Renal transplantation with expanded criteria donors: the experience of one Portuguese center

Outcomes with Tacrolimus-Based Immunosuppression After Kidney Transplantation from Standard- and Extended-Criteria Donors - A Post Hoc Analysis of the Prospective OSAKA Study

BACKGROUND This post hoc analysis of data from the prospective OSAKA study evaluated the efficacy and safety of prolonged- and immediate-release tacrolimus in patients who received kidneys from extended-criteria (ECD) and standard-criteria (SCD) donors. MATERIAL AND METHODS Within the ECD and SCD groups, patients were randomized to one of 4 tacrolimus-based regimens (initial dose): Arm 1, immediate-release tacrolimus (0.2 mg/kg/day); Arm 2, prolonged-release tacrolimus (0.2 mg/kg/day); Arm 3, prolonged-release tacrolimus (0.3 mg/kg/day); Arm 4, prolonged-release tacrolimus (0.2 mg/kg/day) plus basiliximab. All patients received mycophenolate mofetil and bolus corticosteroids; Arms 1-3 also received tapered corticosteroids. ECDs met the definition: living/deceased donors aged ≥60 years, or 50-60 years with ≥1 other risk factor, and donation after circulatory death. Primary composite endpoint: graft loss, biopsy-confirmed acute rejection or renal dysfunction by Day 168. Outcomes were compared across treatment arms with the chi-squared or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS A total of 1198 patients were included in the analysis (ECD: n=620 [51.8%], SCD: n=578 [48.2%]). Patients with kidneys from ECDs were older versus SCDs (mean age, 55.7 vs. 44.5 years, p<0.0001). A higher proportion of patients with kidneys from ECDs versus SCDs met the primary composite endpoint (56.8% vs. 32.4%, p<0.0001). However, no statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes or the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events were seen between treatment arms within each donor group. CONCLUSIONS Worse outcomes were experienced in patients who received kidneys from ECDs versus SCDs. Prolonged-release tacrolimus provided similar graft survival to the immediate-release formulation, with a manageable tolerability profile.

Risk Factors for 1-Year Graft Loss After Kidney Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

With expansion of the pool of kidney grafts, through the use of higher-risk donors, and increased attention to donor management strategies, the 1-year graft survival rate is subject to change. It is, therefore, useful to elucidate 1-year graft survival rates by dissecting the characteristics of the low-risk and high-risk kidney transplant cases. The objective of our study was to evaluate factors purported to influence the risk of 1-year graft loss in kidney transplant recipients.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

We searched bibliographic databases from 2000 to 2017 and included observational studies that measured the association between donor, recipient, the transplant operation, or early postoperative complications, and 1-year death-censored graft loss.

RESULTS

We identified 35 eligible primary studies, with 20 risk factors amenable to meta-analysis. Six factors were associated with graft loss, with moderate to high degree of certainty: donor age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.11 per 10-year increase; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.04 to 1.18), extended criteria donors (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.28 to 1.42), deceased donors (HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.32 to 1.82), number of HLA mismatches (HR, 1.08 per one mismatch increase; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.09), recipient age (HR, 1.17 per 10-year increase; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.25), and delayed graft function (HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.46 to 2.47) as risk factors for 1-year graft loss. Pooled analyses also excluded, with a high degree of certainty, any associations of cold ischemia time, recipient race, pretransplant body mass index, diabetes, and hypertension with 1-year graft loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Recipient age, donor age, standard versus extended criteria donor, living versus deceased donor, HLA mismatch, and delayed graft function all predicted 1-year graft survival. The effect of each risk factor is small.

Experiences With Expanded Criteria Donors: 10-Year Analysis of the Martin, Slovakia Transplant Center

OBJECTIVES

Kidneys from expanded criteria donors with diagnosis of brain death have become a part of the organ transplant program, which have thus increased the number of transplants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, we identified the expanded criteria donors in a group of 156 kidney donors at our center. Basic parameters of the donors before kidney recovery were collected. Graft function, graft survival, and patient survival at 1, 3, and 5 years posttransplant were compared in expanded criteria versus standard criteria donors.

RESULTS

Expanded criteria donors were significantly older than standard criteria donors (P < .001), had higher body mass index (P = .006), and had more frequent arterial hypertension (P < .001) and diabetes mellitus (P = .004) in their histories. When we considered the estimated glomerular filtration rate, graft function in the first 6 months after transplant was significantly worse in kidneys from expanded criteria donors (P = .011). In addition, recipients of grafts from expanded criteria donors had significantly worse survival in the first year posttransplant (P = .023); however, no differences in graft survival were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

From the long-term aspect, graft function and graft and patient survival in cases of kidneys from expanded criteria donors were comparable to results with kidneys from standard criteria donors. Expanded use of organs available for transplant is important due to the constantly increasing demands versus limited offers of organs.

Kidney Transplantation From Old Deceased Donors: Impact of Uric Acid Level-A Quarter-Century of Experience in One Transplant Center

BACKGROUND

The long-term burden of higher donor age on graft function and survival after kidney transplantation remains uncertain. Because both recipient and donor characteristics have evolved and the general population age is on the increase, we looked at the causes of kidney graft outcome.

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of different clinical parameters on long-term outcome of older-donor kidney transplantation. This retrospective study included 345 adult patients (58 patients received kidney from donors at least 55 years old) transplanted between January 1993 and December 2005 and were followed in one center throughout the post-transplant course (median, 9.4 years). Data included recipient and donor age, cold ischemia time, delayed graft function, panel reactive antibodies, HLA mismatch, time on dialysis, graft function at different time points, uric acid level, proteinuria, immunosuppression, and biopsy-proven rejection.

RESULTS

Improvement of estimated glomerular filtration rate at 36 months after transplantation was a good prognostic factor for long-term kidney function. Higher donor age decreased the chance for improvement of kidney function by 2.8% per year of life (P = .0244). Hyperuricemia was found in 46% of the study population; estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 50 mL/min/1.72 m² was associated with hyperuricaemia. A higher uric acid level was associated with inferior kidney function in recipient of older kidneys. Graft failure occurred late (median, 6.3 years post-transplantation) in 26 (44.8%) of older-donor recipients and in 87 (30.3%) of the remaining patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest an important association between older donor age and decreased allograft function in kidney recipients with elevated uric acid level. Recipients of older kidneys with normal uric acid level presented satisfactory outcomes.

Long-Term Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation From Expanded-Criteria Deceased Donors: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Organ shortage has prompted the use of expanded-criteria donors (ECDs). Our objective was to compare long-term outcomes of kidney transplants from ECDs with those from concurrent standard-criteria donors (SCDs). In addition, we evaluated variables associated with graft survival in both groups.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all 617 deceased-donor kidney transplantations performed from 2005 to 2009 in our department. The population was divided according to donor status into ECD or SCD. Patients were followed until 5 years after transplantation, death, graft failure, or loss to follow-up.

RESULTS

We transplanted 150 deceased-donor kidneys from ECDs and 467 from SCDs. ECD were older, more frequently women, had a lower pre-retrieval glomerular filtration rate, and more frequently died due to cerebrovascular accident. ECD recipients were older, presented a lower proportion of black race, more frequently were on hemodialysis, and presented a higher rate of first kidney transplants. Mean glomerular filtration rate was consistently lower in the ECD group. Patient and graft survivals were lower in the ECD group, but statistical significance was present only in graft survival censored for death with a functioning graft at 3 years and graft survival noncensored for death with a functioning graft at 5 years. Younger recipient ages, longer time on dialysis, acute rejection episodes, and glomerular filtration rate at 1 year after transplantation were independent risk factors for lower graft survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Transplantation with the use of ECD kidneys provide quite satisfactory patient and graft survival rates despite their poorer long-term outcomes.

Expanded Criteria Donors in Kidney Transplantation: The Role of Older Donors in a Setting of Older Recipients

Kidney transplantation (KT) is the therapy of choice for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The ESRD population is aging and so are patients waiting for KT. New strategies have been made for increasing the donor and recipient pools, and as a consequence kidneys from older donors or donors with significant comorbidities, the so-called “expanded criteria donor” (ECD) kidneys, are used for transplantation. Although good outcomes have been achieved from ECD, several issues are still waiting for clarification and need to be discussed. The concept of age matching is accepted as a method to ameliorate utilization of these allografts, but an optimal and widely accepted strategy is still not defined. The development of machine perfusion and the dual kidney transplantation are techniques which further improve the outcome of transplants from ECD, but the described experiences are scarce or coming from small single institutional reports. Also due to age-related immune dysfunction and associated comorbidities, the elderly recipients are more susceptible to immunosuppression related complications (e.g., infections and malignancy), although a widely accepted and validated immunosuppressive regimen is still lacking. In this paper, we review the issues related to KT employing allografts from marginal donors with a particular interest for the elderly patients.

Deceased donor neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and delayed graft function after kidney transplantation: a prospective study

Introduction

Expanding the criteria for deceased organ donors increases the risk of delayed graft function (DGF) and complicates kidney transplant outcome. We studied whether donor neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), a novel biomarker for acute kidney injury, could predict DGF after transplantation.

Methods

We included 99 consecutive, deceased donors and their 176 kidney recipients. For NGAL detection, donor serum and urine samples were collected before the donor operation. The samples were analyzed using a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (serum) and the ARCHITECT method (urine).

Results

Mean donor serum NGAL (S-NGAL) concentration was 218 ng/mL (range 27 to 658, standard deviation (SD) 145.1) and mean donor urine NGAL (U-NGAL) concentration was 18 ng/mL (range 0 to 177, SD 27.1). Donor S-NGAL and U-NGAL concentrations correlated directly with donor plasma creatinine levels and indirectly with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculated using the modification of diet in renal disease equation for glomerular filtration rate. In transplantations with high (greater than the mean) donor U-NGAL concentrations, prolonged DGF lasting longer than 14 days occurred more often than in transplantations with low (less than the mean) U-NGAL concentration (23% vs. 11%, P = 0.028), and 1-year graft survival was worse (90.3% vs. 97.4%, P = 0.048). High U-NGAL concentration was also associated with significantly more histological changes in the donor kidney biopsies than the low U-NGAL concentration. In a multivariate analysis, U-NGAL, expanded criteria donor status and eGFR emerged as independent risk factors for prolonged DGF. U-NGAL concentration failed to predict DGF on the basis of receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

Conclusions

This first report on S-NGAL and U-NGAL levels in deceased donors shows that donor U-NGAL, but not donor S-NGAL, measurements give added value when evaluating the suitability of a potential deceased kidney donor.