Early and Delayed Onset Cytomegalovirus Infection of Liver Transplant Recipients in Endemic Areas

Infections After Liver Transplant -Timeline, Management and Prevention

Liver transplantation (LT) is the standard treatment for end- stage liver disease. Patient and graft survival have improved significantly in the last three decades owing to improvement in surgical technique, better perioperative management and better immunosuppressive regimens. However, LT recipients are at increased risk of infections, particularly in the first year after transplantation. The risk of infection is directly proportional to immunosuppressive regimen and graft function. In this review, we will briefly discuss the timeline of infections after liver transplant, preventive strategies and management of infectious complications.

Risk factors and clinical outcomes of cytomegalovirus diseases in hematologic malignancy patients without hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the risk factors and prognosis for CMV diseases in hematologic malignancy patients without hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT).

METHODS

We performed a case-control study (1:2) between 2012 and 2022. Adults with pathologic-confirmed CMV diseases (n=60) among hematologic malignancy patients were matched and compared to whom without CMV disease.

RESULTS

Lymphoma was the most common underlying malignancy, and gastrointestinal tract involvement was the most common CMV disease. In the case group, high-dose steroid administration and transfusion within one month before diagnosis were higher (p<0.001). Steroid administration (aOR=5.78; 95% confidence interval: 1.25-26.68, p=0.024), red blood cell transfusion within one month (aOR=14.63; 2.75-77.76, p=0.002), low BMI (aOR=13.46, 2.07-87.45, p=0.006), and hypoalbuminemia (aOR=26.48, 5.93-118.17, p<0.001) were independent risk factors associated with CMV disease. The 30-day mortality was higher in the case group and CMV disease was significantly associated with all-cause mortality (aOR=14.41, 3.23-64.31, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

In hematologic malignancy patients without HSCT, risk factors for CMV organ disease included high-dose steroid administration and RBC transfusion within one month, low BMI, and hypoalbuminemia. Overall mortality was significantly higher with CMV disease, and CMV disease occurrence was a significant risk factor for mortality.

Association of CMV-specific T-cell immunity and risk of CMV infection in lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Protecting against CMV infection and maintaining CMV in latent state are largely provided by CMV-specific T-cells in lung transplant recipients. The aim of the study was to assess whether a specific T-cell response is associated with the risk for CMV infection in seronegative patients who are at high risk for delayed CMV infection.

METHODS

All CMV-seronegative recipients (R-) from CMV-seropositive donors (D+) between January 2018 and April 2019 were included and retrospectively screened for CMV infection before and after assessment of CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity.

RESULTS

Thirty-one of the 50 patients (62%) developed early-onset CMV infection. Lower absolute neutrophil counts were significantly associated with early-onset CMV infection. Antiviral prophylaxis was ceased after 137.2 ± 42.8 days. CMV-CMI were measured at a median of 5.5 months after LTx. 19 patients experienced early and late-onset CMV infection after prophylaxis withdrawal within 15 months post transplantation. Positive CMV-CMI was significantly associated with lower risk of late-onset CMV infection after transplantation in logistic and cox-regression analysis (OR=0.05, p = .01; OR=2,369, p = .026).

CONCLUSION

D+/R- lung transplant recipients are at high risk of developing early and late-onset CMV infection. Measurement of CMV-CMI soon after transplantation might further define the CMV infection prediction risk in LTx recipients being at high risk for CMV viremia.

RISK FACTORS FOR POST-LIVER TRANSPLANT BILIARY COMPLICATIONS IN THE ABSENCE OF ARTERIAL COMPLICATIONS

BACKGROUND

- Biliary complications (BC) represent the most frequent complication after liver transplantation, up to 34% of cases.

AIM

To identify modifiable risk factors to biliary complications after liver transplantation, essential to decrease morbidity.

METHOD

Clinical data, anatomical characteristics of recipient and donors, and transplant operation features of 306 transplants with full arterial patency were collected to identify risk factors associated with BC.

RESULTS

BC occurred in 22.9% after 126 days (median) post-transplantation. In univariate analyses group 1 (without BC, n=236) and group 2 patients (with BC, n=70) did not differ on their general characteristics. BC were related to recipient age under 40y (p=0.029), CMV infection (p=0.021), biliary disease as transplant indication (p=0.018), lower pre-transplant INR (p=0.009), and bile duct diameter <3 mm (p=0.033). CMV infections occurred sooner in patients with postoperative biliary complications vs. control (p=0.07). In a multivariate analysis, only CMV infection, lower INR, and shorter bile duct diameter correlated with BC. Positive CMV antigenemia correlated with biliary complications, even when titers lied below the treatment threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

Biliary complications after liver transplantation correlated with low recipient INR before operation, bile duct diameter <3 mm, and positive antigenemia for CMV or disease manifestation. As the only modifiable risk factor, routine preemptive CMV inhibition is suggested to diminish biliary morbidity after liver transplant.

Progress and Challenges in the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Transplantation

Hosts with compromised or naive immune systems, such as individuals living with HIV/AIDS, transplant recipients, and fetuses, are at the highest risk for complications from cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Despite substantial progress in prevention, diagnostics, and treatment, CMV continues to negatively impact both solid-organ transplant (SOT) and hematologic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. In this article, we summarize important developments in the field over the past 10 years and highlight new approaches and remaining challenges to the optimal control of CMV infection and disease in transplant settings.

Infections in Liver Transplantation

Liver transplantation has become an important treatment modality for patients with end-stage liver disease/cirrhosis, acute liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Although surgical techniques and immunosuppressive regimens for liver transplantation have improved significantly over the past 20 years, infectious complications continue to contribute to the morbidity and mortality in this patient population. The use of standardized screening protocols for both donors and recipients, coupled with targeted prophylaxis against specific pathogens, has helped to mitigate the risk of infection in liver transplant recipients. Patients with chronic liver disease and cirrhosis have immunological deficits that place them at increased risk for infection while awaiting liver transplantation. The patient undergoing liver transplantation is prone to develop healthcare-acquired infections due to multidrug-resistant organisms that could potentially affect patient outcomes after transplantation. The complex nature of liver transplant surgery that involves multiple vascular and hepatobiliary anastomoses further increases the risk of infection after liver transplantation. During the early post-transplantation period, healthcare-acquired bacterial and fungal infections are the most common types of infection encountered in liver transplant recipients. The period of maximal immunosuppression that occurs at 1–6 months after transplantation can be complicated by opportunistic infections due to both primary infection and reactivation of latent infection. Severe community-acquired infections can complicate the course of liver transplantation beyond 12 months after transplant surgery. This chapter provides an overview of liver transplantation including indications, donor-recipient selection criteria, surgical procedures, and immunosuppressive therapies. A focus on infections in patients with chronic liver disease/cirrhosis and an overview of the specific infectious complications in liver transplant recipients are presented.

Successful multidisciplinary treatment of refractory cytomegalovirus infection after living donor liver transplantation using mixed lymphocyte reactions: report of a case

A 52-year-old Japanese male underwent ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation for acute-on-chronic hepatitis B infection. Fifty-one months later, he became feverish and a cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection was diagnosed. A dramatically high CMV pp65 antigen (C10/C11) load (2,412) was measured, which did not respond to ganciclovir and immune globulin treatment, and increased further to 5,353. The next treatment strategy was the reduction of immunosuppressants, but to simply reduce immunosuppressants can lead to graft loss. Therefore, before using this strategy, responses to alloantigens were evaluated using a carboxyfluorescein-diacetate-succimidyl ester-labeled mixed lymphocyte reaction (CFSE-MLR). Only limited CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell proliferation was observed, suggesting the patient was hyporesponsive. After reducing tacrolimus levels from 3-4 ng/mL to <1.5-1.8 ng/mL, the fever dropped immediately and C10/C11 disappeared after 2 months. In conclusion, CFSE-MLR could be a useful tool for the treatment of refractory infectious disease after transplantation and, importantly, for checking a patient's immunosuppressive state beyond the perioperative period.

Universal prophylaxis or preemptive strategy for cytomegalovirus disease after liver transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

We systematically reviewed and meta-analyze the efficacy of universal prophylaxis (UP) and preemptive (PE) strategies (using ganciclovir or valganciclovir) in preventing cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease (CMD) among liver transplant recipients (LTRs). We performed an electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Database till December 2013. Studies that assessed UP or PE for preventing CMD in LTRs were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The primary outcome was CMD, secondary outcomes being acute cellular rejection (ACR), graft loss (GL) and mortality. Due to the heterogeneity of comparative studies, an indirect comparison was performed. Pooled incidence rates with 95% confidence interval (CI) are calculated for each outcome using a random-effects model. Thirty-two studies involving 2456 LTRs were included. The majority of the studies were of low risk of bias. Irrespective of donor/recipient CMV sero-status, CMD was 10% with UP (95% CI: 6-14; I(2)  = 87%; 16 studies, n = 1581) and 7% with PE (95% CI: 3-10; I(2)  = 84%; 16 studies, n = 875) (mean difference 2.6; 95% CI: -3.25 to 8.45, p = 0.34). Likewise, ACR and mortality were similar with the two strategies. However, GL was significantly lower in the UP group, regardless of donor/recipient sero-status. In indirect comparison, the incidence of CMD, ACR and mortality in LTRs were similar with two strategies. Trials comparing the two strategies directly are needed.

Clinical presentation and risk factors for cytomegalovirus colitis in immunocompetent adult patients

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) colitis is a common manifestation of CMV end-organ disease, which has typically been described in immunocompromised hosts. Recently, it has been noted that this also occurs in immunocompetent patients. To gather relevant data about clinical presentation, prognosis, and risk factors for development of CMV colitis in immunocompetent hosts, we analyzed all cases that occurred during a 19-year period at our institution.

METHODS

A case-control study was performed to identify risk factors for CMV colitis in immunocompetent hosts. Electronic medical records of individuals who were admitted and diagnosed with CMV colitis between January 1995 and February 2014 at a tertiary care university hospital were reviewed. Two non-CMV colitis patients who were age- and sex-matched were selected as controls for each case.

RESULTS

A total of 51 patients with CMV colitis were included in this study along with 102 control patients. Certain conditions including renal disease on hemodialysis, neurologic disease, rheumatologic disease, intensive care unit admission, and exposure to antibiotics, antacids, steroids, or red blood cell (RBC) transfusions within 1 month of diagnosis of colitis were associated with CMV colitis on univariate analysis. Among these, steroid use and RBC transfusion within 1 month were identified as independent risk factors for developing CMV colitis on multivariate analysis. The 30-day mortality rate was 7.8% without any attributable mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Steroid use and RBC transfusion within 1 month of the diagnosis of colitis were independent risk factors for development of CMV colitis in immunocompetent hosts.

Infections in liver transplant recipients

Liver transplantation is a standard life-saving procedure for the treatment of many end-stage liver diseases. The success of this procedure may be limited by infectious complications. In this article, we review the contemporary state of infectious complications during the post-operative period, with particular emphasis on those that occur most commonly during the first 6 mo after liver transplantation. Bacteria, and less commonly Candida infections, remain the predominant pathogens during the immediate post-operative period, especially during the first month, and infections caused by drug-resistant strains are emerging. Infections caused by cytomegalovirus and Aspergillus sp. present clinically during the "opportunistic" period characterized by intense immunosuppression. As newer potent immunosuppressive therapies with the major aim of reducing allograft rejection are developed, one potential adverse effect is an increase in certain infections. Hence, it is essential for liver transplant centers to have an effective approach to prevention that is based on predicted infection risk, local antimicrobial resistance patterns, and surveillance. A better understanding of the common and most important infectious complications is anticipated to lead to improvements in quality of life and survival of liver transplant recipients.