Japan Strengthens Regenerative Medicine Oversight

Biosafety and regulatory issues of RNA therapeutics

RNA therapy has recently emerged as a therapy targeting specific genes or proteins. With its outstanding advantages, this therapy has opened promising doors for treating and preventing diseases. The great application potential has driven the need for a comprehensive understanding of these therapies, particularly on biosafety and regulatory issues. This chapter began by discussing the risks to RNA therapy, such as off-target effects, immunogenicity and immune responses, and long-term effects. Since then, this therapy's intricate landscape of biosafety issues has been elucidated. Common biosecurity measures applied around the world have also been reviewed. In addition, this chapter emphasized the importance of regulations and laws in applying RNA therapy to prevent and treat human and animal diseases. At the same time, the current legal regulations in the world for RNA therapies have also been thoroughly discussed. To sum up, this chapter has provided a comprehensive perspective on biosafety and regulatory issues for developing RNA therapies. Understanding the biosafety and regulatory issues in RNA therapy can help researchers use this promising new technology safely and effectively in the future.

Development and regulation of stem cell-based therapies in China

BACKGROUND

Clinical researches of stem cell-based therapies are highly active in China, while it was arduous to determine the most effective way of clinical translation of those advanced therapies.

METHODS

This article briefly introduced the regulatory framework development, the progress in stem cell clinical researches and clinical trials of commercially developed stem cell-based products, as well as the clinical review concerns of stem cell-based products in China.

MAIN FINDINGS

The current regulatory framework of stem cell clinical researches in China was launched in 2015, when regulatory authorities issued "Administrative Measures on Stem Cell Clinical Research" (AMSCCR) detailing the rules of stem cell clinical research. Thereafter, the rapidly growing stem cell clinical researches were rigorously managed and clinical use of stem cell therapy was halted. Meanwhile, commercially developed stem cell-based products are supervised by Drug Administration Law (DAL).

CONCLUSION

The regulatory framework of stem cell-based therapy in China has progressed in the last few decades, which is currently regulated according to AMSCCR and DAL. Well-designed and patient-focused clinical trial is required for commercially developed stem cell-based products, and definite clinical benefit evidence is crucial to obtain marketing authorization.

Reflection on the enactment and impact of safety laws for regenerative medicine in Japan

Japan's Act on the Safety of Regenerative Medicine (ASRM) created an innovative regulatory framework intended to safely promote the clinical development of stem cell-based interventions (SCBIs) while subjecting commercialized unproven SCBIs to greater scrutiny and accountability. This article reviews ASRM's origins, explains its unprecedented scope, and assesses how it envisions the regulation of SCBIs. This analysis is used to highlight three key insights that are pertinent to the current revision of the ASRM: clarifying how the concept of safety should be defined and assessed in research and clinical care settings; revisiting risk criteria for review of SCBIs; and taking stronger measures to support the transition from unproven interventions to evidence-based therapies. Finally, the article reflects on lessons drawn from Japanese experiences in dealing with unproven SCBIs for international endeavors to regulate SCBIs.

Adoption of Regulations for Cell Therapy Development: Linkage Between Taiwan and Japan

Although cell-based therapy has become a promising treatment, its practice and evaluation process remain unstandardized. Therefore, Japan initiated a dual-track regulatory framework for cell-based therapy aiming to promote and regulate the therapies to ensure that patients can access safe and effective treatments. Influenced by such pathway, Taiwan adopted the framework and initiated its own cell-based therapy regulation in 2018. This paper discusses how Japan has influenced Taiwan in developing regulations for cell-based therapy.

Are patient educational resources effective at deterring stroke survivors from considering experimental stem cell treatments? A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether online resources developed to educate people about the risks associated with experimental stem cell (SC) treatments influence stroke survivors' attitudes about the safety and effectiveness of these treatments.

METHODS

Adult stroke survivors who had not previously received SC treatments (N = 112) were recruited from international stroke advocacy/support groups for a prospective, parallel-group randomized controlled trial. Participants indicated whether they were considering SC treatments (yes/no) prior to, immediately following, and 30-days after reading/viewing the International Society for Stem Cell Research booklet or Stem Cell Network video. Participant attitudes regarding the safety, effectiveness, accessibility and affordability of SC treatments were examined on each occasion, and compared to those of a waitlist control group.

RESULTS

Significantly fewer participants were considering SC treatments immediately after reading the SC research booklet (p =.031), although neither intervention had any impact after 30-days (p >.05). Waitlist and intervention groups reported positive attitudes toward SC treatments at each assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Stroke survivor attitudes toward SC treatments were initially influenced by the patient booklet, however these changes were not maintained.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Clinicians are encouraged to initiate discussions about experimental SC treatments during inpatient rehabilitation and to reinforce the risks throughout subsequent care.

Regulated, reliable, and reputable: Protect patients with uniform standards for stem cell treatments

The promise of cell and gene therapies is being realized as new products emerge to treat diseases once considered intractable. These treatments are emerging amidst reports of patients being injured by unproven "stem cell" interventions. At this juncture, it is vital to be supporting the continued development of promising regenerative medicine products while protecting patients from the risks posed by unproven interventions. Various stakeholders, including governments, patient groups, medical societies, and the media, are committed to this outcome. In this perspective, we draw on our experience gained from partnerships in developing regenerative medicine products to identify technical, organizational, and ethical benchmarks for the responsible delivery of regenerative medicine treatments. These benchmarks may serve as the basis for policy interventions intended to drive the responsible delivery of stem cell and regenerative medicine products. Our particular focus is on a California-based policy, but the suggested benchmarks are broadly applicable to national and international jurisdictions.

An impact analysis of the implementation of health technology assessment for new treatment of orphan diseases in Japan

Objectives: In Japan, a cost-effectiveness evaluation (CEE) for pricing was introduced in April 2019 and potentially covers orphan drugs (ODs) within its scope. The purpose of this study was to explore a reasonable approach to evaluate the utility of health technology assessment (HTA) for ODs in Japan. Methods: We extracted ODs that were approved in Japan from 2009 to 2018, and investigated their appraisals in the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia, where HTA and different frameworks on ODs have been implemented. Results: Overall, 76 ODs were identified, with high recommendation rates in the three countries (80.6%-90.9%). The major reason for negative recommendation was uncertainty regarding clinical effectiveness, with actual decisions varying across countries. This indicates difficulties in setting an objective evaluation for the uncertainty of clinical effectiveness. The results of the CEE were mainly used to adjust prices. Conclusion: As Japan's CEE is expected to be used only for price adjustment after reimbursement is secured, the approach seems to be similar to the other countries. However, pre-launch clinical data are limited and the peak sales of ODs vary in Japan. Therefore, the careful introduction of CEE and multifaceted measures referring to the policies for ODs in other countries should be considered.

The Role of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Radiation-Induced Lung Fibrosis

Radiation therapy is one of the most important treatment modalities for thoracic tumors. Despite significant advances in radiation techniques, radiation-induced lung injury (RILI) still occurs in up to 30% of patients undergoing thoracic radiotherapy, and therefore remains the main dose-limiting obstacle. RILI is a potentially lethal clinical complication of radiotherapy that has 2 main stages: an acute stage defined as radiation pneumonitis, and a late stage defined as radiation-induced lung fibrosis. Patients who develop lung fibrosis have a reduced quality of life with progressive and irreversible organ malfunction. Currently, the most effective intervention for the treatment of lung fibrosis is lung transplantation, but the lack of available lungs and transplantation-related complications severely limits the success of this procedure. Over the last few decades, advances have been reported in the use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for lung tissue repair and regeneration. MSCs not only replace damaged lung epithelial cells but also promote tissue repair through the secretion of anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic factors. Here, we present an overview of MSC-based therapy for radiation-induced lung fibrosis, focusing in particular on the molecular mechanisms involved and describing the most recent preclinical and clinical studies carried out in the field.

Multipotent Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for Pulmonary Fibrosis?

With the combination of ideologic beliefs and the will to survive, fraught patients and determined clinicians seek alternative therapies for treatment of terminal conditions, such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Unfortunately, the need for treatment has supported the growth of unapproved stem cell therapy over the years spanning across many countries. The reality, however, is that the science behind this therapy is lagging. While there have been promising results from phase I trials, there remain multiple reasons that "stem cells" are not ready for clinical application, starting from a gap in understanding at the bench research level, all the way to optimal clinical application in order to provide effective therapy.

Concise Review: Laying the Groundwork for a First-In-Human Study of an Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Based Intervention for Spinal Cord Injury

There have been numerous attempts to develop stem cell transplantation approaches to promote the regeneration of spinal cord injury (SCI). Our multicenter team is currently planning to launch a first-in-human clinical study of an induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-based cell transplant intervention for subacute SCI. This trial was conducted as class I regenerative medicine protocol as provided for under Japan's Act on the Safety of Regenerative Medicine, using neural stem/progenitor cells derived from a clinical-grade, integration-free human "iPSC stock" generated by the Kyoto University Center for iPS Cell Research and Application. In the present article, we describe how we are preparing to initiate this clinical study, including addressing the issues of safety and tumorigenesis as well as practical problems that must be overcome to enable the development of therapeutic interventions for patients with chronic SCI. Stem Cells 2019;37:6-13.

Mapping and driving the stem cell ecosystem

The stem cell and regenerative medicine arena has become increasingly complicated in recent years with thousands of people involved. There are as many as a dozen or more main groups of stakeholders, who together may be viewed as one ecosystem that is now rapidly evolving. The nature of the ecosystem and its evolution have major implications for not just those within it, but also for medicine and society at large. Here, I describe this ecosystem and its evolution, as well as the negative impacts within the ecosystem of a constellation of hundreds of unproven for-profit clinics and related businesses. Finally, I propose approaches for how to positively influence and drive the future of the global stem cell ecosystem.