National variation in opioid prescribing after pediatric umbilical hernia repair

Comparing Provider and Adolescent Estimates of Postoperative Opioid Use

INTRODUCTION

Most adolescents report unused opioids after surgery. Current interventions compare opioid prescribing between surgeons without capturing actual patient-reported use.

METHODS

We recruited pediatric surgery residents, fellows, advanced practitioners, and surgeons from four surgical divisions at a tertiary care children's hospital. Providers reviewed clinical vignettes based on adolescent-reported postoperative opioid use data from our institution. Afterward, providers were asked to select the number of opioid pills they would prescribe and compare their responses to adolescent-reported use. We then measured provider willingness to change prescribing practices based on this comparison.

RESULTS

Overall, provider response rate was 41.3% (N = 38/92). Providers underestimated the number of opioids used for posterior spinal fusion, open pectus excavatum repair, open pectus carinatum repair, knee arthroscopy, and tonsillectomy and overestimated opioid use following hip reconstruction. Differences in median postoperative opioid use estimates from providers versus adolescent-reported use were significant for knee arthroscopy (10 interquartile range [IQR, 0-3] versus 3 IQR [1.5-13]; P < 0.001) and tonsillectomy (0 IQR [0-2.5] versus 1 IQR [0-7]; P = 0.043). Overall, general pediatric surgery providers underestimated opioid use while orthopedic and cardiothoracic providers overestimated opioid use. Differences between provider specialty were significant for posterior spinal fusion (P = 0.022), knee arthroscopy (P < 0.001), and tonsillectomy (P = 0.005). The number of opioids prescribed varied by provider role and 88.9% of providers (N = 32/36) reported that they would change prescribing habits based on adolescent reports.

CONCLUSIONS

There are differences in provider estimates of postoperative prescription opioid use versus adolescent-reported use. Fortunately, providers report a willingness to change prescribing practice based on these differences. Feedback incorporating patient-reported postoperative opioid use may be a more accurate and patient-centered way to decrease excess opioid prescribing.

Opioid Utilization After Scoliosis Surgery is Greater in Marfan Syndrome Than Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective matched case cohort.

OBJECTIVE

Compare postoperative opioid utilization and prescribing behaviors between patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS) and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) after posterior spinal fusion (PSF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Opioids are an essential component of pain management after PSF. However, due to the potential for opioid use disorder and dependence, current analgesic strategies aim to minimize their use, especially in younger patients. Limited information exists on opioid utilization after PSF for syndromic scoliosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty adolescents undergoing PSF with MFS were matched with patients with AIS (ratio, 1:2) by age, sex, degree of spinal deformity, and the number of vertebral levels fused. Inpatient and outpatient pharmaceutical data were reviewed for the quantity and duration of opioid and adjunct medications. Prescriptions were converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) using CDC's standard conversion factor.

RESULTS

Compared with patients with AIS, patients with MFS had significantly greater total inpatient MME use (4.9 vs . 2.1 mg/kg, P ≤ 0.001) and longer duration of intravenous patient-controlled anesthesia (3.4 vs . 2.5 d, P = 0.001). Within the first 2 postop days, MFS patients had more patient-controlled anesthesia boluses (91 vs . 52 boluses, P = 0.01) despite similar pain scores and greater use of adjunct medications. After accounting for prior opioid use, MFS was the only significant predictor of requesting an opioid prescription after discharge (odds ratio: 4.1, 95% CI: 1.1-14.9, P = 0.03). Patients with MFS were also more likely to be discharged with a more potent prescription (1.0 vs . 0.72 MME per day/kg, P ≤ 0.001) and to receive a longer-duration prescription (13 vs . 8 d, P = 0.005) with a greater MME/kg (11.6 vs . 5.6 mg/kg, P ≤ 0.001) as outpatients.

CONCLUSION

Despite a similar intervention, patients with MFS and AIS seem to differ in their postoperative opioid usage after PSF, presenting an opportunity for further research to assist clinicians in better anticipating the analgesic needs of individual patients, particularly in light of the ongoing opioid epidemic.

Opioid Utilization after Cardiac Surgery in the Pediatric Medicaid-Insured Population

OBJECTIVE

To determine the variation of outpatient opioid prescribing across the US in postoperative pediatric cardiac patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective, cross-sectional study using a concatenated database of Medicaid claims between from 2016 through 2018 of children 0-17 years, discharged after cardiac surgery and receiving an opioid prescription within 30 days. Filled prescriptions were identified and converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Use, duration, and dose were analyzed by sex, race, ethnicity, residence urbanicity, and region.

RESULTS

Among 17 186 Medicaid-enrolled children after cardiac surgery, 2129 received opioids within 30 days of discharge. Females received lower doses than males (coefficient -0.17, P = .022). Hispanic individuals were less likely to receive opioids (coefficient 0.53, P < .05, 95% CI: 0.38-0.71) and for shorter periods (coefficient 0.83, P < .001). Midwest (MW) (OR 0.61, 95% P-values < 0.05, 95% CI: 0.46-0.80) and Northeast (NE) (OR 0.43, 95% P-values < 0.05, 95% CI: 0.30-0.61) regions were less likely to receive opioids but used higher doses compared with the Southeast (SE) (MW coefficient 0.41, Southwest (SW) coefficient 0.18, NE coefficient 0.32, West (W) coefficient 0.19, P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

There were significant variations in opioid prescribing after cardiac surgery by race, ethnicity, sex, and region. National guidelines for outpatient use of opioids in children after cardiac surgery may help limit practice variation and reduce potential harms in outpatient opioid usage.

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Pain Management After Ambulatory Pediatric General and Urologic Surgery

BACKGROUND

Many studies evaluating opioid stewardship interventions' effects on postoperative pain rely on emergency department (ED) visits or readmissions, but patient-reported pain scores represent a more complete picture of the postoperative experience. This study compares patient-reported pain scores after ambulatory pediatric and urologic procedures and the effect of an opioid stewardship intervention that nearly eliminated the use of outpatient narcotics.

METHODS

This is a retrospective comparative study including 3173 pediatric patients who underwent ambulatory procedures from 2015 to 2019, during which there was an intervention to reduce narcotic prescriptions. Postoperative day one phone calls assessed pain levels using a four-point scale (no pain, mild pain, moderate pain controlled with medication, or severe pain uncontrolled with medication). We quantified the proportion of patients prescribed opioids pre-versus post-intervention and compared pain scores for patients receiving opioid versus non-opioid regimens.

RESULTS

Opioid prescription rates demonstrated a 6.5-fold reduction after opioid stewardship efforts. The majority of patients (2838) received non-opioids, with only 335 patients receiving opioids. Opioid patients reported moderate/severe pain slightly more than non-opioid patients (14.1% vs. 10.4%, p = 0.04). On by-procedure analyses, there were no subgroups in which non-opioid patients reported significantly higher pain scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-opioid postoperative pain regimens appear to be effective, with only 10.4% of patients reporting moderate/severe pain after ambulatory procedures. Future studies assessing patient-reported outcomes are necessary to optimize pain control for all patients and to determine whether there is ever an indication for opioid prescription after ambulatory general pediatric or urologic surgery.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective comparative study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Clinical and Demographic Factors Associated with Receiving an Opioid Prescription following Admission to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Opioids are commonly used to treat pain in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), and many children receive opioid prescription(s) at discharge. The frequency of opioid prescriptions at discharge and associations with individual characteristics and clinical factors are unknown. This study aimed to identify (1) the number of children who receive an opioid prescription at PICU discharge and (2) the demographic and clinical factors associated with receiving an opioid prescription. Data were collected via the electronic medical record. The sample was 3345 children (birth to 18 years) admitted to the PICU and discharged to home or an inpatient rehabilitation setting. In total, 23.7% of children were prescribed an opioid at discharge. There were group differences in who received opioid prescriptions (yes/no) related to PICU diagnosis, length of hospital stay, number of days on mechanical ventilation, number of previous hospitalizations, organ dysfunction score, and admission type (surgical versus non-surgical). Binary logistic regression models examined predictors of opioid prescription at discharge for the total sample and diagnostic subgroups. Older age and surgical admission type were the most consistent predictors of receiving an opioid prescription. Future research should examine prescription usage patterns and how use of opioids is associated with pain and functional outcomes over time.

Postoperative Opioid Prescribing, Use, and Disposal in Children

This article provides an overview of postoperative opioid prescribing, use, and disposal patterns in children and also identifies gaps in knowledge and areas for improvement. We present evidence that there is a need to tailor prescriptions to specific procedures to reduce the number of excess, unused prescription opioid pills in the home. We also explain the need to provide culturally competent care when managing a child's pain after surgery. Finally, we discuss the need for widespread provider and caregiver education about safe prescription opioid use, storage, and disposal.

Trends in opioid and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) usage in children undergoing common urinary tract reconstruction: A large, single-institutional analysis

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

Opioid stewardship is recognized as a critical clinical priority. We previously reported marked reductions in narcotic administration after implementation of an opioid reduction protocol for pediatric ambulatory urologic surgery. We hypothesize that a decrease in post-operative and discharge opioid administration will not increase short-term adverse events.

STUDY DESIGN

All pediatric patients undergoing open or robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty or ureteral reimplantation between 2015 and 2019 were included. Patients' demographics, opioid and NSAID administration, urology or pain-related emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, and reoperations within 30 days of surgery, were aggregated.

RESULTS

438 patients, with a median age of 3.5 years (IQR 1.5-8.3) at the time of surgery, met the inclusion criteria. Annual rates of inpatient opioid administration and prescriptions decreased significantly over the study period, while rates of intra-operative, inpatient, and prescribed NSAIDs significantly increased. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of ED visits, readmissions, or reoperations within 30 days of surgery between patients who received an opioid prescription and those who did not. Multivariate regression showed that patients who did not receive an opioid prescription at discharge were found to be at a lower risk for unplanned encounters including ED visits, readmissions, or reoperations (OR:0.5, 95%CI: 0.2-0.9, p = 0.04).

DISCUSSION

The present study shows the decreasing trend in inpatient opioid administration and opioid prescription after discharge, when accompanied by an increase NSAID administration, does not result in a significant change in rates of unplanned encounters and complications, similar to results from previous studies on non-urological and ambulatory urological surgeries.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-opioid pain control after major pediatric urologic reconstruction is safe and effective. We found that a reduction in opioid administration can be associated with a reduced risk of unplanned ED visits, readmissions, or reoperations. Further investigations are required to corroborate this finding.

Variability in opioid pain medication prescribing for adolescent trauma patients in a sample of US pediatric trauma centers

Objectives

The primary objective of this study was to examine opioid prescription frequency and identify differences across a national cohort of pediatric trauma centers in rates of prescribing opioids to injured adolescents at discharge.

Methods

This was a retrospective observational study using electronic health records of injured adolescents (12-17 years) admitted to one of 10 pediatric trauma centers.

Results

Of the 1345 electronic health records abstracted, 720 (53.5%, 95% CI 50.8 to 56.2) patients received opioid prescriptions at discharge with variability across sites (28.6%-72%). There was no association between patient factors and frequency of prescribing opioids. Center's trauma volume was significantly positively correlated with a higher rate of opioid prescribing at discharge (r=0.92, p=0.001). There was no significant difference between the frequency of opioid prescriptions at discharge among alcohol and other drugs (AOD)-positive patients (53.8%) compared with AOD-negative patients (53.5%).

Conclusions

Across a sample of 10 pediatric trauma centers, just over half of adolescent trauma patients received an opioid prescription at discharge. Prescribing rates were similar for adolescent patients screening positive for AOD use and those screening negative. The only factor associated with a higher frequency of prescribing was trauma center volume. Consensus and dissemination of outpatient pain management best practices for adolescent trauma patients is warranted.

Level of evidence

III-prognostic.

Trial registration number

NCT03297060.

Variability and Excess in Opioid Prescribing Patterns After Cleft and Craniosynostosis Repairs

OBJECTIVE

To critically analyze pediatric opioid prescription patterns after cleft and craniosynostosis repairs.

DESIGN

Observational study 1) retrospectively reviewing pediatric opioid prescriptions from July 2018 to June 2019 and 2) prospectively surveying patients about actual opioid use from August 2019 to February 2020.

SETTING

Academic tertiary care pediatric hospital.

PATIENTS

133 pediatric patients undergoing cleft lip and/or palate or craniosynostosis repairs. Prospective surveys were offered at postoperative visits; 45 of 69 eligible patients were enrolled.

INTERVENTION

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Opioid doses prescribed at discharge and actual home opioid use.

RESULTS

90 patients with cleft lip and/or palate and 43 patients with craniosynostosis were included. Median prescribed opioid doses were 10.3 for cleft lip and/or palate procedures (range 0-75), and 14.3 for craniosynostosis repairs (range 0-50). In patients with cleft lip and/or palate, there was a negative correlation between age at surgery and prescribed opioid doses (r_s  =  -0.228, p  =  0.031). 45 patients completed surveys of home opioid use. No patients used more than 10 doses. Forty percent used no opioids at home, 33% used 1 to 2 doses, 18% used 3 to 5 doses, and 9% used 6 to 10 doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Opioid prescriptions vary widely after common craniofacial procedures. Younger patients with cleft lip and/or palate may be more likely to be prescribed more doses. Actual home opioid use is less than prescribed amounts, with most patients using five or fewer doses. A prescribing guideline is proposed.

Tiered Guidelines in a Pediatric Orthopaedic Practice Reduce Opioids Prescribed at Discharge

BACKGROUND

Data regarding opioid prescribing patterns following pediatric orthopaedic procedures is limited. The aim of this work was to evaluate the effects of tiered guidelines for discharge opioid prescriptions following common pediatric orthopaedic procedures.

METHODS

Quality improvement project conducted at a single academic institution. Guidelines for discharge opioid prescriptions were implemented January 2018 and established 4 tiers of increasing invasiveness for 28 common pediatric orthopaedic procedures. Patients who underwent these procedures in 2017 comprised the preguideline cohort (N=258), while patients treated in 2019 comprised the postguideline cohort (N=212). Opioid prescriptions were reported as oral morphine equivalents (OMEs). Univariate tests were performed to assess statistically significant differences before and after implementation of the guidelines.

RESULTS

There was a significant decrease in OME prescribed between preguideline and postguideline cohorts (median OME 97.5 vs. 37.5). When analyzed according to procedure tiers, tiers 1, 2, and 4 showed significant decreases in OME prescribed between 2017 and 2019. The rate of no opioids prescribed at discharge increased from 13% to 23% between preguideline and postguideline cohorts. The 30-day refill rate did not significantly change. After implementation of guidelines, 91% of all prescriptions were within the guideline parameters, and there was a significant reduction in prescription variability. In tier 4 procedures, median OME prescribed decreased from 375 preguideline to 188 postguideline, but was associated with greater opioid refills within 30 days of discharge (10.2% preguideline vs. 28.8% postguideline).

CONCLUSIONS

Tiered guidelines for discharge opioid prescriptions following pediatric orthopaedic procedures can significantly decrease the quantity of opioids prescribed. Furthermore, we noted excellent adherence and no overall increase in the rates of narcotic refills. Such guidelines may improve pediatric orthopaedists' ability to responsibly treat postoperative pain while limiting the distribution of unneeded opioids.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-quality improvement project.

Variability in discharge opioid prescribing practices for children: a historical cohort study

PURPOSE

Legitimate opioid prescriptions can increase the risk of misuse, addiction, and overdose of opioids in children and adolescents. This study aimed to describe the prescribing patterns of discharge opioid analgesics following inpatient visits and to determine patient and prescriber characteristics that are associated with prolonged opioid prescription.

METHODS

In a historical cohort study, we identified patients discharged from hospital with an opioid analgesic prescription in a tertiary pediatric hospital from 1 January 2016 to 30 June 2017. The primary outcome was the duration of opioid prescription in number of days. We assessed the association between patient and prescriber characteristics and an opioid prescription duration > five days using a generalized estimating equation to account for clustering due to repeated admissions of the same patient.

RESULTS

During the 18-month study period, 15.4% of all admitted patients (3,787/24,571) were given a total of 3,870 opioid prescriptions at discharge. The median [interquartile range] prescribed duration of outpatient opioid therapy was 3.75 [3.00-5.00] days. Seventy-seven percent of the opioid prescriptions were for five days or less. Generalized estimating equation analysis revealed that hospital stay > four days, oxycodone prescription, and prescription by clinical fellows and the orthopedics service were all independently associated with a discharge opioid prescription of > five days.

CONCLUSIONS

Most discharge opioids for children were prescribed for less than five days, consistent with current guidelines for adults. Nevertheless, the dosage and duration of opioids prescribed at discharge varied widely.

Associations between preoperative depression and opioid use after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and concomitant procedures

Objectives: To determine rates of perioperative opioid use and characterize associations between preoperative depression and chronic and cumulative opioid consumption after ACL reconstruction.Methods: Using insurance claims data, we identified 48,657 adults who underwent ACL reconstruction from 2010 to 2015, had prescription drug insurance, and had ≥1 year of continuous insurance enrollment postoperatively. Chronic opioid use was defined as filling ≥120 days' supply from 3 to 12 months postoperatively. Logistic and linear regression, controlled for age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index value, were used to determine associations of preoperative depression with binary and continuous outcomes, respectively.Results: Preoperatively, 2,237 patients (4.6%) had depression and 2,387 (4.9%) were taking opioids; patients with depression had 6.5 times the odds (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.8, 7.3) of taking opioids than patients without depression. Postoperatively, 25% of the patients filled ≥1 opioid prescription; mean duration of use was 13 ± 11 days, and 362 patients (0.7%) had chronic use. Patients with preoperative depression were less likely than patients without depression to fill an opioid prescription postoperatively (OR 0.2, 95% CI: 0.2, 0.2). Of patients who filled opioid prescriptions postoperatively, those with preoperative depression were more likely to refill that prescription at least once (OR 2.0, 95% CI: 1.9, 2.2) but did not have greater odds of chronic use (OR 0.9, 95% CI: 0.5, 1.5). Preoperative depression was not associated with greater cumulative opioid consumption from 3 to 12 months postoperatively (β = -40, 95% CI: -226, 146).Conclusion: Although patients with preoperative depression were more likely to take opioids preoperatively and to obtain ≥1 opioid refill postoperatively, they did not have greater odds of chronic postoperative opioid use or greater cumulative opioid consumption after ACL reconstruction.

Impact of prescription drug monitoring program mandate on postoperative opioid prescriptions in children

PURPOSE

Prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs) have been established to combat the opioid epidemic, but there is no data on their efficacy in children. We hypothesized that a statewide PDMP mandate would be associated with fewer opioid prescriptions in pediatric surgical patients.

METHODS

Patients < 18 undergoing inguinal hernia repair, orchiopexy, orchiectomy, appendectomy, or cholecystectomy at a tertiary children's hospital were included. The primary outcome, discharge opioid prescription, was compared for 10 months pre-PDMP (n = 158) to 10 months post-PDMP (n = 228). Interrupted time series analysis was performed to determine the effect of the PDMP on opioid prescribing.

RESULTS

Over the 20-month study period, there was an overall decrease in the rate of opioid prescriptions per month (- 3.6% change, p < 0.001). On interrupted time series analysis, PDMP implementation was not associated with a significant decrease in the monthly rate of opioid prescriptions (1.27% change post-PDMP, p = 0.4). However, PDMP implementation was associated with a reduction in opioid prescriptions of greater than 5 days' supply (- 2.7% per month, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Opioid prescriptions declined in pediatric surgical patients over the study time period. State-wide PDMP implementation was associated with a reduction in postoperative opioid prescriptions of more than 5 days' duration.

Opioid prescribing to preteen children undergoing ambulatory surgery in the United States

BACKGROUND

Overuse and misuse of opioids is a continuing crisis. The most common reason for children to receive opioids is postoperative pain, and they are often prescribed more than needed. The amount of opioids prescribed varies widely, even for minor ambulatory procedures. This study uses a large national sample to describe filled opioid prescriptions to preteen patients after all ambulatory surgical procedures and common standard procedures.

METHODS

We analyzed Truven Health MarketScan data for July 2012 through December 2016 to perform descriptive analyses of opioid fills by age and geographic area, change over time, second opioid fills in opioid-naïve patients, and variation in the types and amount of medication prescribed for 18 common and standard procedures in otolaryngology, urology, general surgery, ophthalmology, and orthopedics.

RESULTS

Over 10% of preteen children filled perioperative opioid prescriptions for ambulatory surgery in the period 2012 to 2016. The amount prescribed varied widely (median 5 days' supply, IQR 3-8, range 1-90), even for the most minor procedures, for example, frenotomy (median 4 days' supply, IQR 2-5, range 1-60). Codeine fills were common despite safety concerns. Second opioid prescriptions were filled by opioid-naïve patients after almost all procedures studied. The rate of prescribing declined significantly over time and varied substantially by age and across census regions.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified opioid prescribing outside of the norms of standard practice in all of the specialties studied. Standardizing perioperative opioid prescribing and developing guidelines on appropriate prescribing for children may reduce the opioids available for misuse and diversion.

Perioperative Opioid Exposure Patterns in Pediatric Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Ten-Year Administrative Database Study

Introduction: Variation in opioid exposure has been documented in many pediatric fields; however, little is currently known about the extent of these findings during the perioperative period. The purpose of this study was to examine perioperative opioid exposure on a national level among patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using an administrative database. Our aims were to assess the impact of hospitals and a variety of demographic factors on (1) the likelihood of perioperative opioid exposure and (2) the variability in relative opioid exposure.

Methods: The Pediatric Health Information Systems Database (PHIS) was used to identify pediatric patients (≤ 18 years old) across 52 hospitals undergoing ACL reconstruction between January 2008 and December 2017. Administered opioids in morphine milligram equivalents were discretized into quintiles to represent relative opioid exposure (ROE). A hurdle generalized additive model was estimated to identify demographic factors predictive of (1) the receipt of any opioid medication and (2) the ROE among those receiving opioids.

Results: Of the 19,821 patients meeting study inclusion criteria, 17,350 (88%) were administered opioid medications perioperatively. There was no temporal trend in perioperative opioid utilization or ROE over the study period. Patients in an inpatient (OR = 0.260 [0.221, 0.305]) or observation unit (OR = 0.349 [0.305, 0.401]) context were less likely to be administered opioids. Female patients (OR = 0.896 [0.813, 0.987]) were less likely to be administered opioids, while patients on commercial insurance had a higher ROE (OR = 1.09 [1.023, 1.161]). Patient age and hospital-level time trends predicted opioid administration and exposure (max p < 0.001).

Discussion: Gender, age, surgical setting, hospital type, and insurance status, in part, predicted perioperative opioid exposure among pediatric patients undergoing ACL reconstruction surgery. Exposure has not declined in recent years and varies significantly between hospitals. Although this study primarily served to document demographic variability in perioperative opioid exposure in pediatric patients undergoing ACL reconstruction, the understanding of variability in perioperative opioid utilization and exposure rate could stand to be further explored.

Evaluating Opioid Dispensing Rates among Pediatrics and Young Adults based on CURES Data Reporting in California from 2015-2019

Background

Receipt of opioid prescriptions in pediatric and young adult patients may be a risk factor for future opioid misuse. Data from prescription drug monitoring programs provide insight on outpatient opioid use. In our study, we analyzed the opioid dispensing rates for pediatrics and young adults in California.

Methods

A secondary analysis was performed from 2015-2019 using Controlled Utilization Review and Evaluation System data. This database provides dispensing data of controlled substances in California. Patients younger than 25 years who were prescribed opiates were analyzed by county. We further divided them into two groups (children: ≤14 years; adolescents and young adult: 15-24 years). Descriptive statistics and heat maps were used to illustrate the trends in opioid usage among different age groups.

Results

The overall percentages for the number of opioids being dispensed to patients aged <25 years have decreased over the past four years. In 2015, 6 out of 58 counties in California were considered "high-rate" with >2.9% of opioids dispensed to patients younger than 25 years old; in 2019, this number reduced to zero. Patients 25 and older received a higher proportion of opioids compared to younger populations; in 2019, 35.91% of opioids were dispensed to patients 45-64, and 8.92% to patients younger than 25.

Conclusion

Pediatric opioid prescriptions have declined over the recent years. However, a high degree of variability of prescription rates between demographic counties was noted. More studies are warranted in order to understand this discrepancy in opioid prescribing among pediatric and young adult patients.

Refilling Opioid Prescriptions After Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery: An Analysis of Incidence and Risk Factors

BACKGROUND

Understanding which pediatric patients seek opioid refills is crucial as prescription opioid use in childhood is associated with an increased risk of future opioid misuse. Orthopaedic surgeons are optimally positioned to lead the charge in addressing the opioid epidemic. The aim of this study was to describe the incidence of and risk factors associated with requiring opioid refills after pediatric orthopaedic surgery in children.

METHODS

This retrospective case-control study included 1413 patients aged 0 to 18 years that underwent orthopaedic surgery at a single tertiary care children's hospital and were prescribed opioids at discharge. Using the state Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) database, we determined which patients filled additional opioid prescriptions within 6 months following an orthopaedic procedure. Comparisons were made between patients that sought additional opioids and those that did not use bivariate analysis and binomial logistic regression.

RESULTS

In total, 31 (2.2%) patients sought additional opioid prescriptions a median 41 days postoperatively (range, 2 to 184). Nearly half of these patients obtained refills from providers outside of our institution, suggesting that previous reports using hospital records may underestimate its prevalence. Factors associated with requiring opioid refills included receiving hydromorphone [odds ratio (OR)=3.04, P=0.04] or methadone (OR=38.14, P<0.01) while inpatient, surgery on the axial skeleton (OR=5.42, P=0.01) or lower extremity (OR=2.49, P=0.04), and nonfracture surgery (OR=3.27, P=0.01). Patients who obtained additional opioids received significantly more opioids during their inpatient recovery (32.9 vs. 11.1 morphine equivalents, P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 2% of children and families obtain additional opioids within 6 months of orthopaedic surgery. The volume of opioids during inpatient hospitalization may predict the need for opioid prescription refills after discharge. Clinicians should maximize efforts to achieve pain control with multimodal analgesia and opioid alternatives, and use caution when administering high-dose opioids during postoperative hospitalization.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-prognostic.

Predictors of Long-term Opioid Use After Elective Primary Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Opioids are prescribed routinely for pain after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). This study was designed to characterize opioid use after elective primary TSA and identify predictors of long-term postoperative opioid use. The authors used the MarketScan administrative claims database to identify 5676 adults who underwent elective primary TSA between 2010 and 2015 and had 1 year or more of continuous insurance enrollment, including prescription drug coverage, postoperatively. Long-term postoperative opioid use was defined as filling prescriptions totaling a 120-day or greater supply during the 3- to 12-month postoperative period. The authors performed univariate regression analysis with age, sex, US region, anatomic or reverse TSA, anxiety, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, depression, diabetes, history of drug abuse, hypertension, obesity, osteoporosis, history of myocardial infarction, and current tobacco use. Variables that were significant at P<.05 were included in multivariate logistic regression. Overall, 16% of patients had long-term postoperative opioid use, which was strongly predicted by the multivariate model (area under the curve, 0.77; P<.001). The strongest predictors in the multivariate analysis were preoperative opioid use (odds ratio [OR], 4.7; 95% CI, 4.0-5.5), history of drug abuse (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.3-4.9), depression (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.6-2.3), anxiety (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.7), surgery performed in the Western United States (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-2.4), and reverse TSA (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-1.8). Most patients do not have long-term opioid use after elective primary TSA. Strong predictors of long-term postoperative opioid use are preoperative opioid use, history of drug abuse, depression, anxiety, reverse TSA, and surgery performed in the Western United States. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(1):58-63.].

Guidelines for Opioid Prescribing in Children and Adolescents After Surgery: An Expert Panel Opinion

IMPORTANCE

Opioids are frequently prescribed to children and adolescents after surgery. Prescription opioid misuse is associated with high-risk behavior in youth. Evidence-based guidelines for opioid prescribing practices in children are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To assemble a multidisciplinary team of health care experts and leaders in opioid stewardship, review current literature regarding opioid use and risks unique to pediatric populations, and develop a broad framework for evidence-based opioid prescribing guidelines for children who require surgery.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

Reviews of relevant literature were performed including all English-language articles published from January 1, 1988, to February 28, 2019, found via searches of the PubMed (MEDLINE), CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Pediatric was defined as children younger than 18 years. Animal and experimental studies, case reports, review articles, and editorials were excluded. Selected articles were graded using tools from the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine 2011 levels of evidence. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument was applied throughout guideline creation. Consensus was determined using a modified Delphi technique.

FINDINGS

Overall, 14 574 articles were screened for inclusion, with 217 unique articles included for qualitative synthesis. Twenty guideline statements were generated from a 2-day in-person meeting and subsequently reviewed, edited, and endorsed externally by pediatric surgical specialists, the American Pediatric Surgery Association Board of Governors, the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Surgery Executive Committee, and the American College of Surgeons Board of Regents. Review of the literature and guideline statements underscored 3 primary themes: (1) health care professionals caring for children who require surgery must recognize the risks of opioid misuse associated with prescription opioids, (2) nonopioid analgesic use should be optimized in the perioperative period, and (3) patient and family education regarding perioperative pain management and safe opioid use practices must occur both before and after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These are the first opioid-prescribing guidelines to address the unique needs of children who require surgery. Health care professionals caring for children and adolescents in the perioperative period should optimize pain management and minimize risks associated with opioid use by engaging patients and families in opioid stewardship efforts.

Opioid use in children's surgery: Awareness, current state, and advocacy

In response to the ongoing opioid epidemic, many surgeons who care for children have reflected upon current practices and the history of our own prescribing. In this editorial review, we provide a brief summary of the origins of opioid use in medicine and surgery, we describe how the ongoing opioid epidemic specifically impacts children and adolescents, and we explore contemporary efforts underway to facilitate evidence-based opioid prescribing. Resources for pediatric surgeons including national guidelines related to safe opioid prescribing and web-based toolkits that may be used to implement change locally are highlighted. The goal of the present manuscript is to introduce opioid stewardship as a guiding principle in pediatric surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: LEVEL V (Expert opinion).

Validating an opioid prescribing algorithm in post-operative pediatric surgical oncology patients

PURPOSE

We developed an algorithm to decrease opioid prescriptions for pediatric oncology patients at discharge following surgery, based on a retrospective analysis to decrease variability and over-prescribing. The aim of this study was to prospectively test the algorithm.

METHODS

Opioid-naïve patients undergoing surgery for tumor resection at a single institution were included. A prescribing algorithm was developed based on surgical approach, day of discharge, and inpatient opioid use. Prospectively collected data included outpatient opioid consumption and patient/family satisfaction. Total home dose prescribed was equal to that used in the 8 or 24 h, depending on length of stay and operative approach, prior to discharge, divided into 0.15 mg/kg doses.

RESULTS

The algorithm was used in 121 patients and correctly predicted outpatient opioid requirements for 102 patients (84.3%). For 15 (12.4%) patients, the algorithm over-estimated opioid need by an average of 0.38 OME/kg. Four (3.3%) patients required additional opioids. Using this algorithm, we decreased overall opioid prescriptions from 6.17 to 0.21 OME/kg (p < 0.001), and all but one patient/family reported being satisfied with post-operative pain control.

CONCLUSION

Using an algorithm based on inpatient opioid use, outpatient opioid needs can be accurately predicted, thereby reducing excess opioid prescriptions without detriment to patient satisfaction.

TYPE OF STUDY

Prospective Quality Initiative Study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Opioid prescribing practices after posterior spinal arthrodesis for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

OBJECTIVE

To identify national trends in postoperative opioid prescribing practices after posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Opioids are an important component of pain management after PSF for AIS. Given the national opioid crisis, it is important to understand opioid prescribing practices in these patients.

METHODS

Using a commercial prescription drug claims database, we identified AIS patients who underwent PSF from 2010 to 2016 and who were prescribed opioids postoperatively. An initial prescription at hospital discharge of ≥ 90 morphine milligram equivalents daily (MMED) was used to identify patients at risk of overdose according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines. Prescriptions for skeletal muscle relaxants were also identified. α = 0.05.

RESULTS

We included 3762 patients (75% female) with a mean (± standard deviation) age of 15 ± 2.1 years. 56% of patients filled only 1 opioid prescription after discharge, and 44% had ≥ 1 refills. 91% of opioid prescriptions were for hydrocodone (median strength, 43 MMED; mean strength, 65 ± 270 MMED) or oxycodone formulations (median strength, 60 MMED; mean strength, 79 ± 174 MMED). 82% of prescriptions complied with CDC guidelines (< 90 MMED). Overall, 612 patients (16%) filled ≥ 1 prescription for skeletal muscle relaxants, the most common being cyclobenzaprine (45%) and methocarbamol (29%). The percentage of patients filling > 1 prescription declined from 54% in 2010 to 31% in 2016 (p < 0.001). The proportion of patients receiving prescriptions for ≥ 90 MMED was highest in the West (29%) and lowest in the South (16%) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Most opioid prescriptions after PSF in patients with AIS comply with CDC guidelines. Temporal and geographic variations show an opportunity for standardizing opioid prescribing practices in these patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Provider education decreases opioid prescribing after pediatric umbilical hernia repair

PURPOSE

To improve opioid stewardship for umbilical hernia repair in children.

METHODS

An educational intervention was conducted at 9 centers with 79 surgeons. The intervention highlighted the importance of opioid stewardship, demonstrated practice variation, provided prescribing guidelines, encouraged non-opioid analgesics, and encouraged limiting doses/strength if opioids were prescribed. Three to six months of pre-intervention and 3 months of post-intervention prescribing practices for umbilical hernia repair were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 343 patients were identified in the pre-intervention cohort and 346 in the post-intervention cohort. The percent of patients receiving opioids at discharge decreased from 75.8% pre-intervention to 44.6% (p < 0.001) post-intervention. After adjusting for age, sex, umbilicoplasty, and hospital site, the odds ratio for opioid prescribing in the post- versus the pre-intervention period was 0.27 (95% CI = 0.18-0.39, p < 0.001). Among patients receiving opioids, the number of doses prescribed decreased after the intervention (adjusted mean 14.3 to 10.4, p < 0.001). However, the morphine equivalents/kg/dose did not significantly decrease (adjusted mean 0.14 to 0.13, p = 0.20). There were no differences in returns to emergency departments or hospital readmissions between the pre- and post-intervention cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Opioid stewardship can be improved after pediatric umbilical hernia repair using a low-fidelity educational intervention.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective cohort study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Eliminating Opiate Prescribing for Children after Non-Perforated Appendectomy

BACKGROUND

Opiates are the traditional treatment for postoperative pain. Recognition that increased availability of opiates in the community is associated with increased addiction has led to efforts to decrease postoperative opiate distribution. However, there are concerns that without opiates, pain relief might be inadequate.

STUDY DESIGN

We analyzed opiate prescriptions to children who had undergone appendectomy during 3 time periods: before intervention (July 2012 through February 2013), after opiate prescriptions were standardized and reduced (December 2016 through December 2017), and after opiate prescriptions were eliminated (January 2018 through December 2018). We determined how many opiate prescriptions had been written and how many had been filled in each time period. Patients were contacted by phone to identify their medication use and quality of pain management.

RESULTS

Pre-intervention, 75 children underwent appendectomy, and all received opiate prescriptions, with a mean of 15 doses of oxycodone prescribed per patient. After reduction, 208 children underwent appendectomy and 30% received opiate prescriptions, for a mean of 1.5 doses of oxycodone per patient. After elimination, 270 patients underwent appendectomy and 3 patients (1.1%) received opiate prescriptions, for a mean of 0.05 doses of oxycodone per patient. Patients contacted by phone expressed no pain relief issues and no patients needed opiates later.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a stepwise process, we have eliminated the use of opiates for postdischarge pain in children undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy. This intervention has resulted in the elimination of 4,035 doses of oxycodone from the community during the study period, while ensuring that postoperative pain control has been adequate.

The Surgeon's Role in the Opioid Crisis: A Narrative Review and Call to Action

Over the past two decades, there has been a sharp rise in the use of prescription opioids. In several countries, most notably the United States, opioid-related harm has been deemed a public health crisis. As surgeons are among the most prolific prescribers of opioids, growing attention is now being paid to the role that opioids play in surgical care. While opioids may sometimes be necessary to provide patients with adequate relief from acute pain after major surgery, the impact of opioids on the quality and safety of surgical care calls for greater scrutiny. This narrative review summarizes the available evidence on rates of persistent postsurgical opioid use and highlights the need to target known risk factors for persistent postoperative use before patients present for surgery. We draw attention to the mounting evidence that preoperative opioid exposure places patients at risk of persistent postoperative use, while also contributing to an increased risk of several other adverse clinical outcomes. By discussing the prevalence of excess opioid prescribing following surgery and highlighting significant variations in prescribing practices between countries, we note that there is a pressing need to optimize postoperative prescribing practices. Guided by the available evidence, we call for specific actions to be taken to address important research gaps and alleviate the harms associated with opioid use among surgical patients.

Spillover Effect of Opioid Reduction Interventions From Adult to Pediatric Surgery

BACKGROUND

Procedure-specific prescribing guidelines and trainee education have reduced opioid overprescribing in adult surgical patients, but tailored interventions do not yet exist for children. It is unknown what effect these adult interventions have had on postoperative opioid prescribing in children at the same institution, where trainees rotate across both adult and pediatric services.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study of patients (<18 y) undergoing pediatric surgery (PS), pediatric otolaryngology (ENT), or pediatric urology (URO) procedures at a single tertiary academic center assessed opioid doses per patient before (January 01, 2015 to September 30, 2016) and after (January 01, 2017 to March 31, 2018) opioid prescribing guidelines and trainee education were instituted for adult laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patient demographics, postoperative opioid prescribing, opioid refills, and emergency department (ED) visits <21 d after surgery were compared using chi-squared analyses and t-tests. Interrupted time-series analyses (ITSA) assessed changes in the rate of opioid prescribing pre- and postintervention for each subspecialty.

RESULTS

There were 3371 patients preintervention and 2439 patients postintervention. After the intervention, fewer patients were prescribed opioids (ENT: 97% versus 93%, P < 0.001; URO: 98% versus 94%, P < 0.001; PS: 61% versus 25%, P < 0.001) and fewer opioid doses were prescribed in each prescription (ENT: 63.8 ± 26.1 versus 50.8 ± 22.0 doses, P < 0.001; URO: 33.5 ± 23.4 versus 22.1 ± 11.3, P < 0.001; PS: 20.4 ± 12.8 versus 13.8 ± 11.4 doses, P < 0.001). There were no changes in opioid refill or ED visit rates postintervention. A decreasing rate in ENT prescribing was seen preintervention, with no significant change postintervention (-2.3 ± 1.1 versus -3.3 ± 0.7; P = 0.24). Whereas, the rate of decrease in PS and URO prescribing significantly slowed postintervention (PS: -2.0 ± 0.1 versus -0.9 ± 0.1, P < 0.001; URO: -4.2 ± 0.2 versus -2.3 ± 0.5, P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Opioid prescribing rates are decreasing, but adult interventions did not achieve reductions in pediatric opioid prescribing at the same institution. There was no concomitant rise in postoperative ED visits or opioid refills as prescribing declined, indicating that the risks of reducing opioid prescriptions may be minimal. Development of evidence-based, procedure-specific prescribing guidelines that specifically address pediatric patients are needed to effectively minimize opioid overprescribing in this population.

Prescription vs. consumption: Opioid overprescription to children after common surgical procedures

BACKGROUND

In the setting of a national opioid epidemic there are concerns about routine overprescription of opioids postoperatively in both children and adults, which introduces excess opioids into the community.

PURPOSE

We sought to examine current opioid prescribing practices by surgeons and consumption of prescribed opioids by pediatric surgical patients following discharge.

METHODS

Starting in January 2017 we began an emailed survey for all postoperative patients in a 23-hospital system about the opioids they were prescribed and consumed following discharge. They were then asked if their pain was controlled. Responses of pediatric patients (age 10-18) were examined.

FINDINGS

Data from 277 patients were analyzed. After surgical procedures, patients were prescribed significantly more opioids (given in hydrocodone 5 mg equivalents) than they consumed: for appendectomy (median 10 vs. 2) cholecystectomy (12 vs. 5), hernia repair (20 vs. 14), tonsillectomy (30 vs. 17), sinus surgery (30 vs. 5), septoplasty (27 vs. 9.5), knee arthroscopy (30 vs. 12.5), open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the hand and wrist (20 vs. 8.5), and ORIF of the foot and ankle (27 vs. 13.5). The majority (84%) of patients agreed or strongly agreed with the statement that their pain was controlled. Of patients with excess opioids, 64% reported keeping them in their home.

CONCLUSIONS

Providers prescribed more opioid tablets than were used by patients. Despite using fewer tablets, patients reported good pain control. Current prescribing practices contribute to excess opioids in the community and represent an opportunity to alter the current epidemic.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Pediatric postoperative opioid prescribing and the opioid crisis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to explore the effects of the opioid crisis on pediatric patients in the postoperative setting and provide recommendations for well-tolerated opioid prescribing practices.

RECENT FINDINGS

Opioid overdoses have increased among all age groups, predominantly related to overprescribing and accessibility of opioids in the home. Adverse risks of prescribed opioids include respiratory depression, gastrointestinal distress, accidental ingestion, intentional misuse, new chronic use, diversion to another user, and overdose. Well-tolerated opioid prescribing practices include multimodal pain management; prescribing guided by patient need; risk assessment for potential misuse; and comprehensive patient and family education on risks, safe storage, and disposal practices. Evolving state laws will affect varying institutional policies; thus, providers must ensure their prescribing practices are current and compliant.

SUMMARY

All age groups have been affected by the opioid crisis, including children and adolescents. When managing postoperative pain, clinicians must balance appropriate pain management with well-tolerated opioid stewardship to minimize harm related to postoperative care.

Inconsistency in Opioid Prescribing Practices After Pediatric Ambulatory Hernia Surgery

INTRODUCTION

Nonmedical opioid use is a major public health problem. There is little standardization in opioid-prescribing practices for pediatric ambulatory surgery, which can result in patients being prescribed large quantities of opioids. We have evaluated the variability in postoperative pain medication given to pediatric patients following routine ambulatory pediatric surgical procedures.

METHODS

Following IRB approval, pediatric patients undergoing umbilical hernia repair, inguinal hernia repair, hydrocelectomy, and orchiopexy from 2/1/2017 to 2/1/2018 at our tertiary care children's hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Data collected include operation, surgeon, resident or fellow involvement, utilization of preoperative analgesia, opioid prescription on discharge, and patient follow-up.

RESULTS

Of 329 patients identified, opioids were prescribed on discharge to 37.4% of patients (66.3% of umbilical hernia repairs, 20.6% of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs, and 33.3% of open inguinal hernia repairs [including hydrocelectomies and orchiopexies]). For each procedure, there was large intrasurgeon and intersurgeon variability in the number of opioid doses prescribed. Opioid prescription ranged from 0 to 33 doses for umbilical hernia repairs, 0 to 24 doses for laparoscopic inguinal repairs, and 0 to 20 doses prescribed for open inguinal repairs, hydrocelectomies, and orchiopexies. Pediatric surgical fellows were less likely to discharge a patient with an opioid prescription than surgical resident prescribers (P < 0.01). In addition, surgical residents were more likely to prescribe more than twelve doses of opioids than pediatric surgical fellows (P < 0.01). Increasing patient age was associated with an increased likelihood of opioid prescription (P < 0.01). There were two phone calls and two clinic visits for pain control issues with equal numbers for those with and without opioid prescriptions.

CONCLUSIONS

There is significant variation in opioid-prescribing practices after pediatric surgical procedures; increased awareness may help minimize this variability and reduce overprescribing. Training level has an impact on the frequency and quantity of opioids prescribed.