Is Small Cell Lung Cancer a Surgical Disease at the Present Time?

Preparation of etoposide liposomes for enhancing antitumor efficacy on small cell lung cancer and reducing hematotoxicity of drugs

Etoposide (VP16) is commonly used in the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in clinical practice. However, severe adverse reactions such as bone marrow suppression toxicity limit its clinical application. Although several studies on VP16 liposomes were reported, no significant improvement in bone marrow suppression toxicity has been found, and there was a lack of validation of animal models for in vivo antitumor effects. Therefore, we attempted to develop a PEGylated liposomal formulation that effectively encapsulated VP16 (VP16-LPs) and evaluated its therapeutic effect and toxicity at the cellular level and in animal models. First, we optimized the preparation process of VP16-LPs using an orthogonal experimental design and further prepared them into freeze-dried powder to improve storage stability of the product. Results showed that VP16-LPs freeze-dried powder exhibited good dispersibility and stability after redispersion. In addition, compared to marketed VP16 injection, VP16-LPs exhibited sustained drug release characteristics. At the cellular level, VP16-LPs enhanced the cellular uptake of drugs and exhibited strong cytotoxic activity. In animal models, VP16-LPs could target and aggregate in tumors and exhibit a higher anti-tumor effect than VP16-injection after intravenous injection. Most importantly, hematological analysis results showed that VP16-LPs significantly alleviated the bone marrow suppression toxicity of drug. In summary, our study confirmed that PEGylated liposomes could enhance therapeutic efficacy and reduce toxicity of VP16, which demonstrated that VP16-LPs had enormous clinical application potential.

Significance of marginal vessels in differentiating peripheral small-cell lung cancer and benign lung tumor

BACKGROUND

Some peripheral small cell lung cancers (pSCLCs) and benign lung tumors (pBLTs) have similar morphological features but different treatment and prognosis.

PURPOSE

To determine the significance of marginal vessels in differentiating pSCLCs and pBLTs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 57 and 95 patients with pathological confirmed nodular (≤3 cm) pSCLC and pBLT with similar morphological features were enrolled in this study retrospectively. The patients' clinical characteristics and computed tomography (CT) features of tumors and marginal vessels (vessels connecting with tumors) were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

Compared with pBLTs, pSCLCs had a larger diameter (P = 0.001) but lower enhancement (P = 0.015) and fewer had calcification (P = 0.013). Compared with pBLTs, more lesions had proximal (70.2% vs. 22.1%) and distal (59.6% vs. 4.2%) marginal vessels in pSCLCs (each P < 0.0001). In addition, in pSCLCs, the numbers of proximal (1.3 ± 1.4 vs. 0.3 ± 0.6), distal (2.4 ± 3.1 vs. 0.1 ± 0.5), and total (3.6 ± 3.5 vs. 0.4 ± 1.0) marginal vessels were all more than those in pBLTs (each P < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed the positive distal marginal vessel sign had the highest specificity (95.8%), and the number of total marginal vessels had the best performance in discriminating pSCLC from pBLT (cutoff value = 1.5, AUC = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.72-0.89, sensitivity = 70.2%, and specificity = 91.6%).

CONCLUSION

For peripheral solid nodules similar to pBLTs but without any calcification, the possibility of pSCLC should be considered if they have multiple marginal vessels (≥2), especially the distal ones.

Long-term survival in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer treated with different immune checkpoint inhibitors in multiple-line therapies: A case report and literature review

Background

Extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) is highly malignant, is highly prone to recurrence, and has a short survival period. It is very difficult to achieve long-term survival in ES-SCLC, which has not been significantly improved in the last 20 years. For a long time, platinum-based chemotherapy has occupied the core position in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), but there are few options for treatment drugs or regimens, and if disease progression occurs, the options for follow-up regimens are obviously limited. The advent of immunotherapy has changed this situation to some extent, and immunotherapy has shown some effects in improving efficiency and prolonging survival, whether in first- or third-line therapy, but it is still unsatisfactory.

Case presentation

A 57-year-old patient with ES-SCLC experienced disease progression after four lines of treatment including synchronous radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and antiangiogenesis. However, the patient still benefited when switching to the programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitor toripalimab in combination with chemotherapy in the fifth line. Even after the development of immune resistance, the patient still benefited after switching to tislelizumab in combination with different chemotherapy regimens or alone in the sixth and seventh lines. Following the progression of tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy, the patient again profited after switching to durvalumab in combination with anlotinib and again achieved a progressive-free survival (PFS) of 11 months. Overall, the patient achieved a total of 45 months of PFS and 50 months of overall survival (OS), with a shocking and exciting 30 months of PFS achieved in the immune combination phase alone.

Conclusion

We report a patient with ES-SCLC who achieved long-term survival after at least eight lines of therapy including chemotherapy, antiangiogenesis, and different immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). This suggests that long-term survival in SCLC is possible with aggressive, combined, and standardized treatment. Otherwise, immunotherapy postline enablement can still benefit patients, rechallenge after immune resistance is also possible in SCLC, and combination with chemotherapy or antiangiogenic therapy can improve the efficacy and prolong the survival. This will provide new ideas and options for the selection of treatment options for SCLC.

Different clinical characteristics and survival between surgically resected pure and combined small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is the most malignant and common form of neuroendocrine lung cancer with pure (P-SCLC) and combined subtypes (C-SCLC). However, little is known about the differences between these two groups and in this study we aimed to provide a more comprehensive insight into SCLC.

METHODS

Data from 580 postoperative patients with pathologically confirmed SCLC in Shanghai Chest Hospital from January 2010 to December 2020 were collected retrospectively. The clinical characteristics and prognosis were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 357 P-SCLC patients and 223 C-SCLC patients were included. The results indicated that P-SCLC appeared to have a higher proportion of being located in the middle lobe than C-SCLC. The incidences of P-SCLC in patients with visceral pleural invasion (VPI) and in stage II were higher than C-SCLC, while C-SCLC was more likely to be accompanied by higher incidences of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement, and higher levels of CEA, SCCA and CYFRA21-1 than P-SCLC. The most common were SCLC combined with large cell neuroendocrine components among 223 C-SCLCs. Survival analysis confirmed a more favorable disease-free survival (DFS) (p = 0.016) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.024) in patients with P-SCLCs compared with C-SCLCs. Histological type, tumor location, pN stage, adjuvant chemotherapy, serum NSE and CA125 levels were independent risk factors for survival rate in SCLC. In addition, adjuvant chemotherapy was beneficial in improving stage I P-SCLC and C-SCLC DFS and OS rates, and similar results were not seen in adjuvant radiation therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with C-SCLC have a poorer prognosis than P-SCLC patients. We determined that large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma was the most common additional component of C-SCLC, and patients with this component appeared to have a longer DFS and OS than other combined components.