1
|
Zambrano K, Castillo K, Peñaherrera S, Vasconez HC, Caicedo A, Gavilanes AWD. Understanding Post-COVID-19: Mechanisms, Neurological Complications, Current Treatments, and Emerging Therapies. Int J Gen Med 2024; 17:6303-6321. [PMID: 39717071 PMCID: PMC11664001 DOI: 10.2147/ijgm.s499905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2024] [Accepted: 12/06/2024] [Indexed: 12/25/2024] Open
Abstract
COVID-19, a highly infectious disease, caused a worldwide pandemic in early 2020. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), COVID-19 has resulted in approximately 774 million cases and around 7 million deaths. The effects of COVID-19 are well known; however, there is a lack of information on the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the symptoms that comprise Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome (PACS) or Long COVID-19. Neurological sequelae are common, with cognitive dysfunction being one of the foremost symptoms. Research indicates that elevated inflammatory levels and increased oxidative stress may play a role in the etiology and severity of PACS. Treatment options are extremely limited, and there is no consensus among the medical and scientific communities on how to manage the disease. Nevertheless, many scientists advocate for using antioxidants for symptomatic therapy and cognitive behavior therapy for supportive care. Additionally, current research aims to ameliorate several aspects of the inflammatory cascade. This review highlights the intracellular and extracellular pathways crucial to the neurological manifestations of PACS, providing valuable information for healthcare professionals and scientists. Given the complex nature of PACS, understanding these pathways is essential for developing new treatment options. Assessing PACS is challenging, and reviewing current therapeutic options while proposing a triad of potential therapeutic elements will add value to clinical assays and guidelines. Current therapeutic strategies, such as antioxidants/vitamin supplements, neurogenic stem cell therapy, and mitochondrial therapy, could be combined to enhance their effectiveness. Future research should focus on validating these approaches and exploring new avenues for the effective treatment of PACS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Zambrano
- Department of Health Sciences, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, School of Medicine, Quito, Ecuador
- Institute of Biomedical Research (Ibiomed), Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Quito, Ecuador
- School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (Mhens), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Mito-Act Research Consortium, Quito, Ecuador
- Neuroscience Institute, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Quito, Ecuador
| | - Karina Castillo
- Department of Health Sciences, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, School of Medicine, Quito, Ecuador
- Institute of Biomedical Research (Ibiomed), Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Quito, Ecuador
| | - Sebastian Peñaherrera
- Department of Health Sciences, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, School of Medicine, Quito, Ecuador
- Institute of Biomedical Research (Ibiomed), Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Quito, Ecuador
- Mito-Act Research Consortium, Quito, Ecuador
| | - Henry C Vasconez
- Department of Health Sciences, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, School of Medicine, Quito, Ecuador
- Institute of Biomedical Research (Ibiomed), Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Quito, Ecuador
| | - Andrés Caicedo
- Department of Health Sciences, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, School of Medicine, Quito, Ecuador
- Institute of Biomedical Research (Ibiomed), Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Quito, Ecuador
- School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (Mhens), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Mito-Act Research Consortium, Quito, Ecuador
| | - Antonio W D Gavilanes
- Department of Health Sciences, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, School of Medicine, Quito, Ecuador
- School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (Mhens), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dulak J, Pecyna M. Unproven cell interventions in Poland and the exploitation of European Union law on advanced therapy medicinal products. Stem Cell Reports 2023; 18:1610-1620. [PMID: 37390824 PMCID: PMC10444563 DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2023.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2023] Open
Abstract
The global threat of unproven "stem cell therapies" develops despite the repeated statements of scientific organizations and regulatory agencies warning about the improper rationale, lack of effectiveness, and potential health risks of such commercial activities. Here, this problem is discussed from Poland's perspective, where unjustified "stem cell medical experiments" have raised the concern of responsible scientists and physicians. The paper describes how the European Union law on advanced therapy medicinal products and the hospital exemption rule have been used improperly and unlawfully on a mass scale. The article indicates serious scientific, medical, legal, and social issues of these activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Józef Dulak
- Department of Medical Biotechnology, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
| | - Marlena Pecyna
- Chair of Civil Law, Faculty of Law and Administration, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
de Kanter AFJ, Jongsma KR, Verhaar MC, Bredenoord AL. The Ethical Implications of Tissue Engineering for Regenerative Purposes: A Systematic Review. TISSUE ENGINEERING. PART B, REVIEWS 2023; 29:167-187. [PMID: 36112697 PMCID: PMC10122262 DOI: 10.1089/ten.teb.2022.0033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Tissue Engineering (TE) is a branch of Regenerative Medicine (RM) that combines stem cells and biomaterial scaffolds to create living tissue constructs to restore patients' organs after injury or disease. Over the last decade, emerging technologies such as 3D bioprinting, biofabrication, supramolecular materials, induced pluripotent stem cells, and organoids have entered the field. While this rapidly evolving field is expected to have great therapeutic potential, its development from bench to bedside presents several ethical and societal challenges. To make sure TE will reach its ultimate goal of improving patient welfare, these challenges should be mapped out and evaluated. Therefore, we performed a systematic review of the ethical implications of the development and application of TE for regenerative purposes, as mentioned in the academic literature. A search query in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and PhilPapers yielded 2451 unique articles. After systematic screening, 237 relevant ethical and biomedical articles published between 2008 and 2021 were included in our review. We identified a broad range of ethical implications that could be categorized under 10 themes. Seven themes trace the development from bench to bedside: (1) animal experimentation, (2) handling human tissue, (3) informed consent, (4) therapeutic potential, (5) risk and safety, (6) clinical translation, and (7) societal impact. Three themes represent ethical safeguards relevant to all developmental phases: (8) scientific integrity, (9) regulation, and (10) patient and public involvement. This review reveals that since 2008 a significant body of literature has emerged on how to design clinical trials for TE in a responsible manner. However, several topics remain in need of more attention. These include the acceptability of alternative translational pathways outside clinical trials, soft impacts on society and questions of ownership over engineered tissues. Overall, this overview of the ethical and societal implications of the field will help promote responsible development of new interventions in TE and RM. It can also serve as a valuable resource and educational tool for scientists, engineers, and clinicians in the field by providing an overview of the ethical considerations relevant to their work. Impact statement To our knowledge, this is the first time that the ethical implications of Tissue Engineering (TE) have been reviewed systematically. By gathering existing scholarly work and identifying knowledge gaps, this review facilitates further research into the ethical and societal implications of TE and Regenerative Medicine (RM) and other emerging biomedical technologies. Moreover, it will serve as a valuable resource and educational tool for scientists, engineers, and clinicians in the field by providing an overview of the ethical considerations relevant to their work. As such, our review may promote successful and responsible development of new strategies in TE and RM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Floor J. de Kanter
- Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Karin R. Jongsma
- Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marianne C. Verhaar
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Annelien L. Bredenoord
- Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Erasmus School of Philosophy, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Burns JS. The Art of Stem Cell-Based Therapy. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2023; 1420:1-12. [PMID: 37258780 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-30040-0_1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Potency assays represent crucial experiments at the hub of the comprehensive complexity surrounding cell therapy. Moreover, numerous factors beyond biological and scientific considerations are involved in achieving successful potency assays that fulfil regulatory authority approval for a new advanced therapy medicinal product. Though this can mean a frustratingly long period of discovery and development, progress in cell therapy is nowadays proceeding remarkably quickly, assisted by the potency assay rigorously placing emphasis on the need to critically analyse the key factor/s responsible for the therapeutic mechanism of action. History has shown that it can take many decades for there to be an improved understanding of a mechanism of action. Yet the chasing of precise targets has revolutionised medicine, with no clearer example than approaches to viral pandemics. The centuries involved in the eradication of smallpox have paved the way for an unprecedented pace of vaccine development for the Covid-19 pandemic. Such extraordinary accomplishments foster encouragement that similarly for stem cell-based therapy, our scientific knowledge will continue to improve apace. This chapter focuses on the art of experimentation and discovery, introducing potency assay requisites and numerous factors that can influence potency assay outcomes. A comprehensive understanding of potency assays and their development can hasten the provision of new cell therapies to help resolve burdensome diseases of unmet medical need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge S Burns
- Department of Environmental and Prevention Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
de Jongh D, Massey EK, Cronin AJ, Schermer MHN, Bunnik EM. Early-Phase Clinical Trials of Bio-Artificial Organ Technology: A Systematic Review of Ethical Issues. Transpl Int 2022; 35:10751. [PMID: 36388425 PMCID: PMC9659568 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2022.10751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Regenerative medicine has emerged as a novel alternative solution to organ failure which circumvents the issue of organ shortage. In preclinical research settings bio-artificial organs are being developed. It is anticipated that eventually it will be possible to launch first-in-human transplantation trials to test safety and efficacy in human recipients. In early-phase transplantation trials, however, research participants could be exposed to serious risks, such as toxicity, infections and tumorigenesis. So far, there is no ethical guidance for the safe and responsible design and conduct of early-phase clinical trials of bio-artificial organs. Therefore, research ethics review committees will need to look to related adjacent fields of research, including for example cell-based therapy, for guidance. In this systematic review, we examined the literature on early-phase clinical trials in these adjacent fields and undertook a thematic analysis of relevant ethical points to consider for early-phase clinical trials of transplantable bio-artificial organs. Six themes were identified: cell source, risk-benefit assessment, patient selection, trial design, informed consent, and oversight and accountability. Further empirical research is needed to provide insight in patient perspectives, as this may serve as valuable input in determining the conditions for ethically responsible and acceptable early clinical development of bio-artificial organs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dide de Jongh
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands,Department of Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands,*Correspondence: Dide de Jongh,
| | - Emma K. Massey
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Antonia J. Cronin
- Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom,King’s College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maartje H. N. Schermer
- Department of Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Eline M. Bunnik
- Department of Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|