Impact of lymph node ratio in selecting patients with resected gastric cancer for adjuvant therapy

Lymph Node Ratio as a Predictor of Survival for Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Lymph node ratio is the number of lymph nodes with evidence of metastases on pathological review compared to the total number of lymph nodes harvested during oncologic resection. Lymph node ratio is a proven predictor of long-term survival. These data have not been meta-analyzed to determine the prognosis associated with different lymph node ratio cut-offs in colon cancer.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL were systematically searched. Articles were included if they compared 5-year overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) between different lymph node ratios for patients undergoing oncologic resection for stages I-III colon cancer. Pairwise meta-analyses using inverse variance random effects were performed.

RESULTS

From 2587 citations, nine studies with 97,631 patients (female: 51.9%, median age: 61.65 years) were included. A lymph node ratio above .1 resulted in a 49% decrease in the odds of 5-year OS (2 studies; OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.49-.53, P < .00001). A lymph node ratio above .25 resulted in a 56% decrease in the odds of 5-year OS (3 studies; OR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.43-.45, P < .00001). A lymph node ratio above .5 resulted in a 65% decrease in the odds of 5-year OS (3 studies; OR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.33-.37, P < .00001).

CONCLUSIONS

Lymph node ratios from .1 to .5 are effective predictors of 5-year OS for colon cancer. There appears to be an inverse dose-response relationship between lymph node ratio and 5-year OS. Further study is required to determine whether there is an optimal lymph node ratio cut-off for prognostication and whether it can inform which patients may benefit from more aggressive adjuvant therapy and follow-up protocols.

Positive lymph node ratio as a prognostic factor for gastric cancer patients: Is it going to supersede positive lymph node number in guidelines?

Gastric malignancies constitute the sixth most common cancer with regards to incidence and have the fifth most mortality rates. Extended lymph-node dissection is the surgical modality of choice while treating advanced stage gastric cancer. It is yet a topic of debate, whether or not the amount of positive lymph nodes after a pathological examination following the surgical intervention is of prognostic value. In this study, it is aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of positive lymph nodes following the surgery. A total of 193 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy between January 2011 and December 2015 have been considered for a retrospective data collection. The cases with R1-R2 resections, palliative or emergent surgeries are excluded. Metastatic to total number of lymph nodes, corresponded a ratio which was analyzed in this survey and practiced as a predictive parameter of disease outcome. This survey includes 138 male (71.5%) and 55 female (28.5%) patients treated between 2011 and 2015 in our clinic. The survey follow-up duration of the cases range between 0, 2, and 72 months, corresponding an average of 23.24 ± 16.99 months. We calculated cutoff value of 0.09 with, sensitivity is 76.32% for positive to total number of lymph nodes ratio, whereas specivity applies for 64.10%, positive predictive value for 58% and negative predictive value for 80.6%. Positive lymph node ratio has a prognostic value in terms of predicting the prognosis of the patients with gastric adenocarcinoma following a curative gastrectomy. This might in long term contribute to the prognostic analysis of patients if integrated in the current staging system.

Is there a survival difference between older adult and younger adult patients with locally advanced gastric cancer with the same lymph node ratio?

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to clarify the prognostic value of the pathological lymph node ratio for older adult and younger adult gastric cancer patients and to evaluate whether there is a difference in the survival of patients with the same lymph node ratio (LNR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 222 patients diagnosed with locally advanced gastric cancer who underwent upfront gastrectomy without neoadjuvant chemotherapy and had negative surgical margins were included. The patients were divided into two groups according to age. Clinicopathological properties of the two groups were compared. Potential prognostic factors affecting survival were analyzed. Subsequently, the effect of lymphadenectomy and LNR on survival in both groups was evaluated.

RESULTS

Thirty patients with perioperative mortality were excluded and 192 patients were analyzed. Significant differences were detected in terms of hemoglobin and albumin levels between older adult patients and younger adult patients (p < 0.05). Overall survival (OS) was significantly worse in older adult patients (22 months vs. 67 months, p < 0.001). The survival rates in older adult patients were significantly lower from those of younger adult in the subgroup LNR Stage 2 (12.1% vs. 47.9%, p = 0.004) and LNR Stage 3 classification (9.1% vs. 34.1%, p = 0.039). LNR was found to be significant for OS with a cut-off point of 0.18.

CONCLUSION

A survival difference was found between the older adult and younger adult patients with the same LNR. LNR was found to be an independent factor for survival especially in older adult patients. Survival was found to be further decreased in older adult patients compared to younger adult patients with increasing LNR.

Prognostic value of the nodal ratio in gastric cancer: unicentric analysis of 199 patients

INTRODUCTION

In the gastric cancer the most widely used classification is the AJCC TNM system. However, it presents limitations, such as staging migration in cases with suboptimal lymphadenectomies. The nodal ratio has been proposed as an alternative system, proving to be a good prognostic predictor of survival. The aim was to assess the influence of the nodal ratio measured in tertiles [tNR] as a prognostic factor and compare with the TNM systems (7th ed.) and log odds of positive lymph nodes [LODDS].

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective and single-center study on 199 patients operated on with curative intent between 2010 and 2014. For each system an univariate and multivariate analysis was performed and the overall survival rates [OS] were compared by the ROC test.

RESULTS

The prognostic factors that showed statistical significance in the multivariate analysis were: tRN2 (HR2.87) and tRN3 (HR7.29); LODDS 2 (HR1.55), LODDS3 (HR2.6) and LODDS4 (HR4.9); pN2 (HR1.84) and pN3 (HR2.91). The 5-year OS was 75.8%, 61.4%, 25.8%, and 3.84% for tRN0, tRN1, tRN2 and tRN3; 72.4%, 60%, 29.1% and 13.9% for LODDS1, LODDS2, LODDS3 and LODDS4; and 77.6%, 59.4%, 28.8% and 25.5% for pN0, pN1, pN2 and pN3, respectively. The three systems behaved as good predictors, with areas under the curve >0.75.

CONCLUSION

tNR was an independent prognostic factor for estimating survival in gastric cancer. Furthermore, the ease of its calculation in clinical practice could reduce the effect of staging migration.

Duration of Perioperative Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A "Less Is More" Question When ypN0 Is Achieved

Backgrounds

Perioperative chemotherapy (PEC) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) have become a vital part of locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) treatment, but the optimal duration of PEC has not been studied. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the possibility of duration reduction in PEC in the adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) phase for ypN0 patients.

Methods

We included LAGC patients who achieved ypN0 after NAC in our institution from 2005 to 2018. The risk/benefit of AC and other covariates were majorly measured by overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). We developed a survival-tree-based model to determine the optimal PEC duration for ypN0 patients in different classes.

Results

A total of 267 R0 resection patients were included. There were 55 patients who did not receive AC. The 5-year OS was 74.34% in the non-AC group and 83.64% in the AC group with a significant difference (p = 0.012). Multivariate Cox regression revealed that both AC (AC vs. non-AC: HR, 0.49; 95%CI, 0.27–0.88; p = 0.018) and ypT stages (ypT3-4 vs. ypT0-2: HR, 2.00; 95%CI, 1.11–3.59; p = 0.021) were significant protective/risk factors on patients OS and PFS. A decision tree model for OS indicated an optimal four to six cycles of PEC, which was recommended for ypT0-2N0 patients, while a minimum of five PEC cycles was recommended for ypT3-4N0 patients.

Conclusion

AC treatment is still necessary for ypN0. The duration reduction could be applied for the ypT0-2N0 stage patients but may not be suitable for higher ypT stages and beyond. A multicenter-based study is required.

Lymph Node Evaluation after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients with Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

Adequate lymphadenectomy with at least 16 nodes retrieved at the time of gastrectomy is a quality measure recommended to ensure adequate staging. The minimum nodal retrieval recommended after receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is less defined.

METHODS

Patients with clinical stages 1 to 3 gastric adenocarcinoma who received NACT and surgical resection were identified from the 2004-2015 National Cancer Database. The optimal nodal harvest number was calculated with Cox spline regression modeling. Cohorts with a nodal harvest higher or lower than this number were 1:1 propensity score-matched. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates.

RESULTS

Among 4337 patients receiving NACT, the optimal minimal nodal harvest at gastrectomy was 23 nodes. Compared with the patients who had fewer than 23 nodes retrieved, the patients with at least 23 nodes examined (n = 1073, 24.7%) were more likely to be female (26.1% vs 22%; p = 0.006) and non-white (29.3% vs 18.5%; p < 0.0001), to have a Charlson-Deyo score of 0 (71.5% vs 66.8%; p = 0.005), and to have undergone resection at an academic facility (67.9% vs 51.5%; p < 0.0001). The patients with at least 23 nodes examined had higher proportions of high-grade tumor (62% vs 57.4%; p = 0.030), pT3 or pT4 tumor (56.3% vs 48.7%; p < 0.0001), body tumor (21.3% vs 12.5%; p < 0.0001), or antrum/pylorus tumor (15.3% vs 11.4%; p < 0.0001). The patients with at least 23 nodes were more likely to have lymph node metastases identified (61% vs 51%; p < 0.0001). After matching, the patients with at least 23 nodes (n = 990) demonstrated an improved 5-year OS (57.9% vs 49%; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The extent of lymphadenectomy during gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma should not be reduced after NACT because adequate lymph node retrieval remains important for prognostication.

A nomogram to predict overall survival and disease-free survival after curative-intent gastrectomy for gastric cancer

An individual prediction of DFS and OS may be useful after surgery for gastric cancer to inform patients and to guide the clinical management. Patients who underwent curative-intent resection for gastric cancer between January 2010 and May 2020 at a single Italian institution were identified. Variables associated with OS and DFS were recorded and analysed according to univariable and multivariable Cox models. Nomograms predicting OS and DFS were built according to variables resulting from multivariable Cox models. Discrimination ability was calculated using the Harrell's Concordance Index. Overall, 168 patients underwent curative-intent resection. Nomograms to predict OS were developed including age, tumor size, tumor location, T stage, N stage, M stage and post-operative complications, while nomogram to predict DFS includes Lauren classification, and lymph node ratio (LNR). On internal validation, both nomograms demonstrated a good discrimination with a Harrell's C-index of 0.77 for OS and 0.71 for DFS. The proposed nomogram to predict DFS and OS after curative-intent surgery for gastric cancer showed a good discrimination on internal validation, and may be useful to guide clinician decision-making, as well help identify patients with high-risk of recurrence or with a poor estimated survival.

The Lymph Node Ratio Is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Esophageal Cancer Patients Who Receive Curative Surgery

BACKGROUND/AIM

We investigated the clinical impact of the lymph node ratio (LNR) on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in esophageal cancer patients who underwent curative surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred twenty patients who underwent curative surgery for esophageal cancer between 2005 and 2017 were included in this study. The LNR was defined as the ratio of the number of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) to the total number of harvested LNs.

RESULTS

A lymph node ratio of 10% was regarded as the optimal critical point for classification based on the overall survival rate. The 3-year and 5-year OS rates were 65.5% and 57.0%, respectively, in the LNR<10% group, and 11.8% and 0% in the LNR≥10% group; the difference was statistically significant (p<0.001). The 3-year and 5-year RFS rates were 52.6% and 44.6%, respectively, in the LNR<10% group, and 0% and 0% in the LNR>10% group; the difference was also statistically significant (p<0.001). When comparing the sites of first relapse, the incidence of distant lymph node metastasis in the LNR>10% group was significantly higher than that in the LNR<10% group.

CONCLUSION

The LNR was a risk factor for both OS and RFS in patients who underwent curative surgery for esophageal cancer.

Surgical Management of Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review

Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer worldwide, and it is responsible for 7.7% of all cancer deaths. Despite advances in the field of oncology, where radiotherapy, neo and adjuvant chemotherapy may improve the outcome, the only treatment with curative intent is represented by surgery as part of a multimodal therapy. Two concepts may be adopted in appropriate cases, neoadjuvant treatment before gastrectomy (G) or primary surgical resection followed by chemotherapy. Such an approach, combined with early detection and better screening, has led to a decrease in the overall incidence of gastric cancer. Unfortunately, malignant tumors of the stomach are often diagnosed in locally advanced or metastatic stages when the median overall survival remains poor. Surgical care in these cases must be provided by a multidisciplinary team in a high-volume center. Important surgical aspects such as optimum resection margins, surgical technique, and number of harvested lymph nodes are important factors for patient outcomes. The standardization of surgical treatment of gastric cancer in accordance with the patient’s profile is of decisive importance for a better outcome. This review aims to summarize the current standards in the surgical treatment of gastric cancer.

Prognostic value of the nodal ratio in gastric cancer: Unicentric analysis pf 199 patients

INTRODUCTION

In the gastric cancer the most widely used classification is the AJCC TNM system. However, it presents limitations, such as staging migration in cases with suboptimal lymphadenectomies. The nodal ratio has been proposed as an alternative system, proving to be a good prognostic predictor of survival. The aim was to assess the influence of the nodal ratio measured in tertiles [tNR] as a prognostic factor and compare with the TNM systems (7th ed.) and log odds of positive lymph nodes [LODDS].

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective and single-center study on 199 patients operated on with curative intent between 2010 and 2014. For each system an univariate and multivariate analysis was performed and the overall survival rates [OS] were compared by the ROC test.

RESULTS

The prognostic factors that showed statistical significance in the multivariate analysis were: tNR2 (HR 2.87) and tNR 3 (HR 7.29); LODDS 2 (HR 1.55), LODDS3 (HR 2.6) and LODDS4 (HR 4.9); pN2 (HR 1.84) and pN3 (HR 2.91). The 5-year OS was 75.8, 61.4, 25.8 and 3.84% for tNR0, tNR1, tNR2 and tNR3; 72.4, 60, 29.1 and 13.9% for LODDS1, LODDS2, LODDS3 and LODDS4; and 77.6, 59.4, 28.8 and 25.5% for pN0, pN1, pN2 and pN3, respectively. The three systems behaved as good predictors, with areas under the curve >0.75.

CONCLUSION

tNR was an independent prognostic factor for estimating survival in gastric cancer. Furthermore, the ease of its calculation in clinical practice could reduce the effect of staging migration.

A Novel Approach for Gastric Cancer Staging in Elderly Patients Based on the Lymph Node Ratio

Purpose

To date, no studies have been performed on staging based on the lymph node ratio (LNR) in elderly patients with gastric cancer who may require limited lymph node (LN) dissection due to morbidity and tissue fragility. We aimed to develop a new N staging system using the LNR in elderly patients with gastric cancer.

Materials and Methods

The present study included patients aged over 75 years who underwent curative gastrectomy between January 1989 and December 2018. Clinicopathological data including the number of retrieved and metastatic LNs were collected and the LNR values were obtained (LNR = the number of metastatic LNs/the number of retrieved LNs). Eleven LNR groups with intervals of 0.1 were divided into four stages based on the inflection points at which the hazard ratio (HR) increased. Survival analysis was performed to evaluate the prognostic value of the LNR.

Results

The four LNR stages included LNR0 (n=364), LNR1 (n=128), LNR2 (n=103), and LNR3 (n=10). In the multivariate analysis, both N staging and LNR staging exhibited significant prognostic values for predicting survival outcomes. However, the incremental change in the hazard ratio (HR) between consecutive stages was greater for the LNR staging than for the N staging (HRs: 1.607, 2.758, and 3.675 for N staging; 1.583, 3.514, and 10.261 for LNR staging).

Conclusions

LNR staging is more useful than N staging in predicting the prognosis in elderly patients with gastric cancer and may be used as a complement or alternative to N staging.

Which Lymph Node Staging System Better Predicts Prognosis in Patients With Gastric Carcinoma? A Comparative Study Between 3 Different Lymph Node Classifications for Resected Gastric Cancer in a Western Tertiary Center

INTRODUCTION

Gastric cancer (GC) is an aggressive disease with high mortality rates. Lymph node (LN) staging of GC is a major source of controversy. The aim of this study is to compare the prognostic value of 3 different LN classifications for patients with resected GC: the eighth TNM staging system, lymph node ratio (LNR, ratio between positive and total LN) and a new anatomic-based classification (Choi classification).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study of all cases of GC resected in a tertiary hospital in Spain (n=377). Clinical data were collected; histologic slides were reviewed; and univariate and multivariate analyses of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were performed.

RESULTS

In all, 315 patients fulfilled inclusion criteria. Univariate analysis showed that all classifications were significantly associated with tumor death and progression (P<0.001). All staging systems were independent prognostic factors for DFS. Area under the curve ratios for Choi, N stage, and LNR classifications were 0.738, 0.730, and 0.735, respectively. TNM and LNR classifications were independent prognosticators for OS, while Choi classification was an independent factor only in patients with ≥16 LN resected. Area under the curve ratios for Choi, N stage, and LNR classifications were 0.707, 0.728, and 0.732, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves depending on LNR classification showed the best patient stratification for both OS and DFS.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3-staging systems had similar prognostic performance, but LNR-based classification stratified patients better. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of the number of LN examined, cutoff values, and anatomic extent of LN disease in GC.

Impact of Surgical Margin Status on Survival in Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

It is inconclusive whether R1 margin determined by postoperative pathological examination indicates worse long-term survival in gastric cancer (GC) patients after curative intent resection (CIR). Hence, we aimed to systematically pool the conflicting evidence to fill this gap.

METHODS

The present study was performed according to the published protocol and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Published studies examining the impact of microscopic margin status on overall survival (OS) and 5-year OS rate in GC were systematically searched in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. RevMan 5.3 was used to conduct statistical analysis, and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach was used to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome.

RESULTS

Twenty-three retrospective cohort studies including 19 992 patients were analyzed. The pooled hazard ratio for OS of 14 studies was 2.06 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.61-2.65, low certainty), indicating that R1 margin predicted inferior OS. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses upheld the statistical stability of this finding. The pooled odds ratio (OR) of 14 studies was .21 (95% CI: .17-.26, moderate certainty), demonstrating that the presence of R1 margins was associated with a poorer 5-year OS rate. Sensitivity analyses and most of the subgroup analyses confirmed this finding, except the "esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancers" subgroup, which included two studies with a pooled OR of .41 (95% CI: .10-1.61).

CONCLUSION

R1 margin detected by pathological examination might exhibit a high correlation with poorer OS and 5-year OS rate in GC (except EGJ cancers) patients who underwent CIR. To figure out the effect of R1 margin on survival of different stages and histological types need prospective studies with large sample sizes and standardized methods. What is the best treatment for R1 margin patients also need more in-depth and special research.

Cancer cells invasion to the gastric bare area adipose tissue: a poor prognostic predictor for gastric cancer

Background

The relationship between gastric bare area adipose tissues invasion (GBAI) confirmed pathologically and the prognosis of gastric cancer (GC) patients is undefined. Till present, there has not been literature investigating this phenomenon. Here, we aimed at analyzing the implication of GBAI in GC.

Methods

The data of 1822 patients who underwent radical surgery between January 2000 and December 2013 at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were retrieved. Pathologically, tumor deposits (TDs) located > 5 mm from the leading edge of the primary tumor and the lymph nodes (LNs) station number 1, 2, 7, and 9 were considered GBAI. Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox’s proportional hazards model were employed to analyze.

Results

Two hundred and five (11.3%) patients were pathologically diagnosed with GBAI, which was more commonly found in proximal or linitis lastica than distal GC (P < 0.001). There was significant difference in 5-year survival between patients with and without GBAI for stages IIB, IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC, respectively (P < 0.009 for IIB, IIIA, and IIIB; P = 0.021 for IIIC). Among the 205 GBAI patients, 61 had detailed radiological follow-up data in which 26 (34.7%) were found to have retroperitoneal infiltration, 27 (36.0%) had peritoneal metastasis, 10 (13.3%) had hematogenous metastasis, 16 (21.3%) had lymphatic metastasis, and 16 (21.3%) had others.

Conclusions

GBAI was identified as a predictor of unfavorable prognosis for GC and was more commonly found in the proximal or linitis plastica of the stomach than in distal stomach. Retroperitoneal infiltration was one of the most commonly identified metastatic route for GC associated with GBAI after radical surgery.

Impact of surgical margin status on the survival outcome after surgical resection of gastric cancer: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Generally, complete resection with cancer cell negative (R0) margin has been accepted as the most effective treatment of gastric cancer and positive resection (R1/R2) margin has been associated with decreased survival to varied degrees. However, the independent impact of microscopical positive (R1) margin on long-term survival may be confounded. No meta-analysis has worked at the association between R1 margin and outcomes of gastric cancer and the available evidence are scant. Therefore, we plan to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantitatively explore the role of R1 margin on gastric (including oesophagogastric junction) cancer survival after curative intent resection.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The protocol was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guideline. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases will be performed from their inceptions to 30 April 2020 to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies and case-control studies focusing on the impact of R1 margin on survival of gastric cancer after curative intent resection. The primary outcome will be the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) and the secondary outcomes will be 5-year OS rate and 5-year DFS rate. The Cochrane tool for bias assessment in randomised trials and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies-I for the assessment of bias in non-randomised studies (NRS) will be used. Statistical heterogeneity will be assessed by visual inspection of forest plots and measured using the I2 statistics. A fixed-effect model will be used when heterogeneity is low, otherwise, a random-effect model will be chosen. Publication bias will be assessed by funnel plots, subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis will be performed in the right context. For each outcome, we will perform data synthesis separately for RCTs and NRS using Rev Man V.5.3 software and compile 'summary of findings' tables separately for RCTs and NRS using GRADEpro software. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations considerations will also be used to make an overall assessment of the quality of evidence.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

There is no requirement for ethics approval because no patient data will be collected at an individual level in this systematic review and meta-analysis.The results of this systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences, any deviations from the protocol will be clearly documented and explained in its final report.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020165110.

LncRNA HOTAIR promotes the growth and metastasis of gastric cancer by sponging miR-1277-5p and upregulating COL5A1

BACKGROUND

Emerging studies have shown that HOTAIR acts as an oncogene in gastric cancer (GC). However, its role in the extracellular matrix and in tumor immune infiltration remains unknown.

METHODS

HOTAIR and COL5A1 levels were analyzed by bioinformatics analysis and validated by qRT-PCR, western blotting and immunohistochemistry assays. The regulatory relationships between components of the HOTAIR/miR-1277-5p/COL5A1 axis and the role of this axis in GC were predicted by bioinformatics analysis, and validated by in vitro and in vivo experiments. The correlation between COL5A1 and GC immune infiltration was assessed by bioinformatics analysis and a COL5A1-based predictive nomogram was established using the Stomach Adenocarcinoma dataset from The Cancer Genome Atlas.

RESULTS

We found that HOTAIR and COL5A1 were overexpressed in GC compared to normal controls, which predicted poor prognosis. The regulatory relationship of the HOTAIR/miR-1277-5p/COL5A1 axis in GC was demonstrated, and HOTAIR and COL5A1 were found to promote GC growth while miR-1277-5p exerted the reverse effects. In addition, COL5A1 was negatively associated with tumor purity but positively associated with immune infiltration, which suggested that COL5A1-mediated GC growth may be partially mediated by the regulation of immune infiltration. Additionally, the established COL5A1-based nomogram showed that COL5A1 can serve as a prognostic biomarker in GC.

CONCLUSIONS

HOTAIR regulates GC growth by sponging miR-1277-5p and upregulating COL5A1, and COL5A1-mediated GC cell proliferation may be mediated by effects on the tumor microenvironment, which provides novel targets for GC treatment.

Study of Survival in Gastric Cancer with Emphasis on Lymph Node Status as an Independent Prognostic Factor

Background: Lymph node status in gastric cancer is known as an independent prognostic factor that guides the surgical and oncological treatment and independently influences long-term survival. Several studies suggest that the lymph node ratio has a greater importance in survival than the number of metastatic lymph nodes.

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and morphological factors that can influence the survival of gastric cancer patients, with an emphasis on nodal status and the lymph node ratio.

Material and methods: We conducted a retrospective study in which 303 patients with gastric cancer admitted to the Department of Surgery of the Mureș County Hospital between 2008 and 2018 were screened for study enrolment. Data were obtained from the records of the department and from the histopathological reports. The examined variables included: age, gender, tumor localization, T stage, histological type, grade of differentiation, surgical procedure, lympho-vascular invasion, excised lymph nodes, metastatic lymph nodes, lymph node ratio. After screening, the study included a total number of 100 patients, for which follow-up data was available.

Results: The mean age of the study population was 66.43 ± 10 years, and 71% were males. The average survival period was 21.42 months. Statistical analysis showed that the localization of the tumor (p = 0.021), vascular invasion (p ---lt---0.001), T (p = 0.004) and N (p ---lt---0.001) stages, type of surgery (partial gastrectomy 59% vs. total gastrectomy 41%, p = 0.005), as well as the lymph node ratio (p ---lt---0.001) were prognostic factors for survival in patients with gastric cancer undergoing surgical therapy.

Conclusions: The survival of gastric cancer patients is significantly influenced by tumor localization, T stage, vascular invasion, type of surgery, N stage and the lymph node ratio based on univariate analysis. Also, the lymph node ratio proved to be an independent prognostic factor for survival.

Positive node-ratio in curative-intent treatment for gastric cancer is a strong independent prognostic factor for 5-year overall survival

INTRODUCTION

This study addressed whether the positive node-ratio (N-ratio) for patients who underwent curative-intent treatment was an independent prognostic factor of overall survival (OS) for gastric adenocarcinoma (GA).

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent gastrectomy for GA with at least 15 harvested nodes were evaluated for 5-year OS. The best threshold was determined using the area under an receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Univariate and multivariate models were assessed looking for independent prognostic factors for OS.

RESULTS

From 1994 to 2015, 398 consecutive patients were evaluated. The N-ratio ≥11% had an accuracy of 0.764, the sensitivity of 71.1%, the specificity of 81.7%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 91.7%, and odds ratio (OR) of 11. After multivariate analysis for OS, age ≥70 years (HR 1.44), need for total gastrectomy (HR 1.45), need for extended resection (HR 1.7), and N-ratio ≥11% (HR 3.7) were unfavorable prognostic factors. D2 lymphadenectomy (HR 0.53) was a protective factor. The median OS according to N-ratio was 14 months for N-ratio >11 vs 58 months for N-ratio <11%.

CONCLUSION

The N-ratio ≥11% was an independent negative prognostic factor for patients who underwent treatment for GA with curative intent. The N-ratio ≥11% presented high specificity, high PPV and high OR for risk of death for 5 years after surgery.

Construction of a nomogram for the prediction of prognosis in patients with resectable gastric cancer undergoing fewer than sixteen lymph node biopsies

Background

Lymph node metastases evaluation is important for assessing gastric cancer prognosis. In patients not undergoing adequate lymph node biopsy, lymph node stage migration occurs with the use of the existing staging system. This study established a prediction model to improve prognostication in patients undergoing fewer than 16 lymph nodes biopsy.

Patients and methods

In total, 3036 eligible patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database were evaluated. They were randomized into development and validation sets in a 1:1 ratio (n=1520 and 1516, respectively). To avoid model overfitting and loss of important factors, prognostic factors related to overall survival (OS) were screened according to the Akaike information criterion. The nomogram was assessed using discrimination and consistency tests in the development and validation sets; the concordance index (C-index), calibration curves, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were also evaluated. Comparison with the 7th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system was based on Kaplan–Meier curves, ROC, risk stratification, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

Age, race, degree of differentiation, invasion depth, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and lymph node ratio were independent prognostic factors in OS. C-indices of the development and validation sets were 0.759 (95% CI: 0.741–0.777) and 0.742 (95% CI: 0.713–0.771), respectively; calibration curves were approximately 45° diagonal, indicating good predictive ability of the nomogram. In contrast to the 7th AJCC staging system, the Kaplan–Meier curves and risk stratification of the nomogram had better discrimination ability, the ROC curves of the nomogram achieved more predictive accuracy, and the DCA indicated that the nomogram conferred higher net benefit.

Conclusion

Our constructed nomogram predicts the prognosis of patients with resectable gastric cancer undergoing biopsy of fewer than 16 lymph nodes more precisely and has better clinical applicability than the 7th AJCC staging system.

Lymph node ratio, an independent prognostic factor for patients with stage II-III rectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Identification of the proper surgical method and the most reliable prognostic parameters of rectal carcinomas is a challenging issue. The aim of this paper was to determine the possible prognostic role of the number of harvested lymph nodes versus lymph node ratio (LNR) in patients with rectal carcinomas, and the proper value of LNR that can be used as prognostic parameter.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was performed in 186 consecutive patients with rectal carcinomas that underwent surgical resection. The LNR was calculated for cases from stage II-III, and was correlated with classic prognostic parameters and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A statistically significant difference was found between LNR of 0.15 and OS (p = 0.03), respectively LNR > 0.15 and TNM stage (p < 0.0001), but also tumor infiltration level (p < 0.05). The number of harvested lymph nodes was not correlated with the tumor stage (r = 0.148, p = 0.06) and this parameter did not influence the OS, when the number of 12 or 14 lymph nodes was used as the ideal value (p = 0.6 and p = 0.66, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In patients with rectal carcinomas that underwent preoperative chemoradiotherapy, a LNR of 0.15 is a parameter with independent prognostic value, comparing with the number of harvested lymph nodes. The specific LNR should be calculated in larger cohorts.

The prognostic value of lymph node ratio for local advanced gastric cancer patients with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after D2 gastrectomy

This study aimed to find the prognostic factors of local advanced gastric cancer patients with adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy after radical D2 gastrectomy, and explore the prognostic value of lymph node ratio (LNR).We retrospectively analyzed 164 gastric cancer patients enrolled in West China Hospital from 2006 to 2013, who underwent D2 radical gastrectomy and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. With univariate analysis and the Cox regression model, we evaluated the association of LNR and other clinical pathological characteristics with overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) of patients.Of 164 gastric cancer patients, the median age at diagnosis was 60 (IQR 51-66), with 121 males (73.78%) and 43 females (26.22%). The median follow-up time was 41.5 months. One-year and 3-year OS rate of the whole cohort was 97.6% and 88.4%, with 1-year RFS rate of 90.2% and 3-year RFS rate of 76.8%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, we found that age >60years (P = .025), TNM stage III (P = .014), LNR >0.25 (P = .006) and radiation dose <45Gy (P = .048) predicted worse OS. Further multivariate analysis indicated that age >60y (HR 2.375, 95% CI 1.100-5.128; P = .028), TNM stage III (HR 7.692, 95% CI 1.009-58.824; P = .049) and LNR >0.25 (HR 2.439, 95% CI 1.075-5.525; P = .033) were independent prognostic factors for unfavorable OS. The COX analysis showed that related prognostic factors of worse RFS were TNM stage III (HR 3.802, 95% CI 1.506-9.615; P = .049) and LNR >0.25 (HR 2.326, 95% CI 1.332-4.065; P = .003).LNR can be used as an important prognostic indicator for gastric cancer patients with D2 resection and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and LNR more than 0.25 indicates poor prognosis.

Crosstalk between prognostic long noncoding RNAs and messenger RNAs as transcriptional hallmarks in gastric cancer

AIM

Our study investigated the significance of the crosstalk between long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) and mRNAs in gastric cancer (GC).

METHODS

lncRNA and mRNA expression profiling data in 671 GC tumors and 77 nontumorous gastric tissues were retrieved from the gene expression omnibus database: GSE54129, GSE13911, GSE19826, GSE79973, GSE15459 and GSE66229. Differentially expressed analysis, RNA coexpression network construction, gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses were conducted in this study.

RESULTS

Using differentially expressed and prognostic lncRNAs or mRNAs in GC, we constructed the lncRNA-mRNA coexpression networks. This network involved with vital GO and KEGG pathways.

CONCLUSION

Our study reveals coexpressed lncRNAs and mRNAs as transcriptional hallmarks in GC patients which provide interesting information regarding the incidence and outcome of GC.

Prognostic value of fibrosis ratio in metastatic lymph nodes of node-positive advanced gastric cancer

Lymph node metastasis plays a crucial role in predicting prognosis in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). In the present study, we formulated a fibrosis ratio (FR), defined as the number of metastatic lymph nodes with fibrosis divided by the total number of lymph nodes, and sought to determine whether it can be used to predict the prognosis of patients with AGC and improve on existing node staging. We retrospectively analyzed 161 patients who underwent curative resection for node-positive AGC between 2001 and 2010, evaluating the association between FR, lymph node ratio (LNR), and micrometastasis, and the relationship between FR and clinicopathologic findings, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). A high FR was significantly related to T stage (P < .001), N stage (P < .001), tumor stage (P < .001), lymphatic invasion (P < .001), and venous invasion (P = .007). FR was significantly correlated with an increased number of metastatic lymph nodes (P = .001, R = 0.869) and LNR (P = .001, R = 0.943), but not with total harvested lymph nodes. Patients with micrometastases had a lower FR, compared with those without micrometastases (P < .001). A survival analysis showed poor OS for patients in the entire cohort (P < .001); N1 (P = .002), N2 (P = .004), N3a (P = .010), and N3b (P = .003) stages; and groups with high LNR (P = .013) and low LNR (P = .001). DFS was also poor for the entire cohort (P < .001) and the N2 (P = .013), N3b (P = .002), high-LNR (P = .036), and low-LNR (P = .001) groups, but not the N1 or N3a group. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that high FR was an independent prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.780; CI, 1.655-4.670; P < .001) and DFS (HR, 2.051; CI, 1.199-3.508; P = .009) in AGC. Collectively, our findings indicate that high FR is associated with adverse clinicopathologic parameters in AGC, clearly establishing nodal fibrosis as a pathological finding with value in predicting poor prognosis of patients with AGC. Thus, combining current N stage and LNR diagnostics with FR could improve prognostic prediction in AGC.