Cyclosporine lymphocyte level and lymphocyte count: new guidelines for tailoring immunosuppressive therapy

Association Between Blood and Lymphocyte Levels of Cyclosporin A and Infectious Complications in Renal Transplant Patients

Objectives

This study aims to investigate a potential association between whole blood and lymphocyte Cyclosporin A (CyA) levels and the occurrence and frequency of infectious complications in kidney transplant patients.

Methods

The study involves 130 kidney transplant recipients who received CyA in addition to Mycophenolate Mofetil and steroids. CyA whole blood trough and maximum level (CyA BL₀ and CyA BLm) as well as the corresponding levels in the lymphocytes (CyA L₀ and CyA Lm) were measured for 6 months post-transplantation.

Results

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) as well as urinary tract infections (UTIs) were the most commonly diagnosed with an incidence of 24.6% and 26.2%, respectively. Only CyA L₀ showed a significant association with CMV infection occurrence (adjusted OR = 1.051, 95% CI .997–1.025, P-value 0.046). A positive linear correlation was found between CyA BL₀, CyA BLm and CyA Lm and the number of CMV episodes per patient.

Conclusion

We showed an association between the CMV infections occurrence and the trough lymphocyte level of CyA (CyA L₀). Both lymphocyte CyA levels also correlated with the frequency of CMV infections. Further studies are needed to establish the optimal range of both CyA blood and lymphocyte levels and decrease the risk of opportunistic infections in high risk patients.

Intra-cellular immunosuppressive drugs monitoring: A step forward towards better therapeutic efficacy after organ transplantation?

Immunosuppressive drugs (IS) used in solid organ transplantation are critical dose drugs with high intra- and inter-subject variability. Therefore, IS therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), mainly as trough levels analysis, is a major support to patient management, mandatory to optimize clinical outcome. Even though transplant patients undoubtedly benefited by this pre-dose (C0) monitoring, the relationship between these C0 concentrations and the incidence of graft rejections remains hardly predictable. Identification and validation of additional biomarkers of efficacy are therefore very much needed. As the main IS effects are mediated through the inhibition of lymphocyte proliferation pathways, direct drug quantification within this target compartment would appear meaningful, providing hopefully more consistent information on drug efficacy. Due to the analytical performances improvement, these intracellular concentrations became accessible for comprehensive studies regarding clinical benefit of intracellular IS TDM after solid organ transplantation. Over the last ten years, number of studies investigated the potential relationship between IS blood and intracellular pharmacokinetics, genetic variability, and clinical efficacy after solid organ transplantation. A recent literature review suggests that calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus and cyclosporine) intracellular concentrations appear more closely related to drug efficacy than blood levels. This closer association has however not been described for the m-TOR inhibitors (sirolimus, everolimus) and the antimetabolite (mycophenolic acid). Additional larger and multicenter clinical trials are needed to confirm these observations.

Alternative matrices for therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressive agents using LC-MS/MS

Immunosuppressive drugs used in solid organ transplants typically have narrow therapeutic windows and high intra- and intersubject variability. To ensure satisfactory exposure, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) plays a pivotal role in any successful posttransplant maintenance therapy. Currently, recommendations for optimum immunosuppressant concentrations are based on blood/plasma measurements. However, they introduce many disadvantages, including poor prediction of allograft survival and toxicity, a weak correlation with drug concentrations at the site of action and the invasive nature of the sample collection. Thus, alternative matrices have been investigated. This paper reviews tandem-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods used for the quantification of immunosuppressant drugs utilizing nonconventional matrices, namely oral fluids, fingerprick blood and intracellular and intratissue sampling. The advantages, disadvantages and clinical application of such alternative mediums are discussed. Additionally, sample extraction techniques and basic chromatography information regarding these methods are presented in tabulated form.

Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for simultaneous determination of cyclosporine A and its three metabolites AM1, AM9 and AM4N in whole blood and isolated lymphocytes in renal transplant patients

A LC-MS/MS method was developed and validated for the determination of cyclosporine A (CsA) and its three phase 1 metabolites AM1, AM9, and AM4N in whole blood and lymphocytes isolated on the Histopaque gradient. 200 microL of whole blood was precipitated with 10 mol/L zinc sulfate in acetonitrile/methanol (40:60, v/v) and lymphocytes isolated from 1.5 mL blood were extracted with acetonitrile/methanol (40:60, v/v). The analytes and internal standard cyclosporine D were separated on RP column BEH C18, 2.1 x 50 mm, 1.7 microm using gradient LC-MS/MS analysis in positive electrospray mode. Time of analysis was 5 min. Linearity in blood was 5-2000 microg/L for CsA, AM1, and AM9; 2-500 microg/L for AM4N; and 2-500 microg/L for all substances in lymphocytes. Coefficient of variations was 1.8-9.8% and recovery was 92.0-110.0%. The method was used in early and chronic renal transplant patients for therapeutic drug monitoring of CsA to compare either its share in lymphocytes as target organ or binding to one lymphocyte. The same parameters were calculated for all metabolites tested.

New insights into the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the calcineurin inhibitors and mycophenolic acid: possible consequences for therapeutic drug monitoring in solid organ transplantation

Although therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of immunosuppressive drugs has been an integral part of routine clinical practice in solid organ transplantation for many years, ongoing research in the field of immunosuppressive drug metabolism, pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical TDM keeps yielding new insights that might have future clinical implications. In this review, the authors will highlight some of these new insights for the calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) cyclosporine and tacrolimus and the antimetabolite mycophenolic acid (MPA) and will discuss the possible consequences. For CNIs, important relevant lessons for TDM can be learned from the results of 2 recently published large CNI minimization trials. Furthermore, because acute rejection and drug-related adverse events do occur despite routine application of CNI TDM, alternative approaches to better predict the dose-concentration-response relationship in the individual patient are being explored. Monitoring of CNI concentrations in lymphocytes and other tissues, determination of CNI metabolites, and CNI pharmacogenetics and pharmacodynamics are in their infancy but have the potential to become useful additions to conventional CNI TDM. Although MPA is usually administered at a fixed dose, there is a rationale for MPA TDM, and this is substantiated by the increasing knowledge of the many nongenetic and genetic factors contributing to the interindividual and intraindividual variability in MPA pharmacokinetics. However, recent, large, randomized clinical trials investigating the clinical utility of MPA TDM have reported conflicting data. Therefore, alternative pharmacokinetic (ie, MPA free fraction and metabolites) and pharmacodynamic approaches to better predict drug efficacy and toxicity are being explored. Finally, for MPA and tacrolimus, novel formulations have become available. For MPA, the differences in pharmacokinetic behavior between the old and the novel formulation will have implications for TDM, whereas for tacrolimus, this probably will not to be the case.

An assay for the determination of sirolimus levels in the lymphocyte of transplant patients

Both tacrolimus (TAC) and sirolimus (SRL) bind to the same immunophilin FKBP12; however, their mechanisms of action are distinct. SRL inhibits mammalian target of rapamycin (TOR), which is an enzyme critical to the immune function. TOR inhibition blocks the signal that mediates T-cell proliferation by preventing cell-cycle progression from G1 to S phase. Moreover, TOR inhibition results in a decrease in antibody production by blocking B-cell proliferation and maturation into antibody producing cells. The use of SRL has resulted in a decrease in the number of rejection episodes. As with other immunosuppressive agents, SRL can cause dose-related side effects, the most notable of which are hypercholesterolemia, hyperlipidemia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. Thus, therapeutic drug monitoring to assess efficacy and toxicity has became a necessity. SRL blood levels do not correlate with its bioactivity and are affected by the concomitant use of other immunosuppressive drugs. To determine the bioactivity of SRL we have developed an assay to determine the level of Sirolimus per lymphocyte of transplant patients. The levels were correlated with lymphocyte count.

METHODS

Whole blood samples from patients on SRL were collected in Ethylene Diamine Tetra-acetic acid (EDTA) vacutainer tubes. Immediately the lymphocytes from 2 mL of blood were separated using 1.5 mL of Ficoll gradient, by centrifugation for 30 minutes at 2500 RPM. The lymphocytes were washed three times with phosphate-bufferd saline and the pellet suspended in 150 microL of Middle East research institute (MERI) drug extraction solution (Beirut, Lebanon), which was then added to 300 microL of IMx solublizing reagent. The cytoplasmic SRL concentrations in lymphocytes were measured using kits supplied from Abbott diagnostics or by high-performance liquid tomography. A corresponding whole blood sample from each patient was used to measure blood levels. To determine the level per lymphocyte, the value obtained was divided by the number of lymphocytes and expressed as Pg/cell. A pharmacokinetic profile for both blood and lymphocytes was constructed for each patient using data corresponding to predose C(0), 1 hour (C(1)) and 2 hours (C(2)) after the dose. The lymphocyte enumeration for C(0), C(1), and C(2) was performed using the FACS Calibur Flow Cytometer from Becton Dickinson. The average dose was 2.86 +/- 1.27 mg/d with a C(0) = 8.05 +/- 4.24, C(1) = 21.9 +/- 8.9 ng/mL, and C(2) = 23 +/- 0.03 ng/mL. Although there was a significant correlation (P=.0975) between the dose and C(0), there was no correlation between the dose and C(0) level on the lymphocyte count P=.897. However, there was a strong correlation between SRL lymphocyte levels (pg/cell) and the lymphocyte count (r(2)=.6.06). The higher the concentration of the drug the lower the lymphocyte counts. The assay is sensitive to within 0.45 pg/cell, reproducible with a coefficient of variance (CV) of 6.4% within assay and 7.5% for intraassay.

Validation of a Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometric Assay for Tacrolimus in Liver Biopsies After Hepatic Transplantation: Correlation With Histopathologic Staging of Rejection

The aims of this work were both to validate a sensitive and specific method to quantify tacrolimus (TAC) in liver biopsies after hepatic transplantation and to evaluate the predictive value of either tissue or blood TAC concentrations for rejection in 146 adult patients under a TAC-based immunosuppression. Trough blood levels were monitored daily during the hospital stay by immunoassay. Liver biopsies were routinely performed at day 7 posttransplantation. The tissue assay was developed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. The limit of quantification was 5 pg/mg, with intra- and interassay precision ranging from 3.9% to 14.3% and 4.7% to 15.9%, respectively. The extraction efficiency was approximately 80%. TAC found in liver biopsies ranged from less than 5 up to 387 pg/mg. Blood TAC levels ranged from 2.7 to 19.3 ng/mL. Tissue levels displayed excellent correlation with liver histopathologic BANFF rejection score, whereas blood levels did not. Clinically significant rejections (BANFF scores > or = 6) were characterized by mean TAC tissue and blood concentration of 13.1 pg/mg and 7.6 ng/mL, respectively, whereas these mean values became, respectively, 74.9 pg/mg (P < 0.05) and 7.1 ng/mL (not significant) for nonclinically significant rejection episodes (BANFF < 6). In this study, hepatic tissue TAC concentrations were distributed in a wider range and displayed a significantly better correlation with the severity of the organ rejection than predose blood levels. A tissue TAC concentration less than 30 pg/mg is 89% sensitive and 98% specific to discriminate clinically significant cellular rejection. Further studies are required to better understand the factors affecting TAC distribution within liver tissue (such as carrier proteins and cytochrome genetic polymorphism, liver function, age, hepatic blood flow, type of organ transplanted, time posttransplantation) and to define its value in the treatment of liver allograft rejection.

Switchability of neoral and equoral according to Food and Drug Administration rules and regulations

According to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), if a drug product contains a drug substance that is chemically identical and is delivered to the site of action at the same rate and extent as another drug product, then it is equivalent and can be substituted (switchable) for that drug product. Methods used to define bioequivalence as stated by the FDA rules (FDA 21 CFR 320, 24) are (1) pharmacokinetic (PK) studies in healthy volunteers, (2) comparative clinical trials, and (3) pharmacodynamic (PD) studies (bioactivity). We evaluated the switchability of Equoral (IVAX-USA) with Neoral (Novartis Switzerland using all FDA rules. In a single oral dose, we undertook a comparative bioavailability study of Equoral (IVAX, USA) Neoral (Novartis, USA), and Neoral (Novartis UK). The pharmacokinetics of Equoral and Neoral were determined with blood levels at 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48 hours. The area under curve (AUC), AUC extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-inf), rate of absorption (Tmax), extent of absorption (Cmax), half time (t1/2) of Equoral and Neoral were all within the 90% confidence interval of 80% to 125% boundaries. A comparative multinational multicenter clinical trial in stable renal transplant patients included 70 patients (22 women and 48 men) of mean age of 33 years (range, 26 to 43) was performed in Turkey, Lebanon, and Pakistan. In this study the ratios of LSM and the 90% confidence intervals for the Nontransformed/Parameters (AUC0-t, AUCinf, Tmax, and Cmax) of Equoral and Neoral SGC were 98% and 95%, respectively, which are within the 80% to 125% FDA acceptance range. For immunosuppressive drugs, the site of action is the lymphocyte and the measurable response is the decrease in lymphocyte count caused by the relative concentration of the drug in the lymphocyte. In a controlled switch, fixed-dose study, both Equoral and Neoral achieved the same concentration in the lymphocytes and caused the same degree of lymphocyte count reduction. The results of the testing (bioavailability-bioequivalence, clinical studies, and pharmacodynamic-bioactivity) required by FDA for interchangeability ("switchability") of immunosuppressive agents suggests that Neoral and Equoral are switchable.