Controversy in the classification of appendicitis and utilization of postoperative antibiotics

Better care for children with appendicitis: implementation of antibiotic stewardship optimizes postoperative therapy

Aim

Appendectomy is the most frequent emergency abdominal operation in children, who regularly present with complicated acute appendicitis and thus need targeted antibiotic therapy. While in other fields antibiotic stewardship (ABS) is becoming increasingly well established, these principles are not consistently followed in pediatric surgery. With this study, we aimed to analyze the effects of the implementation of an ABS-compliant SOP on the postoperative care of patients.

Material and methods

We compared the quality of antibiotic therapy before and after the implementation of standard operating procedure (SOP) for the peri-/postoperative antibiotic treatment of appendicitis in 2020. Pediatric patients who had undergone appendectomy were evaluated based on an algorithm presenting recommended antibiotic therapy of appendicitis, according to the current literature and good clinical practice. 165 patients were evaluated before and 209 patients after the implementation of SOP.

Results

The mean number of cases in which antibiotic therapy was given postoperatively was 10.5% lower (p-value 0.036) and the median quality-of-treatment score increased by 31.2% (p<0.0001) after the implementation of the SOP. The median length of antibiotic treatment in cases of advanced-stage appendicitis was 2.0 days shorter (p=0.062). The rate of oral antibiotic treatment after discharge decreased by 25.6% (p<0.0001). We observed no significant effects on the median length of hospital stay or the complication rate.

Conclusion

The implementation of SOP based on the principles of ABS positively influenced the quality of treatment after pediatric appendectomy. The algorithm developed in this study may help pediatric surgeons to improve their antimicrobial assessment.

Rethinking hospital postoperative resource use: A national analysis of pediatric appendectomy patients admitted to children's hospitals

BACKGROUND

The increased use of remote monitoring and telemedicine support may help alleviate the need for some of the postoperative inpatient hospital care and reduce health care costs, but little is known about current postoperative hospital resource use patterns. We aim to describe hospital resources use patterns in pediatric patients postappendectomy for complicated appendicitis and to evaluate the potential of earlier discharge with remote monitoring.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using the Pediatric Health Information System database for patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis between 2016 and 2021. Health care use/costs (antibiotics, intravenous fluids [proxy for diet], analgesics, laboratory studies, and imaging tests) were determined using administrative billing data. Potentially avoidable days were defined as nondischarge days without codes for intravenous opioid pain medication or intravenous fluids. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used.

RESULTS

In total, 24,165 patients were included: 8,300 patients (34.3%) had at least 1 potentially avoidable hospitalization day, totaling 13,970 days or 14.2% of all hospitalization days. Median hospitalization cost was $19,434 [$15,658-$25,157], with accommodation and operating room being the greatest contributors. Public insurance and minority races and ethnicities were associated with greater odds of potentially avoidable days. More than 80% of hospitalized patients had intravenous antibiotics through 10 days postoperatively. More than 20% received opioids daily.

CONCLUSIONS

More than one third of the patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis could have had at least 1 potentially avoidable hospitalization day. Remote monitoring and telemedicine support should be explored and could help with earlier discharge and lower costs.

Perforated Appendicitis in Children: Management, Microbiology, and Antibiotic Stewardship

Although appendicitis has been described for more than 300 years, its optimal management remains a topic of active investigation. Acute appendicitis is the most common cause of peritonitis in children, and rates of perforated appendicitis are much higher in children than in adults. Increased risk for perforated appendicitis in children is related to a delay in diagnosis due to age, size, access to care, and more. Surgical options include immediate appendectomy versus nonoperative management with intravenous antibiotics ± a drainage procedure, with a subsequent interval appendectomy. Microbiota of perforated appendicitis in children most often includes Escherichia coli, Bacteroides fragilis, Streptococcus, and more. Even though the most common organisms are known, there is a large variety of practice when it comes to postoperative antibiotic management in these patients. Studies discuss the benefits of mono- versus dual or triple therapy without a particular consensus regarding what to use. This is reflected across differing practices at various institutions. In this review, we aim to explore the implications of perforated appendicitis in pediatrics, common organisms seen, antibiotic regimen coverage, and the implications of variations of practice. Resistance to commonly used broad-spectrum antibiotics is evolving, therefore minimization of care variability is needed for improved patient outcomes and proper antibiotic stewardship.

Association between appendiceal stump closure method and post-operative bowel obstruction after laparoscopic appendectomy

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic appendectomy is one of the most common urgent pediatric surgical operations. Endoscopic surgical staplers and pre-tied endoloop ligatures are both routinely used for closure of the appendiceal stump in children. Practice patterns vary for a number of reasons, including cost, size, and ease of use. While stapling is standard for some pediatric surgeons, others believe that staples can act as a nidus for small bowel obstruction (SBO). However, studies comparing closure methods have been conflicting in their results and limited in size. Therefore, we aim to determine if there is an association between appendiceal stump closure method and SBO using a national comparative pediatric database.

METHODS

We queried the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) for patients ages 3-18 years who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicitis between 1/1/2016 - 12/31/2020. We included hospitals that had greater than 50 patients with billing data and excluded patients with inflammatory bowel disease and simultaneous abdominal operations. We used billing data for the patient's appendectomy to determine if a stapler or a suture ligature was used during the case. Our primary outcome of interest was post-operative SBO or reoperation for lysis of adhesion or intestinal surgery within the first 30 post-operative days. Multivariable regression analyses were used to estimate the association between stump closure method and post-operative SBO or reoperation in addition to cost while adjusting for patient demographics and appendiceal perforation.

RESULTS

In total, 49,191 patients from 37 hospitals were included, of which, 29,733 (60.44%) were male, 21,403 (43.51%) were non-Hispanic white, and 18,291 (37.18%) had a diagnosis of complicated appendicitis. The median [IQR] age of the cohort was 11 [8-14] years. A surgical stapler was used during laparoscopic appendectomy in 35,788 (72.75%) patients, and early SBO or reoperation occurred in 653 (1.33%) patients. In adjusted analysis controlling for demographics and complicated appendicitis there was no statistically significant difference in the odds of SBO or reoperation between the two groups. (OR 1.17; 99% CI 0.86 - 1.6). Complicated appendicitis was the factor most associated with post-operative SBO or reoperation (OR 4.4; 99% CI 3.01 - 6.44). Median cumulative cost was slightly higher on unadjusted analysis in the stapler group ($10,329.3 vs $9,569.2). However, there was no significant difference on adjusted analysis.

CONCLUSION

SBO or reoperation following laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicitis is uncommon. Complicated appendicitis is the most predictive factor of this outcome. Adjusting for available patient, disease, and hospital characteristics, use of a surgical stapler does not appear to be meaningfully associated with the development of acute SBO or reoperation. Surgeon preference remains the mainstay for safe appendiceal stump closure method.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective Comparative Study.

Postoperative Antibiotics for Complicated Appendicitis in Children: Piperacillin/Tazobactam versus Ceftriaxone with Metronidazole

INTRODUCTION

Recent studies are discordant regarding postoperative use of piperacillin/tazobactam (PT) versus ceftriaxone/metronidazole (CM) for pediatric complicated appendicitis. Some argue that the broader spectrum PT decreases intraabdominal abscess formation; however, antibiotic stewardship, and once-a-day dosing favor CM. We aim to compare outcomes of postoperative antibiotic utilization using a large administrative database.

METHODS

We queried the Pediatric Health Information System for patients 2-18 years old who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis between 2016 and 2021. Patients were grouped into PT, CM, or other using the first postoperative day antibiotics. Adverse events and antibiotic use trends were evaluated.

RESULTS

We included 29,015 children from 45 hospitals. CM was used in 51.9% and 31.3% received PT. Wide variation was seen among hospitals with PT use decreasing over the years. Overall rate of abscess was 9.2%. On multivariable regression, PT was associated with higher risk for abscess formation (RR 1.35, 99% CI 1.04-1.75) and readmission (RR 1.38, 99% CI 1.13-1.68) compared to the CM group. However, following adjustment for hospitals with high CM prevalence, these associations were no longer significant.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative use of PT for complicated appendicitis is associated with higher rates of readmissions and intraabdominal abscess when compared to CM. However, this effect is mitigated when adjusting for common practice patterns.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective Comparative Study.

Comparación de la seguridad y la eficacia del uso de antibióticos frente a la apendicectomía en el tratamiento de la apendicitis no complicada en adultos. Revisión sistemática y metaanálisis

Introducción. La apendicitis aguda es una emergencia quirúrgica frecuente, en la cual el tratamiento de tipo conservador basado en antibióticos se ha identificado como una opción terapéutica que necesita seguir siendo estudiada. El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar las diferencias en seguridad y eficacia del uso de antibióticos en comparación con la apendicectomía en adultos con apendicitis no complicada. Métodos. Revisión sistemática y metaanálisis. Se encontraron 452 estudios; después de una selección, 45 se evaluaron en texto completo y 15 para calidad metodológica; 11 estudios fueron seleccionados y 9 incluidos en el metaanálisis. Resultados. Se contó con 3186 participantes, de los cuales 1512 fueron tratados con terapia antibiótica y 1674 sometidos a apendicectomía. Se identificó estancia hospitalaria más corta en los pacientes sometidos a apendicectomía (SMD: 0,28; IC95%: 0,14 a 0,41). Para los pacientes tratados con terapia antibiótica, se evidenció puntajes de riesgo menores en las escalas de diagnóstico de apendicitis (SMD: -0,13; IC95%: -0,22 a -0,04), menor éxito terapéutico en un 16 % (RR: 0,84; IC95%: 0,77 a 0,92) y reducción del riesgo de complicaciones del 63 % (RR: 0,37; IC95%: 0,25 a 0,53). Se encontró alta heterogeneidad y riesgo de sesgo de publicación. Conclusiones. La terapia antibiótica necesita mayor evidencia para desenlaces como calidad de vida, satisfacción, dolor, o complicaciones específicas, entre otros, que permitan hacer comparaciones más contundentes. Los pacientes que consideren el manejo conservador necesitan ser adecuadamente asesorados y monitorizados para optimizar sus posibilidades de resultados favorables y la oportuna identificación de complicaciones que necesiten de otros abordajes.