1
|
Crook S, Dragan K, Woo JL, Neidell M, Nash KA, Jiang P, Zhang Y, Sanchez CM, Cook S, Hannan EL, Newburger JW, Jacobs ML, Petit CJ, Goldstone A, Vincent R, Walsh-Spoonhower K, Mosca R, Kumar TKS, Devejian N, Biddix B, Alfieris GM, Swartz MF, Meyer D, Paul EA, Billings J, Anderson BR. Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Predictive Models for Outcomes After Congenital Heart Surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2024; 83:2440-2454. [PMID: 38866447 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.03.430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite documented associations between social determinants of health and outcomes post-congenital heart surgery, clinical risk models typically exclude these factors. OBJECTIVES The study sought to characterize associations between social determinants and operative and longitudinal mortality as well as assess impacts on risk model performance. METHODS Demographic and clinical data were obtained for all congenital heart surgeries (2006-2021) from locally held Congenital Heart Surgery Collaborative for Longitudinal Outcomes and Utilization of Resources Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database data. Neighborhood-level American Community Survey and composite sociodemographic measures were linked by zip code. Model prediction, discrimination, and impact on quality assessment were assessed before and after inclusion of social determinants in models based on the 2020 Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database Mortality Risk Model. RESULTS Of 14,173 total index operations across New York State, 12,321 cases, representing 10,271 patients at 8 centers, had zip codes for linkage. A total of 327 (2.7%) patients died in the hospital or before 30 days, and 314 children died by December 31, 2021 (total n = 641; 6.2%). Multiple measures of social determinants of health explained as much or more variability in operative and longitudinal mortality than clinical comorbidities or prior cardiac surgery. Inclusion of social determinants minimally improved models' predictive performance (operative: 0.834-0.844; longitudinal 0.808-0.811), but significantly improved model discrimination; 10.0% more survivors and 4.8% more mortalities were appropriately risk classified with inclusion. Wide variation in reclassification was observed by site, resulting in changes in the center performance classification category for 2 of 8 centers. CONCLUSIONS Although indiscriminate inclusion of social determinants in clinical risk modeling can conceal inequities, thoughtful consideration can help centers understand their performance across populations and guide efforts to improve health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Crook
- Center for Child Health Services Research, Mindich Child Health and Development Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA; Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA; Division of Pediatric Cardiology; Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kacie Dragan
- New York University, Wagner Graduate School of Public Service, New York, New York, USA; Interfaculty Initiative in Health Policy, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Joyce L Woo
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Matthew Neidell
- Department of Health Policy and Management; Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Katherine A Nash
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care and Hospital Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
| | - Pengfei Jiang
- Center for Child Health Services Research, Mindich Child Health and Development Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA; Division of Pediatric Cardiology; Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Yun Zhang
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology; Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
| | - Chantal M Sanchez
- Center for Child Health Services Research, Mindich Child Health and Development Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA; Division of Pediatric Cardiology; Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
| | - Stephen Cook
- Department of Pediatrics, Internal Medicine, and Center for Community Health, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA; New York State Department of Health; Offices of Health Insurance Programs, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Edward L Hannan
- University at Albany School of Public Health, Rensselaer, New York, USA
| | - Jane W Newburger
- Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Marshall L Jacobs
- Division of Cardiac Surgery; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Christopher J Petit
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology; Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
| | - Andrew Goldstone
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center & Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Robert Vincent
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, New York, USA
| | | | - Ralph Mosca
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, New York University, New York, New York, USA
| | - T K Susheel Kumar
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, New York University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Neil Devejian
- Division of Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Ben Biddix
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| | - George M Alfieris
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA; Department of Surgery, State University of New York Upstate Medical Center, Syracuse, New York, USA
| | - Michael F Swartz
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - David Meyer
- Departments of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Pediatrics, Hofstra-Northwell School of Medicine, Uniondale, New York, USA
| | - Erin A Paul
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - John Billings
- New York University, Wagner Graduate School of Public Service, New York, New York, USA
| | - Brett R Anderson
- Center for Child Health Services Research, Mindich Child Health and Development Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA; Division of Pediatric Cardiology; Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA; Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hao S, Quinn AW, Iasiello JA, Lea CS, Popowicz P, Fu Y, Irish W, Parikh AA, Snyder RA. Correlation of Patient-Reported Social Determinants of Health With Census Tract Measures of Socioeconomic Disadvantage in Patients With GI Cancers in Eastern North Carolina. JCO Oncol Pract 2024:OP2300703. [PMID: 38759124 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Investigating the impact of social determinants of health (SDOHs) on cancer care in large populations relies on census estimates. Routine clinic SDOH screening provides timely patient-level information which could inform best practices. This study evaluated the correlation between patient-reported SDOH needs and population-level census tract measures. METHODS This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of a cohort of adult patients with GI malignancy screened for SDOHs such as financial insecurity, transportation, and food insecurity during initial outpatient evaluation at East Carolina University (formerly Vidant) Health Medical Center in Greenville, NC (November 2020-July 2021). Primary outcomes included number and severity of identified SDOH needs and area deprivation index (ADI) and census tract measures for each patient. Spearman rank correlations were calculated among patient-level needs and between patient-level needs and similar census tract measures. RESULTS Of 112 patients screened, 58.9% self-identified as White (n = 66) and 41.1% as Black (n = 46). A total of 50.5% (n = 54) resided in a rural county. The collective median state ADI rank was 7 (IQR, 5-9). The median household income was $38,125 in US dollars (USD) (IQR, $31,436-$48,934 [USD]). Only 12.5% (n = 14) reported a moderate or severe financial need. Among reported needs, financial need moderately correlated with food insecurity (coefficient, 0.46; P < .001) and transportation (coefficient, 0.45; P < .001). Overall, census tract measures and reported needs poorly correlated. Lack of transportation correlated with percentage of households without a vehicle (coefficient, 0.18; P = .03) and limited access to healthy foods (coefficient, 0.18; P = .04). CONCLUSION Given the poor correlation between reported and census needs, population-level measures may not accurately predict patient-reported needs. These findings highlight the importance of SDOH screening in the clinical setting to reduce health disparities and identify opportunities to improve care delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scarlett Hao
- Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
| | - Ashley W Quinn
- Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
| | - John A Iasiello
- Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
| | - C Suzanne Lea
- Department of Public Health, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
| | - Patrycja Popowicz
- Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
| | - Yuanyuan Fu
- Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
| | - William Irish
- Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
- Department of Public Health, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
| | - Alexander A Parikh
- Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
| | - Rebecca A Snyder
- Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
- Division of Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Madrigal JM, Flory A, Fisher JA, Sharp E, Graubard BI, Ward MH, Jones RR. Sociodemographic inequities in the burden of carcinogenic industrial air emissions in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 2024; 116:737-744. [PMID: 38180898 PMCID: PMC11077313 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djae001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Industrial facilities are not located uniformly across communities in the United States, but how the burden of exposure to carcinogenic air emissions may vary across population characteristics is unclear. We evaluated differences in carcinogenic industrial pollution among major sociodemographic groups in the United States and Puerto Rico. METHODS We evaluated cross-sectional associations of population characteristics including race and ethnicity, educational attainment, and poverty at the census tract level with point-source industrial emissions of 21 known human carcinogens using regulatory data from the US Environmental Protection Agency. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals comparing the highest emissions (tertile or quintile) to the referent group (zero emissions [ie, nonexposed]) for all sociodemographic characteristics were estimated using multinomial, population density-adjusted logistic regression models. RESULTS In 2018, approximately 7.4 million people lived in census tracts with nearly 12 million pounds of carcinogenic air releases. The odds of tracts having the greatest burden of benzene, 1,3-butadiene, ethylene oxide, formaldehyde, trichloroethylene, and nickel emissions compared with nonexposed were 10%-20% higher for African American populations, whereas White populations were up to 18% less likely to live in tracts with the highest emissions. Among Hispanic and Latino populations, odds were 16%-21% higher for benzene, 1,3-butadiene, and ethylene oxide. Populations experiencing poverty or with less than high school education were associated with up to 51% higher burden, irrespective of race and ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS Carcinogenic industrial emissions disproportionately impact African American and Hispanic and Latino populations and people with limited education or experiencing poverty thus representing a source of pollution that may contribute to observed cancer disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica M Madrigal
- Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD, USA
| | | | - Jared A Fisher
- Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Elizabeth Sharp
- Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Barry I Graubard
- Biostatistics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Mary H Ward
- Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Rena R Jones
- Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Barber LE, Maliniak ML, Nash R, Moubadder L, Haynes D, Ward KC, McCullough LE. A Comparison of Three Area-Level Indices of Neighborhood Deprivation and Socioeconomic Status and their Applicability to Breast Cancer Mortality. J Urban Health 2024; 101:75-79. [PMID: 38158547 PMCID: PMC10897108 DOI: 10.1007/s11524-023-00811-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
Neighborhood deprivation indices are widely used in research, but the performance of these indices has rarely been directly compared in the same analysis. We examined the Area Deprivation Index, Neighborhood Deprivation Index, and Yost index, and compared their associations with breast cancer mortality. Indices were constructed for Georgia census block groups using 2011-2015 American Community Survey data. Pearson correlation coefficients and percent agreement were calculated. Associations between each index and breast cancer mortality were estimated among 36,795 women diagnosed with breast cancer using Cox proportional hazards regression. The indices were strongly correlated (absolute value of correlation coefficients > 0.77), exhibited moderate (41.4%) agreement, and were similarly associated with a 36% increase in breast cancer mortality. The similar associations with breast cancer mortality suggest the indices measure the same underlying construct, despite only moderate agreement. By understanding their correlations, agreement, and associations with health outcomes, researchers can choose the most appropriate index for analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren E Barber
- Department of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, 1518 Clifton Road, Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, USA.
| | - Maret L Maliniak
- Department of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, 1518 Clifton Road, Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, USA
| | - Rebecca Nash
- Department of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, 1518 Clifton Road, Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, USA
| | - Leah Moubadder
- Department of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, 1518 Clifton Road, Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, USA
| | - David Haynes
- Institute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Kevin C Ward
- Department of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, 1518 Clifton Road, Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, USA
| | - Lauren E McCullough
- Department of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, 1518 Clifton Road, Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Neslund-Dudas C, Tang A, Alleman E, Zarins KR, Li P, Simoff MJ, Lafata JE, Rendle KA, Hartman ANB, Honda SA, Oshiro C, Olaiya O, Greenlee RT, Vachani A, Ritzwoller DP. Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening CT After a Provider Order for Screening in the PROSPR-Lung Consortium. J Gen Intern Med 2024; 39:186-194. [PMID: 37783984 PMCID: PMC10853157 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08408-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uptake of lung cancer screening (LCS) has been slow with less than 20% of eligible people who currently or formerly smoked reported to have undergone a screening CT. OBJECTIVE To determine individual-, health system-, and neighborhood-level factors associated with LCS uptake after a provider order for screening. DESIGN AND SUBJECTS We conducted an observational cohort study of screening-eligible patients within the Population-based Research to Optimize the Screening Process (PROSPR)-Lung Consortium who received a radiology referral/order for a baseline low-dose screening CT (LDCT) from a healthcare provider between January 1, 2015, and June 30, 2019. MAIN MEASURES The primary outcome is screening uptake, defined as LCS-LDCT completion within 90 days of the screening order date. KEY RESULTS During the study period, 18,294 patients received their first order for LCS-LDCT. Orders more than doubled from the beginning to the end of the study period. Overall, 60% of patients completed screening after receiving their first LCS-LDCT order. Across health systems, uptake varied from 41 to 87%. In both univariate and multivariable analyses, older age, male sex, former smoking status, COPD, and receiving care in a centralized LCS program were positively associated with completing LCS-LDCT. Unknown insurance status, other or unknown race, and lower neighborhood socioeconomic status, as measured by the Yost Index, were negatively associated with screening uptake. CONCLUSIONS Overall, 40% of patients referred for LCS did not complete a LDCT within 90 days, highlighting a substantial gap in the lung screening care pathway, particularly in decentralized screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Neslund-Dudas
- Henry Ford Health System and Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA.
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, One Ford Place, Suite 3E, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA.
| | - Amy Tang
- Henry Ford Health System and Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Elizabeth Alleman
- Henry Ford Health System and Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Katie R Zarins
- Henry Ford Health System and Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Pin Li
- Henry Ford Health System and Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Michael J Simoff
- Henry Ford Health System and Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Jennifer Elston Lafata
- Henry Ford Health System and Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA
- UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Katharine A Rendle
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Stacey A Honda
- Center for Integrated Healthcare Research, Kaiser Permanente Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA
- Hawaii Permanente Medical Group, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Caryn Oshiro
- Center for Integrated Healthcare Research, Kaiser Permanente Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | | | | | - Anil Vachani
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Debra P Ritzwoller
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Guadamuz JS, Wang X, Royce TJ, Calip GS. Sociodemographic Inequities in Telemedicine Use Among US Patients Initiating Treatment in Community Cancer Centers During the Ongoing COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020-2022. JCO Oncol Pract 2023; 19:1206-1214. [PMID: 37748113 PMCID: PMC10732501 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Revised: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Although telemedicine was seen as a way to improve cancer care during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, there is limited information regarding inequities in its uptake. This study assessed sociodemographic factors associated with telemedicine use among patients initiating treatment for 20 common cancers. METHODS This retrospective cohort study used deidentified electronic health record-derived patient data from a nationwide network of community cancer practices, linked to area-level Census information. We included adults (age 18 years and older) who initiated first-line systemic cancer treatment between March 2020 and December 2022 (follow-up through March 2023). Exposures include race/ethnicity, insurance status, and area-level social determinants of health (eg, block group socioeconomic status [SES]). The outcome was telemedicine use within 90 days after treatment initiation. Associations were examined using logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, performance status, stage, and cancer type. RESULTS This study included 36,993 patients (48.6% women; median age, 69 years), of whom 15.1% used telemedicine services. Black (12.2%; odds ratio [OR], 0.78 [95% CI, 0.70 to 0.88]) and uninsured (9.2%; OR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.48 to 0.73]) patients were less likely to use telemedicine services than their White and well-insured counterparts (14.5% and 15.0%, respectively). Patients in rural (9.7%; OR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.46 to 0.57]), suburban (11.8%; OR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.61 to 0.74]), and low SES areas (9.9%; OR, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.35 to 0.43]) were less also likely to use telemedicine than their counterparts in urban (16.6%) or high SES (21.6%) areas. CONCLUSION Nearly one sixth of patients initiating cancer treatment during the pandemic used telemedicine, but there were substantial inequities. The proliferation of telemedicine may perpetuate cancer care inequities if marginalized populations do not have equitable access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny S. Guadamuz
- Flatiron Health, New York, NY
- Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA
- School of Pharmacy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Trevor J. Royce
- Flatiron Health, New York, NY
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Gregory S. Calip
- Flatiron Health, New York, NY
- School of Pharmacy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rollings KA, Noppert GA, Griggs JJ, Melendez RA, Clarke PJ. Comparison of two area-level socioeconomic deprivation indices: Implications for public health research, practice, and policy. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0292281. [PMID: 37797080 PMCID: PMC10553799 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare 2 frequently used area-level socioeconomic deprivation indices: the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI). METHODS Index agreement was assessed via pairwise correlations, decile score distribution and mean comparisons, and mapping. The 2019 ADI and 2018 SVI indices at the U.S. census tract-level were analyzed. RESULTS Index correlation was modest (R = 0.51). Less than half (44.4%) of all tracts had good index agreement (0-1 decile difference). Among the 6.3% of tracts with poor index agreement (≥6 decile difference), nearly 1 in 5 were classified by high SVI and low ADI scores. Index items driving poor agreement, such as high rents, mortgages, and home values in urban areas with characteristics indicative of socioeconomic deprivation, were also identified. CONCLUSIONS Differences in index dimensions and agreement indicated that ADI and SVI are not interchangeable measures of socioeconomic deprivation at the tract level. Careful consideration is necessary when selecting an area-level socioeconomic deprivation measure that appropriately defines deprivation relative to the context in which it will be used. How deprivation is operationalized affects interpretation by researchers as well as public health practitioners and policymakers making decisions about resource allocation and working to address health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly A. Rollings
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Health & Design Research Fellowship Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
| | - Grace A. Noppert
- Institute for Social Research, Social Environment and Health, Survey Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
| | - Jennifer J. Griggs
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
- Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
| | - Robert A. Melendez
- Institute for Social Research, Social Environment and Health, Survey Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
| | - Philippa J. Clarke
- Institute for Social Research, Social Environment and Health, Survey Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lines LM, Long MC, Zangeneh S, DePriest K, Piontak J, Humphrey J, Subramanian S. Composite Indices of Social Determinants of Health: Overview, Measurement Gaps, and Research Priorities for Health Equity. Popul Health Manag 2023; 26:332-340. [PMID: 37824819 DOI: 10.1089/pop.2023.0106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2023] Open
Abstract
The goal of health equity is for all people to have opportunities and resources for optimal health outcomes regardless of their social identities, residence in marginalized communities, and/or experience with oppressive systems. Social determinants of health (SDOH)-the conditions in which we are born, grow, live, work, and age-are inextricably tied to health equity. Advancing health equity thus requires reliable measures of SDOH. In the United States, comprehensive individual-level data on SDOH are difficult to collect, may be inaccurate, and do not capture all dimensions of inequitable outcomes. Individual area-based indicators are widely available, but difficult to use in practice. Numerous area-level composite indices are available to describe SDOH, but there is no consensus on which indices are most appropriate to use. This article presents an analytic taxonomy of currently available SDOH composite indices and compares their components and predictive ability, providing insights into gaps and areas for further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa M Lines
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Marque C Long
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sahar Zangeneh
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
- University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Kelli DePriest
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
- Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Joy Piontak
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jamie Humphrey
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
- Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Desai RH, Hollingsworth H, Stark S, Putnam M, Eyler A, Wehmeier A, Morgan K. Social participation of adults aging with long-term physical disabilities: A cross-sectional study investigating the role of transportation mode and urban vs rural living. Disabil Health J 2023; 16:101503. [PMID: 37455234 PMCID: PMC10686629 DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2023.101503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adults aging with long-term physical disabilities (AAwPDs) experience barriers in the built environment that can hinder their participation in meaningful social roles and activities. However, interventions addressing built environment barriers to participation for AAwPD are limited. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to examine how the built environment and other socioenvironmental factors influence the social participation of AAwPD to inform future interventions and service provision. We hypothesized that social participation would be significantly different between AAwPD using private versus public transportation and living in urban versus rural areas. METHODS This cross-sectional study of 331 Missouri-dwelling AAwPD reports findings on relationships among transportation mode, urban versus rural residence, and ability to participate in social roles and activities using PROMIS measures. A multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) explored differences in social participation across transportation mode and residential location. Linear regression examined associations among socioenvironmental factors, individual factors, and social participation. RESULTS The MANCOVA demonstrated significant differences in social participation across transportation mode and urban versus rural residential location. Specifically, AAwPD using paratransit and living in urban areas reported significantly higher social participation than rural-dwelling individuals and private transportation users (p < .001). The linear regression revealed that individual factors served a larger role in predicting social participation than built or social environmental factors. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that transportation mode plays a significant role in shaping social participation outcomes for AAwPD. However, compared to built and social environmental factors, individual factors (i.e., physical function, 'aging-with-disability' symptoms) may restrict social participation more.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Heeb Desai
- Washington University School of Medicine, Program in Occupational Therapy, 4444 Forest Park Ave., St. Louis, MO, USA.
| | - Holly Hollingsworth
- Washington University School of Medicine, Program in Occupational Therapy, 4444 Forest Park Ave., St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Susy Stark
- Washington University School of Medicine, Program in Occupational Therapy, 4444 Forest Park Ave., St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Michelle Putnam
- Simmons University, School of Social Work, 300 the Fenway, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Amy Eyler
- Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Dr., Brown School of Public Health, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Aimee Wehmeier
- Paraquad Center for Independent Living, 5240 Oakland Ave., St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Kerri Morgan
- Washington University School of Medicine, Program in Occupational Therapy, 4444 Forest Park Ave., St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Guadamuz JS, Wang X, Ryals CA, Miksad RA, Snider J, Walters J, Calip GS. Socioeconomic status and inequities in treatment initiation and survival among patients with cancer, 2011-2022. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2023; 7:pkad058. [PMID: 37707536 PMCID: PMC10582690 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkad058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lower neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with suboptimal cancer care and reduced survival. Most studies examining cancer inequities across area-level socioeconomic status tend to use less granular or unidimensional measures and pre-date the COVID-19 pandemic. Here, we examined the association of area-level socioeconomic status on real-world treatment initiation and overall survival among adults with 20 common cancers. METHODS This retrospective cohort study used electronic health record-derived deidentified data (Flatiron Health Research Database, 2011-2022) linked to US Census Bureau data from the American Community Survey (2015-2019). Area-level socioeconomic status quintiles (based on a measure incorporating income, home values, rental costs, poverty, blue-collar employment, unemployment, and education information) were computed from the US population and applied to patients based on their mailing address. Associations were examined using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for diagnosis year, age, sex, performance status, stage, and cancer type. RESULTS This cohort included 291 419 patients (47.7% female; median age = 68 years). Patients from low-SES areas were younger and more likely to be Black (21.9% vs 3.3%) or Latinx (8.4% vs 3.0%) than those in high-SES areas. Living in low-SES areas (vs high) was associated with lower treatment rates (hazard ratio = 0.94 [95% confidence interval = 0.93 to 0.95]) and reduced survival (median real-world overall survival = 21.4 vs 29.5 months, hazard ratio = 1.20 [95% confidence interval = 1.18 to 1.22]). Treatment and survival inequities were observed in 9 and 19 cancer types, respectively. Area-level socioeconomic inequities in treatment and survival remained statistically significant in the COVID-19 era (after March 2020). CONCLUSION To reduce inequities in cancer outcomes, efforts that target marginalized, low-socioeconomic status neighborhoods are necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny S Guadamuz
- Flatiron Health, New York, NY, USA
- Division of Health Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, School of Public Health, Berkeley, CA, USA
- Program on Medicines and Public Health, University of Southern California School of Pharmacy, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Rebecca A Miksad
- Flatiron Health, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Gregory S Calip
- Flatiron Health, New York, NY, USA
- Program on Medicines and Public Health, University of Southern California School of Pharmacy, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hannan EL, Wu Y, Cozzens K, Anderson B. The Neighborhood Atlas Area Deprivation Index For Measuring Socioeconomic Status: An Overemphasis On Home Value. Health Aff (Millwood) 2023; 42:702-709. [PMID: 37126749 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.01406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
The Area Deprivation Index (ADI), popularized by the Neighborhood Atlas, is a multifaceted proxy measure for assessing socioeconomic disadvantage that captures social risk factors that are not available in typical clinical registries and that are related to adverse health outcomes. In applying the ADI to New York State, we found that the downstate regions (New York City and its suburbs) were as deprived as or more deprived than the other regions for thirteen of the seventeen ADI variables (all but the ones measured in dollars), but the Neighborhood Atlas-computed overall ADI deprivation was much less in the downstate areas. Numerous census block groups with high home values (indicating low deprivation) accompanied by high deprivation in the other ADI variables had overall ADI scores as computed by the Neighborhood Atlas in the same or contiguous deciles as the home values. We concluded that Neighborhood Atlas-computed ADI scores for New York block groups are mainly representative of median home value. This can be especially problematic when considering quality assessment, funding, and resource allocation in regions with large variations in cost of living, and it may result in underresourcing for disadvantaged communities with high housing prices. We conclude that the Neighborhood Atlas ADI would be more accurate for comparing block groups if variables were standardized before computing the overall index.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward L Hannan
- Edward L. Hannan , State University of New York at Albany, Rensselaer, New York
| | - Yifeng Wu
- Yifeng Wu, State University of New York at Albany
| | | | - Brett Anderson
- Brett Anderson, NewYork-Presbyterian Columbia-Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Park C, Schappe T, Peskoe S, Mohottige D, Chan NW, Bhavsar NA, Boulware LE, Pendergast J, Kirk AD, McElroy LM. A comparison of deprivation indices and application to transplant populations. Am J Transplant 2023; 23:377-386. [PMID: 36695687 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2022.11.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2022] [Revised: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
The choice of deprivation index can influence conclusions drawn regarding the extent of deprivation within a community and the identification of the most deprived communities in the United States. This study aimed to determine the degree of correlation among deprivation indices commonly used to characterize transplant populations. We used a retrospective cohort consisting of adults listed for liver or kidney transplants between 2008 and 2018 to compare 4 deprivation indices: neighborhood deprivation index, social deprivation index (SDI), area deprivation index, and social vulnerability index. Pairwise correlation between deprivation indices by transplant referral regions was measured using Spearman correlations of population-weighted medians and upper quartiles. In total, 52 individual variables were used among the 4 deprivation indices with 25% overlap. For both organs, the correlation between the population-weighted 75th percentile of the deprivation indices by transplant referral region was highest between SDI and social vulnerability index (liver and kidney, 0.93) and lowest between area deprivation index and SDI (liver, 0.19 and kidney, 0.15). The choice of deprivation index affects the applicability of research findings across studies examining the relationship between social risk and clinical outcomes. Appropriate application of these measures to transplant populations requires careful index selection based on the intended use and included variable relevance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Park
- Division of Abdominal Transplant, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Tyler Schappe
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Sarah Peskoe
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Dinushika Mohottige
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Duke University, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Norine W Chan
- Division of Abdominal Transplant, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Nrupen A Bhavsar
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - L Ebony Boulware
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jane Pendergast
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Allan D Kirk
- Division of Abdominal Transplant, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Lisa M McElroy
- Division of Abdominal Transplant, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Oka M. Census-Tract-Level Median Household Income and Median Family Income Estimates: A Unidimensional Measure of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status? INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 20:211. [PMID: 36612534 PMCID: PMC9819545 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20010211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Revised: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Previous studies suggested either census-tract-level median household income (MHI) or median family income (MFI) estimates may be used as a unidimensional measure of neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) in the United States (US). To better understand its general use, the purpose of this study was to assess the usefulness of MHI and MFI in a wide range of geographic areas. Area-based socioeconomic data at the census tract level were obtained from the 2000 Census as well as the 2005-2009, 2010-2014, and 2015-2019 American Community Survey. MHI and MFI were used as two simple measures of neighborhood SES. Based on the five area-based indexes developed in the US, several census-tract-level socioeconomic indicators were used to derive five composite measures of neighborhood SES. Then, a series of correlation analyses was conducted to assess the relationships between these seven measures in the State of California and its seven Metropolitan Statistical Areas. Two simple measures were very strongly and positively correlated with one another, and were also strongly or very strongly correlated, either positively or negatively, with five composite measures. Hence, the results of this study support an analytical thinking that simple measures and composite measures may capture the same dimension of neighborhood SES in different geographic areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masayoshi Oka
- Department of Management, Faculty of Management, Josai University, Sakado 350-0295, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Whitaker KD, Wang X, Ascha M, Showalter TN, Lewin HG, Calip GS, Goldstein LJ. Racial inequities in second-line treatment and overall survival among patients with metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2022; 196:163-173. [PMID: 36028783 PMCID: PMC9550747 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06701-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Black women in the USA have a higher incidence and mortality of metastatic breast cancer (mBC) than White women, while Hispanic women have lower rates. Previous studies have focused on first-line (1L) treatment, but little is known about racial differences in treatment beyond 1L and their impact on outcomes. METHODS This analysis utilized data from an electronic health record derived de-identified database and included patients with HR+HER2- mBC initiating 2L treatment (including CDK4/6-inhibitor [CDKi]-based, endocrine monotherapy, everolimus combination therapy, and chemotherapy and other systemic therapies) between 2/3/2015 and 7/31/2021. Real-world overall survival (rwOS) was defined as time from 2L initiation to death. Multinomial logistic regression assessed the likelihood of 2L treatment between race/ethnicity groups. Median rwOS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and adjusted hazard ratios were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS Among all patients who received 2L, non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and Hispanic/Latino patients were less likely to receive 2L CDKi compared to non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients (36%, 39% vs 42%, respectively). Median rwOS was 20.4, 37.6, and 25.3 months, in NHB, Hispanic/Latino and NHW patients, respectively. The rwOS remained poorer among NHB patients after adjustment (HR = 1.16; p = 0.009). In stratified analysis, adjusted rwOS was similar between NHB and NHW patients among those who received 1L CDKi. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that among patients with HR+HER2- mBC, NHB patients had worse survival beyond front-line setting, mainly among the subset of women who did not receive CDKi at 1L. This inequities in rwOS between race/ethnicity groups was not observed among patients who received 1L CDKi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen D Whitaker
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA.
| | - Xiaoliang Wang
- Flatiron Health, Inc, 233 Spring Street 5th Floor, New York, NY, 10013, USA.
| | - Mustafa Ascha
- Flatiron Health, Inc, 233 Spring Street 5th Floor, New York, NY, 10013, USA
| | - Timothy N Showalter
- Flatiron Health, Inc, 233 Spring Street 5th Floor, New York, NY, 10013, USA
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Heather G Lewin
- Flatiron Health, Inc, 233 Spring Street 5th Floor, New York, NY, 10013, USA
| | - Gregory S Calip
- Flatiron Health, Inc, 233 Spring Street 5th Floor, New York, NY, 10013, USA
- University of Illinois at Chicago College of Pharmacy, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Lori J Goldstein
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bhambhvani HP, Peterson DJ, Sheth KR. Sociodemographic factors associated with Wilms tumor treatment and survival: a population-based study. Int Urol Nephrol 2022; 54:3055-3062. [PMID: 36069962 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-022-03343-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Though Wilms tumor (WT) is one of the most common malignancies in children, there is a paucity of epidemiologic studies exploring sociodemographic disparities in treatment and survival. Here, we leveraged a national cancer registry to examine sociodemographic factors associated with receipt of adjuvant therapy, either chemotherapy or radiation, as well as overall survival among pediatric patients with WT. MATERIALS AND METHODS Within the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database (2000-2016), we identified 2043 patients (≤ 20 years of age) with unilateral WT. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models were constructed to examine the association of sociodemographic factors with, respectively, adjuvant chemotherapy/radiotherapy and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Patients in the lowest SES quintile (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.33-0.93, p = 0.03) were less likely to receive chemotherapy as compared to those in the highest SES quintile, though this association did not persist in sensitivity analyses including only patients at least 2 years of age and patients with regional/distant disease. In addition, female patients were more likely to receive chemotherapy (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.08-1.97, p = 0.02) than male patients. Age, race, year of diagnosis, insurance status, and tumor laterality were not associated with receipt of chemotherapy. No sociodemographic variables were associated with receipt of radiotherapy. Lastly, as compared to Non-Hispanic-White patients, Hispanic patients had worse OS (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.08-2.35, p = 0.02); no other sociodemographic variables were associated with OS. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests multilevel sociodemographic disparities involving ethnicity and SES in WT treatment and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hriday P Bhambhvani
- Department of Urology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA.
- Department of Urology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College, 525 East 68th Street, Starr 9, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| | - Dylan J Peterson
- Department of Urology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Kunj R Sheth
- Department of Urology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jordan KH, Fisher JL, Paskett ED. Distinct sociodemographic differences in incidence and survival rates for human papillomavirus (HPV)-like, non-HPV-like, and “other”-like oral cavity and pharynx cancers: An analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program data. Front Oncol 2022; 12:980900. [PMID: 36072808 PMCID: PMC9444004 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.980900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Oral cavity and pharynx cancer (OCPC) cases are traditionally dichotomized into human papillomavirus (HPV) and non-HPV types. Using a proxy for HPV status, the objective was to evaluate differences in incidence and survival rates of OCPC anatomic sub-sites identified as: 1) HPV-like; 2) non-HPV-like (i.e., tobacco/alcohol-related); and 3) “other”-like (i.e., not predominantly HPV-like nor tobacco/alcohol-like) OCPCs. Methods Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program were used to examine incidence and survival rates for OCPC categories over time and according to age, sex, race, ethnicity, stage at diagnosis, neighborhood socioeconomic status (i.e., nSES or Yost Index), and rurality/urbanity (i.e., Rural Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) codes). Although HPV status was unavailable in this dataset, OCPC anatomies and histologies were classified into three sub-categories, based on potential risk factors. Frequencies, average annual, age-adjusted incidence rates, five-year relative survival rates, and 95% confidence intervals were examined across and within OCPC categories. Results HPV-like OCPC incidence rates sharply increased from 1975 through 2015 while non-HPV-like and “other”-like OCPC rates decreased, all converging to similar rates from 2016 through 2018. Increasing over time for both categories, survival was highest for HPV-like and lowest for non-HPV-like OCPCs; survival for “other”-like OCPCs remained stable. Generally, across OCPC categories, incidence and survival rates were significantly higher among males vs. females, Whites vs. African Americans, and non-Hispanics vs. Hispanics. “Other”-like OCPC incidence decreased with increasing nSES tertiles, while no nSES differences were observed for HPV-like and non-HPV-like OCPCs. Incidence rates were significantly lower among urban (vs. rural) residents. For all OCPC categories, survival rates were significantly higher with increasing nSES and variable across RUCA categories. Conclusion/Impact HPV-like and non-HPV-like OCPC cases had distinct sociodemographic differences; “other”-like OCPC cases were a sociodemographic blend of HPV-like and non-HPV-like OCPC cases, resembling more of the sociodemographic makeup of non-HPV-like OCPC cases. To prevent new OCPCs, additional studies are needed to epidemiologically and clinically differentiate between OCPC categories so that high-risk groups can be better targeted in future public health interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey H. Jordan
- Division of Population Sciences, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
- *Correspondence: Kelsey H. Jordan, ; James L. Fisher,
| | - James L. Fisher
- Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
- Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, United States
- *Correspondence: Kelsey H. Jordan, ; James L. Fisher,
| | - Electra D. Paskett
- Division of Population Sciences, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
- Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
- Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, United States
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sharma RK, Grewal MR, Long SM, DiDonna B, Sturm J, Hills SE, Troob SH. Tracheostomy Outcomes in Patients With COVID-19 at a New York City Hospital. OTO Open 2022; 6:2473974X221101025. [PMID: 35663351 PMCID: PMC9160903 DOI: 10.1177/2473974x221101025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Tracheostomies have been performed in patients with prolonged intubation due to COVID-19. Understanding outcomes in different populations is crucial to tackle future epidemics. Study Design Prospective cohort study. Setting Tertiary academic medical center in New York City. Methods A prospectively collected database of patients with COVID-19 undergoing open tracheostomy between March 2020 and April 2020 was reviewed. Primary endpoints were weaning from the ventilator and from sedation and time to decannulation. Results Sixty-six patients underwent tracheostomy. There were 42 males (64%) with an average age of 62 years (range, 23-91). Patients were intubated for a median time of 26 days prior to tracheostomy (interquartile range [IQR], 23-30). The median time to weaning from ventilatory support after tracheostomy was 18 days (IQR, 10-29). Of those sedated at the time of tracheostomy, the median time to discontinuation of sedation was 5 days (IQR, 3-9). Of patients who survived, 39 (69%) were decannulated. Of those decannulated before discharge (n = 39), the median time to decannulation was 36 days (IQR, 27-49) following tracheostomy. The median time from ventilator liberation to decannulation was 14 days (IQR, 8-22). Thirteen patients (20.0%) had minor bleeding requiring packing. Two patients (3%) had bleeding requiring neck exploration. The all-cause mortality rate was 10.6%. No patients died of procedural causes, and no surgeons acquired COVID-19. Conclusion Open tracheostomies were successfully and safely performed at our institution in the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. The majority of patients were successfully weaned from the ventilator and sedation. Approximately 60% of patients were decannulated prior to hospital discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahul K. Sharma
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Maeher R. Grewal
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sallie M. Long
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Brendon DiDonna
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Joshua Sturm
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Susannah E. Hills
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Scott H. Troob
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Rodrigues A, Li G, Bhambhvani H, Hayden-Gephart M. Socioeconomic Disparities in Brain Metastasis Survival and Treatment: A Population-Based Study. World Neurosurg 2022; 158:e636-e644. [PMID: 34785360 PMCID: PMC9363111 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.11.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2021] [Revised: 11/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In the present study, we used a validated socioeconomic status (SES) index and population-based registry to identify and quantify the impact of SES on access to treatment and overall survival for patients diagnosed with synchronous brain metastases. METHODS The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to extract all patients between 2010 and 2016 with brain metastases at initial presentation. SES was stratified into tertiles and quintiles using the validated Yost index. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to evaluate the impact of demographic, tumor, and socioeconomic covariates on receipt of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate survival. RESULTS Between 2010 and 2016, 35,595 patients presented with brain metastases at the time of primary cancer diagnosis. Most patients received radiation and/or chemotherapy as part of the initial course of their treatment; 71.6% (n = 25,484) were irradiated while 54.4% (n = 19,371) received chemotherapy and 44.9% (n = 15,984) received chemoradiation. Patients in the highest Yost tertile and quintile experienced longer overall survival (P < 0.001). Additionally, multivariable logistic regression revealed that the lowest Yost quintile was significantly less likely to receive either radiation (adjusted OR: 0.82; 95% confidence interval: 0.75-0.89; P < 0.001) or chemotherapy (adjusted OR: 0.62; 95% confidence interval: 0.58-0.67; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In a large, population-based analysis of brain metastasis patients, we found significant differences in treatment access and mild survival differences along socioeconomic strata. More specifically, patients in lower SES tiers suffered worse outcomes and received radiation and chemotherapy less frequently than patients in higher tiers, even after accounting for other tumor- and demographic-related information.
Collapse
|
19
|
Ethnicity, socioeconomic status, income inequality, and colorectal cancer outcomes: evidence from the 4C2 collaboration. Cancer Causes Control 2022; 33:533-546. [PMID: 34982317 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-021-01547-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE National Cancer Institute (NCI)-Designated Cancer Centers are required to assess and address the needs of their catchments. In rural regions, catchment areas are vast, populations small, and infrastructure for data capture limited, making analyses of cancer patterns challenging. METHODS The four NCI-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers in the southern Rocky Mountain region formed the Four Corners Collaboration (4C2) to address these challenges. Colorectal cancer (CRC) was identified as a disease site where disparities exist. The 4C2 leaders examined how geographic and sociodemographic characteristics were correlated to stage at diagnosis and survival in the region and compared those relationships to a sample from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) program. RESULTS In 4C2, Hispanics were more likely to live in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas relative to their counterparts in the SEER program. These residency patterns were positively correlated with later stage diagnosis and higher mortality. Living in an area with high-income inequality was positively associated with mortality for Non-Hispanic whites in 4C2. In SEER, Hispanics had a slightly higher likelihood of distant stage disease, and disadvantaged socioeconomic status was associated with poor survival. CONCLUSION CRC interventions in 4C2 will target socioeconomically disadvantaged areas, especially those with higher income inequality, to improve outcomes among Hispanics and Non-Hispanic whites. The collaboration demonstrates how bringing NCI-Designated Cancer Centers together to identify and address common population catchment issues provides opportunity for pooled analyses of small, but important populations, and thus, capitalize on synergies among researchers to reduce cancer disparities.
Collapse
|
20
|
Siegel SD, Brooks MM, Lynch SM, Sims-Mourtada J, Schug ZT, Curriero FC. Racial disparities in triple negative breast cancer: toward a causal architecture approach. Breast Cancer Res 2022; 24:37. [PMID: 35650633 PMCID: PMC9158353 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-022-01533-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype of invasive breast cancer that disproportionately affects Black women and contributes to racial disparities in breast cancer mortality. Prior research has suggested that neighborhood effects may contribute to this disparity beyond individual risk factors. METHODS The sample included a cohort of 3316 breast cancer cases diagnosed between 2012 and 2020 in New Castle County, Delaware, a geographic region of the US with elevated rates of TNBC. Multilevel methods and geospatial mapping evaluated whether the race, income, and race/income versions of the neighborhood Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE) metric could efficiently identify census tracts (CT) with higher odds of TNBC relative to other forms of invasive breast cancer. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported; p-values < 0.05 were significant. Additional analyses examined area-level differences in exposure to metabolic risk factors, including unhealthy alcohol use and obesity. RESULTS The ICE-Race, -Income-, and Race/Income metrics were each associated with greater census tract odds of TNBC on a bivariate basis. However, only ICE-Race was significantly associated with higher odds of TNBC after adjustment for patient-level age and race (most disadvantaged CT: OR = 2.09; 95% CI 1.40-3.13), providing support for neighborhood effects. Higher counts of alcohol and fast-food retailers, and correspondingly higher rates of unhealthy alcohol use and obesity, were observed in CTs that were classified into the most disadvantaged ICE-Race quintile and had the highest odds of TNBC. CONCLUSION The use of ICE can facilitate the monitoring of cancer inequities and advance the study of racial disparities in breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott D. Siegel
- grid.414316.50000 0004 0444 1241Helen F. Graham Cancer Center and Research Institute, Christiana Care Health System, 4701 Ogletown-Stanton Road, Newark, DE 19713 USA ,grid.414316.50000 0004 0444 1241Institute for Research on Equity and Community Health, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, USA
| | - Madeline M. Brooks
- grid.414316.50000 0004 0444 1241Institute for Research on Equity and Community Health, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, USA
| | - Shannon M. Lynch
- grid.249335.a0000 0001 2218 7820Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Jennifer Sims-Mourtada
- grid.414316.50000 0004 0444 1241Helen F. Graham Cancer Center and Research Institute, Christiana Care Health System, 4701 Ogletown-Stanton Road, Newark, DE 19713 USA
| | - Zachary T. Schug
- grid.251075.40000 0001 1956 6678The Wistar Institute Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Frank C. Curriero
- grid.21107.350000 0001 2171 9311Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Spatial Science for Public Health Center, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ritzwoller DP, Meza R, Carroll NM, Blum-Barnett E, Burnett-Hartman AN, Greenlee RT, Honda SA, Neslund-Dudas C, Rendle KA, Vachani A. Evaluation of Population-Level Changes Associated With the 2021 US Preventive Services Task Force Lung Cancer Screening Recommendations in Community-Based Health Care Systems. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2128176. [PMID: 34636916 PMCID: PMC8511972 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) released updated lung cancer screening recommendations in 2021, lowering the screening age from 55 to 50 years and smoking history from 30 to 20 pack-years. These changes are expected to expand screening access to women and racial and ethnic minority groups. OBJECTIVE To estimate the population-level changes associated with the 2021 USPSTF expansion of lung cancer screening eligibility by sex, race and ethnicity, sociodemographic factors, and comorbidities in 5 community-based health care systems. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study analyzed data of patients who received care from any of 5 community-based health care systems (which are members of the Population-based Research to Optimize the Screening Process Lung Consortium, a collaboration that conducts research to better understand how to improve the cancer screening processes in community health care settings) from January 1, 2010, through September 30, 2019. Individuals who had complete smoking history and were engaged with the health care system for 12 or more continuous months were included. Those who had never smoked or who had unknown smoking history were excluded. EXPOSURES Electronic health record-derived age, sex, race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status (SES), comorbidities, and smoking history. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Differences in the proportion of the newly eligible population by age, sex, race and ethnicity, Charlson Comorbidity Index, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease diagnosis, and SES as well as lung cancer diagnoses under the 2013 recommendations vs the expected cases under the 2021 recommendations were evaluated using χ2 tests. RESULTS As of September 2019, there were 341 163 individuals aged 50 to 80 years who currently or previously smoked. Among these, 34 528 had electronic health record data that captured pack-year and quit-date information and were eligible for lung cancer screening according to the 2013 USPSTF recommendations. The 2021 USPSTF recommendations expanded screening eligibility to 18 533 individuals, representing a 53.7% increase. Compared with the 2013 cohort, the newly eligible 2021 population included 5833 individuals (31.5%) aged 50 to 54 years, a larger proportion of women (52.0% [n = 9631]), and more racial or ethnic minority groups. The relative increases in the proportion of newly eligible individuals were 60.6% for Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander; 67.4% for Hispanic; 69.7% for non-Hispanic Black; and 49.0% for non-Hispanic White groups. The relative increase for women was 13.8% higher than for men (61.2% vs 47.4%), and those with a lower comorbidity burden and lower SES had higher relative increases (eg, 68.7% for a Charlson Comorbidity Index score of 0; 61.1% for lowest SES). The 2021 recommendations were associated with an estimated 30% increase in incident lung cancer diagnoses compared with the 2013 recommendations. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This cohort study suggests that, in diverse health care systems, adopting the 2021 USPSTF recommendations will increase the number of women, racial and ethnic minority groups, and individuals with lower SES who are eligible for lung cancer screening, thus helping to minimize the barriers to screening access for individuals with high risk for lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rafael Meza
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Nikki M. Carroll
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora
| | | | | | | | - Stacey A. Honda
- Center for Integrated Healthcare Research, Kaiser Permanente Hawaii, Oahu
| | | | | | - Anil Vachani
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Liu B, Ornstein KA, Alpert N, Schwartz RM, Dharmarajan KV, Kelley AS, Taioli E. Trends of hospitalizations among patients with both cancer and dementia diagnoses in New York 2007-2017. HEALTHCARE (AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS) 2021; 9:100565. [PMID: 34252707 PMCID: PMC8453053 DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2021.100565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2020] [Revised: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer and dementia have often been studied in isolation. We aimed to examine the spatiotemporal trend of inpatient admissions with both cancer and dementia diagnoses. METHODS Using state-wide inpatient claims data, we identified all hospital admissions for patients aged ≥50 years with both cancer and dementia diagnoses in New York State, 2007-2017. We examined the spatiotemporal trend of the admission using a novel Bayesian hierarchical model adjusting for socioeconomic factor, as measured by Yost index. RESULTS Admissions with the presence of both cancer and dementia diagnoses represented 8.5% of all admissions with a cancer diagnosis, and the proportion increased from 7.1% in 2007 to 9.7% in 2017. The median admission rate was 3.5 (interquartile range: 2.2-5.2) hospitalizations per 1000 population aged ≥50 years, which increased from 2.9 in 2007 to 3.7 in 2017. The admission rate peaked first in 2010 followed by a smaller peak in 2014, before stabilizing at a level higher than the pre-2010 period. Taking into account the spatiotemporal heterogeneity, we found that hospitalizations among those with both cancer and dementia diagnoses were associated with a higher socioeconomic status (the posterior median relative risk for Yost index = 1.046 (95% credible interval: 1.033-1.058)). CONCLUSIONS Hospitalizations of patients with both cancer and dementia increased over time. Cancer care providers and healthcare systems should be prepared to provide prevention and management strategies and engage in complex medical decision-making for this increasingly common patient population comprised of individuals with cancer and dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bian Liu
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Institute for Translational Epidemiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Katherine A Ornstein
- Institute for Translational Epidemiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Naomi Alpert
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Institute for Translational Epidemiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rebecca M Schwartz
- Department of Occupational Medicine, Epidemiology and Prevention, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Great Neck, NY, USA
| | - Kavita V Dharmarajan
- Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amy S Kelley
- Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Emanuela Taioli
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Institute for Translational Epidemiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|