Patient-reported outcomes associated with changing to rivaroxaban for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism - The COSIMO study

Challenging Situations in the Treatment of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis

Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is a common clinical problem in the treatment of cancer patients posing some unique challenges. These include the need to balance between the risk of recurrent thromboembolic events and bleeding complications in the individual cancer patient. A frequently encountered dilemma is the need for long-term anticoagulation in the setting of active malignancy. Until now, optimal duration, intensity, and type of anticoagulation in cancer patients remain an area of ongoing debate. In this case-based review, we present several challenging clinical scenarios and provide guidance on management. For optimal treatment results, CAT generally requires a multidisciplinary approach including specialists for thrombosis and hemostasis as well as hematology and oncology. Individual patient preferences should always be taken into account, especially in clinical situations with weak treatment evidence.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for postoperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients with gynecologic malignancies: A quality mini-review

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in gynecologic oncology patients with an increased risk in the postoperative period. Historically, international guidelines have recommended 28 days of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin (UFH) for extended VTE prophylaxis after major abdominal and pelvic surgery for gynecologic malignancies. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as an attractive alternative to injectable anticoagulants. This quality mini-review evaluated the literature around the use of DOACs for postoperative VTE prophylaxis after surgery for gynecologic cancer. Overall, the reviewed literature supports the use of DOACs in select patients within this population which may lead to an improved patient experience, higher rates of treatment compliance, and increased cost savings.

Treating cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: A practical approach

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common and potentially life-threatening complication in patients with cancer. Both cancer and its treatments increase the risk of developing VTE. Specific cancer types and individual patient comorbidities increase the risk of developing cancer-associated VTE, and the risk of bleeding is increased with anticoagulation therapies. The aims of this article are to summarize the latest evidence for treating cancer-associated VTE, discuss the practical considerations involved, and share best practices for VTE treatment in patients with cancer. The article pays particular attention to challenging contexts including patients with brain, lung, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary tumors and those with hematological malignancies. Furthermore, the article summarizes specific clinical scenarios that require additional treatment considerations, including extremes of body weight, nausea and gastrointestinal disturbances, compromised renal function, and anemia, and touches upon the relevance of drug-drug interactions. Historically, vitamin K antagonists and low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) have been used as therapy for cancer-associated VTE. The development of direct oral anticoagulants has provided additional treatment options, which, in certain instances, offer advantages over LMWHs. There are numerous factors that need to be considered when treating cancer-associated VTE, and although various treatment guidelines are helpful, they do not reflect each unique scenario that may arise in clinical practice. This article provides a summary of the latest evidence and a practical approach for treating cancer-associated VTE.

Effectiveness and safety of continuous low-molecular-weight heparin versus switching to direct oral anticoagulants in cancer-associated venous thrombosis

Given the existing uncertainty regarding the effectiveness and safety of switching from low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with cancer-associated venous thrombosis (CAT), we conducted a comprehensive population-based cohort study utilizing electronic health database in Hong Kong. A total of 4356 patients with CAT between 2010 and 2022 were included, with 1700 (39.0%) patients switching to DOAC treatment. Compared to continuous LMWH treatment, switching to DOACs was associated with a significantly lower risk of hospitalization due to venous thromboembolism (HR: 0.49 [95% CI = 0.35-0.68]) and all-cause mortality (HR: 0.67 [95% CI = 0.61-0.74]), with no significant difference in major bleeding (HR: 1.04 [95% CI = 0.83-1.31]) within six months. These findings provide reassurance regarding the effectiveness and safety of switching from LMWH to DOACs among patients with CAT, including vulnerable patient groups.

Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Gynecologic Oncology: A MITO-MaNGO Survey

Cancer-associated thrombosis is the second leading cause of death in cancer patients, and its incidence has been increasing in recent years. This survey was aimed at gathering information regarding the management of thromboembolic prophylaxis within the MITO (Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer)-MaNGO (Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology) groups. We designed a self-administered, multiple-choice online questionnaire available only for MITO-MaNGO members for one month, starting in May 2022 and ending in June 2022. We processed one response form per center, and 50 responses were analyzed, with most of the respondents (78%) over 40 years old. We found that 82% of them consider thromboembolic prophylaxis in gynecologic oncology to be relevant. In 82% of the centers, a standardized protocol on venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis is used, which is applied to both patients undergoing surgery and those undergoing chemotherapy. In the remaining 18% of centers, prophylaxis is used exclusively for patients undergoing chemotherapy treatment. Prophylaxis of patients undergoing surgery and chemotherapy treatment is managed in most cases by the surgeon (72%) and oncologist (76%), respectively. Only 26% of respondents use a thromboembolic risk assessment scale, and of these, those used are the Caprini Score (6%), Khorana Score (6%), and Wells Score (2%). The respondents have good knowledge of low-molecular-weight heparin (90%) and average knowledge of dicumarolics (40%), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) (68%), and antiplatelet agents (40%). The results of our survey indicate that there is a good awareness of thromboembolic prophylaxis in gynecologic oncology. Nevertheless, it is used less in outpatients than in patients undergoing surgery. Moreover, the thromboembolic risk assessment scores are barely used.

[Translation into French and republication of: "Anticoagulant treatment of cancer-associated thromboembolism"]

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent and potentially fatal complication in patients with cancer. During the initial period after the thromboembolic event, a patient receiving anticoagulant treatment is exposed both to a risk of VTE recurrence and also to an elevated bleeding risk conferred by the treatment. For this reason, the choice of anticoagulant is critical. The choice should take into account patient-related factors (such as functional status, age, body mass index, platelet count and renal function), VTE-related factors (such as severity or site), cancer-related factors (such as activity and progression) and treatment related factors (such as drug-drug interactions), which all potentially influence bleeding risk, and patient preference. These should be evaluated carefully for each patient during a multidisciplinary team meeting. For most patients, apixaban or a low molecular-weight heparin is the most appropriate initial choice for anticoagulant treatment. Such treatment should be offered to all patients with active cancer for at least 6months. The patient and treatment should be re-evaluated regularly, and anticoagulant treatment changed when necessary. Continued anticoagulant treatment beyond 6months is justified if the cancer remains active or if the patient experienced recurrence of VTE in the first 6months. In other cases, the interest of continued anticoagulant treatment may be considered on an individual patient basis in collaboration with oncologists.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) use for prolonged venous thromboembolism prophylaxis following surgery for gynaecological malignancies in Australia and New Zealand - A clinician survey

BACKGROUND

Current international guidelines recommend 28 days of enoxaparin as venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis after surgery for gynaecologic cancer. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been investigated as an alternative to enoxaparin for post-operative VTE prophylaxis. High-quality evidence to demonstrate safety and efficacy is lacking.

AIMS

We aim to investigate the current practice regarding VTE prophylaxis among gynaecological oncologists in Australia and New Zealand following laparotomy for gynaecological malignancy, in particular the use of DOACs for VTE prophylaxis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-seven practising gynaecologic oncologists (GO) were identified through Royal Australia and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists database and emailed online surveys that asked about VTE prophylaxis practice and views of DOACs in this setting. Data were then collected through Survey Monkey and evaluated.

RESULTS

The majority (77.1%) routinely prescribed 28 days of enoxaparin following laparotomy for gynaecological malignancies. In clinical circumstance such as laparoscopy for gynaecological malignancies and surgery for vulva malignancies, there was variation in thromboprophylaxis practices. No GO reported routine use of DOACs in any clinical circumstance. There were 56% of GOs who used a DOAC in their practice at some point. Barriers to routine use of DOACs in current practice included insufficient evidence (68%), issue with cost (40.4%) and concerns about safety (29.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Enoxaparin prescribed for 28 days remains the current clinical practice in preventing VTE following laparotomy for gynaecological malignancy. The main barrier to routine DOAC use as post-operative thromboprophylaxis is a lack of evidence which reflects the need for a larger prospective study.

Anticoagulant treatment of cancer-associated thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent and potentially fatal complication in patients with cancer. During the initial period after the thromboembolic event, a patient receiving anticoagulant treatment is exposed both to a risk of VTE recurrence and also to an elevated bleeding risk conferred by the treatment. For this reason, the choice of anticoagulant is critical. The choice should take into account patient-related factors (such as functional status, age, body mass index, platelet count and renal function), VTE-related factors (such as severity or site), cancer-related factors (such as activity and progression) and treatment-related factors (such as drug-drug interactions), which all potentially influence bleeding risk, and patient preference. These should be evaluated carefully for each patient during a multidisciplinary team meeting. For most patients, apixaban or a low molecular-weight heparin is the most appropriate initial choice for anticoagulant treatment. Such treatment should be offered to all patients with active cancer for at least six months. The patient and treatment should be re-evaluated regularly and anticoagulant treatment changed when necessary. Continued anticoagulant treatment beyond six months is justified if the cancer remains active or if the patient experienced recurrence of VTE in the first six months. In other cases, the interest of continued anticoagulant treatment may be considered on an individual patient basis in collaboration with oncologists.

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review of the Literature, Current Challenges, and Ways Forward

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) affects >1.2 million Americans annually. Although the clinical outcomes and economic burdens of VTE have been well described, the impact of VTE on patients' health status has yet to be summarized. This systematic review summarizes how patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been used in VTE to date.

METHODS AND RESULTS

PubMed/MEDLINE was queried for literature published through March 2023 using PROMs in a population of patients with VTE. Studies were excluded if the reference was an editorial, review, or case report, or if the study included patients with conditions other than VTE. Qualitative analyses were performed. After screening and exclusion, 136 references were identified; 5 described PROM development, 20 focused on PROM validation, and 111 used PROMs in outcomes research. The most used generic PROMs were the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey and EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire, and the most common disease-specific PROMs were the Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study-Quality of Life/Symptoms and the Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life Questionnaire. PROMs were used to quantify the changes in health status after diagnosis, characterize the trajectory of subsequent improvement, and identify drivers of continued impairments in health status like postthrombotic syndrome and postpulmonary embolism syndrome. PROMs were also used to investigate the impact of novel treatment modalities on quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

This review demonstrates the many benefits of PROM use, including quantifying changes in health status with treatment, capturing patients' experiences with the treatment itself, and identifying complications of VTE. Incorporating PROMs into VTE care will be an essential component of evaluating the effectiveness of novel therapies and should lead to improved shared decision-making for patients with VTE.

Intensify Standardized Anticoagulation for Cancer-associated Pulmonary Embolism: From Single-center Real-world Data

PURPOSE

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a significant contributor to mortality in patients with cancer. Although anticoagulation serves as the cornerstone of treatment for cancer-associated PE, it has not been emphasized in real-world settings. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of suboptimal anticoagulant treatment on the prognosis of cancer-associated PE.

METHODS

A cohort of 356 individuals newly diagnosed with acute PE were enrolled. The primary outcome of the study was recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), and the secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality and major bleeding (consisting of a reduction in the hemoglobin level by at least 20 g/L, transfusion of at least 2 units of blood, or symptomatic bleeding in a critical area or organ or fatal bleeding).

FINDINGS

Of the total participants, 156 (43.8%) were diagnosed with cancer. A comparison between the cancer and noncancer groups revealed that patients with cancer were more frequently asymptomatic (41.0% vs 4.5%; P < 0.001), less likely to have right ventricular dysfunction (4.5% vs 14.0%; P = 0.001), received less anticoagulant treatment during hospitalization (85.3% vs 98.5%; P < 0.001), and had a shorter duration of anticoagulation (5.02 [7.40] months vs 14.19 [10.65] months; P < 0.001). In addition, patients with cancer were found to be at a higher risk of recurrent VTE (17.3% vs 4.0%; P < 0.001) and all-cause mortality (23.7% vs 10.5%; P = 0.001). Multiple Cox regression analysis indicated that discontinuation of anticoagulation at 3 months was a significant risk factor for recurrent VTE in the cancer group (HR, 15.815; 95% CI, 3.047-82.079; P = 0.001).

IMPLICATIONS

The brief duration of anticoagulation therapy and elevated likelihood of recurrent VTE serve as cautionary indicators for the need to enhance awareness of standardized anticoagulant treatment for cancer-associated PE. The ultimate goal is to enhance patient prognosis and quality of life.

A consensus viewpoint on the role of direct factor Xa inhibitors in the management of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism in the UK

OBJECTIVE

Cancer patients are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), a significant cause of cancer-related death. Historically, low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) were the gold standard therapy for cancer-associated VTE, but recent evidence supports the use of direct factor Xa inhibitors in cancer-associated VTE and this is now reflected in many guidelines. However, uptake of direct factor Xa inhibitors varies and guidance on the use of direct factor Xa inhibitors in specific cancer sub-populations and clinical situations is lacking. This review presents consensus expert opinion alongside evaluation of evidence to support healthcare professionals in the use of direct factor Xa inhibitors in cancer-associated VTE.

METHODS

Recent guidelines, meta-analyses, reviews and clinical studies on anticoagulation therapy for cancer-associated VTE were used to direct clinically relevant topics and evidence to be systematically discussed using nominal group technique. The consensus manuscript and recommendations were developed based on these discussions.

RESULTS

Considerations when prescribing anticoagulant therapy for cancer-associated VTE include cancer site and stage, systemic anti-cancer therapy (including vascular access), drug-drug interactions, length of anticoagulation, quality of life and needs during palliative care. Treatment of patients with kidney or liver impairment, gastrointestinal disorders, extremes of bodyweight, elevated bleeding or recurrence risk, VTE recurrence and COVID-19 is discussed.

CONCLUSION

Anticoagulant therapy for cancer-associated VTE patients should be carefully selected with consideration given to the relative benefits of specific drugs when individualizing care. Direct factor Xa inhibitors are typically the treatment of choice for preventing VTE recurrence in non-cancer patients and should also be considered as such for cancer-associated VTE in most situations.

Rivaroxaban bei tumorassoziierter venöser Thromboembolie

Diese Übersichtsarbeit beschreibt Erkenntnisse zur Prävention und Therapie der tumorassoziierten venösen Thromboembolie (VTE) mit direkten Faktor-Xa-Inhibitoren (FXaI) und bezieht sich insbesondere auf das Studienprogramm CALLISTO mit Rivaroxaban. CALLISTO umfasst randomisierte klinische Prüfungen unterschiedlicher Fragestellungen sowie Real-World-Evidenz.

Prävention und Therapie der tumorassoziierten VTE beruhten bisher auf niedermolekul1933aren Heparinen (NMH). Randomisierte kontrollierte Studien zeigten nun eine vergleichbare bis überlegene Wirksamkeit von FXaI vs. NMH. Die Erkenntnisse finden mittlerweile Eingang in Empfehlungen und Leitlinien. Zu beachten ist ein ggf. erhöhtes Blutungsrisiko, vor allem bei Patienten mit nicht resezierten gastrointestinalen oder urogenitalen Tumoren. Dieses wurde bei der Therapie mit FXaI zuerst beobachtet, kann jedoch auch NMH betreffen. Der Selektion geeigneter Patienten und der Optimierung von Behandlungspfaden kommt daher eine hohe Bedeutung zu.

Practical Considerations for the Management of Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Guide for the General Oncology Practitioner

Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism is a devastating complication of cancer and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The cornerstone of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism treatment is anticoagulation, and in recent years, there have been notable randomized clinical trials that have revealed insights into the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants and low-molecular-weight heparin in the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis. Deciding on the ideal anticoagulation treatment plan for a patient with a cancer-associated thrombosis is a complex task that requires an understanding of clinical trial data, society guidelines, and, most importantly, consideration of many cancer-related, treatment-related, and patient-related factors. This article summarizes important factors to consider when deciding on anticoagulation therapy for a patient with cancer-associated thrombosis.

Venous Thromboembolism and Cancer: A Comprehensive Review from Pathophysiology to Novel Treatment

Acute thrombotic events can unveil occult cancer, as they are its first manifestation in about 20 to 30% of all cases. Malignancy interacts in an intricate way with the hemostatic system, promoting both thrombosis and bleeding. The main pathway involved in these reactions involves the activation of tumor-associated procoagulant factors, which eventually results in clot formation. The clinical manifestation of cancer-related thrombotic events mainly involves the venous side, and manifests in a broad spectrum of conditions, including unusual sites of venous thrombosis. The selection of patients who have a balanced risk–benefit profile for management of anticoagulation is complex, given individual patient goals and preferences, different prognosis of specific cancers, common comorbidities, potential drug–drug interactions, underweight states, and the competing risks of morbidity and mortality. Anticoagulant treatment in cancer settings is broadly debated, considering the potential application of direct oral anticoagulants in both thromboprophylaxis and secondary prevention, having demonstrated its efficacy and safety compared to conventional treatment. This review aims to provide a brief overview of the pathophysiology and management of cancer-related thrombosis, summarizing the results obtained in recent clinical trials.

Use of direct oral anticoagulants for postoperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after surgery for gynecologic malignancies

Venous thromboembolism is a preventable cause of postoperative mortality in patients undergoing surgery for malignancy. Current standard of care based on international guideline recommends 28 days of extended thromboprophylaxis after major abdominal and pelvic surgery for malignancies with unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin. Direct oral anticoagulants have been approved for the treatment of venous thromboembolism in the general population. This regimen has a significant advantage over other types of anticoagulation regimens, particularly being administered by non-parenteral routes and without the need for laboratory monitoring. In this review, we evaluate the role of direct anticoagulation and provide an update on completed and ongoing clinical trials.