[Translation into French and republication of: "Anticoagulant treatment of cancer-associated thromboembolism"]

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent and potentially fatal complication in patients with cancer. During the initial period after the thromboembolic event, a patient receiving anticoagulant treatment is exposed both to a risk of VTE recurrence and also to an elevated bleeding risk conferred by the treatment. For this reason, the choice of anticoagulant is critical. The choice should take into account patient-related factors (such as functional status, age, body mass index, platelet count and renal function), VTE-related factors (such as severity or site), cancer-related factors (such as activity and progression) and treatment related factors (such as drug-drug interactions), which all potentially influence bleeding risk, and patient preference. These should be evaluated carefully for each patient during a multidisciplinary team meeting. For most patients, apixaban or a low molecular-weight heparin is the most appropriate initial choice for anticoagulant treatment. Such treatment should be offered to all patients with active cancer for at least 6months. The patient and treatment should be re-evaluated regularly, and anticoagulant treatment changed when necessary. Continued anticoagulant treatment beyond 6months is justified if the cancer remains active or if the patient experienced recurrence of VTE in the first 6months. In other cases, the interest of continued anticoagulant treatment may be considered on an individual patient basis in collaboration with oncologists.

Towards optimal use of antithrombotic therapy of people with cancer at the end of life: A research protocol for the development and implementation of the SERENITY shared decision support tool

BACKGROUND

Even though antithrombotic therapy has probably little or even negative effects on the well-being of people with cancer during their last year of life, deprescribing antithrombotic therapy at the end of life is rare in practice. It is often continued until death, possibly resulting in excess bleeding, an increased disease burden and higher healthcare costs.

METHODS

The SERENITY consortium comprises researchers and clinicians from eight European countries with specialties in different clinical fields, epidemiology and psychology. SERENITY will use a comprehensive approach combining a realist review, flash mob research, epidemiological studies, and qualitative interviews. The results of these studies will be used in a Delphi process to reach a consensus on the optimal design of the shared decision support tool. Next, the shared decision support tool will be tested in a randomised controlled trial. A targeted implementation and dissemination plan will be developed to enable the use of the SERENITY tool across Europe, as well as its incorporation in clinical guidelines and policies. The entire project is funded by Horizon Europe.

RESULTS

SERENITY will develop an information-driven shared decision support tool that will facilitate treatment decisions regarding the appropriate use of antithrombotic therapy in people with cancer at the end of life.

CONCLUSIONS

We aim to develop an intervention that guides the appropriate use of antithrombotic therapy, prevents bleeding complications, and saves healthcare costs. Hopefully, usage of the tool leads to enhanced empowerment and improved quality of life and treatment satisfaction of people with advanced cancer and their care givers.

Adult breast, lung, pancreatic, upper and lower gastrointestinal cancer patients with hospitalized venous thromboembolism in the national French hospital discharge database

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) and cancer are strongly associated. In France, evidence on patients with pancreatic, upper GI [gastrointestinal], lower GI, lung, or breast cancer-associated VTE and their hospital management is limited. The aims of this study were to provide data on the number of hospitalized VTE events among cancer patients, the patients' characteristics, and their hospital management to estimate the burden of disease and the hospital burden of cancer-related VTE and to provide guidance on research.

METHODS

This longitudinal, observational, and retrospective study was based on the comprehensive hospital discharge database (PMSI). Adult patients (≥ 18 years old) hospitalized with a cancer of interest in 2016 and hospitalized (within 2 years with VTE (captured a as a principal, related, or significant associated diagnosis) were included in the study.

RESULTS

We identified 340,946 cancer patients, of which 7.2% (24,433 patients) were hospitalized with VTE. The proportions of hospitalized VTE were 14.6% (3,237) for patients with pancreatic cancer, 11.2% (8,339) for lung cancer, 9.9% (2,232) for upper GI cancer, 6.7% (7,011) for lower GI cancer, and 3.1% (3,614) for breast cancer. Around two thirds of cancer patients with a hospitalized VTE had active cancer (with metastases and/or receiving chemotherapy during the six months prior to the index date): from 62% of patients with pancreatic cancer to 72% with breast cancer. Around a third of patients were admitted to the hospital through the emergency room, up to 3% of patients stayed in an intensive care unit. The average length of stay ranged from 10 (breast cancer) to 15 days (upper GI cancer). Nine (lower GI cancer) to 18% (pancreatic cancer) of patients died during the VTE hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

The burden of cancer-associated VTE is substantial, both in terms of the number of patients affected and in the hospital use. These findings offer guidance on future research on VTE prophylaxis in a very high-risk population, particularly in patients with active cancer.

[Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis in Acutely Ill Hospitalized Medical Patients]

Venous thromboembolic events (VTE) occur in approximately 50% of cases during or following hospitalization; VTE are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Thromboprophylaxis for 6 to 14 days with heparins or fondaparinux has been demonstrated to be effective in VTE prevention in patients hospitalized for acute medical illnesses and reduced mobility. Nevertheless, the level of recommendation has been gradually downgraded as the benefit has been mainly demonstrated on the basis of systematic imaging diagnosed events. Direct oral anticoagulants have been assessed only as an extended prophylaxis, and are currently not recommended in medical thromboprophylaxis. Assessing the risk of VTE and bleeding in medical patients is complex. VTE and bleeding risk assessment scores were constructed but have not been validated. In order to improve the adequacy of prescriptions for thromboprophylaxis, the impact of different interventions has been the subject of several studies but these yielded varying results. The aim of this review is to analyze the indications for thromboprophylaxis in a medical setting with the latest available data.

Comparative clinical prognosis of massive and non-massive pulmonary embolism: A registry-based cohort study

AIMS

Little is known about the prognosis of patients with massive pulmonary embolism (PE) and its risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) compared with non-massive PE, which may inform clinical decisions. Our aim was to compare the risk of recurrent VTE, bleeding, and mortality after massive and non-massive PE during anticoagulation and after its discontinuation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We included all participants in the RIETE registry who suffered a symptomatic, objectively confirmed segmental or more central PE. Massive PE was defined by a systolic hypotension at clinical presentation (<90 mm Hg). We compared the risks of recurrent VTE, major bleeding, and mortality using time-to-event multivariable competing risk modeling. There were 3.5% of massive PE among 38 996 patients with PE. During the anticoagulation period, massive PE was associated with a greater risk of major bleeding (subhazard ratio [sHR] 1.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-2.32), but not of recurrent VTE (sHR 1.15, 95% CI 0.75-1.74) than non-massive PE. An increased risk of mortality was only observed in the first month after PE. After discontinuation of anticoagulation, among 11 579 patients, massive PE and non-massive PE had similar risks of mortality, bleeding, and recurrent VTE (sHR 0.85, 95% CI 0.51-1.40), but with different case fatality of recurrent PE (11.1% versus 2.4%, P = .03) and possibly different risk of recurrent fatal PE (sHR 3.65, 95% CI 0.82-16.24).

CONCLUSION

In this large prospective registry, the baseline hemodynamic status of the incident PE did not influence the risk of recurrent VTE, during and after the anticoagulation periods, but was possibly associated with recurrent PE of greater severity.

Educational diagnosis of patients under oral anticoagulant therapy: Development of a 4-category patient profiling score based on a retrospective study and prospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Oral anticoagulants are used in numerous pathologies and their consumption is growing. However, to prevent their occurrence, their use should be supervised and the patients educated. Patients vary in understanding and compliance. Therefore, it seems necessary to standardize educational diagnosis with a patient profiling score to adapt therapeutic education to the individual patient profile.

METHOD

A retrospective study based on observation of consecutive patients treated by an oral anticoagulant therapy and involved in a therapeutic education program conducted between October 2014 and December 2015. A 12-item questionnaire distinguished 4 profiles based on the educational diagnosis. In a prospective double-blind study including consecutive patients with an indication to anticoagulants and admitted to the Internal Medicine department of the Louis-Mourier Hospital (AP-HP, University of Paris), the patient's profile defined by a clinician using the questionnaire was compared to the one defined by the Therapeutic Education Leader after standardized educational diagnosis.

RESULTS

The questionnaire was tested prospectively in 53 patients, 26 of which had also a complete therapeutic education by the TEP leader. In any case, the assessment assisted by the questionnaire succeeded in identifying the patient profile, as determined by the therapeutic education specialist.

CONCLUSION

The present questionnaire helps identify different patient profiles and therefore standardize educational diagnosis. The perspective is to adapt therapeutic education to individual patient profile, with the objective to improve compliance.

D-dimer levels and risk of recurrence following provoked venous thromboembolism: findings from the RIETE registry

BACKGROUND

Patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) secondary to transient risk factors may develop VTE recurrences after discontinuing anticoagulation. Identifying at-risk patients could help to guide the duration of therapy.

METHODS

We used the RIETE database to assess the prognostic value of d-dimer testing after discontinuing anticoagulation to identify patients at increased risk for recurrences. Transient risk factors were classified as major (postoperative) or minor (pregnancy, oestrogen use, immobilization or recent travel).

RESULTS

In December 2018, 1655 VTE patients with transient risk factors (major 460, minor 1195) underwent d-dimer measurements after discontinuing anticoagulation. Amongst patients with major risk factors, the recurrence rate was 5.74 (95% CI: 3.19-9.57) events per 100 patient-years in those with raised d-dimer levels and 2.68 (95% CI: 1.45-4.56) in those with normal levels. Amongst patients with minor risk factors, the rates were 7.79 (95% CI: 5.71-10.4) and 3.34 (95% CI: 2.39-4.53), respectively. Patients with major risk factors and raised d-dimer levels (n = 171) had a nonsignificantly higher rate of recurrences (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.14; 95% CI: 0.96-4.79) than those with normal levels. Patients with minor risk factors and raised d-dimer levels (n = 382) had a higher rate of recurrences (HR: 2.34; 95% CI: 1.51-3.63) than those with normal levels. On multivariate analysis, raised d-dimers (HR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.09-2.77) were associated with an increased risk for recurrences in patients with minor risk factors, not in those with major risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with raised d-dimer levels after discontinuing anticoagulant therapy for VTE provoked by a minor transient risk factor were at an increased risk for recurrences.

Prevention and treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis in France: A national survey among vascular disease and supportive care specialists

BACKGROUND/AIM

Long-term use of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) has been well-established. Conversely, the use of thromboprophylaxis in patients with cancer remains controversial in the absence of homogeneous guidelines. Our aim was to assess the awareness of treatment guidelines and the management of patients with CAT in daily clinical practice.

METHODS

A national survey based on an open questionnaire developed by a panel of health professionals including specialists in vascular medicine, oncology, supportive care and pharmacy, was proposed on line to 2104 specialists experts in the management of CAT with the objective to collect at least 400 answers. Clinical practice assessment included the treatment of lung adenocarcinoma-associated thrombosis, the use of thromboprophylaxis and factors influencing the management of patients with CAT.

RESULTS

A total of 401 questionnaires were completed by specialists of vascular medicine (68%), oncology (12%) and other (20%). LMWH was the preferred option for over 90% of the participants for the treatment of recent overt proximal pulmonary embolism or deep-vein thrombosis. Up to 70% of the participants considered treatment duration for 6 months and more than 12 months in case of active malignancy. Patient management in the setting of incidental VTE and thromboprophylaxis were heterogeneous in the absence of clear guidance while VTE risk scores would be used by only 14% of participants.

CONCLUSION

Patients with CAT are properly managed based on clear and consistent guidelines. Patient care is heterogeneous regarding treatment duration beyond 6 months and thromboprophylaxis while VTE risk scores are misused. Identification of referent health care professionals for CAT management and more clear guidelines are required.

Long-term treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis: the choice of the optimal anticoagulant

Patients with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) carry a higher risk of recurrence, bleeding and mortality as compared with non-cancer patients. The specific profiles of cancer patients, combining frequent co-morbidities, the use of anti-tumoral therapies and the cancer progression itself, represent a major therapeutic challenge for choosing a long-term anticoagulant treatment. This review discusses the practical basis of making a choice between the available drugs for a long-term antithrombotic strategy, linked to their pharmacology, mechanism of action, evidence of clinical benefits, and advantages and limitations in such a complex clinical context. In patients with cancer, low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) are the preferred option for the secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism according to current guidelines, because their efficacy is significantly superior to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Even though LMWHs are effective and safe in cancer patients, they require daily subcutaneous injections, which may be problematic for a long-term therapy that may exceed 6 months' duration. Compared with VKAs, non-vitamin-K antagonist oral anticoagulants or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are more target specific and do not require laboratory monitoring, whereas the oral route of administration makes them potentially attractive alternatives to LMWH. In randomized controlled trials in the general population DOACs have been shown to be non-inferior to VKAs in terms of efficacy with a lower rate of clinically relevant or major bleeding. However, given the limited number of cancer patients enrolled in these studies (with poorly defined active cancer), available trials are inconclusive regarding the usefulness of DOACs in the cancer setting. Ongoing head-to-head comparisons vs. LMWH in patients with CAT may allow an informed choice to be made regarding the DOAC option.

Outcome of Patients with Venous Thromboembolism and Factor V Leiden or Prothrombin 20210 Carrier Mutations During the Course of Anticoagulation

BACKGROUND

Individuals with factor V Leiden or prothrombin G20210A mutations are at a higher risk to develop venous thromboembolism. However, the influence of these polymorphisms on patient outcome during anticoagulant therapy has not been consistently explored.

METHODS

We used the Registro Informatizado de Enfermedad TromboEmbólica database to compare rates of venous thromboembolism recurrence and bleeding events occurring during the anticoagulation course in factor V Leiden carriers, prothrombin mutation carriers, and noncarriers.

RESULTS

Between March 2001 and December 2015, 10,139 patients underwent thrombophilia testing. Of these, 1384 were factor V Leiden carriers, 1115 were prothrombin mutation carriers, and 7640 were noncarriers. During the anticoagulation course, 160 patients developed recurrent deep vein thrombosis and 94 patients developed pulmonary embolism (16 died); 154 patients had major bleeding (10 died), and 291 patients had nonmajor bleeding. On multivariable analysis, factor V Leiden carriers had a similar rate of venous thromboembolism recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-1.64), half the rate of major bleeding (adjusted HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.25-0.99) and a nonsignificantly lower rate of nonmajor bleeding (adjusted HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.43-1.01) than noncarriers. Prothrombin mutation carriers and noncarriers had a comparable rate of venous thromboembolism recurrence (adjusted HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.68-1.48), major bleeding (adjusted HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.42-1.34), and nonmajor bleeding events (adjusted HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.77-1.57).

CONCLUSIONS

During the anticoagulation course, factor V Leiden carriers had a similar risk for venous thromboembolism recurrence and half the risk for major bleeding compared with noncarriers. This finding may contribute to decision-making regarding anticoagulation duration in selected factor V Leiden carriers with venous thromboembolism.

The Clinical Course of Venous Thromboembolism May Differ According to Cancer Site

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized that the clinical course of venous thromboembolism in patients with active cancer may differ according to the specificities of primary tumor site.

AIM AND METHODS

We used data from RIETE (international registry of patients with venous thromboembolism) to compare the clinical venous thromboembolism-related outcomes during the course of anticoagulation in patients with one of the 4 more frequent cancers (breast, prostate, colorectal, or lung cancer).

RESULTS

As of September 2014, 3947 cancer patients were recruited, of whom 938 had breast, 629 prostate, 1189 colorectal, and 1191 lung cancer. Overall, 55% had metastatic disease (42%, 36%, 53%, and 72%, respectively). During the course of anticoagulant therapy (mean duration, 139 days), the rate of thromboembolic recurrences was similar to the rate of major bleeding in patients with breast (5.6 [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.8-8.1] vs 4.1 [95% CI, 2.7-5.9] events per 100 patient-years) or colorectal cancer (10 [95% CI, 7.6-13] vs 12 [95% CI, 9.4-15] per 100 patient-years). In contrast, in patients with prostate cancer, the rate of venous thromboembolic recurrences was half the rate of major bleeding (6.9 [95% CI, 4.4-10] vs 13 [95% CI, 9.2-17] events per 100 patient-years), whereas in those with lung cancer, the rate of thromboembolic recurrences was twofold higher than the rate of major bleeding (27 [95% CI, 22-23] vs 11 [95% CI, 8.6-15] per 100 patient-years).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant differences in the clinical profile of venous thromboembolic-related outcomes were observed according to the site of cancer. These findings suggest the development of cancer-specific anticoagulant strategies as an area for further research.

Factors influencing adherence to clinical guidelines in the management of cancer-associated thrombosis

International academic and regulatory guidelines consistently recommend the long-term use of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) as the standard for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). However, both physicians and patients are reluctant to follow established guidelines. Insufficient compliance with treatment recommendations among care physicians represents a loss of opportunity for patients at very high risk of recurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and death. Few data are available regarding adherence to CAT clinical practice guidelines. Based on published data, we aimed to review the gap between guidelines and practice to draw a more precise picture of current practice in order to precisely identify the extent to which patient management is currently lacking with respect to treatment guidelines. Published observational studies, registries and surveys on cancer-associated VTE treatment were reviewed. In spite of evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showing the usefulness of long-term LMWH, only approximately 50% of patients are managed according to established guideline recommendations. Patient profiles and co-morbidities influence compliance with standard guidelines. A better knowledge of physician and patient-related factors that influence therapeutic decisions may improve the implementation of clinical practice guidelines. Efficient awareness programs including a multidisciplinary approach are necessary to implement guidelines aimed at optimizing the therapeutic management of cancer-associated VTE.

Renal function and venous thromboembolic diseases

Anticoagulant agents have been approved by international regulatory agencies to prevent and treat venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, chronic kidney disease (CKD) is: (1) highly frequent in VTE patients; (2) strongly linked to VTE; and (3) a risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity/mortality and fatal pulmonary embolism. Therefore, an increasing number of patients are presented with CKD and VTE and more and more physicians must face the questions of the management of these patients and that of the handling of anticoagulant agents in CKD patients because of the pharmacokinetic modifications of these drugs in this population. These modifications may lead to overdosage and dose-related side effects, such as bleeding. It is therefore necessary to screen VTE patients for CKD and to modify the doses of anticoagulants, if necessary.

PO-23 - Expression of heparanase in cancer as biomarker of malignancies: overexpression in an aggressive, poor survival gastric cancer "gastric signet ring cell carcinoma" compared with that of other gastric cancers

INTRODUCTION

Gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (GSRC) is a distinct entity among of other gastric cancer. With unknown etiopathology, their incidence is increasing and it presents a low sensitivity to chemotherapy.

AIM

Here, we studied the expression of the heparanase (HPA) in cancer tissues from GSRC patients and several cancer cell lines. HPA is an endo-β-D-glucuronidase, capable of cleaving the lateral chains of heparan sulfate on cell surfaces and the extracellular matrix at acidic pH. Apart from its well-characterized enzyme activity, HPA also has independent enzymatic functions, such as up-regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) -A and VEGF-C and activation of intracellular signaling pathways involved in, survival, migration and proliferation of tumor cells. It can also induce an hypercoagulability by a non-enzymatic manner.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

HPA was tested in several cancer cell lines from ovaries (OVCAR-3, SKOV-3), breast (MDAMB231, MCF7) colon (LS-174), lung (A549), uterus (HELA) and gastric (adenocarcinoma (AGS) and GSRC (KATO-III) using several techniques such as RT-PCR, Q-PCR, immunocytochemistry, flow cytometry and degradation of Fondaparinux at pH 5, evaluated by its anti Xa activity evaluated by Factor Xa amidolytic activity. The amount of HPA mRNA in the biopsy simples of gastric adenocarcinoma (n=10) and GSRC (n=11) in tumors and their environment were analyzed.

RESULTS

HPA gene is expressed in all cancer cell lines, but its level varies depending on the tumor cell line. In biopsies of gastric cancer, the HPA gene is more expressed in the tumor regions (p=0.0002) and tumor environment (p=0.015) in GSRC than in gastric adenocarcinoma. B) The activity of HPA, evaluated by degradation of Fondaparinux at pH 5, 1) in the supernatants of 10(6) cancer cells: the residual activity of Fondaparinux after 2 hours incubation at 37°C with OVCAR-3 supernatant was of 70% of control value, and of 80% with KATO-III cell supernatants. 2) in patient's plasmas, this technique cannot be used because the site of degradation of fondaparinux by heparanase is masked by AT present in plasma.

CONCLUSIONS

Heparanase was found in in many cancer cell lines and its level depends on origin of tumor cells and on its aggressivity. Taking into account the pro-metastatic functions, proangiogenic and procoagulant activity of HPA and its overexpression in gastric signet ring cell carcinoma of poor prognosis and its cell line, HPA can be considered as a biomarker of malignancy and as a therapeutic target in GSRC patients.

ADAMTS-13 and von Willebrand factor predict venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer

ESSENTIALS: Cancer patients are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). In this study, cases and controls were cancer patients who did or did not develop VTE. von Willebrand factor (VWF) levels were higher if compared with controls and correlated with cancer stage. VWF and ADAMTS-13 are associated with the occurrence of VTE in cancer.

BACKGROUND

Patients with cancer are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). ADAMTS-13 regulates von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity, which plays a role in the development of cancer and in VTE.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to search for an association between the levels of VWF and ADAMTS-13 and VTE in patients with cancer and to compare current scoring systems for prediction of VTE before and after addition of these parameters.

PATIENTS/METHODS

In a case-control study, in which patients with recently diagnosed cancer were followed-up for 6 months, we compared 20 patients who developed VTE (cases) and 140 patients with cancer without VTE (controls), matched for sex, age, and type and stage of cancer. We measured VWF, ADAMTS-13 (activity and antigen), P-selectin, D-dimer and F1 + 2 levels at baseline, and calculated both the Khorana score and the Khorana score expanded after addition of P-selectin and D-dimer levels.

RESULTS

VWF levels were significantly higher in cases when compared with controls (326 ± 185% vs. 242 ± 158%) and correlated with advanced stage of cancer: localized, 185 [142; 222]; locally advanced, 240 [146; 257]; metastatic, 267 [153; 324] (mean [interquartile range]). The addition of two biomarkers, ADAMTS-13 activity and F1 + 2 levels, to the Khorana score improved receiver operating curves.

CONCLUSIONS

von Willebrand factor and ADAMTS-13 are associated with the occurrence of VTE in patients with cancer. Moreover, addition of ADAMTS-13 and F1 + 2 levels to the Khorana score considerably increases the predictive value for VTE.

[Prevention of venous thromboembolic events by fondaparinux 2.5 mg in general practice. ArchiMed Ville]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the mean duration of treatment course with fondaparinux 2.5 mg (ARIXTRA(®)) in the setting of ambulatory general medicine, with respect to its indication in thromboprophylaxis for medically ill patients and to describe the population treated.

METHODS

Observational, prospective, national, multicenter, pharmaco-epidemiological study, performed in France, at the request of the Transparency Commission (a division of the French Health Regulatory Authority). The general practitioners had to include the first three adult patients, considered as patients at high risk of venous thromboembolic events and immobilized for acute medical illness, treated with initiation of thromboprophylaxis by fondaparinux 2.5 mg.

RESULTS

Two hundred and seventeen general practitioners included 840 patients. The mean age of patients was 63.6±18.1 years, and 63% of patients (n=520/831) were females. The real total administration duration of the treatment by fondaparinux 2.5 mg was known for 797 patients and was 15.8±12.4 days on average (range: 1-90 days, median: 10 days). In 40% of patients, the duration ranged from 6 to 14 days [duration consistent with the summary of product characteristics (SmPC)]. Among the 834 patients analyzed, 569 (68%) suffered from at least one acute illness and had at least one risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). The indication did fully comply with the summary of product characteristics of fondaparinux 2.5 mg in 52% of the patients (n=434/834 patients).

CONCLUSION

The results of the ArchiMed study support that the thromboprophylaxis treatment with fondaparinux 2.5 mg in ambulatory general medicine, and the associated medical conditions were usually consistent with the SmPC or guidelines. However, a difference was found for the duration and the initial indication, in situations that may be regarded as presenting a risk by the prescriber.

[Reactivation of parvovirus B19 infection in an HIV-infected woman]

INTRODUCTION

Infection by human parvovirus B19 (erythrovirus B19) is common and usually asymptomatic during childhood conferring lasting protection against a new infection. Parvovirus B19 infection may cause erythema infectiosum (5th disease) and aplastic crisis. Secondary symptomatic parvovirus B19 infection in the same patient is rare and its physiopathology is not always clear.

CASE REPORT

A 48-year-old HIV-infected female patient presented within 5 years two acute episodes of parvovirus B19 infection although her CD4 cells count was above 500/mm(3). Absence of specific antibodies production after the first episode and persisting parvovirus viremia suggested viral reactivation rather than re-infection. During the second episode, specific antibodies were produced.

CONCLUSION

Similarly to most DNA viruses, parvovirus B19 reactivation is possible in HIV-infected patients while effectively treated by antiretroviral therapy.

Predicting the warfarin maintenance dose in elderly inpatients at treatment initiation: accuracy of dosing algorithms incorporating or not VKORC1/CYP2C9 genotypes

BACKGROUND

Initiating warfarin is challenging in frail elderly patients because of low-dose requirements and interindividual variability.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated whether incorporating VKORC1 and CYP2C9 genotype information in different models helped to predict the warfarin maintenance dose when added to clinical data and INR values at baseline (Day 0), and during warfarin induction.

PATIENTS

We prospectively enrolled 187 elderly inpatients (mean age, 85.6 years), all starting on warfarin using the same 'geriatric dosing-algorithm' based on the INR value measured on the day after three 4-mg warfarin doses (INR(3)) and on INR(6 ± 1).

RESULTS

On Day 0, the clinical model failed to accurately predict the maintenance dose (R(2) < 0.10). Adding the VKORC1 and CYP2C9 genotypes to the model increased R(2) to 0.31. On Day 3, the INR(3) value was the strongest predictor, completely embedding the VKORC1 genotype, whereas the CYP2C9 genotype remained a significant predictor (model- R(2) 0.55). On Day 6 ± 1, none of the genotypes predicted the maintenance dose. Finally, the simple 'geriatric dosing-algorithm' was the most accurate algorithm on Day 3 (R(2) 0.77) and Day 6 (R(2) 0.81), under-estimating (≥ 1 mg) and over-estimating the dose (≥ 1 mg) in fewer than 10% and 2% of patients, respectively. Clinical models and the 'geriatric dosing-algorithm' were validated on an independent sample.

CONCLUSIONS

Before starting warfarin therapy, the VKORC1 genotype is the best predictor of the maintenance dose. Once treatment is started using induction doses tailored for elderly patients, the contribution of VKORC1 and CYP2C9 genotypes in dose refinement is negligible compared with two INR values measured during the first week of treatment.