Analyses of registry data of patients with anti-GBM and antineutrophil cytoplasmatic antibody-associated (ANCA) vasculitis treated with or without therapeutic apheresis

The world apheresis association registry, 2023 update

The WAA apheresis registry contains data on more than 140,000 apheresis procedures conducted in 12 different countries. The aim is to give an update of indications, type and number of procedures and adverse events (AEs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The WAA-registry is used for registration of apheresis procedures and is free of charge. The responsible person for a center can apply at the site www.waa-registry.org RESULTS: Data includes reported AEs from 2012 and various procedures and diagnoses during the years 2018-2022; the latter in total from 27 centers registered a total of 9500 patients (41% women) that began therapeutic apheresis (TA) during the period. A total of 58,355 apheresis procedures were performed. The mean age was 50 years (range 0-94). The most common apheresis procedure was stem cell collection for which multiple myeloma was the most frequent diagnosis (51%). Donor cell collection was done in 14% and plasma exchange (PEX) in 28% of patients; In relation to all performed procedures PEX, using a centrifuge (35%) and LDL-apheresis (20%) were the most common. The main indication for PEX was TTP (17%). Peripheral veins were used in 56% as the vascular access. The preferred anticoagulant was ACD. AEs occurred in 2.7% of all procedures and were mostly mild (1%) and moderate 1.5% (needed supportive medication) and, only rarely, severe (0.15%). CONCLUSION: The data showed a wide range of indications and variability in apheresis procedures with low AE frequency.

Systematic literature review informing the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV): part 1-treatment of granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis

OBJECTIVE

To summarise and update evidence to inform the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV).

METHODS

A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed to identify current evidence regarding treatment of AAV. PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane library were searched from 1 February 2015 to 25 February 2022. The evidence presented here is focused on the treatment of granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis.

RESULTS

3517 articles were screened and 175 assessed by full-text review. Ninety articles were included in the final evidence synthesis. Cyclophosphamide and rituximab (RTX) show similar efficacy for remission induction (level of evidence (LoE) 1a) but RTX is more effective in relapsing disease (LoE 1b). Glucocorticoid (GC) protocols with faster tapering result in similar remission rates but lower rates of serious infections (LoE 1b). Avacopan can be used to rapidly taper and replace GC (LoE 1b). Data on plasma exchange are inconsistent depending on the analysed trial populations but meta-analyses based on randomised controlled trials demonstrate a reduction of the risk of end-stage kidney disease at 1 year but not during long-term follow-up (LoE 1a). Use of RTX for maintenance of remission is associated with lower relapse rates compared with azathioprine (AZA, LoE 1b). Prolonged maintenance treatment results in lower relapse rates for both, AZA (LoE 1b) and RTX (LoE 1b).

CONCLUSION

This SLR provides current evidence to inform the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of AAV.

Risk Stratification to Predict Renal Survival in Anti-Glomerular Basement Membrane Disease

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

Most patients with anti-glomerular basement membrane (GBM) disease present with rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis, and more than half develop ESKD. Currently, no tools are available to aid in the prognostication or management of this rare disease. In one of the largest assembled cohorts of patients with anti-GBM disease (with 174 patients included in the final analysis), the authors demonstrated that the renal risk score for ANCA-associated vasculitis is transferable to anti-GBM disease and the renal histology is strongly predictive of renal survival and recovery. Stratifying patients according to the percentage of normal glomeruli in the kidney biopsy and the need for RRT at the time of diagnosis improves outcome prediction. Such stratification may assist in the management of anti-GBM disease.

BACKGROUND

Prospective randomized trials investigating treatments and outcomes in anti-glomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM) disease are sparse, and validated tools to aid prognostication or management are lacking.

METHODS

In a retrospective, multicenter, international cohort study, we investigated clinical and histologic parameters predicting kidney outcome and sought to identify patients who benefit from rescue immunosuppressive therapy. We also explored applying the concept of the renal risk score (RRS), currently used to predict renal outcomes in ANCA-associated vasculitis, to anti-GBM disease.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 174 patients (out of a total of 191). Using Cox and Kaplan-Meier methods, we found that the RRS was a strong predictor for ESKD. The 36-month renal survival was 100%, 62.4%, and 20.7% in the low-risk, moderate-risk, and high-risk groups, respectively. The need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) at diagnosis and the percentage of normal glomeruli in the biopsy were independent predictors of ESKD. The best predictor for renal recovery was the percentage of normal glomeruli, with a cut point of 10% normal glomeruli providing good stratification. A model with the predictors RRT and normal glomeruli ( N ) achieved superior discrimination for significant differences in renal survival. Dividing patients into four risk groups led to a 36-month renal survival of 96.4% (no RRT, N ≥10%), 74.0% (no RRT, N <10%), 42.3% (RRT, N ≥10%), and 14.1% (RRT, N <10%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate that the RRS concept is transferrable to anti-GBM disease. Stratifying patients according to the need for RRT at diagnosis and renal histology improves prediction, highlighting the importance of normal glomeruli. Such stratification may assist in the management of anti-GBM disease.

PODCAST

This article contains a podcast at https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/JASN/2023_02_27_JASN0000000000000060.mp3.

Endopeptidase Cleavage of Anti-Glomerular Basement Membrane Antibodies in vivo in Severe Kidney Disease: An Open-Label Phase 2a Study

BACKGROUND

The prognosis for kidney survival is poor in patients presenting with circulating anti-glomerular basement membrane (GBM) antibodies and severe kidney injury. It is unknown if treatment with an endopeptidase that cleaves circulating and kidney bound IgG can alter the prognosis.

METHODS

An investigator-driven phase 2a one-arm study (EudraCT 2016-004082-39) was performed in 17 hospitals in five European countries. A single dose of 0.25 mg/kg of imlifidase was given to 15 adults with circulating anti-GBM antibodies and an eGFR <15 ml/min per 1.73m². All patients received standard treatment with cyclophosphamide and corticosteroids, but plasma exchange only if autoantibodies rebounded. The primary outcomes were safety and dialysis independency at 6 months.

RESULTS

At inclusion, ten patients were dialysis dependent and the other five had eGFR levels between 7 and 14 ml/min per 1.73m². The median age was 61 years (range 19-77), six were women, and six were also positive for anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies. Then 6 hours after imlifidase infusion, all patients had anti-GBM antibodies levels below the reference range of a prespecified assay. At 6 months 67% (ten out of 15) were dialysis independent. This is significantly higher compared with 18% (nine out of 50) in a historical control cohort (P<0.001, Fisher's exact test). Eight serious adverse events (including one death) were reported, none assessed as probably or possibly related to the study drug.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pilot study, the use of imlifidase was associated with a better outcome compared with earlier publications, without major safety issues, but the findings need to be confirmed in a randomized controlled trial.Clinical Trial registration number: EUDRACT 2016-004082-39 https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2007-001377-28/results.