Influence of primary cancer site on clinical outcomes of anticoagulation for associated venous thromboembolism

Derivation and validation of the Caravaggio score for the risk stratification for recurrence in patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

In patients with cancer associated venous thromboembolism (CAT), risk factor-based scores for recurrence could drive clinical management. The aim of this study in patients with CAT was to develop and validate a risk score for recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) during anticoagulation: the Caravaggio score.

METHODS

The Caravaggio score was developed in patients included in the Caravaggio trial and then externally validated in patients included in the TESEO registry. Potential predictors (univariate p-value ≤ 0.1) for recurrence were evaluated in a multivariable Cox regression model with death unrelated to VTE as competing event. Candidate predictors were identified and scored based on clinical relevance and β-coefficient. Patients were then categorized in three risk classes. The performance of the Caravaggio score was assessed by discrimination (c-statistics), sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (NPV).

RESULTS

Symptomatic VTE, ovarian and/or uterine cancer, pancreatic cancer, metastatic cancer, adenocarcinoma histological subtype, and pharmacological anticancer treatment were included in the score. In the derivation cohort, the incidence of recurrent VTE in the high, intermediate and low-risk groups was 11.6, 7.7 and 2.5 %, respectively. Incidences in the validation cohort were 8.0, 3.5 and 1.7 %, respectively. c-statistics in derivation and validation cohorts were 0.641 (95 % CI 0.584-0.698) and 0.606, (95 % CI 0.557-0.653), respectively. The NPV for low vs. intermediate/high-risk group was 98 % (95 % CI 95-99) in the derivation and 98 % (95 % CI 97-99) in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

The Caravaggio score is simple and able to stratify patients with CAT for the risk for VTE recurrence.

Safety and efficacy of anticoagulant treatment in patients with ovarian vein thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Background

The role of anticoagulation in ovarian vein thrombosis (OVT) is uncertain.

Objectives

We aimed to evaluate safety and efficacy of anticoagulant treatment in OVT patients.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases up to April 2024. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and observational studies enrolling at least 10 adult patients with objectively diagnosed OVT and treated with any anticoagulants. The protocol was prospectively registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42021270883).

Results

We included 17 observational studies (621 anticoagulated and 376 nonanticoagulated OVT patients); 9 studies enrolled mainly pregnancy/puerperium-related OVT. Most patients received heparins alone (45.7%) or proceeded to vitamin K antagonists (39.2%). The average treatment duration was ≤3 months in 8 studies (47.1%), >3 to ≤6 months in 6 studies (35.3%), and >6 months in 3 studies (17.6%). In treated patients, mortality rate was 2.43% (95% CI, 0.54%-5.41%; I2 = 53.8%; 12/406 patients; 13 studies), major bleeding was 1.27% (95% CI, 0.48%-2.38%; I2 = 2.5%; 7/583 patients; 15 studies), recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) was 3.49% (95% CI, 1.12%-6.95%; I2 = 63.5%; 22/482 patients; 15 studies), and vessel recanalization was 89.4% (95% CI, 74.6%-98.6%; I2 = 80.6%; 163/184 patients; 8 studies). The rate of recurrent VTE in untreated patients was 8.65% (95% CI, 2.61%-17.35%); however, the difference compared with treated patients was not statistically significant (risk ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.36-1.37). At subgroup analyses, the rates of major bleeding and recurrent VTE were 0.80% (95% CI, 0.0-2%.17%) and 3.81% (95% CI, 0.42%-9.63%) in pregnancy/puerperium-related OVT, respectively, and 1.12% (95% CI, 0.32%-2.34%) and 1.78% (95% CI, 0.62%-3.46%), respectively, when analyzing only full-text studies.

Conclusion

There is paucity of literature regarding OVT. Our results suggest that anticoagulation is associated with low rates of major bleeding and recurrent VTE.

Neuro-oncologic Emergencies

OBJECTIVE

Neuro-oncologic emergencies have become more frequent as cancer remains one of the leading causes of death in the United States, second only to heart disease. This article highlights key aspects of epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of acute neurologic complications in primary central nervous system malignancies and systemic cancer, following three thematic classifications: (1) complications that are anatomically or intrinsically tumor-related, (2) complications that are tumor-mediated, and (3) complications that are treatment-related.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

The main driver of mortality in patients with brain metastasis is systemic disease progression; however, intracranial hypertension, treatment-resistant seizures, and overall decline due to increased intracranial burden of disease are the main factors underlying neurologic-related deaths. Advances in the understanding of tumor-specific characteristics can better inform risk stratification of neurologic complications. Following standardized grading and management algorithms for neurotoxic syndromes related to newer immunologic therapies is paramount to achieving favorable outcomes.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

Neuro-oncologic emergencies span the boundaries of subspecialties in neurology and require a broad understanding of neuroimmunology, neuronal hyperexcitability, CSF flow dynamics, intracranial compliance, and neuroanatomy.

Extending venous thromboembolism secondary prevention with apixaban in cancer patients. The EVE trial

BACKGROUND

Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) management guideline recommendations include continued therapeutic anticoagulation while active cancer persists. The Federal Drug Administration label for apixaban for secondary VTE prevention includes a dose reduction to 2.5 mg twice daily after 6 months of treatment.

OBJECTIVES

The study's purpose was to determine whether this dose reduction is advisable for cancer-associated VTE.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind trial compared apixaban 2.5 mg with 5 mg twice daily for 12 months among cancer patients with VTE who had completed 6 to 12 months of anticoagulation therapy. The primary outcome was combined major bleeding plus clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding.

RESULTS

Of 370 patients recruited, 360 were included in the intention-to-treat analyses. Major plus clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurred in 16 of 179 patients (8.9%) in the apixaban 2.5 mg group compared with 22 of 181 patients (12.2%) in the 5 mg group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; 95% CI, 0.38-1.37; P = .39). Major bleeding occurred in 2.8% of the apixaban 2.5 mg group and in 2.2% of the 5 mg group (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.34-4.66; P = .73). Recurrent VTE or arterial thrombosis occurred in 9 of 179 patients (5.0%) in the apixaban 2.5 mg group and 9 of 181 patients (5.0%) in the 5 mg group (HR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.40-2.53; P = 1.00). All-cause mortality rates were similar between groups, 13% vs 12% (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.63-2.04; P = .67).

CONCLUSION

For secondary prevention of cancer-associated VTE, apixaban 2.5 mg compared with 5 mg twice daily did not lower combined bleeding events (EVE trial NCT03080883).

Comparing Anticoagulation Strategies for Venous Thromboembolism Associated With Active Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Current guidelines recommend several direct oral anticoagulant agents (DOACs) equally for managing cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE).

Objectives

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of DOACs in patients with active cancer.

Methods

Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central in November 2022. Randomized controlled trials investigating anticoagulation strategies (vitamin K antagonists, parenteral anticoagulation [eg, low-molecular weight heparin], and DOACs) for VTE in patients with active cancer were identified for network meta-analysis. The outcomes included recurrent VTE, recurrent pulmonary embolism, recurrent deep venous thrombosis, major bleeding, clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB), and a composite outcome of major bleeding or CRNMB. Pooled HRs and 95% CIs were estimated using either the HR or relative risk provided from each study. Random-effects models were used for all the analyses.

Results

Seventeen randomized controlled trials involving 6,623 patients with active cancer were included. No significant differences were found among the DOACs for efficacy outcomes (recurrent VTE, pulmonary embolism, and deep venous thrombosis). In terms of major bleeding, apixaban was similarly safe compared with dabigatran and rivaroxaban but was associated with a decreased risk compared with edoxaban (HR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.15-0.93). Regarding CRNMB, edoxaban was similarly safe compared with apixaban but was associated with a decreased risk compared with rivaroxaban (HR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.10-0.91). Compared with parenteral anticoagulation, apixaban was associated with a reduced risk for recurrent VTE (HR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.38-0.93) without increasing bleeding, edoxaban was associated with an increased risk for major bleeding or CRNMB (HR: 1.35; 95% CI: 1.02-1.79), and rivaroxaban was associated with an increased risk for CRNMB (HR: 3.76; 95% CI: 1.43-9.88).

Conclusions

DOACs demonstrate comparable efficacy but exhibit different safety profiles. Apixaban may confer an antithrombotic benefit without an increased risk for bleeding, distinguishing it from other contemporary anticoagulation strategies in patients with active cancer and VTE.

[Venous thromboembolism: risk factors and prophylaxis]

Venous thromboembolism is an important complication in tumour patients as it occurs frequently in these patients and causes relevant morbidity. The risk of thromboembolic complications in tumour patients is 3-9 times higher than in non-tumour patients and is the second most common cause of death in tumour patients. The risk of thrombosis depends on tumour-induced coagulopathy and on individual factors, type and stage of cancer, time since cancer diagnosis as well as type of systemic cancer therapy. Thromboprophylaxis in tumour patients is effective but can be associated with increased bleeding. Even though there are currently no dedicated recommendations for individual tumour entities, international guidelines recommend prophylactic measures in high-risk patients. A thrombosis risk of >8-10% can be considered an indication for thromboprophylaxis, which is indicated by a Khorana score ≥2, and should be calculated individually using nomograms. In particular, patients with a low risk of bleeding should receive thromboprophylaxis. Risk factors and symptoms of a thromboembolic event should also be intensively discussed with the patient and materials for patient information should be handed out.

No evidence for a genetic causal effect of breast cancer on venous thromboembolism: a mendelian randomization study

Active cancer is known to contribute to venous thromboembolism (VTE), but the cause-and-effect association of breast cancer on VTE is not yet clear. In order to investigate the possible causal relationships, we used a Mendelian randomization analysis. Data for generically predicted breast cancer were identified based on the BCAC consortium. A meta-analysis of genome-wide association study (GWAS) comprising 1,500,861 participants for VTE as well as data from the FinnGen study for VTE, DVT and PE was used for the causal-effect estimation. Our primary method was inverse-variance weighted (IVW), and our supplementary methods included weighted median and MR-Egger. We also carried out sensitivity analysis for the study. No evidence of causal-effect was detected of overall breast cancer on VTE in both the GWAS meta-analysis (OR=1.01, 95%CI:0.98-1.04, p = 0.495) and the FinnGen consortium (OR=1.00,95%CI:0.96-1.04, p = 0.945). In addition, the presence of ER-positive or ER-negative disease did not significantly influence the incidence of VTE and its subtypes. In conclusion, no genetic cause-and-effect of breast cancer on VTE risk was detected in the large MR analysis.

Cancer-Associated Abdominal Vein Thrombosis

Cancer is associated with an increased risk of developing venous thromboembolism, due to its direct influence on the three pillars of Virchow's triad (e.g., compression on the blood vessels by the tumour, blood vessels invasion, and cytokine release), together with the effect of exogenous factors (such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery). In cancer patients, the risk of thrombosis at unusual sites, such as splanchnic, ovarian and renal vein thrombosis, is also increased. Abdominal vein thromboses are frequently incidental findings on abdominal imaging performed as part of the diagnostic/staging workup or the follow-up care of malignancies. There is little evidence on the management of unusual site venous thromboembolism in cancer patients since there are only a few specific recommendations; thus, the management follows the general principles of the treatment of cancer-associated deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. This narrative review summarises the latest evidence on cancer-associated abdominal vein thrombosis, i.e., thrombosis of the splanchnic, ovarian and renal veins.