1
|
van der Zalm AP, Dings MPG, Manoukian P, Boersma H, Janssen R, Bailey P, Koster J, Zwijnenburg D, Volckmann R, Bootsma S, Waasdorp C, van Mourik M, Blangé D, van den Ende T, Oyarce CI, Derks S, Creemers A, Ebbing EA, Hooijer GK, Meijer SL, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Medema JP, van Laarhoven HWM, Bijlsma MF. The pluripotency factor NANOG contributes to mesenchymal plasticity and is predictive for outcome in esophageal adenocarcinoma. COMMUNICATIONS MEDICINE 2024; 4:89. [PMID: 38760583 PMCID: PMC11101480 DOI: 10.1038/s43856-024-00512-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the advent of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), overall survival rates of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) remain low. A readily induced mesenchymal transition of EAC cells contributes to resistance to CRT. METHODS In this study, we aimed to chart the heterogeneity in cell state transition after CRT and to identify its underpinnings. A panel of 12 esophageal cultures were treated with CRT and ranked by their relative epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity. RNA-sequencing was performed on 100 pre-treatment biopsies. After RNA-sequencing, Ridge regression analysis was applied to correlate gene expression to ranked plasticity, and models were developed to predict mesenchymal transitions in patients. Plasticity score predictions of the three highest significant predictive models were projected on the pre-treatment biopsies and related to clinical outcome data. Motif enrichment analysis of the genes associated with all three models was performed. RESULTS This study reveals NANOG as the key associated transcription factor predicting mesenchymal plasticity in EAC. Expression of NANOG in pre-treatment biopsies is highly associated with poor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation, the occurrence of recurrences, and median overall survival difference in EAC patients (>48 months). Perturbation of NANOG reduces plasticity and resensitizes cell lines, organoid cultures, and patient-derived in vivo grafts. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, NANOG is a key transcription factor in mesenchymal plasticity in EAC and a promising predictive marker for outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amber P van der Zalm
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mark P G Dings
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Paul Manoukian
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Hannah Boersma
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Reimer Janssen
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Bailey
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Jan Koster
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Danny Zwijnenburg
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Richard Volckmann
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sanne Bootsma
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Cynthia Waasdorp
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Monique van Mourik
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dionne Blangé
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Tom van den Ende
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - César I Oyarce
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sarah Derks
- Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Aafke Creemers
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eva A Ebbing
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerrit K Hooijer
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Pathology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sybren L Meijer
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Pathology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mark I van Berge Henegouwen
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jan Paul Medema
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten F Bijlsma
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
- Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang L, Geng H, Liu Y, Liu L, Chen Y, Wu F, Liu Z, Ling S, Wang Y, Zhou L. Hot and cold tumors: Immunological features and the therapeutic strategies. MedComm (Beijing) 2023; 4:e343. [PMID: 37638340 PMCID: PMC10458686 DOI: 10.1002/mco2.343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Revised: 07/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The "hotness" or "coldness" of the tumors are determined by the information of the cancer cells themselves, tumor immune characteristics, tumor microenvironment, and signaling mechanisms, which are key factors affecting cancer patients' clinical efficacy. The switch mechanism of "hotness" and "coldness" and its corresponding pathological characteristics and treatment strategies are the frontier and hot spot of tumor treatment. How to distinguish the "hotness" or "coldness" effectively and clarify the causes, microenvironment state, and characteristics are very important for the tumor response and efficacy treatments. Starting from the concept of hot and cold tumor, this review systematically summarized the molecular characteristics, influencing factors, and therapeutic strategies of "hot and cold tumors," and analyzed the immunophenotypes, the tumor microenvironment, the signaling pathways, and the molecular markers that contribute to "hot and cold tumors" in details. Different therapeutic strategies for "cold and hot tumors" based on clinical efficacy were analyzed with drug targets and proteins for "cold and hot tumors." Furthermore, this review combines the therapeutic strategies of different "hot and cold tumors" with traditional medicine and modern medicine, to provide a basis and guidance for clinical decision-making of cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lianjie Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer InstituteShuguang HospitalShanghai University of Traditional Chinese MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Hui Geng
- Department of Internal MedicineShanghai International Medical CenterShanghaiChina
| | - Yujie Liu
- Department of NephrologyShuguang HospitalShanghai University of Traditional Chinese MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Lei Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer InstituteShuguang HospitalShanghai University of Traditional Chinese MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Yanhua Chen
- Department of the Tumor Research Center, Academy of Integrative MedicineShanghai University of Traditional Chinese MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Fanchen Wu
- Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer InstituteShuguang HospitalShanghai University of Traditional Chinese MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Zhiyi Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer InstituteShuguang HospitalShanghai University of Traditional Chinese MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Shiliang Ling
- Department of Medical OncologyNingbo Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhejiang ProvinceNingboChina
| | - Yan Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer InstituteShuguang HospitalShanghai University of Traditional Chinese MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Lihong Zhou
- Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer InstituteShuguang HospitalShanghai University of Traditional Chinese MedicineShanghaiChina
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Davern M, Donlon NE. The future of combination immunotherapy in oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1217132. [PMID: 37520544 PMCID: PMC10375285 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1217132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Davern
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Noel E. Donlon
- Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James’s Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St. James’s Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Davern M, Donlon NE, O'Connell F, Gaughan C, O'Donovan C, McGrath J, Sheppard AD, Hayes C, King R, Temperley H, MacLean M, Bulter C, Bhardwaj A, Moore J, Donohoe C, Ravi N, Conroy MJ, Reynolds JV, Lysaght J. Nutrient deprivation and hypoxia alter T cell immune checkpoint expression: potential impact for immunotherapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:5377-5395. [PMID: 36445478 PMCID: PMC10349772 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04440-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
AIM Use of immune checkpoint blockade to enhance T cell-mediated immunity within the hostile tumour microenvironment (TME) is an attractive approach in oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC). This study explored the effects of the hostile TME, including nutrient deprivation and hypoxia, on immune checkpoint (IC) expression and T cell phenotypes, and the potential use of nivolumab to enhance T cell function under such conditions. METHODS AND RESULTS ICs were upregulated on stromal immune cells within the tumour including PD-L2, CTLA-4 and TIGIT. OAC patient-derived PBMCs co-cultured with OE33 OAC cells upregulated LAG-3 and downregulated the co-stimulatory marker CD27 on T cells, highlighting the direct immunosuppressive effects of tumour cells on T cells. Hypoxia and nutrient deprivation altered the secretome of OAC patient-derived PBMCs, which induced upregulation of PD-L1 and PD-L2 on OE33 OAC cells thus enhancing an immune-resistant phenotype. Importantly, culturing OAC patient-derived PBMCs under dual hypoxia and glucose deprivation, reflective of the conditions within the hostile TME, upregulated an array of ICs on the surface of T cells including PD-1, CTLA-4, A2aR, PD-L1 and PD-L2 and decreased expression of IFN-γ by T cells. Addition of nivolumab under these hostile conditions decreased the production of pro-tumorigenic cytokine IL-10. CONCLUSION Collectively, these findings highlight the immunosuppressive crosstalk between tumour cells and T cells within the OAC TME. The ability of nivolumab to suppress pro-tumorigenic T cell phenotypes within the hostile TME supports a rationale for the use of immune checkpoint blockade to promote anti-tumour immunity in OAC. Study schematic: (A) IC expression profiles were assessed on CD45+ cells in peripheral whole blood and infiltrating tumour tissue from OAC patients in the treatment-naïve setting. (B) PBMCs were isolated from OAC patients and expanded ex vivo for 5 days using anti-CD3/28 + IL-2 T cell activation protocol and then co-cultured for 48 h with OE33 cells. T cell phenotypes were then assessed by flow cytometry. (C) PBMCs were isolated from OAC patients and expanded ex vivo for 5 days using anti-CD3/28 + IL-2 T cell activation protocol and then further cultured under conditions of nutrient deprivation or hypoxia for 48 h and T cell phenotypes were then assessed by flow cytometry. KEY FINDINGS (A) TIGIT, CTLA-4 and PD-L2 were upregulated on CD45+ immune cells and CTLA-4 expression on CD45+ cells correlated with a subsequent decreased response to neoadjuvant regimen. (B) Following a 48 h co-culture with OE33 cells, T cells upregulated LAG-3 and decreased CD27 co-stimulatory marker. (C) Nutrient deprivation and hypoxia upregulated a range of ICs on T cells and decreased IFN-γ production by T cells. Nivolumab decreased IL-10 production by T cells under nutrient deprivation-hypoxic conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Davern
- Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Group, Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College, St. James's Hospital Campus, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - Noel E Donlon
- Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Group, Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College, St. James's Hospital Campus, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - Fiona O'Connell
- Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Caoimhe Gaughan
- Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Group, Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College, St. James's Hospital Campus, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - Cillian O'Donovan
- Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Group, Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College, St. James's Hospital Campus, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - Jason McGrath
- Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Andrew D Sheppard
- Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Group, Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College, St. James's Hospital Campus, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - Conall Hayes
- Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ross King
- Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Hugo Temperley
- Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Michael MacLean
- Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Christine Bulter
- Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Anshul Bhardwaj
- Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jenny Moore
- Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Claire Donohoe
- Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Narayanasamy Ravi
- Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Melissa J Conroy
- Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Group, Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College, St. James's Hospital Campus, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - John V Reynolds
- Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Joanne Lysaght
- Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Group, Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College, St. James's Hospital Campus, Dublin 8, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
McNamee N, Nindra U, Shahnam A, Yoon R, Asghari R, Ng W, Karikios D, Wong M. Haematological and nutritional prognostic biomarkers for patients receiving CROSS or FLOT. J Gastrointest Oncol 2023; 14:494-503. [PMID: 37201072 PMCID: PMC10186526 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-22-886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel with radiotherapy (CROSS) and perioperative docetaxel, oxaliplatin, calcium folinate and fluorouracil (FLOT) are widely used for gastric (GC), gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) and oesophageal cancers (OC). Prognostic and predictive markers for response and survival outcomes are lacking. This study evaluates dynamic neutrophil-lymphocyte ratios (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratios (PLR), albumin and body mass index (BMI) as predictors of survival, response and toxicity. METHODS This multi-centre retrospective observational study across 5 Sydney hospitals included patients receiving CROSS or FLOT from 2015 to 2021. Haematological results and BMI were recorded at baseline and pre-operatively, and after adjuvant treatment for FLOT. Toxicities were also recorded. An NLR ≥2 and PLR ≥200 was used to stratify patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine predictors of overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), rates of pathological complete response (pCR) and toxicity. RESULTS One hundred sixty-eight patients were included (95 FLOT, 73 FLOT). A baseline NLR ≥2 was predictive for worse DFS (HR 2.78, 95% CI: 1.41-5.50, P<0.01) and OS (HR 2.90, 95% CI: 1.48-5.67, P<0.01). Sustained elevation in NLR was predictive for DFS (HR 1.54, 95% CI: 1.08-2.17, P=0.01) and OS (HR 1.65, 95% CI: 1.17-2.33, P<0.01). An NLR ≥2 correlated with worse pCR rates (16% for NLR ≥2, 48% for NLR <2, P=0.04). A baseline serum albumin <33 was predictive of worse DFS and OS with a HR of 6.17 (P=0.01) and 4.66 (P=0.01) respectively. Baseline PLR, BMI, and dynamic changes in these markers were not associated with DFS, OS or pCR rates. There was no association of the aforementioned variables with toxicity. CONCLUSIONS This demonstrates that a high inflammatory state represented by an NLR ≥2, both at baseline and sustained, is prognostic and predictive of response in patients receiving FLOT or CROSS. Baseline hypoalbuminaemia is predictive of poorer outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas McNamee
- Department of Medical Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Udit Nindra
- Department of Medical Oncology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Adel Shahnam
- Department of Medical Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Robert Yoon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ray Asghari
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Weng Ng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Deme Karikios
- Department of Medical Oncology, Nepean Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Mark Wong
- Department of Medical Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tímár J, Honn KV, Hendrix MJC, Marko-Varga G, Jalkanen S. Newly identified form of phenotypic plasticity of cancer: immunogenic mimicry. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2023; 42:323-334. [PMID: 36754910 PMCID: PMC10014767 DOI: 10.1007/s10555-023-10087-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
Cancer plasticity is now a recognized new hallmark of cancer which is due to disturbances of cell differentiation programs. It is manifested not only in various forms like the best-known epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) but also in vasculogenic and megakaryocytic mimicries regulated by EMT-specific or less-specific transcription factors such as HIF1a or STAT1/2. Studies in the past decades provided ample data that cancer plasticity can be manifested also in the expression of a vast array of immune cell genes; best-known examples are PDL1/CD274, CD47, or IDO, and we termed it immunogenic mimicry (IGM). However, unlike other types of plasticities which are epigenetically regulated, expression of IGM genes are frequently due to gene amplifications. It is important that the majority of the IGM genes are regulated by interferons (IFNs) suggesting that their protein expressions are regulated by the immune microenvironment. Most of the IGM genes have been shown to be involved in immune escape of cancers broadening the repertoire of these mechanisms and offering novel targets for immunotherapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- József Tímár
- Department of Pathology, Forensic and Insurance Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
| | - Kenneth V Honn
- Departments of Pathology, Oncology and Chemistry, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.,Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Mary J C Hendrix
- Department of Biology, Shepherd University, Shepherdstown, WV, USA
| | - György Marko-Varga
- Clinical Protein Science and Imaging, Biomedical Centre, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sirpa Jalkanen
- Medicity Research Laboratories, Turku, Finland.,InFLAMES Flagship, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jantz-Naeem N, Böttcher-Loschinski R, Borucki K, Mitchell-Flack M, Böttcher M, Schraven B, Mougiakakos D, Kahlfuss S. TIGIT signaling and its influence on T cell metabolism and immune cell function in the tumor microenvironment. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1060112. [PMID: 36874131 PMCID: PMC9982004 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1060112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/19/2023] Open
Abstract
One of the key challenges for successful cancer therapy is the capacity of tumors to evade immune surveillance. Tumor immune evasion can be accomplished through the induction of T cell exhaustion via the activation of various immune checkpoint molecules. The most prominent examples of immune checkpoints are PD-1 and CTLA-4. Meanwhile, several other immune checkpoint molecules have since been identified. One of these is the T cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT), which was first described in 2009. Interestingly, many studies have established a synergistic reciprocity between TIGIT and PD-1. TIGIT has also been described to interfere with the energy metabolism of T cells and thereby affect adaptive anti-tumor immunity. In this context, recent studies have reported a link between TIGIT and the hypoxia-inducible factor 1-α (HIF1-α), a master transcription factor sensing hypoxia in several tissues including tumors that among others regulates the expression of metabolically relevant genes. Furthermore, distinct cancer types were shown to inhibit glucose uptake and effector function by inducing TIGIT expression in CD8+ T cells, resulting in an impaired anti-tumor immunity. In addition, TIGIT was associated with adenosine receptor signaling in T cells and the kynurenine pathway in tumor cells, both altering the tumor microenvironment and T cell-mediated immunity against tumors. Here, we review the most recent literature on the reciprocal interaction of TIGIT and T cell metabolism and specifically how TIGIT affects anti-tumor immunity. We believe understanding this interaction may pave the way for improved immunotherapy to treat cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nouria Jantz-Naeem
- Institute of Molecular and Clinical Immunology, Medical Faculty, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Romy Böttcher-Loschinski
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Magdeburg, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Katrin Borucki
- Institute of Clinical Chemistry, Department of Pathobiochemistry, Medical Faculty, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Marisa Mitchell-Flack
- Department of Oncology, The Bloomberg~Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Martin Böttcher
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Magdeburg, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
- Health Campus Immunology, Infectiology and Inflammation (GCI), Medical Faculty, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Burkhart Schraven
- Institute of Molecular and Clinical Immunology, Medical Faculty, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
- Health Campus Immunology, Infectiology and Inflammation (GCI), Medical Faculty, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Dimitrios Mougiakakos
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Magdeburg, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
- Health Campus Immunology, Infectiology and Inflammation (GCI), Medical Faculty, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Sascha Kahlfuss
- Institute of Molecular and Clinical Immunology, Medical Faculty, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
- Health Campus Immunology, Infectiology and Inflammation (GCI), Medical Faculty, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
- Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, Medical Faculty, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
- Center for Health and Medical Prevention (CHaMP), Otto-von-Guericke-University, Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhang S, You X, Xu T, Chen Q, Li H, Dou L, Sun Y, Xiong X, Meredith MA, Sun Y. PD-L1 induction via the MEK-JNK-AP1 axis by a neddylation inhibitor promotes cancer-associated immunosuppression. Cell Death Dis 2022; 13:844. [PMID: 36192389 PMCID: PMC9529958 DOI: 10.1038/s41419-022-05292-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Revised: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
MLN4924 is a first-in-class small molecule inhibitor of NEDD8-activating enzyme (NAE), which is currently in several clinical trials for anti-cancer applications. However, MLN4924 also showed some off-target effects with potential to promote the growth of cancer cells which counteracts its anticancer activity. In this study, we found that MLN4924 increases the levels of PD-L1 mRNA and protein in dose- and time-dependent manners. Mechanistic study showed that this MLN4924 effect is largely independent of neddylation inactivation, but is due to activation of both ERK and JNK signals, leading to AP-1 activation, which is blocked by the small molecule inhibitors of MEK and JNK, respectively. Biologically, MLN4924 attenuates T cell killing in a co-culture model due to PD-L1 upregulation, which can be, at least in part, abrogated by either MEK inhibitor or anti-PD-L1 antibody. In an in vivo BALB/c mouse xenograft tumor model, while MLN4924 alone had no effect, combination with either MEK inhibitor or anti-PD-L1 antibody enhanced the suppression of tumor growth. Taken together, our study provides a sound rationale for effective anticancer therapy in combination of anti-PD-L1 antibody or MEK inhibitor with MLN4924 to overcome the side-effect of immunosuppression by MLN4924 via PD-L1 induction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shizhen Zhang
- grid.412465.0Cancer Institute, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 310029 Hangzhou, China ,grid.412465.0Department of Breast Surgery and Oncology, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, Ministry of Education, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 310029 Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiahong You
- grid.13402.340000 0004 1759 700XInstitute of Translational Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 310029 Hangzhou, China
| | - Tiantian Xu
- grid.13402.340000 0004 1759 700XInstitute of Translational Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 310029 Hangzhou, China
| | - Qian Chen
- grid.13402.340000 0004 1759 700XInstitute of Translational Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 310029 Hangzhou, China
| | - Hua Li
- grid.214458.e0000000086837370Division of Radiation and Cancer Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, 4424B MS-1, 1301 Catherine Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
| | - Longyu Dou
- grid.13402.340000 0004 1759 700XInstitute of Translational Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 310029 Hangzhou, China
| | - Yilun Sun
- grid.214458.e0000000086837370Division of Radiation and Cancer Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, 4424B MS-1, 1301 Catherine Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
| | - Xiufang Xiong
- grid.412465.0Cancer Institute, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 310029 Hangzhou, China ,grid.13402.340000 0004 1759 700XInstitute of Translational Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 310029 Hangzhou, China
| | - Morgan A. Meredith
- grid.214458.e0000000086837370Division of Radiation and Cancer Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, 4424B MS-1, 1301 Catherine Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
| | - Yi Sun
- grid.412465.0Cancer Institute, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 310029 Hangzhou, China ,grid.13402.340000 0004 1759 700XInstitute of Translational Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 310029 Hangzhou, China ,grid.13402.340000 0004 1759 700XZhejiang University Cancer Center, 310029 Hangzhou, China ,grid.13402.340000 0004 1759 700XResearch Center for Life Science and Human Health, Binjiang Institute of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310053 Zhejiang China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Liu Z, Liu X, Shen H, Xu X, Zhao X, Fu R. Adenosinergic axis and immune checkpoint combination therapy in tumor: A new perspective for immunotherapy strategy. Front Immunol 2022; 13:978377. [PMID: 36159861 PMCID: PMC9493240 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.978377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
There are two figures and one table in this review, the review consists of 5823 words, without the description of figures and table, but including references. Tumor cells escape anti-tumor immune responses in various ways, including functionally shaping the microenvironment through the secretion of various chemokines and, cytokines. Adenosine is a powerful immunosuppressive metabolite, that is frequently elevated in the extracellular tumor microenvironment (TME). Thus, it has recently been proposed as a novel antitumor immunoassay for targeting adenosine- generating enzymes, such as CD39, CD73, and adenosine receptors. In recent years, the discovery of the immune checkpoints, such as programmed cell death 1(PD-1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), has also greatly changed treatment methods and ideas for malignant tumors. Malignant tumor immunotherapy has been developed from point-to-point therapy targeting immune checkpoints, combining different points of different pathways to create a therapy based on the macroscopic immune regulatory system network. This article reviews the theoretical basis of the adenosine energy axis and immune checkpoint combined therapy for malignant tumors and the latest advances in malignant tumors.
Collapse
|
10
|
FLOT and CROSS chemotherapy regimens alter the frequency of CD27+ and CD69+ T cells in oesophagogastric adenocarcinomas: implications for combination with immunotherapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2022:10.1007/s00432-022-04283-9. [DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04283-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
AbstractCombining immunostimulatory chemotherapies with immunotherapy is an attractive strategy to enhance treatment responses in oesophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma (OGJ). This study investigates the immunostimulatory properties of FLOT, CROSS and MAGIC chemotherapy regimens in the context of OGJ using in vitro and ex vivo models of the treatment-naïve and post-chemotherapy treated tumour microenvironment. FLOT and CROSS chemotherapy regimens increased surrogate markers of immunogenic cell death (HMGB1 and HLA-DR), whereas the MAGIC treatment regimen decreased HMGB1 and HLA-DR on OGJ cells (markedly for epirubicin). Tumour-infiltrating and circulating T cells had significantly lower CD27 expression and significantly higher CD69 expression post-FLOT and post-CROSS treatment. Similarly, the supernatant from FLOT- and CROSS-treated OGJ cell lines and from FLOT- and CROSS-treated OGJ biopsies cultured ex vivo also decreased CD27 and increased CD69 expression on T cells. Following 48 h treatment with post-FLOT and post-CROSS tumour conditioned media the frequency of CD69+ T cells in culture negatively correlated with the levels of soluble immunosuppressive pro-angiogenic factors in the conditioned media from ex vivo explants. Supernatant from FLOT- and CROSS-treated OGJ cell lines also increased the cytotoxic potential of healthy donor T cells ex vivo and enhanced OGJ patient-derived lymphocyte mediated-killing of OE33 cells ex vivo. Collectively, this data demonstrate that FLOT and CROSS chemotherapy regimens possess immunostimulatory properties, identifying these chemotherapy regimens as rational synergistic partners to test in combination with immunotherapy and determine if this combinatorial approach could boost anti-tumour immunity in OGJ patients and improve clinical outcomes.
Collapse
|
11
|
Davern M, Donlon NE, O' Connell F, Sheppard AD, Hayes C, King R, Temperley H, Butler C, Bhardwaj A, Moore J, Bracken-Clarke D, Donohoe C, Ravi N, Reynolds JV, Maher SG, Conroy MJ, Lysaght J. Cooperation between chemotherapy and immune checkpoint blockade to enhance anti-tumour T cell immunity in oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Transl Oncol 2022; 20:101406. [PMID: 35366537 PMCID: PMC8976141 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2022.101406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2022] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Response rates to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) remain low in oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC). Combining ICB with immunostimulatory chemotherapies to boost response rates is an attractive approach for converting 'cold' tumours into 'hot' tumours. This study profiled immune checkpoint (IC) expression on circulating and tumour-infiltrating T cells in OAC patients and correlated these findings with clinical characteristics. The effect of first-line chemotherapy regimens (FLOT and CROSS) on anti-tumour T cell immunity was assessed to help guide design of ICB and chemotherapy combinations in the first-line setting. The ability of ICB to enhance lymphocyte-mediated cytolysis of OAC cells in the absence and presence of post-FLOT and post-CROSS chemotherapy tumour cell secretome was assessed by a CCK-8 assay. Expression of ICs on T cells positively correlated with higher grade tumours and a subsequent poor response to neoadjuvant treatment. First-line chemotherapy regimens substantially altered IC expression profiles of T cells increasing PD-1, A2aR, KLRG-1, PD-L1, PD-L2 and CD160 and decreasing TIM-3 and LAG-3. In addition, pro-inflammatory T cell cytokine profiles were enhanced by first-line chemotherapy regimens. T cell activation status was significantly altered; both chemotherapy regimens upregulated co-stimulatory markers ICOS and CD69 yet downregulated co-stimulatory marker CD27. However, ICB attenuated chemotherapy-induced downregulation of CD27 on T cells and promoted differentiation of effector memory T cells into a terminally differentiated state. Importantly, dual nivolumab-ipilimumab treatment increased lymphocyte-mediated cytolysis of OAC cells, an effect further enhanced in the presence of post-FLOT tumour cell secretome. These findings justify a rationale to administer ICBs concurrently with first-line chemotherapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Davern
- Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Group, Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St. James's Hospital campus, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - Noel E Donlon
- Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Group, Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St. James's Hospital campus, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - Fiona O' Connell
- Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St. James's Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Andrew D Sheppard
- Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Group, Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St. James's Hospital campus, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - Conall Hayes
- Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St. James's Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ross King
- Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St. James's Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Hugo Temperley
- Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St. James's Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Christine Butler
- Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St. James's Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Anshul Bhardwaj
- Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St. James's Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jenny Moore
- Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St. James's Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Dara Bracken-Clarke
- Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Group, Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St. James's Hospital campus, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - Claire Donohoe
- Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St. James's Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Narayanasamy Ravi
- Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St. James's Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - John V Reynolds
- Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St. James's Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Stephen G Maher
- Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St. James's Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Melissa J Conroy
- Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Group, Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St. James's Hospital campus, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - Joanne Lysaght
- Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Group, Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St. James's Hospital campus, Dublin 8, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Davern M, Fitzgerald MC, Buckley CE, Heeran AB, Donlon NE, McGrath J, O' Connell F, Deshpande MR, Hayes C, MacDonald J, Sheppard AD, Reynolds JV, Maher SG, Lynam-Lennon N, Murphy B, Lysaght J. PD-1 and TIGIT blockade differentially affect tumour cell survival under hypoxia and glucose deprived conditions in oesophageal adenocarcinoma; implications for overcoming resistance to PD-1 blockade in hypoxic tumours. Transl Oncol 2022; 19:101381. [PMID: 35245832 PMCID: PMC8894275 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2022.101381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PD-1 and TIGIT expression are highly expressed on the surface of oesophageal epithelial cells during the early stages of metaplasia. Glucose deprivation and hypoxia upregulate PD-1 and TIGIT on the surface of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) cells in vitro. PD-1 and TIGIT blockade decrease Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL expression in OAC cells. PD-1 blockade in OAC cells enhances basal respiration and glycolytic reserve and upregulates GLUT1 on the surface of a subpopulation of OAC cells. PD-1 inhibition confers a survival advantage to OAC cells under glucose deprivation and hypoxia. TIGIT blockade decreases OAC cell proliferation and induces OAC cell death under normoxia, hypoxia and nutrient deprivation. TIGIT blockade increases ECAR yet decreases a range of metabolic parameters in OAC cells.
Recent studies have demontrated that immune checkpoint receptors are expressed on the surface of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) cells and might confer a survival advantage. This study explores the role of PD-1 and TIGIT signalling in OAC cells in either promoting or inhibiting the survival of OAC cells under characteristic features of the tumour microenvironment including nutrient-deprivation and hypoxia. PD-1 and TIGIT are expressed in normal and pre-malignant oesophageal epithelial cells and this expression significantly decreases along the normal- Barrett's Oesophagus- OAC disease sequence. However, glucose-deprivation and hypoxia significantly upregulated PD-1 and TIGIT on the surface of OAC cells in vitro. PD-1 blockade decreased OAC cell proliferation under normoxia but enhanced proliferation and decreased cell death in OAC cells under hypoxia and glucose-deprivation. TIGIT blockade decreased proliferation and induced OAC cell death, an effect that was maintained under nutrient-deprivation and hypoxia. Basal respiration and glycolytic reserve were enhanced and GLUT1 was upregulated on the surface of a subpopulation of OAC cells following PD-1 blockade. In contrast, TIGIT blockade enhanced a glycolytic phenotype in OAC cells, yet decreased other metabolic parameters including oxidative phosphorylation and basal respiration. Interestingly, inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation significantly upregulated TIGIT expression and inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation and glycolysis significantly decreased PD-1 on the surface of a subpopulation of OAC cells in vitro. These findings suggest an immune-independent mechanism for PD-1 inhibitor resistance in hypoxic tumours and suggest that TIGIT might be a more effective therapeutic target in OAC compared with PD-1 for treating hypoxic tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Davern
- Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Group, Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St. James's Hospital campus, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - Marie-Claire Fitzgerald
- Department of Physiology & Medical Physics, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, D02 YN77 Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Croí E Buckley
- Translational Radiobiology and Diagnostics Group, Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St. James's Hospital campus, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - Aisling B Heeran
- Translational Gastrointestinal Research Group, Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St. James's Hospital campus, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - Noel E Donlon
- Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Group, Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St. James's Hospital campus, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - Jason McGrath
- Cancer Chemoradiation Group, Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St. James's Hospital campus, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - Fiona O' Connell
- Translational Gastrointestinal Research Group, Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St. James's Hospital campus, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - Malvika R Deshpande
- Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Group, Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St. James's Hospital campus, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - Conall Hayes
- Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St. James's Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jamie MacDonald
- Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Group, Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St. James's Hospital campus, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - Andrew D Sheppard
- Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Group, Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St. James's Hospital campus, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - John V Reynolds
- Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St. James's Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Stephen G Maher
- Cancer Chemoradiation Group, Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St. James's Hospital campus, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - Niamh Lynam-Lennon
- Translational Radiobiology and Diagnostics Group, Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St. James's Hospital campus, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - Brona Murphy
- Department of Physiology & Medical Physics, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, D02 YN77 Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Joanne Lysaght
- Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Group, Department of Surgery, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St. James's Hospital campus, Dublin 8, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
PD-1 blockade enhances chemotherapy toxicity in oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Sci Rep 2022; 12:3259. [PMID: 35228614 PMCID: PMC8885636 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-07228-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Chemotherapy upregulates immune checkpoint (IC) expression on the surface of tumour cells and IC-intrinsic signalling confers a survival advantage against chemotherapy in several cancer-types including oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC). However, the signalling pathways mediating chemotherapy-induced IC upregulation and the mechanisms employed by ICs to protect OAC cells against chemotherapy remain unknown. Longitudinal profiling revealed that FLOT-induced IC upregulation on OE33 OAC cells was sustained for up to 3 weeks post-treatment, returning to baseline upon complete tumour cell recovery. Pro-survival MEK signalling mediated FLOT-induced upregulation of PD-L1, TIM-3, LAG-3 and A2aR on OAC cells promoting a more immune-resistant phenotype. Single agent PD-1, PD-L1 and A2aR blockade decreased OAC cell viability, proliferation and mediated apoptosis. Mechanistic insights demonstrated that blockade of the PD-1 axis decreased stem-like marker ALDH and expression of DNA repair genes. Importantly, combining single agent PD-1, PD-L1 and A2aR blockade with FLOT enhanced cytotoxicity in OAC cells. These findings reveal novel mechanistic insights into the immune-independent functions of IC-intrinsic signalling in OAC cells with important clinical implications for boosting the efficacy of the first-line FLOT chemotherapy regimen in OAC in combination with ICB, to not only boost anti-tumour immunity but also to suppress IC-mediated promotion of key hallmarks of cancer that drive tumour progression.
Collapse
|