Acute rejection after liver transplantation: Is there a specific immunological pattern?

Immune monitoring after pediatric liver transplantation - the prospective ChilSFree cohort study

Background

Although trough levels of immunosuppressive drugs are largely used to monitor immunosuppressive therapy after solid organ transplantation, there is still no established tool that allows for a validated assessment of functional degree of immunosuppression or the identification of clinically relevant over- or under-immunosuppression, depending on graft homeostasis. Reliable non-invasive markers to predict biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) do not exist. Literature data suggest that longitudinal measurements of immune markers might be predictive of BPAR, but data in children are scarce. We therefore propose an observational prospective cohort study focusing on immune monitoring in children after liver transplantation. We aim to describe immune function in a cohort of children before and during the first year after liver transplantation and plan to investigate how the immune function profile is associated with clinical and laboratory findings.

Methods

In an international multicenter prospective approach, children with end-stage liver disease who undergo liver transplantation are enrolled to the study and receive extensive immune monitoring before and at 1, 2, 3, 4 weeks and 3, 6, 12 months after transplantation, and whenever a clinically indicated liver biopsy is scheduled. Blood samples are analyzed for immune cell numbers and circulating levels of cytokines, chemokines and factors of angiogenesis reflecting immune cell activation. Statistical analysis will focus on the identification of trajectorial patterns of immune reactivity predictive for systemic non-inflammatory states, infectious complications or BPAR using joint modelling approaches.

Discussion

The ChilSFree study will help to understand the immune response after pLTx in different states of infection or rejection. It may provide insight into response mechanisms eventually facilitating immune tolerance towards the graft. Our analysis may yield an applicable immune panel for non-invasive early detection of acute cellular rejection, with the prospect of individually tailoring immunosuppressive therapy. The international collaborative set-up of this study allows for an appropriate sample size which is otherwise difficult to achieve in the field of pediatric liver transplantation.

Monitoring alloimmune response in kidney transplantation

Currently, immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplant recipients is generally performed by protocols and adjusted according to functional or histological evaluation of the allograft and/or signs of drug toxicity or infection. As a result, a large fraction of patients are likely to receive too much or too little immunosuppression, exposing them to higher rates of infection, malignancy and drug toxicity, or increased risk of acute and chronic graft injury from rejection, respectively. Developing reliable biomarkers is crucial for individualizing therapy aimed at extending allograft survival. Emerging data indicate that many assays, likely used in panels rather than single assays, have potential to be diagnostic and predictive of short and also long-term outcome. While numerous cross-sectional studies have found associations between the results of these assays and the presence of clinically relevant post-transplantation outcomes, data from prospective studies are still scanty, thereby preventing widespread implementation in the clinic. Of note, some prospective, randomized, multicenter biomarker-driven studies are currently on-going aiming at confirming such preliminary data. These works as well as other future studies are highly warranted to test the hypothesis that tailoring immunosuppression on the basis of results offered by these biomarkers leads to better outcomes than current standard clinical practice.

Clinical factors affecting rejection rates in liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

With improvements in survival, liver transplant recipients now suffer more morbidity from long-term immunosuppression. Considerations were given to develop individualized immunosuppression based on their risk of rejection.

METHOD

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 788 liver transplants performed during the period from October 1991 to December 2011 to study the relationship between acute cellular rejection (ACR) and various clinical factors.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis showed that older age (P=0.04, OR=0.982), chronic hepatitis B virus infection (P=0.005, OR= 0.574), living donor liver transplantation (P=0.02, OR=0.648) and use of interleukin-2 receptor antagonist on induction (P<0.001, OR=0.401) were associated with fewer ACRs. Patients with fulminant liver failure (P=0.004, OR=4.05) were more likely to develop moderate to severe grade ACR.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver transplant recipients with older age, chronic hepatitis B virus infection, living donor liver transplantation and use of interleukin-2 receptor antagonist on induction have fewer ACR. Patients transplanted for fulminant liver failure are at higher risk of moderate to severe grade ACR. These results provide theoretical framework for developing individualized immunosuppression.

Monitoring T cell alloreactivity

Currently, immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplant recipients is center-specific, protocol-driven, and adjusted according to functional or histological evaluation of the allograft and/or signs of drug toxicity or infection. As a result, a large fraction of patients receive too much or too little immunosuppression, exposing them to higher rates of infection, malignancy and drug toxicity, or increased risk of acute and chronic graft injury from rejection, respectively. The individualization of immunosuppression requires the development of assays able to reliably quantify and/or predict the magnitude of the recipient's immune response toward the allograft. As alloreactive T cells are central mediators of allograft rejection, monitoring T cell alloreactivity has become a priority for the transplant community. Among available assays, flow cytometry based phenotyping, T cell proliferation, T cell cytokine secretion, and ATP release (ImmuKnow), have been the most thoroughly tested. While numerous cross-sectional studies have found associations between the results of these assays and the presence of clinically relevant post-transplantation outcomes, data from prospective studies are still scanty, thereby preventing widespread implementation in the clinic. Future studies are required to test the hypothesis that tailoring immunosuppression on the basis of results offered by these biomarkers leads to better outcomes than current standard clinical practice.

Effector mechanisms of rejection

Organ transplantation appears today to be the best alternative to replace the loss of vital organs induced by various diseases. Transplants can, however, also be rejected by the recipient. In this review, we provide an overview of the mechanisms and the cells/molecules involved in acute and chronic rejections. T cells and B cells mainly control the antigen-specific rejection and act either as effector, regulatory, or memory cells. On the other hand, nonspecific cells such as endothelial cells, NK cells, macrophages, or polymorphonuclear cells are also crucial actors of transplant rejection. Last, beyond cells, the high contribution of antibodies, chemokines, and complement molecules in graft rejection is discussed in this article. The understanding of the different components involved in graft rejection is essential as some of them are used in the clinic as biomarkers to detect and quantify the level of rejection.

Differing effects of rapamycin or calcineurin inhibitor on T-regulatory cells in pediatric liver and kidney transplant recipients

In a cross-sectional study, we assessed effects of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) or rapamycin on T-regulatory (Treg) cells from children with stable liver (n = 53) or kidney (n = 9) allografts several years posttransplant. We analyzed Treg number, phenotype, suppressive function, and methylation at the Treg-specific demethylation region (TSDR) using Tregs and peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Forty-eight patients received CNI (39 as monotherapy) and 12 patients received rapamycin (9 as monotherapy). Treg numbers diminished over time on either regimen, but reached significance only with CNI (r =-0.424, p = 0.017). CNI levels inversely correlated with Treg number (r =-0.371, p = 0.026), and positively correlated with CD127+ expression by Tregs (r = 0.437, p = 0.023). Patients with CNI levels >3.6 ng/mL had weaker Treg function than those with levels <3.6 ng/mL, whereas rapamycin therapy positively correlated with Treg numbers (r = 0.628, p = 0.029) and their expression of CTLA4 (r = 0.726, p = 0.041). Overall, CTLA4 expression, TSDR demethylation and an absence of CD127 were important for Treg suppressive function. We conclude that rapamycin has beneficial effects on Treg biology, whereas long-term and high dose CNI use may impair Treg number, function and phenotype, potentially acting as a barrier to attaining host hyporesponsiveness to an allograft.

Significance of alanine aminopeptidase N (APN) in bile in the diagnosis of acute cellular rejection after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Allograft dysfunction after liver transplantation requires histopathologic examination for confirmation of the diagnosis, however, the procedure is invasive and its interpretation is not always accurate. The aim of this study was to find novel protein markers in bile for the diagnosis of acute cellular rejection (ACR) after liver transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Quantitative proteomic analysis using the (18)O labeling method was used to search for bile proteins of interest. Nine recipients were selected who had liver dysfunction, diagnosed by liver biopsy, either with ACR (ACR group, n = 5) or without (LD group, n = 4). Donor bile samples were obtained from nine independent live liver donors. Enzyme activity in bile samples was assayed and liver biopsy specimens were immunostained for candidate protein of ACR.

RESULTS

The analysis identified 78 proteins, among which alanine aminopeptidase N (APN/CD13) was considered a candidate marker of ACR. Comparative analysis of the ACR and LD groups showed high APN enzyme activity in three (60%) of five cases of the ACR group, while it was as low as donor level in all patients of the LD group. APN enzyme activity in bile samples of liver dysfunction liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients of the ACR group collected within 3 d before biopsy-confirmed ACR (n = 10) was significantly higher (584 ± 434 U/g protein) than in those of recipients free of ACR (n = 96, 301 ± 271 U/g protein) (P = 0.004). APN overexpression along bile canaliculi was observed during ACR in all five cases of the ACR group.

CONCLUSION

APN in bile seems to be a useful and noninvasive biomarker of ACR after liver transplantation.

Advances in research on antibody-mediated rejection after liver transplantation

T cell- and antibody-mediated immunity are also called cellular and humoral immunity, respectively. Both cellular and humoral immunity are known to mediate the rejection after allogeneic/xenogeneic organ transplantation. Liver transplantation is the most common type of organ transplantation. At present, many studies have shown that antibody-mediated immunity plays an important role in the development of rejection after liver transplantation. In this article, we will review the recent advances in understanding the basic theory, mechanism, pathological diagnosis and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection after liver transplantation.

Using an immune functional assay to differentiate acute cellular rejection from recurrent hepatitis C in liver transplant patients

In transplant recipients transplanted for hepatitis C, presentation of abnormal transaminases can herald the presentation of recurrent hepatitis C, cellular rejection, or both. Given the sometimes ambiguous histology with these 2 entities, the ability to distinguish them is of great importance because misinterpretation can potentially affect graft survival. We used an immune functional assay to help assess the etiology of abnormal liver function test results in liver transplant recipients. Blood samples for the immune functional assay were taken from 42 recipients prospectively at various times post-transplant and compared with clinical and histologic findings. In patients whose liver biopsy showed evidence of cellular rejection, the immune response was noted to be very high, whereas in those with active recurrence of hepatitis C, the immune response was found to be very low. This finding was found to be statistically significant (P < 0.0001). In those patients in whom there was no predominant histologic features suggesting 1 entity over the other, the immune response was higher than in those with aggressive hepatitis C but lower than in those with cellular rejection. In conclusion, these data show the potential utility of the ImmuKnow assay as a means of distinguishing hepatitis C from cellular rejection and its potential usefulness as a marker for outlining the progression of hepatitis C.

Bronchoalveolar immunologic profile of acute human lung transplant allograft rejection

Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) offers a potential means to diagnose acute rejection and could provide insight into the immune mechanisms responsible for lung allograft rejection. Transbronchial biopsies from 29 bronchoscopic procedures were assessed for rejection. Concurrent BALF lymphocyte subsets were examined by flow cytometry, including CD4 and CD8 T cells and their activation status by CD38 expression, natural killer (NK), NK-like T (NT), B, regulatory T, and invariant receptor NK-T cells. Percentages of CD4 were reduced, and CD8 and activation of CD4 T cells correlated with rejection. There were trends for increased NT, reduced NK, and increased B cell percentages with rejection, suggesting potential roles of these cells. Among regulatory cells, the percentages of regulatory T cells decreased and CD4/CD8 invariant NK-T cells increased during rejection, suggesting a proinflammatory profile. A unique BALF lymphocyte profile was associated with rejection and may provide insight into the pathogenesis of allograft rejection.