Evolution of gastrectomy for cancer over 30-years: Changes in presentation, management, and outcomes

A Comparison of Established Diagnostic Criteria for Cachexia and Their Impacts on Prognostication in Patients with Oesophagogastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

Cachexia is common in patients with oesophagogastric cancer. The syndrome is characterised by tissue wasting (muscle and fat), anorexia, and reduced physical function, which result from complex interactions between the tumour and its host. Heterogeneity in the diagnostic criteria used for cachexia has hindered their clinical utilisation. This study aimed to compare the two established cachexia definitions (Fearon's consensus definition and the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition [GLIM] criteria) and their relationships with survival in patients with oesophagogastric cancer.

METHODS

Consecutive patients newly diagnosed with oesophagogastric cancer (January 2019 to December 2020) were identified from a prospective regional database. Involuntary weight loss, BMI, CT body composition analyses, and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratios were recorded at clinical staging. These data were used to assess patients for cachexia according to Fearon and GLIM diagnostic criteria. The primary outcome of interest was overall survival.

RESULTS

Overall, 465 patients (66.9% male, median 71 years) were diagnosed with oesophagogastric cancer during the 2-year study period. Cachectic proportions differed between definitions (Fearon: 59.1% vs. GLIM: 44.1%), and only 49.1% of the 322 patients who met one set of diagnostic criteria were cachectic according to both. Patients who met the GLIM criteria were significantly more comorbid and had a poorer performance status; however, no such difference was evident when using the Fearon definition. Those patients who met either set of diagnostic criteria had shorter survival than those who met neither (p < 0.001). Following adjustment for confounders, GLIM-defined cachexia was more strongly associated with reduced survival (aHR: 1.57 [95% CI: 1.25-1.96], p < 0.001) than Fearon-defined cachexia (aHR: 1.41 [95% CI: 1.13-1.76], p = 0.002). Patients who only met the Fearon diagnostic criteria had prolonged survival (median: 363 days) when compared to those who met only GLIM (median: 158 days) or both definitions (median: 120 days). A secondary analysis of those patients who met the GLIM diagnostic criteria (n = 205) compared the three potential phenotypical criteria used in this definition. Only reduced muscle mass, and not low BMI or weight loss, was associated with poorer survival (aHR: 1.88 [95% CI: 1.15-3.07], p = 0.012) in this group.

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer cachexia is strongly associated with shortened survival in patients with oesophagogastric cancer. Classification using the GLIM criteria provides more effective prognostication and this definition should be utilised in multidisciplinary patient care.

Prevalence of sarcopenic obesity in patients with gastric cancer and effects on adverse outcomes: A meta-analysis and systematic review

PURPOSE

To assess the prevalence of sarcopenic obesity in patients with gastric cancer and its impact on adverse outcomes.

METHODS

A computerized search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases was performed to search for articles related to sarcopenic obesity in patients with gastric cancer. The search was conducted until June 16, 2024, from the date of the creation of the database.

RESULTS

A total of sixteen studies were included, including fifteen cohort studies and one cross-sectional study involving 4087 patients. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the prevalence of sarcopenic obesity in gastric cancer patients was 16.3 % (95 % CI: 12.2 %-20.4 %). Sarcopenic obesity significantly shortened the overall survival of gastric cancer patients (HR = 1.64, 95 % CI: 1.20 to 2.25, P = 0.002) and increased the risk of postoperative significant complications (OR = 2.84, 95 % CI: 1.95 to 4.16, P < 0.001), severe complications (OR = 2.60, 95 % CI: 1.45 to 4.64, P = 0.001), surgical site infection (OR = 3.82, 95 % CI: 1.47 to 9.89, P = 0.006), and mortality (OR = 4.84, 95 % CI: 1.38 to 17.02, P = 0.014), but no significant effect on 30-day readmission (OR = 1.90, 95 % CI: 0.31 to 11.84, P = 0.491).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of sarcopenic obesity is high in patients with gastric cancer and is strongly associated with poor postoperative outcomes. Healthcare providers should evaluate patients with gastric cancer for sarcopenic obesity early to prevent or reduce the incidence of adverse outcomes.

Navigating complexities and considerations for suspected anastomotic leakage in the upper gastrointestinal tract: A state of the art review

This state-of-the-art review explores the intricacies of anastomotic leaks following oesophagectomy and gastrectomy, crucial surgeries for globally increasing esophageal and gastric cancers. Despite advancements, anastomotic leaks occur in up to 30 % and 10 % of oesophagectomy and gastrectomy cases, respectively, leading to prolonged hospital stays, substantial impact upon short- and long-term health-related quality of life and greater mortality. Recognising factors contributing to leaks, including patient characteristics and surgical techniques, are vital for preoperative risk stratification. Diagnosis is challenging, involving clinical signs, biochemical markers, and various imaging modalities. Management strategies range from non-invasive approaches, including antibiotic therapy and nutritional support, to endoscopic interventions such as stent placement and emerging vacuum-assisted closure devices, and surgical interventions, necessitating timely recognition and tailored interventions. A step-up approach, beginning non-invasively and progressing based on treatment success, is more commonly advocated. This comprehensive review highlights the absence of standardised treatment algorithms, emphasizing the importance of individualised patient-specific management.

Risk factors for death from other diseases after curative gastrectomy and lymph node dissection for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Recent advances in treatment are expected to bring a cure to more patients with gastric cancer (GC). Focusing on the risk of death from other diseases (DOD) has become a crucial issue in patients cured of GC. The aim of this study was to elucidate the risk factors for DOD in patients who underwent curative gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for GC.

METHODS

We enrolled 810 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for GC from January 1990 to December 2014 and had no recurrence or death of GC until December 2019. We investigated the risk factors for DOD defined as death excluding death from a malignant neoplasm, accident, or suicide after gastrectomy, focusing on the perioperative characteristics at gastrectomy.

RESULTS

Among 315 deaths from any cause, 210 died from diseases other than malignancy, accidents and suicide. The leading cause of DOD was pneumonia in 54 patients (25.7%). The actual survival period in 167 patients (79.5%) with DOD was shorter than their estimated life expectancy at gastrectomy. Multivariate analysis revealed that a high Charlson Comorbidity Index score (score 1-2: hazard ratio [HR] 2.192, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.713-2.804, P < 0.001 and score ≥ 3: HR 4.813, 95% CI 3.022-7.668, P < 0.001), total gastrectomy (HR 1.620, 95% CI 1.195-2.197, P = 0.002) and the presence of postoperative complications (HR 1.402, 95% CI 1.024-1.919, P = 0.035) were significant independent risk factors for DOD after gastrectomy for GC, in addition to age of 70 years or higher, performance status of one or higher and body mass index less than 22.0 at gastrectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Pneumonia is a leading cause of DOD after curative gastrectomy and lymph node dissection for GC. Paying attention to comorbidities, minimizing the choice of total gastrectomy and avoiding postoperative complications are essential to maintain the long-term prognosis after gastrectomy.

Effects of unimodal or multimodal prehabilitation on patients undergoing surgery for esophagogastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effects of unimodal or multimodal prehabilitation on patients undergoing surgery for esophagogastric cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) databases from database inception to May 5, 2023, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies that investigated prehabilitation in the context of esophagogastric cancer. A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 2,994 records and eventually included 12 studies (6 RCTs and 6 cohort studies) with a total of 910 patients. According to random-effects pooled estimates, prehabilitation reduced the incidence of all complications (RR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.66 to 0.93, P = 0.006), pulmonary complications (RR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.79, P = 0.0002), and severe complications (RR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.84, P = 0.002), and shortened the length of stay (MD = -1.92, 95% CI: -3.11 to -0.73, P = 0.002) compared to usual care. However, there were no statistically significant differences in 30-day readmission rates or in-hospital mortality. Subgroup analysis showed that multimodal prehabilitation was effective in reducing the risk of all complications and severe complications, while unimodal prehabilitation was not.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggested that prehabilitation may be beneficial in reducing postoperative complications and length of stay. We recommend preoperative prehabilitation to improve postoperative outcomes and hasten recovery following esophagogastric cancer surgery, and multimodal prehabilitation seems to be more advantageous in reducing complications. However, further studies are needed to confirm these results.

The prognostic impact of pre-treatment cachexia in resectional surgery for oesophagogastric cancer: a meta-analysis and meta-regression

BACKGROUND

Cancer cachexia is not purely an end-stage phenomenon and can influence the outcomes of patients with potentially curable disease. This review examines the effect of pre-treatment cachexia on overall survival, in patients undergoing surgical resection of oesophagogastric cancer.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases was conducted, from January 2000 to May 2022, to identify studies reporting the influence of cachexia on patients undergoing an oesophagogastric resection for cancer with curative intent. Meta-analyses of the primary (overall survival) and secondary (disease-free survival and postoperative mortality) outcomes were performed using random-effects modelling. Meta-regression was used to examine disease stage as a potential confounder.

RESULTS

Ten non-randomized studies, comprising 7186 patients, were eligible for inclusion. The prevalence of pre-treatment cachexia was 35 per cent (95 per cent c.i.: 24-47 per cent). Pooled adjusted hazard ratios showed that cachexia was adversely associated with overall survival (HR 1.46, 95 per cent c.i.: 1.31-1.60, P < 0.001). Meta-analysis of proportions identified decreased overall survival at 1-, 3- and 5-years in cachectic cohorts. Pre-treatment cachexia was not a predictor of disease-free survival and further data are required to establish its influence on postoperative mortality. The proportion of patients with stage III/IV disease was a significant moderator of between-study heterogeneity. Cachexia may have a greater influence on overall survival in studies where more patients have a locally advanced malignancy.

CONCLUSION

Pre-treatment cachexia adversely influences overall survival following resection of an oesophagogastric malignancy.

Association between use of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols and postoperative complications after gastric surgery for cancer (POWER 4): a nationwide, prospective multicentre study

INTRODUCTION

The effectiveness of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols in gastric cancer surgery remains controversial.

METHODS

Multicentre prospective cohort study of adult patients undergoing surgery for gastric cancer. Adherence with 22 individual components of ERAS pathways were assessed in all patients, regardless of whether they were treated in a self-designed ERAS centre. Each centre had a three-month recruitment period between October 2019 and September 2020. The primary outcome was moderate-to-severe postoperative complications within 30 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes were overall postoperative complications, adherence to the ERAS pathway, 30 day-mortality and hospital length of stay (LOS).

RESULTS

A total of 743 patients in 72 Spanish hospitals were included, 211 of them (28.4 %) from self-declared ERAS centres. A total of 245 patients (33 %) experienced postoperative complications, graded as moderate-to-severe complications in 172 patients (23.1 %). There were no differences in the incidence of moderate-to-severe complications (22.3% vs. 23.5%; OR, 0.92 (95% CI, 0.59 to 1.41); P = 0.068), or overall postoperative complications between the self-declared ERAS and non-ERAS groups (33.6% vs. 32.7%; OR, 1.05 (95 % CI, 0.70 to 1.56); P = 0.825). The overall rate of adherence to the ERAS pathway was 52% [IQR 45 to 60]. There were no differences in postoperative outcomes between higher (Q1, > 60 %) and lower (Q4, ≤ 45 %) ERAS adherence quartiles.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither the partial application of perioperative ERAS measures nor treatment in self-designated ERAS centres improved postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing gastric surgery for cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03865810.

The impact of age on long-term survival following gastrectomy for gastric cancer

INTRODUCTION

Gastrectomy remains the primary curative treatment modality for patients with gastric cancer. Concerns exist about offering surgery with a high associated morbidity and mortality to elderly patients. The study aimed to evaluate the long-term survival of patients with gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy comparing patients aged <70 years with patients aged ≥70 years.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma with curative intent between January 2000 and December 2017 at a single centre were included. Patients were stratified by age with a cut-off of 70 years used to create two cohorts. Log rank test was used to compare overall survival and Cox multivariable regression used to identify predictors of long-term survival.

RESULTS

During the study period, 959 patients underwent gastrectomy, 520 of whom (54%) were aged ≥70 years. Those aged <70 years had significantly lower American Society of Anesthesiologists grades (p<0.001) and were more likely to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (39% vs 21%; p<0.001). Overall complication rate (p=0.001) and 30-day postoperative mortality (p=0.007) were lower in those aged <70 years. Long-term survival (median 54 vs 73 months; p<0.001) was also favourable in the younger cohort. Following adjustment for confounding variables, age ≥70 years remained a predictor of poorer long-term survival following gastrectomy (hazard ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval 1.09, 1.67; p=0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Low postoperative mortality and good long-term survival were demonstrated for both age groups following gastrectomy. Age ≥70 years was, however, associated with poorer outcomes. This should be regarded as important factor when counselling patients regarding treatment options.

Understanding Cancer Cachexia and Its Implications in Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers

OPINION STATEMENT

Considerable advances in the investigation and management of oesophagogastric cancer have occurred over the last few decades. While the historically dismal prognosis associated with these diseases has improved, outcomes remain very poor. Cancer cachexia is an often neglected, yet critical, factor for this patient group. There is a persuasive argument that a lack of assessment and treatment of cachexia has limited progress in oesophagogastric cancer care. In the curative setting, the stage of the host (based on factors such as body composition, function, and inflammatory status), alongside tumour stage, has the potential to influence treatment efficacy. Phenotypical features of cachexia may decrease the survival benefit of (peri-operative) chemoradiotherapy, immunotherapy, or surgical resection in patients with potentially curative malignancy. Most patients with oesophagogastric cancer unfortunately present with disease which is not amenable, or is unlikely to respond, to these treatments. In the palliative setting, host factors can similarly impair results from systemic anti-cancer therapies, cause adverse symptoms, and reduce quality of life. To optimise treatment pathways and enhance patient outcomes, we must utilise this information during clinical decision-making. As our understanding of the genesis of cancer cachexia improves and more therapeutic options, ranging from basic (e.g. exercise and nutrition) to targeted (e.g. anti-IL1 α and anti-GDF-15), become available, there can be grounds for optimism. Cachexia can change from a hitherto neglected condition to an integral part of the oesophagogastric cancer treatment pathway.