Therapeutic plasma exchange in an intensive care unit (ICU): a 10-year, single-center experience

Adverse Events and Infectious Complications in the Critically Ill Treated by Plasma Exchange: A Five-Year Multicenter Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine, in critically ill patients treated with therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), the incidence of adverse events as well as the incidence of secondary infections and its predictive factors.

DESIGN

A multicenter retrospective cohort study of an intensive care population treated with TPE to collect adverse events and infectious complications. The characteristics of patients who developed an infection after plasma exchange were compared with those of patients who did not.

SETTING

Four ICUs of French university hospitals.

PATIENTS

All adults admitted between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019, who received at least one plasma exchange session were included.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 711 TPE sessions were performed on 124 patients. The most frequent TPE indications were thrombotic microangiopathies (n = 32, 26%), myasthenia gravis (n = 25, 20%), and acute polyradiculoneuropathy (n = 12, 10%). Among the 124 patients, 22 (21%) developed arterial hypotension, 12 (12%) fever, and 9 (9%) electrolyte disturbance during TPE. Moreover, 60 (48%) presented at least one infectious complication: ventilator-associated pneumonia 42, pneumonia 13, bacteremia 18 (of which 6 catheter-related infections) viral reactivation 14. Independent risk factors for ICU-acquired infection were the ICU length of stay (24 vs. 7 d; hazard ratio [HR]: 1.09 [1.04-1.15], p < 0.001) and invasive mechanical ventilation (92% vs. 35%; HR: 16.2 [5.0-53.0], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In critically ill patients treated with TPE, adverse events occurring during the procedure remain moderately frequent and are mostly not life-threatening. Infectious complications, mainly ventilation-associated pneumonia, are frequent in this population. The need of mechanical ventilation and longer ICU stay is associated with an increased risk of infection.

Indications and Outcomes of Patients Receiving Therapeutic Plasma Exchange under Critical Care Conditions: A Retrospective Eleven-Year Single-Center Study at a Tertiary Care Center

Background: Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is frequently performed in critical care settings for heterogenous indications. However, specific intensive care unit (ICU) data regarding TPE indications, patient characteristics and technical details are sparse. Methods: We performed a retrospective, single-center study using data from January 2010 until August 2021 for patients treated with TPE in an ICU setting at the University Hospital Zurich. Data collected included patient characteristics and outcomes, ICU-specific parameters, as well as apheresis-specific technical parameters and complications. Results: We identified n = 105 patients receiving n = 408 TPEs for n = 24 indications during the study period. The most common was thrombotic microangiopathies (TMA) (38%), transplant-associated complications (16.3%) and vasculitis (14%). One-third of indications (35.2%) could not be classified according to ASFA. Anaphylaxis was the most common TPE-related complication (6.7%), while bleeding complications were rare (1%). The median duration of ICU stay was 8 ± 14 days. Ventilator support, renal replacement therapy or vasopressors were required in 59 (56.2%), 26 (24.8%), and 35 (33.3%) patients, respectively, and 6 (5.7%) patients required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The overall hospital survival rate was 88.6%. Conclusion: Our study provides valuable real-world data on heterogenous TPE indications for patients in the ICU setting, potentially supporting decision-making.

Old plasma dilution reduces human biological age: a clinical study

This work extrapolates to humans the previous animal studies on blood heterochronicity and establishes a novel direct measurement of biological age. Our results support the hypothesis that, similar to mice, human aging is driven by age-imposed systemic molecular excess, the attenuation of which reverses biological age, defined in our work as a deregulation (noise) of 10 novel protein biomarkers. The results on biological age are strongly supported by the data, which demonstrates that rounds of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) promote a global shift to a younger systemic proteome, including youthfully restored pro-regenerative, anticancer, and apoptotic regulators and a youthful profile of myeloid/lymphoid markers in circulating cells, which have reduced cellular senescence and lower DNA damage. Mechanistically, the circulatory regulators of the JAK-STAT, MAPK, TGF-beta, NF-κB, and Toll-like receptor signaling pathways become more youthfully balanced through normalization of TLR4, which we define as a nodal point of this molecular rejuvenation. The significance of our findings is confirmed through big-data gene expression studies.

Therapeutic plasma exchange in the intensive care unit and with the critically ill, a focus on clinical nursing considerations

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is a blood purification technique removing antibodies and plasma proteins to modulate disease and promote recovery. The procedure has different methods, using a membrane or plasma separator with many elements similar to continuous renal replacement therapy (CCRT) in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). These nursing knowledge and skill sets apply where ICU nurses are providing TPE with increasing need. However, different care models are also in place where TPE is the responsibility of apheresis and nephrology teams visiting the ICU. The plasma replacement volume and prescribing is aligned with published guidelines but is variable when critical illness overlays the primary indication for TPE. There are some important considerations for TPE with respect to anticoagulation, machine settings, prescribing, and associated nursing management. TPE can be performed concurrent with CRRT in acute situations using Y‐piece and valve connectors and is a new and recent advanced blood purification for the ICU.

Membrane-based therapeutic plasma exchange in tertiary care ICU: demographic characteristics and predictors of complications

Introduction: Membrane-based therapeutic plasma exchange (mTPE) has been used to treat various diseases in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. However, there is a lack of clinical data regarding the practice of mTPE from Australian ICUs. Objectives: To determine factors contributing to complications in patients undergoing mTPE in the ICU. Methods: Prospectively collected data for mTPE procedures performed at the ICU of Flinders Medical Centre between April 2014 and December 2020 were analysed. Results: During the study period, 674 mTPE treatments were performed in 140 patients (71 females, 50.7%). Haematological disease (30.4%) was the most common indication for mTPE treatment. Citrate was the most common anticoagulation for mTPE (86.1%), while albumin (42.3%) was the most common replacement fluid. Circuit complications occurred in 18.6% of the total mTPE treatments. On logistical regression analysis, treatment ionised calcium level (odds ratio [OR], 42.2; 95% CI, 1.8-975.0; P = 0.02), male sex (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.04-4; P = 0.04), duration of mTPE treatment (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.02; P < 0.001) and diagnostic categories (P = 0.03) were predictors of circuit complications. During mTPE treatment, 87.2% of patients did not experience any complications. On logistical regression analysis, replacement fluid type (P = 0.03), lower initial blood flow (OR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.9-1.0; P = 0.04) and higher exchange volume (OR, 8.9; 95% CI, 1.6-48.7; P = 0.01) were predictors of patient complications. Conclusion: During mTPE, pre-treatment ionised calcium level, male sex, duration of mTPE and diagnostic categories were predictors of circuit complications, while replacement fluid type, initial blood flow and higher exchange volume were predictors of patient complications.

Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in the Critically Ill Patient: Technology and Indications

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is frequently the most common Apheresis Medicine technique used for extracorporeal therapy of a wide variety of renal, neurological, hematological, and other clinical indications. Many of these clinical indications require intensive care during critical illness. Conventional TPE uses one of two main technical methods to achieve the goal of removing known disease mediators from the plasma: using centrifugal forces to separate and remove components of blood, or a membrane filtration method that separates plasma from the cellular components of blood. The following review discusses the basic principles of TPE, the technological aspects, and relevant clinical scenarios encountered in the intensive care unit, including relevant guidelines and recommendations from the American Society for Apheresis.

Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Tehran Between 2011 and 2014

The goal of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is to remove autoantibodies, pathogenic molecules, immune complexes, toxins, high concentration lipoproteins, and pathological proteins. We aimed to present the most common indication of TPE and rate of admission to the intensive care unit. From 2011 to 2014, our retrospective study was conducted including 1069 inpatients from the Tehran Blood Transfusion Center, which was responsible for performing therapeutic apheresis in all 122 hospitals of Tehran. The patients, based on their TPE indication, were classified into five groups: hematological and oncological, neurological, renal, rheumatological diseases, and all the remaining diseases. We performed 6329 procedures of TPE on 1069 inpatients. Of the patients, 479 (44.8%) were male and 590 (55.2%) female. Their age varied from a minimum of 2 years to the maximum of 93 years. Overall, the mean of TPE sessions for each patient was 5.92 ± 3.9; 415 (38.8%) patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). ASFA categories I/II indications were considered an appropriate request for TPE, and 82.97% (887) of all TPE were suitable. The most frequent categories of TPE indications are as follows: neurological, hematological, and renal diseases. Class I/II indications in the neurological diseases, myasthenia gravis (21.7%), Guillain-Barré disease (21%), and multiple sclerosis (13.3%), were the most prevalent. In the hematological category, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) (14.1%) was observed to be greater than the other indications. We observed that the most prevalent illnesses are neurological (myasthenia gravis), hematological (TTP), and renal.

Effects of plasma exchange using different kinds of frozen plasma in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure

AIM: To compare the therapeutic efficacy of plasma exchange using fresh frozen plasma (FFP), frozen plasma (FP) or FFP + FP (1:1) in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure.

METHODS: One hundred and fourteen patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure hospitalized at our hospital from June 2013 to December 2013 were divided into three groups, including 38 cases who underwent plasma exchange with FFP, 38 cases with FP, and 38 cases with FFP + FP (1:1). Before plasma exchange, we compared the activation of coagulation factors and clotting function of FFP, FP and FFP + FP. Biochemical and clotting indicators before and after plasma exchange in the three groups of patients were tested and compared.

RESULTS: The activation levels of FⅡ:C (104.25% ± 5.43% vs 86.42% ± 8.76% vs 94.95% ± 7.52%) and FⅦ:C (88.26% ± 21.49% vs 89.59% ± 12.10% vs 88.63% ± 14.46%) in FFP, FP and their mixture showed no significantly differences (P > 0.05); however, the activation level of FⅤ:C (103.28% ± 25.32% vs 72.13% ± 21.49% vs 89.98% ± 22.33%), prothrombin time, activated partial prothrombin time, prothrombin activity, international normalized ratio, and the contents of Fig were significantly different (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in clotting and biochemical indicators after plasma exchange, the incidence of adverse reactions during the procedure, rebound percentage of some indicators after 7 d, or the mortality and improvement rates when discharged in the three groups.

CONCLUSION: FFP can be replaced by FP in plasma exchange when there is a shortage of FFP.

Therapeutic plasmapheresis in geriatric patients: favorable results

Therapeutic plasma exchange is generally a tolerable procedure, although several complications should be considered. Since geriatric population has been growing worldwide, the aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze 4709 TPE data from 981 geriatric procedures (20.8%) and to compare them with 3728 non-geriatric procedures (79.2%). The most common indications for TPE in both groups were sepsis/adult respiratory distress syndrome and multiple organ dysfunction. In geriatric patient group, contrary to expectations of aggravation, complication rate was statistically similar with non-geriatric group (P > 0.05). Therefore, TPE appeared to be a safe procedure in geriatric patients when performed by experienced practitioners.

Plasma exchange in the intensive care unit: a 10 year retrospective audit

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Plasma exchange (PE) is a therapeutic technique for the removal of illness-associated antibodies and toxins. Little is currently known about the prescription and technique for PE in the Intensive Care setting. In addition, different illnesses require specific PE regimens to optimise the clinical outcome for the patient. We sought to audit our use of PE for: number of treatments, clinical indications, treatments prescribed and administered, any procedural or patient complications, and adherence to current best practice recommendations.

METHOD

A retrospective audit involving all patients who were admitted to our tertiary 20 bed Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and received PE therapy between 1 January 2002 and 31 December 2011. Data was collected from identified patient medical records using a specifically designed case report form.

RESULTS

Thirty unique patients were identified in this audit. There was an incidence of 0.15% use of PE during this period. Eighteen female patients (60%) were indentified, median age 59.5 (48-70) years. These 30 patients were prescribed 135 PE treatments, requiring 156 membranes in total with a 15.5% incidence of premature circuit clotting. Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (TTP) was the most common indication for PE (37%) with 10 other clinical indications. Median length of ICU admission was 9.5 (3-17) days. The PE regimens received by patients in this ICU were not always prescribed in accordance with current best practice recommendations. No patient complications were identified with these PE treatments.

CONCLUSION

PE is a valuable treatment option for critically ill patients suffering antibody-mediated illness. The findings of this audit have identified differences between the current prescription recommendations for PE and those applied. TTP was the most common indication for PE, and no patient complications were identified, however a 15.5% incidence of circuit clotting occurred. The infrequency of the therapy and the different indications present a challenge for Intensive Care clinicians to provide best care in all cases. Improving the prescription of PE through the implementation of a new protocol and clinical education may result in better outcomes for our patients.

Therapeutic plasma exchange in patients with neurological diseases: multicenter retrospective analysis

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), is a procedure, changing pathologic substances in the plasma of patients with replacement fluid. TPE has an increasing list of indications in recent years such as neurological, connective tissue, hematological, nephrological, endocrinological and metabolic disorders. We report our multicenter data about therapeutic plasma exchange in patients with neurological diseases. Six University Hospitals' aphaeresis units medical records about neurologic diseases were reviewed retrospectively. Hundred and fifteen patients and 771 TPE sessions from six aphaeresis units' were included to this study. Of the 115 patients, 53 (46%) were men and 62 (54%) were women. The median age was 50 (range: 5-85) years. Of these patients 58.3% were Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS), 17.4% were acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), 10.4% were chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), 7% were multiple sclerosis, 6.1% were myasthenia gravis (MG) and 0.9% were Wilson disease (WD). The median number of TPE sessions per patient was 5 (range 1-72). Human albumin was used as a replacement fluid in 66% and fresh frozen plasma was used in 34% of cases. TPE was done through central venous catheters in 66%, and peripheral venous access in 34% of patients. Some complications were seen in patients (18.3%) during TPE sessions. These complications were, complications related to catheter placement procedure (8.7%), hypotension (3.5%), hypocalcaemia (3.5%) and allergic reactions (1.7%). The complication ratios were 2.7% in total 771 TPE procedures. TPE procedure was terminated in 6% of sessions depending on these complications. Overall responses to TPE were noted in 89.5% of patients. In conclusion; Therapeutic plasma exchange is an effective treatment option in several neurologic diseases.