Multidisciplinary treatment strategy for locally advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review

Analysis of postoperative complications and long term survival following radical gastrectomy for patients with gastric cancer

This study aimed to analyze the complications and long-term survival outcomes in patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer, as well as to identify the risk factors associated with postoperative complications. After conducting a comprehensive search within the medical records system, a total of 2508 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy and met the inclusion criteria were enrolled. Of the 2508 patients, 301 were diagnosed with postoperative complications. The pathological data, postoperative recovery, and survival outcome were compared between complication and control group. Subsequently, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identified the risk factors. According to the Clavien-Dindo grading criteria for postoperative complications, the proportions of grade I, II, III, IV, and V complications following radical gastrectomy were observed to be 28.2%, 42.9%, 19.6%, 8.0%, and 1.3%, respectively. The presence of postoperative complications significantly prolonged the duration of gastrointestinal decompression (P < 0.001), catheter retention (P < 0.001), fasting (P < 0.001), and hospitalization (P < 0.001). Additionally, it had a detrimental impact on survival outcomes. Age > 65years [odds ratio (OR) = 1.378, P = 0.020], presence of diabetes (OR = 2.042, P < 0.001), operative duration > 215 min (OR = 1.450, P = 0.006), intraoperative blood loss > 275 ml (OR = 1.474, P = 0.004), and Roux-en-Y anastomosis for both whole stomach (OR = 1.567, P = 0.021) and distal gastric cancer (OR = 2.083, P = 0.003) were identified as independent risk factors for postoperative complications. This study analyzed the complications and survival outcomes following radical gastrectomy, and investigated the predictors for postoperative complications, thereby providing valuable guidance on the prevention and management of surgical complications in gastric cancer.

Gastric cancer-Epidemiology, modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors, challenges and opportunities: An updated review

Gastric cancer represents a significant global health challenge due to its high mortality and incidence rates, particularly in Eastern Asia, Eastern Europe, and South America. This comprehensive review synthesizes the latest epidemiological data and explores both modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors associated with gastric cancer, aiming to delineate the multifactorial etiology of this disease. Modifiable risk factors include Helicobacter pylori infection, obesity, dietary habits, smoking and alcohol consumption, whereas nonmodifiable factors comprise genetic predispositions, age, family history and male gender. The interplay of these factors significantly impacts the risk and progression of gastric cancer, suggesting potential preventive strategies. The challenges in treating gastric cancer are considerable, largely because of the late-stage diagnosis and the heterogeneity of the disease, which complicate effective treatment regimens. Current treatment strategies involve a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted therapies. The FLOT regimen (5-FU, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin and Docetaxel) is now a standard for resectable cases in Europe and the US, showing superior survival and response rates over ECF and ECX regimens. For HER2-positive gastric cancer, trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy improves overall survival, as demonstrated by the ToGA trial. Additionally, immune checkpoint inhibitors like pembrolizumab and nivolumab offer promising results. However, the five-year survival rate remains low, underscoring the urgency for improved therapeutic approaches. Recent advancements in molecular biology and cancer genomics have begun to pave the way for personalized medicine in gastric cancer care, focusing on molecular targeted therapies and immunotherapy. This review also highlights the critical need for better screening methods that could facilitate early detection and treatment, potentially improving the prognosis. By integrating epidemiological insights with new therapeutic strategies, this article aims to thoroughly understand of gastric cancer's dynamics and outline a framework for future research and clinical management, advocating for a multidisciplinary approach to tackle this formidable disease.

Successful treatment of gastric cancer 10 years after heart transplantation: A case report

BACKGROUND

While survival rates among cardiac allograft recipients have improved, there has been a rise in post-transplant malignancies, with gastric cancer being less commonly reported. This study presented a successful treatment of gastric cancer in an individual 10 years after undergoing a heart transplant.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 66-year-old Chinese man presented to the gastrointestinal clinic with a complaint of diagnosis of gastric cancer for 4 months and treated with neoadjuvant therapy for 1 month. He has undergone orthotopic heart transplantation 10 years earlier due to a myocardial infarction. Physical examination and laboratory tests did not reveal any significant abnormalities. Abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) imaging indicated a gastric mass near the greater curvature, with gastroscopy suggesting a carcinoma at the esophagogastric junction, Siewert III. An echocardiogram indicated left atrial enlargement with mild mitral and tricuspid regurgitation. The diagnosis suggested that his gastric cancer at the esophagogastric junction was a consequence of long-term immunosuppressive therapy. A multidisciplinary team (MDT) consultation recommended a proximal radical gastrectomy. Postoperatively, the patient received 4 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with XELOX combined with Herceptin, initiated a month after surgery. During the 1-year follow-up, the patient showed commendable recovery, with no signs of tumor recurrence or metastasis.

CONCLUSION

This case underscores the potential risk of malignancy from immunosuppressive agents in transplant recipients. The successful management of this complex scenario underscores the indispensable role of an MDT approach in treating such unique and challenging cases.

Role of microsatellite instability and HER2 positivity in locally advanced esophago-gastric cancer patients treated with peri-operative chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) significantly improved the prognosis of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). Several biomarkers, including HER2 and MMR/MSI are crucial for treatment decisions in the advanced stage but, currently, no biomarkers can guide the choice of NAC in clinical practice. Our aim was to evaluate the role of MSI and HER2 status on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected LAGC patients treated with NAC and surgery +/- adjuvant chemotherapy from 2006 to 2018. HER2 and MSI were assessed on endoscopic and surgical samples. Pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, overall survival (OS), and event-free survival (EFS) were estimated and evaluated for association with downstaging and MSI.

RESULTS

We included 76 patients, 8% were classified as MSI-H, entirely consistent between endoscopic and surgical samples. Six percent of patients were HER2 positive on endoscopic and 4% on surgical samples. Tumor downstaging was observed in 52.5% of cases, with three pCR (5.1%), none in MSI-H cancers. According to MSI status, event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were higher for MSI-H patients to MSS [EFS not reached vs 30.0 months, p = 0.08; OS not reached vs 39.6 months, p = 0.10].

CONCLUSION

Our work confirms the positive prognostic effect of MSI-H in the curative setting of LAGC, not correlated with pathologic tumor downstaging. Prospective ad-hoc trial and tumor molecular profiling are eagerly needed.

Effect of multimodal chemotherapy on survival of gastric cancer with liver metastasis – a population based analysis

Objectives

Limited efforts have been made to evaluate the effect of multimodal chemotherapy on the survival of gastric cancer patients with liver metastases (LMGC). This study aimed to identify prognostic factors in LMGC patients and the superiority of multimodal chemotherapy with respect to overall survival (OS) in these patients.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1298 patients with M1 stage disease between January 2012 and December 2020. The effects of clinicopathological variables and preoperative chemotherapy (PECT), postoperative chemotherapy (POCT), and palliative chemotherapy on survival in patients with liver metastases (LM group) and non-liver metastases (non-LM group) were compared.

Results

Of the 1298 patients analysed, 546 (42.06%) were in the LM group and 752 (57.94%) were in the non-LM group. The median (interquartile range) age was 60 (51–66) years. The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates in the LM group were 29.3%, 13.9%, and 9.2%, respectively, and those in the non-LM group were. 38.2%, 17.4%, and 10.0%, respectively (P &lt; 0.05, &gt; 0.05, and &gt; 0.05, respectively.) The Cox proportional hazards model revealed that palliative chemotherapy was a significant independent prognostic factor in both the LM and non-LM groups. Age ≥55 years, N stage, and Lauren classification were also independent predictors of OS in the LM group (P &lt; 0.05). Palliative chemotherapy and POCT were associated with improved OS compared with PECT in the LM group (26.3% vs. 36.4% vs. 25.0%, P &lt; 0.001).

Conclusion

LMGC patients had a worse prognosis than non- LMGC. Number of metastatic sites more than 1, liver and other metastatic sites, no CT treatment and HER2-negative had a poor prognosis. LMGC patient may benefit more from palliative chemotherapy and POCT than from PECT. Further well-designed, prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

Combining neoadjuvant chemotherapy with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown promising prospects in locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC) immunotherapy, but their efficacy in neoadjuvant settings remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of integrating programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors into neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) of GC/GEJC treatment.

Methods

PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and main oncology conference databases were systematically searched up to 19 November 2022, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus NACT were included. The main outcomes were pathological complete response (pCR), major pathological response (MPR), R0 resection rate, and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).

Results

A total of 753 patients from 20 prospective studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled pCR and MPR rates from studies reporting were 21.7% [95% confidence interval (CI), 18.1%-25.5%] and 44.0% (95% CI, 34.1%-53.8%), respectively. The pooled incidence rate of total TRAEs was 89.1% (95% CI, 82.7%-94.3%), and the incidence rate of grade 3 to 4 TRAEs was 34.4% (95% CI, 17.8%-66.5%). The pooled R0 resection rate was reported to be 98.9% (95% CI, 97.0%-99.9%). Subgroup analysis has not found significant differences in efficacy and safety among different PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Moreover, the efficacy in patients with positive PD-L1 expression (combined positive score ≥1) was comparable with that in the entire study population [pCR, 22.5% vs. 21.2% (p > 0.05); MPR, 48.6% vs. 43.7% (p > 0.05)].

Conclusion

This systematic review and meta-analysis found that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with NACT for locally advanced GC/GEJC were well tolerated and may confer therapeutic advantages. The integration of ICIs into NACT has shown the potential for application in any PD-L1 expression population.