Outcome Following Single vs Bilateral Lung Transplantation in Recipients 60 Years of Age and Older

Risk factors for mid- and long-term mortality in lung transplant recipients aged 70 years and older

OBJECTIVES

With increased lung transplantation in those aged 70 and older, limited literature addresses risk factors affecting their survival. Our study aims to identify independent factors impacting mid- and long-term mortality in this elderly population.

METHODS

This study analyzed lung transplant patients over 70 from May 2005 to December 2022 using United Network for Organ Sharing data. The 3- or 5-year cohort excluded multi-organ, secondary transplantation and loss to follow-up. Univariable Cox analysis was conducted to assess recipient, donor and transplant factors. Factors with a significance level of P < 0.2 were subsequently included in a multivariable Cox model to identify correlations with 3- and 5-year mortality in patients aged over 70.

RESULTS

Multivariable analysis has identified key factors affecting 3- and 5-year mortality in elderly lung transplant patients over 70. Common notable factors include recipient total bilirubin, intensive care unit status at the time of transplantation, donor diabetes, Cytomegalovirus (CMV) mismatch and single lung transplantation. Additionally, Hispanic/Latino patients and ischaemia time of the transplant significantly impact the 3-year mortality, while recipient age, diabetes, nitric oxide use before transplantation and creatinine were identified as unique independent risk factors affecting the 5-year morality.

CONCLUSIONS

The study identified several independent risk factors that impact the mid- and long-term survival of lung transplantation for individuals over 70 years. These findings can contribute to the optimization of lung transplant treatment strategies and perioperative management in elderly patients, thereby enhancing the survival rate of this age group.

Lung Transplantation Outcomes in Recipients Aged 70 Years or Older and the Impact of Center Volume

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate trends and outcomes of lung transplants (LTx) in recipients ≥ 70 years.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of the UNOS database identifying all patients undergoing LTx (May 2005-December 2022). Baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared by age (<70 years, ≥70 years) and center volume. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed with pairwise comparisons between subgroups.

RESULTS

34,957 patients underwent LTx, of which 3236 (9.3%) were ≥70 years. The rate of LTx in recipients ≥ 70 has increased over time, particularly in low-volume centers (LVCs); consequently, high-volume centers (HVCs) and LVCs perform similar rates of LTx for recipients ≥ 70. Recipients ≥ 70 had higher rates of receiving from donor after circulatory death lungs and of extended donor criteria. Recipients ≥ 70 were more likely to die of cardiovascular diseases or malignancy, while recipients < 70 of chronic primary graft failure. Survival time was shorter for recipients ≥ 70 compared to recipients < 70 old (hazard ratio (HR): 1.36, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.28-1.44, p < 0.001). HVCs were associated with a survival advantage in recipients < 70 (HR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.88-0.94, p < 0.001); however, in recipients ≥ 70, survival was similar between HVCs and LVCs (HR: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.99-1.25, p < 0.08). HVCs were more likely to perform a bilateral LTx (BLT) for obstructive lung diseases compared to LVCs, but there was no difference in BLT and single LTx likelihood for restrictive lung diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

Careful consideration is needed for recipient ≥ 70 selection, donor assessment, and post-transplant care to improve outcomes. Further research should explore strategies that advance perioperative care in centers with low long-term survival for recipients ≥ 70.

Characteristics, Trends, and Predictors of Specialty Palliative Care Utilization after Lung Transplantation

Background: Lung transplant recipients who experience serious illness could benefit from specialty palliative care (SPC), but evidence suggests that referral has been rare. Objective: Examine the characteristics of post-transplant SPC encounters, utilization trends, and patient characteristics associated with SPC at a center with established SPC services. Design: Retrospective cohort study of SPC utilization by 597 lung transplant recipients transplanted between 2010 and 2015. We collected data on pretransplant demographics and post-transplant SPC encounters, including timing, location, and referral reasons. Cumulative incidence of SPC and patient characteristics associated with SPC were examined by competing risks methods. Utilization in the first two post-transplant years was compared between subcohorts defined by year of transplantation. Results: SPC cumulative incidence was 27% and 43% at one and five years. More than 60% of encounters occurred in the first post-transplant year including 34% during the index transplant hospitalization. Over 90% of encounters occurred in the inpatient setting. The majority of consults were for symptom management. From 2010 to 2015 inpatient utilization in the first two post-transplant years increased from 23% to 42%, and outpatient utilization increased from 2% to 16%. Accounting for increasing utilization, pretransplant SPC and double-lung transplantation were associated with greater incidence of post-transplant SPC. Conclusions: Lung transplant recipients may have palliative care needs early after transplantation. Increasing utilization suggests greater awareness of or changing attitudes about the utility of SPC for lung transplant recipients. Understanding transplant recipients' palliative care needs and transplant physicians' views of SPC is critical to improving the provision of SPC in lung transplantation.

Lung transplantation in elderly patients

Consensus statements on the selection of lung transplant candidates have consistently identified older age as a relative contraindication to transplantation. A combination of population-level demographic changes, revision of the lung allocation score (LAS), and clearer data on outcomes in elderly transplant recipients has, however, driven a steady increase in the threshold at which age is taken into consideration. This article reviews the current state of lung transplantation in elderly patients with an emphasis on the factors that have increased lung transplantation in older age groups, their expected outcomes including survival and health-related quality of life, and the factors that go in to appropriate candidate and procedure selection in this population.

Onset of Inflammation With Ischemia: Implications for Donor Lung Preservation and Transplant Survival

Lungs stored ahead of transplant surgery experience ischemia. Pulmonary ischemia differs from ischemia in the systemic organs in that stop of blood flow in the lung leads to loss of shear alone because the lung parenchyma does not rely on blood flow for its cellular oxygen requirements. Our earlier studies on the ischemia-induced mechanosignaling cascade showed that the pulmonary endothelium responds to stop of flow by production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). We hypothesized that ROS produced in this way led to induction of proinflammatory mediators. In this study, we used lungs or cells subjected to various periods of storage and evaluated the induction of several proinflammatory mediators. Isolated murine, porcine and human lungs in situ showed increased expression of cellular adhesion molecules; the damage-associated molecular pattern protein high-mobility group box 1 and the corresponding pattern recognition receptor, called the receptor for advanced glycation end products; and induction stabilization and translocation of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α and its downstream effector VEGFA, all of which are participants in inflammation. We concluded that signaling with lung preservation drives expression of inflammatory mediators that potentially predispose the donor lung to an inflammatory response after transplant.

Lung transplantation: a treatment option in end-stage lung disease

BACKGROUND

Lung transplantation is the final treatment option in the end stage of certain lung diseases, once all possible conservative treatments have been exhausted. Depending on the indication for which lung transplantation is performed, it can improve the patient's quality of life (e.g., in emphysema) and/ or prolong life expectancy (e.g., in cystic fibrosis, pulmonary fibrosis, and pulmonary arterial hypertension). The main selection criteria for transplant candidates, aside from the underlying pulmonary or cardiopulmonary disease, are age, degree of mobility, nutritional and muscular condition, and concurrent extrapulmonary disease. The pool of willing organ donors is shrinking, and every sixth candidate for lung transplantation now dies while on the waiting list.

METHOD

We reviewed pertinent articles (up to October 2013) retrieved by a selective search in Medline and other German and international databases, including those of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT), Eurotransplant, the German Institute for Applied Quality Promotion and Research in Health-Care (Institut für angewandte Qualitätsförderung und Forschung im Gesundheitswesen, AQUA-Institut), and the German Foundation for Organ Transplantation (Deutsche Stiftung Organtransplantation, DSO).

RESULTS

The short- and long-term results have markedly improved in recent years: the 1-year survival rate has risen from 70.9% to 82.9%, and the 5-year survival rate from 46.9% to 59.6%. The 90-day mortality is 10.0%. The postoperative complications include acute (3.4%) and chronic (29.0%) transplant rejection, infections (38.0%), transplant failure (24.7%), airway complications (15.0%), malignant tumors (15.0%), cardiovascular events (10.9%), and other secondary extrapulmonary diseases (29.8%). Bilateral lung transplantation is superior to unilateral transplantation (5-year survival rate 57.3% versus 47.4%).

CONCLUSION

Seamless integration of the various components of treatment will be essential for further improvements in outcome. In particular, the follow-up care of transplant recipients should always be provided in close cooperation with the transplant center.

Multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae acquisition in lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) is a pathogen that emerged in the late twentieth century and was associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We report for the first time the outcomes of lung transplant recipients infected with CRKP or extended spectrum-β lactamases K. pneumoniae (ESBL-KP).

METHODS

Retrospective review of 136 lung transplant recipients who underwent transplantation between 2004 and 2007 in Rabin Medical Center, Israel.

MAIN RESULTS

There were 52 episodes of positive cultures for K. pneumoniae (KP) in 136 recipients - of them 11 (8.1%) with CRKP, 12 (8.8%) with ESBL-KP, and 29 (21.3%) with carbapenem-sensitive ESBL-negative KP. Isolation of CRKP/ESBL-KP was associated with death in the cohort (p < 0.0001) as well as recipients' age at transplantation (p < 0.005). Time-dependent age-adjusted CRKP or ESBL-KP acquisition was an independent factor for death in patients after lung transplant, compared to patients without KP isolation or carbapenem-sensitive ESBL-negative KP (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

CRKP and KP-ESBL acquisition was associated with reduced survival among lung transplant recipients.

Early outcome after single vs bilateral lung transplantation in older recipients

BACKGROUND

Lung transplantation (LT) has been increasingly performed in patients older than 60 years. The outcome of LT in this recipient age group has not been extensively analyzed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the early death (30 days) in LT recipients older than 60 years according to the type of procedure, that is, single vs bilateral LT.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our experience with older recipients between January 1999 and August 2007. Probability of survival was compared using the two-tailed Fisher exact test. The odds ratio for death at 30 days was estimated using multiple logistic regression.

RESULTS

During the study, 167 LT procedures were performed in 164 patients, of whom 51 (30.5%) were aged 60 years or older (age range, 60-70 years; mean [SD], 63.3 [2.4] years). Thirty-seven recipients aged 60 years or older underwent single LT, and 14 underwent bilateral LT. The 30-day survival was 81% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65%-92%) in patients who underwent single LT, and 92% (95% CI, 64%-100%) in patients who underwent bilateral LT. No differences were observed in the survival probability between the two groups (P = .42). Logistic regression analysis for death at 30 days showed an odds ratio of 1.10 (95% CI, 0.08-14.5; P = .94) in the unilateral LT group.

CONCLUSIONS

Early survival in LT recipients aged 60 years or older who underwent bilateral LT was comparable with that in who underwent single LT. The type of procedure is not a predictor of death in this age group. Recipients older than 60 years should not be excluded from consideration for bilateral LT.

An overview of lung transplantation in Korea

OBJECTIVE

Lung transplantation (LTx) is the only option for end-stage lung disease refractory to medical treatment. The program was slow to start in Korea; the first LTx was performed in July 1996. By October 2007, 25 lung and 7 heart-lung transplantations have been performed at 5 institutes, with the majority being performed at one center. The aim of this study was to improve the survival rate following LTx by analyzing the operative procedure and its complications.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of the medical records of 18 patients who underwent lung and heart-lung transplantations from July 1996 to October 2007 at a single institute. Operative mortality was excluded from the analysis of early and late complications.

RESULTS

There were 12 males and 6 females of mean age 46.2 +/- 11.5 years (range, 25-63 years). The indications for transplantation included pulmonary emphysema (n = 6), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (n = 3), lymphangioleiomyomatosis (n = 3), Eisenmenger's syndrome (n = 2), bronchiectasis (n = 2), primary pulmonary hypertension (n = 1), and primary graft dysfunction after a single lung transplantation (SLT; n = 1). Operations consisted of SLTs in 9 patients, bilateral sequential single lung transplantations (BSSLTs) in 8 patients, and a heart-lung transplantation (HLT) in 1 patient. Early complications were bleeding necessitating rethoracotomy, severe reperfusion injury, seizure, prolonged airleak, chylothorax, and pulmonary artery stenosis. Late complications consisted of cytomegalovirus infection, pulmonary tuberculosis, posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disease, gastric ulcer perforation, pneumothorax, chylothorax, empyema, and aspergillosis. There were 5 operative deaths due to intraoperative bleeding (n = 1), acute graft dysfunction (n = 2), and multiorgan failure (n = 2). Excluding the operative mortality, the mean survival period was 18.5 +/- 23.7 months (range, 3-87 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical experience in recent years may have reduced complication rates and led to prolonged survival. Increasing the candidate list through better results and raising awareness of the LTx program is necessary to move forward with thoracic transplantation in Korea.

Impact of bilateral versus single lung transplantation on survival in recipients 60 years of age and older: Analysis of United Network for Organ Sharing database

OBJECTIVE

Lung transplantation has been increasingly applied to patients over the age of 60 years. Importantly, the procedure of choice, single versus bilateral lung transplantation, remains unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine short- and midterm outcomes in this age group with particular attention to procedure type.

METHODS

All first lung transplant recipients, 60 years of age or older, reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing from 1998 to 2004 were divided into two groups: bilateral and single lung transplantation. A retrospective review of pertinent baseline characteristics, clinical parameters, and outcomes was performed. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate and Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to compare posttransplant survival between these groups. Additionally, propensity scores analysis was performed.

RESULTS

During the study period, 1656 lung transplant recipients were 60 years of age or older (mean 62.7 +/- 2.4 years, median 62 years). Of these, 364 (28%) had bilateral and 1292 (78%) had single lung transplantation. Survival was not statistically different between the two groups. In the multivariate analysis, bilateral versus single lung transplantation was not a predictor of mortality. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and a donor tobacco history of more than 20 pack-years were significantly associated with mortality (P = .003, CI 1.12-1.76; and P = .006, CI 1.09-1.63; respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The survival of lung transplant recipients 60 years of age or older who underwent bilateral versus single lung transplantation is comparable. These data suggest that type of procedure is not a predictor of mortality in this age group. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and donor cigarette use of more than 20 pack-years were independently associated with mortality.

Lung Transplantation: Current Status and Challenges

The lung is an anatomically complex vital organ whose normal physiology depends on actively regulated ventilation and perfusion, and maintenance of a delicate blood-air barrier over a huge surface area in direct contact with a potentially hostile environment. Despite significant progress over the past 25 years, both short- and long-term outcomes remain significantly inferior for lung recipients relative to other "solid" organs. This review summarizes the current status of lung transplantation so as to frame the principle challenges currently facing end-stage lung-failure patients and the practitioners who care for them.

Successful bilateral lung transplant outcomes in recipients 61 years of age and older

BACKGROUND

Controversy exists regarding the optimal use of bilateral lung transplant (BLT) in older recipients in diseases where either single or bilateral transplant is appropriate. International Society for Heart and Lung Transplant (ISHLT) guidelines suggest an upper age limit of 60 for BLT, despite limited data regarding outcomes with BLT in patients over 60. We hypothesize that BLT offers comparable, if not superior, clinical outcomes to SLT in all patients independent of recipient age.

METHODS

In order to test our hypothesis, we conducted a case-control study to compare the effect of transplant operation on survival and the onset of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) in consecutive lung transplant recipients 61 years of age or older using Kaplan- Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

We identified 107 consecutive lung transplant recipients 61 or older at the time of transplant. Patients received SLT (n=46) or BLT (n=61) based on donor organ availability. Comparable survival was achieved with BLT in older patients vs. SLT P=0.19). One-, two-, and five-year survival estimates in BLT were 82%, 75% and 68%, respectively, vs. in SLT 78%, 70% and 44%, respectively. A comparable onset of BOS was also observed in the patients who received BLT vs. SLT (P=0.23).

CONCLUSION

Successful short- and medium-term outcomes are achieved with BLT in older recipients and are comparable to those achieved with SLT. Our results suggest that age over 60 should not exclude patients from consideration of BLT.

Health-related Quality-of-Life Determinants in Lung Transplantation

BACKGROUND

In light of recent reviews, we examined the effect of individual and clinical factors, associated with lung transplantation (LTx), on health-related quality of life (HRQL).

METHODS

HRQL was measured cross-sectionally on 34 candidates and 71 lung transplant recipients, using the Short Form 36-item questionnaire (SF-36), of the Medical Outcomes Study. Multivariate analysis was used to model each of the 8 SF-36 health domains as a function of individual determinants associated with LTx. The original model included: transplant status; age; gender; time since LTx; forced expiratory volume in 1 second (% predicted); type of LTx received; lung disease; whether within 1 month of the interview the participant was hospitalized; days in hospital (LOS); and whether infection or rejection occurred. Final models were chosen using a statistical cutoff of alpha < or = 0.10 to remain in the model.

RESULTS

After adjusting for important predictors, lung transplantation was positively associated with all domains (p < 0.005). Although time since transplantation negatively influenced the physical- and social-related domains (p < 0.05), the effect was small. Clinically meaningful effects on physical HRQL domains were observed with disease (p < 0.01), type of transplant received (p < 0.05) and hospital stay (p < 0.05). Gender played a role in mental health (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical events leading to hospitalization limit some HRQL domains. Different factors influence the physical, social and mental health domains, and thus future studies should focus on domain-specific variables to optimize HRQL. The HRQL benefit conferred from LTx renders it a worthwhile option for end-stage lung disease patients with important physical limitations.