December 2018. A prospectively collected database of 4991 consecutive LSG cases was reviewed. Results: One hundred seventy-nine sleeve gastrectomy procedures were performed in patients older than 60 years, 135 were aged 60-65 years (group A) and 44 were older than 65 years (group B). We reported five cases (2.7%) of early complications: three postoperative hemorrhages, one cardial leakage, and one perigastric abscess. No thromboembolic events or mortality rates were reported. The mean follow-up period was 5.5 years (66 months). The follow-up loss rate was about 29%. At last follow-up, the mean body-mass index/body mass/percentage of excess weight loss values were, respectively, 33.7 ± 7/86.1 ± 21/60.4 ± 28.6 in group A and 32.4 ± 6.4/82.6 ± 18/61.8 ± 33 in group B. We reported 5 (4.0%) trocar site hernias, 1 (0.8%) cardial junction stenosis, and 22 (18%) new outbreaks of gastroesophageal reflux (GERD). There were 7 reinterventions (5.7%): 5 for weight regain and 2 for GERD not responding to medical therapy. There were no statistically significant differences between the two age groups. Conclusions: LSG is a safe and effective treatment for severe obesity in people over 60 years old. There are no differences in results of patients over 65 years and between 60 and 65 years old. Scales that include associated medical problems and the patient's general condition must be considered.

Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery in Patients Older than 65 Years - a Multicenter Study

INTRODUCTION

With the increase in life expectancy and a growing number of people suffering from obesity, bariatric and metabolic surgery is becoming a major concern in the elderly population. The study aimed to collect, systematize and present the available data on the surgical treatment of obesity among Polish patients over 65 years of age.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective study analysed patients over 65 years who underwent laparoscopic bariatric procedures in Poland from 2008 to 2022. The efficacy endpoints were percentage of excess weight loss (EWL%), percentage of total weight loss (%TWL), improvement in obesity-related diseases.

RESULTS

The group consisted of 284 patients (173 women, 60.9%). The mean follow-up was 47.5 months. The mean BMI before surgery was 43.1 kg/m2. 146 (51.4%) patients had T2D, and 244 (85.9%) had HT. The most common procedure was sleeve gastrectomy (82.0%). The mean EWL% after surgery was 50.9%, and the mean TWL% after surgery was 20.6%. There was the statistically significant difference between AGB vs OAGB, SG vs OAGB in %EWL (p = 0.0116, p = 0.009, respectively) and RYGB vs OAGB in %TWL (p = 0.0291). After surgery, 93 patients (63.7%) had complete or partial remission of T2D, and 112 patients (45.9%) had complete or partial remission of HT.

CONCLUSION

Bariatric surgery appears to be a safe and effective method of treatment of obesity in patients over 65 years of age. OAGB seems to have better results in weight loss than SG, RYGB, and AGB in older patients.

Robotic Bariatric Surgery in Older Adults, Is It Safer Than the Laparoscopic Approach? A 7-Year Analysis of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) Database

BACKGROUND

Utilization of the robotic platform in bariatric surgery has increased over the past several years. The population of older adults who benefit from bariatric surgery is also growing. This study evaluated the safety of robotic-assisted bariatric surgery in older adults using the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) Database.

METHODS

Adults who underwent gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy and were ≥ 65 years old between the years 2015 and 2021 were included. The 30-day outcomes were assessed and stratified based on Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification of III-V. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were performed to identify predictors of CD ≥ III complications.

RESULTS

A total of 62,973 bariatric surgery patients were included. Most of the patients (90%) underwent laparoscopic surgery, and the remainder (10%) underwent robotic surgery. Robotic sleeve gastrectomy (R-SG) was associated with lower odds of developing CD ≥ III complications compared to three other procedures (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 0.741; confidence interval (CI), 0.584-0.941; p 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Bariatric surgery using a robotic approach is considered safe for older patients. Robotic sleeve gastrectomy (R-SG) has the lowest morbidity and mortality rates compared to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (L-SG), laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (L-RYGB), and robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (R-RYGB). The findings of this study can help surgeons and their elderly patients to make informed decisions regarding the safety of different bariatric surgical approaches.

A 5-year characterization of trends and outcomes in elderly patients undergoing elective bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

The North American population with severe obesity is aging and with that so will the number of elderly patients (≥ 65 years) meeting indications for metabolic surgery. Trends in bariatric delivery in this population are poorly characterized and outcomes remain conflicting, limiting potential uptake and delivery.

METHODS

The MBSAQIP database was used to identify elderly patients (≥ 65 years) undergoing elective bariatric surgery from 2015 to 2019. Our objectives were to analyze their unique characteristics, surgical operative trends, and outcomes by comparing to a non-elderly cohort. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors of serious complications and 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

There was a total of 751,607 patients, 5.3% (n = 39,854) were elderly. Mean ages were 43 ± 11 years (non-elderly) versus 68 ± 3 years (elderly). Elderly patients were less likely to be female (70.7% elderly; 80.1% non-elderly) and had lower BMI (43.17 ± 6.64 kg/m² elderly; 45.42 ± 7.87 kg/m² non-elderly). They had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, lower functional status, more insulin dependent diabetes, and hypertension, among other comorbidities. There were no clinically significant differences between the most frequently performed bariatric surgery. Sleeve gastrectomy remained the most common (73.7% non-elderly; 72.3% elderly); however, operative time was longer among the elderly. Functional status was most predictive for both serious complications (OR 1.72; CI 1.53-1.94) and mortality (OR 2.92; CI 1.98-4.31). Surgery among elderly patients was associated with poorer 30-day postoperative outcomes across all categories and was independently associated with serious complications (OR 1.23; CI 1.17-1.30, p < 0.001; AR 4.64%) and 30-day mortality (OR 2.49; CI 2.00-3.11, p < 0.001; AR 0.27%), after adjusting for comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

After adjusting for comorbidities, functional status remains the most predictive factor for poor outcomes; however, elderly patients have increased 30-day odds of serious complications and 30-day mortality, suggesting a need to tailor our approach to these individuals that carry a unique operative risk.

Does ASA classification effectively risk stratify patients undergoing bariatric surgery: a MBSAQIP retrospective cohort of 138,612 of patients

INTRODUCTION

It is important to appropriately risk stratify bariatric surgery patients, as these patients often have obesity-related comorbidities which can increase postoperative complication risk but also benefit the most from bariatric surgery. We aimed to evaluate the utility of risk stratification using ASA class for bariatric surgery patients and assessed predictive factors of postoperative complications.

METHODS

The 2020 MBSAQIP database was analyzed, and an ASA-deemed high-risk cohort (class IV) and normal-risk (ASA class II and III) cohort were compared. Univariate analysis was performed to characterize differences between cohorts and to compare complication rates. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine factors associated with increased odds of postoperative complications.

RESULTS

We evaluated 138 612 patients with 5380 (3.9%) considered high-risk and 133 232 (96.1%) normal-risk. High-risk patients were more likely to be older (46.2 ± 12.0vs.43.4 ± 11.9, p < 0.001), male (30.9%vs.18.4%, p < 0.001), have higher BMI (51.4 ± 10.2vs.44.9 ± 7.4, p < 0.001), and have more comorbidities. High-risk patients were more likely to have increased 30-day serious complications (4.5%vs.2.8%, p < 0.001) and death (0.2%vs.0.1%, p = 0.001) but not anastomotic leak (0.2%vs.0.2%, p = 0.983). Multivariate models showed ASA class IV patients were at higher odds for any serious complication by 30 days (aOR 1.36, 95%CI 1.18-1.56, p < 0.001) but not for death (aOR 1.04, 95%CI 0.49-2.21, p = 0.921). The factor independently associated with the highest odds of complication in both models was functional status preoperatively (partially dependent aOR 2.06, 95%CI 1.56-2.72, p < 0.001; fully dependent aOR 3.19, 95%CI 1.10-9.28, p = 0.033 for any serious complication; partially dependent aOR 5.08, 95%CI 2.16-12.00, p < 0.001 for death).

CONCLUSIONS

While elevated ASA class correlates with increased serious complications, pre-operative functional status appears to have a much greater contribution to odds of serious complications and mortality. These findings question the utility of using ASA to risk stratify patients peri-operatively and provides evidence for using a simpler and more practical functional status approach.

2022 American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) Indications for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery

MAJOR UPDATES TO 1991 NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH GUIDELINES FOR BARIATRIC SURGERY: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is recommended for individuals with a body mass index (BMI) >35 kg/m2, regardless of presence, absence, or severity of co-morbidities.MBS should be considered for individuals with metabolic disease and BMI of 30-34.9 kg/m2.BMI thresholds should be adjusted in the Asian population such that a BMI >25 kg/m2 suggests clinical obesity, and individuals with BMI >27.5 kg/m2 should be offered MBS.Long-term results of MBS consistently demonstrate safety and efficacy.Appropriately selected children and adolescents should be considered for MBS.(Surg Obes Relat Dis 2022; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2022.08.013 ) © 2022 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. All rights reserved.

2022 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO): Indications for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery

Major updates to 1991 National Institutes of Health guidelines for bariatric surgery.

Association between vitamin D3 levels and frailty in the elderly: A large sample cross-sectional study

Background

Frailty is recognized as a cornerstone of geriatric medicine. Accurately screening and identifying frailty can promote better quality and personalized medical services for the elderly. Previous studies have shown that the association between vitamin D and frailty in the elderly population is still controversial. More research is needed to explore the association between them.

Materials and methods

We used three waves of data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Based on the widely accepted AAH FRAIL Scale, we measured and evaluated the participants’ frailty from five aspects: fatigue, resistance, ambulation, illness, and loss of weight. All possible relevant variables are included. Machine learning XGboost algorithm, the Least Absolute Shrinkage Selection Operator (LASSO) regression and univariate logistic regression were used to screen variables, and multivariate logistic regression and generalized additive model (GAM) were used to build the model. Finally, subgroup analysis and interaction test were performed to further confirm the association.

Results

In our study, XGboost machine learning algorithm explored the relative importance of all included variables, which confirmed the close association between vitamin D and frailty. After adjusting for all significant covariates, the result indicated that for each additional unit of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3, the risk of frailty was reduced by 1.3% with a statisticaldifference. A smooth curve was constructed based on the GAM. It was found that there was a significant negative correlation between 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and the risk of frailty.

Conclusion

There may be a negative correlation between 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and the risk of frailty. However, more well-designed studies are needed to verify this relationship.

Sleeve Gastrectomy in Septuagenarians: a Case-Control Study

PURPOSE

There are few studies published referring to bariatric surgery in patients older than 70 years. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether there are benefits to performing sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in patients over 70 years of age and to compare the results with a younger control group.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were retrospectively collected from a Private Clinic's electronic medical records of patients undergoing SG between June 2017 and September 2020. Inclusion criteria were patients older than 70 years [septuagenarian group (SpG)] who met all institutional protocols. Patients in the control group (CG) were selected with a 1:1 ratio and under 60 years of age, according to body mass index and comorbidities. The primary endpoint of the study was to evaluate the morbidity and mortality during the 30-day postoperative period and percentage of total weight loss (%TWL), and improvement of comorbidities after 1 year of follow-up.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were included in the study. Both groups were similar regarding gender, weight, BMI, and presence of DM. The 30-day morbidity and mortality were similar between the groups. The patients in the SpG had 26.9% of %TWL and the CG, 28% (p = 0.32). The remission rate of DM (50% vs. 85% p = 0.01) and SAH (30% vs. 64% p = 0.04) was lower for septuagenarian patients.

CONCLUSION

The sleeve gastrectomy surgery performed in patients over 70 years of age is safe. The early results suggest similar benefits regarding weight loss and improvement of comorbidities to those having SG before age 60.

An Analysis of the Modified Five-Item Frailty Index for Predicting Complications following Free Flap Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The modified five-item frailty index is a validated and effective tool for assessing risk in surgical candidates. The authors sought to compare the predictive ability of the modified five-item frailty index to established risk factors for complications in free flap breast reconstruction.

METHODS

The 2012 to 2018 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for free flap breast reconstructive procedures. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis models were used to assess how modified five-item frailty index and factors commonly used to risk stratify (age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, and history of smoking) were associated with complications.

RESULTS

Of the total 10,550 cases, 24.1 percent experienced complications. A high modified five-item frailty index score is associated with a higher overall rate of postoperative complications (p < 0.001). This significant trend was demonstrated in both surgical (p < 0.001) and medical (p < 0.001) complications. When controlling for other risk factors commonly used for risk stratification such as age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, and history of smoking, the modified five-item frailty index was significantly associated with medical (OR, 1.75; 95 percent CI, 1.37 to 2.22; p = 0.001) and any complications (OR, 1.58; 95 percent CI, 1.29 to 1.93; p < 0.001) and had the largest effect size. Assessing for specific complications, the modified five-item frailty index is the strongest independent predictor of reoperation (OR, 1.41; 95 percent CI, 1.08 to 1.81; p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

The modified five-item frailty index is a useful predictor of postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing free flap breast reconstruction when compared to other historically considered risk factors for surgical complications.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

Nutritional domains in frailty tools: Working towards an operational definition of nutritional frailty

Different methods have been proposed for the assessment of the nutritional status in frailty phenotypes. In the present narrative review article, we have summarized the number and specifications of nutritional items in existing frailty tools, in order to develop a possible means of assessment and operational definition of the nutritional frailty phenotype. In six different databases until December 2019, we searched for original articles regarding frailty tools (i.e., scales, indexes, scores, questionnaires, instruments, evaluations, screening, indicators), analyzing each tool regarding nutritional items. We identified 160 articles describing 71 frailty tools. Among the selected frailty tools, 54 were community-based (70 %), 17 hospital-based (22 %), 4 validated in long-term care institutions for older adults (LTCIOA) (5.1 %) and 2 validated in both community- and hospital-based settings, including LTCIOA (2.5 %). Fifty-two of these tools (73 %) included at least one nutritional item. Twenty-two (42 %) reported two or more nutritional items. The items were grouped in the following categories: A) anthropometric measurements, B) laboratory measurements, and C) other nutritional-related measurements. Anthropometric measurements stood out compared to all other items. Nutritional items are included in the majority of frailty tools, strengthening the concept that they may have a direct implication on an increased risk of adverse health-related outcomes in frail subjects. This supports the development of the concept of nutritional frailty as an independent frailty phenotype. Subsequent steps will be to assess the contribution of each nutritional item to a possible operational definition of nutritional frailty and define the items that may best identify this new frailty phenotype.

Is Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery Safe and Effective in Patients over 60 Years of Age?" an Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

To evaluate, mid-term outcomes between elderly patients (EP, i.e., age > 60 years old) and young patients (YP, i.e., age < = 60 years old) who underwent laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Studies comparing EP versus YP for bariatric surgery published until April 2020 were selected and submitted to a systematic review and meta-analysis. After LSG, overall morbidity and specific post-operative complication rates (i.e., leak, abscess, hemorrhage, and reoperation) were significantly more frequent in EP compared with those in YP. Surgical outcomes were similar between EP and YP after LRYGB. Both procedures achieved weight loss, but it was statistically greater in YP compared with that in EP. In summary, this meta-analysis suggests that laparoscopic bariatric surgery is a safe and effective treatment in EP compared with that in YP.

The Accumulating Deficits Model for Postoperative Mortality and Readmissions: Comparison of four Methods Over Multiple Calendar Year Cohorts: Brief Title: Stability of the Modified Frailty Index

OBJECTIVE

To assess four measures of the accumulating deficits model of frailty for postoperative mortality and readmissions including their stability over time.

BACKGROUND

Frailty has been assessed by multiple methods. It is unclear whether variation in how frailty is measured is important and would be stable over time.

METHODS

Rockwood's 57-item frailty index (FI) was mapped onto 14,568 ICD9 diagnosis codes from Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Database for the state of Florida (HCUP-SID-FL) for calendar years 2011-2015, inclusive, with 962 ICD9 codes matching onto 42 items. This became the modified frailty index (mFI) used. Three measures of the mFI were differentiated: the number of admission diagnoses, number of chronic conditions upon admission, and number of increased deficits accumulated during the admission. The Charlson Co-Morbidity Index was a fourth measure of frailty. The mFI of patients who survived or died and were readmitted or not were compared.

RESULTS

Across all years, 4,796,006 patient observations were compared to the number of diagnoses matched on the 42 items of the mFI. The median mFI scores for each method was statistically significantly higher for patients who died compared those that survived and for patients readmitted compared to patients not re-admitted for all years. There was little-to-no variation in the year to year median mFI scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The four methods of calculating frailty performed similarly and were stable. The actual method of determining the accumulated deficits may not be as important as enumerating their number.

Modified Frailty Index Predicts Postoperative Complications following Panniculectomy in the Elderly

Due to the high complication rate of panniculectomies, preoperative risk stratification is imperative. This study aimed to assess the predictive value of the 5-item modified frailty index (mFI-5) for postoperative complications in the elderly following panniculectomy.