Detection and monitoring of human herpesvirus 7 in adult liver transplant patients: impact on clinical course and association with cytomegalovirus

Co-infection and clinical impact of human herpesvirus 5 and 6 in liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Human herpesvirus (HHV) 5 and 6 remain latent after primary infection and can be reactivated after immunosuppression for organ transplantation. An association between HHV-5 and HHV-6 has been reported in liver transplant patients. The coinfection is associated with clinical manifestations and graft dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to monitor herpesviruses in liver transplant recipients to better understand issues involving coinfection with HHV-5/6 and correlations with acute cellular rejection episodes and bacterial infections.

METHODS

Forty-five adult liver transplant patients of median age 47 years (range, 18-66), gave blood samples and liver biopsies in the first 6 months after their surgeries. Viremia was detected with the use of nested PCR and antigenemia; the Banff classification was used to detect allograft rejection.

RESULTS

IgG positive for HHV-5 was observed in 94% of subjects whose main indication (67%) for transplantation was hepatitis C. Twenty-three (51.1%) displayed cytomeg virus (CMV) infections and 12 (26.7%) HHV-6 infection. There were 6 patients (13.3%) with HHV-5/6 coinfections. Eighteen of the 23 patients had CMV disease, showing a strong correlation between a positive test and CMV disease; 6 displayed an acute cellular rejection episode in the same period (χ(2) = 6.62; P < .03). Four out of 6 patients who displayed coinfections (HHV-5/6) had concomitant bacterial infections; 3/6 experienced graft rejection episodes. During follow-up, 1 patient had HHV-6 infection diagnosed as encephalitis followed by fever on the 24th day after surgery. The median 32 days for HHV-6 detection by nested PCR positivity was shorter than 38 days for HHV-5.

CONCLUSIONS

HHV-5/6-infected patients displayed more allograft rejection episodes, coinfections, and concomitant bacterial infections, besides an higher risk for CMV disease.

Viral factors influencing the outcome of human cytomegalovirus infection in liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains the leading viral cause of disease following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) despite the availability of antiviral agents for prophylaxis and therapy.

OBJECTIVE

Examine the viral factors that influence the outcome of CMV infection following valganciclovir prophylaxis or laboratory-guided preemptive therapy in OLT recipients.

STUDY DESIGN

The value of valganciclovir prophylaxis and laboratory-guided preemptive therapy for the prevention of CMV infection and disease was observed in 64 OLT recipients. Prophylaxis was given to all CMV seronegative recipients receiving a liver from a seropositive donor (D+R-; n=15), and all other recipients were randomised to receive either prophylaxis (n=24) or laboratory-guided preemptive therapy (n=25). Recipients were monitored for CMV DNAemia, viral load, emergence of antiviral resistant strains and co-infections.

RESULTS

CMV end-organ disease and antiviral resistant strains only occurred in D+R- recipients despite the use of prophylaxis in these patients. The D+R- recipients commencing prophylaxis immediately following transplantation had better outcomes compared to those for whom prophylaxis was delayed due to renal impairment. Prophylaxis reduced the incidence of CMV DNAemia, persistent infection, and high viral loads for CMV seropositive (D-R+and D+R+) recipients, but laboratory-guided preemptive therapy effectively controlled CMV infection and prevented disease in these OLT recipients.

CONCLUSION

Delaying the commencement of valganciclovir prophylaxis may be associated with worse outcomes for high-risk OLT recipients. Laboratory-guided pre-emptive therapy remains an alternative approach for seropositive recipients at lower risk of CMV disease.

Simultaneous monitoring of CMV and human herpesvirus 6 infections and diseases in liver transplant patients: one-year follow-up

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to simultaneously monitoring cytomegalovirus and human herpesvirus 6 active infections using nested-polymerase chain reaction and, together with clinical findings, follow the clinical status of patients undergoing liver transplant.

INTRODUCTION

The human β-herpesviruses, including cytomegalovirus and human herpesvirus 6, are ubiquitous among human populations. Active infections of human herpesvirus 6 and cytomegalovirus are common after liver transplantation, possibly induced and facilitated by allograft rejection and immunosuppressive therapy. Both viruses affect the success of the transplant procedure.

METHODS

Thirty patients submitted to liver transplant at the Liver Transplant Unit, at the Gastro Center, State University of Campinas, SP, Brazil, were studied prospectively from six months to one year, nested-polymerase chain reaction for cytomegalovirus and human herpesvirus 6 DNA detections. Two or more consecutive positive nested-polymerase chain reaction were considered indicative of active infection.

RESULTS

Active infection by cytomegalovirus was detected in 13/30 (43.3%) patients, median time to first cytomegalovirus detection was 29 days after transplantation (range: 0-99 days). Active infection by human herpesvirus 6 was detected in 12/30 (40%) patients, median time to first human herpesvirus 6 detection was 23.5 days after transplantation (range: 0-273 days). The time-related appearance of each virus was not statistically different (p = 0.49). Rejection of the transplanted liver was observed in 16.7% (5/30) of the patients. The present analysis showed that human herpesvirus 6 and/or cytomegalovirus active infections were frequent in liver transplant recipients at our center.

CONCLUSIONS

Few patients remain free of betaherpesviruses after liver transplantation. Most patients presenting active infection with more than one virus were infected sequentially and not concurrently. Nested-polymerase chain reaction can be considered of limited value for clinically monitoring cytomegalovirus and human herpesvirus 6.

Human herpesvirus 7

Az emberi 7-es herpeszvírus 1990 óta ismert, közeli rokonságban áll a 6-os herpeszvírussal, annak B változatával. Csak emberi sejtekben szaporodik, receptora a CD4 molekula. A fertőzött sejtek egy részében élethossziglan lappang, gyakran reaktiválódik és a nyálban tünetmentesen ürül. Gyermekek egy része 3–4 éves korára tünetmentesen fertőződik, de minden életkorban találhatók szeronegatív egyének, akik fogékonyak a fertőzés iránt. Gyermekekben ritkán exanthema subitum, múló lázas-görcsös állapotok, fiatal felnőttekben rózsahámlás, immunszuppresszált egyénekben a reaktiválódott 6-os B herpeszvírussal és cytomegalovirussal egyetemben halálos szövődmények alakulhatnak ki. Egyéb vírusokat is aktiválhat más kórképekben. A vírus patogenezisében a legfontosabb, hogy megváltozik a fertőzött lymphocytákból kiáramló citokinek és növekedési faktorok egyensúlya, amely láncreakcióként hat az immunrendszer és egyéb szervek sejtjeire. A vírusellenes antitestek kimutatása kereskedelmi forgalomban kapható készletekkel (immunfluoreszcencia, ELISA, immunoblot), a nukleinsav kimutatása fészkes polimeráz láncreakcióval lehetséges. A fertőzés következtében kialakult betegségek legtöbbje nem igényel kezelést, de súlyos szövődmények esetén ganciclovir és származékai, valamint foscarnet és cidofovir alkalmazható.

Serological profile of pretransplantation liver patients

INTRODUCTION

A liver transplantation is the first choice of treatment for patients with hepatic insufficiency due to chronic diseases. Infections in the postoperative period represent one of the main causes of mortality in these cases. However, few articles have evaluated the predominance of certain infectious diseases and their influence on postoperative mortality.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the medical records of 236 patients who underwent liver transplantation from January 1997 to January 2007. In these records we checked the serological profiles for these diseases: toxoplasmosis, syphilis, human T lymphotropic virus (HTLV) I and II infection, Chagas disease, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, paracoccidioidomycosis, tuberculosis, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, cytomegalovirus (CMV), and mononucleosis (Epstein-Barr virus [EBV]). The statistical analysis was performed by table frequencies.

RESULTS

CMV showed positivity (CMV-IgG) in 94.7% of patients, 95.8% for EBV, 33.3% for toxoplasmosis, 47.9% for hepatitis C, and 5% for hepatitis B.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis showed the importance of serological investigations and diagnostic examinations before the transplantation procedure, seeking to minimize possible reactivation of the disease after the use of immunosuppression drugs, particularly in the first 6 months after transplantation, or even to avoid a primary infection.

Human herpesvirus 7 primary infection in kidney transplant recipients

The aims of the study were to evaluate the incidence and the clinical implications of human herpesvirus (HHV)-7 primary infection in patients undergoing kidney transplantation and the probable interactions between the three beta-herpesviruses (cytomegalovirus [CMV], HHV-6, and HHV-7). Sixty kidney transplant recipients had sequential plasma and whole blood samples collected prior to transplantation and at 7, 14, 21, 28, 45, 60, 75, 90, and 180 days posttransplantation. We used indirect immunofluorescence assays to detect HHV-7 immunoglobulin (Ig) G antibodies in plasma and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction to assess CMV, HHV-6 and HHV-7 viral loads. Sixteen out of 60 patients (27%) did not show HHV-7 IgG antibodies prior to transplantation and they were selected for this study. Whereas 3 (18.75%) out of the 16 HHV-7 seronegative patients seroconverted after transplantation, only one patient (6%) had a high HHV-7 viral load from the seventh day posttransplantation in consecutive blood samples during follow-up without clinical manifestations. In our study, the incidence of posttransplant HHV-7 primary infection was low and asymptomatic.