Living related liver transplantation in 13 cases of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis

Recent updates on progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis types 1, 2 and 3: Outcome and therapeutic strategies

Recent evidence points towards the role of genotype to understand the phenotype, predict the natural course and long term outcome of patients with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC). Expanded role of the heterozygous transporter defects presenting late needs to be suspected and identified. Treatment of pruritus, nutritional rehabilitation, prevention of fibrosis progression and liver transplantation (LT) in those with end stage liver disease form the crux of the treatment. LT in PFIC has its own unique issues like high rates of intractable diarrhoea, growth failure; steatohepatitis and graft failure in PFIC1 and antibody-mediated bile salt export pump deficiency in PFIC2. Drugs inhibiting apical sodium-dependent bile transporter and adenovirus-associated vector mediated gene therapy hold promise for future.

Clinical outcomes of surgical management for rare types of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis: a case series

Background

Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) is a heterogeneous group of genetic autosomal recessive diseases that cause severe cholestasis, which progresses to cirrhosis and liver failure, in infancy or early childhood. We herein report the clinical outcomes of surgical management in patients with four types of PFIC.

Case presentation

Six patients diagnosed with PFIC who underwent surgical treatment between 1998 and 2020 at our institution were retrospectively assessed. Living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) was performed in 5 patients with PFIC. The median age at LDLT was 4.8 (range: 1.9–11.4) years. One patient each with familial intrahepatic cholestasis 1 (FIC1) deficiency and bile salt export pump (BSEP) deficiency died after LDLT, and the four remaining patients, one each with deficiency of FIC1, BSEP, multidrug resistance protein 3 (MDR3), and tight junction protein 2 (TJP2), survived. One FIC1 deficiency recipient underwent LDLT secondary to deterioration of liver function, following infectious enteritis. Although he underwent LDLT accompanied by total external biliary diversion, the patient died because of PFIC-related complications. The other patient with FIC1 deficiency had intractable pruritus and underwent partial internal biliary diversion (PIBD) at 9.8 years of age, pruritus largely resolved after PIBD. One BSEP deficiency recipient, who had severe graft damage, experienced recurrence of cholestasis due to the development of antibodies against BSEP after LDLT, and eventually died due to graft failure. The other patient with BSEP deficiency recovered well after LDLT and there was no evidence of posttransplant recurrence of cholestasis. In contrast, recipients with MDR3 or TJP2 deficiency showed good courses and outcomes after LDLT.

Conclusions

Although LDLT was considered an effective treatment for PFIC, the clinical courses and outcomes after LDLT were still inadequate in patients with FIC1 and BSEP deficiency. LDLT accompanied by total biliary diversion may not be as effective for patients with FIC1 deficiency.

Long-term liver transplant outcomes for progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 1: The Pittsburgh experience

BACKGROUND

Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 1 (PFIC1) arises from biallelic variants in the ATP8B1 gene that annul FIC1 activity, resulting in progressive liver disease. Liver transplant (LT) is indicated in refractory disease; however, post-LT complications including worsening diarrhea and steatohepatitis progressing to fibrosis with graft loss have been reported. We aim to describe long-term outcomes of PFIC1 LT recipients at our center, focusing on the histological changes of the allografts.

METHODS

We assessed 7 PFIC1 patients post-LT at the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh (CHP). All pre-transplant, explant, and sequential post-transplant pathology samples were reviewed. Continuous data are presented as the mean ± SD. We compared the pre- and post-transplant height and weight z-scores using Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

Seven (29% male) patients with PFIC1 received a LT (n = 6) or had post-LT care (n = 1) at CHP. Six had confirmed or suspected identical genetic. At a mean follow-up of 10.9 years, both patient survival and graft survival were 100%. Diarrhea persisted (n = 3) or newly developed (n = 4) in all patients after LT contributing to ongoing growth failure, with mean z-scores -2.63 (weight) and -2.98 (height) at follow-up. Histologically, allograft steatosis was common but was not accompanied by significant inflammation, ballooning, or fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

We show that extrahepatic disease persists and near-universal allograft steatosis occurs. However, at a mean follow-up period of over 10 years, no patients developed steatohepatitis or significant fibrosis, and both patient survival and graft survival are excellent.

Single-center experience in management of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) is an autosomal recessively inherited disease that causes intrahepatic-hepatocellular cholestasis. PFIC constitutes approximately 10-15% of cholestatic liver diseases in children. The aim of this study is to draw attention to this group of diseases, which pose a higher risk, in societies where consanguineous marriage is more common, and to share our experiences since the studies in the literature, regarding this group of diseases are case series with small number of patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted on 34 patients who were admitted with jaundice and diagnosed by genetic analysis, between January 2015 and July 2020.

RESULTS

We found 17.6% of patients with PFIC type 1, 55.9% patients had PFIC type 2, 14.7% patients had PFIC type 3, 8.8% patients had PFIC type 4 and 2.9% patients had PFIC type 5. Partial internal biliary diversion was performed in 5 (14.7%) patients, who had severe itching during follow-up, did not respond to medical treatment, and did not have significant fibrosis in liver biopsy yet. The degree of itching before PIBD was rated as +4 (cutaneous erosion, bleeding and scarring), in 5 patients and the rates were 0 (absent) in two patients, and +1 (mild itching) in 3 patients, 6 months after PIBD, these differences were statistically significant(p = 0.027). The mean weight z score was-1.43 (-3.72-+0.73), before PIBD, while it was 0.39(-1.86 -+2.45), six months after PIBD; the diference was statistically significant(p = 0.043). Liver transplantation was performed in 12 (35.3%) patients with significant fibrosis in liver biopsy and developing signs of portal hypertension.

CONCLUSION

The PFIC disease group is a heterogeneous disease group that is difficult to diagnose and treat. It should be considered in patients with cholestasis and/or pruritus and those with a history of consanguineous marriage between parents and death of a sibling with similar clinical symptoms.

Liver Transplantation in Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis with Normal Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase: Evaluation of Post-transplant Steatosis and Steatohepatitis

Background: Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis is a disease presenting with severe cholestasis and progressing to the end-stage liver disease later. Liver transplantation is a treatment modality available for progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis, especially in patients with end-stage liver disease or those who are unsuitable for or have failed biliary diversion. Objectives: To evaluate clinical and pathological characteristics of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis patients who had undergone liver transplantation and to determine post-transplant steatosis and steatohepatitis. Methods: We evaluated 111 progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis patients with normal gamma-glutamyl transferase that performed liver transplantation in Shiraz Transplant Center in Iran between March 2000 and March 2017. Results: The most common clinical manifestations were jaundice and pruritus. Growth retardation and diarrhea were detected in 76.6% and 42.5% of the patients. After transplantation, growth retardation was seen in 31.5% of the patients, and diarrhea in 36.9% of them. Besides, 29.1% of the patients died post-transplant. Post-transplant liver biopsies were taken from 50 patients, and 15 (30%) patients had steatosis or steatohepatitis, five of whom (10%) had macrovesicular steatosis alone, and 10 (20%) had steatohepatitis. Only one patient showed moderate bridging fibrosis (stage III), and none of them showed severe fibrosis. Conclusions: Liver transplantation is the final treatment option for these patients, and it can relieve most clinical manifestations. However, post-transplant mortality rate was relatively high in our center. Diarrhea, growth retardation, and steatosis are unique post-transplant complications in these patients. The rate of post-transplant steatosis and steatohepatitis in patients with liver biopsy in our study was 30%, with a significant difference from previous studies.

Biliary drainage as treatment for allograft steatosis following liver transplantation for PFIC-1 disease: A single-center experience

Development of macrovesicular steatosis post-LT in patients with PFIC-1 is increasingly being observed, with the etiology not fully understood. We highlight successful and effective EBD for reversal of allograft steatosis in 2 patients with PFIC-1 disease and discuss our experience with internal biliary diversion in this patient population.

Genetic, hematological, and immunological disorders transmissible with liver transplantation

It is well recognized that solid organ transplantation can transmit bacterial infection and chronic viral hepatitis as well as certain cancers. As indications for liver transplantation (LT) have expanded, it has been used to treat and even cure certain genetic cholestatic disorders, urea cycle defects, and coagulation abnormalities; many of these conditions are potentially transmissible with LT as well. It is important for clinicians and transplant patients to be aware of these potentially transmissible conditions as unexplained post-LT complications can sometimes be related to donor transmission of disease and thus should prompt a thorough exploration of the donor allograft history. Herein, we will review the reported genetic, metabolic, hematologic, and immunological disorders that are transmissible with LT and describe clinical scenarios in which these cases have occurred, such as in inadvertent or recognized transplantation of a diseased organ, domino transplantation, and with living related liver donation. Liver Transplantation 23 663-678 2017 AASLD.

Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis (PFIC) in Indian Children: Clinical Spectrum and Outcome

OBJECTIVE

To study the clinical and laboratory profile of children with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) and evaluate their outcome.

METHODS

The study is a retrospective review of all cases diagnosed with PFIC between January 2011 and July 2015. All children underwent histopathological examination and immunostaining. Management was done as per institute's protocol.

RESULTS

There were a total of 24 PFIC cases (PFIC 1-2, PFIC 2-19, PFIC 3-3). Eleven presented as neonatal cholestasis, whereas 13 others presented after 6 months of life. Median age of presentation in PFIC 2 was 5.5 months with a time lag of 13 months in diagnosis. PFIC 1 and 2 presented in infancy, whereas PFIC 3 presented late. Familial clustering was seen in 12 of 24 cases. Pruritus resolved with medical management in two-thirds of cases, 3 cases required biliary diversion (BD) with dramatic improvement. One child improved after liver transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

PFIC accounts for 8% of neonatal cholestasis and 34% of cholestasis in older children with PFIC 2 being the commonest subtype. Medical therapy is successful in majority. Partial internal BD should be offered to non-cirrhotic low gamma glutamyl transferase PFIC with intractable pruritus. Progression to cirrhosis may be prevented or delayed by early diagnosis and timely intervention.

Outcome of partial internal biliary diversion for intractable pruritus in children with cholestatic liver disease

PURPOSE

Children with cholestatic disorders have undergone liver transplantation for intractable pruritus unresponsive to medical therapy even in the absence of liver failure. Biliary diversion procedures interrupt the entero-hepatic circulation of bile acids allowing them to be excreted in the feces thereby lowering the total bile acid pool. We evaluated the outcome of partial internal biliary diversion (PIBD) in children with intractable pruritus from inherited cholestatic disorders.

METHODS

The records of children who underwent PIBD over a 4-year period were reviewed for etiology of liver disease, demographic data, preoperative and postoperative biochemical profile and improvement of pruritus. Standard statistical methods were used for analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 12 children, 10 had progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) and 2 had Alagille syndrome (AS). PIBD was done using an isolated jejunal loop as a conduit from gall bladder to mid ascending colon. Median period of follow up was 30 months. Pruritus resolved in nine children with significant reduction of serum bile acids (P < 0.02).

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the largest reported series of children with PIBD. PIBD is a safe, well-tolerated and effective alternative to liver transplant in children with PFIC and AS who have intractable pruritus in the absence of synthetic liver failure.

Recovery of graft steatosis and protein-losing enteropathy after biliary diversion in a PFIC 1 liver transplanted child

PFIC 1 is a genetic disorder characterized by hepatic and gastrointestinal disease, often requiring LT during childhood. Extrahepatic symptoms, such as diarrhea and malabsorption, do not improve or may be aggravated after LT, as graft steatosis or steatohepatitis as consequences of the interaction between transplanted liver and native bowel. We describe a patient with PFIC 1 who presented with cholestasis in infancy, who developed intractable pruritus and liver fibrosis. The child underwent living donor LT at 3.6 yr of age, and he early developed severe refractory diarrhea, secondary malabsorption with protein-losing enteropathy, and an early fatty liver disease trough graft steatohepatitis. As the response to cholestyramine was unsatisfactory, we decided to perform an EBD by using the jejunal loop used for the cholangiojejunostomy. Diarrhea resolved rapidly after surgery. He remained well after six months following biliary diversion, with normal stool output and no protein loss. We documented a dramatic improvement of graft steatosis at histology as well as normalization of liver function test. EBD can be considered a valuable treatment option to avoid organ disfunction and loss in PFIC 1 transplanted patients who develop graft steatohepatitis.

Therapeutic interventions in progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis: experience from a tertiary care centre in north India

Medical therapy has limited value in managing symptoms of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC). Liver transplantation (LT) is the only definite therapy for progressive liver failure and intractable pruritis. In recent years, biliary diversion (BD) has also shown therapeutic promise. This study was designed to review the experience of management and outcome of seven PFIC patients. Two children each had type II and III and three had type I/II PFIC, respectively. Medical treatment was successful in only one. Decompensated cirrhosis had already set in four children. They underwent a living related LT. There was one post transplant mortality. Remaining all children had a normal graft function at a mean follow-up of 50 months. One patient of PFIC type I/II received internal and another of PFIC type II received external BD. Both patients were asymptomatic at follow-up of 19 and 23 months respectively. Nontransplant surgical options should be offered to noncirrhotic children with PFIC.

The Multiple Facets of ABCB4 (MDR3) Deficiency

ABCB4 (MDR3), a lipid translocator, moves phosphatidylcholine from the inner to the outer leaflet of the canalicular membrane. Genetic mutations of ABCB4 lead to three distinct but related hepatobiliary diseases. Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) type 3 is a chronic cholestatic syndrome characterized by a markedly elevated gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase. Patients present with jaundice, pruritus, and hepatosplenomegaly. Periportal inflammation progresses to biliary cirrhosis and causes portal hypertension. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) normalizes liver function tests in approximately one half of treated PFIC type 3 patients. Partial responders or nonresponders eventually will require liver transplantation. Gallstone patients with ABCB4 mutations may have low phospholipid-associated cholelithiasis syndrome, characterized by cholesterol gallstones and intrahepatic microlithiasis, along with recurrent biliary symptoms, despite cholecystectomy. Patients with ABCB4 mutations also may develop intrahepatic brown pigment stones. UDCA may improve biliary symptoms even before the dissolution of stones occurs. Additional therapies such as farnesoid X receptor ligands/agonists and benzfibrates show future therapeutic promise. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy affects pregnant women with abnormal ABCB4. These women suffer from disabling pruritus and also may experience steatorrhea. Fetuses are at high risk for prematurity and stillbirths. The definitive treatment is delivery of the baby. In the interim, limited fat intake, fat-soluble vitamin supplementation, and UDCA with or without S-adenosylmethionine can provide symptomatic relief. Additional hepatobiliary diseases related to ABCB4 mutations are likely to be identified. This may result in the discovery of additional therapies for PFIC type 3, gallstones, and intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.

Living-donor liver transplantation for progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis

BACKGROUND

Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) results in liver cirrhosis during the disease course, although the etiology includes unknown mechanisms. Some PFIC patients require liver transplantation (LT).

METHODS

In this study, 11 patients with PFIC type 1 (PFIC1) and 3 patients with PFIC type 2 (PFIC2) who underwent living-donor LT (LDLT) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Digestive symptoms after LDLT were confirmed in 10 PFIC1 recipients (90.9%); 8 PFIC1 recipients showed steatosis after LDLT (72.7%), which began during the early postoperative period (71.5±55.1 days). Seven of the eight steatosis-positive PFIC1 recipients (87.5%) showed a steatosis degree of ≥80%, which was complicated with steatohepatitis and resulted in fibrosis. Cirrhotic findings persisted in six PFIC1 recipients even after LDLT (54.5%), and three PFIC1 recipients finally died. The survival rates of the PFIC1 recipients at 5, 10, and 15 years were 90.9%, 72.7%, and 54.5%, respectively. In contrast, the PFIC2 recipients showed good courses and outcomes without any steatosis after LDLT.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical courses and outcomes after LDLT are still not sufficient in PFIC1 recipients owing to steatosis/steatohepatitis and subsequent fibrosis, in contrast to PFIC2 recipients. PFIC2 is good indication for LDLT. PFIC1 patients require LT during the disease course; therefore, we suggest that the therapeutic strategies for PFIC1 patients, including the timing of LDLT, under the donor limitation should be reconsidered. The establishment of more advanced treatments for PFIC1 patients is required to improve the long-term prognosis of these patients.

Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis: a single-center experience of living-donor liver transplantation during two decades in Japan

BACKGROUND

Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) results in liver cirrhosis. Therefore, some PFIC patients require liver transplantation (LT). Although three types of PFIC have been identified, their etiologies include unknown mechanisms.

PATIENTS

A total of 717 recipients who underwent living-donor LT (LDLT) at <20 yr old were enrolled in this study. Among these recipients, 14 PFIC recipients comprising 11 PFIC type 1 (PFIC1) and three PFIC type 2 (PFIC2) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Three of 11 PFIC1 recipients died, while all three PFIC2 recipients survived. Eight of 11 PFIC1 recipients showed steatosis after LDLT. Among the eight steatosis-positive PFIC1 recipients, seven showed severe steatosis and seven were complicated with steatohepatitis. Nine of 11 PFIC1 recipients showed fibrosis after LDLT, and eight of the nine fibrosis-positive PFIC1 recipients showed severe fibrosis. In contrast to the PFIC1 recipients, the PFIC2 recipients did not show any steatosis or fibrosis after LDLT.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical courses and outcomes of PFIC1 recipients after LDLT are still not sufficient owing to steatosis/fibrosis, unlike the case for PFIC2 recipients. As PFIC1 patients will require LT during the long-term progression of the disease, further strategy improvements are required for PFIC1 patients.

Recurrent low gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase cholestasis following liver transplantation for bile salt export pump (BSEP) disease (posttransplant recurrent BSEP disease)

Bile salt export pump (BSEP) deficiency is a hereditary cholestatic syndrome that results from mutations in the ABCB11 (ATP-binding cassette B11) gene. Severely affected patients develop end-stage liver disease in the first decade of life. Liver transplantation has traditionally been thought of as curative for BSEP disease. We describe the clinical course of 6 patients who developed recurrent low gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase cholestasis, that mimicks BSEP disease, following transplantation. All had documented genetic defects in ABCB11 that were predicted to lead to a congenital absence of BSEP protein. The time to development of recurrence was variable; 4 underwent repeat liver transplantation for complications of recurrent disease and all 4 again developed recurrent disease after retransplantation. Siblings of these patients who also underwent liver transplantation for BSEP disease have not developed "recurrent" disease. Three of the patients with "recurrent" disease ultimately died, 2 as a direct result of complications of their liver disease.

Liver disease associated with canalicular transport defects: current and future therapies

Bile formation at the canalicular membrane is a delicate process. This is illustrated by inherited liver diseases due to mutations in ATP8B1, ABCB11, ABCB4, ABCC2 and ABCG5/8, all encoding hepatocanalicular transporters. Effective treatment of these canalicular transport defects is a clinical and scientific challenge that is still ongoing. Current evidence indicates that ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) can be effective in selected patients with PFIC3 (ABCB4 deficiency), while rifampicin reduces pruritus in patients with PFIC1 (ATP8B1 deficiency) and PFIC2 (ABCB11 deficiency), and might abort cholestatic episodes in BRIC (mild ATP8B1 or ABCB11 deficiency). Cholestyramine is essential in the treatment of sitosterolemia (ABCG5/8 deficiency). Most patients with PFIC1 and PFIC2 will benefit from partial biliary drainage. Nevertheless liver transplantation is needed in a substantial proportion of these patients, as it is in PFIC3 patients. New developments in the treatment of canalicular transport defects by using nuclear receptors as a target, enhancing the expression of the mutated transporter protein by employing chaperones, or by mutation specific therapy show substantial promise. This review will focus on the therapy that is currently available as well as on those developments that are likely to influence clinical practice in the near future.

Allograft steatohepatitis in progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 1 after living donor liver transplantation

We studied histological features and long-term outcomes in patients with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 1 (PFIC1) after liver transplantation (LT). Histological findings were correlated with the post-LT course and treatment in 11 recipients with PFIC1. Ages at LT varied from 1 to 18 years (median, 4 years). Macrovesicular steatosis was observed in 8 patients at a median of 60 days post-LT (range, 21-191 days). Severe steatosis progressed to steatohepatitis in 7 patients at a median of 161 days (range, 116-932 days). The patients were followed up for a median of 7.3 years (range, 2.3-16.1 years). Six showed bridging fibrosis, with 2 progressing to cirrhosis. One patient with cirrhosis died because of the rupture of a splenic artery aneurysm 13.6 years post-LT. Post-LT refractory diarrhea was present in all 8 having steatosis. Three without post-LT diarrhea showed no allograft steatosis. Bile adsorptive resin therapy reduced the diarrhea and steatosis. Patients with posttransplant steatosis typically had more severe mutations of the ATPase class I type 8B member 1 (ATP8B1) gene and were more likely to have systemic complications such as pancreatitis. In conclusion, allograft steatosis was present in patients with PFIC1, progressing to steatohepatitis and cirrhosis. Because expression of the familial intrahepatic cholestasis 1 gene occurs in several organs, including the small intestine, pancreas, and liver, and it is involved in enterohepatic bile acid circulation, post-LT steatosis may be due to a malfunction of the ATP8B1 product.

Metabolic liver disease in children

The aim of this article is to provide essential information for hepatologists, who primarily care for adults, regarding liver-based inborn errors of metabolism with particular reference to those that may be treatable with liver transplantation and to provide adequate references for more in-depth study should one of these disease states be encountered.

Metabolic liver disease in children

The aim of this article is to provide essential information for hepatologists, who primarily care for adults, regarding liver-based inborn errors of metabolism with particular reference to those that may be treatable with liver transplantation and to provide adequate references for more in-depth study should one of these disease states be encountered.

Partial internal biliary diversion through a cholecystojejunocolonic anastomosis--a novel surgical approach for patients with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis: a preliminary report

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to describe the initial experience with a novel approach to the surgical treatment of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC), avoiding the creation of a permanent stoma.

METHODS

Two teenaged patients, aged 15 and 17 years, underwent partial internal biliary diversion to treat uncontrollable pruritus associated with PFIC. The surgical technique involved the creation of an isolated jejunal conduit, anastomosed proximally in a terminolateral fashion to the gallbladder and distally to the ascending colon. This operation combines the advantages of partially diverting the biliary flow from the enterohepatic cycle, avoiding an external biliary fistula. In one of the patients, this technique was used as a primary procedure, whereas in the other, a previous partial external diversion was converted to an internal diversion.

RESULTS

Both patients had complete resolution of their pruritus and normalization of hepatic laboratory tests. One of the patients developed a mild choleretic diarrhea that can be controlled with eventual use of cholestyramine. No complications were observed related to this operation.

CONCLUSIONS

Biliary diversion appears to be a very attractive surgical option for the treatment of PFIC in children with a normal gallbladder. Long-term follow-up is necessary to evaluate late results and eventual complications of this approach.

Safety of living-related liver transplantation for progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis

Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) is a severe cholestatic liver disease of early life often requiring liver transplantation. Organ shortage leads to consider living-related liver transplantation. Because of possible partial metabolic defect in heterozygotes, the use of familial donors might be questionable. We therefore evaluated the safety of this procedure, for both donors and recipients. We compared a series of seven parental-children pairs, having participated in the living related liver transplant program for PFIC between 1994 and 2001, with that of a series of seven parental-children pairs, performed for biliary atresia (BA) during the same period. No primary graft dysfunction was observed. There was no difference in the course of transaminases, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase and bilirubin levels after transplantation in both donor and recipient series. Thirteen recipients and 14 donors are alive and well 3-10 yr post-surgery. One PFIC recipient died nine months post-orthotopic liver transplantation from sepsis. We conclude that PFIC heterozygote status of the donor does not increase the risk of liver dysfunction in either recipients or donors, with a similar course compared with BA recipients and donors.