1
|
Cheng X, Liu C, Yang Y, Liang L, Chen B, Yu H, Xia J, Liu S, Li Y. Advances in sulfur mustard-induced DNA adducts: Characterization and detection. Toxicol Lett 2021; 344:46-57. [PMID: 33705862 DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2021.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Revised: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Sulfur mustard (SM) is a blister chemical warfare agent with severe cytotoxicity and genotoxicity. It can extensively alkylate important macromolecules in organisms, such as proteins, DNA, and lipids, and produce a series of metabolites, among which the characteristic ones can be used as biomarkers. The exact toxicological mechanisms of SM remain unclear but mainly involve the DNA lesions induced by alkylation and oxidative stress caused by glutathione depletion. Various methods have been used to analyze DNA damage caused by SM. Among these methods, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) technology stands out and makes it possible to observe damage in view of biomarkers induced by SM. Sample preparation is critical for detection by LC-MS/MS and mainly includes DNA isolation, adduct hydrolysis, and adduct purification. Moreover, optimization of chromatographic conditions, selection of MS transitions, and quantitative strategies are also essential. SM-DNA adducts are generally considered to be N7-HETEG, O6-HETEG, N7-BisG, and N3-HETEA. This article proposes some other possibilities of SM-DNA adducts for the identification of SM genotoxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xi Cheng
- Department of Biology and Chemistry, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, 410073, PR China; State Key Laboratory of NBC Protection for Civilian, Beijing, 102205, PR China
| | - Changcai Liu
- State Key Laboratory of NBC Protection for Civilian, Beijing, 102205, PR China
| | - Yang Yang
- State Key Laboratory of NBC Protection for Civilian, Beijing, 102205, PR China
| | - Longhui Liang
- State Key Laboratory of NBC Protection for Civilian, Beijing, 102205, PR China
| | - Bo Chen
- State Key Laboratory of NBC Protection for Civilian, Beijing, 102205, PR China
| | - Huilan Yu
- State Key Laboratory of NBC Protection for Civilian, Beijing, 102205, PR China
| | - Junmei Xia
- State Key Laboratory of NBC Protection for Civilian, Beijing, 102205, PR China
| | - Shilei Liu
- State Key Laboratory of NBC Protection for Civilian, Beijing, 102205, PR China.
| | - Yihe Li
- Department of Biology and Chemistry, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, 410073, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Next-generation sequencing approaches for the study of genome and epigenome toxicity induced by sulfur mustard. Arch Toxicol 2018; 92:3443-3457. [PMID: 30155719 DOI: 10.1007/s00204-018-2294-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2018] [Accepted: 08/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Sulfur mustard (SM) is an extensive nucleophilic and alkylating agent that targets different tissues. The genotoxic property of SM is the most threatening effect, because it is associated with detrimental inflammations and susceptibility to several kinds of cancer. Moreover, SM causes a wide variety of adverse effects on DNA which result in accumulation of DNA adducts, multiple mutations, aneuploidies, and epigenetic aberrations in the genome. However, these adverse effects are still not known well, possibly because no valid biomarkers have been developed for detecting them. The advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has provided opportunities for the characterization of these alterations with a higher level of molecular detail and cost-effectivity. The present review introduces NGS approaches for the detection of SM-induced DNA adducts, mutations, chromosomal structural variation, and epigenetic aberrations, and also comparing and contrasting them with regard to which might be most advantageous.
Collapse
|