Inferior mesenteric venous left renal vein shunting for decompression of excessive portal hypertension in adult living related liver transplantation

Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver clinical practice guidelines on liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is a highly complex and challenging field of clinical practice. Although it was originally developed in western countries, it has been further advanced in Asian countries through the use of living donor liver transplantation. This method of transplantation is the only available option in many countries in the Asia-Pacific region due to the lack of deceased organ donation. As a result of this clinical situation, there is a growing need for guidelines that are specific to the Asia-Pacific region. These guidelines provide comprehensive recommendations for evidence-based management throughout the entire process of liver transplantation, covering both deceased and living donor liver transplantation. In addition, the development of these guidelines has been a collaborative effort between medical professionals from various countries in the region. This has allowed for the inclusion of diverse perspectives and experiences, leading to a more comprehensive and effective set of guidelines.

Makeshift Shunts in Extrahepatic Portal Vein Obstruction in Pediatric Population

Background and Objectives

More than 20% of patients with extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO) may be deemed as nonshuntable due to lack of a suitable vein. The role of "makeshift shunts" or "lesser shunts" assumes importance in such cases. In this report, the authors have shared their experience with the makeshift shunts in the management of portal hypertension in children with emphasis upon anatomic considerations, resolution of symptoms, outcomes after surgery, and shunt patency.

Materials and Methods

During the period 1983-2018, 138 children with portal hypertension were managed under the care of a single surgeon (VB). Of them, 134 were EHPVO. Children with EHPVO were treated with splenectomy and proximal lienorenal shunt (n = 107), splenectomy and devascularization (n = 21), and makeshift shunts (n = 6). Makeshift shunts comprised (i) side-to-side right gastroepiploic vein (Rt-GEV) to left renal vein (LRV) shunt (n = 1), (ii) superior mesenteric vein (SMV) to inferior vena cava (IVC) shunt using a spiral saphenous venous graft (n = 1), (iii) side-to-side inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) to LRV shunt (n = 2), (iv) side-to-side IMV to IVC shunt (n = 1), (v) end-to-side IMV to IVC shunt (n = 1), and (vi) side-to-side IMV to LRV shunt (n = 1) in a case of crossed fused renal ectopia.

Results

Following the creation of portosystemic shunt, a decline in portal pressure was demonstrated in all six patients. There was resolution of symptoms including hematemesis, melena, and anorectal variceal bleed. None of the patients demonstrated the features of hepatic encephalopathy. The associated portal cavernoma cholangiopathy (n = 1) also resolved following Rt-GEV to LRV shunt. Shunt patency was documented for the entire duration of follow-up (1.5-4 years) in five of six patients; the sixth patient demonstrated shunt block at 6-month follow-up but without recurrence of symptoms.

Conclusions

Makeshift shunts offer a viable alternative to standard portosystemic shunting in pediatric patients with a nonshuntable vein. The selection of such shunts is, however, subject to surgeon's preferences and has to be individualized to local anatomy.

Functional side-to-side splenorenal shunts to treat extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis in children

BACKGROUND

Surgical shunts are commonly used to manage complications resulting from extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis (EHPVT) in children. We describe a single-center experience utilizing a functional Side-to-Side Splenorenal Shunt (fSRS), created using either an enlarged inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) or left adrenal vein (LAV).

METHODS

Pediatric patients with isolated EHPVT who were poor candidates for a Rex shunt and who underwent a fSRS procedure at our institution between 2003 and 2020 were reviewed. The pre/post shunt portosystemic gradient change, rates of early and late complications, postoperative shunt patency, and mortality were evaluated.

RESULTS

Twelve EHPVT patients (mean age of 6.1 years) underwent a fSRS procedure. The mean portosystemic gradient change for the cohort was -11.7 mmHg (±4.9). There were no cases of recurrent variceal bleeding or episodes of shunt thrombosis reported after fSRS procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical shunts continue to be an important adjunct in the treatment of complications related to EHPVT. The functional Side-to-Side Splenorenal Shunt is a safe alternative that is easy to perform, involves minimal dissection and requires only a single anastomosis.

The inferior mesoiliacal shunt: A novel shunt for refractory rectal variceal bleeding due to splanchnic thrombosis

Surgical shunt therapy may be required when pharmacologic, endoscopic, and radiologic treatment of chronic splanchnic vein thrombosis have failed. In this case report, we present a new interposition shunt for the treatment of refractory rectal variceal bleeding: the inferior mesoiliacal shunt between the inferior mesenteric vein and the left common iliac vein using a cryopreserved iliac venous graft. The postoperative course was complicated by shunt thrombosis at day 2, probably owing to inadvertent interruption of anticoagulation and a decrease in the shunt flow rate. Surgical thrombectomy was performed successfully. The patient presented no relapse of rectal bleeding and was asymptomatic and well at the 12-month follow-up.

Portal Vein Pressure Change Predicts Posthepatectomy Liver Failure Following Right Lobectomy

The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of intraoperative portal venous pressure (PVP) as a predictor of posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). Hepatic functional reserve is typically evaluated by using parameters such as albumin level, platelet count, prothrombin activity level, or indocyanine green retention rate at 15 minutes. Low hepatic functional reserve can enhance the risk of PHLF. We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 35 patients who underwent right lobectomy and intraoperative PVP measurements between April 2004 and August 2012. According to preoperative prediction scores, all patients were within a safe limit for right lobectomy. The patients were grouped into uncomplicated (n = 22) and PHLF (n = 13) groups by postoperative course. PHLF was defined as grade B or C according to International Study Group of Liver Surgery criteria. Patient background, intraoperative bleeding, operative time, and PVP elevation after hepatectomy (ΔPVP) grade were compared between the groups. No cases of in-hospital death occurred. Univariate analysis revealed significant differences in preoperative white blood counts, intraoperative bleeding, and ΔPVP between the groups (P < 0.05). The ΔPVP was an independent risk factor on multivariate analysis. A ΔPVP >3 cmH2O was associated with PHLF at 69.2% sensitivity and 90.9% specificity. Following right lobectomy, a ΔPVP >3 cmH2O indicates a risk of PHLF and warrants careful postoperative management.

Review of the surgical approach to prevent small-for-size syndrome in recipients after left lobe adult LDLT

Left lobe liver grafts increase the donor safety in adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplantation (ALDLT). However, the left lobe graft provides about 30-50 % of the required liver volume to adult recipients, which is insufficient to sustain their metabolic demands, which can lead to small-for-size syndrome (SFSS). Transient portal hypertension and microcirculatory hemodynamic derangement, apart from outflow obstruction, during the first week after reperfusion are the critical events associated with small-for-size graft transplantation. The incidence of SFSS in left lobe ALDLT can be decreased by increasing the left lobe graft volume by effective utilization of the caudate lobe with preserved vascular supply, by modulating the portal pressure with splenectomy or a porto-systemic shunt or by hepatic venous outflow reconstruction to prevent the development of venous congestion. In this review, we discuss the pathophysiology of SFSS and the various surgical strategies that can be performed to prevent SFSS in an effort to enhance the donor safety during living-donor liver transplantation.

Challenges and Outcome of Left-lobe Liver Transplants in Adult Living Donor Liver Transplants

Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplant (LDLT) frequently depend on using the right-lobes of the donor for obtaining adequate graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) of over 0.8% in the recipient. However, left-lobes remain an important option in adults, since the morbidity in the donor is considerably less with left donor hepatectomy when compared with right side liver resection. Further benefits of left-lobes in LDLT include more predictable anatomy of the left hepatic duct and left portal vein, which are usually long and single resulting in easier anastomosis in the recipient. Likewise, left-lobe grafts are easier to implant with an excellent venous outflow through the combined orifice of left and middle hepatic vein, as opposed to the complex hepatic vein reconstruction required in right-lobe grafts. However, left hepatic artery is often multiple unlike the right hepatic artery. The holy grail of left-lobe transplants is avoidance of small for size syndrome (SFSS) in the recipients. The strategies for overcoming SFSS currently depend on circumventing portal hyperperfusion in the graft. Measurement of portal pressure and modulating it if high, by splenic artery ligation, splenectomy, or hemiportocaval shunts are proving successful in avoiding SFSS. The future aim in adult LDLT should be to use the left-lobe as much as possible for the benefit of the donor at the same time avoiding SFSS even at very low GRWR for the benefit of the recipient.

Deconvolution assessment of splenic and splanchnic contributions to portal venous blood flow in liver cirrhosis

PURPOSE

To devise a noninvasive imaging method for resolving the relative contribution of splenic and splanchnic blood flow to portal venous flow and derive quantitative estimates for parameters pertaining to splenic and portal hemodynamics.

METHODS

Tracer concentration-time curves of the aorta, portal vein, and spleen can be extracted from dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) CT or MR images. A combination of two tracer analysis approaches, namely arterial-venous sampling and residual tracer deconvolution, is proposed to model these concentration-time curves and derive hemodynamic parameters pertaining to splenic and portal circulation. Clinical feasibility of the proposed method was explored using DCE CT datasets of eight cirrhotic patients. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to evaluate the confidence of the parameter estimates.

RESULTS

Portal blood flow was estimated to be 763.8 +/- 438.1 ml/min in cirrhotic patients and the splenic contribution was found to be elevated (0.75 +/- 0.22). Estimates of splenic blood flow (582 +/- 420 ml/min) and transit time (15.3 +/- 10.1 s) in cirrhotic patients were consistent with reported values obtained using duplex Doppler ultrasound and dynamic scintigraphy, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows the feasibility of noninvasive assessment of splenic and portal hemodynamic parameters by DCE imaging using a combination of tracer kinetics modeling techniques.

Method for spontaneous constriction and closure of portocaval shunt using a ligamentum teres hepatis in small-for-size graft liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

We have developed a new portocaval (PC) shunt creation technique for use in small-for-size (SFS) graft liver transplantations. PC shunts are already used to avoid SFS graft syndrome in cases of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), but the current method of creating these shunts is subject to two problems: reportal hypertension and liver dysfunction after premature ligation of the PC shunt; and graft atrophy and liver dysfunction because of the loss of portal venous flow late in the recovery period after LDLT.

METHODS

Our new technique avoids these two problems simultaneously by using the interposed obliterated ligamentum teres hepatis (LTH) to create the PC shunt, then obstructing the PC shunt after regeneration of the liver graft.

RESULTS

We have used this technique in four cases. In all cases, portal venous pressures after shunting were lower than those before shunting, and PC shunts with lower portal pressure were obstructed faster than that with higher portal pressure.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the LTH can function as a shape memory graft to reduce portal venous flow after regeneration of the graft liver. Using the LTH to create a PC shunt might help to prevent both SFS graft syndrome early in the recovery period after LDLT and loss of portal venous flow late in the recovery period.

Portal pressure <15 mm Hg is a key for successful adult living donor liver transplantation utilizing smaller grafts than before

To prevent small-for-size syndrome in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (A-LDLT), larger grafts (ie, right lobe grafts) have been selected in many transplant centers. However, some centers are investigating the benefits of portal pressure modulation. Five hundred sixty-six A-LDLT procedures using right or left lobe grafts were performed between 1998 and 2008. In 2006, we introduced intentional portal pressure control, and we changed the graft selection criteria to include a graft/recipient weight ratio >0.7% instead of the original value of >0.8%. All recipients were divided into period I (1998-2006, the era of unintentional portal pressure control; n = 432) and period II (2006-2008, the era of intentional portal pressure control; n = 134). The selection of small-for-size grafts increased from 7.8% to 23.9%, and the selection of left lobe grafts increased from 4.9% to 32.1%. Despite the increase in the number of smaller grafts in period II, 1-year patient survival was significantly improved (87.9% versus 76.2%). In 129 recipients in period II, portal pressure was monitored. Patients with a portal pressure <15 mm Hg demonstrated better 2-year survival (n = 86, 93.0%) than patients with a portal pressure >or=15 mm Hg (n = 43, 66.3%). The recovery from hyperbilirubinemia and coagulopathy after transplantation was significantly better in patients with a portal pressure <15 mm Hg. In conclusion, our strategy for A-LDLT has changed from larger graft-based A-LDLT to controlled portal pressure-based A-LDLT with smaller grafts. A portal pressure <15 mm Hg seems to be a key for successful A-LDLT.

A graft to body weight ratio less than 0.8 does not exclude adult-to-adult right-lobe living donor liver transplantation

Many centers require a minimal graft to body weight ratio (GBWR) >or= 0.8 as an arbitrary threshold to proceed with right-lobe living donor liver transplantation (RL-LDLT), and there is often hesitancy about transplanting lower volume living donor (LD) liver grafts into sicker patients. The data supporting this dogma, based on the early experience with RL-LDLT at Asian centers, are weak. To determine the effect of LD liver volume in the modern era, we investigated the impact of GBWR on the outcome of RL-LDLT with a GBWR as low as 0.6 at the University of Toronto. Between April 2000 and September 2008, 271 adult-to-adult RL-LDLT procedures and 614 deceased donor liver transplants were performed. Twenty-two living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) cases with a GBWR of 0.59 to 0.79 (group A) were compared with 249 LDLT cases with a GBWR >or= 0.8 (group B) and with 66 full-graft deceased donor liver transplants (group C), who were matched 3:1 according to donor and recipient age, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, and presence of hepatitis C and hepatocellular carcinoma with the low-GBWR group. Portal vein shunts were not used. Markers of reperfusion injury [aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT)], graft function (international normalized ratio and bilirubin), complications graded by the Clavien score, and graft and patient survival were compared. As expected, LD recipients had a significantly shorter cold ischemia time (94 +/- 43 minutes for A, 96 +/- 57 minutes for B, and 453 +/- 152 minutes for C, P = 0.0001). However, the peak AST, peak ALT, absolute decrease in the international normalized ratio, day 7 bilirubin level, postoperative creatinine clearance, complication rate graded by the Clavien score, and median hospital stay were similar in all groups. The rate of biliary complications was higher with LD grafts than deceased donor grafts (19% for A versus 10% for B and 0% for C, P = 0.2). Patient survival was similar in all groups at 1, 3, and 5 years (91% for A versus 89% for B and 93% for C at 1 year, 87% for A versus 81% for B and 89% for C at 3 years, and 83% for A versus 81% for B and 87% for C at 5 years, P = 0.63). A Cox proportional regression analysis revealed only hepatitis C virus as a risk factor for poorer graft survival and not GBWR as a continuous or categorical variable. In conclusion, we found no evidence of inferior outcomes with smaller size grafts versus larger size LD grafts or full-size deceased donor grafts. Further studies are warranted to examine the factors affecting the function of smaller grafts for living liver donation and thereby define the safe lower limits for transplantation.

Successful super-small-for-size graft liver transplantation by decompression of portal hypertension via splenectomy and construction of a mesocaval shunt: a case report

We performed a successful super-small-for-size graft liver transplantation by decompressing portal hypertension via splenectomy and a mesocaval shunt. A 46-year-old woman with Child-Pugh class C liver cirrhosis associated with Wilson's disease underwent a living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The donor had an anomalous portal vein, hepatic vein, and bile duct, so we had to use the right lateral segment for the graft. Preoperative computed tomographic (CT) volumetry showed the volume of this area to be 433 mL; graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) was 0.72; and graft-to-standard liver volume (GV/SLV) was 39.0%. However, the real volume of the resected right lateral segment was 281 g; GRWR was 0.47; and GV/SLV was 25.3%--a super-small-for-size graft. After implantation, congestion of the small graft was severe due to excessive portal hypertension. Therefore, we tried decompressing the portal vein. First, we performed splenectomy which reduced the portal pressure which remained excessive. Second, a mesocaval shunt was constructed decreasing the portal pressure from 38 to 30 cm H2O. Additionally, we initiated continuous portal injection of prostaglandin E1. The postoperative course was not smooth, but the general status slowly recovered. Over 25 cm H2O of portal hypertension was observed until postoperative day 21 when it improved. At last, the recipient was discharged on postoperative day 156. Accurate preoperative CT volumetry is important to obtain sufficient graft volume. Our case may be one of the smallest-for-size grafts that was successfully transplanted. Management of excessive portal hypertension is important for LDLT, especially using a small-for-size graft. Splenectomy and construction of a mesocaval shunt may be useful strategies to decompress the portal vein.

Effect of the portacaval shunt on reperfusion injury after 65% hepatectomy in pigs

BACKGROUND

Portal flow diversion by portacaval shunts (PCS) has been shown to prevent primary graft nonfunction in liver transplantation using small-for-size grafts. In this study, we examine whether PCS can improve reperfusion injury after major hepatectomy in pigs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 14 pigs, a partial PCS was constructed following 65% hepatectomy and 1 h of inflow ischemia. During 24 h of reperfusion, the shunt was either closed (group A, n = 7) or left open (group B, n = 7).

RESULTS

24 h after reperfusion, group A had higher levels of alanine aminotransferase (70 +/- 12 IU/l vs. 51 +/- 5.9 IU/l; p < 0.05), alanine aminotransferase per gram of liver remnant (0.41 +/- 0.07 IU/l/g vs. 0.21 +/- 0.05 IU/l/g; p < 0.05), prothrombin time (24.1 +/- 2.4 s vs. 14.3 +/- 2.9 s; p < 0.05), international normalized ratio (2.11 +/- 0.15 vs. 1.29 +/- 0.28; p < 0.05), hepatocyte necrosis scores and percentages of nuclei stained for proliferating cell nuclear antigen (52.57 +/- 8.9% vs. 36.71 +/- 6%; p < 0.05) compared to group B.

CONCLUSIONS

Partial portal flow diversion appears to attenuate reperfusion injury in a porcine model of major hepatectomy.

Beneficial Effect of Partial Portal Decompression Using the Inferior Mesenteric Vein for Intractable Gastroesophageal Variceal Bleeding in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Use of the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) for partial portal decompression has not been recommended as a first-line option for intractable gastroesophageal variceal bleeding because of the thin diameter of the vein. Although these indications remain relevant, few reports have compared partial portal decompression using the IMV with other therapies. We propose that partial portal decompression using the IMV is a useful alternative treatment for intractable variceal bleeding.

METHODS

We performed partial portal decompression using the IMV in eight patients with intractable variceal bleeding that had been uncontrolled using medical and endoscopic therapies. All patients were classified into Child's class B or C. The surgical data, morbidity, and mortality were assessed.

RESULTS

Mean portal venous pressure significantly decreased from 26.9 +/- 2.0 mmHg before the surgery to 19.8 +/- 3.9 mmHg after the surgery. The operative mortality rate was 0%. The mean duration of hospital stay was 25.5 +/- 13.3 days. Although one patient experienced recurrent bleeding, shunt patency was well maintained in all patients during the follow-up period (mean 28.9 +/- 14.1 months). Six patients are still alive and well without ascites or hepatic encephalopathy. Two of the Child's class C patients who underwent emergency shunt died owing to hepatic decompensation.

CONCLUSION

Partial portal decompression using the IMV can be a safe, effective way to treat intractable variceal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis. However, use of the shunt procedure may have the most survival benefits for cirrhotic patients with preserved liver function.

Liver regeneration is suppressed in small-for-size liver grafts after transplantation: involvement of c-Jun N-terminal kinase, cyclin D1, and defective energy supply

BACKGROUND

Small-for-size liver grafts have decreased survival compared to full-size grafts. This study investigated mechanisms of suppression of liver regeneration in small-for-size grafts.

METHODS

Rat liver explants were reduced in size to 50% and implanted into recipients of different body weights, resulting in graft weight/standard liver weights of approximately 50% (half-size) and approximately 25% (quarter-size).

RESULTS

Hepatic cellular 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation increased from 0.2% after sham operation to 2%, 18%, and 1.2% in full-size, half-size, and quarter-size grafts, respectively. Graft weight did not increase in full- and quarter-size grafts but increased 40% in half-size grafts. By contrast, apoptosis remained low (< or =0.7%) and stem cells did not increase in all conditions. Phospho-c-Jun increased 27-fold in half-size grafts but only sevenfold in quarter-size grafts. Activating protein-1 activation increased 14-fold in half-size grafts but only fivefold in quarter-size grafts. Cyclin D1 (CyD1), which was barely detectable in full- and quarter-size grafts, increased 8.3-fold in half-size grafts. Adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP) per gram tissue decreased 70% in quarter-size grafts. Treatment of quarter-size grafts with radical scavenging C. sinenesis polyphenols (20 microg/ml) increased BrdU labeling and weight gain to 35% and 56%, respectively, reversed inhibition of CyD1 expression, c-Jun phosphorylation, and AP-1 activation in quarter-size grafts compared to half-size grafts, and restored ATP levels to 75%.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver regeneration is stimulated in half-size grafts but suppressed in quarter-size grafts. Defective liver regeneration in small grafts is associated with an inhibition of the c-Jun N-terminal kinase/c-Jun and CyD1 pathways and compromised energy production.

Management of Major Portosystemic Shunting in Small-for-Size Adult Living-Related Donor Liver Transplantation with a Left-Sided Graft Liver

PURPOSE

We investigated the mechanisms of small-for-size graft syndrome by time-lag ligation, a novel approach to treating major portosystemic shunts in small-for-size adult living-related donor liver transplantation (LRDLT) using left-sided graft liver.

METHODS

Five patients with end-stage liver failure and major splenorenal shunting underwent LRDLT using left lobe grafts. The average graft volume to recipient body weight (GV/RBW) ratio was 0.68 +/- 0.14. Two patients underwent time-lag ligation of their splenorenal (SR) shunts on postoperative days (PODs) 8 and 14, respectively. The shunts of the other three patients were untreated.

RESULTS

The portal pressures in the first patient who underwent time-lag ligation rose above 300 mmH(2)O and remained there for 2 weeks. Thus, we ligated the SR shunt in the second patient on POD 14, resulting in an increase from 177 mmH(2)O to 258 mmH(2)O, but it decreased again thereafter. In the other three patients, the SR shunt was not ligated because portal blood flow volumes remained sufficient. Total bilirubin levels in the first time-lag ligation patient rose to 16 mg/dl, paralleling the rise in portal pressures. Although they increased after ligation in the second patient, they did not exceed 10 mg/dl.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend time-lag ligation if portal venous blood flow decreases in the early post-transplant period, but not until at least 2 weeks after transplantation. If the portal venous blood flow does not decrease, early postoperative ligation is unnecessary. If there are no major portosystemic shunts, making a portosystemic shunt might decompress excessive portal hypertension. With donor safety priority in LRDLT, novel approaches must be developed to enable the use of smaller donor grafts. We describe a potential means of using left lobe grafts in adult LRDLT.