Clinical utility of ultrasound to prospectively monitor distraction of magnetically controlled growing rods

Ultrasonographic assessment of magnetic growing rods overestimates the lengthening of the thoracic spine compared to radiographs in early-onset scoliotic patients

PURPOSE

Magnetic growing rods (MGRs) are one of the most common procedures to treat early-onset scoliosis (EOS). Radiographic examinations (X-ray) or ultrasonographic (US) assessments are used to evaluate the lengthening of the rods. X-ray exposes patients to radiation, while the US has not been validated and may be affected by the radiologist's ability to assess elongation. The research question of the present study is to compare the difference between US and X-ray growth assessments in EOS patients treated with MGRs.

METHODS

The study enrolled 65 patients consecutively from July 2011 to July 2022. Noninvasive lengthening was performed every four months, and X-ray follow-up was performed at different intervals. An experienced radiologist assessed the mean US rod elongation per session. The mean elongation/session of T2-T12 and T2-S1 was calculated, and the results were compared using an independent t-test.

RESULTS

The mean age at operation was 8.8 ± 2 years, and the mean follow-up was four ± two years. The average rod elongation assessed by the US was 3.1 ± 0.1 mm. The average rod elongation evaluated by X-ray was 1.2 ± 2.9 mm (T2-T12) and 1.8 ± 1.9 mm (T2-S1). The difference between the values measured by US and X-ray was statistically significant in the T2-T12 group (p < 0.05) and not significant in the T2-S1 group (p = 0.34).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the most extensive single-center study comparing US and X-ray data for MGRs in EOS patients. US overestimates thoracic spine elongation compared to X-ray. US elongation analysis could be appropriate in long thoracolumbar curves.

Longitudinal comparison of direct medical cost, radiological and health-related quality of life treatment outcomes between traditional growing rods and magnetically controlled growing rods from preoperative to maturity

Background

Magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) have replaced traditional growing rods (TGR) in the past decade, however, a comparison of their direct costs and treatment outcomes based on real longitudinal data is lacking. This study aims to compare the direct cost and treatment outcomes between TGR and MCGR, whilst incorporating complications, reoperations and changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) throughout the entire treatment course.

Methods

Patients with early onset scoliosis (EOS) who underwent initial growing rod surgery between 2003 and 2016 at a tertiary scoliosis clinic were studied with longitudinal data. Accumulated direct medical costs were calculated based on the unit cost of surgeries of each TGR and MCGR, costs incurred for any rod exchange or remedial surgery for post-operative complication. Treatment outcomes were evaluated via: Patient’s HRQoL using SRS-22r questionnaire, and radiological parameters (including major curve correction, spine length gains, spinal balance) throughout the treatment until maturity.

Results

A total of 27 EOS patients (16 MCGR, 11 TGR) were studied. Total direct cost of index surgery for MCGR was HKD$223,108 versus lower cost of HKD$135,184 for TGR (p < 0.001). At 2–3 years post-index surgery, accumulative total direct medical cost of MCGR and TGR became most comparable (TGR:MCGR ratio = 1.010) and had reached neutrality between the two groups since. Radiological parameters had no intergroup differences at maturity. For HRQoL, TGR group had shown the trend of less pain (domain score mean difference: 0.53, p = 0.024) post-index surgery and better self-appearance (domain score mean difference: 1.08, p = 0.017) before fusion. Higher satisfaction with treatment (domain score mean difference: 0.76, p = 0.029) was demonstrated by TGR patients at fusion/maturity. MCGR had negative (r_s = -0.693) versus TGR’s positive (r_s = 0.989) correlations (p < 0.05) of cost and SRS-22r total scores at 2–3 years post-index surgery.

Conclusions

From index surgery to maturity, TGR demonstrated better satisfaction with treatment by patients and comparable overall HRQoL with MCGR during the treatment course, as MCGR did not show apparent benefit despite less surgeries and cost neutrality between the two groups at 2–3 years post-index surgery.

The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations for Musculoskeletal Ultrasound - Part II: Joint Pathologies, Pediatric Applications, and Guided Procedures

The second part of the Guidelines and Recommendations for Musculoskeletal Ultrasound (MSUS), produced under the auspices of EFSUMB, following the same methodology as for Part 1, provides information and recommendations on the use of this imaging modality for joint pathology, pediatric applications, and musculoskeletal ultrasound-guided procedures. Clinical application, practical points, limitations, and artifacts are described and discussed for every joint or procedure. The document is intended to guide clinical users in their daily practice.

Optimizing Expansion Clinic for Patients With Magnetic Controlled Growth Rods

In 2017, members of the Pediatric Spine Study Group reported that 80% of new growth-friendly implants inserted were magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs). MCGRs are usually expanded more often than every 6 months, as was general practice with traditional growth rods. The growing volume of expansion visits is managed variably at different centers. Although there is existing research comparing MCGRs with traditional systems for efficacy and complications, there is limited literature regarding how expansion clinics are managed. This article reviews current practices such as scheduling, expansion verification, billing, and other key parameters for running expansion clinics.

"Law of Temporary Diminishing Distraction Gains": The Phenomenon of Temporary Diminished Distraction Lengths With Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods That Is Reverted With Rod Exchange

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective study.

OBJECTIVES

To study the increasing divergence between targeted and achieved distractions observed with magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR)lengthening, and the relationship of this reduced rate of achieved lengthening with remaining rod length.

METHODS

Patients with early onset scoliosis (EOS) who underwent MCGRs with minimum 2-year follow-up were consecutively enrolled. Targeted and achieved lengths were compared. Correlation between percentage of lengthening achieved from targeted length was identified with the timing of rod exchanges.

RESULTS

A total of 20 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The mean age at index surgery was 9.5 years and mean postoperative follow-up was 68 ± 28 months. Of these, 8 patients had at least one rod exchange that occurred at 23 ± 4 months. A decrease in rate of achieved lengthening was observed when compared with targeted distractions. The achieved lengthening drops from 86% of targeted length at the first distraction to only 58.8% at the 21st distraction episode for the first set of rods. After rod exchange, the average achieved lengthening went back up to 81.3% of the targeted length but subsequently had a gradual reduction to 35% at the 19th distraction episode.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose a "law of temporary diminishing distraction gains" that MCGR users should be aware of when monitoring rod lengthening. Diminishing distraction length gains is observed as the rod is lengthened and is a phenomenon independent of patient factors. It is only temporary as the rates of achieved lengthening returns to baseline after rod exchange.

Radiation Reduction Strategies in Pediatric Orthopaedics

INTRODUCTION

Pediatric orthopaedic patients have the potential for significant radiation exposure from the use of imaging studies, such as computed tomography and bone scintigraphy. With the potential for long-term treatment, such as is required for scoliosis or osteogenesis imperfecta, patients are at even greater risk of radiation-induced carcinogenesis.

DISCUSSION

Although an association between radiation and cancer risk is evident, causation is difficult to prove because comorbidities or genetic predispositions may play a role in the higher baseline rates of malignancy later in life. Efforts have been made over the years to reduce exposure using more modern imaging techniques and simple radiation reduction strategies. Educational efforts and clinical practice guidelines are decreasing the rate of computed tomography scan use in pediatrics. Although considerable work is being done on the development of radiation-free imaging modalities, imaging that uses ionizing radiation will, in the near term, be necessary in specific circumstances to provide optimal care to pediatric orthopaedic patients.

CONCLUSION

Knowledge of the ionizing radiation exposure associated with commonly used tests as well as radiation-reduction strategies is essential for the optimal and safe care of pediatric orthopaedic patients.

Preoperative and Postoperative Imaging in Idiopathic Scoliosis: What the Surgeon Wants to Know

The term idiopathic scoliosis covers a broad spectrum of spinal deformities in the pediatric population without an underlying congenital anomaly of the spine. Depending on the age of presentation, it has both characteristic clinical and imaging features and a different prognosis. The radiologist should provide the surgeon with critical information to assess the degree of deformity and eventually plan surgery. Thoracic deformities and lung volume must also be part of the preoperative assessment. Imaging has a critical role in postsurgical follow-up and in surgical complications. This review highlights the importance of common terminology and measurement methods to avoid incongruences. The different imaging modalities are discussed with their indications and limitations. We pay special attention to imaging modalities that can help the surgeon assess skeletal maturation reliably and thus predict the prognosis of scoliosis. Radiation protection and the risk of cumulative radiation exposure in these patients is emphasized.

[Nonfusion procedures in pediatric scoliosis]

The treatment of early onset scoliosis (EOS) in children is a complex and demanding challenge in the treatment of spinal deformities. Conservative treatment with physiotherapy is indicated in mild forms with a Cobb angle from 10° and additionally a corset treatment with a Cobb angle of more than 20°. After exhaustion of the conservative measures or a progression of spinal scoliosis of 10° or deformities of more than 35°, a surgical approach should be considered in order to prevent respiratory insufficiency as well as severe postural and thoracic deformities. In situations where growth is still ongoing fusion operations can lead to stunted growth, a crankshaft phenomenon or degeneration of alignment. Meaningful alternatives to a fusion are so-called growing rods as a distraction-based nonfusion technique, e.g. traditional growing rods (TGR) and magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) or as a further method a vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR) device. The advantages and disadvantages of each operative procedure must be considered with respect to the risk profile of each patient and the experience of the surgeon in order to guarantee the best possible treatment.

How frequent should the radiographic examination be to monitor magnetically controlled growing rods? A retrospective look two to seven years postoperatively

PURPOSE

Magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) allow more frequent outpatient lengthenings to better mimic the physiological growth. The assessment of distractions with radiographs raised concerns regarding ionizing radiation exposure in growing children. The aim was to assess the necessity of radiographs after every lengthening of MCGR.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 30 consecutive patients (19F, 11 M) treated in a single institution between 2011 and 2017. Planned radiographs were taken based on a protocol, updated over the years to involve less frequent acquisitions. Unplanned radiographs were obtained after a patient complaint or a significant clinical examination finding. Outcome measures were preoperative and postoperative radiographic measurements, and complications such as proximal and distal junctional kyphosis and failure, rod or actuator breakage, collapse of previously achieved height or failure to lengthen and worsening of deformity.

RESULTS

Mean age at surgery was 7.5 (4-11) years. Mean follow-up was 45 (24-84) months. Mean number of lengthenings and radiographs per patient were 14.4 (8-23), and 13.2 (5-46), respectively. Nine patients (30%) experienced a total of 13 mechanical complications. Almost all complications were detected in unplanned radiographs. The probability of detecting a mechanical complication was significantly lower (p < 0.00001) in planned radiographs.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiographs taken after routine lengthenings of MCGR are not likely to reveal any significant finding, since only 0.9% of planned radiographs displayed a mechanical complication. Exposing growing children to radiation with an intention of checking the MCGR device after every lengthening could not be justified. Obtaining post-lengthening radiographs with a decreased frequency and after a significant complaint or clinical finding may be considered.

Sonography of Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods: A Quality Initiative in the Creation of a Multidisciplinary Clinic

Objective:

The MAGEC (Magnetic Expansion Control) rods were introduced to a medical institution in 2015. The rod expansion procedures were initially evaluated with radiographs. The staff undertook a quality initiative to reduce radiation exposure by utilizing sonography.

Material and Methods:

The radiation dose for a typical visit was measured by examining DICOM imaging data, stored in PACS. Imaging visit time was determined from the difference between times of first radiograph/sonogram before distraction to last radiograph/sonogram after distraction.

Results:

The 21 patients (8 male, 13 female) were an average age of 11.4 ± 2.82 years (age at implant = 7.5 ± 1.94) when evaluated. The average length of time for a radiographic visit was 40.7 ± 20.7 minutes, whereas a sonography visit was 10.7 ± 3.7 minutes. Radiation dose per study visit prior to the introduction of the MAGEC clinic was 0.42 ± 0.39 mSv. Given an ideal patient schedule, the MAGEC clinic could reduce radiation dose by 1.3 to 2.5 mSv annually, with 95% confidence.

Conclusion:

This quality improvement study demonstrated a reduction in radiation exposure and imaging time. The added benefits were providing a successful multidisciplinary imaging clinic and creation of a new exam that aligned with the “ultrasound first” initiative.

Systematic investigation of metallosis associated with magnetically controlled growing rod implantation for early-onset scoliosis

AIMS

To investigate metallosis in patients with magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) and characterize the metal particle profile of the tissues surrounding the rod.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study of patients with early onset scoliosis (EOS) treated with MCGRs and undergoing rod exchange who were consecutively recruited between February 2019 and January 2020. Ten patients were recruited (mean age 12 years (SD 1.3); 2 M:8 F). The configurations of the MCGR were studied to reveal the distraction mechanisms, with crucial rod parts being the distractable piston rod and the magnetically driven rotor inside the barrel of the MCGR. Metal-on-metal contact in the form of ring-like wear marks on the piston was found on the distracted portion of the piston immediately outside the barrel opening (BO) through which the piston rod distracts. Biopsies of paraspinal muscles and control tissue samples were taken over and away from the wear marks, respectively. Spectral analyses of the rod alloy and biopsies were performed to reveal the metal constituents and concentrations. Histological analyses of the biopsies were performed with haematoxylin and eosin staining.

RESULTS

Titanium (Ti), vanadium (V), and neodymium (Nd) concentrations in the biopsies taken near the wear marks were found to be significantly higher than those in the control tissue samples. Significantly increased Nd concentrations were also found in the tissues near the barrel of the MCGR. Chronic inflammation was revealed by the histological studies with fibrosis and macrophage infiltration. Black particles were present within the macrophages in the fibrotic tissues.

CONCLUSION

Ti and V were generated mainly at the BO due to metal-on-metal contact, whereas the Nd from the rotor of the MCGR is likely released from the BO during distraction sessions. Phagocytotic immune cells with black particles inside raise concern regarding the long-term implications of metallosis. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(10):1375-1383.

Level of Experience Does Not Influence the Accuracy of Radiographic and Ultrasound Measurements of Magnetically Controlled Growing Rod Distractions

BACKGROUND

Magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) have become a popular surgical option for the treatment of early-onset scoliosis. Both radiographs and ultrasound are currently used to measure the amount of length achieved when MCGRs are distracted. Previous studies have investigated the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of radiographic and ultrasound measurements of MCGR distraction. Some authors have reported that there is a "learning curve" in measuring MCGR lengthening with ultrasound, suggesting that new users require several months of experience before they can accurately perform the measurements. The goal of this study was to determine whether surgical experience of the rater is associated with the accuracy of radiographic and ultrasound measurements of MCGR distraction.

METHODS

Six raters evaluated 29 deidentified radiographs and 30 ultrasound images from early-onset scoliosis patients with MCGR. Raters had varying levels of experience, ranging from a senior fellowship-trained pediatric orthopaedic surgeon to a junior orthopaedic surgery resident. Raters measured the amount of rod distraction in 2 sessions spaced 2 weeks apart. All raters were provided with a document demonstrating the radiographic and ultrasound measurement techniques before the first round of measurements. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated.

RESULTS

Excellent intraobserver and interobserver agreement was achieved for both radiographic and ultrasound measurements of MCGR distraction. Subanalysis based on experience level showed that excellent intraobserver agreement was maintained with no evidence of decreased reliability in raters with less experience.

CONCLUSIONS

Excellent intraobserver and interobserver agreement was obtained with radiographic and ultrasound measurements of MCGR distraction, regardless of the experience level of the rater. Posting a document with the radiographic and ultrasound measurement techniques in the orthopaedic surgery clinic, and perhaps also the radiology reading room may help avoid inaccurate measurements of distraction length secondary to a learning curve.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-diagnostic.

Current status of the magnetically controlled growing rod in treatment of early-onset scoliosis: What we know after a decade of experience

The magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) has had approximately 10 years of clinical experience worldwide. Clinical effectiveness to control early-onset scoliosis is consistent even at final surgery. MCGRs have significantly lower relative percentage of infection or wound complications as compared to traditional growing rods. Most common complications include foundation failure and failure of distraction. Contouring of the rod especially at the proximal segment while accommodating for the straight actuator remains a difficult task and its failure may lead to proximal junctional kyphosis. Unique complications of MCGR include clunking, temporary diminishing distraction gains, and metallosis. Temporary reductions in distraction gains are observed as the MCGR lengthens but return to normal baseline distraction gains after rod exchange. Lack of standardization for rod configuration, distraction strategies and decisions of whether to keep the rods in situ, remove without fusion surgery or to perform spinal fusion at skeletal maturity will require further study.

Lengthening of magnetically controlled growing rods caused minimal pain in 25 children: pain assessment with FPS-R, NRS, and r-FLACC

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive case series.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to investigate the pain associated with magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) lengthening procedures. MCGRs have gained popularity because they offer non-surgical lengthening procedures in early-onset scoliosis (EOS) instead of semi-annual open surgery elongations with traditional growing rods. Many aspects of MCGR treatment have been investigated, but pain in conjunction with distraction is only sparsely described in the literature.

METHODS

Pain intensity was assessed in 25 EOS patients before, during and after MCGR lengthening procedures in an outpatient setup. They underwent at least two (range 2-16) lengthening procedures prior to this study. The pain intensity was estimated using patient-reported Faces Pain Scale (FPS-R), caregiver-reported pain numeric rating scale (NRS), and NRS and revised Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale (r-FLACC) by two medically trained observers. The inter-rater reliability and correlation between instruments were analyzed.

RESULTS

23 of 25 EOS patients (8- to 16-year old) with mixed etiology were able to self-report pain. The average pain intensity was mild: median 1 (range 0-6) on all four instruments on a 0-to-10 scale. Afterward, 22/25 patients (88%) were completely pain free and the remaining 3 patients had a pain score of 1. MCGR stalling (i.e. clunking) was encountered in 14/25 (56%) of the patients without impact on the pain intensity.

CONCLUSIONS

The average maximum pain intensities during the lengthening procedures were mild and pain ceased within few minutes. The inter-rater reliability was good to excellent for NRS and r-FLACC, and there were high correlations between all the four pain instruments, indicating high criterion validity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

The effect of magnetically controlled growing rods on three-dimensional changes in deformity correction

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective radiographic study.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the three-dimensional (3D) changes in deformity correction with magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) distractions. MCGRs can achieve similar coronal plane correction as traditional growing rods. The changes in the sagittal and axial planes are unknown and should be studied as these factors reflect potential for proximal junctional kyphosis and rotational deformity. Frequent MCGR distractions may potentially improve axial plane deformities to the same extent as coronal and sagittal plane deformities.

METHODS

Early onset scoliosis (EOS) patients who underwent dual MCGRs with minimum 2-year follow-up were included in this study. 3D reconstructions of 6-monthly biplanar images were used to study changes in coronal, sagittal and axial planes. Changes in growth parameters (body height and arm span) were scaled to changes in coronal Cobb angles, sagittal profile (T1-12, T4-12, L1-L5, L1-S1), and rotational profile at the proximal thoracic, main thoracic and lumbar curves, and pelvic parameters (sagittal pelvic tilt, lateral pelvic tilt and pelvis rotation).

RESULTS

A total of 10 EOS patients were studied. The mean age at index surgery was 8.2 ± 3.0 years and mean postoperative follow-up of 34.3 ± 9.5 months. Six patients had rod exchange at mean 29.5 ± 11.8 months after initial implantation. Despite consistent gains in body height and arm span, the main changes in coronal and rotational profiles only occurred at the initial rod implantation surgery with only small changes occurring with subsequent follow-ups. Patients with higher preoperative proximal junctional angles had flattening of the sagittal plane occurring at initial surgery with early rebound. No changes in pelvic parameters were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3D changes with MCGR are mainly observed with initial rod implantation and no significant changes are observed with distractions. The MCGR can prevent deformity progression in the axial plane.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Mean 6-Year Follow-up of Magnetically Controlled Growing Rod Patients With Early Onset Scoliosis: A Glimpse of What Happens to Graduates

BACKGROUND

There is no agreement on frequency of distractions of magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) but more frequent and smaller amounts of distractions mimic physiological spine growth. The mid- to long-term follow-up and management at skeletal maturity is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze patients with mean 6 yr of follow-up and describe the fate of MCGR graduates.

METHODS

Early onset scoliosis (EOS) patients treated with MCGRs with minimum 4 yr of follow-up and/or at graduation were studied. Parameters under study included Cobb angle, spine and instrumented lengths, and rod distraction gains. Relationship between timing of rod exchanges with changes in rate of lengthening was studied.

RESULTS

Ten EOS patients with mean 6.1 yr of follow-up were studied. The greatest Cobb angle correction occurred at the initial implantation surgery and was stable thereafter. Consistent gains in T1-12, T1-S1, and instrumented segment were observed. Rate of lengthening reduced after the first year of use but improved back to initial rates after rod exchange. Seven of the ten patients experienced complications with reoperation rate of 40% for rod distraction failure and proximal foundation problems. Only mild further improvements in all radiological parameters were observed pre- and postfinal surgery. No clinically significant curve progression was observed for rod removal only. All postfinal surgery parameters remained similar at postoperative 2 yr.

CONCLUSION

This study provides an outlook of the end of MCGR treatment. Although this is a fusionless procedure, instrumented segments do experience stiffness limiting further correction and length gain during final surgery whether fusion or rod removal is performed.

The Crooked Rod Sign: A New Radiological Sign to Detect Deformed Threads in the Distraction Mechanism of Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods and a Mode of Distraction Failure

STUDY DESIGN

Case report.

OBJECTIVE

To report a unique mechanical failure of magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) that is related to continuous rod slippage.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Despite the growing popularity of MCGR in the management of patients with early onset scoliosis, postoperative complications and reoperations are not uncommon. Unique complications or unplanned reoperations are observed in patients with MCGRs that are not seen in traditional growing rods. The complications include rod slippage, mismatch between targeted and achieved distraction length, metallosis, and actuator pin fracture. We have identified an unreported failure mechanism whereby deformed threads occur in the internal distraction mechanism of the MCGR. This phenomenon may indicate increased MCGR internal screw friction and increased distraction resistance. Increased friction and resistance ultimately led to distraction failure and revision surgery.

METHODS

A girl with early onset scoliosis (EOS) was treated by dual MCGRs. She developed proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and continuous rod slippage. Distractions in the out-patient clinic and under sedation did not achieve successful rod lengthening. A tell-tale "crooked rod" radiological sign was identified by angulation between the actuator and the extendable portion of the rod.

RESULTS

Rod exchange was performed and she is now 2 years after revision surgery with successful lengthening episodes. Upon review of the extracted MCGR, distraction was not possible even after rod removal and was only resumed after the screw was manually reinserted along its correct threads.

CONCLUSION

Deformed threads is a complication that cannot be reverted without rod removal and exchange. Users should be aware of this potential failure mechanism and proceed to early rod exchange rather than attempting any further distractions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Minimum 2-Year Experience with Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods for the Treatment of Early-Onset Scoliosis: A Systematic Review

Magnetically controlled growing rods have been used to treat early-onset scoliosis for the last 9 years; however, few studies have been published, with only short-term follow-up. The aim of the present study is to systematically review the outcomes of magnetically controlled growing rods in the treatment of early-onset scoliosis with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Studies were included if patients with early-onset scoliosis (scoliosis diagnosed before 10 years of age) underwent implantation of magnetically controlled growing rods with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. The literature review and data extraction followed the established preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis guidelines. Data of distraction frequency, number of distractions, distracted length, Cobb angle, kyphosis, T1-T12 length, and T1-S1 length preoperatively, postoperatively, and at final follow-up were collected. Data regarding complications and unplanned reoperations were also extracted. The mean values of these parameters were calculated, or pooled meta-analysis was performed if available. Ten articles were included in this systematic review, with a total of 116 patients and a follow-up period between 23 and 61 months. The mean preoperative Cobb angle and kyphosis angle were 60.1° and 38.0°, respectively, and improved to 35.4° and 26.1° postoperatively. At final follow-up, the Cobb and kyphosis angles were maintained at 36.9° and 36.0°, respectively. The average preoperative T1-T12 and T1-S1 lengths were 180.6 mm and 293.6 mm, respectively, and increased to 198.3 mm and 320.3 mm postoperatively. T1-T12 and T1-S1 lengths were 212.3 mm and 339.3 mm at final follow-up, respectively. The overall rate of patients with complications was 48% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-0.58) and unplanned reoperation 44% (95% CI, 0.33-0.55) after sensitivity analysis. The current evidence from different countries with a minimum of a 2-year follow-up suggests that magnetically controlled growing rods are an effective technique to treat pediatric scoliosis and promote spine growth. However, nearly half of patients still developed complications or required unplanned reoperations.

A comparison of growth among growth-friendly systems for scoliosis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The optimal method for surgical treatment of early onset scoliosis is currently unknown. Although the aim of growth-friendly systems is to reduce the curve and maintain growth, there is no consensus on how to measure spinal growth during and after the treatment. Different measurements of different segments (T1-S1, T1-T12, instrumented length) are used for different time points to evaluate growth. The aim of this review is to assess what measurements are used and to compare the growth-friendly systems based on spinal growth during treatment.

METHODS

The electronic MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for original articles that reported growth for traditional growing rods (TGR), vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib expansion technique (VEPTR), Shilla, magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR), and Luque-trolley systems. All measurements were recorded, and weighted averages calculated in centimeter per year were compared.

RESULTS

We included 52 studies (26 TGR, 12 MCGR, 6 VEPTR, 4 Luque trolley, 1 Shilla, and 3 mixed). Often only one segment was reported (T1-S1 length in 22 studies, T1-T12 length in two studies, and instrumented length in five studies). The remaining 22 studies reported T1-S1 length in combination with T1-T12 length (15 studies) or instrumented length (eight studies). Spinalgrowth achieved by initial correction only was a considerable 3.9 cm (based on 34 studies) as well as the spinal growth achieved by the final fusion surgery (2.3 cm in four studies). To specifically assess growth achieved with the system, length gain after initial surgery and before final fusion in growth system graduates was considered. Only four TGR studies reported on this "true" spinal growth with 0.6 and 0.3 cm/y in the T1-S1 and T1-T12 segment, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Reporting on spinal growth is currently inadequate and does not allow a good comparison of different techniques. However, all systems often report growth similar to Dimeglio's T1-S1 spinal growth of 1 cm/y. It should be recognized though that a considerable portion of the reported spinal growth is the result of the initial and final surgical correction and not due to the growth-friendly implant.

A novel technique for the subfascial insertion of magnetically controlled growing rods - The Alder Hey technique

Purpose:

In this study, we would like to describe a novel technique for subfascial insertion of magnetically controlled growing rods using chest drain during surgery for early-onset scoliosis.

Materials and Methods:

Posterior approach, surgical dissection to the spine is performed exposing the relevant anatomy to allow placement of pedicle screws always in the distal construct and pedicle screws or hooks in the proximal construct. To allow easy passage of the Magnetic Expansion Control (MAGEC) rod, as well as easy maneuvering of the rod in either the cranial to caudal direction, we use a chest drain of size 24 French diameter as a tunnel. This allows surgeons to fit the nonflexible part of MAGEC rod in the middle of the deformity and cut to length passed through the chest drain from a cranial to caudal position and then chest drain is removed.

Results:

A total of 40 children with early-onset scoliosis had insertion of MAGEC rods using this technique. There were 21 female and 19 male patients. Early-onset scoliosis etiology is idiopathic in 20 patients, neuromuscular in 16 patients, and others in 4 patients. Median age across all groups was 7 years (range 4–13) at the time of surgery. Follow-up ranged from 11 to 56 months with a median of 24 months.

Conclusion:

The use of a chest drain during subfascial passage of magnetically controlled growing rod is a safe, reliable, reproducible novel technique. This shortens overall time of surgery in our experience.

Cumulative Anesthesia Exposure in Patients Treated for Early-Onset Scoliosis

BACKGROUND

Early-onset scoliosis (EOS) is a potentially life-threatening condition that requires early intervention to prevent severe deformity and pulmonary compromise. Observational studies have demonstrated that children receiving multiple procedures requiring general anesthesia are at a higher risk for adverse neurocognitive outcomes. We sought to characterize anesthetic exposure in EOS patients and to determine risk factors for increased exposure. We hypothesized that patients treated for EOS were at risk of receiving large amounts of cumulative anesthesia in childhood because of the need for early intervention to preserve pulmonary function. We sought to determine which factors impacted the amount of anesthesia patients received over the course of treatment.

METHODS

Records of all EOS patients treated at a tertiary referral center from 2000 to 2014 were reviewed. Patients with a minimum two-year follow-up, under age 10 at diagnosis, were included. Anesthesia was recorded in three categories: 1) orthopedic surgeries; 2) nonorthopedic surgeries; and 3) imaging/associated procedures. Diagnoses included congenital, idiopathic, neuromuscular, and syndromic scoliosis. Treatment groups were: observation, bracing, Mehta casting, growing spine, or fusion.

RESULTS

Mean cumulative anesthesia time was 1606 minutes. Patients with neuromuscular (mean 2132 minutes, p = .006) or congenital scoliosis (1875 minutes, p < .001) received more anesthesia than those with idiopathic scoliosis (754 minutes). Patients treated by fusion (2036 minutes, p < .001) or growing spine (2855 minutes, p < .001) received more anesthesia than those treated by bracing.

CONCLUSIONS

Disease severity, non-idiopathic diagnoses, and longer length of follow-up were associated with increased anesthesia. Patients who presented at earlier ages, and those treated by Mehta casting, were more likely to exceed three hours of anesthesia prior to age 3.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Comparison of Intended Lengthening of Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods: Ultrasound Versus X-Ray

BACKGROUND

In the treatment of early onset scoliosis (EOS), there has been a trend to use magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) in order to reduce the number of surgeries. To confirm the amount of lengthening, spine radiographs were required. Recently, ultrasound (US) has been added to monitor lengthening of MCGR to avoid radiation exposure. Our aim was to determine whether US is as accurate as plain radiography (x-ray) in determining the amount of length achieved at individual MCGR lengthening episodes.

METHODS

Retrospective study; inclusion criteria: EOS cases with dual MCGR with minimum 12 months follow-up. Intended lengthening IL (mm), lengthening on US (mm) and x-ray (mm) were documented from medical records for both right and left rods. Primary (no surgery before MCGR) and conversion (other types of instrumentation were replaced with MCGR) cases were reviewed separately. P-values determined with analysis of variance.

RESULTS

Sixteen cases with 100 lengthening episodes met the inclusion criteria. Eleven were primary MCGR cases with 67 episodes. Mean follow-up was 19±5 months. Significant differences were found between IL (3.4±1 mm), US (2.7±1.9 mm), and x-ray (4.1±2.2 mm) (P<0.001). The difference between IL and x-ray was minimal, but statistically significant (P=0.046). US showed statistically lower values than both IL (P=0.001) and x-ray (P<0.001). The mean ratio of x-ray/IL, US/IL, and US/x-ray were 1.1, 0.75, and 0.84, respectively. Five conversion cases had 33 episodes. Mean follow-up was 21±2 months. Significant differences were found between IL (3.4±0.8 mm), US (1.3±0.8 mm), and x-ray (1.7±0.9 mm) (P<0.001) but there was no significant difference between US and x-ray (P=0.283). IL was significantly higher than both US (P< 0.001) and x-ray (P<0.001). The mean ratio of x-ray/IL, US/IL, and US/x-ray were 0.64, 0.41, and 1.1, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

US can provide confirmatory information of noninvasive lengthening of MCGR. However, US tended to underestimate the achieved length as measured by x-ray in primary cases. Conversion cases demonstrate better concordance between US and x-ray but in these cases less overall length was achieved at each lengthening episode.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Reliability of Rod Lengthening, Thoracic, and Spino-Pelvic Measurements on Biplanar Stereoradiography in Patients Treated With Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the inter- and intraobserver reliability of thoracic, spino-pelvic, and rod lengthening measurements made on biplanar spinal stereoradiography (EOS imaging) in children treated with magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

MCGR treatment aims to gain spine length while gradually correcting the spinal deformity. Monitoring thoracic and spino-pelvic parameters is crucial for successful management. EOS imaging is widely used for diagnosis and monitoring of children with Early Onset Scoliosis. However, there is a paucity of literature on the reliability of thoracic and spino-pelvic parameters on EOS imaging in children treated with MCGR.

METHODS

Three independent reviewers independently read a random assortment of 20 whole spine posteroanterior and lateral radiographs from patients treated with MCGR. The measurements were repeated 4 weeks after the initial read. The following radiological parameters were measured: Cobb angle of the main and compensatory curves, coronal balance, coronal T1-S1 and T1-T12 length, chest width and depth at T6, pelvic inlet width, MCGR distracted lengths, global kyphosis, proximal and distal junctional angle, lordosis, sagittal balance, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt and sacral slope. Statistical analysis was performed with paired t test and Cronbach alpha for inter- and intraobserver reliability.

RESULTS

All measurements had good or excellent intra- and interobserver reliability (α>0.8; P < 0.05), except measurements of the proximal junctional angle which showed only poor intra- and interobserver reliability for patients with an upper instrumented vertebra cranial to T4.

CONCLUSION

EOS imaging is reliable for diagnosis and monitoring of children with Early Onset Scoliosis treated with MCGR. EOS imaging is particularly excellent for assessment of MCGR lengthening. Diagnosis and interpretation of early proximal junctional kyphosis within the cervicothoracic junction should be made with caution.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Rod Lengthening With the Magnetically Controlled Growing Rod: Factors Influencing Rod Slippage and Reduced Gains During Distractions

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the factors that are associated with rod slippage and to study the pattern of achieved length gain with a standard distraction methodology.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Ability to achieve successful magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) distraction is crucial for gradual spine lengthening. Rod slippage has been described as a failure of internal magnet rotation leading to a slippage and an inability to distract the rod. However, its onset, significance, and risk factors are currently unknown. In addition, how this phenomenon pertains to actual distracted lengths is also unknown.

METHODS

A total of 22 patients with MCGR and at least six distraction episodes were prospectively studied. Patients with rod slippage occurring less than six distraction episodes were considered early rod slippage whereas those with more than six episodes or have yet to slip were grouped as late rod slippage. The association of parameters including body habitus, maturity status, age of implantation, total number of distractions, months of distraction from initial implantation, initial and postoperative Cobb angle, T1-T12, T1-S1, T5-T12 kyphosis, curve flexibility, instrumented length, and distance between magnets in dual rods and between the magnets and apex of the curve with early or late onset of rod slippage were studied. Differences between expected and achieved distraction lengths were assessed with reference to rod slippage episodes and rod exchanges to determine any patterns of diminishing returns.

RESULTS

Patients had mean age of 7.1 years at diagnosis with mean follow-up of 49.8 months. A mean 32.4 distractions were performed per patient. Early rod slippage occurred in 14 patients and late rod slippage occurred in eight patients. Increased height, weight, body mass index, older age, increased T1-12 and T1-S1 lengths, and less distance between magnets were significantly associated with early rod slippage. Expected distraction lengths did not translate to achieve distraction lengths and reduced gains were only observed after achieving one-third of the allowable distracted length in the MCGR. Length gains return to baseline after rod exchange.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to specifically analyze the impact of rod slippage on distraction lengths and the risk factors associated with its onset and frequency. Increased body habitus and reduced distance between internal magnets significantly influenced rod slippage events. Diminishing returns in distracted length gains were only observed after a period of usage.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Observed Length Increases of Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods are Lower Than Programmed

BACKGROUND

Magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) are increasingly used in the treatment of early onset scoliosis (EOS). Few studies have reported whether desired lengthening can reliably be achieved, or if prior spine instrumentation and large tissue depths affect lengthening. In this clinical study of EOS patients, it was hypothesized that increases in rod length would equal programmed increases, patients with prior spine instrumentation would lengthen less than patients without prior surgery, and larger tissue depths would decrease lengthening success.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted on EOS patients with single and dual MCGRs placed between April 2014 to September 2015 and distracted at a single institution. Rod distraction was measured at each visit using ultrasound. Differences between programmed and actual distraction for each patient, and between groups with and without prior spine instrumentation, were determined by 2-tailed t tests. Regression and correlation were used to determine the relationship between tissue depth and length increases.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were included, 18 males, 13 females, age 8.1 (±2.5) years, with major curves measuring 60 (±14.6) degrees at time of MCGR insertion. In the 12 patients with prior instrumentation, time from initial growing rod placement to MCGR insertion was 23.1 (±10.6) months. The number of surgical procedures before MCGR insertion was 2.8 (±2.0). Total length increase relative to the programmed distraction was 86% (±21) (P<0.001). Length increases for patients with and without prior surgery were 87% (±23) and 86% (±19), respectively (P>0.9). Total lengthening was inversely proportional to tissue depth (r=0.38, P<0.01); the decrease in lengthening achieved was 2.1%/mm of tissue depth.

CONCLUSIONS

Increases in rod length were 14% lower than the programmed distraction. Prior instrumentation did not impact the amount of rod distraction. Greater distance between the rod and the skin surface negatively affected the magnitude of distraction.

Managing the Pediatric Spine: Growth Assessment

Management of pediatric spinal deformities requires an accurate prediction of growth spurts to allow for timely initiation of treatment and prevention of curve progression. Determining remaining growth potential is also important for avoiding prolonged unnecessary treatment, e.g. bracing for patients nearing skeletal maturity. Many clinical and radiological growth parameters have been developed to aid clinicians in growth prediction. Of these, several commonly used measures such as height and arm span growth trends, timing of menarche, and the Risser sign are mostly retrospective and lack strong predictive utility. Bone age assessments, such as digital skeletal age and the distal radius and ulna classification, are more accurate parameters, but further research is required to determine interethnic variations and develop their role in management decisions.

Learning Curve in Monitoring Magnetically Controlled Growing Rod Distractions With Ultrasound

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a learning curve exists for ultrasound measurement of magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) distractions.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

For patients managed by MCGRs, close monitoring of interval distraction length gains is important to determine whether the distractions are translating into actual spine growth. Radiographs are the criterion standard for measuring length gains, but ultrasound has been shown to be effective in monitoring distraction lengths without radiation exposure. It is, however, an operator-dependent tool and thus the accuracy of ultrasound measurement of distracted length may improve with experience.

METHODS

This is a prospective correlation analysis of patients who underwent MCGR treatment for scoliosis. The study period was inclusive of 19th February 2013 to 31st March 2015. All subjects were consecutively recruited in a prospective manner. Data regarding date of the distraction visit, and the interval radiograph and ultrasound measurements of the distracted lengths were collected. Only those episodes with both radiograph and ultrasound performed were used for analysis. The mean differences in change of radiograph and ultrasound measurements were plotted to determine correlation differences and to observe for a learning curve.

RESULTS

A total of 379 distraction episodes were analyzed. The mean differences between ultrasound and radiograph measurements per distraction episode were -0.3 mm for the right rod and -0.1 mm for the left rod. For learning curve analysis, there were three distinct timepoints in which the difference of correlation became significantly better and were described as clusters. The correlation in the first cluster (19th February 2013 to 15th October 2013) was 0.612 (right rod) and 0.795 (left rod), the second cluster (16th October 2013 to 20th May 2014) was 0.879 (right rod) and 0.918 (left rod), and the third cluster (21st May 2014 to 31st March 2015) was 0.956 (right rod) and 0.932 (left rod). Thus, a plateau was observed at the second cluster, which translated to 97 to 146 rod measurements.

CONCLUSION

Correlation between radiograph and ultrasound measurements is reasonable to begin with but improves with time. During initial use, successful distractions should correlate between the clinical feel and ultrasound confirmation. Although the absolute value may not be accurate and may require radiographs to confirm, with time and experience, ultrasound measurements can then be more reliable.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Growing spine deformities: Are magnetic rods the final answer?

Treatment paradigms for Early Onset Scoliosis have changed from fusion to fusionless methods as the harmful effects of early fusion on the growing spine and thorax were realized. Magnetic rods are a recent addition to fusionless technology for controlling scoliosis in a growing spine. The clinical evidence base on magnet driven growth rods (MDGR) has accumulated over the last 4 years. It has implications for reduction in the number of repeat surgeries required with similar complications as the traditional growth rods (TGR) and at a higher initial cost. However in terms of patient psyche and avoidance of repeat surgeries which are necessary with the TGR, MDGR treatment works out less expensive in the long run with definitely better patient comfort. The authors look at the available literature coupled with their own experience to discuss the current status, limitations and future prospects for this type of technology.

Advances in growing rods treatment for early onset scoliosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The goal of treatment in early onset scoliosis is to correct the deformity while allowing the thoracic growth for optimal cardiopulmonary functions. Growing rods treatment is a distraction-based, growth-friendly method that is commonly used in treatment of early onset scoliosis with its specific indications. Magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) method has been introduced to avoid morbidity of recurrent lengthening procedures. In this review, recent developments in traditional growing rods and MCGR are summarized.

RECENT FINDINGS

As the experience with growing rods increased and favorable results were reported, its indications have expanded. Recent studies focused on patient outcomes and complications. Another area of interest is the effects of growing rods in the sagittal spinal alignment. Midterm results demonstrated that MCGR treatment is promising but not free of complications. In MCGR, there is no consensus on the frequency and amount of distraction per session. Rod contouring and behavior of the magnet under MRI are major issues.

SUMMARY

Growing rods treatment successfully controls the deformity while preserving the growth of spine and thorax, despite high complication rates. Magnetically controlled systems are introduced to avoid repetitive surgical lengthening procedures. Although preliminary results are promising, there are still significant challenges and unknowns for MCGR.

Frequent small distractions with a magnetically controlled growing rod for early-onset scoliosis and avoidance of the law of diminishing returns

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of frequent small distractions with a magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) on spinal length gain and achieved distraction length in children with early-onset scoliosis (EOS), and to determine whether the law of diminishing returns applies to this group of patients with MCGR.

METHODS

A consecutive series of 3 males and 4 females with EOS who underwent MCGR implantation at a mean age of 10.2 years and were followed up for a mean of 3.8 years were reviewed. Distraction was aimed at 2 mm monthly. The coronal Cobb angle, T1-S1 length gain, and achieved distraction length were measured at 6-monthly intervals.

RESULTS

The mean total number of distractions was 31. Four of the patients had problems that may have affected distractions. The mean coronal Cobb angle improved post-operatively and was maintained throughout the follow-up period. The mean T1-S1 length gain and achieved distraction length varied over the follow-up period and did not diminish with repeated lengthening.

CONCLUSIONS

Frequent small distractions with the MCGR for EOS enable T1-S1 and achieved distraction length gain without significant reduction in gain after repeated lengthening.