1
|
Kondapavulur S, Scheer JK, Safaee MM, Clark AJ. Completely Minimally Invasive Implant Removal and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Adjacent Segment Disease: Case Series and Operative Video. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2024:01787389-990000000-01086. [PMID: 38451097 DOI: 10.1227/ons.0000000000001121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Adjacent segment disease is a relatively common late complication after lumbar fusion. If symptomatic, certain patients require fusion of the degenerated adjacent segment. Currently, there are no posterior completely minimally invasive techniques described for fusion of the adjacent segment above or below a previous fusion. We describe here a novel minimally invasive technique for both implant removal (MIS-IR) and adjacent level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for lumbar stenosis. METHODS Demographic, surgical, and radiographic outcome data were collected for patients with lumbar stenosis and previous lumbar fusion, who were treated with MIS-IR and MIS-TLIF through the same incision. Radiographic outcomes were assessed postoperatively and complications were assessed at the primary end point of 3 months. RESULTS A total of 14 patients (7 female and 7 male), with average age 64.6 years (SD 13.4), were included in this case series. Nine patients had single-level MIS-IR with single-level MIS-TLIF. Three patients had 2-level MIS-IR with single-level MIS-TLIF. Two patients had single-level MIS-IR with 2-level MIS-TLIF. Only 1 patient had a postoperative complication-hematoma requiring same-day evacuation. There were no other complications at the primary end point and no fusion failure at the hardware removal levels to date (average follow-up, 11 months). Average increases in posterior disk height and foraminal height after MIS-TLIF were 4.44, and 2.18 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION Minimally invasive spinal IR can be successfully completed along with adjacent level TLIF through the same incisions, via an all-posterior approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sravani Kondapavulur
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Justin K Scheer
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Michael M Safaee
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Aaron J Clark
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Denisov A, Rowland A, Zaborovskii N, Ptashnikov D, Kondrashov D. Moderate sagittal plane deformity patients have similar radiographic and functional outcomes with either anterior or posterior surgery. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2024; 33:620-629. [PMID: 38151636 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-08075-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to compare the functional and radiographic outcomes of two surgical interventions for adult spinal deformity (ASD): anterior lumbar interbody fusion with anterior column realignment (ALIF-ACR) and posterior approach using Smith-Peterson osteotomy with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation (TLIF-Schwab2). METHODS A retrospective cohort study included 61 ASD patients treated surgically between 2019 and 2020 at a single tertiary orthopedic specialty hospital. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (ALIF-ACR, 29 patients) and Group 2 (TLIF-Schwab2, 32 patients). Spinopelvic radiographic parameters and functional outcomes were evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months postsurgery. RESULTS Perioperative outcomes favored the ALIF-ACR group, with significantly smaller blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and operative time. Radiographic and functional outcomes were similar for both groups; however, the ALIF-ACR group did have a greater degree of correction in lumbar lordosis at 12 months. Complication profiles varied, with the ALIF-ACR group experiencing mostly hardware-related complications, while the TLIF-Schwab2 group faced dural tears, wound dehiscence, and proximal junctional kyphosis. Both groups had similar revision rates. CONCLUSION Both ALIF-ACR and TLIF-Schwab2 achieved similar radiographic and functional outcomes in ASD patients with moderate sagittal plane deformity at 1-year follow-up. However, the safety profiles of the two techniques differed. Further research is required to optimize patient selection for each surgical approach, aiming to minimize perioperative complications and reoperation rates in this challenging patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anton Denisov
- Hospital Quironsalud San Jose, Madrid, Spain
- 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Andrea Rowland
- San Francisco Orthopaedic Residency Program and St. Mary's Medical Center, 450 Stanyan St., San Francisco, CA, 94117, USA.
| | - Nikita Zaborovskii
- Vreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
- Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
| | - Dmitrii Ptashnikov
- Vreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
- North-Western State Medical University named after I. I. Mechnikov, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
| | - Dimitriy Kondrashov
- San Francisco Orthopaedic Residency Program and St. Mary's Medical Center, 450 Stanyan St., San Francisco, CA, 94117, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Levy AS, Maddy K, Murray A, John DL, Kumar V, Urakov T. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with placement of steerable banana cage: A single-center retrospective analysis of radiographic parameters of success. Radiography (Lond) 2024; 30:163-167. [PMID: 38035428 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2023.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2023] [Revised: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is among the most utilized methods for the surgical treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease. The TLIF has advanced significantly with several iterative changes since its inception in the early 1980s, with the advent of several generations of interbody types, shapes, and materials. Steerable curvilinear interbodies are among the most recent innovations in this space and may offer biomechanical advantages, namely in preservation of lumbar and segmental lordosis. While radiographic parameters have been investigated for other cage shapes and lumbar interbody fusion techniques, no study has investigated postoperative radiographic outcomes specific to TLIFs done with curvilinear interbodies. METHODS This study is a retrospective review of TLIFs performed with curvilinear interbodies between 2019 and 2022 at a single institution. Upright radiographs were obtained preoperatively and at several timepoints postoperatively. Radiographic variables including interspace height and segmental lordosis were collected. RESULTS 26 surgeries with 32 curvilinear interbodies were performed across 3 years. There was significant increase in segmental lordosis at the L4-L5 (p = 0.0183) and L5-S1 levels (p = 0.004) as well as interspace height postoperatively at levels L3-L4 (p = 0.011) and L4-L5 (p = 0.002). Pain as measured with the numeric rating scale significantly improved in the overall cohort postoperatively (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS TLIF with curvilinear interbody placement increases segmental lordosis and interspace height at the L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels, and increased interspace height at the L3-L4 and L4-L5 levels. Further investigation into additional radiographic parameters is warranted and expanded cohort size would benefit deeper analysis of other spinal levels. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE As an increasing number of cage designs and materials are brought to market, studies such as this allow for better understanding of cage specific outcomes allowing for better informed device selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A S Levy
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, 1095 NW 14th Terrace, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - K Maddy
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, 1095 NW 14th Terrace, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - A Murray
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, 1095 NW 14th Terrace, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - D L John
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, 1095 NW 14th Terrace, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - V Kumar
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, 1095 NW 14th Terrace, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - T Urakov
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, 1095 NW 14th Terrace, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Weinstein MA, Ayala GA, Roura R, Christmas KN, Warren DH, Simon P. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with an expandable interbody device: Two-year clinical and radiographic outcomes. NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY JOURNAL 2023; 16:100286. [PMID: 38025939 PMCID: PMC10652136 DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
Background The use of interbody cages as an adjunct to lumbar spinal fusion remains an important technique to enhance segmental stability, promote solid arthrodesis, maintain neuroforaminal decompression, and preserve/improve segmental lordosis. Appropriate segmental lumbar lordosis and sagittal balance is well-known to be critical for long-term patient outcomes. This study sought to evaluate the radiographic and clinical results of TLIF in patients using an articulating, expandable cage. Primary endpoint was clinical and radiographic outcomes, including complications, at 12 and 24 months. Methods A total of 37 patients underwent open single-level or 2-level TLIF by a single surgeon using an expandable cage with concomitant bilateral pedicle screws and posterolateral arthrodesis. Clinical outcomes included ODI and VAS for back and legs. Radiographic outcomes included pelvic incidence and tilt, lumbar and segmental lordoses, and disc height at the operative level(s). All outcomes were collected at baseline, 2-weeks, 6-weeks, 3-months, 6-months, 12-months, and 24-months postop. Results A total of 28 patients were available for analysis. Nine patients failed to follow-up at 24 months. Mean ODI scores showed significant improvement, from pre-to-postoperative at 24 months (55%; p<.0001). VAS for back and legs was significantly lower at 24 months on average by 72 and 79%, respectively (p<.0001 for both). Both segmental and lumbar lordoses significantly improved by 5.3° and 4.2° (p<.0001 and p=.049), respectively. Average disc height improved by 49% or 6.1 mm (p<.001). No device-related complications nor instances of measured subsidence. One patient had a superficial infection, and another had an intraoperatively repaired incidental durotomy. Conclusions The use of an expandable cage contributed to improvement in both segmental and lumbar lordosis with no reported complications at 24-month follow-up. All clinical measures significantly improved as well. The expandable cage design represents an effective and safe option to increase cage size and allow significant segmental lordosis correction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc A. Weinstein
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine of the University of South Florida Morsani School of Medicine, 13330 USF Laurel Drive, Tampa, FL, USA
- Florida Orthopaedic Institute, 13020 Telecom Prkw. N., Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Giovanni A. Ayala
- Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education, 4115 W Spruce St, Tampa, FL 33607, USA
| | - Raúl Roura
- Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education, 4115 W Spruce St, Tampa, FL 33607, USA
| | - Kaitlyn N. Christmas
- Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education, 4115 W Spruce St, Tampa, FL 33607, USA
| | - Deborah H. Warren
- Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education, 4115 W Spruce St, Tampa, FL 33607, USA
| | - Peter Simon
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine of the University of South Florida Morsani School of Medicine, 13330 USF Laurel Drive, Tampa, FL, USA
- Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education, 4115 W Spruce St, Tampa, FL 33607, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tanasansomboon T, Robinson JE, Anand N. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Strategies for Creating Lordosis with a Posterior Approach. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2023; 34:643-651. [PMID: 37718110 DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2023.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to review the outcomes concerning lumbar lordosis restoration after the MIS-TLIF and to present strategies to create lumbar lordosis by using this MIS posterior approach. MIS-TLIF is an effective MIS lumbar interbody fusion that can achieve lumbar lordosis restoration. Several crucial steps aid in this sagittal profile correction during the MIS-TLIF, including the appropraite prone positioning, optimizing disc space preparation, maximizing disc space height, anterior interbody cage placement, and reducing the spondylolisthesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teerachat Tanasansomboon
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 444 South San Vicente Boulevard, Suite 901, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA; Board of Governors Regenerative Medicine Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Orthopedics, Center of Excellence in Biomechanics and Innovative Spine Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Jerry E Robinson
- University of Pittsburg Medical Center (UPMC), Harrisburg, PA, USA
| | - Neel Anand
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 444 South San Vicente Boulevard, Suite 901, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhang JK, Greenberg JK, Javeed S, Benedict B, Botterbush KS, Dibble CF, Khalifeh JM, Brehm S, Jain D, Dorward I, Santiago P, Molina C, Pennicooke BH, Ray WZ. Predictors of Postoperative Segmental and Overall Lumbar Lordosis in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Consecutive Case Series. Global Spine J 2023:21925682231193610. [PMID: 37522797 DOI: 10.1177/21925682231193610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective Case-Series. OBJECTIVES Due to heterogeneity in previous studies, the effect of MI-TLIF on postoperative segmental lordosis (SL) and lumbar lordosis (LL) remains unclear. Therefore, we aim to identify radiographic factors associated with lordosis after surgery in a homogenous series of MI-TLIF patients. METHODS A single-center retrospective review identified consecutive patients who underwent single-level MI-TLIF for grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis from 2015-2020. All surgeries underwent unilateral facetectomies and a contralateral facet release with expandable interbody cages. PROs included the ODI and NRS-BP for low-back pain. Radiographic measures included SL, disc height, percent spondylolisthesis, cage positioning, LL, PI-LL mismatch, sacral-slope, and pelvic-tilt. Surgeries were considered "lordosing" if the change in postoperative SL was ≥ +4° and "kyphosing" if ≤ -4°. Predictors of change in SL/LL were evaluated using Pearson's correlation and multivariable regression. RESULTS A total of 73 patients with an average follow-up of 22.5 (range 12-61) months were included. Patients experienced significant improvements in ODI (29% ± 22% improvement, P < .001) and NRS-BP (3.3 ± 3 point improvement, P < .001). There was a significant increase in mean SL (Δ3.43° ± 4.37°, P < .001) while LL (Δ0.17° ± 6.98°, P > .05) remained stable. Thirty-eight (52%) patients experienced lordosing MI-TLIFs, compared to 4 (5%) kyphosing and 31 (43%) neutral MI-TLIFs. A lower preoperative SL and more anterior cage placement were associated with the greatest improvement in SL (β = -.45° P = .001, β = 15.06° P < .001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS In our series, the majority of patients experienced lordosing or neutral MI-TLIFs (n = 69, 95%). Preoperative radiographic alignment and anterior cage placement were significantly associated with target SL following MI-TLIF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin K Zhang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jacob K Greenberg
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Saad Javeed
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Braeden Benedict
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | | | - Jawad M Khalifeh
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Samuel Brehm
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Deeptee Jain
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ian Dorward
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Paul Santiago
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Camilo Molina
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Wilson Z Ray
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Aoki Y, Inoue M, Takahashi H, Nakajima A, Sonobe M, Terajima F, Nakajima T, Sato Y, Kubota G, Sato M, Yoh S, Ohyama S, Saito J, Norimoto M, Eguchi Y, Orita S, Inage K, Shiga Y, Ohtori S, Nakagawa K. Postoperative change in lumbopelvic alignment after short-segment transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion is related to preoperative postural difference in lumbar lordosis. J Orthop Sci 2023; 28:321-327. [PMID: 34955349 DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2021.11.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Revised: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative changes in lumbar lordosis (LL) after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and the related factors are not well-understood. Recently, the preoperative difference in LL between standing and supine positions (DiLL) was proposed as a factor for predicting postoperative radiologic outcomes after short-segment TLIF. This study investigated the influence of DiLL on mid-term radiological outcomes after short-segment TLIF. METHODS Sixty-six patients with lumbar degenerative disease treated with short-segment TLIF (1-2 levels) who underwent lumbar spine standing radiographs at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, and 5 years postoperatively were divided into DiLL (+) and DiLL (-) groups (preoperative DiLL ≥0° and <0°, respectively). Associations between the postoperative change in LL and DiLL and clinical outcomes (Oswestry disability index (ODI) and Nakai score) were evaluated. RESULTS Temporary restoration of LL (+4.5°) until 1 year postoperatively and a subsequent decrease in LL from 1 to 5 years postoperatively (-5.3°) was observed in the DiLL (+) group. No postoperative change in LL was observed in the DiLL (-) group. Postoperative changes in LL were mainly observed in non-fused segments. The postoperative change in LL (ΔLL) until 1 year postoperatively had a significant positive association with DiLL (p = 0.00028), whereas ΔLL from 1 to 5 years postoperatively showed a significant negative association with DiLL (p = 0.010) and a positive association with Nakai score (p = 0.028). ΔLL until 5 years postoperatively showed a significant positive association with postoperative ODI improvement (p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS DiLL (+) patients showed a specific time course with temporary LL restoration until 1 year postoperatively and a subsequent decrease in LL from 1 to 5 years postoperatively. Patients with larger postoperative increase in LL until 5 years postoperatively and lesser decrease in LL from 1 to 5 years postoperatively tended to show better mid-term clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuchika Aoki
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Eastern Chiba Medical Center, Togane, Chiba, Japan; Department of General Medical Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba-city, Chiba, Japan; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Sakura, Chiba, Japan.
| | - Masahiro Inoue
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Eastern Chiba Medical Center, Togane, Chiba, Japan; Department of General Medical Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba-city, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Takahashi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Arata Nakajima
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Sakura, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masato Sonobe
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Sakura, Chiba, Japan
| | - Fumiaki Terajima
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Sakura, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takayuki Nakajima
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Eastern Chiba Medical Center, Togane, Chiba, Japan; Department of General Medical Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba-city, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yusuke Sato
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Eastern Chiba Medical Center, Togane, Chiba, Japan; Department of General Medical Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba-city, Chiba, Japan
| | - Go Kubota
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kubota Orthopaedic Clinic, Katori, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masashi Sato
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Eastern Chiba Medical Center, Togane, Chiba, Japan; Department of General Medical Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba-city, Chiba, Japan
| | - Satoshi Yoh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Eastern Chiba Medical Center, Togane, Chiba, Japan; Department of General Medical Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba-city, Chiba, Japan
| | - Shuhei Ohyama
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Eastern Chiba Medical Center, Togane, Chiba, Japan
| | - Junya Saito
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Sakura, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masaki Norimoto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Sakura, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yawara Eguchi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba-city, Chiba, Japan
| | - Sumihisa Orita
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba-city, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kazuhide Inage
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba-city, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Shiga
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba-city, Chiba, Japan
| | - Seiji Ohtori
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba-city, Chiba, Japan
| | - Koichi Nakagawa
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Sakura, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Relationship between lumbar lordosis, pelvic parameters, PI-LL mismatch and outcome after short fusion surgery for lumbar degenerative disease. Literature review, rational and presentation of public study protocol: RELApSE study (registry for evaluation of lumbar artrodesis sagittal alignEment). World Neurosurg X 2023; 18:100162. [PMID: 36818735 PMCID: PMC9932215 DOI: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2023.100162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Revised: 01/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Vertebral arthrodesis for degenerative pathology of the lumbar spine still remains burdened by clinical problems with significant negative results. The introduction of the sagittal balance assessment with the evaluation of the meaning of pelvic parameters and spinopelvic (PI-LL) mismatch offered new evaluation criteria for this widespread pathology, but there is a lack of consistent evidence on long-term outcome. Methods The authors performed an extensive systematic review of literature, with the aim to identify all potentially relevant studies about the role and usefulness of the restoration or the assessment of Sagittal balance in lumbar degenerative disease. They present the study protocol RELApSE (NCT05448092 ID) and discuss the rationale through a comprehensive literature review. Results From the 237 papers on this topic, a total of 176 articles were selected in this review. The analysis of these literature data shows sparse and variable evidence. There are no observations or guidelines about the value of lordosis restoration or PI-LL mismatch. Most of the works in the literature are retrospective, monocentric, based on small populations, and often address the topic evaluation partially. Conclusions The RELApSE study is based on the possibility of comparing a heterogeneous population by pathology and different surgical technical options on some homogeneous clinical and anatomic-radiological measures aiming to understanding the value that global lumbar and segmental lordosis, distribution of lordosis, pelvic tilt, and PI-LL mismatch may have on clinical outcome in lumbar degenerative pathology and on the occurrence of adjacent segment disease.
Collapse
|
9
|
Kieffer WKM, Don A, Field A, Robertson PA. Lordosis loss in degenerative spinal conditions. Spine Deform 2022; 10:1407-1414. [PMID: 35794423 DOI: 10.1007/s43390-022-00533-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To establish whether common degenerative lumbar spine conditions have a predictable sagittal profile and associated range of lordosis. The spinopelvic balance of a normal population and normal ranges are well described in the literature. There is also evidence that certain degenerative conditions can lead to a preponderance of loss of lordosis at specific spinal levels. There is limited literature on the range and magnitude of loss of lordosis for known degenerative lumbar spine pathologies. METHODS A retrospective analysis of prospectively obtained radiographs from a dual surgeon database was performed and imaging analysed for spinopelvic parameters. Degenerative conditions studied were; Lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (L3/4 and L4/5 analysed separately), L5/S1 degenerative disc disease, L5/S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis. Pelvic incidence, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, segmental and global lumbar lordosis, vertebral lordosis and lumbar vertical axis were measured. RESULTS The range of change in segmental lordosis was normally distributed for all studied degenerative spinal conditions except L5/S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis. L5/S1 degenerative disc disease affected younger adults (mean age 37), whilst degenerative spondylolisthesis at L3/4 and L4/5 affected older adults (mean ages 69.5 and 68.9 respectively). Removing an outlying high-grade L5/S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis made the data distribution approach a normal distribution. CONCLUSION Most degenerative spinal pathologies cause a normally distributed spectrum of deformity which should be addressed and corrected with a tailored, individualised surgical plan for each patient. Universal treatment recommendations should be interpreted with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Will K M Kieffer
- Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, Canada Avenue, Redhill, RH1 5RH, Surrey, UK.
| | - Angus Don
- Auckland City Hospital, 2 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand
| | - Antony Field
- Auckland City Hospital and Starship Hospital, 2 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand
| | - Peter A Robertson
- Auckland City Hospital, 2 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Robotics Reduces Radiation Exposure in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Fusion Compared With Navigation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2022; 47:1279-1286. [PMID: 35791068 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 04/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE To compare robotics and navigation for minimally invasive elective lumbar fusion in terms of radiation exposure and time demand. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Although various studies have been conducted to demonstrate the benefits of both navigation and robotics over fluoroscopy in terms of radiation exposure, literature is lacking in studies comparing robotics versus navigation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients who underwent elective one-level or two-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) by a single surgeon using navigation (Stryker SpineMask) or robotics (ExcelsiusGPS) were included (navigation 2017-2019, robotics 2019-2021, resulting in prospective cohorts of consecutive patients for each modality). All surgeries had the intraoperative computed tomography workflow. The two cohorts were compared for radiation exposure [fluoroscopy time and radiation dose: image capture, surgical procedure, and overall) and time demand (time for setup and image capture, operative time, and total operating room (OR) time]. RESULTS A total of 244 patients (robotics 111, navigation 133) were included. The two cohorts were similar in terms of baseline demographics, primary/revision surgeries, and fusion levels. For one-level TLIF, total fluoroscopy time, total radiation dose, and % of radiation for surgical procedure were significantly less with robotics compared with navigation (20 vs. 25 s, P <0.001; 38 vs. 42 mGy, P =0.05; 58% vs. 65%, P =0.021). Although time for setup and image capture was significantly less with robotics (22 vs. 25 min, P <0.001) and operative time was significantly greater with robotics (103 vs. 93 min, P <0.001), there was no significant difference in the total OR time (145 vs. 141 min, P =0.25). Similar findings were seen for two-level TLIF as well. CONCLUSION Robotics for minimally invasive TLIF, compared with navigation, leads to a significant reduction in radiation exposure both to the surgeon and patient, with no significant difference in the total OR time.
Collapse
|
11
|
Crawford CH, Epperson TN, Gum JL, Owens RK, Djurasovic M, Glassman SD, Carreon LY. Predictors of segmental lumbar lordosis following midline posterior (transforaminal) lumbar interbody fusion: Does interbody device type matter? NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY JOURNAL (NASSJ) 2022; 11:100145. [PMID: 35990008 PMCID: PMC9386101 DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2022.100145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Revised: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Background Controversy exists regarding the ability of posterior (transforaminal) lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF/TLIF) to achieve lordosis. We hypothesized that an interbody device (IBD) designed for positioning in the anterior disc space produces greater lordosis than IBDs designed for straight-in positioning. The purpose of this study is to determine if using either an anterior-position or straight-in position IBD design were associated with successful achievement of postoperative lordosis. Methods A consecutive series of patients undergoing a undergoing a single-level, posterior open midline (transforaminal) lumbar interbody fusion procedure for degenerative spine conditions during a time period when the two types of interbody devices were being used at surgeon discretion were identified from a multi-surgeon academic training center. Patient demographics and radiographic measures including surgical level lordosis (SLL), anterior disc height, middle disc height, posterior disc height, IBD height, and IBD insertion depth were measured on preop, immediate postop, and one-year postop standing radiographs using PACS. Group comparison and regression analysis were performed using SPSS. Results Sixty-one patients were included (n=37 anterior, n=34 straight-in). Mean age was 59.8±8.7 years, 32 (52%) were female. There was no difference between IBD type (anterior vs. straight-in) for mean Pre-op SLL (19±7° vs. 20±6°, p=0.7), Post-op SLL (21±5° vs 21±6°, p=0.5), or Change in SLL (2±4° vs. 1±5°, p=0.2). Regression analysis showed that Pre-op SLL was the only variable associated with Change in SLL (Beta = negative 0.48, p=0.000). While the mean Change in SLL could be considered clinically insignificant, there was wide variability: from a loss of 9° to a gain of 13°. Gain of lordosis >5° only occurred when Pre-op SLL was <21°, and loss of lordosis >5° only occurred when Pre-op SLL was >21°. Conclusions While group averages showed an insignificant change in segmental lordosis following a posterior (transforaminal) interbody fusion regardless of interbody device type, pre-operative lordosis was correlated with a clinically significant change in segmental lordosis. Preoperative hypolordotic discs were more likely to gain significant lordosis, while preoperative hyperlordotic discs were more likely to lose significant lordosis. Surgeon awareness of this tendency can help guide surgical planning and technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles H Crawford
- Norton Leatherman Spine Center, 210 East Gray Street, Suite 900, Louisville KY, 40202, United States
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, 550 S. Jackson St., 1st Floor ACB, Louisville, KY 40202, United States
| | - Thomas N Epperson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, 550 S. Jackson St., 1st Floor ACB, Louisville, KY 40202, United States
| | - Jeffrey L Gum
- Norton Leatherman Spine Center, 210 East Gray Street, Suite 900, Louisville KY, 40202, United States
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, 550 S. Jackson St., 1st Floor ACB, Louisville, KY 40202, United States
| | - R. Kirk Owens
- Norton Leatherman Spine Center, 210 East Gray Street, Suite 900, Louisville KY, 40202, United States
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, 550 S. Jackson St., 1st Floor ACB, Louisville, KY 40202, United States
| | - Mladen Djurasovic
- Norton Leatherman Spine Center, 210 East Gray Street, Suite 900, Louisville KY, 40202, United States
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, 550 S. Jackson St., 1st Floor ACB, Louisville, KY 40202, United States
| | - Steven D Glassman
- Norton Leatherman Spine Center, 210 East Gray Street, Suite 900, Louisville KY, 40202, United States
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, 550 S. Jackson St., 1st Floor ACB, Louisville, KY 40202, United States
| | - Leah Y Carreon
- Norton Leatherman Spine Center, 210 East Gray Street, Suite 900, Louisville KY, 40202, United States
- Corresponding author at: Norton Leatherman Spine Center, 210 E Gray Street, Suite 900, Louisville, KY 40202, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dibble CF, Zhang JK, Greenberg JK, Javeed S, Khalifeh JM, Jain D, Dorward I, Santiago P, Molina C, Pennicooke B, Ray WZ. Comparison of local and regional radiographic outcomes in minimally invasive and open TLIF: a propensity score-matched cohort. J Neurosurg Spine 2022; 37:384-394. [PMID: 35276656 DOI: 10.3171/2022.1.spine211254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Local and regional radiographic outcomes following minimally invasive (MI) transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus open TLIF remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to provide a comprehensive assessment of local and regional radiographic parameters following MI-TLIF and open TLIF. The authors hypothesized that open TLIF provides greater segmental and global lordosis correction than MI-TLIF. METHODS A single-center retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing MI- or open TLIF for grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis was performed. One-to-one nearest-neighbor propensity score matching (PSM) was used to match patients who underwent open TLIF to those who underwent MI-TLIF. Sagittal segmental radiographic measures included segmental lordosis (SL), anterior disc height (ADH), posterior disc height (PDH), foraminal height (FH), percent spondylolisthesis, and cage position. Lumbopelvic radiographic parameters included overall lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch, sacral slope (SS), and pelvic tilt (PT). Change in segmental or overall lordosis after surgery was considered "lordosing" if the change was > 0° and "kyphosing" if it was ≤ 0°. Student t-tests or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare outcomes between MI-TLIF and open-TLIF groups. RESULTS A total of 267 patients were included in the study, 114 (43%) who underwent MI-TLIF and 153 (57%) who underwent open TLIF, with an average follow-up of 56.6 weeks (SD 23.5 weeks). After PSM, there were 75 patients in each group. At the latest follow-up both MI- and open-TLIF patients experienced significant improvements in assessment scores obtained with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the numeric rating scale for low-back pain (NRS-BP), without significant differences between groups (p > 0.05). Both MI- and open-TLIF patients experienced significant improvements in SL, ADH, and percent corrected spondylolisthesis compared to baseline (p < 0.001). However, the MI-TLIF group experienced significantly larger magnitudes of correction with respect to these metrics (ΔSL 4.14° ± 4.35° vs 1.15° ± 3.88°, p < 0.001; ΔADH 4.25 ± 3.68 vs 1.41 ± 3.77 mm, p < 0.001; percent corrected spondylolisthesis: -10.82% ± 6.47% vs -5.87% ± 8.32%, p < 0.001). In the MI-TLIF group, LL improved in 44% (0.3° ± 8.5°) of the cases, compared to 48% (0.9° ± 6.4°) of the cases in the open-TLIF group (p > 0.05). Stratification by operative technique (unilateral vs bilateral facetectomy) and by interbody device (static vs expandable) did not yield statistically significant differences (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Both MI- and open-TLIF patients experienced significant improvements in patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures and local radiographic parameters, with neutral effects on regional alignment. Surprisingly, in our cohort, change in SL was significantly greater in MI-TLIF patients, perhaps reflecting the effect of operative techniques, technological innovations, and the preservation of the posterior tension band. Taking these results together, no significant overall differences in LL between groups were demonstrated, which suggests that MI-TLIF is comparable to open approaches in providing radiographic correction after surgery. These findings suggest that alignment targets can be achieved by either MI- or open-TLIF approaches, highlighting the importance of surgeon attention to these variables.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Jawad M Khalifeh
- 3Department of Neurological Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Deeptee Jain
- 2Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri; and
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kim SH, Hahn BS, Park JY. What Affects Segmental Lordosis of the Surgical Site after Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion? Yonsei Med J 2022; 63:665-674. [PMID: 35748078 PMCID: PMC9226838 DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2022.63.7.665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Revised: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study was undertaken to identify factors that affect segmental lordosis (SL) after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) by comparing patients whose postoperative SL increased with those whose decreased. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifty-five patients underwent MIS-TLIF at our institute from January 2018 to September 2019. Demographic, pre- and postoperative radiologic, and cage-related factors were included. Statistical analyses were designed to compare patients whose SL increased with decreased after surgery. RESULTS After surgery, SL increased in 34 patients (group I) and decreased in 21 patients (group D). The index level, disc lordosis, SL, lumbar lordosis, proximal lordosis (PL), and Y-axis position of the cage (Yc) differed significantly between groups I and D. The cage in group I was more anterior than that in group D (Yc: 55.84% vs. 51.24%). Multivariate analysis showed that SL decreased more significantly after MIS-TLIF when the index level was L3/4 rather than L4/5 [odds ratio (OR): 0.46, p=0.019], as preoperative SL (OR: 0.82, p=0.037) or PL (OR: 0.68, p=0.028) increased, and as the cage became more posterior (OR: 1.10, p=0.032). CONCLUSION Changes in SL after MIS-TLIF appear to be associated with preoperative SL and PL, index level, and Yc. An index level at L4/5 instead of L3/4, smaller preoperative SL or PL, and an anterior position of the cage are likely to result in increased SL after MIS-TLIF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soo-Heon Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea
| | - Bang Sang Hahn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Leon Wiltse Memorial Hospital, Suwon, Korea
| | - Jeong-Yoon Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Han B, Ding H, Hai Y, Liu Y, Guan L, Pan A, Zhang X, Yin P. May the midline lumbar interbody fusion (MIDLIF) prevent the early radiographic adjacent segment degeneration? A minimum 3-year follow-up comparative study of MIDLIF in L4/5 with cortical bone trajectory screw versus traditional pedicle screw fixation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23:480. [PMID: 35596180 PMCID: PMC9121621 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05363-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Study design Retrospective cohort study. Objective To compare the early radiographic adjacent segment degeneration (R-ASD) and regional lumbar sagittal alignment after midline lumbar interbody fusion (MIDLIF) with cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screw fixation (CBT-MIDLIF) and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with the traditional pedicle screw fixation (PS-PLIF) during long-term follow-up. Methods All patients who underwent CBT-MIDLIF or PS-PLIF were identified by a retrospective consecutive case review. Radiographic parameters in cephalad adjacent segment (L3/4), including intervertebral space height (ISH), foraminal height (FH), foraminal width (FW), range of motion were assessed. Lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), L4–L5 Cobb angle, Cobb angle of the intervertebral space at L4–L5, and height of the anterior and posterior edges of the intervertebral space at L4–L5, were measured and compared on preoperative, postoperative, and 3-year follow-up radiographic evaluation. Results Seventy-four patients underwent CBT-MIDLIF (CBT-MIDLIF group) and 114 patients underwent conventional PS-PLIF (PS-PLIF group). ISH, FH and FW were significantly smaller at 6-month follow-up than before operation with PS-PLIF (p < 0.001) but showed no significant changes with CBT-MIDLIF (p > 0.05). At the last follow-up, the changes in cephalad R-ASD parameters were more remarkable after PS-PLIF than after CBT-MIDLIF (p < 0.01). LL and SS were significant larger at the last follow-up than before operation in both groups (p < 0.001). Regarding long-term outcomes, the symptoms caused by degenerative spinal disorders significantly improved in both groups (p < 0.01). Conclusion CBT-MIDLIF had less radiographic degeneration in the adjacent segment than PS-PLIF at 3-year follow-up. The lumbar sagittal alignment could be improved significantly and the surgical outcomes were satisfactory after either CBT-MIDLIF or PS-PLIF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Han
- Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, GongTiNanLu 8#, Chao-Yang District, Beijing, 100020, China
| | - Hongtao Ding
- Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, GongTiNanLu 8#, Chao-Yang District, Beijing, 100020, China
| | - Yong Hai
- Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, GongTiNanLu 8#, Chao-Yang District, Beijing, 100020, China.
| | - Yuzeng Liu
- Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, GongTiNanLu 8#, Chao-Yang District, Beijing, 100020, China.
| | - Li Guan
- Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, GongTiNanLu 8#, Chao-Yang District, Beijing, 100020, China
| | - Aixing Pan
- Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, GongTiNanLu 8#, Chao-Yang District, Beijing, 100020, China
| | - Xinuo Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, GongTiNanLu 8#, Chao-Yang District, Beijing, 100020, China
| | - Peng Yin
- Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, GongTiNanLu 8#, Chao-Yang District, Beijing, 100020, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Leveque JCA, Drolet CE, Nemani V, Krause KL, Shen J, Rathore A, Baig Y, Louie PK. The Impact of Surgical Approach on Sagittal Plane Alignment in Patients Undergoing One- or Two- Level Fusions for Degenerative Pathology: A Multicenter Radiographic Evaluation 6 Months Following Surgery. World Neurosurg 2022; 164:e311-e317. [PMID: 35490888 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.04.093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2022] [Revised: 04/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Interbody fusion procedures, including transforaminal (TLIF), posterior (PLIF), anterior (ALIF), and lateral (LLIF), effectively treat lumbar degenerative pathology and provide spinopelvic balance. The objective of this study is to compare changes in spinopelvic parameters 6 months following 1-2 level TLIF, PLIF, ALIF, and LLIF. METHODS This retrospective study included 18 centers across the United States. Patients were included in the study if they underwent a 1- or 2-level primary lumbar fusion for degenerative pathology. Preoperative and 6-month postoperative lumbar anteroposterior and lateral lumbar plain radiograph measurements included: pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, lumbar lordosis from L1-S1, and segmental lordosis of each segment between L1 and S1. RESULTS A total of 474 patients met inclusion criteria, with 632 levels that underwent fusion. Of these, 181 patients underwent an ALIF/LLIF on 381 levels, and 188 underwent a TLIF/PLIF on 252 levels. ALIF/LLIF procedures resulted in significantly more segmental lordosis (P < 0.001) and global lumbar lordotic alignment change (P < 0.01) compared with TLIF/PLIF procedures. Whether patients' alignment was preserved versus worsened was not significantly predicted by type of procedure. Similarly, whether patients' alignment was restored versus not corrected was not significantly predicted by procedure. CONCLUSIONS In this large-scale multicenter study of lumbar fusion patients presenting with degenerative lumbar pathology, anteriorly placed grafts (ALIF/LLIF) led to a greater likelihood of patients being preserved rather than worsened in their spinopelvic mismatch. Posteriorly placed TLIF or PLIF grafts tended to worsen lordosis both segmentally and globally, yet even the anterior grafts only modestly improved those 2 same measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Christophe A Leveque
- Center for Neurosciences and Spine, Department of Neurosurgery, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Caroline E Drolet
- Center for Neurosciences and Spine, Department of Neurosurgery, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Venu Nemani
- Center for Neurosciences and Spine, Department of Neurosurgery, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Katie L Krause
- Center for Neurosciences and Spine, Department of Neurosurgery, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jesse Shen
- Center for Neurosciences and Spine, Department of Neurosurgery, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Alia Rathore
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Younus Baig
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Philip K Louie
- Center for Neurosciences and Spine, Department of Neurosurgery, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, Seattle, Washington, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Analysis of Risk Factors for Adjacent Segment Degeneration after Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion at Lumbosacral Spine. COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND NEUROSCIENCE 2022; 2022:4745534. [PMID: 35498212 PMCID: PMC9050292 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4745534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2022] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Background. Adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) has been considered as a serious complication from changes in the biological stress pattern after spinal fusion. The sagittal balance significantly associated with lumbar loading is largely dependent on L5-S1 segment. However, the evidence indicating risk factors for radiological and symptomatic ASD after minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) remains insufficient. Methods. This single-central retrospective study recruited patients with lumbosacral degeneration receiving MIS-TLIF at the L5-S1 level from January 2015 to December 2018. The targeted variables included demographic information, radiological indicators, surgery-related parameters, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) extracted from the electronic medical system by natural language processing. In these patients, a minimum of 3-year follow-up was done. After reviewing the preoperative and postoperative follow-up digital radiographs, patients were assigned to radiological ASD group (disc height narrowing ≥3 mm, progressive slipping ≥3 mm, angular motion >10°, and osteophyte formation >3 mm), symptomatic ASD group, and control group. We identified potential predictors for radiological and symptomatic ASD with the service of stepwise logistic regression analysis. Results. Among the 157 consecutive patients treated with MIS-TLIF in our department, 16 cases (10.2%) were diagnosed with radiological ASD at 3-year follow-up. The clinical evaluation did not reveal suspicious risk factors, but several significant differences were confirmed in radiological indicators. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed postoperative PI, postoperative DA, and ∆PI-LL in radiological ASD group were significantly different from those in control group. Nevertheless, for patients diagnosed with simultaneously radiological and symptomatic ASD, postoperative DA and postoperative PT as risk factors significantly affected the clinical outcome following MIS-TLIF. Conclusion. In this study, while approximately 10% of lumbosacral degenerations develop radiographic ASD, prognosis-related symptomatic ASD was shown not to be a frequent postoperative complication. Postoperative PI, postoperative DA, and mismatched PI-LL are risk factors for radiological ASD, and postoperative DA and postoperative PT are responsible for the occurrence of symptomatic ASD following MIS-TLIF. These radiological risk factors demonstrate that restoration of normal sagittal balance is an effective measure to optimize treatment strategies for secondary ASD prevention.
Collapse
|
17
|
[Prospective randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of low-dose and high-dose intravenous tranexamic acid in reducing perioperative blood loss in single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion]. ZHONGGUO XIU FU CHONG JIAN WAI KE ZA ZHI = ZHONGGUO XIUFU CHONGJIAN WAIKE ZAZHI = CHINESE JOURNAL OF REPARATIVE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY 2022; 36:439-445. [PMID: 35426283 PMCID: PMC9011080 DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202112015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted to study the effectiveness and safety of intravenous different doses tranexamic acid (TXA) in single-level unilateral minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). METHODS The patients treated with single-level unilateral MIS-TLIF between September 2019 and October 2020 were enrolled and randomly classified into low-dose TXA (LD) group (n=39), high-dose TXA (HD) group (n=39), and placebo-controlled (PC) group (n=38). The LD, HD, and PC groups received intravenous TXA 20 mg/kg, TXA 50 mg/kg, the same volume of normal saline at 30 minute before skin incision after general anesthesia, respectively. There was no significant difference on baseline characteristics and preoperative laboratory results among 3 groups (P>0.05), including age, gender, body mass index, surgical segments, hematocrit (HCT), hemoglobin (HGB), prothrombin time (PT), international normalized ratio (INR), D-dimer, fibrin degradation products (FDP), activated partial prothromboplastin time (APTT), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), creatinine (Cr), urea. The intraoperative blood loss (IBL), postoperative drainage volume, operation time, total blood loss (TBL), hidden blood loss (HBL), blood transfusion, hematological examination indexes on the first day after operation, and the incidence of complications within 1 month were compared among the 3 groups. RESULTS There were 3, 2, and 4 patients in the LD, HD, and PC groups who underwent autologous blood transfusion, respectively, and there was no allogeneic blood transfusion patients in the 3 groups. There was no significant difference in IBL, postoperative drainage volume, and operation time between groups (P>0.05). The TBL, HBL, and the decreased value of HGB in LD and HD groups were significantly lower than those in PC group (P<0.05), and TBL and HBL in HD group were significantly lower than those in LD group (P<0.05); the decreased value of HGB between LD group and HD group showed no significant difference (P>0.05). On the first day after operation, D-dimer in LD and HD groups were significantly lower than that in PC group (P<0.05); there was no significant difference between LD and HD groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in other hematological indexes between groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up 1 month, and there was no TXA-related complication such as deep venous thrombosis of lower extremity, pulmonary embolism, and epilepsy in the 3 groups. CONCLUSION Intravenous administration of TXA in single-level unilateral MIS-TLIF is effective and safe in reducing postoperative TBL and HBL within 1 day in a dose-dependent manner. Also, TXA can reduce postoperative fibrinolysis markers and do not increase the risk of thrombotic events, including deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.
Collapse
|
18
|
Morse KW, Alluri RK, Vaishnav AS, Urakawa H, Mok JK, Virk SS, Sheha ED, Qureshi SA. Do preoperative clinical and radiographic characteristics impact patient outcomes following one-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion based upon presenting symptoms? Spine J 2022; 22:570-577. [PMID: 34699995 PMCID: PMC9178522 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Revised: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) frequently present with lower extremity neurologic symptoms with or without associated lower back pain. While symptomatic improvement of leg and back pain has been reported, the resolution of back pain when it is a predominant presenting symptom remains underreported following MI-TLIF. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes at 1 year of patients undergoing MI-TLIF with lower extremity neurologic symptoms with and without a significant component of back pain. STUDY DESIGN A retrospective review of prospectively collected data from a single surgeon surgical database from 2017 to 2019 was performed. PATIENT SAMPLE Fifty one patients undergoing MI-TLIF. OUTCOME MEASURES Self-reported measures included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual analog scale back pain (VAS-back), and VAS leg pain (VAS-leg). METHODS Patients were divided into two groups: Leg Pain Predominant (patients reported greater than 50% leg pain upon presentation) and Back Pain Predominant (patients reported 50% or greater back pain). Multivariate analysis was performed to determine differences between groups based upon any significantly baseline characteristics. RESULTS Preoperative demographic and radiographic outcomes were similar between the two groups. Both groups demonstrated significant improvement in ODI, VAS-Back and VAS-leg at 1-year postoperatively. On multivariate analysis, there were differences in ODI at 1-year, 1-year back pain, and 1-year leg pain between groups with those who initially presented with leg pain having a lower ODI, VAS Back, and VAS leg. Patients who presented with predominantly leg pain were more likely to meet minimal clinically important difference (MCID) criteria for ODI and VAS-back compared to those with predominantly back pain. CONCLUSION Following MI-TLIF, patients with lower extremity neurologic symptoms with and without a significant component of back pain have improvements in back pain, leg pain, and ODI regardless of their primary presenting pain complaint; however, patients who presented with predominantly leg pain were more likely to meet MCID criteria for improvement in their back pain and ODI score.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle W. Morse
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Ram K. Alluri
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Avani S. Vaishnav
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Hikari Urakawa
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | | | - Sohrab S. Virk
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, North Shore Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY
| | - Evan D. Sheha
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Sheeraz A. Qureshi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.,Corresponding author: Sheeraz A. Qureshi, MD MBA, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA, Phone: 212-606-1585, Fax: 917-260-3185,
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ohyama S, Aoki Y, Inoue M, Nakajima T, Sato Y, Watanabe A, Takahashi H, Kubota G, Nakajima A, Saito J, Eguchi Y, Orita S, Nakagawa K, Ohtori S. Predictors of Spontaneous Restoration of Lumbar Lordosis after Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Diseases. Spine Surg Relat Res 2021; 5:397-404. [PMID: 34966866 PMCID: PMC8668222 DOI: 10.22603/ssrr.2020-0195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Preoperative factors that predict postoperative restoration of lumbar lordosis (LL) are not well understood. To investigate whether preoperative postural correction of LL, sagittal malalignment, or lumbar flexibility are associated with the postoperative restoration of LL in patients treated with a single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), a retrospective cohort study was conducted. Methods We enrolled 104 patients (mean age: 67.5±10.7 years old; 47 men and 57 women) with lumbar degenerative diseases treated with a single-level TLIF. The pre- and postoperative LL were examined using lateral radiographs in the standing position and computed tomography (CT) images in the supine position. The correlation between postoperative LL restoration and preoperative postural correction of LL (difference in LL between the standing and supine positions: D-LL), sagittal imbalance (pelvic incidence minus LL: PI-LL), and lumbar flexibility (difference in LL between the flexion and extension postures) were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the D-LL (D-LL≥0° and D-LL<0°). The rates of postoperative LL restoration (postoperative LL-preoperative LL in standing) were compared between the two groups. Results Multiple regression analysis performed after adjustment for age, gender, body mass index, and cage angle revealed that postoperative LL restoration was significantly correlated with D-LL (p<0.001), but not with PI-LL, and lumbar flexibility. Patients with a preoperative D-LL≥0° showed a significantly greater increase of LL after TLIF (7.1°±11.2°) than those with D-LL<0° (1.4°±6.6°) (p=0.003). Conclusions A preoperative evaluation of a lateral radiograph or CT taken in the supine position is useful in predicting postoperative improvement of sagittal alignment. Postoperative improvement of sagittal spinopelvic alignment would be expected when LL is corrected in the supine position preoperatively. Surgeons should pay attention to the postural correction of LL when performing short-segment fusion surgery for lumbar degenerative disease with sagittal malalignment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuhei Ohyama
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Eastern Chiba Medical Center, Togane, Japan
| | - Yasuchika Aoki
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Eastern Chiba Medical Center, Togane, Japan.,Department of General Medical Science, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masahiro Inoue
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Eastern Chiba Medical Center, Togane, Japan.,Department of General Medical Science, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takayuki Nakajima
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Eastern Chiba Medical Center, Togane, Japan.,Department of General Medical Science, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yusuke Sato
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Eastern Chiba Medical Center, Togane, Japan.,Department of General Medical Science, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Atsuya Watanabe
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Eastern Chiba Medical Center, Togane, Japan.,Department of General Medical Science, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Takahashi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Go Kubota
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sawara Prefectural Hospital, Katori, Japan
| | - Arata Nakajima
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Sakura, Japan
| | - Junya Saito
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Sakura, Japan
| | - Yawara Eguchi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Sumihisa Orita
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Koichi Nakagawa
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Sakura, Japan
| | - Seiji Ohtori
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Soliman MAR, Aguirre AO, Ruggiero N, Kuo CC, Mariotti BL, Khan A, Mullin JP, Pollina J. Comparison of prone transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spine disease: A retrospective radiographic propensity score-matched analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2021; 213:107105. [PMID: 34973651 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.107105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Revised: 12/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This is the first study to compare the prone transpsoas (PTP) approach for lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) through an analysis of radiographic and clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective chart review of data for patients who underwent the PTP approach or TLIF for degenerative lumbar spine disease was conducted. Propensity score matching was completed through the utilization of a linear regression model with the classification of surgery (PTP vs. TLIF) being used as the indicator (dependent variable) and the radiographic outcomes as covariates (independent variables). Both cohorts (PTP and TLIF) were propensity score matched according to preoperative radiographic parameters using a 1-to-1 ratio to the nearest neighbor. Eleven patients in the TLIF group were matched to an equal number of patients in the PTP group who had similar propensity scores to perform a thorough analysis of clinical and radiographic outcomes. RESULTS The PTP approach significantly improved the lumbar lordosis angle, pelvic tilt, and the pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis value when compared to TLIF (p < 0.05). Clinically, the PTP group improved significantly in terms of the Oswestry Disability Index (p < 0.05). That approach also significantly minimized blood loss and hospital stay (p < 0.05). Furthermore, significantly more cages were placed anteriorly in the PTP group than in the TLIF group (p < 0.05). However, the PTP group had a significantly longer duration of radiation exposure (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION The PTP approach resulted in greater improvement in postoperative radiographic measurements as well as patient-reported outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed A R Soliman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences at University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Buffalo General Medical Center, Kaleida Health, Buffalo, NY, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Alexander O Aguirre
- Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences at University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Nicco Ruggiero
- Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences at University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Cathleen C Kuo
- Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences at University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Brandon L Mariotti
- Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences at University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Asham Khan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences at University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Buffalo General Medical Center, Kaleida Health, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Jeffrey P Mullin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences at University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Buffalo General Medical Center, Kaleida Health, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - John Pollina
- Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences at University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Buffalo General Medical Center, Kaleida Health, Buffalo, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Toop N, Grossbach A, Gibbs D, Akhter A, Keister A, Maggio D, Oosten J, Deistler K, Gilkey T, Farhadi HF, Viljoen S. Static cage morphology in short-segment transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions is associated with alterations in foraminal height but not clinical outcomes. World Neurosurg 2021; 159:e389-e398. [PMID: 34954441 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.12.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Steerable "banana" cages have been posited to increase segmental lordosis in short-segment transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (TLIF). The same is not necessarily true for straight "bullet" cages. While increased lordosis is generally thought to be advantageous, a potential complication is decreased foraminal height. Here we evaluate for any association between cage type and change in foraminal height and clinical outcomes following short-segment TLIFs. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed consecutive one- and two-level TLIFs with bilateral facetectomies with minimum one-year clinical and radiographic follow-up. Two cohorts were based on cage morphology: steerable "banana" cage or straight "bullet" cage. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), radiographic measurements, and revision rates were compared. RESULTS 46 patients with 53 straight and 95 patients with 131 steerable cage levels were included. Steerable cages showed increased segmental lordosis (9.1 vs 13.5°, p<0.001) and decreased foraminal height (20.3 vs 18.5 mm, p<0.001) after surgery. Straight cages demonstrated similar segmental lordosis (8.7 vs 8.1°, p=0.30) and foraminal height (19.4 vs 20.0 mm, p=0.065). Both cohorts showed improved PROMs at last follow-up (p≤0.005). Sub-analysis comparing patients that had increased or decreased foraminal height revealed similarly improved PROMs between cohorts. Revision rates at one-year were similar between cohorts (4.3% for straight and 3.2% for steerable group, p=0.72). CONCLUSION Although the increased segmental lordosis afforded by placement of steerable cages may decrease foraminal height after short segment TLIF, clinical outcomes are not negatively affected by this association.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathaniel Toop
- Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Andrew Grossbach
- Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - David Gibbs
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - Asad Akhter
- Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Alexander Keister
- Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Dominic Maggio
- Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - James Oosten
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - Kyle Deistler
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - Ty Gilkey
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - H Francis Farhadi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
| | - Stephanus Viljoen
- Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Tally WC, Temple HT, Burkus JK. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion using a cellular allogeneic bone matrix in the treatment of symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disease and lumbar spinal instability. JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY 2021; 7:310-317. [PMID: 34734135 DOI: 10.21037/jss-21-28] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background Cellular allogeneic bone grafts are used as a biologic adjuvant in lumbar spinal fusions. The clinical use of a minimally invasive extreme lateral approach to the lumbar spine has been widely adopted; however, there are few clinical studies that have documented the clinical and radiographic outcomes associated with the use of cellular allografts as an adjunct to fusion in this advanced surgical approach. Methods A consecutive series of 67 patients (34 males and 33 females) with a mean age of 66.8 years (26-85 years) who underwent single- or multilevel lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with supplemental posterior segmental spinal fixation using a cellular allogeneic bone matrix as the only bone graft material was retrospectively reviewed by a single surgeon. Patients' preoperative and 3- and 12-month postoperative data were studied. All patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months. Standardized clinical outcome measures-36-Item Short Form Surgery (SF-36), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and visual analog scale (VAS) back and leg pain scores-were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes. An average of 2.25 levels was treated per patient (151 total levels). Fusion status was assessed by dynamic radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans. The statistical method used to identify the significance of the observed changes in clinical outcomes was the paired 2-sided t-tests. Significance was ascribed to P values <0.05. Results Fusion was achieved at 142 levels (142/151; 94%). Eight levels (8/151; 5.3%) showed partial fusions and one patient (single level) had no fusion. In the group of patients with fusions, the mean back and leg pain scores showed improvement from preoperative scores at both 3 and 12 months (P<0.001). Functional outcomes showed similar clinical success in both in SF-36 and ODI scores. Conclusions The use of a cellular allogeneic bone matrix provided osteoconductive and osteoinductive components for successful spine fusions and was associated with statistically significant improvement in SF-36, VAS, and ODI scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - H Thomas Temple
- University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Kiran C. Patel Allopathic School of Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Miami, FL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Russo AJ, Schopler SA, Stetzner KJ, Shirk T. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable articulating interbody spacers significantly improves radiographic outcomes compared to static interbody spacers. JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY 2021; 7:300-309. [PMID: 34734134 DOI: 10.21037/jss-20-630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Background The goal of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI TLIF) is to restore and maintain disc height and lordosis until arthrodesis occurs, while minimizing muscle disruption and improving recovery time. The purpose of this study was to compare the radiographic outcomes in patients treated with an articulating expandable spacer in MI TLIF to more traditional static spacers. Methods This was a multi-site, multi-surgeon, Institutional Review Board-exempt, retrospective clinical study from a prospectively collected database. It included 48 patients with a diagnosis of degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one level from L2 to S1 with or without Grade 1 spondylolisthesis who underwent MI TLIF using either an articulating expandable or static interbody spacer. Twenty-seven patients were in the banana-shaped articulating expandable interbody spacer (ALTERA®, Globus Medical, Inc., Audubon, PA, USA) group, while 21 patients were in the static interbody spacer group. Both groups had supplemental posterior pedicle screw and rod fixation. Radiographic records were assessed for disc height, neuroforaminal height, and lordosis at baseline, 3 and 6 months, and final follow-up. Results The articulating expandable spacer group displayed significantly greater improvement in anterior disc height from baseline compared to the static spacer group at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months, and final follow-up by averages of 2.6 mm (79%), 2.8 mm (92%), 3.4 mm (105%), and 3.8 mm (139%), respectively (P<0.05). Mean increases in posterior disc height were significantly greater in the expandable group compared to the static group by 1.2 mm (65%) and 1.7 mm (104%) at 6 months and final follow-up, respectively (P<0.05). Articulating expandable spacers produced significantly greater average improvement by 4.0 mm in neuroforaminal height from baseline to final follow-up compared to static spacers (P<0.05). Increases in intervertebral angle from baseline were significantly greater in the expandable group than in the static group at 3 and 6 months, and final follow-up by averages of 2.5°, 2.8°, and 3.1°, respectively (P<0.05). The articulating expandable spacer group resulted in significantly greater improvements in lumbar lordosis from baseline to 3 and 6 months than the static spacer group by 4.4° and 4.0°, respectively (P<0.05). Conclusions MI TLIF with articulating expandable interbody spacers provides significant restoration and maintenance of disc height, neuroforaminal height, and lordosis compared to static spacers in this comparative cohort. Long-term clinical outcomes are needed to correlate with these radiographic improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Torrey Shirk
- Musculoskeletal Education and Research Center, A Division of Globus Medical, Inc., Audubon, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Virk S, Vaishnav AS, Sheha E, Urakawa H, Sato K, Othman Y, Chaudhary C, Lee R, Cong GT, Chaudhary S, Qureshi SA. Combining Expandable Interbody Cage Technology With a Minimally Invasive Technique to Harvest Iliac Crest Autograft Bone to Optimize Fusion Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery. Clin Spine Surg 2021; 34:E522-E530. [PMID: 34224423 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective cohort review. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to determine the rate of fusion associated with an expandable cage and iliac crest bone graft in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA MI-TLIF is a commonly performed procedure, but challenges inherent in MI-TLIF technique can make achieving an interbody fusion difficult. METHODS A retrospective review was performed on consecutive patients treated with an MI-TLIF for degenerative lumbar pathology. Patients that completed patient-reported outcome measures and 1-year computed tomography (CT)-scans for fusion analysis were included. Fusion morphology was analyzed by evaluating CT scans for location of bridging trabecular bone in relation to the cage. Patients with bridging bone were considered fused. Preoperative and postoperative health-related quality of life scores were compared. A Kolmogrov-Smirnoff test was used to determine normality of health-related outcome scores. A Friedman 2-way analysis of variance by ranks with pairwise comparisons to determine statistical significance of differences between the date of a follow-up examination and preoperative examination was done. RESULTS Of 75 patients evaluated 23 patients were excluded due to loss to follow-up, adjacent segment degeneration, inability to obtain a CT scan, or reoperation for nonfusion related symptoms. Of 61 disk spaces that were included, 55 had bridging bone through the intervertebral cage, resulting in an overall fusion rate of 90.2%. There was a higher rate of fusion at L5-S1 as compared to L4-L5. There was mean improvement in patient-reported outcome measures for Oswestry Disability Index, Short Form-12 Physical Component Score, Visual Analog Scale Back/Leg pain, and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function. There were no complications associated with iliac crest bone graft harvesting. CONCLUSION Combining an expandable cage with iliac crest autograft bone harvested through a minimally invasive technique can allow for improved fusion rates without graft-site complications in MI-TLIF surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Evan Sheha
- Hospital for Special Surgery
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- Hospital for Special Surgery
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Porche K, Dru A, Moor R, Kubilis P, Vaziri S, Hoh DJ. Preoperative Radiographic Prediction Tool for Early Postoperative Segmental and Lumbar Lordosis Alignment After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Cureus 2021; 13:e18175. [PMID: 34703700 PMCID: PMC8530555 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.18175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a common approach and results in varying degrees of lordosis correction. The purpose of this study is to determine preoperative radiographic spinopelvic parameters that predict change in postoperative segmental and lumbar lordosis after TLIF. Materials & Methods This study is a single surgeon retrospective review of one-level and two-level TLIFs from L3-S1. All patients underwent bilateral facetectomies, 10 mm TLIF cage (non-lordotic) insertions, and bilateral pedicle screw-rod construct placements. Pre- and post-operative X-rays were assessed for preoperative segmental lordosis (SL), lumbar lordosis (LL), and pelvic incidence (PI). Univariate and multi-predictor linear regression analyses were performed to determine the relationships between preoperative radiographic findings and change in early postoperative segmental and lumbar lordosis. Results Ninety-seven patients contributing 128 intervertebral segments were examined. The mean change in SL after TLIF was 7.3 (range: 0.10-28.9°, SD 6.39°). The mean change in LL after TLIF was 5.5˚ (range: -14.8-39.2°, standard deviation (SD) 7.16°). Greater preoperative LL predicted less postoperative LL correction, while greater preoperative PI predicted more postoperative SL and LL correction. Greater anterior disk height was noted to be associated with a decreased change in SL (∆SL). An annular tear on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) predicted a 2.7° decrease in ∆SL. A Schmorl's node on preoperative MRI predicted a 4.0° decrease in change in LL (∆LL). Conclusions A greater preoperative lordosis and a lower spinopelvic mismatch lessen the potential for an increase in the postoperative SL and LL after a TLIF, which is likely due to a ‘ceiling’ effect of an otherwise optimized spinal alignment. A greater anterior disk height and the presence of an annular tear are associated with decreased ∆SL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ken Porche
- Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - Alexander Dru
- Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - Rachel Moor
- Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - Paul Kubilis
- Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - Sasha Vaziri
- Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - Daniel J Hoh
- Neurosurgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Zhang QY, Tan J, Huang K, Xie HQ. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021; 22:802. [PMID: 34537023 PMCID: PMC8449429 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04687-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) and oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) are widely used in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases. In the present study, a meta-analysis was conducted to compare the clinical and radiographic efficacy of these two procedures. METHODS A systematic literature review was performed, and the quality of retrieved studies was evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Clinical outcomes, including operation time, intraoperative blood loss, improvement in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) effectiveness rate and complications, in addition to radiographic outcomes, including restoration of disc height, disc angle, overall lumbar lordosis, fusion rate and subsidence, were extracted and input into a fixed or random effect model to compare the efficacy of MIS-TLIF and OLIF. RESULTS Seven qualified studies were included. Clinically, OLIF resulted in less intraoperative blood loss and shorter operation time than MIS-TLIF. Improvement of VAS for leg pain was more obvious in the OLIF group (P < 0.0001), whereas improvement of VAS for back pain (P = 0.08) and ODI (P = 0.98) as well as JOABPEQ effectiveness rate (P = 0.18) were similar in the two groups. Radiographically, OLIF was more effective in restoring disc height (P = 0.01) and equivalent in improving the disc angle (P = 0.18) and lumbar lordosis (P = 0.48) compared with MIS-TLIF. The fusion rate (P = 0.11) was similar in both groups, while the subsidence was more severe in the MIS-TLIF group (P < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS The above evidence suggests that OLIF is associated with a shorter operation time (with supplementary fixation in the prone position) and less intraoperative blood loss than MIS-TLIF and can lead to better leg pain alleviation, disc height restoration and subsidence resistance. No differences regarding back pain relief, functional recovery, complications, disc angle restoration, lumbar lordosis restoration and fusion rate were found. However, due to the limited number of studies, our results should be confirmed with high-level studies to fully compare the therapeutic efficacy of MIS-TLIF and OLIF. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO ID: CRD42020201903 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qing-Yi Zhang
- Laboratory of Stem Cell and Tissue Engineering, Orthopaedic Research Institute, Department of Orthopaedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Keyuan fourth Road, Gaopeng Avenue, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China
| | - Jie Tan
- Laboratory of Stem Cell and Tissue Engineering, Orthopaedic Research Institute, Department of Orthopaedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Keyuan fourth Road, Gaopeng Avenue, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China
| | - Kai Huang
- Laboratory of Stem Cell and Tissue Engineering, Orthopaedic Research Institute, Department of Orthopaedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Keyuan fourth Road, Gaopeng Avenue, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China
| | - Hui-Qi Xie
- Laboratory of Stem Cell and Tissue Engineering, Orthopaedic Research Institute, Department of Orthopaedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Keyuan fourth Road, Gaopeng Avenue, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Phani Kiran S, Sudhir G. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion - A narrative review on the present status. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2021; 22:101592. [PMID: 34603954 PMCID: PMC8463772 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2021] [Revised: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Minimally invasive lumbar transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) has become the most commonly performed lumbar fusion procedure. There are multiple variables such as bone graft properties, use of rhBMP (recombinant human bone morphogenic protein), interbody cage properties, image guidance techniques, etc., that may impact the outcomes and fusion rates. Radiation exposure to the patient as well as to the operating team is an important concern. The minimally invasive anterior approaches for lumbar fusion with ability to insert larger cages and achieve better sagittal correction have added another option in management of lumbar degenerative deformities. A literature review of recent studies and systematic reviews on different aspects impacting the outcomes of MIS TLIF has been done to define the present status of the procedure in this narrative review. Iliac crest bone graft can help achieve very good fusion rate without significantly increasing the morbidity. RhBMP is most potent enhancer of fusion and the adverse effects can be avoided by surgical technique and using lower dose. The use of navigation techniques has reduced the radiation exposure to patient and the surgeons but the benefit seems to be significant only in long segment fusions.
Collapse
Key Words
- ALIF, Anterior lumbar interbody fusion
- Bone graft substitutes
- DBM, Demineralised Bone Matrix
- JOABPEQ, Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire
- LLIF, Lateral lumbar interbody fusion
- MIISA, Minimally Invasive Interbody Selection Algorithm
- MIS TLIF
- MIS TLIF, Minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion
- Minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion
- Navigation assisted lumbar fusion
- OLIF, Oblique lumbar interbody fusion
- SiCaP, Silicate-substituted Calcium Phosphate
- Transforaminal interbody fusion
- XLIF, Extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion
- rhBMP, recombinant human bone morphogenic protein
- β-TCP, β-Tricalcium Phosphate
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Phani Kiran
- Gleneagles Global Health City, Chennai, India,Corresponding author. Gleneagles Global Health City, 439 Cheran Nagar, Perumbakkam, Chennai, 600100, Tamilnadu, India.
| | - G. Sudhir
- Department of Spine Surgery, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lovecchio FC, Vaishnav AS, Steinhaus ME, Othman YA, Gang CH, Iyer S, McAnany SJ, Albert TJ, Qureshi SA. Does interbody cage lordosis impact actual segmental lordosis achieved in minimally invasive lumbar spine fusion? Neurosurg Focus 2021; 49:E17. [PMID: 32871566 DOI: 10.3171/2020.6.focus20393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In an effort to prevent loss of segmental lordosis (SL) with minimally invasive interbody fusions, manufacturers have increased the amount of lordosis that is built into interbody cages. However, the relationship between cage lordotic angle and actual SL achieved intraoperatively remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine if the lordotic angle manufactured into an interbody cage impacts the change in SL during minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) done for degenerative pathology. METHODS The authors performed a retrospective review of a single-surgeon database of adult patients who underwent primary LIF between April 2017 and December 2018. Procedures were performed for 1-2-level lumbar degenerative disease using contemporary MIS techniques, including transforaminal LIF (TLIF), lateral LIF (LLIF), and anterior LIF (ALIF). Surgical levels were classified on lateral radiographs based on the cage lordotic angle (6°-8°, 10°-12°, and 15°-20°) and the position of the cage in the disc space (anterior vs posterior). Change in SL was the primary outcome of interest. Subgroup analyses of the cage lordotic angle within each surgical approach were also conducted. RESULTS A total of 116 surgical levels in 98 patients were included. Surgical approaches included TLIF (56.1%), LLIF (32.7%), and ALIF (11.2%). There were no differences in SL gained by cage lordotic angle (2.7° SL gain with 6°-8° cages, 1.6° with 10°-12° cages, and 3.4° with 15°-20° cages, p = 0.581). Subgroup analysis of LLIF showed increased SL with 15° cages only (p = 0.002). The change in SL was highest after ALIF (average increase 9.8° in SL vs 1.8° in TLIF vs 1.8° in LLIF, p < 0.001). Anterior position of the cage in the disc space was also associated with a significantly greater gain in SL (4.2° vs -0.3°, p = 0.001), and was the only factor independently correlated with SL gain (p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS Compared with cage lordotic angle, cage position and approach play larger roles in the generation of SL in 1-2-level MIS for lumbar degenerative disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Sravisht Iyer
- 1Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.,3Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Steven J McAnany
- 1Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.,3Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Todd J Albert
- 1Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.,3Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- 1Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.,3Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Walter C, Baumgärtner T, Trappe D, Frantz S, Exner L, Mederake M. Influence of Cage Design on Radiological and Clinical Outcomes in Dorsal Lumbar Spinal Fusions: A Comparison of Lordotic and Non-Lordotic Cages. Orthop Surg 2021; 13:863-875. [PMID: 33763988 PMCID: PMC8126915 DOI: 10.1111/os.12872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2020] [Revised: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate the comparison between lordotic and non‐lordotic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) cages in degenerative lumbar spine surgery and analyze radiological as well as clinical outcome parameters in long‐term follow up. Methods In a retrospective study design, we compared 37 patients with non‐lordotic cage (NL‐group) and 40 with a 5° lordotic cage (L‐group) implanted mono‐ or bi‐segmental in TLIF‐technique from 2013 to 2016 and analyzed radiological parameters of pre‐ and postoperative (Lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental lordosis (SL), and pelvic tilt (PT), as well as clinical parameters in a follow‐up physical examination using the Oswestry disability index (ODI), Roland–Morris Score (RMS), and visual analog scale (VAS). Results Surgery was mainly performed in lower lumbar spine with a peak in L4/5 (mono‐segmental) and L4 to S1 (bi‐segmental), long‐term follow‐up was on average 4 years postoperative. According to the literature, we found significantly better results in radiological outcome in the L‐group compared to the NL‐group: LL increased 6° in L‐group (51° preoperative to 57° postoperative) and decreased 1° in NL‐group (50° to 49° (P < 0.001). Regarding SL, we found an increase of 5° in L‐group (13° to 18°) and no difference in NL‐group (15°)(P < 0.001). In PT, we found a clear benefit with a decrease of 2° in L‐group (21° to 19°) and no difference in NL‐group (P = 0.008). In direct group comparison, ODI in NL‐group was 23% vs 28% in L‐group (P = 0.25), RMS in NL‐group was 8 points vs 9 points in L‐group (P = 0.48), and VAS was in NL‐group 2.7 vs 3.2 in L‐group (P = 0.27) without significant differences. However, the clinical outcome in multivariate analysis indicated a significant multivariate influence across ODI and RMS of BMI (Wilks λ = 0.57, F [4, 44] = 3.61, P = 0.012) and preoperative SS (Wilks λ = 0.66, F [4, 44] = 2.54, P = 0.048). Age, gender, cage type and postoperative PT had no significant influence (P > 0.05). Intraoperatively, we saw three dura injuries that could be sutured without problems and had no consequences for the patient. In the follow‐up, we did not find any material‐related problems, such as broken screws or cage loosening, also no pseudarthrosis. Conclusion In conclusion, we think it's not cage design but other influenceable factors such as correct indication and adequate decompression that lead to surgical success and the minimal difference in the LL therefore seemed to be of subordinate importance.
Collapse
|
30
|
Mummaneni PV, Hussain I, Shaffrey CI, Eastlack RK, Mundis GM, Uribe JS, Fessler RG, Park P, Robinson L, Rivera J, Chou D, Kanter AS, Okonkwo DO, Nunley PD, Wang MY, Marca FL, Than KD, Fu KM. The minimally invasive interbody selection algorithm for spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Spine 2021:1-8. [PMID: 33711811 DOI: 10.3171/2020.9.spine20230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for spinal deformity uses interbody techniques for correction, indirect decompression, and arthrodesis. Selection criteria for choosing a particular interbody approach are lacking. The authors created the minimally invasive interbody selection algorithm (MIISA) to provide a framework for rational decision-making in MIS for deformity. METHODS A retrospective data set of circumferential MIS (cMIS) for adult spinal deformity (ASD) collected over a 5-year period was analyzed by level in the lumbar spine to identify surgeon preferences and evaluate segmental lordosis outcomes. These data were used to inform a Delphi session of minimally invasive deformity surgeons from which the algorithm was created. The algorithm leads to 1 of 4 interbody approaches: anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), anterior column release (ACR), lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Preoperative and 2-year postoperative radiographic parameters and clinical outcomes were compared. RESULTS Eleven surgeons completed 100 cMISs for ASD with 338 interbody devices, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. The type of interbody approach used at each level from L1 to S1 was recorded. The MIISA was then created with substantial agreement. The surgeons generally preferred LLIF for L1-2 (91.7%), L2-3 (85.2%), and L3-4 (80.7%). ACR was most commonly performed at L3-4 (8.4%) and L2-3 (6.2%). At L4-5, LLIF (69.5%), TLIF (15.9%), and ALIF (9.8%) were most commonly utilized. TLIF and ALIF were the most selected approaches at L5-S1 (61.4% and 38.6%, respectively). Segmental lordosis at each level varied based on the approach, with greater increases reported using ALIF, especially at L4-5 (9.2°) and L5-S1 (5.3°). A substantial increase in lordosis was achieved with ACR at L2-3 (10.9°) and L3-4 (10.4°). Lateral interbody arthrodesis without the use of an ACR did not generally result in significant lordosis restoration. There were statistically significant improvements in lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence-LL mismatch, coronal Cobb angle, and Oswestry Disability Index at the 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS The use of the MIISA provides consistent guidance for surgeons who plan to perform MIS for deformity. For L1-4, the surgeons preferred lateral approaches to TLIF and reserved ACR for patients who needed the greatest increase in segmental lordosis. For L4-5, the surgeons' order of preference was LLIF, TLIF, and ALIF, but TLIF failed to demonstrate any significant lordosis restoration. At L5-S1, the surgical team typically preferred an ALIF when segmental lordosis was desired and preferred a TLIF if preoperative segmental lordosis was adequate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Praveen V Mummaneni
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Ibrahim Hussain
- 2Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Christopher I Shaffrey
- 3Departments of Neurological Surgery and Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Robert K Eastlack
- 4Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic Torrey Pines, La Jolla, California
| | - Gregory M Mundis
- 4Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic Torrey Pines, La Jolla, California
| | - Juan S Uribe
- 5Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | - Paul Park
- 7Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | | | - Dean Chou
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Adam S Kanter
- 10Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - David O Okonkwo
- 10Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Pierce D Nunley
- 11Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Spine Institute of Louisiana, Shreveport, Louisiana
| | - Michael Y Wang
- 2Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Frank La Marca
- 12Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan; and
| | - Khoi D Than
- 3Departments of Neurological Surgery and Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kai-Ming Fu
- 13Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Chang CC, Chou D, Pennicooke B, Rivera J, Tan LA, Berven S, Mummaneni PV. Long-term radiographic outcomes of expandable versus static cages in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 2020:1-10. [PMID: 33186902 DOI: 10.3171/2020.6.spine191378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2019] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Potential advantages of using expandable versus static cages during transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) are not fully established. The authors aimed to compare the long-term radiographic outcomes of expandable versus static TLIF cages. METHODS A retrospective review of 1- and 2-level TLIFs over a 10-year period with expandable and static cages was performed at the University of California, San Francisco. Patients with posterior column osteotomy (PCO) were subdivided. Fusion assessment, cage subsidence, anterior and posterior disc height, foraminal dimensions, pelvic incidence (PI), segmental lordosis (SL), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were assessed. RESULTS A consecutive series of 178 patients (with a total of 210 levels) who underwent TLIF using either static (148 levels) or expandable cages (62 levels) was reviewed. The mean patient age was 60.3 ± 11.5 years and 62.8 ± 14.1 years for the static and expandable cage groups, respectively. The mean follow-up was 42.9 ± 29.4 months for the static cage group and 27.6 ± 14.1 months for the expandable cage group. Within the 1-level TLIF group, the SL and PI-LL improved with statistical significance regardless of whether PCO was performed; however, the static group with PCOs also had statistically significant improvement in LL and SVA. The expandable cage with PCO subgroup had significant improvement in SL only. All of the foraminal parameters improved with statistical significance, regardless of the type of cages used; however, the expandable cage group had greater improvement in disc height restoration. The incidence of cage subsidence was higher in the expandable group (19.7% vs 5.4%, p = 0.0017). Within the expandable group, the unilateral facetectomy-only subgroup had a 5.6 times higher subsidence rate than the PCO subgroup (26.8% vs 4.8%, p = 0.04). Four expandable cages collapsed over time. CONCLUSIONS Expandable TLIF cages may initially restore disc height better than static cages, but they also have higher rates of subsidence. Unilateral facetectomy alone may result in more subsidence with expandable cages than using bilateral PCO, potentially because of insufficient facet release. Although expandable cages may have more power to induce lordosis and restore disc height than static cages, subsidence and endplate violation may negate any significant gains compared to static cages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chih-Chang Chang
- Departments of1Neurosurgery and.,3Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,5School of Medicine and.,6Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | | | - Joshua Rivera
- 4University of California, San Francisco, California; and
| | | | - Sigurd Berven
- 2Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Khalifeh JM, Dibble CF, Stecher P, Dorward I, Hawasli AH, Ray WZ. Transfacet Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With an Expandable Interbody Device-Part II: Consecutive Case Series. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2020; 19:518-529. [PMID: 32433773 DOI: 10.1093/ons/opaa144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2019] [Accepted: 03/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in operative techniques and instrumentation technology have evolved to maximize patient outcomes following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). The transfacet MIS-TLIF is a modified approach to the standard MIS-TLIF that leverages a bony working corridor to access the disc space for discectomy and interbody device placement. OBJECTIVE To evaluate clinical and radiographic results following transfacet MIS-TLIF using an expandable interbody device. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent transfacet MIS-TLIF for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Patient-reported outcome measures for pain and disability were assessed. Sagittal lumbar segmental parameters and regional lumbopelvic parameters were assessed on upright lateral radiographs obtained preoperatively and during follow-up. RESULTS A total of 68 patients (61.8% male) underwent transfacet MIS-TLIF at 74 levels. The mean age was 63.4 yr and the mean follow-up 15.2 mo. Patients experienced significant short- and long-term postoperative improvements on the numeric rating scale for low back pain (-2.3/10) and Oswestry Disability Index (-12.0/50). Transfacet MIS-TLIF was associated with an immediate and sustained reduction of spondylolisthesis, and an increase in index-level disc height (+0.71 cm), foraminal height (+0.28 cm), and segmental lordosis (+6.83°). Patients with preoperative hypolordosis (<40°) experienced significant increases in segmental (+9.10°) and overall lumbar lordosis (+8.65°). Pelvic parameters were not significantly changed, regardless of preoperative alignment. Device subsidence was observed in 6/74 (8.1%) levels, and fusion in 50/53 (94.3%) levels after 12 mo. CONCLUSION Transfacet MIS-TLIF was associated with clinical improvements and restoration of radiographic sagittal segmental parameters. Regional alignment correction was observed among patients with hypolordosis at baseline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jawad M Khalifeh
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Christopher F Dibble
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Priscilla Stecher
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Ian Dorward
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Ammar H Hawasli
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Wilson Z Ray
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Li J, Zhang D, Shen Y, Qi X. Lumbar degenerative disease after oblique lateral interbody fusion: sagittal spinopelvic alignment and its impact on low back pain. J Orthop Surg Res 2020; 15:326. [PMID: 32795374 PMCID: PMC7427743 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-01837-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We determined the incidence and risk factors of low back pain (LBP) in patients with lumbar degenerative disease after single-level oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF). Methods We retrospectively reviewed 120 lumbar degenerative disease patients who underwent single-level OLIF. We compared preoperative and postoperative radiographic parameters, including segmental lordosis (SL), lumbar lordosis (LL), disk height (DH), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), thoracic kyphosis (TK), and C7-sagittal vertical axis (SVA). Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain. All patients were followed up for at least 2 years. Results Thirty-eight patients had postoperative LBP (VAS score for back pain ≥3; LBP group); the remaining 82 patients were in the non-LBP group. Age (P = 0.082), gender (P = 0.425), body mass index (P = 0.138), diagnosis (degenerative spondylolisthesis vs. lumbar spinal stenosis; P = 0.529), surgical level (P = 0.651), blood loss (P = 0.889), and operative time (P = 0.731) did not differ between the groups. In both groups, the ODI and VAS scores for back pain and leg pain significantly improved at the final follow-up compared with the preoperative scores (P = 0.003). Except for the VAS score for back pain (P = 0.000), none of the scores significantly differed between the two groups at the final follow-up (P > 0.05). In the non-LBP group, LL, SL, DH, TK, and SS significantly improved, while PT and C7-SVA significantly decreased at the final follow-up as compared with the preoperative values. In both groups, DH significantly improved postoperatively, with no significant between-group difference (P = 0.325). At the final follow-up, LL, PI-LL mismatch, PT, and C7-SVA showed significantly greater improvement in the non-LBP group than in the LBP group (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis identified PT, PI-LL mismatch, and C7-SVA as significant risk factors for LBP after OLIF. Conclusion OLIF for single-level lumbar degenerative disease had satisfactory clinical outcomes. PT, PI-LL mismatch, and C7-SVA were significant risk factors for postoperative LBP. Patients with appropriately decreased PT, improved C7-SVA, and PI-LL match experienced less LBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia Li
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050051, People's Republic of China.,The Key Laboratory of Orthopedic Biomechanics of Hebei Province, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050051, People's Republic of China
| | - Di Zhang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050051, People's Republic of China.,The Key Laboratory of Orthopedic Biomechanics of Hebei Province, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050051, People's Republic of China
| | - Yong Shen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050051, People's Republic of China.,The Key Laboratory of Orthopedic Biomechanics of Hebei Province, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050051, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiangbei Qi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050051, People's Republic of China. .,The Key Laboratory of Orthopedic Biomechanics of Hebei Province, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050051, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|