Evolution of Proteinuria After Conversion From Calcineurin Inhibitors (CNI) to Sirolimus (SRL) in Renal Transplant Patients: A Multicenter Study

Long-Term Effects of the Replacement of Calcineurin Inhibitors With Everolimus and Mycophenolate in Patients With Calcineurin Inhibitor-Related Nephrotoxicity

BACKGROUND

There is little evidence on the long-term effects of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal and substitution with everolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in maintenance therapy of patients who have received heart transplants and have concurrent CNI nephrotoxicity. Aims of this study were to evaluate the progression of renal dysfunction after discontinuation of CNIs and to monitor for major adverse events after therapy change.

METHODS

Data from 41 patients who underwent heart transplant and have different degrees of renal dysfunction (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <60 mL/min/1.73 m²), without evidence of proteinuria, and in whom CNI therapy was replaced by everolimus, were analyzed. At the time of CNI withdrawal, clinical parameters, echocardiographic data, blood tests of renal function, and monitoring of adverse events were recorded. The median follow-up period was 5 years ± 28 months.

RESULTS

In 52% of patients, there was a clear improvement in renal function (10.5 mL/min/1.73 m² of extra eGFR on average). The former were characterized by less advanced age and a short time from the heart transplant. The echocardiographic parameters showed a significant reduction in septum thickness (11.58 ± 2 mm vs 10.29 ± 2 mm; P = .0001) and in left ventricle posterior wall thickness (10.74 ± 1 mm vs 9.74 ± 1 mm; P = .0004). The incidence of late acute rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy was similar in our population compared to literature data.

CONCLUSIONS

A therapeutic switch from CNIs to everolimus and mycophenolate mofetil can improve renal function in patients with CNI nephrotoxicity, especially in those with a shorter time period from transplantation, without exposing them to a higher incidence of late acute rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy.

Recommendations of everolimus use in liver transplant

Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, everolimus (EVL) and sirolimus are immunosuppressive agents with a minor nephrotoxic effect, limited to the development of proteinuria in some cases. The combination of EVL and low-dose tacrolimus has proven to be as safe and effective as standard therapy with tacrolimus for the prevention of acute cellular rejection. Early initiation of EVL-based immunosuppressive regimens with reduced exposure to calcineurin inhibitors has been shown to significantly improve renal function of LT recipients during induction and maintenance phases, with comparable efficacy and safety profiles. In patients with established kidney failure, initiating EVL may enable clinicians to reduce calcineurin inhibitors exposure, thereby contributing to the improved renal function of these patients. Although there is not sufficient evidence to recommend their use to prevent the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma and the progression of de novo tumours, they are used in this context in routine clinical practice.

Time-Dependent and Immunosuppressive Drug-Associated Adverse Event Profiles in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients Converted from Tacrolimus to Sirolimus Regimens

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and tolerability of immunosuppressive drugs used in a planned randomized conversion from a calcineurin inhibitor, tacrolimus, to a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, sirolimus, in de novo kidney transplant recipients.

DESIGN

Prospective safety analysis of data from a prospective, randomized, open-label, controlled study.

PATIENTS

A total of 119 adult kidney transplant recipients who received tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate sodium (MPS), and prednisone between February 2008 and May 2010; after 3 months of this regimen, 60 of these patients were randomized to conversion from TAC to sirolimus (SRL/MPS group), and 59 patients continued with the TAC regimen (TAC/MPS group).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Both groups were followed for 24 months after transplantation for immunosuppressive regimen-associated and time-dependent occurrences of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Before conversion from TAC to SRL, the cumulative incidence of AEs was 98%; 25% were SAEs. Gastrointestinal AEs (66%) and infections (58%) were the most frequent AEs. The incidences of TAC and MPS dose reductions due to AEs were 1.7% and 12%, respectively. After conversion, no significant differences were noted in the SRL/MPS group versus the TAC/MPS group in the cumulative incidences of AEs (100% vs. 98%) and SAEs (27% vs. 30%). The most common AEs were gastrointestinal (70% vs. 54%, p=0.23) and infection (77% vs. 73%, p=0.79) in the SRL/MPS versus TAC/MPS groups. The incidence of aphthous ulcer (28% vs. 0%, p=< 0.01), sinusitis (10% vs. 0%, p=0.01), dermatitis (15% vs. 3%, p=0.03), and dyslipidemia (35% vs. 14%, p=0.02) were higher in the SRL/MPS group compared with the TAC/MPS group. Cox proportion regression analysis showed a higher relative risk for gastrointestinal (hazard ratio [HR] 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-3.01, p<0.05) and skin and subcutaneous tissue (HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1-4.1, p<0.05) AEs in the SRL/MPS group compared with the TAC/MPS group. AE-related dose reductions occurred in 18.3% of patients receiving SRL and 3.3% of patients receiving TAC. MPS dose reductions due to AEs occurred in 11.7% of patients receiving SRL and 13.6% of patients receiving TAC.

CONCLUSION

SRL/MPS treatment was associated with a time-dependent higher incidence of gastrointestinal and skin and subcutaneous tissue AEs, which occurred mainly during the first 6 months after conversion from TAC/MPS. Although the treatments with SRL or TAC after 3 months of transplantation showed different safety profiles, both regimens demonstrated adequate tolerability, with low rates of early discontinuation related to AEs.

Everolimus as primary immunosuppression in kidney transplantation: experience in conversion from calcineurin inhibitors

BACKGROUND

We analyzed our clinical experience with everolimus (EVL) and identified prognostic factors for a successful conversion.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 220 kidney recipients consecutively converted to EVL with calcineurin inhibitor elimination. We studied risk factors for proteinuria at 1 year after conversion, decline in renal function, and graft survival.

RESULTS

Baseline creatinine clearance was 52.4±17.8 mL/min vs. 53.4±20.1 mL/min 1 year after conversion (P=0.150). Median proteinuria increased from 304 mg/day (interquartile range 160-507) to 458 mg/day (interquartile range 238-892; P<0.001). Risk factors for development of proteinuria ≥900 mg/day (P75) at 1-year postconversion were creatinine clearance less than 60 mL/min (odds ratio [OR] 3.37; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-9.89), serum triglycerides ≥150 mg/day (OR 4.35; 95% CI: 1.70-11.17), no treatment with prednisone (OR 3.04; 95% CI: 1.22-7.59), baseline proteinuria ≥550 mg/day (OR 10.37; 95% CI: 3.99-26.99), and conversion ≥3 years after transplant (OR 5.77; 95% CI: 1.89-17.59). An interaction was observed between baseline proteinuria and time to conversion: in patients with baseline proteinuria ≥550 mg/day, the risk of developing proteinuria ≥900 mg/day was 77.1% if they were converted after ≥3 years posttransplant. However, this risk was 29.8% in the subgroup converted before (P=0.02). Actuarial graft survival at 1 and 4 years postconversion was 98.2% and 86.5%, respectively. Baseline proteinuria ≥550 mg/day was a risk factor for graft loss in patients converted after the third year but not in patients converted before this time. EVL discontinuation rate was 24% in the first year postconversion.

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion to EVL and elimination of calcineurin inhibitors is safe. Success depends on not making late conversions and not converting patients with high baseline proteinuria.

Clinical recommendations for the use of everolimus in heart transplantation

Proliferation signal inhibitors (PSIs), everolimus (EVL), and sirolimus are a group of immunosuppressor agents indicated for the prevention of acute rejection in adult heart transplant recipients. Proliferation signal inhibitors have a mechanism of action with both immunosuppressive and antiproliferative effects, representing an especially interesting treatment option for the prevention and management of some specific conditions in heart transplant population, such as graft vasculopathy or malignancies. Proliferation signal inhibitors have been observed to work synergistically with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). Data from clinical trials and from the growing clinical experience show that when administered concomitantly with CNIs, PSIs allow significant dose reductions of the latter without loss of efficacy, a fact that has been associated with stabilization or significant improvement in renal function in patients with CNI-induced nephrotoxicity. The purpose of this article was to review the current knowledge of the role of PSIs in heart transplantation to provide recommendations for the proper use of EVL in cardiac transplant recipients, including indications, treatment regimens, monitoring, and management of the adverse events.

Loss of nephrin expression in glomeruli of kidney-transplanted patients under m-TOR inhibitor therapy

The development of proteinuria has been observed in kidney-transplanted patients on m-TOR inhibitor (m-TORi) treatment. Recent studies suggest that m-TORi(s) may alter the behavior and integrity of glomerular podocytes. We analyzed renal biopsies from kidney-transplanted patients and evaluated the expression of nephrin, a critical component of the glomerular slit-diaphragm. In a group of patients on 'de novo' m-TORi-treatment, the expression of nephrin within glomeruli was significantly reduced in all cases compared to pretransplant donor biopsies. Biopsies from control transplant patients not treated with m-TORi(s) failed to present a loss of nephrin. In a group of patients subsequently converted to m-TORi-treatment, a protocol biopsy performed before introduction of m-TORi was also available. The expression of nephrin in the pre-m-TORi biopsies was similar to that observed in the pretransplant donor biopsies but was significantly reduced after introduction of m-TORi(s). Proteinuria increased after the m-TORi inititiation in this group. However, in some cases proteinuria remained normal despite reduction of nephrin. In vitro, sirolimus downregulated nephrin expression by human podocytes. Our results suggest that m-TORi(s) may affect nephrin expression in kidney-transplanted patients, consistently with the observation in vitro on cultured podocytes.

Conversion to sirolimus for chronic allograft nephropathy and calcineurin inhibitor toxicity and the adverse effects of sirolimus after conversion

BACKGROUND

Chronic allograft nephropathy and calcineurin inhibitor toxicity may cause graft loss. After kidney transplantation, especially among those patients with chronic allograft nephropathy, sirolimus may be a good alternative to calcineurin inhibitors. Unlike calcineurin inhibitors, sirolimus is devoid of significant nephrotoxicity, but approximately 30% to 50% of patients on sirolimus therapy display mild or severe adverse effects. We sought to report our experience with sirolimus conversion among patients with chronic allograft nephropathy as well as the mild versus severe adverse effects that limit the drug's use.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed the outcomes of 88 patients (64 men and 24 women) of overall mean age of 35.9 +/- 9.9 years (range, 21-59 years) who had undergone kidney transplantation. Immunosuppressive therapy had been converted from a calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus because of biopsy-proven chronic allograft nephropathy, calcineurin inhibitor toxicity, or presence of malignancy. We excluded patients with prior acute rejection episodes. Subjects were divided into two groups with respect to their creatinine levels: Group A < 2 mg/dL and Group B >or= 2 mg/dL. After conversion to sirolimus, possible adverse effects of sirolimus were evaluated at the follow-up inset. Each patient underwent a physical examination, and estimation of serum lipid and electrolyte levels as well as hemoglobin concentration.

RESULTS

At the time of conversion of the 88 renal transplant patients, their mean duration after grafting was 48 +/- 15 months (range, 4-296). The prior treatment consisted of a calcineurin inhibitor, prednisolone, and mycophenolate mofetil. After conversion, the calcineurin inhibitor was stopped and sirolimus was begun. The 48 Group 2 patients (34 men, 14 women) of overall mean posttransplant time of 22.7 +/- 14.6 months who underwent conversion displayed a mean serum creatinine increase to 3.2 +/- 1.4 mg/dL, including 17 subjects who underwent rejection. The 40 Group 1 patients (30 men, 10 women) with a mean overall posttransplant period of 67.6 +/- 49.9 months showed an fall in serum creatinine level to 1.4 +/- 0.5 mg/dL among only 3 patients. While 5/88 patients showed no increase in proteinuria (5.6%); 83 (94.4%) did experience it. Proteinuria increased from a mean of 192 +/- 316 to 449 +/- 422 mg/d. Only three patients displayed heavy proteinuria (>3 g/d); sirolimus was discontinued for this reason. Proteinuria was well controlled in the other patients with angiotensin-converting enzyme and/or angiotensin II receptor inhibitor agents. After sirolimus conversion, serum cholesterol levels increased from 187 +/- 42 to 214 +/- 52 mg/dL, and serum triglyceride levels increased from 161 +/- 61 to 194 +/- 102 mg/dL. All but four patients responded to statin therapy, with serum lipid levels falling to acceptable levels. Another four patients developed unilateral lower extremity edema with sirolimus discontinued for this reason. One patient displayed generalized arthralgia.

CONCLUSION

Chronic allograft nephropathy or calcineurin inhibitor toxicity can lead to loss of graft kidney function. Calcineurin inhibitor toxicity can lead to chronic allograft nephropathy. Patients with a low baseline serum creatinine level who undergo sirolimus conversion showed stabilized kidney function. Late conversion of patients with a serum creatinine above 2 mg/dL face a risk of graft failure. Sirolimus displayed a limited incidence of serious adverse effects; mild or moderate adverse effects, such as hyperlipidemia and proteinuria, were easily controlled with countermeasure therapy.

Conversion to everolimus in kidney transplant recipients with decreased renal function

Whenever graft function is good and proteinuria is under control, many reports describe the efficacy and safety of the conversion to Everolimus (EVL) among stable kidney recepients, simultaneously withdrawing the calcineurin inhibitor (CNI). However, there are few publications that evaluate the role of EVL in patients with decreased renal function. We describe our experience with 22 stable renal transplant recipients whose serum creatinine concentrations were >2 mg/dL and proteinuria <1000 mg/24 h who underwent an abrupt switch from a CNI to EVL. Conversion was simple, well-tolerated, and safe using an initial dose of 1-3 mg/d that was sufficient to achieve the recommended levels of 3-8 ng/dL. The adverse events were expected; most of them were of medium intensity. Globally, over the 24 months follow-up, there was improved renal function despite the initial creatinine. The improvement was greater when the switch was performed during the first year after transplantation. Two patients lost their grafts after a dramatic evolution with development of nephrotic syndrome and increasing creatinine. In our experience, conversion to EVL is a safe alternative among patients with chronic allograft nephropathy or nephrotoxicity due to CNI, even in patients with significantly decreased renal function at the time of the switch.

Patient selection critical for calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal in pediatric kidney transplantation

CNI withdrawal may be employed as a "rescue" strategy for patients with established renal allograft injury and/or declining allograft function, with the aim at eliminating CNI-associated nephrotoxic effects. This analysis reviews outcomes in a pediatric population and identifies risk factors for adverse events post-CNI withdrawal. We performed a retrospective analysis of 17 pediatric renal transplants who underwent CNI withdrawal, with conversion to sirolimus and MMF. Mean CrCl decreased from 64.3 +/- 22 to 59.38 +/- 28.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (p = 0.04) at six months and 57.46 +/- 31.1 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (p = 0.02) at 12 months post-withdrawal. Forty-one percent of patients experienced AR. Increased risk for AR was associated with prior AR history, lower sirolimus trough levels, and lower CNIT biopsy scores. Graft loss (24%) was associated with worse CrCl, proteinuria, and histologic chronicity. Proteinuria (spot protein/creatinine ratio) increased from 0.75 +/- 1.0 to 1.71 +/- 2.0 (p = 0.03), unrelated to de novo sirolimus use. Four patients returned to CNI-based immunosuppression due to AR (n = 3) and gastrointestinal side effects (n = 1). Careful selection of pediatric candidates for CNI withdrawal is recommended. Worsening graft function and graft loss may be minimized by selecting patients with high CNIT scores and low biopsy chronicity and excluding patients with prior AR history.

Multidisciplinary insights on clinical guidance for the use of proliferation signal inhibitors in heart transplantation

Proliferation signal or mammalian target-of-rapamycin inhibitors (PSI/mTOR inhibitors), everolimus and sirolimus, provide attractive options for use in heart transplantation because they are immunosuppressive and anti-proliferative. PSI/mTOR inhibitors work synergistically with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) and thus permit the minimization of CNIs without compromising efficacy. This approach is advantageous for the majority of heart transplant recipients and might provide particular benefit in specific cases, such as patients with cardiac allograft vasculopathy, malignancies and renal dysfunction, or in patients intolerant to other immunosuppressive agents. Drawing on the expertise of transplant cardiologists, cardiac surgeons and nephrologists, we addressed the assessment of renal function; management of adverse events associated with this class of drugs; and clinical guidance, specifically for the use of everolimus, including patient selection, indications for treatment and practicalities of drug initiation and monitoring.

Replacement of Calcineurin-Inhibitors With Sirolimus as Primary Immunosuppression in Stable Cardiac Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after cardiac transplantation. The aim of this study was to assess over 2 years the safety and effect on renal function of withdrawal of CNI immunosuppression and replacement with sirolimus (SRL) in stable cardiac transplant recipients.

METHODS

CNI was substituted with SRL in 78 cardiac transplant recipients (SRL group) of whom 58 (group A) had CNI-induced renal impairment (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] <50 mL/min) and 20 (group B) had preserved renal function (GFR >50 mL/min). Fifty-one patients (CNI group) with renal impairment (GFR < or =50 mL/min) maintained on CNI served as controls. Secondary immunosuppressants were unchanged.

RESULTS

In the SRL group, GFR increased from 47.0+/-18.0 to 61.2+/-22.2 ml/min (P=0.0001) 24 months after SRL initiation. In Group A, GFR increased from 40.5+/-12.7 to 53.9+/-19.8 mL/min (P<0.0001). In Group B, GFR increased marginally from 67.2+/-15.8 to 83.5+/-27.8 mL/min (P=0.10). In the CNI group, GFR declined from 40.5+/-14.0 mL/min to 36.4+/-12.5 mL/min (P=0.23) after 24 months of follow up. There was no significant difference in cardiac rejection or cardiac allograft function. In SRL group, proteinuria increased from 299+/-622 mg/day to 517+/-795 mg/day (P=0.0002) 12 months after SRL initiation and then stabilized; it did not differ from CNI group at 24 months (637+/-806 vs. 514+/-744 mg/day, P=0.39). Uric acid decreased from 7.6+/-2.4 to 6.2+/-1.9 mg/dL (P=0.0007) in the SRL group.

CONCLUSIONS

Graduated substitution of CNI with SRL in cardiac transplant recipients is safe and improves renal function, without cardiac compromise.

Effects of sirolimus vs. calcineurin inhibitors on renal dysfunction after orthotopic liver transplantation

Small uncontrolled series have suggested that sirolimus favorably impacts renal function after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). We sought to retrospectively compare renal dysfunction between cohorts exposed to sirolimus-based and calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppression. We retrospectively studied 79 patients converted to sirolimus-based immunosuppression and 100 control subjects continued on calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppression after OLT at our institution from 2000 to 2005. We collected clinical, demographic, and medication history. Renal dysfunction was defined as two or more wk of creatinine > or =2.0 mg/dL. Cohorts were compared using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling. Patients began sirolimus a median 83 d post-OLT and were followed on the medication for median 359 d. Patients in both the sirolimus and calcineurin inhibitor cohorts had median creatinine 1.2 mg/dL at study entry. Sirolimus-based immunosuppression was associated with a 1.8 (0.8-4.3, p = 0.17) hazards ratio for renal dysfunction. Adjusting for presence of hepatocellular carcinoma, combined kidney/liver transplantation, and age, the hazards ratio was 2.0 (0.8-4.8, p = 0.13). These point estimates were not substantially altered after subgroup analysis of sirolimus as the lone immunosuppressant, duration of exposure, and time between OLT and sirolimus conversion. In conclusion, our retrospective, controlled study showed that conversion to sirolimus after OLT did not protect against renal dysfunction. The effect of sirolimus on renal function will need to be prospectively evaluated in a prospective, randomized trial.

Sirolimus is not always responsible for new-onset proteinuria after conversion for chronic allograft nephropathy

An eight-yr-old combined liver and kidney transplant recipient for hyperoxaluria type I developed significant proteinuria and hypertension after conversion of a Tacrolimus, MMF, and corticosteroids-based immunosuppression to Sirolimus, low-dose Tacrolimus, and corticosteroids six and a half yr after the transplant for chronic allograft nephropathy. There was only one class I HLA match and the recipient had multiple blood exposures prior to transplantation. The patient was treated with combined hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis while awaiting transplantation to reduce the oxalate load. A renal biopsy revealed a de novo transplant glomerulopathy that was associated with specific HLA antibodies unrelated to the donor (HLA DR 17 and 18). After reintroduction of MMF, these antibodies became undetectable and the proteinuria completely resolved. We hypothesize that HLA antibodies may cause transplant glomerulopathy even if they are not donor-specific. Their production appears more susceptible to MMF therapy. A thorough work-up of new-onset proteinuria after conversion to Sirolimus should be performed, including an immunological work-up and a renal biopsy.

The role and value of sirolimus administration in kidney and liver transplantation

Enormous advancements in visceral transplantation have led to significant improvements in the quality of life of patients. However, despite these developments, the average graft half-life after transplantation has remained almost unchanged and chronic rejection is still considered a major problem. In this regard, more concerns have shifted to factors influencing long-term graft survival, patient survival, and quality of life. To achieve this goal, detrimental effects of immunosuppressive (IS) agents, which have deleterious influence on the quality of life and/or patient survival, should be reduced. In the course of recent years, the transplant community has worked on reducing these side effects by developing new ISs, employing new combination regimens, or finding and adjusting optimal dosages and blood level concentrations. Among the IS agents, the antifungal, antitumoral and IS activity of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors without nephrotoxicity, have received special attention regarding this new class of IS. Sirolimus (SRL), as the first member of mTOR inhibitors, has been utilized in many clinical trials with respect to its benefit-risk assessment. In our review, the clinical evolution of SRL, as well as the evidence-based clinical benefits of SRL in kidney and liver transplantation (KTx, LTx), are summarized. Various studies of SRL in KTx and LTx have shown that combination therapy with SRL will enrich the variety of IS modalities. It also can be regarded as a safe base therapy to which other necessary drugs can be added. In addition to the enhanced acute rejection prophylaxis, and in contrast to the calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) and steroids, this drug solely does not have common side effects such as nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Moreover, this agent might diminish vasculopathic processes that mediate chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). Therefore, by reducing the likelihood of CAN it can decrease the rate of long-term organ failure. One possibly desirable characteristic of SRL is its antiproliferative effect, which could provoke antitumoral or antiatherogenic activity following transplantation. Despite all promising impacts of SRL in organ transplantation, there are some concerns regarding the adverse effects of this drug, for instance dyslipidemia, pneumonitis and wound healing problems. However, the majority of these side effects can be reduced or ceased by careful dose adjustments and correct timing of use. In conclusion, after a decade of both in vivo and in vitro studies on SRL, it can be advocated that SRL is a promising, potent and effective IS agent as it reduces the rate of acute rejection episodes in de novo transplants. It could improve the quality of life, graft and patient survival rate, and achieve excellent outcomes with few adverse effects when wisely used in combination with other immunosuppressants.

Proteinuria in Transplant Patients Associated With Sirolimus

Sirolimus (SRL) is a potent immunosuppressive drug used in organ transplantation for prophylaxis of acute allograft rejection. Conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to SRL has become an important alternative in patients with chronic allograft nephropathy. Recently, some reports have described the appearance of proteinuria after the use of SRL. The aim of the present study was to describe the incidence of proteinuria in transplant recipients receiving SRL in our transplant center. We studied 78 patients receiving SRL either de novo or after conversion. Eighteen transplant recipients (23.1%) developed proteinuria after SRL treatment. Proteinuria was diagnosed at 11.2 +/- 2.1 months after the initiation of SRL; in eight patients (44.4%) it occurred in the first 6 months. The mean value of proteinuria was 2.6 +/- 0.6 g/24 hours. In 5 patients (27.8%), proteinuria reached nephrotic levels, and in 13 patients (72.2%) was associated with edema. Renal allograft biopsies were performed before conversion to SRL, and a new biopsy, after the appearance of proteinuria. The light microscopy of biopsies performed after the onset of proteinuria showed no specific glomerular changes, except in 2 cases wherein the diagnosis was focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Immunofluorescence was negative in all cases. In conclusion, in this study proteinuria was observed in 21.3% of patients receiving SRL therapy either as de novo protocol or after conversion to SRL. Proteinuria occurred early after the initiation of SRL therapy and in these cases, withdrawal of SRL was associated with reversion of proteinuria.

Conversion to everolimus in kidney transplant recipients: a safe and simple procedure

To date there is a substantial experience with rapamycin conversion in stable renal transplant recipients with respect to the procedure of conversion, initial doses, and target blood levels as well as adverse events, but in the case of Everolimus there is almost no experience with conversion and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal. We describe an initial experience among 32 renal transplant recipients who were converted to Everolimus with complete suspension of CNI in two Spanish transplant centers. Our results emphasised the procedure for conversion, the target levels, the adverse events, and the initial efficacy, over the first month after conversion. Our conclusions were that conversion from CNI to Everolimus was a simple, safe procedure with a predictable profile of adverse events, which were, in general, of mild intensity. There was a good correlation between initial dose and blood level. Initial doses of about 3 mg/d combined with rapid reduction in CNI exposure seemed to be adequate. The target range levels between 5 and 10 ng/mL seemed to be sufficient for complete CNI elimination, especially in patients also receiving antiproliferative drugs (such as mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine) in whom levels near the lower end of the range might be adequate.

Sirolimus attenuates the rate of progression of early chronic allograft nephropathy

Optimal treatment for patients with chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is not known. Early intervention is preferred. We examined the benefit of adding sirolimus (SRL; C(0) 5-12 ng/mL: HPLC) on the rate of progression of early CAN. We identified patients with biopsy-confirmed Banff grade 1 CAN. After biopsy, patients were switched to SRL + CsA + prednisolone (SRL), MMF + CsA + prednisolone (MMF), or CsA + AZA + prednisolone (AZA). GFR was estimated by Cockcroft-Gault and MDRD formulae. The rate of GFR decline (delta GFR) was determined by calculating the slope of the regression line of estimated GFR (MDRD and Cockcroft-Gault method) at different times. Statistical analysis was performed by the Wilcoxon test. The 41 patients with CAN grade 1 were assigned to SRL: MMF: AZA = 12: 20: 9. Before biopsy; the graft age for SRL: MMF: AZA were 56 +/- 27: 70 +/- 48: 51 +/- 36 months; and the GFR (MDRD method), 38 +/- 8: 42 +/- 15: 36 +/- 14 mL/min; GFR (C-G method) 45 +/- 13, 42 +/- 12, 41 +/- 15 mL/min; trough CsA levels 152 +/- 36: 145 +/- 46: 177 +/- 61 ng/dL; delta GFR (MDRD method) -0.18 +/- 0.20: -0.15 +/- 0.59: -0.20 +/- 1.08; delta GFR (C-G method) -0.13 +/- 0.37: -0.19 +/- 0.24: -0.65 +/- 0.99. Follow-up time for SRL: MMF: AZA was 19 +/- 4: 35 +/- 32: 59 +/- 54 months. At last follow-up; GFR (MDRD method) for SRL: MMF: AZA were 39 +/- 13: 35 +/- 21: 40 +/- 24 mL/min; GFR (C-G method) 46 +/- 17, 37 +/- 18, 46 +/- 25 mL/min; BP 128 +/- 11/79 +/- 7: 131 +/- 22/80 +/- 14: 132 +/- 20/82 +/- 11 mm Hg; and CsA level 52 +/- 25: 122 +/- 41: 155 +/- 49. After biopsy, statin was prescribed in nine SRL, 10 MMF, and three AZA. ACEI was prescribed in two SRL, three MMF, and two AZA. Compared with the prebiopsy values, the delta GFR (MDRD method) changed to -0.04 +/- 0.31 (SRL; P = .04), -0.17 +/- 0.40 (MMF; P = .60), and -0.97 +/- 1.52 (AZA: P = .16). Delta GFR (C-G method) was also significantly improved in the SRL group (-0.02 +/- 0.47; P = .05) but not in the MMF (-0.13 +/- 0.51; P = .53) or AZA (-0.54 +/- 1.78; P = .44). We concluded that patients with early CAN who are switched to SRL and low-dose CsA have a significant attenuation of the rate of GFR declination when compared with patients who receive MMF or AZA addition.

Proteinuria After Conversion to Sirolimus in Renal Transplant Recipients

Sirolimus (SRL) is a new, potent immunosuppressive agent. More recently, proteinuria has been reported as a consequence of sirolimus therapy, although the mechanism has remained unclear. We retrospectively examined the records of 25 renal transplant patients, who developed or displayed increased proteinuria after SRL conversion. The patient cohort (14 men, 11 women) was treated with SRL as conversion therapy, due to chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) (n = 15) neoplasia (n = 8); Kaposi's sarcoma, Four skin cancers, One intestinal tumors, One renal cell carsinom) or BK virus nephropathy (n = 2). SRL was started at a mean of 78 +/- 42 (15 to 163) months after transplantation. Mean follow-up on SRL therapy was 20 +/- 12 (6 to 43) months. Proteinuria increased from 0.445 (0 to 1.5) g/d before conversion to 3.2 g/dL (0.2 to 12) after conversion (P = 0.001). Before conversion 8 (32%) patients had no proteinuria, whereas afterwards all patients had proteinuria. In 28% of patients proteinuria remained unchanged, whereas it increased in 68% of patients. In 40% it increased by more than 100%. Twenty-eight percent of patients showed increased proteinuria to the nephrotic range. Biopsies performed in five patients revealed new pathological changes: One membranoproliferative glomerulopathy and interstitial nephritis. These patients showed persistently good graft function. Serum creatinine values did not change significantly: 1.98 +/- 0.8 mg/dL before SRL therapy and 2.53 +/- 1.9 mg/dL at last follow-up (P = .14). Five grafts were lost and the patients returned to dialysis. Five patients displayed CAN and Kaposi's sarcoma. Mean urinary protein of patients who returned to dialysis was 1.26 (0.5 to 3.5) g/d before and 4.7 (3 to 12) g/d after conversion (P = .01). Mean serum creatinine level before conversion was 2.21 mg/dL and thereafter, 4.93 mg/dL (P = .02). Heavy proteinuria was common after the use of SRL as rescue therapy for renal transplantation. Therefore, conversion should be considered for patients who have not developed advanced CAN and proteinuria. The possibility of de novo glomerular pathology under SRL treatment requires further investigation by renal biopsy.

Proteinuria following conversion from azathioprine to sirolimus in renal transplant recipients

Recent studies have reported a significant increase of proteinuria in kidney transplant recipients who were switched from a calcineurin inhibitor (CI) to sirolimus. This has (partly) been ascribed to the hemodynamic renal effects of CI withdrawal. We have evaluated the evolution of proteinuria in renal transplant recipients who underwent conversion from azathioprine to sirolimus. In a randomized, prospective, multicenter study called RESCUE (Recurrent cutanEous Squamous cell Carcinoma Under RapamunE) the efficacy and safety is investigated of conversion to sirolimus in stable renal transplant recipients with a cutaneus squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). In our center 25 patients have been included in this study of which 13 patients were randomized to continue their current immunosuppressive treatment and 12 to conversion to sirolimus. After a mean follow-up of 360 days mean proteinuria increased from 0.37+/-0.34 to 1.81+/-1.73 g/24 h after conversion to sirolimus (P<0.005). In the control group there was no change in proteinuria. A significant increase of proteinuria was observed in all seven patients with proteinuria before conversion, whereas proteinuria remained absent in all patients without previous proteinuria. Two of the patients with proteinuria were converted from cyclosporine and five were converted from azathioprine to sirolimus. Sirolimus was discontinued in five patients with proteinuria, and in all of them proteinuria declined to baseline values. Our study demonstrates that conversion from azathioprine to sirolimus after kidney transplantation may cause a reversible increase of proteinuria. Sirolimus-induced proteinuria therefore cannot be ascribed to the hemodynamic renal effects of withdrawal of CI.

Sirolimus-Associated Proteinuria and Renal Dysfunction

Sirolimus is a novel immunosuppressant with potent antiproliferative actions through its ability to inhibit the raptor-containing mammalian target of rapamycin protein kinase. Sirolimus represents a major therapeutic advance in the prevention of acute renal allograft rejection and chronic allograft nephropathy. Its role in the therapy of glomerulonephritis, autoimmunity, cystic renal diseases and renal cancer is under investigation. Because sirolimus does not share the vasomotor renal adverse effects exhibited by calcineurin inhibitors, it has been designated a 'non-nephrotoxic drug'. However, clinical reports suggest that, under some circumstances, sirolimus is associated with proteinuria and acute renal dysfunction. A common risk factor appears to be presence of pre-existing chronic renal damage. The mechanisms of sirolimus-associated proteinuria are multifactorial and may be due to an increase in glomerular capillary pressure following calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal. It has also been suggested that sirolimus directly causes increased glomerular permeability/injury, but evidence for this mechanism is currently inconclusive. The acute renal dysfunction associated with sirolimus (such as in delayed graft function) may be due to suppression of compensatory renal cell proliferation and survival/repair processes. Although these adverse effects occur in some patients, their occurrence could be minimised by knowledge of the molecular effects of sirolimus on the kidney, the use of sirolimus in appropriate patient populations, close monitoring of proteinuria and renal function, use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers if proteinuria occurs and withdrawal if needed. Further long-term analysis of renal allograft studies using sirolimus as de novo immunosuppression along with clinical and laboratory studies will refine these issues in the future.

Conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus in chronic allograft dysfunction: changes in glomerular haemodynamics and proteinuria

BACKGROUND

The study was conducted in order to describe possible intraglomerular haemodynamic changes inducing proteinuria after 14 patients with chronic allograft dysfunction were converted from calcineurin inhibitors (CIs) to sirolimus without changing concomitant immunosuppression or antihypertensive treatment.

METHODS

Creatinine, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), proteinuria, renal functional reserve (RFR) and effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) were determined before and 8 months after conversion. Intraglomerular pressure (P(G)), afferent arteriolar resistance (AAR) and efferent arteriolar resistance (EAR) were calculated using Gomez's formula.

RESULTS

Creatinine (1.97 vs 2.075 mg/dl; P = 0.270) and GFR (40 vs 43 ml/min; P = 0.505) remained unchanged, proteinuria increased (338 vs 1146 mg/24 h; P = 0.006), RFR decreased (34.84 vs 13.47%; P = 0.019), ERPF (248 vs 310.6 ml/min; P = 0.0625) and P(G) (42.72 vs 46.17 mmHg; P = 0.0625) tendentially increased and AAR tendentially decreased (14.12 vs 10.28 dyne/s/cm(5); P = 0.0625).

CONCLUSION

After conversion, P(G) shows a tendency to increase and RFR decreases significantly-characteristics of hyperfiltration, which could possibly partially explain the increase of proteinuria. Therefore, the application of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers seems promising. To avoid hyperfiltration, conversion should be performed early when renal insufficiency is still moderate.