Comparative studies on the effects of sodium phenobarbital and two other constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) activators on induction of cytochrome P450 enzymes and replicative DNA synthesis in cultured hepatocytes from wild type and CAR knockout rats

Mode of action analysis for fluxapyroxad-induced rat liver tumour formation: evidence for activation of the constitutive androstane receptor and assessment of human relevance

The fungicide fluxapyroxad (BAS 700 F) has been shown to significantly increase the incidence of liver tumours in male Wistar rats at dietary levels of 1500 and 3000 ppm and in female rats at a dietary level of 3000 ppm via a non-genotoxic mechanism. In order to elucidate the mode of action (MOA) for fluxapyroxad-induced rat liver tumour formation a series of in vivo and in vitro investigative studies were undertaken. The treatment of male and female Wistar rats with diets containing 0 (control), 50, 250, 1500 and 3000 ppm fluxapyroxad for 1, 3, 7 and 14 days resulted in a dose-dependent increases in relative weight at 1500 and 3000 ppm from day 3 onwards in both sexes, with an increase in relative liver weight being also observed in male rats given 250 ppm fluxapyroxad for 14 days. Examination of liver sections revealed a centrilobular hepatocyte hypertrophy in some fluxapyroxad treated male and female rats. Hepatocyte replicative DNA synthesis (RDS) was significantly increased in male rats given 1500 and 3000 ppm fluxapyroxad for 3 and 7 days and in female rats given 50-3000 ppm fluxapyroxad for 7 days and 250-3000 ppm fluxapyroxad for 3 and 14 days; the maximal increases in RDS in both sexes being observed after 7 days treatment. The treatment of male and female Wistar rats with 250-3000 ppm fluxapyroxad for 14 days resulted in significant increases in hepatic microsomal total cytochrome P450 (CYP) content and CYP2B subfamily-dependent enzyme activities. Male Wistar rat hepatocytes were treated with control medium and medium containing 1-100 μM fluxapyroxad or 500 μM sodium phenobarbital (NaPB) for 4 days. Treatment with fluxapyroxad and NaPB increased CYP2B and CYP3A enzyme activities and mRNA levels but had little effect on markers of CYP1A and CYP4A subfamily enzymes and of the peroxisomal fatty acid β-oxidation cycle. Hepatocyte RDS was significantly increased by treatment with fluxapyroxad, NaPB and 25 ng/ml epidermal growth factor (EGF). The treatment of hepatocytes from two male human donors with 1-100 μM fluxapyroxad or 500 μM NaPB for 4 days resulted in some increases in CYP2B and CYP3A enzyme activities and CYP mRNA levels but had no effect on hepatocyte RDS, whereas treatment with EGF resulted in significant increase in RDS in both human hepatocyte preparations. Hepatocytes from male Sprague-Dawley wild type (WT) and constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) knockout (CAR KO) rats were treated with control medium and medium containing 1-16 μM fluxapyroxad or 500 μM NaPB for 4 days. While both fluxapyroxad and NaPB increased CYP2B enzyme activities and mRNA levels in WT hepatocytes, only minor effects were observed in CAR KO rat hepatocytes. Treatment with both fluxapyroxad and NaPB only increased RDS in WT and not in CAR KO rat hepatocytes, whereas treatment with EGF increased RDS in both WT and CAR KO rat hepatocytes. In conclusion, a series of in vivo and in vitro investigative studies have demonstrated that fluxapyroxad is a CAR activator in rat liver, with similar properties to the prototypical CAR activator phenobarbital. A robust MOA for fluxapyroxad-induced rat liver tumour formation has been established. Based on the lack of effect of fluxapyroxad on RDS in human hepatocytes, it is considered that the MOA for fluxapyroxad-induced liver tumour formation is qualitatively not plausible for humans.

The Function of Xenobiotic Receptors in Metabolic Diseases

Metabolic diseases are a series of metabolic disorders that include obesity, diabetes, insulin resistance, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. The increased prevalence of metabolic diseases has resulted in higher mortality and mobility rates over the past decades, and this has led to extensive research focusing on the underlying mechanisms. Xenobiotic receptors (XRs) are a series of xenobiotic-sensing nuclear receptors that regulate their downstream target genes expression, thus defending the body from xenobiotic and endotoxin attacks. XR activation is associated with the development of a number of metabolic diseases such as obesity, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases, thus suggesting an important role for XRs in modulating metabolic diseases. However, the regulatory mechanism of XRs in the context of metabolic disorders under different nutrient conditions is complex and remains controversial. This review summarizes the effects of XRs on different metabolic components (cholesterol, lipids, glucose, and bile acids) in different tissues during metabolic diseases. As chronic inflammation plays a critical role in the initiation and progression of metabolic diseases, we also discuss the impact of XRs on inflammation to comprehensively recognize the role of XRs in metabolic diseases. This will provide new ideas for treating metabolic diseases by targeting XRs. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This review outlines the current understanding of xenobiotic receptors on nutrient metabolism and inflammation during metabolic diseases. This work also highlights the gaps in this field, which can be used to direct the future investigations on metabolic diseases treatment by targeting xenobiotic receptors.

Induction by Phenobarbital of Phase I and II Xenobiotic-Metabolizing Enzymes in Bovine Liver: An Overall Catalytic and Immunochemical Characterization

In cattle, phenobarbital (PB) upregulates target drug-metabolizing enzyme (DME) mRNA levels. However, few data about PB's post-transcriptional effects are actually available. This work provides the first, and an almost complete, characterization of PB-dependent changes in DME catalytic activities in bovine liver using common probe substrates and confirmatory immunoblotting investigations. As expected, PB increased the total cytochrome P450 (CYP) content and the extent of metyrapone binding; moreover, an augmentation of protein amounts and related enzyme activities was observed for known PB targets such as CYP2B, 2C, and 3A, but also CYP2E1. However, contradictory results were obtained for CYP1A, while a decreased catalytic activity was observed for flavin-containing monooxygenases 1 and 3. The barbiturate had no effect on the chosen hydrolytic and conjugative DMEs. For the first time, we also measured the 26S proteasome activity, and the increase observed in PB-treated cattle would suggest this post-translational event might contribute to cattle DME regulation. Overall, this study increased the knowledge of cattle hepatic drug metabolism, and further confirmed the presence of species differences in DME expression and activity between cattle, humans, and rodents. This reinforced the need for an extensive characterization and understanding of comparative molecular mechanisms involved in expression, regulation, and function of DMEs.

Comparison of the Hepatic Effects of Phenobarbital in Chimeric Mice Containing Either Rat or Human Hepatocytes With Humanized Constitutive Androstane Receptor and Pregnane X Receptor Mice

Using a chimeric mouse humanized liver model, we provided evidence that human hepatocytes are refractory to the mitogenic effects of rodent constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) activators. To evaluate the functional reliability of this model, the present study examined mitogenic responses to phenobarbital (PB) in chimeric mice transplanted with rat hepatocytes, because rats are responsive to CAR activators. Treatment with 1000 ppm PB for 7 days significantly increased replicative DNA synthesis (RDS) in rat hepatocytes of the chimeric mice, demonstrating that the transplanted hepatocyte model is functionally reliable for cell proliferation analysis. Treatment of humanized CAR and pregnane X receptor (PXR) mice (hCAR/hPXR mice) with 1000 ppm PB for 7 days significantly increased hepatocyte RDS together with increases in several mitogenic genes. Global gene expression analysis was performed with liver samples from this and from previous studies focusing on PB-induced Wnt/β-catenin signaling and showed that altered genes in hCAR/hPXR mice clustered most closely with liver tumor samples from a diethylnitrosamine/PB initiation/promotion study than with wild-type mice. However, different gene clusters were observed for chimeric mice with human hepatocytes for Wnt/β-catenin signaling when compared with those of hCAR/hPXR mice, wild-type mice, and liver tumor samples. The results of this study demonstrate clear differences in the effects of PB on hepatocyte RDS and global gene expression between human hepatocytes of chimeric mice and hCAR/hPXR mice, suggesting that the chimeric mouse model is relevant to humans for studies on the hepatic effects of rodent CAR activators whereas the hCAR/hPXR mouse is not.

Critical evaluation of the human relevance of the mode of action for rodent liver tumor formation by activators of the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR)

Many nongenotoxic chemicals have been shown to produce liver tumors in mice and/or rats by a mode of action (MOA) involving activation of the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR). Studies with phenobarbital (PB) and other compounds have identified the key events for this MOA: CAR activation; increased hepatocellular proliferation; altered foci formation; and ultimately the development of adenomas/carcinomas. In terms of human relevance, the pivotal species difference is that CAR activators are mitogenic agents in mouse and rat hepatocytes, but they do not stimulate increased hepatocellular proliferation in humans. This conclusion is supported by substantial in vitro studies with cultured rodent and human hepatocytes and also by in vivo studies with chimeric mice with human hepatocytes. Examination of the literature reveals many similarities in the hepatic effects and species differences between activators of rodent CAR and the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα), with PPARα activators also not being mitogenic agents in human hepatocytes. Overall, a critical analysis of the available data demonstrates that the established MOA for rodent liver tumor formation by PB and other CAR activators is qualitatively not plausible for humans. This conclusion is supported by data from several human epidemiology studies.